Product Links: Pioneer DJ CDJ-3000 professional DJ multiplayer www.zzounds.com/a--3970758/item--PIOCDJ3000 Pioneer DJ DJM-V10 6 channel DJ mixer www.zzounds.com/a--3970758/item--PIODJMV10
DJFITME, I bought the V10 exactly a year ago and I absolutely still love it. What a brilliant tool! Indeed very glad I got rid of my Denon stuff; welcome back Pioneer!
This is why I come to your channel for new Pioneer gear. You give a serious breakdown and add things we didn't know about a product. I went to the DJ channel you mentioned and he gave a great comparison of the CDJ 2000 NX2 and the CDJ 3000. I went to DJ Passionate channel but as usual, they have negative to say about any Pioneer gear for they ride and die with Denon. That's cool but if you going to give a showing of new gear, be a pro about it. Thank you for your professionalism.
No problem, everyone has their own perspective, but at the end of the day, no one should be imposing decisions for anyone else. They should provide information and let folks do it on their own.
Denon Dj user here whilst I prefer the sc6000s Pri Yon Joni has done a great job here explaining what it actually does and why Pioneer choose to go the route they did.
After waiting (4) months they have arrived & I'm not disappointed at all. I've owned the CDJ 2000s before but returned them for Denons. My wait for these was well worth it, these 3000 deck are amazing, the jogs smooth , display big & clear, HID flawless, overall functionality is on point. Export still slow & sucks but that's Rekordbox overall Pioneer is the industry standard for a reason. I still have my Denon 5000s & no plans on selling with this latest engine update made them all new again. But, these will be go tos for my major shows and club tours. I have moved away a lot from controllers for use in major event, this was the extra push I needed. My gear head days have ended on these 2 rigs, major in cost but major results already 2022 is looking good thus far. Thank you for the amazing reviews they helped me decide between the CDJ 3000s and the Denon 6000s. Use Hype gear or step out the box like Laidback Luke lol. Keep up the work, you save a lot of DJs like me on gear decisions.
These are amazing machines, Pri yon Joni is an excellent instructor. I played on SC6000s last night. I've also played on these several times in the last few months. While I can say I don't mind using SC6000s, nothing beats the familiarity and original beast that is Pioneer CDJs and the technology and innovation that got us the CDJ3000s to where they are today. The wave file display is someting I would never like to compromise on. These are industry standard for a reason.
Thanks for very detailed video, UA-cam algorithm should push your video more up so Danon dj's will have better understanding what is all about and stop throwing hate under each CDJ-3000 videos... I have question is there any plans with firmware update allow to preview through RCA so it will be more compatible with older Pioneer and other brand mixers ? or it's always will be exclusive only to Link ?
Great review! This are the things we need to know! Pioneer just released this unit with empty cheap phrases and expected our money. After watching this review - I really consider getting those (later after all this Covid-shit)...
after trying the sc6000 decks, then returning them (although very capable decks) for 3000 decks... these 3000 decks are just perfect. along with the v10... and it's just a beautifully designed system.
Hi, I love your review. One thing I can't find on any reviews, can you change the track order in the playlist or tag list? For example, moving a track from the fifth spot to the third, can you do that?
This is a great video. Helpful and lots of info that you don’t see in many videos I watched. Thx. I grabbed 3 decks and a DJS1000. Now there are 2 things that you didn’t address and I was wondering about. 1) hot cues load with lag. Not instantly. Which is kind of a pain. Why is that? 2) why did they decide not to give the ability to gate the cue???
Hot cues load much faster on the CDJ-3000 compared to the 4-8 seconds on the CDJ-2000NXS2. The variability will depend on your file type. MP3s will typically load faster. While not completely instant like on DJ software on a computer, a typical 320kbps mp3 will load from .8 to 1.5 seconds. 8:18 of this video shows a hack on how to get gate cue on a CDJ-3000 ua-cam.com/video/tDLGCkwr3GA/v-deo.html
Thanks! It’s not really a review, but a demo. The hub is just a generic USB 2.0 hub I got from Walmart. I don’t remember the brand, it’s nothing special.
