Why U.S. Defense Plan is BULLETPROOF

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 чер 2024
  • 🇺🇸 What if the U.S. faced an invasion on its own soil? 🤔 In this video, we explore America's military strength, historical conflicts, and the challenges an invader would face. 🌍 From the Revolutionary War to modern defense strategies, discover why the U.S. is nearly unbeatable. 🚀🛡️
    #USA #MilitaryStrength #USDefense #WarOnUSSoil #History #MilitaryHistory #AmericanRevolution #ModernWarfare #Geopolitics #DefenseStrategies #USMilitary #GlobalSecurity #WarTactics #NavalPower #AirForce #HomelandDefense #MilitaryMight #UnbeatableDefense
    #themilitaryshow
    SOURCES: pastebin.com/RZGGEuhG
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @Momula101
    @Momula101 6 днів тому +245

    Not a nation on earth would stand a chance in hell. We literally have people salivating for this very possibility.

    • @quikdraw5203
      @quikdraw5203 6 днів тому +11

      🙋

    • @alexbakker8785
      @alexbakker8785 6 днів тому +16

      The only way i see this happen, is if NATO breaks up, Russia takes control of Europe (and subsequently hyper-millitarizes the continent) and then combines forces with China, NK, Cuba and Iran, and at that point possibly with more countries.

    • @Momula101
      @Momula101 6 днів тому +33

      @alexbakker8785 yeaaa..I don't see that ever happening..as soon as Russia starts taking Europe US will jump on regardless of NATO..WE ARE NATO

    • @alexbakker8785
      @alexbakker8785 6 днів тому +4

      @@Momula101 Well... Donald Trump has mentioned multiple times his desire for the US to leave NATO.
      I also consider it to be unlikely, but still, even if it's a 1% chance of happening, it's still a possibility.

    • @simonpkiss1035
      @simonpkiss1035 6 днів тому +1

      Lol, I thought Chris Wray said China is planning to attack US critical infrastructure, before it can invade.

  • @schoolgirlmellie
    @schoolgirlmellie 6 днів тому +170

    This would bring every democrat, republican, sexiest, racist, homophobic, religious, atheist, young and old together. you wanna see all Americans come together under one umbrella ? well no matter what our differences are you all stand for US and we will all fight for US , as a Vet I take my oath seriously

    • @dirtfarmer7472
      @dirtfarmer7472 6 днів тому +9

      Thank you Ma’am, I never was in the military, not healthy enough, I’d be happy to stand beside you any day.

    • @Harry-Murphy
      @Harry-Murphy 6 днів тому +10

      Thank you for serice

    • @LastStitch
      @LastStitch 6 днів тому +2

      I would help Russia at this time..Tired of America's lies

    • @thomasdelorey2993
      @thomasdelorey2993 6 днів тому +26

      ​@LastStitch At least in america, we call out the bs. If you do that in Russia you go to jail or worse.

    • @Seaneey
      @Seaneey 6 днів тому

      Not Trumpers. They hate America

  • @Mr.Roboto_
    @Mr.Roboto_ 6 днів тому +31

    Also, get this. If the US suddenly disbanded its military, there would be approximately 120.48 firearms per 100 people in the US. This means there's a very high possibility that behind that door, there's a gun-happy American who has been waiting years to finally kill a man legally. Also, Americans own around half of the world's civilian firearms. Finally, every American would be so patriotic that they would fight tooth and nail for their freedom and to, as they say it, "Keeping the peace, and spreading the glory of democracy."
    Don't believe me? Look up "America Fuck Yeah!"

  • @johnstevens6865
    @johnstevens6865 6 днів тому +40

    2A equals a really bad day for invaders...

  • @rickrude978
    @rickrude978 6 днів тому +121

    You didn't mention how many of those "civilians" with guns are trained military veterans.

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +5

      Agreed. But outside the military apparatus, the training won't provide much of an edge. Nearly all training is geared toward unit tactics under the command and control of a well-organized structure keeping you in supply and equipped, as well as supported with artillery, air, and naval assets. A lone veteran, although arguably better than an undisciplined, untrained civilian, isn't going to be much more formidable. Especially when going up against attack helicopters, missiles, bombs, MBTs, of IFVs. We're just as f*cked as a hunter with a deer rifle.

    • @rickrude978
      @rickrude978 6 днів тому

      @@zappothesane4910 Wow, a thoughtful reply. On UA-cam? Who are you an alien? All true, that is why there are so many militias in the US, so that veterans can find each other and go "camping" all the time. The gun-owning veterans of the US could come up to speed a lot faster, and easier than many pure civilians in many cases. Not all. Insert in "train the trainers" like Green Berts and you have a light infantry cell that is going to cause problems. And that heavier equipment. It is veterans who understand already the weakness and strengths of heavier equipment. Weak points in tanks (see Ukraine), best to deal with air assets on the ground. It was the "unorganized" militia that provided a significant force multiplier in the Revolunary war. The Native Americas taught us small cell distributed light infantry tactics. Then the VC, then the Iraqis (or Iranians depending on your opinion), and then the Afghans. Imagin the US veterans and the quality IEDs that would show up all over the US. Very quickly. It gets gross quick. None of the people who caused us to leave (Vietnam or Afghanistan, etc.) could match us tank for tank, aircraft for aircraft. Light infantry with the will to fight. The thing that too many people underestimate is the Christian (and other ideologies) faithful in the US. They think we would not descend into a similar wicked insurgency if pushed. But they are wrong. And a foreign invading force would be ... basically a perfect unifying motivator. And people who make these types of videos should offer the unvarnished truth. Not like the mainstream media.

    • @soulknife20
      @soulknife20 6 днів тому +12

      Man. It's like there's a bunch of veterans who are trained in counter-terrorism that have first hand knowledge on how guerilla warfare works.

    • @joeemick5106
      @joeemick5106 6 днів тому +5

      Even a one enemy per 1 vet killed would be devastating for an attacker. I for one would take that sacrifice for my family and country.

    • @BLACKAAROW
      @BLACKAAROW 6 днів тому +8

      @@zappothesane4910 true, but I think eventually many former veterans in the military would eventually organize the civilian population that owns guns into organized resistance groups...plus i'm sure they would be provided with surplus military gear to be better prepared

  • @qurtmancini5539
    @qurtmancini5539 6 днів тому +59

    Wouldn't make it 10 miles off the US coast 🤣🤣 and magically IF it did, the US has the ability to arm EVERY BLADE OF GRASS 🤣🤣🤣

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +4

      The narrowest crossing is still around 3,000 miles. And we have A LOT of detection capabilities with PLENTY of air and naval assets to address any threat. We have way more rockets, missiles, and bombs than any enemy has ships capable of transporting troops to our shores. They wouldn't even get within 1,000 miles of our coasts.

