Yeah AMD would have similar issues and results. Apple using its own was inevitable. As a geek I am excited. As someone who would never wittingly buy an apple product, I wish them luck because Intel is a POS company and getting away from them is a good thing.
Steve was still looking pretty heathy here. It's been so difficult watching Steve's health deplete over 7 years since his diagnosis, albeit fortunate that he was able to live so long despite being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. We miss you Steve. RIP.
actually who knows they could have secretly collaborated a lot earlier; they did say that every version of mac os was also compiled for intel, which goes back to 2001..
@@poiiihy actually it had nothing to do with Mac OS and more to do with NeXTSTEP, especially since OpenStep came out which allowed the APIs to run on every system.
And I've got one. I ordered a new Macbook pro just a few days before the new line was released, and I got an email from Apple that basically said "Hey, since your new computer hasn't shipped yet, we're automatically upgrading you." Wonderful service, and a wonderful product.
One reason for the switch they were working on the iphone project and needed to divert engineering resources to it. The switch to Intel meant they no longer needed to make custom silicon for the Macintosh line. Now there's talk of moving the Mac to custom Arm based hardware so we would have come full circle.
Ah but Windows 10 is compiled to run on ARM and many windows apps now run on ARM processors as well. There are rumors of Microsoft making a compatibility mode for arm processors to be able to execute x86 apps. Frankly Apple's ARM processors are very powerful, capable, and could adds insane battery life.
Lolwut? PowerPC was made by Motorola and the problem with it was that Motorola SUCKED at keeping the arch relevant for modern personal computing. The switch to Intel was done to enable faster mobile computing which would have been impossible with PowerPC
connectorxp I question Apple's ability to make the A12X or any kind of successor much more effective than a good x86 device. Intel is not dumb or resource constrained. The only chance for Apple is to close their PC ecosystem more and more to make their hardware more effective. And we all know what that resulted in the early and mid nineties.
They were both having a good time with that...good fun. Plus Steve Jobs looked like he really liked that silicon wafer. Of course now they've got their own!
na they wont switch back but they could switch to something different... or maybe not since now that they're gonna make it all themselves so why would they ever switch to someone else... maybe they'd redesign their own processors tho (switch their own architecture or something)
@@MuhammadEhtasam you think Apple will switch back to intel if Steve was still alive? hell nah, even Steve wanted to make and design an own chip. the M chip is Steve’s dream from the start since he wanted to taking control over all of his products.
Steve Jobs had for a mentor the co-founder of Intel, Robert Noyce, who also independently invented the integrated circuit. It was a fairly close friendship. Jobs really had the purpose of learning something from Noyce
Once Don Valentine founder of Sequoia said: I’ve met two visionary entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, the one was Bob (Robert) Noyce and Steve Jobs was the another.
So long Apple - Intel partnership 2006 - 2020. Curious to know how the Apple-designed ARM-based processors will turn out to be. It's exciting for sure.
If you want a fast and customizable machine you have three options, Buy a current Mac Pro, wait for the new one (and buy the old one for less cash) or try building a Hackintosh. My brother (a PC user) did so and loved it so much he bought an iMac, then an iPhone, then an iPad... Hackintosh is THE gateway drug of choice. Good luck!
Both men are dead now for some years. I can still remember this moment as it was yesterday. What would they think of Apple’s decision to switch again, now from Intel to ARM ?
ARM only one part of the chip, it is Apples designed custom silicon. Intel exact same cpu they use in pc's and servers, only thing custom is binning. Apple can add in a far more powerful GPU core, A.I. acceleration, fast and slow cores. Whatever they want! Need extra instructions, no problem. DDR5 yeah no need to wait for intel. 5nm yup can do.
I gotta say...PowerPC was powerful. IBM just fucked up really bad with the G5. Legit it was a really big power hog and couldn't clock at faster rates due to voltage limitations.
i dont get it, if IBM can made tri core and octa core cpu with hyper threading and with more than 3Ghz clock speed for xbox 360 and PS3, why they dont make it for apple too???? thats why apple move to intel!!!