@@priyonjoni I'm ever confused about..so we have 2 cases: 1) plug CDJs and mac/pc in USB hub (as you've done) and USB into mixer, then you play by CDJs music in rekordbox inside mac/pc 2) plug CDJs, mixer and mac/pc in Ethernet hub, then you can use that features as Track Preview.. ..is it correct?
@@djbobrokk723 this video explains the different ways to use the CDJ.ua-cam.com/video/fzKXGCDVoiU/v-deo.html But yes, Export Mode in Rekordbox is what you need to use to use Link Preview.
On my XDJ-XZ i have the function to see key and play time playd or left inside the jog wheel. When will the CDJ 3000 update that function ? And i love to see a record function on all Pioneer high end mixers soon. Now thinking about the USB record port. Recording through a iphone with the App sucks to be honest and im a android user. Pioneer should think about this now in 2024. Only me?
The reason time and key is on the jog on the XZ is because there is only one main display on it. The CDJ-3000 has a larger main display and when you have two CDJs, there are two of them, and are larger; leaving the jog display to be dedicated to the rotation indicator.
Hey pri yon joni what would u recommend. I currently want to buy the xdj-1000mk2 but now think there will be an upgrade soon. What would u recommend me to do. Wait for the update or buy the current model Love your indepth content has definitely helped me ❤️
I don’t make recommendations. I provide information so folks can make decisions on their own. It really depends if you need a set or not, and what other needs you have. Everyone’s situation is different.
Any benefit of being able to convert audio to a higher bitrate and why not just start playing with a lossless, uncompressed audio file? Does it have some sort of ai? If I understand correctly when you have a graphics image file, you can up the resolution of the file (higher dpi for example) but if the data isn't there, it just makes the image look blurry when you zoom in and you don't really gain anything since the data is simply missing. Trying to understand how the DAC converting audio to a higher bitrate would be useful in enhancing the audio. Seems like the main benefit is actually rendering time-stretched audio or rendering the real time output of things like sound effects applied to audio (asking to understand and make sure I'm not missing anything else the new DAC might be there to accomplish)
There is a misconception about upscaling. There are actually multiple ways to upscale, with some that prevent aliasing. In photo or video, “stretching” the image to a high resolution will result in a blurry or pixelated image as you described. However, through an algorithm of “interpolation” which literally means, “to fill in missing information”, you can make a low resolution image look higher, crisper and shower. This is how some folks can take a UA-cam clip of their favorite TV show and make it look 4k. Or how they can make a 20 or 30 frame per second footage look 60fps. In the Matrix, bullet time scenes were filmed using several cameras around the actor but the scene looks like one single camera going around. The reason it looks so smooth is because of interpolation. The computer generates imagery that doesn’t exist, in between the camera positions. It predicts what the imagery would look like between two frames or two camera positions. This was back in 1999. The reason I give this example is because photo and video is way more complex than audio. If you can interpolate something as complex as visual images in motion, digital audio is much much simpler to achieve, and can be done in real time with a powerful enough processor. For more examples, search Topaz AI. There are countless videos were folks were able to successfully upconvert and double the frame rate of lower resolution video clips. Here is a link ua-cam.com/video/tZ078q_JN2A/v-deo.html Also, to answer your question, why not just play lossless? Well, most music might not be available lossless. And even if they are, most aren’t rendered at 96khz 32 bit. Plus the process of interpolation isn’t restoring the information that is lost in an MP3. MP3 compression operates on the frequency spectrum below and above the human hearing level. That’s why I low bitrate MP3 starts to lose bass and treble information. What interpolation is doing is filling in the missing sample rate and bit depth. Both of which are generally consistent for a WAV file and it’s MP3 counterpart.