    • @marianneb.7112
      @marianneb.7112 6 днів тому +2

      And yet, Russian nuclear subs are just off the shore of FL and CA as we speak.

    • @qurtmancini5539
      @qurtmancini5539 6 днів тому

      @@marianneb.7112 which were CLEARLY being watched and tracked BEFORE they arrived and they US was CLEARLY informed that they'd be heading there for training purposes!! This is a wartime invasion scenario

    • @hristohristov7491
      @hristohristov7491 4 дні тому +2

      @@qurtmancini5539 isn't it sad that our most dangerous enemy is internal and the chaos and division that have been created already is the our most significant threat

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 3 дні тому +2

      @marianneb.7112 partially correct, but not like you're thinking. We tracked it every inch of the way as it headed to Cuba for exercises. It briefly came about 30 miles from Key Largo, but has long since departed. This is not unusual, the Russians have been conducting such exercises for many years, and we've tracked their every move.

  • @mowgli2071
    @mowgli2071 6 днів тому +119

    The 393 million guns owned by the civilian population would likely be a factor

    • @Aurleis
      @Aurleis 6 днів тому +8

      That's also after getting past the Navy, Air Force, (state) National Guard (which also has air power that includes F16s), and the various law enforcement agencies. Then there would also be the need to have a sizeable force in order to control that population.

    • @mirceacercega2430
      @mirceacercega2430 6 днів тому

      Over 400 million guns in private hands is the semi official number I see repeatedly quoted in the media, however I strongly believe that we have well over 700 million guns in private hands. Remember, we can make our own guns at home ( don't ask me how I know that) and they are just as good as the ones from the store.

    • @rickrude978
      @rickrude978 6 днів тому +4

      @@Aurleis My state has A-10's, but yes, others have their own F-16 Air Forces.

    • @Aurleis
      @Aurleis 6 днів тому +4

      @@mirceacercega2430 it wouldn't surprise me if that number was correct. Even when Russia wasn't about as scary as a blind robber with a butter knife as it is at present, it's simply not possible for any foreign military to gain a foothold - just with the geography problem by itself.

    • @Aurleis
      @Aurleis 6 днів тому +1

      @@rickrude978 Oh wow, I didn't realize that any state national guards had the Warthog. I knew F16 because that was what W had flown (I don't remember when) with the Texas Air National Guard.

  • @JasperMorgan1
    @JasperMorgan1 6 днів тому +72

    CANADA would fight! The US is our twin and family.

    • @johnnyonthespot4375
      @johnnyonthespot4375 6 днів тому

      If another country somehow decided to attack Canada ?!
      It is honestly kinda quite scary what ridiculous amounts of Hellfire would be brought down on them if this actually happened.

    • @A_Derpy_NINJA
      @A_Derpy_NINJA 6 днів тому +8

    • @whatfreedom7
      @whatfreedom7 6 днів тому

      Honestly I feel like Canada is a true ally unlike a lot of the others. If US or Canada were ever attacked or invaded I have no doubt they would help each other. While European countries aren’t reliable.

    • @solemnwaltz
      @solemnwaltz 6 днів тому +7

    • @sierrarowan5525
      @sierrarowan5525 5 днів тому +14

      💯 Canada is our twin, they literally are our ride or die together country. When Russia showed up in Cuba last week, Canada was right behind them, like I dare you to touch US, and find why Geneva convention was put in place. ❤️ you Canada

  • @scooby45247
    @scooby45247 6 днів тому +31

    the scariest deterrent would be Americas wartime economy..
    if the might of the nation focuses on war, nobody can compare to the output of quality and quantity of arms..

    • @canadian97
      @canadian97 6 днів тому

      While that may have been true in the past, China has since become the industrial center of the world economy. Today, the USA has outsourced many of its industries and manufacturing to reduce costs.

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому

      ...and a population largely familiar with the use and maintenance of those arms just like, passively in their civilian lives.

    • @scooby45247
      @scooby45247 6 днів тому

      @canadian97 that would be the civilian sector.. last I checked, China isn't making American military hardware.. those factories are all here and the civilian factories are all set up to be easily adapted for war production.. not sure why you think China taking rubber dog poop manufacturing somehow changes everything but ok..

    • @soulknife20
      @soulknife20 6 днів тому +3

      ​@@canadian97We have quality and quanity and our factories are able to switch to wartime production pretty quick. China stuff is turned out quick, but the quality is terrible.

    • @canadian97
      @canadian97 6 днів тому

      @@soulknife20 i hope you are right because China is showing they want to catch up to the USA in every respect, especially militarily.

  • @petey118
    @petey118 5 днів тому +10

    In World War II Japan was deterred from invading the U.S. mainland by a fear of American citizens with guns. They frequently quote Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto as saying: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
    This was back in 1943. Its only gotten worst overtime. Now there is 5 firearms per person in the United States. I mean think about how insane that ratio is 5 to 1. That only a rough estimate!

  • @zappothesane4910
    @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +26

    There was no mention of one of the most important factors: supply and logistics. Even if invaders managed to somehow land a force of any size on US soil, they would have to keep those troops supplied. Good luck with that. Any invading force would quickly run out of ammo, parts, equipment, gear, munitions, rations, medical support, etc. Trying to fly or ship in enough supplies across thousands of miles of ocean on a continuous basis is impossible. Especially when threatened and harassed by the best navy and air force the world has ever seen. So, even if invaders somehow managed to beat every odd against them and could land some troops, they wouldn't be able to fight for more than a few days before running completely out of support and supplies.

    • @Aurleis
      @Aurleis 6 днів тому +8

      Very true. There was a reason why Hitler didn't cross the English Channel (20 miles at narrowest point). Because resupplying troops over water without getting your boats destroyed (which don't maneuver very well when compared to a fighter bomber or missile) is hard. Oh and I forgot possible submarines.
      But yes, logistics is an absolute key that is largely nullified by two large oceans on each side and friendly countries to the American south and north. We've seen how a failure of logistics can happen in Ukraine (40 mile long Russian convoy in traffic jam), and this is just over land by the 2nd army of the world. Personally I think they scammed their way to the #2 spot, or maybe the divide between the #1 and #2 spot is just that enormous.

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому

      Spot on. Our enemies know it too. That's why their chief strategy has been to sew discord within, through enormous misinformation campaigns, conspiracy theories and even planting political candidates. They're good at it too. They know exactly where the political divides are, and exactly how to get the different sides ready to fight each other. Today, almost every far-right and far-left meme you see on social media was cooked up in some bot farm in Moscow, or Beijing. After several decades of this, there are those among us who believe that we should forget what Russia is doing in Ukraine and purge each other from our society instead. Those dots aren't hard to connect.