It's a silicon wafer. They start by making these large disks and map the mico-processors to the disk millions of times over. Then each chip is cut out of the wafer, and that's what gets put into your computer.
NonsensicalVids But Intel is falling behind in their roadmap. We’re still on 14nm and 10nm keeps getting delayed. Meanwhile, AMD is getting ready to launch 7nm next year. In fact, there are rumors that Apple is probably going to ditch Intel for their own custom-made processors to put in Macs in 2020.
To all the people making comments about AMD. Remember that the reason this was such a big deal is an architecture shift. Apple went from Power PC to x86. x86 is the architecture based off intel's original 8086 that Intel and AMD both use in their cpus. Any modern Intel or AMD CPU is going to have it's own implementations but it will be x86 based.
@Voxnulla Well P.A. Semiconductor got a 2.1Ghz G5 dual core into a laptop using 14w. Core 2 Duo uses 10-11w(not a idle either of them). At idle C2D beats it with ease 3-4w. I mean by cutting stuff out I can get any IS onto any chip and get it into a laptop, but which one is going to run better?
It was probably a dead unit just to demonstrate their partnership. Just like that guy that made his own chip apart from Motorola had jars full of defective chips in the selling room just to look like they're capable of manufacturing in high quantities so they can spare some chips. Besides that, once a wafer is just slightly handled incorrectly its possible that it is now damaged. If it wasn't defective or damaged, they potentially could've damaged it in this process
Billy O'Reilly, when you write « A Mac is a Mac. Not a PC », it's actually what complacent ignorants (or marketing agents) want to believe, it's not the reality of things. A Mac has ALWAYS been and will always be a PC. The difference is that by using the Intel platform, they've opened up that "over-priced proprietary black box" that an Apple Mac has always been in the past.
XXAlkhatri XX , It goes beyond the semantic. A Mac _is_ a PC, as a PC _can be_ a Mac : the components are of the same technologies, especially in regards to the Intel CPU since 2006, the only difference being a Mac branding patent on an enclosure (the box + servicing) and a licensing fee on a UNIX BSD OS core (which I think is not exclusive to Apple, unless Apple has bought BSD but I don't think so) : it's only a matter of software - including drivers and file system. Software which is compatible with any PC btw, however you don't have the right to install it on something else than a Mac assembled PC (the enclosure + cherry picked components - which are more limitative btw than a non-Mac PC although there's a guarantee of quality there - a quality that can be achieved by any "good" PC though and beyond), that's all there is to it. Apple had almost chosen a Linux core since distributions based on such core can be more powerful and versatile than any UNIX distribution, while implementing new technologies much faster (Linux having a much broader base of developers than any proprietary UNIX based OS, _and_ the fact that Linux was designed as a free alternative to UNIX from its inception, most command lines of some "C-Shell" being similar in syntax and in underlying process design)... But in the end the UNIX BSD core was chosen because it had a licensing charge allowing them to also capitalize on their OS. However it's the same principle as any Linux based distribution : The Mac OS, formerly known as the NextOS (developed by Steve Jobs around 1989 and then sold to Apple when he got back to make up the 1st OSX - yeah it's an old OS), is simply a distribution of a BSD UNIX core which any PC could run. There are also "Mac look-alike" Linux distributions, it's all a matter of GUI in the end... A Mac _is_ a PC. In "the old days" we could distinguish PCs as Microsoft and DOS machines (I think that we could also run "mini" PDP based OS, as well as other flavors of OS that have since disappeared), while a Mac had a different architecture given a different CPU. Motorola 68000 family based, then PowerPC based with RISC pipelining (they almost moved to a SPARC CPU from Sun for that matter but PowerPC was cheaper). In fact, during the Motorola days, an Amiga was much more close to a Mac than a so-called "PC"; I'd even say that the Mac was closer to an Amiga, considering how the Amiga was by itself an overall much more powerful machine including its software, while considering all that was deployed around the same Motorola based CPU architecture (including sound DPS, rich EVGA graphics, etc.).