Thanks for the this video and all the others. You convinced me! I have now taken the leap from the 2000NSX2 to the 3000 and all is good except....... I believe there is a glitch with the continuous play option ie there is a gap between each file played. For example, after I finish DJing I like to play a downloaded "Mix" for the chillout. This is a collection of files that can be saved to a memory stick and played continuously without a gaps (for example a Sasha "live" Mix). This worked fine on a 2000NSX2, but on the 3000 there is a gap between each file. I logged an issue with Pioneer but they said "it's not a CD player" and scratch DJs wanted the gap. I don't scratch but I know you do - as well as being a CDJ3000 expert of course - after 1,000 of hours experience by now (I have about 10!). Any views? I would be a pain to have to keep a 2000 just for this purpose. Surely it's just a software glitch..... Anyway. Thanks for the channel! Steve
Hello! Congrats on your purchase! There was actually a huge complaint from folks, not just scratch DJs, that there wasn’t a gap. What happens is, if you’re at the very beginning of a track, and you wind the jog wheel back just a little bit; the track changes to the previous track. It’s been a thing since the CDJ-1000mk3. Since it’s not a CD player anymore, and the general use of the CDJ-3000 is to play tracks manually and individually, the gap is there to enhance the use of manual play. If you’re playing a prerecorded mix and you want it to play nonstop, just render it as a single track.
@@priyonjoni OK I get that now - thanks for explaining. I'll hang onto a CDJ2000 for when I really want that seamless continuous listening setting I have enjoyed.
The officially recommended maximum is 95°. However, when the device was presented to me by our product planners, the information was shared that I am aware of internal testing up to 150°F. The overall point six the machine will operate beyond the comfortable temperatures for human beings, and your warranty will cover anything up 95°.
I'm currently using a Pioneer CDJ-3000 with timecode USB (not HID) and a Pioneer DJM-A9 at my club. I connected my MacBook directly to the mixer using the Serato Club Kit, but I can't control Serato DJ Pro in relative mode anymore. It's strange because at home, I use timecode USB (not HID) with Pioneer CDJ-2000NXS2 and Pioneer DJM-900NXS2, and I can control Serato DJ Pro in relative mode without any issues. I'm wondering if the problem lies with the Pioneer CDJ-3000 or the Pioneer DJM-A9. My guest DJ is experiencing the same issue too. Any ideas?
First, is there a reason to use DVS over HID? You have more feature with HID? Second do they have the Serato Club Kit installed? Also, HID mode does not require the Serato Club Kit. But DVS does.
@@priyonjoni Using the USB timecode (not HID) makes it simpler to switch between DJs, avoiding the risk of unplugging the wrong USB cable that HID mode may pose. All of us have the Serato DJ Suites, so I'm uncertain why this problem only occurs with the Pioneer CDJ-3000 and Pioneer DJM-A9.
Does the xdi xz have the same computer processors in it to possibly open it up more? Kinda like how you described the cdj3000s being able to be updated with new features with updates?
it's not correct what you say that the CDJ3000 (or any process) can upsample a 44/16 file to 96/32 and get missing information back. Or make your files sound better than they did originally. If they do sound different, it's not a result of changing the sample rate or bit depth.
The process is called interpolation. It’s not the same as recording something and plying it back at 96khz, but it is similar to the process of taking the existing information, and filling the missing information with the best guess. This is possible audio and imaging. Topaz Labs is known to do it with imaging both video and photo. It can take a 1080p image and fill information to make it a sharper 4K image. Again, the process is called “interpolation” and is the reason why the CDJ-3000 has better sounding time stretching when Master Tempo is engaged.
hey, quick question: the stacked waveforms at 8:12 , do you need to use a Pioneer mixer / Pro DJ link to do this or can I use any other mixer (MP2015 currently) and get the stacked waveforms as per in your video? Cheers
That is correct. The mixer being connected in the Pro DJ Link has nothing to do with the library. It’s more for FX tempo syncing, jog wheel LED arming light, as well as Link Preview and Link Cue with CDJ-3000s.