    • @og_swag_daddy9907
      @og_swag_daddy9907 6 днів тому

      Why would they have to do that? They can just come into the country as migrants and buy whatever they need from our tax dollars that the government gives them.

    • @jimjones9239
      @jimjones9239 5 днів тому

      Good point, that will not be a problem if the local governments such as California turncoat and ally themselves with the Chinese.

  • @SelflessHero
    @SelflessHero 6 днів тому +94

    Invading Canada to get to US. That's funny as hell. :D
    It'd almost be harder given how nasty Canada's landscape can be.

    • @masterhec0
      @masterhec0 6 днів тому +9

      if the US allowed Russia to actually get a bridgehead on north America then it would be a relatively easy drive down the middle of the continent via the great plains. the land is basically dead flat east of the rocky mountains leading to a quick and easy drive down the middle of the continent. the only time russia would struggle to cross the land would be during the winter thaw due to soft boggy ground in the north basically the same as Ukraine's ground conditions during the early spring. but once you get to central alberta the land becomes part of north americas great plains with easy unobstructed travel into the united states with no serious natural obstructions or fortified positions. that all being said I doubt Russia would be able to make the ocean crossing without the US denying the invasion.

    • @LaughingOrange
      @LaughingOrange 6 днів тому +18

      I would bet everything I own that the US would help defend Canada by all means necessary. Not only are they a NATO member, but they're also "the little brother"/"hat", and they're too close for comfort if an enemy controls their territory.

    • @screnzoyz7737
      @screnzoyz7737 6 днів тому +14

      And ask the germans what Canadians can do if rubbed the wrong way.

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому +11

      Also, Canada's military isn't a joke. Those guys are tough. The US would smoke Russia in a ground conflict, but if they tried to invade through Canada they would get chewed up and spit out there too, and we would be rushing to get in before the Canadians had already had all the fun.

    • @moistisprobdead
      @moistisprobdead 6 днів тому +8

      If russia can barely if not at all break ukraine, they aren’t breaking canada.

  • @TokyoTraveller
    @TokyoTraveller 6 днів тому +21

    Florida would be begging the enemy to come there and get some Floridian hospitality

    • @WW3_Historian
      @WW3_Historian 6 днів тому

      I'm kinda surprised nobody tried to Hemingway that sub last week.

    • @TokyoTraveller
      @TokyoTraveller 6 днів тому +2

      @@WW3_Historian I know, righ! Floridians are like "please come to Florida, please...I got so much ammo that needs shootin..."

    • @WW3_Historian
      @WW3_Historian 6 днів тому +1

      @TokyoTraveller I'm from Florida and I've heard rumors of a few potshots being taken, but I doubt it happened. But...the government probably would want to keep it quiet if it did.

    • @jimjones9239
      @jimjones9239 5 днів тому

      @@TokyoTraveller and will run out in one day.

    • @TokyoTraveller
      @TokyoTraveller 5 днів тому

      @@jimjones9239 I seriously doubt that! LOL

  • @dogsbecute
    @dogsbecute 6 днів тому +66

    The only way the US falls is if we do it ourselves. Sadly, for the world, we stand strong and proud, even with all our internal bickering.

    • @simpsthreedee3818
      @simpsthreedee3818 6 днів тому +13

      100%. I had never seen the country so united after 9/11. We bicker with each other over our politics but if there was an invasion we would be united like never before!

    • @suvahomescape4665
      @suvahomescape4665 6 днів тому +1

      Nuclear warfare

    • @V3racious3
      @V3racious3 6 днів тому +1

      @@simpsthreedee3818 So you're saying we need to false flag ourselves again?

    • @jeromebarry1741
      @jeromebarry1741 6 днів тому +4

      I thoroughly disagree with you. We have already elected one president who is willing to allow a foreign army into the U.S. without any challenge. Elect another, and we are overwhelmed.

    • @Booz2020
      @Booz2020 6 днів тому

      Indoensians : Free Palestine, URra 🇷🇺, Trade with 🇨🇳, Stop Using 🇺🇸💵
      Also Indoensians : Guys please, Move to BALI 🤯

  • @sbccmichaelkelly
    @sbccmichaelkelly 5 днів тому +10

    Us Native Americans are still here. Hundred of Tribal governments exist and have government to government relations with the United Stated federal govt.

  • @djamaal86
    @djamaal86 6 днів тому +50

    The War of 1812 is offended that it was not included on this list. 😂

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому +5

      The US civil war too. Kinda a huge part of US military history to overlook. Way bigger than the revolution or the Mexican American war, fought here, and initiated by an attacking adversary so why it didn't make the list I can't honestly fathom.

    • @user-jw3vc4od4i
      @user-jw3vc4od4i 6 днів тому +6

      @@stargazer7184 The Civil war was not the same as being invaded by a foreign country. It was America fighting itself.

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому +4

      @@user-jw3vc4od4i What the video says is "the largest war fought on American soil" (00:55) in reference to the revolution. That is just not right. And moreover the video says that nearly half of the loyalist forces were colonists themselves, so your same argument stands against the inclusion of the american revolution in this list. If the confederate army doesn't constitute an attacking adversary because they're born here, then neither do those loyalists who were also born here. Same shoe, different foot.
      It then goes on to say that the mexican american war is "the only other war fought on american soil that involves an attacking force" (02:40). The US civil war began with the confederate army attacking the US Army at Fort Sumter, and they fought on union soil during that war as well such as at Gettysburg.
      I'm just saying that it's a huge omission from US military history, especially considering that it meets the criteria at least as well as the two examples offered do, and to say that the American revolution was the biggest war ever fought on US soil is just bad history.

    • @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq
      @WilliamSanderson-zh9dq 6 днів тому +4

      The War of 1812 is best understood as a proxy war between Napoleonic France and Great Britain. Basically, Napoleon conquered Spain, put his brother on the throne, and then sold Louisiana to the US in 1803. This money funded Napoleon’s Grande Armee. Considering the sale illegal, Great Britain began a trade embargo against the US. They also arrested sailors and impressed them into working on their trade ships since they were at war and needed mariners. This embargo caused The War of 1812 between the US and Britain. The US got its teeth kicked in by the Canadians supported by the Royal Navy, but it held out past when Napoleon lost Paris in March in 1814. In December of 1814, the US and Great Britain signed the Treaty of Ghent, which ended hostilities.