That was the day, when the Mac became a "IBM" compatible machine. And the "IBM" PC won the race. But the best of all that were, that the Mac users were impressed by the sheer power a "IBM" PC could deliver. Because from that time on, they could really see, how badly their 68k and PowerPC Macs compared to the "IBM" PCs x86 CPUs. :)
Wasn't the PowerPC chip an IBM/Motorola chip? And wasn't Microsoft the biggest client of Apple when they were developing the Xbox, which has a PowerPC chip at it's heart?
Patrick Blampied The PowerPC CPU isn't a x86 CPU architektur the "IBM PC" had. IBM used Intels x86 CPU for their IBM PC and they saw to late, that the chip manufactor is the one, that will earn a lot of money with the PC. So they tried to change that with the PowerPC, but it came to late. BTW the first XBox was run by a x86 CPU, a 733 MHz Intel Celeron CPU. The second generation the XBox 360 was the one, that used a PowerPC.
OpenGL4ever Open NAILED IT! The first Xbox had Celeron chip which are amazing in terms of performance in comparison to the rivals. Most of the cross over ports are amazing on the first xbox in comparison to what PS2 and GAMECUBE could deliver.
That was what Edison said about Direct Current and then 8 years later Alternate Current was introduced and became the definitive type of current across the globe.
it's a silicon wafer. that's how microprocessors are made. each processor are then cut (process called die saw), packaged and mounted on the PCB (motherboard).
@Mishkafofer The AMD Phenom wafer has nearly 1300 processors, I think the Core 2 duo has 1132. Remember the NorthBridge Southbridge etc has to be added and a heatsink.
I've got a machine with a Pentium D from 6 years ago (which is basically a dual core pentium 4) and it's amazingly reliable and powerful. I picked it up for 100 dollars a couple years ago and slapped a cheap graphics card in it, and for 160 dollars total it blows my wife's new 900 dollar laptop out of the water.
There is a joke that went around in the 80's when IBM went crazy for Intel , "What is the difference between IBM and a Cactus?-- A Cactus usually had the pricks on the outside."
"A personal computer is a personal computer. Not a personal computer." Being meaningful requires (in this case) stating that people indeed use wrong terminology. Yes you can install OSX on a "PC", but you're never going to get the experience of running that OS on a Mac. And it's nothing to do with the number of clock cycles you get per buck.
@bouchandre Well, wrong again :) A4 and A5 are DESIGNED by Apple and MANUFACTURED by SAMSUNG and ARM Ltd (which is a british company). A4 and A5 are NOT CPU's, they are SOC's (System On a Chip). Apple A4 and A5 are based on the ARM processor architecture.They combine an ARM Cortex-A8 for A4 and ARM Cortex A9 CPU for A5 's with a PowerVR GPU (from Imagination Technologies - former VideoLogic). SAMSUNG uses these chips in their own phones as well (Samsung Wave S8500 & Samsung Galaxy S I9000).
Can you imagine both of these incredible men are not in this world? RIP guys.
Both? Who's the second one? The astronaut type guy from intel?
@@tabibhassan3376 He was the CEO of intel.
Best persons that lived in this world
Pauls thinking, I'm the CEO of the worlds largest chip maker and he's got me in a bunny suit.
That is how much the boss Steve was
Leon Kernan If I was a CEO I’d be delighted to get to wear a bunny suit
It’s a clean room suit, there’s no bunny ears.
and lots of silicon, kinky
Thats actually not a bunny suit. It's a hint at the early pentium commercials where they wore these suits
Custom silicon: allow us to introduce ourselves
Noice
And now Apple had ended their contract with intel, moving over to ARM processors
they should have just switch to ryzen
Dead pool Their ARM processors are gonna give them even better performance
@@darshan5726 Why move to an Unknown Product in Laptops when they can just make good chips by themselves?