The rotation indicator doesn't have anything else on it when there isn't album art. And it's 60fps so it looks smoother than the outdated classic look.
Product Links:
Pioneer DJ CDJ-3000 professional DJ multiplayer
www.zzounds.com/a--3970758/item--PIOCDJ3000
Pioneer DJ DJM-V10 6 channel DJ mixer
www.zzounds.com/a--3970758/item--PIODJMV10
I just got them yesterday and v10. Dream has come true. Has everything i have ever wanted and needed.
Movin up bro! Have fun!
Have fun with them!
@@priyonjoni Thanks man ! Will make lots videos with them :)
Yeah screw them Denon fan boys
DJFITME, I bought the V10 exactly a year ago and I absolutely still love it. What a brilliant tool! Indeed very glad I got rid of my Denon stuff; welcome back Pioneer!
The shortcut button next to the browse knob is a lot easier to use when adjusting beat jump length
best demonstration and explanation of the cdj 3000
Thank you! And thank you for watching
This is why I come to your channel for new Pioneer gear. You give a serious breakdown and add things we didn't know about a product. I went to the DJ channel you mentioned and he gave a great comparison of the CDJ 2000 NX2 and the CDJ 3000. I went to DJ Passionate channel but as usual, they have negative to say about any Pioneer gear for they ride and die with Denon. That's cool but if you going to give a showing of new gear, be a pro about it. Thank you for your professionalism.
No problem, everyone has their own perspective, but at the end of the day, no one should be imposing decisions for anyone else. They should provide information and let folks do it on their own.
Your review answers a lot of the questions I had upon the 3000’s release. Thank you Pri yon Joni 👍
Denon Dj user here whilst I prefer the sc6000s Pri Yon Joni has done a great job here explaining what it actually does and why Pioneer choose to go the route they did.
After waiting (4) months they have arrived & I'm not disappointed at all. I've owned the CDJ 2000s before but returned them for Denons. My wait for these was well worth it, these 3000 deck are amazing, the jogs smooth , display big & clear, HID flawless, overall functionality is on point. Export still slow & sucks but that's Rekordbox overall Pioneer is the industry standard for a reason. I still have my Denon 5000s & no plans on selling with this latest engine update made them all new again. But, these will be go tos for my major shows and club tours. I have moved away a lot from controllers for use in major event, this was the extra push I needed. My gear head days have ended on these 2 rigs, major in cost but major results already 2022 is looking good thus far. Thank you for the amazing reviews they helped me decide between the CDJ 3000s and the Denon 6000s. Use Hype gear or step out the box like Laidback Luke lol. Keep up the work, you save a lot of DJs like me on gear decisions.
These are amazing machines, Pri yon Joni is an excellent instructor. I played on SC6000s last night. I've also played on these several times in the last few months. While I can say I don't mind using SC6000s, nothing beats the familiarity and original beast that is Pioneer CDJs and the technology and innovation that got us the CDJ3000s to where they are today. The wave file display is someting I would never like to compromise on. These are industry standard for a reason.
Excellent, detailed in-depth preview worth revisiting!
Oh man Pri, you're just the best DJ youtube content creator. So knowledgeable and passioned!
Thanks for watching!
Love the headphone rerouted to use deck preview trick.
fantastic overview! scratching is on poiiiint. can’t wait for mine to finally arrive (backorder for over a year but shipping next week!!!)
this is a fabulous demo, thank you!
Sick thumbnail
Thanks Ravine! And great video comparison of the 3000 and NXS2!
Thanks for very detailed video, UA-cam algorithm should push your video more up so Danon dj's will have better understanding what is all about and stop throwing hate under each CDJ-3000 videos... I have question is there any plans with firmware update allow to preview through RCA so it will be more compatible with older Pioneer and other brand mixers ? or it's always will be exclusive only to Link ?