    • @djamaal86
      @djamaal86 6 днів тому +3

      @@WilliamSanderson-zh9dq “The acquisition of Canada …will be a mere matter of marching.” - Thomas Jefferson, War of 1812

  • @foryourinformation9267
    @foryourinformation9267 6 днів тому +42

    We the People are the Armed Forces... FACTS

    • @IDBTitanosaurus
      @IDBTitanosaurus 6 днів тому

      The Military stops being the military the moment they are on US soil. The distinction between Military Base and Civilian land is very real to a soldier. Beyond a US Base "on US soil" is the freedom the military is (forgive the term) brainwashed to believe in its defense. And as an American, Hon, that's how WE THE PEOPLE want it!

    • @corvox2010
      @corvox2010 6 днів тому +1

      Yeah love to see we the people go against the US Military. Might as well make it a PPV.

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +1

      @@corvox2010 Wouldn't be much fun to watch. We the people don't have main battle tanks, attack helicopters, bombers, armored infantry fighting vehicles, missiles, rockets, etc. We don't have anywhere near the same level of communications, command, coordination, tactics, or intel. We couldn't even successfully take on the nation's combined police forces, let alone the most powerful and advanced military the world has ever seen. It would be a long, drawn-out, ugly affair. It would be a war of insurgency and guerilla tactics, and it would be a bloodbath. The only advantage we the people would have is sheer numbers. Well, that, and we would be very similar to the Vietcong of the 1960s and 70s: nowhere yet everywhere at once. We the people would suffer enormous casualties over many years, assuming such a scenario is even possible. I just don't see how the US military and US citizens could be motivated to maintain such a bloody war for any length of time. But the short time it might last would not be very good for we the people. After all, one Apache attack helicopter is better than 10,000 disorganized, leaderless civilian hunters with deer rifles.

    • @MrKim-kv2vv
      @MrKim-kv2vv 6 днів тому +2

      Sad part is currently less than 1% eligible are serving…

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 3 дні тому

      @@MrKim-kv2vv not much to incentivize people to join.

  • @rikashvanveelen993
    @rikashvanveelen993 6 днів тому +170

    Except for aliens 🥵

    • @crocowithaglocko5876
      @crocowithaglocko5876 6 днів тому +14

      Nah we can take em

    • @copperpennies45
      @copperpennies45 6 днів тому +10

      That's what the kid aka the f22 is for

    • @davidboi4025
      @davidboi4025 6 днів тому +5

      We are the ones who were made in gods image

    • @ThePhoenixryu
      @ThePhoenixryu 6 днів тому

      I have the counter to all "USS Enterprise (CVN-80)" A name for the Carrier that has seen us through so much. A legacies name that will stay with our country till the end of time and will always be a flag ship leading the fight to those who threaten freedom.

    • @Cody38Super
      @Cody38Super 6 днів тому +2

      The extraterrestrial kind, we already have in a basement. The other ones, we're gonna have to start s.......well, nevermind

  • @BuddhaAfterDark
    @BuddhaAfterDark 5 днів тому +4

    Correction, the Great Lakes are very much not land locked. There are so many shipping lanes there my friend. Also, have you heard of the great loop? Look it up, would be so easy for the USA to station ships in the lakes if needed.

  • @andrewferris6239
    @andrewferris6239 6 днів тому +14

    Russian army veterans would be very experienced if they were still alive.

  • @mikerage1011
    @mikerage1011 5 днів тому +5

    lol I don't think people remember what the Germans said about the Canadians during Ww2
    German soldiers said the Canadians were some of the most fierce soldiers they came up against.
    As an American and someone who's trained with the Canadians I can tell u all I'm glad they are on our side.
    And someone trying to come through Canada to get into America is stupid as the weather and terrain and the logistics of it all would just make it 3 times as hard .

  • @mateuszpitala9458
    @mateuszpitala9458 6 днів тому +39

    logically speaking, an invasion of the USA would be impossible and difficult to implement, the USA has two friendly neighbors, a river system, Alaska and two oceans, etc., add economic, military and technological domination, plus demographic and geographical advantages

    • @Cody38Super
      @Cody38Super 6 днів тому +14

      You forgot the most important...the populous of TEXAS and Florida! We're better armed than our military and we don't have to follow the Geneva Convention!

    • @denysecoop7356
      @denysecoop7356 6 днів тому +1

      Y’all are forgetting that we’ve had an open border for the past 3 1/2 years, and hundreds of thousands of single, military aged men have poured over them, from countries that hate us (China, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Venezuela, etc…). It’s easy to get a gun here in this country, and if these countries are sending people here who are trained, it could get ugly.

    • @gentnerOG
      @gentnerOG 6 днів тому +2

      ​@Cody38Super you really have absolutely no idea on warfare... captain obvious right here

    • @mateuszpitala9458
      @mateuszpitala9458 6 днів тому

      @@Cody38Super In general, the US population is armed with weapons, not all of them

    • @Techn1colorful
      @Techn1colorful 6 днів тому +4

      @@Cody38Superbragging about not following the Geneva convention isn’t a flex.

  • @JohnKay79
    @JohnKay79 6 днів тому +12

    Winning a war and completing the political objective are kind of two different things, imo. Did we lose in Vietnam..? Only politically... by every metric of WAR we were winning. Same with Afghanistan. Destroying a country/ winning a WAR, is different than nation building through military pressures...lol

  • @navigatingsideways
    @navigatingsideways 6 днів тому +10

    Two mountain ranges between the farmland and of course amphibious and Marines in the air. All Americans would come together. Hell you can include the Southern Border... that's where American gun ownership and the Midwest in the farmlands to protect their land. America has far less soldiers but the topography is a huge problem.

  • @Mr.MaceMan_09
    @Mr.MaceMan_09 6 днів тому +9

    America will stand strong with its allies! And it’s citizens!

  • @petey118
    @petey118 5 днів тому +3

    Video forgot to add that we have roughly 450,000 National Guard guard members between the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard.
    Also forgot to add our IRR(Inactive Ready Reserves) numbers. In which we have 200 thousand IRR in total.

  • @quikdraw5203
    @quikdraw5203 6 днів тому +40

    As a combat veteran living on some acreage in the AZ desert, I pity the fools who attempt to enter our property. The wife and i, and evey single combat vet i know, stay ready. So we aint gotta get ready. Thats the secret nobody else on the planet realizes.

    • @DT-wp4hk
      @DT-wp4hk 6 днів тому +1

      You still need food and water

    • @corvox2010
      @corvox2010 6 днів тому

      And I have empathy for all the people being trained to start a civil war if trump loses. Because thats right out of our own playbook Snowden gave Putin.

    • @frankng792000
      @frankng792000 6 днів тому

      @@DT-wp4hkI have enough food and water for 3 months

    • @schoolgirlmellie
      @schoolgirlmellie 6 днів тому

      as a vet in NC we stay ready

    • @TornadoOfCards
      @TornadoOfCards 6 днів тому

      ​@@corvox2010I also believe if Biden wins again, sometime next year or the year after, there's a very good possibility of a US Civil War 2. Most people are sick of him yet they will still vote for him just to spite Trump.