Dead pool But then Apple would have to wait for AMD to make a new chip if they want to make a new Mac
Yeah AMD would have similar issues and results. Apple using its own was inevitable. As a geek I am excited. As someone who would never wittingly buy an apple product, I wish them luck because Intel is a POS company and getting away from them is a good thing.
Still a better love story than twilight.
.. and then the break up
@@avonord hehe
You mean Princess Diana and Prince Charles
Not anymore
Did Intel's CEO just arrived from 2020?!
What's tragic is that he passed away in 2017. Two dead men showcasing a dead partnership.
@@mukiex4413 uP
Steve was still looking pretty heathy here. It's been so difficult watching Steve's health deplete over 7 years since his diagnosis, albeit fortunate that he was able to live so long despite being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. We miss you Steve. RIP.
Two pioneers of technology. Gone.
RIP Steve and Paul.
How was Otellini a pioneer?
watching this on hackintosh
ayyyyyyyy too
I hope it's an AMD ryzentosh
It’s a niggatosh
@@iktn132 w h a t
@Apple ahahaha i am too come get me
R.I.P Paul Otellini.
James Komol Rip Steve Jobs too
Rip David Bowie
Wow I just research him sad news :-(
*_That was a badass introduction lol 0.0 miss you Steve :-(_*
Tell me that when ARM outperforms my 3770K.
Now haha
Love replies to my old comments haha
hello?
Another fun fact, I never owned a 3770K
Wow
Steve Jobs' presentations are like those all time greatest movies that you want to watch over and over again. Very interesting.
Who is here after WWDC 2020?
RIP Intel/Apple relationship (2006~2020)
2005 and might be more like 2021 or 2022 cuz they still gonna be making intel macs
actually who knows they could have secretly collaborated a lot earlier; they did say that every version of mac os was also compiled for intel, which goes back to 2001..
@@poiiihy actually it had nothing to do with Mac OS and more to do with NeXTSTEP, especially since OpenStep came out which allowed the APIs to run on every system.
Both must be devastated in heaven to see that their partnership has ended in 2020. RIP😞
And I've got one. I ordered a new Macbook pro just a few days before the new line was released, and I got an email from Apple that basically said "Hey, since your new computer hasn't shipped yet, we're automatically upgrading you." Wonderful service, and a wonderful product.
One reason for the switch they were working on the iphone project and needed to divert engineering resources to it.
The switch to Intel meant they no longer needed to make custom silicon for the Macintosh line.
Now there's talk of moving the Mac to custom Arm based hardware so we would have come full circle.
Ah but Windows 10 is compiled to run on ARM and many windows apps now run on ARM processors as well. There are rumors of Microsoft making a compatibility mode for arm processors to be able to execute x86 apps. Frankly Apple's ARM processors are very powerful, capable, and could adds insane battery life.
Mistrrr that's right, nothing good when running over 86 at 16 gb
Lolwut? PowerPC was made by Motorola and the problem with it was that Motorola SUCKED at keeping the arch relevant for modern personal computing. The switch to Intel was done to enable faster mobile computing which would have been impossible with PowerPC
Imagine a desktop class A12X with almost unlimited cooling and power draw, it could make things move in an interesting way.
connectorxp I question Apple's ability to make the A12X or any kind of successor much more effective than a good x86 device. Intel is not dumb or resource constrained. The only chance for Apple is to close their PC ecosystem more and more to make their hardware more effective. And we all know what that resulted in the early and mid nineties.
The seamless change from powerPC to X86 is truly amazing!
And now intel to m1
@@Noaddedsalt01 you mean x86 to arm
They were both having a good time with that...good fun. Plus Steve Jobs looked like he really liked that silicon wafer. Of course now they've got their own!