Great review!
This are the things we need to know!
Pioneer just released this unit with empty cheap phrases and expected our money.
After watching this review - I really consider getting those (later after all this Covid-shit)...
after trying the sc6000 decks, then returning them (although very capable decks) for 3000 decks... these 3000 decks are just perfect. along with the v10... and it's just a beautifully designed system.
Same experience here. Absolutely love my V10/3000 setup!
Thank so much for these! Really helped me make my mind up about getting these :)
Really appreciate you
Very good presentation 👏
Nice video
Hi, I love your review. One thing I can't find on any reviews, can you change the track order in the playlist or tag list? For example, moving a track from the fifth spot to the third, can you do that?
Good question. Do you know, 7 month’s later the answer? I wan’t to know that to.
Lovely stuff, but why can't find the link page on the other CDJs
This is a great video. Helpful and lots of info that you don’t see in many videos I watched. Thx. I grabbed 3 decks and a DJS1000.
Now there are 2 things that you didn’t address and I was wondering about. 1) hot cues load with lag. Not instantly. Which is kind of a pain. Why is that? 2) why did they decide not to give the ability to gate the cue???
Hot cues load much faster on the CDJ-3000 compared to the 4-8 seconds on the CDJ-2000NXS2. The variability will depend on your file type. MP3s will typically load faster. While not completely instant like on DJ software on a computer, a typical 320kbps mp3 will load from .8 to 1.5 seconds.
8:18 of this video shows a hack on how to get gate cue on a CDJ-3000 ua-cam.com/video/tDLGCkwr3GA/v-deo.html
@@priyonjoni ahahah brilliant. Thx!
Best CDJ 3000 review around!
what's that tiny hub you've to plug CDJs and mac/pc? I'm interested into..
it's powered by mac/pc?
Thanks! It’s not really a review, but a demo. The hub is just a generic USB 2.0 hub I got from Walmart. I don’t remember the brand, it’s nothing special.
@@priyonjoni I'm ever confused about..so we have 2 cases:
1) plug CDJs and mac/pc in USB hub (as you've done) and USB into mixer, then you play by CDJs music in rekordbox inside mac/pc
2) plug CDJs, mixer and mac/pc in Ethernet hub, then you can use that features as Track Preview..
..is it correct?
@@djbobrokk723 this video explains the different ways to use the CDJ.ua-cam.com/video/fzKXGCDVoiU/v-deo.html But yes, Export Mode in Rekordbox is what you need to use to use Link Preview.
Praying mantis; typing on hot cues; and more. Excellent review!
On my XDJ-XZ i have the function to see key and play time playd or left inside the jog wheel. When will the CDJ 3000 update that function ?
And i love to see a record function on all Pioneer high end mixers soon. Now thinking about the USB record port. Recording through a iphone with the App sucks to be honest and im a android user.
Pioneer should think about this now in 2024. Only me?
The reason time and key is on the jog on the XZ is because there is only one main display on it. The CDJ-3000 has a larger main display and when you have two CDJs, there are two of them, and are larger; leaving the jog display to be dedicated to the rotation indicator.
Just for your Peter Piper routine I will see you! a dope DJ
Hey pri yon joni what would u recommend. I currently want to buy the xdj-1000mk2 but now think there will be an upgrade soon. What would u recommend me to do. Wait for the update or buy the current model
Love your indepth content has definitely helped me ❤️
I don’t make recommendations. I provide information so folks can make decisions on their own. It really depends if you need a set or not, and what other needs you have. Everyone’s situation is different.