  • @madhatter2695
    @madhatter2695 6 днів тому +10

    The Japanese did attack and occupy some of the remote Aleutian Islands even though Alaska was not a state at the time, it was US territory.

    • @inthedarkwoods2022
      @inthedarkwoods2022 6 днів тому

      Yeah.. but that was land no one wanted to live on anyway...

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому

      Occupying a remote island in the middle of nowhere with no strategic value is not even close to the same thing as occupying mainland US. One guy with a rifle can land on a tiny, uninhabited island in the Bering Sea and claim they successfully invaded the US. But literally no one would care because it could not matter less.

    • @corvox2010
      @corvox2010 6 днів тому

      And when Obama was in office Putin made it clear he could get a Nuke submarine on the coast of Alaska when our POTUS visited it.
      Closer to this election Closer Putin will come.

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute 6 днів тому

      The last time the United States was invaded by sea was the war of 1812 when britain burned the White House down. The aluetian islands were territory the same way guam and the philippines were. Not fully incorporated into the USA at the time. But, personally, i do count that japanese occupation as legitimate to the record keeping.

  • @samv.g4231
    @samv.g4231 6 днів тому +13

    ‘You could argue that the US was the main agressor in the Indian wars and the Natives were not invaders.’ Not argue, this is clearly the case.

  • @mwg500
    @mwg500 6 днів тому +4

    The War of 1812 is a far more relevant example of a foreign power invading American soil. Our military was just barely being born during the Revolution, and the Mexican-American War was largely fought on land that had only recently become part of America. Our geography and military also combine to pose a SERIOUS problem for potential invaders. Military bases are scattered around the country and our forces can be fairly mobile if needed. Taking out one or two is going to hurt, but we have tons of redundancy. It would take forever to successfully occupy all of the lower 48 state land mass.

  • @BellaandBubbies
    @BellaandBubbies 6 днів тому +8

    So if you think the civilian was significant during the revolutionary era they would be even more so now. any invading army would have to consider the fact that there are 100 million very well-armed, highly patriotic and extremely willing citizens, non-military citizens that will flock to defend without ever being asked. I am sure it's possible to get ashore but at that point if a military did manage to step ashore they would be lucky to ever leave again

    • @jake-px1rp
      @jake-px1rp 6 днів тому

      It just pissing me off that a American president because he had to cheat to win the election because Americans hate FJB and he thinks he's going to let illegal aliens vote

  • @elvergonzalesparado8137
    @elvergonzalesparado8137 6 днів тому +4

    Every empire in history has gotten invaded so don’t think it can’t happen

    • @dextercochran4916
      @dextercochran4916 6 днів тому +1

      No one said an invasion was impossible, just that no roads lead to a good time for any invader that makes it.

    • @WarH
      @WarH 6 днів тому +1

      There’s always one that has something negative to say. But you’ll be the first one looking for someone to help you get that tank out of your living room when they come through it.

  • @bannisher
    @bannisher 5 днів тому +4

    American here. Bring it.

  • @edwardkeefer5471
    @edwardkeefer5471 6 днів тому +12

    This video is 💯 true and there’s no doubt in my mind.. WE THE PEOPLE ARE UNBEATABLE ON OUR LAND… FACTS

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +1

      Agreed. An invasion of the US mainland is the fool's errand of all eternity. Unless teleportation gets invented, invading the US is off the table for all practical purposes. Even with teleportation, I still don't see an invasion being successful. We're too well armed and would be too highly motivated by defending our homes on our own soil.

    • @user-fc5ku2im3m
      @user-fc5ku2im3m 6 днів тому

      14 ракет ядерных , максимум и все. Вы умрете .

    • @georgeharris6851
      @georgeharris6851 3 дні тому +1

      The US is more likely to fall from within than without.

    • @edwardkeefer5471
      @edwardkeefer5471 3 дні тому

      @@georgeharris6851
      Now that could happen and it just might.. Especially with all the shit going on from the Demshits

  • @kevinm4701
    @kevinm4701 5 днів тому +2

    You forgot about one things air dropping in Emus those birds will destroy a naval base in minutes if they aren’t distracted in time

  • @Bultish
    @Bultish 6 днів тому +21

    340 million ppl, 700 million guns 😅

    • @XaviersAlternate
      @XaviersAlternate 6 днів тому +4

      342M citizens, 393M guns owned by them

    • @user-fc5ku2im3m
      @user-fc5ku2im3m 6 днів тому

      Главное, ядерное. А остальное все пшик ..

    • @firghteningtruth7173
      @firghteningtruth7173 6 днів тому

      ​​@@user-fc5ku2im3m well, to be fair, the main thing is the ability to intercept missiles.
      But considering you wouldn't want the entire side of your world to be flattened so you could nuke half of the US, arms DO matter. Because you wouldn't use nukes.
      That is like threatening me with c4 in your hand.
      If I'm dying, you are dying. I am betting you want to die less than I do.

    • @K1forMVP
      @K1forMVP 6 днів тому +2

      Over 1 billion guns in the US Easily probably more like 2-3 billion in civilian hands.

    • @K1forMVP
      @K1forMVP 6 днів тому +5

      @@user-fc5ku2im3mconsidering the US has the most advanced nuclear missiles and relevant delivery systems on Earth I don’t think any country wants to play the Nuclear game with the USA.

  • @briantdt
    @briantdt 6 днів тому +6

    Thanks for helping us France.

  • @user-jgn1944
    @user-jgn1944 6 днів тому +6

    Wow. You've certainly opened my eyes to the Might of the USA Armed Forces

  • @vcupiano
    @vcupiano 6 днів тому +1

    The amount of people who’d stay and fight alone should tell you exactly who should be in charge.

  • @gentnerOG
    @gentnerOG 6 днів тому +10

    Fun fact some of russia's nukes are filled with potatoes

    • @WW3_Historian
      @WW3_Historian 6 днів тому

      Are those targeting Ireland or Idaho?

    • @WarH
      @WarH 6 днів тому

      Mashed potatoes, french fries cheese, fries, and gravy, fries, and gravy with cheese fries.

  • @JossyFoop
    @JossyFoop 6 днів тому +4

    Something that always sticks out to me is how you could easily EMP the United States without accidentally harming many other nations

    • @lonniemcclure4538
      @lonniemcclure4538 6 днів тому +1

      That would really only be useful for some place like North Korea that doesn't have much modern electrical infrastructure, as the US could just respond in kind (from foreign bases if necessary).

    • @smthcrazy
      @smthcrazy 5 днів тому +1

      Seems like someone would have done that already if it's so easy?