Maybe in another 20 years, Apple will switch back to Intel. Intel, just remember that performance for watt phrase. Apple used that reason twice now.
na they wont switch back but they could switch to something different... or maybe not since now that they're gonna make it all themselves so why would they ever switch to someone else... maybe they'd redesign their own processors tho (switch their own architecture or something)
Apple will switch back to Intel? not gonna happen.
@@MuhammadEhtasam you think Apple will switch back to intel if Steve was still alive? hell nah, even Steve wanted to make and design an own chip. the M chip is Steve’s dream from the start since he wanted to taking control over all of his products.
@@MuhammadEhtasam and that’s exactly what tim achieved now, everything made in-house🙂
@@MuhammadEhtasam what are you even talking about? the other universe?
Bye Intel. This is crazy, though :) I still wish there were some Macs with Intel
@Elie Charbel Pardon me, Intel Fiber? You meant Apple Silicon?
1:13 WHEN U BOUT TO HAND YO HOMIES YO MIXTAPE
Tronald Dump lol that was a savage introduction :-)
Steve Jobs had for a mentor the co-founder of Intel, Robert Noyce, who also independently invented the integrated circuit. It was a fairly close friendship. Jobs really had the purpose of learning something from Noyce
Once Don Valentine founder of Sequoia said: I’ve met two visionary entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley, the one was Bob (Robert) Noyce and Steve Jobs was the another.
So long Apple - Intel partnership
2006 - 2020.
Curious to know how the Apple-designed ARM-based processors will turn out to be. It's exciting for sure.
Oh steve,
you were a master piece for self. therefore, you deserve to
never be forgotten.
If you want a fast and customizable machine you have three options, Buy a current Mac Pro, wait for the new one (and buy the old one for less cash) or try building a Hackintosh.
My brother (a PC user) did so and loved it so much he bought an iMac, then an iPhone, then an iPad...
Hackintosh is THE gateway drug of choice.
Good luck!
Rest in Peace, Steve Jobs ! You will always be remembered !!
*After Apple introduces Apple Silicon -*
Paul : "Get me my freaking brass plate back"
me, 14 years later, watching this on an M1 MacBook Pro
Did Intel start losing their touch once Paul left?
And now they’re shifting to ARM
Robin Faigmane i wasnted to see a similar introduction, but we only got a video of what the apple silicon looks like, heh
djazz haha we cab agree that everything was better when Steve was there
Robin Faigmane yeah. Still excited to see more ARM in the mainstream tho!
djazz agree! Would like to see the future of mac with apple silicon
I'm so waiting for the new 2012 MacBook Pro Lineup! Miss u Steve :(
well, it's here
@@adriananzano2292 you're 8 years late to the party dumbass
DWEGFERG EWFW4ET43RF r/wooosh
Well, it got discontinued now
Adrian Anzano not a whoosh because your joke isn’t even smart
Both men are dead now for some years. I can still remember this moment as it was yesterday. What would they think of Apple’s decision to switch again, now from Intel to ARM ?
I'm sure he world approve. Vertical integration is the dream.
ARM only one part of the chip, it is Apples designed custom silicon. Intel exact same cpu they use in pc's and servers, only thing custom is binning. Apple can add in a far more powerful GPU core, A.I. acceleration, fast and slow cores. Whatever they want! Need extra instructions, no problem. DDR5 yeah no need to wait for intel. 5nm yup can do.
RIP Steve you left behind a legacy
It’s amazing looking back at this and then seeing the leaps apple has made with their own silicon of today. Amazing.
Both of these men have passed away. This is now part of history.
IBM PowerPC master race!
Hell Yeah!
+Dark Phenom (Kavish Krishnakumar) 👍
I gotta say...PowerPC was powerful. IBM just fucked up really bad with the G5. Legit it was a really big power hog and couldn't clock at faster rates due to voltage limitations.
i dont get it, if IBM can made tri core and octa core cpu with hyper threading and with more than 3Ghz clock speed for xbox 360 and PS3, why they dont make it for apple too???? thats why apple move to intel!!!