thank you
Great video, do you know when will these will be compatible with serato and DDJ 1000srt
Awesome
Any benefit of being able to convert audio to a higher bitrate and why not just start playing with a lossless, uncompressed audio file? Does it have some sort of ai? If I understand correctly when you have a graphics image file, you can up the resolution of the file (higher dpi for example) but if the data isn't there, it just makes the image look blurry when you zoom in and you don't really gain anything since the data is simply missing. Trying to understand how the DAC converting audio to a higher bitrate would be useful in enhancing the audio. Seems like the main benefit is actually rendering time-stretched audio or rendering the real time output of things like sound effects applied to audio (asking to understand and make sure I'm not missing anything else the new DAC might be there to accomplish)
There is a misconception about upscaling. There are actually multiple ways to upscale, with some that prevent aliasing. In photo or video, “stretching” the image to a high resolution will result in a blurry or pixelated image as you described.
However, through an algorithm of “interpolation” which literally means, “to fill in missing information”, you can make a low resolution image look higher, crisper and shower. This is how some folks can take a UA-cam clip of their favorite TV show and make it look 4k. Or how they can make a 20 or 30 frame per second footage look 60fps.
In the Matrix, bullet time scenes were filmed using several cameras around the actor but the scene looks like one single camera going around. The reason it looks so smooth is because of interpolation. The computer generates imagery that doesn’t exist, in between the camera positions. It predicts what the imagery would look like between two frames or two camera positions. This was back in 1999.
The reason I give this example is because photo and video is way more complex than audio. If you can interpolate something as complex as visual images in motion, digital audio is much much simpler to achieve, and can be done in real time with a powerful enough processor.
For more examples, search Topaz AI. There are countless videos were folks were able to successfully upconvert and double the frame rate of lower resolution video clips.
Here is a link ua-cam.com/video/tZ078q_JN2A/v-deo.html
Also, to answer your question, why not just play lossless? Well, most music might not be available lossless. And even if they are, most aren’t rendered at 96khz 32 bit. Plus the process of interpolation isn’t restoring the information that is lost in an MP3. MP3 compression operates on the frequency spectrum below and above the human hearing level. That’s why I low bitrate MP3 starts to lose bass and treble information. What interpolation is doing is filling in the missing sample rate and bit depth. Both of which are generally consistent for a WAV file and it’s MP3 counterpart.
Thanks for the this video and all the others. You convinced me! I have now taken the leap from the 2000NSX2 to the 3000 and all is good except....... I believe there is a glitch with the continuous play option ie there is a gap between each file played. For example, after I finish DJing I like to play a downloaded "Mix" for the chillout. This is a collection of files that can be saved to a memory stick and played continuously without a gaps (for example a Sasha "live" Mix). This worked fine on a 2000NSX2, but on the 3000 there is a gap between each file. I logged an issue with Pioneer but they said "it's not a CD player" and scratch DJs wanted the gap. I don't scratch but I know you do - as well as being a CDJ3000 expert of course - after 1,000 of hours experience by now (I have about 10!). Any views? I would be a pain to have to keep a 2000 just for this purpose. Surely it's just a software glitch..... Anyway. Thanks for the channel! Steve
Hello! Congrats on your purchase!
There was actually a huge complaint from folks, not just scratch DJs, that there wasn’t a gap. What happens is, if you’re at the very beginning of a track, and you wind the jog wheel back just a little bit; the track changes to the previous track. It’s been a thing since the CDJ-1000mk3. Since it’s not a CD player anymore, and the general use of the CDJ-3000 is to play tracks manually and individually, the gap is there to enhance the use of manual play.
If you’re playing a prerecorded mix and you want it to play nonstop, just render it as a single track.
@@priyonjoni OK I get that now - thanks for explaining. I'll hang onto a CDJ2000 for when I really want that seamless continuous listening setting I have enjoyed.
Holy fuck this video is 50min long, awesome!
The manual here in Romania says from 5 up to 35 degrees celsius, and that is 95 fahrenheit... not 150 !!!