  • @michaelmorris4515
    @michaelmorris4515 6 днів тому +10

    You missed the fact the US Navy has the 2nd largest airforce in the world :P
    All of this video is struck moot by the fact that if the US was ever seriously threatened it would throw it's nukes. And the only possible way to invade the US would require nukes.

    • @jamesclugston1626
      @jamesclugston1626 6 днів тому

      You mean third right? The US Army has 400 aircraft more than the navy.

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute 6 днів тому +2

      @@jamesclugston1626 do they? i know the army has a shit ton more helicopters, for obvious reasons. but it has more total aircraft than the navy? ill get my answer through google anyways but i just found that factoid interesting

    • @michaelmorris4515
      @michaelmorris4515 6 днів тому

      @@jamesclugston1626 Helicopters are aberrations of nature that don't count. They can't even fly - they're just so ugly the ground repels them.
      Kidding aside, The numbers fluctuate. And hell, the US Coast Guard's head count of air frames probably lands it in the top ten. Air force sizes are usually gauged on fixed wing aircraft charged with establishing air superiority in a theater. Both the Air Force and Navy can do that. The Army, not so much.

    • @stargazer7184
      @stargazer7184 6 днів тому +1

      Yeah, clearly a land invasion is a fools errand. Nuclear armed MIRVs are more worrysome. Realistically there would be at least a few targets that got hit, and maybe even more than not with those systems prioritizing military and continuity of state assets. If Russia or China threw MIRVs, there is a non-zero chance that you and I sitting at home would be cooked.

    • @smthcrazy
      @smthcrazy 5 днів тому

      Incorrect - US would not throw nukes unless nuked. We've done it before, it worked and took a terrible toll. To launch them again is only provocative to North Korea, Russia and Iran. We're just fine with the deterrent.
      The U.S. was seriously threatened by 9/11 - did we nuke anyone? Regular military is enough and alliances even more so. As many wars as we've been in recently, we've not tried to take territory and say it's ours - that's another difference.

  • @kierancarter8369
    @kierancarter8369 5 днів тому +2

    ...the largest war fought on American soil...The Civil War has entered the chat.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme 5 днів тому +1

    I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @simpsthreedee3818
    @simpsthreedee3818 6 днів тому +4

    Imagine the Russians getting to Compton. I’m just joking but it would be interesting to see what the American gangs would do. I realize they aren’t trained but there’s a lot of them and they have fire power. Imagine all the street cred they’d get taking out Russians.

    • @BLACKAAROW
      @BLACKAAROW 5 днів тому +1

      lol right??? plus it's not just compton, i would imagine most gang members would fight against a foreign invader as well

    • @TylerVoght
      @TylerVoght 5 днів тому

      ​@@BLACKAAROWare you kidding? If they had brains they would join the enemy and take out the real enemy- the JEWSA

  • @TomThatcher-wi2fj
    @TomThatcher-wi2fj 6 днів тому +3

    The US military bases in Georgia, Kentucky, and Florida can also easily fight against a southern border invasion. Also, 200,000,000 American citizens will actively fight against an enemy invader.

    • @ruthclements9852
      @ruthclements9852 6 днів тому +1

      We have wide open borders how are we going to fight I mean we've just invited our enemies in fulfilled all their needs and said welcome make yourself at home

  • @graemepennell
    @graemepennell 6 днів тому +2

    Nothing is bulletproof, just resistant.

    • @aaronwestbury
      @aaronwestbury 6 днів тому

      Too bad the Titanic couldn't have been resistant and people said that the Titanic was unsinkable

  • @mitchellculberson9336
    @mitchellculberson9336 5 днів тому +1

    Admiral Yamamoto said it best when he tried to talk the Japanese government out of attacking America
    He said"That it would not be a good idea to awaken a sleeping giant & behind every blade of grass is a gun & someone to use it".(paraphrasing)

  • @mew454561
    @mew454561 5 днів тому +3

    So we're gonna ignore Canada going all the way to Washington DC and burning down the original Whitehouse during the war of 1812. Which was started with the US trying to annex the entire niagra region

    • @mew454561
      @mew454561 5 днів тому +1

      And what do you mean the Great Lakes aren't connected to the ocean? Lake Ontario is connected to the St Lawrence River (one of the widest rivers in the Americas ) which leads to the Atlantic Ocean.

    • @TylerVoght
      @TylerVoght 5 днів тому

      ​@@mew454561america will fall. No one likes us anymore.

  • @Nicholas-jb2ih
    @Nicholas-jb2ih 6 днів тому +11

    bro forgot nukes exist 💀

    • @ishikaorimura6803
      @ishikaorimura6803 6 днів тому +3

      It's a situation where nukes aren't the factor but militarily instead.

    • @screnzoyz7737
      @screnzoyz7737 6 днів тому +1

      Nukes are overrated

    • @amorris1970
      @amorris1970 5 днів тому

      Why would we use nukes on our own soil?

  • @ArtieArtie
    @ArtieArtie 2 дні тому +1

    Canadians and Americans, we’re basically brothers… even with Mexico.

  • @ssdd4424
    @ssdd4424 6 днів тому +1

    You don’t mention how the initial landings into America would be impossible. Most of the West Coast has cliffs where it meets the ocean. which provides ready-made fortifications to fire down on any invasion force that would have to climb these cliffs. On the East Coast we have barrier islands running pretty much for the entire coastline. So when the forces landed on the East coast wouldn’t actually be on the mainland. While being on perfect artillery range. Where are these terrain features don’t impose an impediment there’s normally a city there which will be well defended.

  • @tubbytimmy8287
    @tubbytimmy8287 6 днів тому +3

    Didn't Japan attack alaska?

  • @MAGA1_4Life
    @MAGA1_4Life 6 днів тому +13

    None. No possible way to invade my home. We are Unbeatable....🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @weeguy52
      @weeguy52 6 днів тому

      It depends as americas assets are scattered across the globe, so with a strong push at home, then it would be easy for americas enemies, but then you would have the gun welding crazy americas but that's dying with the wokness brigade.
      It's americas reputation and nato that keeps america safe and vise versa. If you cast big enough illusion, then no one will ever try

    • @davechilton2997
      @davechilton2997 5 днів тому

      Except that Biden has already let in 20+ million military aged males, given them phones, topped-up debit cards and 4 star accommodations.

    • @kenolson6572
      @kenolson6572 5 днів тому

      @@weeguy52 Not in my neighborhood.