Ehm *Motorola* ehm
68 people are still using their PowerPC Macs
It's a silicon wafer. They start by making these large disks and map the mico-processors to the disk millions of times over. Then each chip is cut out of the wafer, and that's what gets put into your computer.
it’s 2020 and apple is switching to ARM processors.
Let it be known that I am watching this a few days after Apple announced they will start delivering Macs with ARM processors in late 2020.
fast forward to 2017 Apple and intel both struggle to innovate
intel have no competition apple are all over the place with the macs.
@@NonsensicalSpudz did u just say intel doesn't have competition? LOL. When Ryzen CPUs are still better than intel's newest generation? ok buddy
They’re not struggling to make money though
@@tylertong9928 and what chips are most people opting for...intel.
NonsensicalVids But Intel is falling behind in their roadmap. We’re still on 14nm and 10nm keeps getting delayed. Meanwhile, AMD is getting ready to launch 7nm next year. In fact, there are rumors that Apple is probably going to ditch Intel for their own custom-made processors to put in Macs in 2020.
Two of the top CEO on the stage!
This was done on my birthday. AWESOME.
What's with the reflective frisbee?
top 10 greatest anime crossovers
To all the people making comments about AMD. Remember that the reason this was such a big deal is an architecture shift. Apple went from Power PC to x86. x86 is the architecture based off intel's original 8086 that Intel and AMD both use in their cpus. Any modern Intel or AMD CPU is going to have it's own implementations but it will be x86 based.
This was the moment when Macs became just veeeeery expensive PCs.
+Antonio Kadu acually thats not the case, some imacs have 5k displays and a display like that would cost 1 thousnad on its own
true for me the power PC was what set it apart power PC was so much better in terms of speed
xD
lol those powerpc architecture were obsolete at time.
Carbon cricket FX power pc was stopped because they couldn’t keep up with intel....
Watching on my M1 Mac 😄
apple sure does know how to put on a show.
You will live forever in our hearts Mr.Steve
2:29 Thank you Steven. (Steve Looks down: DID HE JUST CALL ME STEVEN...) XD
Sean Parkes thats his actual name. Steven Paul Jobs
Watching this on my M1 macbook air
Apple is using this silicon plate to manufacture all the new Apple Silicon chips.
One of the best collabs ever
@Voxnulla Well P.A. Semiconductor got a 2.1Ghz G5 dual core into a laptop using 14w. Core 2 Duo uses 10-11w(not a idle either of them). At idle C2D beats it with ease 3-4w. I mean by cutting stuff out I can get any IS onto any chip and get it into a laptop, but which one is going to run better?
In 2006, Macintoshes made their transistion in to Intel Technology, this is supposed to increase performance for better use in Macs
Awesome entrance by Intel.
RIP Steve Jobs & Paul Otellini
rip steve jobs you change the world our dear friend...
Rest in peace, Paul Otellini.
Both are Dead......
Gharu You will never know you are dead
Thank you.
Sent from my Hackintosh
How much d'ya think that silicon wafer was worth then
It was probably a dead unit just to demonstrate their partnership. Just like that guy that made his own chip apart from Motorola had jars full of defective chips in the selling room just to look like they're capable of manufacturing in high quantities so they can spare some chips. Besides that, once a wafer is just slightly handled incorrectly its possible that it is now damaged. If it wasn't defective or damaged, they potentially could've damaged it in this process
They have, it's used in the iOS devices. Apple A4, A5, etc.
So I’m guessing Paul lost the coin toss with Steve on who would walk out onstage in a ridiculous space suit
That's what Intel technicians wear in their factories.