The officially recommended maximum is 95°. However, when the device was presented to me by our product planners, the information was shared that I am aware of internal testing up to 150°F. The overall point six the machine will operate beyond the comfortable temperatures for human beings, and your warranty will cover anything up 95°.
@@priyonjoni ok, thanks!
I'm currently using a Pioneer CDJ-3000 with timecode USB (not HID) and a Pioneer DJM-A9 at my club. I connected my MacBook directly to the mixer using the Serato Club Kit, but I can't control Serato DJ Pro in relative mode anymore.
It's strange because at home, I use timecode USB (not HID) with Pioneer CDJ-2000NXS2 and Pioneer DJM-900NXS2, and I can control Serato DJ Pro in relative mode without any issues. I'm wondering if the problem lies with the Pioneer CDJ-3000 or the Pioneer DJM-A9.
My guest DJ is experiencing the same issue too. Any ideas?
First, is there a reason to use DVS over HID? You have more feature with HID? Second do they have the Serato Club Kit installed?
Also, HID mode does not require the Serato Club Kit. But DVS does.
@@priyonjoni Using the USB timecode (not HID) makes it simpler to switch between DJs, avoiding the risk of unplugging the wrong USB cable that HID mode may pose. All of us have the Serato DJ Suites, so I'm uncertain why this problem only occurs with the Pioneer CDJ-3000 and Pioneer DJM-A9.
Does the xdi xz have the same computer processors in it to possibly open it up more? Kinda like how you described the cdj3000s being able to be updated with new features with updates?
The 6 core MPU isn’t featured on the XDJ-XZ.
it's not correct what you say that the CDJ3000 (or any process) can upsample a 44/16 file to 96/32 and get missing information back. Or make your files sound better than they did originally. If they do sound different, it's not a result of changing the sample rate or bit depth.
The process is called interpolation. It’s not the same as recording something and plying it back at 96khz, but it is similar to the process of taking the existing information, and filling the missing information with the best guess. This is possible audio and imaging. Topaz Labs is known to do it with imaging both video and photo. It can take a 1080p image and fill information to make it a sharper 4K image. Again, the process is called “interpolation” and is the reason why the CDJ-3000 has better sounding time stretching when Master Tempo is engaged.
hey, quick question: the stacked waveforms at 8:12 , do you need to use a Pioneer mixer / Pro DJ link to do this or can I use any other mixer (MP2015 currently) and get the stacked waveforms as per in your video? Cheers
As long as the CDJs are connected via the Pro DJ Link, you will get stacked waveforms. But only with the CDJ-3000s currently.
@@priyonjoni so they only need to be connected to each other, not into a Pioneer mixer?
That is correct. The mixer being connected in the Pro DJ Link has nothing to do with the library. It’s more for FX tempo syncing, jog wheel LED arming light, as well as Link Preview and Link Cue with CDJ-3000s.
@@priyonjoni thats awesome, thank you so much for your response, really appreciate it. all the best!
Piooner cdj 3000 super
What does that big ass dj scratch mixer do? 😂
Can the rotating jog wheel image be changed to a classic look - like on the older models? I find the new view too crowded + distracting.
The rotation indicator doesn't have anything else on it when there isn't album art. And it's 60fps so it looks smoother than the outdated classic look.
Is there any way to make the new preview feature work with a Xone96? Will there eventually be firmware for that?
I’m afraid not. Link preview runs on the Pro DJ Link which is only available on a select group of DJMs from Pioneer DJ.
Pri yon Joni Thank you, will hopefully invest in v10 soon then
And serato dj? Waveforms with nexus 2 🥹🥹🥹
Serato introduced waveforms on the CDJ-3000 in HID. They did not feature it on the CDJ-2000NXS2 or older.
@@priyonjoni need crackd firmware 😂😂
I am pro dj
Denon SC6000 Is best
waste of money..doesnt make you a better dj or improve your skills.
Simply buying DJ gear has never made anyone a better DJ. But you know what does? Practice. 🤷🏽♂️