  • @oscarmedina7368
    @oscarmedina7368 5 днів тому +1

    I've said it before but we're like a disfunctional family that always has something to say to each other but we got each other's backs in situations like this

  • @minhdao4790
    @minhdao4790 6 днів тому +7

    Assume that nukes aren't a factor. The actual factors working against any invasion are in this order:
    1) Sheer size. The US has roughly as much land territory as all of Europe, even discounting Alaska. It took centuries to occupy as much of the 48 contiguous states as they are today, and in areas like Montana and the Dakotas, that's not saying very much. Any invader would be starting from scratch.
    2) Disproportionate firepower. Even with the most powerful military, the US failed to pacify any area of the Middle East. A determined insurgency still held out until we got bored after 20 years of being our punching bag. Now take our population: 4.23% of the world total, and 40% of the world's guns. As my cousin who served in the Marines would say, "We may be outnumbered, but never outgunned."
    3) Canada and Mexico. If anyone somehow managed to invade the USA, they would also pose a threat to these two. And they aren't badly armed either.
    4) Lack of experience invading territory. To be fair, the USA doesn't have much experience in this area either. But the point is that the likely suspects (China, Russia, India if Modi really went off the deep end) are not expeditionary powers. They are regional powers. Soviet Russia had true expeditionary capability, when it existed. Now, well, look at Ukraine, and that's invading a nation by land. Anyone trying the same to the USA has to come by sea. That means seizing land near large ports, which will have legions of hostile natives armed beyond the teeth and very eager to make a mess of things. And also, the USN has more carriers than the rest of the world combined. Good luck.

  • @SoldierBoy3064
    @SoldierBoy3064 6 днів тому +4

    it will never happen... any one saying otherwise is making believe in their mind only
    I was in the army special forces... there are things happening that you people no nothing about
    can't explain it but sleep like a baby every night... we are safe

  • @paulman1970
    @paulman1970 6 днів тому +2

    Is Dave Asprey and his BULLETPROOF coffee involved with this?

  • @theseriousprepper4372
    @theseriousprepper4372 6 днів тому +1

    And don’t forget about the general population. There are 400 million guns in circulation with the population of 342 million. Any type of invasion would be met with tremendous resistance at the grassroots level.

  • @neal3944
    @neal3944 6 днів тому +4

    ❤❤❤❤❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪💪

  • @HawkThis
    @HawkThis 6 днів тому +3

    Maybe Texas finally goes back to the Spanish ...

    • @corvox2010
      @corvox2010 6 днів тому

      Why would spain attack us, it would be russia and china... During any civil war.

    • @danielhenry177
      @danielhenry177 6 днів тому

      We're already mainly Hispanic, come on over for that Tex-Mex!

  • @tomaslajara2689
    @tomaslajara2689 2 дні тому +1

    The US doesn’t lose wars, it loses interest.

  • @chairde
    @chairde 4 дні тому

    Near my house here in New Jersey there is Hessian avenue. The Hessians marched down this road so we named it Hessian avenue. Every Memorial Day we march down Hessian avenue to prove that no one else is allowed to be here.

  • @0708Kirkrogers
    @0708Kirkrogers 6 днів тому +7

    "Britain also had an advantage that no invader of today would have, namely loyalist already in the United States." Really? Have you looked at the Southern border lately? I assure you; all of our enemies have thousands of loyal soldiers already in position here in the U.S.

    • @jake-px1rp
      @jake-px1rp 6 днів тому

      have you counted the illegals and criminals into our country our president needs impeached and is a traitor by risking the lives of its own citizens

    • @whiskeyzgaming
      @whiskeyzgaming 6 днів тому +1

      Does this youtuber know about the Chinese buying land next to air force bases??? The illegal Marijuana growing in nation parks by the cartel?? It's insane but Britain's advantage is not special.

    • @nnonotnow
      @nnonotnow 6 днів тому

      Hyperbole

    • @iXSIKOBOIXi
      @iXSIKOBOIXi 6 днів тому

      The other advantage we had in the past (Hi British person here) is that the Militiaries weren't nearly as powerful as they are now for very obvious reasons. Seeing as the weapon of choice was the Musket, it meant that a fight back then was much more even and taking the US would have been much easier then, even though still very difficult. But seeing as it's been so many years since then, 2 World Wars happening in Europe that the US did profit off of nicely and the most spending on Defence worldwide, it's very difficult to take over the US.

    • @quimquim89
      @quimquim89 6 днів тому

      So, the South American migrants are actually soldiers of foreign forces? That's the dumbest thing I've read this week

  • @tq8076
    @tq8076 6 днів тому +13

    Did you not know about the invasion that has been going on for years coming at the southern border?

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому

      Desperate immigrants fleeing war, famine, corruption, violent crime, and abject poverty are hardly the same thing as an organized military invasion. They don't even have the same goals.

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute 6 днів тому +3

      No, can you enlighten me? Who are we getting invaded by from our southern border?

    • @Commenteronnotamenace
      @Commenteronnotamenace 6 днів тому

      @@dogsbecuteI agree but he thinks that Mexico is involuntarily invading us because of all the illegal refugees

    • @zappothesane4910
      @zappothesane4910 6 днів тому +7

      Desperate civilian families fleeing war, corruption, violent crime, famine, and abject poverty are hardly the same thing as an organized invasion by a foreign military. For starters, their goals aren't the same.

    • @tq8076
      @tq8076 6 днів тому +5

      @@zappothesane4910 Wrong, anyone taking money out of my pocket without my permission is the enemy. Did you not hear about the little girl that got raped in New York City the other day that you helped to bring here, feed and house? Maybe you need to start paying attention. We have many different enemies with different agendas including our own government.

  • @firghteningtruth7173
    @firghteningtruth7173 6 днів тому +1

    The Mexican Cartels, "thanks for the equipment upgrade."

  • @DabaksolGuardPost
    @DabaksolGuardPost 6 днів тому +1

    "War would never touch the US"
    Me: Ok, define women
    "civil war erupt in US"

  • @user-hc9tt2ir7c
    @user-hc9tt2ir7c 4 дні тому +2

    Things like this is why I’m so glad to be from America lol

  • @quietprolink5322
    @quietprolink5322 6 днів тому +1

    I am blessed to have served this great Nation.

  • @9hk38f
    @9hk38f 5 днів тому +1

    Never say bullet proof.

  • @trevoncash
    @trevoncash 4 дні тому +1

    Nothing would bring Americans together more than a gun fight against another country. Civilians probably have more guns than the military 😂

  • @budkirn
    @budkirn 5 днів тому +1

    Good info… Omitted the Japanese occupation of Alaska in WW2. The US soldiers that fought some of the highest casualty battles of the war probably didn’t forget it.

  • @TornadoOfCards
    @TornadoOfCards 6 днів тому +2

    Sooo, does anybody wanna try us?