"intels ready" WHOOOOOOOOOOOOO000000000OO0O0O0OOO0O0O00000000OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Billy O'Reilly, when you write « A Mac is a Mac. Not a PC », it's actually what complacent ignorants (or marketing agents) want to believe, it's not the reality of things. A Mac has ALWAYS been and will always be a PC. The difference is that by using the Intel platform, they've opened up that "over-priced proprietary black box" that an Apple Mac has always been in the past.
HawkFest I agree PC means Personal Computer
XXAlkhatri XX , It goes beyond the semantic. A Mac _is_ a PC, as a PC _can be_ a Mac : the components are of the same technologies, especially in regards to the Intel CPU since 2006, the only difference being a Mac branding patent on an enclosure (the box + servicing) and a licensing fee on a UNIX BSD OS core (which I think is not exclusive to Apple, unless Apple has bought BSD but I don't think so) : it's only a matter of software - including drivers and file system. Software which is compatible with any PC btw, however you don't have the right to install it on something else than a Mac assembled PC (the enclosure + cherry picked components - which are more limitative btw than a non-Mac PC although there's a guarantee of quality there - a quality that can be achieved by any "good" PC though and beyond), that's all there is to it.
Apple had almost chosen a Linux core since distributions based on such core can be more powerful and versatile than any UNIX distribution, while implementing new technologies much faster (Linux having a much broader base of developers than any proprietary UNIX based OS, _and_ the fact that Linux was designed as a free alternative to UNIX from its inception, most command lines of some "C-Shell" being similar in syntax and in underlying process design)... But in the end the UNIX BSD core was chosen because it had a licensing charge allowing them to also capitalize on their OS. However it's the same principle as any Linux based distribution : The Mac OS, formerly known as the NextOS (developed by Steve Jobs around 1989 and then sold to Apple when he got back to make up the 1st OSX - yeah it's an old OS), is simply a distribution of a BSD UNIX core which any PC could run. There are also "Mac look-alike" Linux distributions, it's all a matter of GUI in the end... A Mac _is_ a PC.
In "the old days" we could distinguish PCs as Microsoft and DOS machines (I think that we could also run "mini" PDP based OS, as well as other flavors of OS that have since disappeared), while a Mac had a different architecture given a different CPU. Motorola 68000 family based, then PowerPC based with RISC pipelining (they almost moved to a SPARC CPU from Sun for that matter but PowerPC was cheaper). In fact, during the Motorola days, an Amiga was much more close to a Mac than a so-called "PC"; I'd even say that the Mac was closer to an Amiga, considering how the Amiga was by itself an overall much more powerful machine including its software, while considering all that was deployed around the same Motorola based CPU architecture (including sound DPS, rich EVGA graphics, etc.).
That was the day, when the Mac became a "IBM" compatible machine.
And the "IBM" PC won the race.
But the best of all that were, that the Mac users were impressed by the sheer power a "IBM" PC could deliver. Because from that time on, they could really see, how badly their 68k and PowerPC Macs compared to the "IBM" PCs x86 CPUs. :)
Wasn't the PowerPC chip an IBM/Motorola chip? And wasn't Microsoft the biggest client of Apple when they were developing the Xbox, which has a PowerPC chip at it's heart?
Patrick Blampied The PowerPC CPU isn't a x86 CPU architektur the "IBM PC" had.
IBM used Intels x86 CPU for their IBM PC and they saw to late, that the chip manufactor is the one, that will earn a lot of money with the PC.
So they tried to change that with the PowerPC, but it came to late.
BTW the first XBox was run by a x86 CPU, a 733 MHz Intel Celeron CPU.
The second generation the XBox 360 was the one, that used a PowerPC.
Patrick Blampied
WTF did I just read??
Well there you go!
OpenGL4ever Open NAILED IT!
The first Xbox had Celeron chip which are amazing in terms of performance in comparison to the rivals. Most of the cross over ports are amazing on the first xbox in comparison to what PS2 and GAMECUBE could deliver.
That's like saying a Mercedes is not a car because it's a Mercedes.
12 years later, Apple announces that they will no longer use Intel processors on their Macs.
Steve Jobs: Coolest nerd with the Coolest foster parents.
This is the (sad) moment when a Mac ceases to be a Mac, when a great pioneering company becomes a piece of the mass..
That was what Edison said about Direct Current and then 8 years later Alternate Current was introduced and became the definitive type of current across the globe.
it's a silicon wafer. that's how microprocessors are made. each processor are then cut (process called die saw), packaged and mounted on the PCB (motherboard).
No shit.
who is here after wwdc 2020
A Mac is a Mac. Not a PC.
is that a quote or do u actually think that
Billy O'Reilly A Mac is a fucking personal computer
This is exactly why I prefer G4s to G5s. I have an iMac G3, an eMac G4, a Power Mac G4, and then I waited for years, then got a MacBook Pro.
Can someone tell me why does the metal plate on wich they make the processors are rounded?
i would have loved to be at one of these conferences or whatever they are
@Mishkafofer The AMD Phenom wafer has nearly 1300 processors, I think the Core 2 duo has 1132. Remember the NorthBridge Southbridge etc has to be added and a heatsink.
I've got a machine with a Pentium D from 6 years ago (which is basically a dual core pentium 4) and it's amazingly reliable and powerful. I picked it up for 100 dollars a couple years ago and slapped a cheap graphics card in it, and for 160 dollars total it blows my wife's new 900 dollar laptop out of the water.
I'm not a Mac user, so I got to ask, what processor did Apple use before the switch to Intel?
IBM PowerPC
The IBM/Motorola PowerPC and before that the Motorola 68K. Before that the 6502 CPU (Apple II era).
Do you think they will have a brand new OS to go with it and ditch OS X as we know it?
what was the gold flying saucer disk? Windows 8?
Apple and Microsoft are considering going to the lower power ARM platform.
Exactly 10 years later on this date David Bowie died
Actually, PowerPC is IBM's technology, not Apple's. They're used in the PS3 now!
whats with the Powerpc G6 dual core?
Is that Tim Cook in the first in 2:05 ?
SO what cpu they used before that? amd?
No IBM PowerPC
+PsCdita芬兰 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC
What was that disc the guy from Intel gave him?
Joo2oob oh...thankyou
+Jason Armstrong he wasn't guy, he was then CEO of intel
wibas2008 in my experience everyone is a guy or a dude
+Jason Armstrong 😁
LaserDisc
There is a joke that went around in the 80's when IBM went crazy for Intel , "What is the difference between IBM and a Cactus?-- A Cactus usually had the pricks on the outside."
Feat. Retina Display! Have you seen how amazing it is? 220 PPI of pixel density! :)
"A personal computer is a personal computer. Not a personal computer." Being meaningful requires (in this case) stating that people indeed use wrong terminology. Yes you can install OSX on a "PC", but you're never going to get the experience of running that OS on a Mac. And it's nothing to do with the number of clock cycles you get per buck.
Where is the AMD macs ?
Apple Macintosh, and the Intel Chip.
Made for each other.
I might be sounding "bad" but what is that thing Paul Ottelini gave Steve Jobs?
its a silicon disc.. from there they cut out small square pieces and use it as the core of processors
@bouchandre Well, wrong again :)
A4 and A5 are DESIGNED by Apple and MANUFACTURED by SAMSUNG and ARM Ltd (which is a british company). A4 and A5 are NOT CPU's, they are SOC's (System On a Chip).
Apple A4 and A5 are based on the ARM processor architecture.They combine an ARM Cortex-A8 for A4 and ARM Cortex A9 CPU for A5 's with a PowerVR GPU (from Imagination Technologies - former VideoLogic).
SAMSUNG uses these chips in their own phones as well (Samsung Wave S8500 & Samsung Galaxy S I9000).