  • @doug814
    @doug814 5 днів тому +1

    You forgot the war of 1812

  • @DakotaOverlander
    @DakotaOverlander 4 дні тому +1

    About transportation the US military wouldn’t have to transport bases of the front when the USA has massive trucking industry that could haul the supplies for them with 13.5 million trucks across the USA that would make the attrition for the enemy difficult from the very start

  • @EyebelieveTheNarrative
    @EyebelieveTheNarrative 5 днів тому +2

    A better question would be how would the Chinese or Russians ever get passed the flotilla?

  • @TrineDaely
    @TrineDaely 3 дні тому

    Something that should not be overlooked in terms of military personnel: If an invasion happened on our own soil, there are a LOT of people who have left the military that would immediately rejoin. They'd need refreshers, but wouldn't be training from scratch.
    There are plenty of them who would also organize local militia and train people on defense instead of rejoining. That's to say nothing of federal, state, county, and city police forces, who also not only have military veterans on the force but also use some surplus military equipment as well.
    There's always a big emphasis on the navy, our blue water force. We also have an extensive internal system of navigable waterways, and control of those and close coastal areas belongs to our often-forgotten green water force, the Coast Guard.
    For additional internal help and logistics, we have extensive roads, including unpaved logging roads and back roads that only show up on fire maps (but are generally known by at least some locals; yes, you can get to Talladega from Florida using only backroads), hobbyist HAM radio operators, over 150k licensed pilots and thousands of small to medium private planes and helicopters along with rural airfields that could provide more eyes in the sky, evac, and general transport assistance. So even if an invading force managed to shut down our satellites, cell networks, etc., there are old systems still in use that could be pulled on in an emergency. Not as effective to be sure, but we wouldn't be helpless by any means.
    We have the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd biggest buyers of explosives in the world, too. US military, Disney World, and Disneyland. There's a lot that could be re-purposed from the Disney explosives purchases. With so many gun collectors there's also a lot who reload their own shells. Add in civilian fireworks, and there's gunpowder available everywhere. Useful stuff!
    I'm sure gun enthusiasts and paramilitary groups have been mentioned by other people plenty, so I'll skip that. When it comes to food exports, a lot of it goes to China, one of the likeliest attackers. One who is having a difficult time self-sustaining a food supply for themselves. Fair bet our exported food to them goes *p00f* immediately.

  • @edwardsp1916
    @edwardsp1916 5 днів тому +2

    America's greatest threat is itself.

  • @solemnwaltz
    @solemnwaltz 6 днів тому +1

    Germany is like America's Vegeta

  • @samizdatbroadcasts7654
    @samizdatbroadcasts7654 6 днів тому +1

    Reminds me of an old board game, Fortress America. Made by the same folks that first did Axis and Allies. Good times.

  • @davephillips9389
    @davephillips9389 6 днів тому

    There is going to need to be a serious conversation about what form of underwater drone will be out there. What is working int he Black Sea, will not work in the open oceans, but a submersible one would. Unmanned subs, can have ones the size of a torpedo up to ones that carry those torpedo size ones, and also can be used to go in for something large.

  • @AZFarmFun-hp1cu
    @AZFarmFun-hp1cu 2 дні тому

    I think the historic models of offensive vs defensive strengths need to be reassessed. With modern man portable weapons & drones, defending forces have become much more difficult to overcome.

  • @delphy2478
    @delphy2478 5 днів тому

    fun thing about those 9 'helicopter carriers'. they can also carry and service VTOL aircraft. like the F-35 carrier variant

  • @boardmike82
    @boardmike82 6 днів тому +2

    This is the super grown up version of my dads harder then your dad 😂

  • @Americanpatriot-zo2tk
    @Americanpatriot-zo2tk День тому +1

    No defense plan is unbeatable.

  • @camdenanderson935
    @camdenanderson935 3 дні тому

    They forgot the war of 1812 as well as Texas fighting for our independence

  • @toddtomaszewski4626
    @toddtomaszewski4626 5 днів тому

    Even the Japanese knew there is a rifle behind every blade of grass.

  • @sclarkmurse75
    @sclarkmurse75 2 дні тому

    Don't forget over 1 million vets, many who have seen combat. The joke is that if someone tries to invade, is those in the country who many are armed and our inner cities

  • @S1LVERF16
    @S1LVERF16 3 дні тому +1

    Bro we definitely goin to war 😭

  • @lasvegastransparencycopwat6705
    @lasvegastransparencycopwat6705 19 годин тому

    I own 27 fire arms on my own in 9 different calibers alone.Soooo good luck

  • @justinfrahm
    @justinfrahm 6 днів тому +1

    2:10 Putin has American allies. Hitler had American allies. More than the Soviet Union had US citizens as allies, which also existed.

  • @sunburntodin910
    @sunburntodin910 6 днів тому

    You forgot the Mississippi River is a major natural barrier. Also in America we have more civilian owned firearms than the military, more veterans than active duty, and most of us know how to hunt for our own food.

  • @jonthrelkeld2910
    @jonthrelkeld2910 6 днів тому

    Don't forget the fact there are roughly 2 firearms for each member of the USA's civilian population of +300 million...and many of them are verterans. That's one helluva malltia.

  • @netherportals
    @netherportals 5 днів тому +1

    focus pronounced fucus always makes me laugh

  • @Wright1331
    @Wright1331 6 днів тому

    "There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass"

  • @Prepping_is_wise
    @Prepping_is_wise День тому

    We aren't that invincible... we are fooling ourselves..

  • @soulknife20
    @soulknife20 6 днів тому

    It's not only the military that is stationed in the US, or the civilian population that can operate a firearm. There's an entire generation of Millennial combat veterans that have been trained in counter-insurgency, counter-terrorism, and a multitude of other types of warfare. It's not impossible to use counter knowledge to perform those actions. And, the fun part. There's multiple different biomes in the US. Desert, tundra, swamp, forest, and mountains.

  • @MK0272
    @MK0272 6 днів тому +2

    How about analyzing US defense capabilities after an EMP attack? No country would be stupid enough to try to invade an intact US. One crippled by an EMP attack, with minimal industrial output, nonfunctional rail networks, mass famine, and unrest in cities might be a different story. Especially if the invader was prepared to feed the citizens in the areas they had taken.

    • @firghteningtruth7173
      @firghteningtruth7173 6 днів тому +1

      Emps attacks on us aren't really a thing. It wouldn't work that well.

    • @lonniemcclure4538
      @lonniemcclure4538 6 днів тому +2

      For any country with a force that could potentially invade the US, what would prevent the US from responding in kind?

  • @joshboyer3655
    @joshboyer3655 4 дні тому

    This was relevant in the 1990s. An iskander missle traveling at mach 5 speed over canada could easily hit any city in America.

  • @sparty94
    @sparty94 3 дні тому +1

    the great lakes are not landlocked. they connect to the atlantic through the st. lawrence seaway.