While I appreciate your insightful thoughts on this. I think there is also a huge societal problem that we have no control over. Notice how most popular songs these days are, for example. It's all about sleeping around, treating women like objects, encouraging men to be as toxic as possible. In my opinion, the biggest roblem is society istelf, and we all gotta do our part to fix it
You have to realize how dangerous this world is though. As a woman, there is no such thing as physical security without a man. At any point ur wakling down the street someone can grab you and we will never hear from you anymore. You and your children. It's reality. Men are the security and providers. Women are the nurtures. This has never changed since the beginning of time. Men NEED women. Women NEED men.
@@IsaiahsAnythingShow its a privilege to say "outdated" when you're in a first world country. majority however don't have that. the nature of things never change. its in our dna.
@@MarkLindor yeah it is a privilege to live in the West. Why are you bringing up other areas unless you live in them? Either way, a man cannot even guarantee physical security, they are a deterrent and a layer of protection at best if they're taking on a traditional role as 'provider and protector '. I don't think we disagree on much, we aren't cavemen anymore so asserting that women specifically need a man to protect them because our evolutionary history suggests so is false. I do acknowledge that this is a world full of danger though (some types of danger disproportionally affect each sex), shit can happen to anyone at this point
@@IsaiahsAnythingShow these "other areas" make up majority of the world. I am just one person. I don't think you understand how men think. When they see a woman alone vs when she is with another man. There is a HUGE shift in how they would approach a situation and their demeanor. And even so, something happens she calls the police? They're men as well. Only in the west people get so comfortable and their reality is so warped that they forget why god placed two genders in the first place. The answers always lie in our roots. Obviously we are not cavemen, but we are still not far from it. Danger keeps peace. Pleasure chatting with you bro, i'll leave it at that
Nah why would i gotta focus on making money and jobs most of the time women wont even approach or show interested even thought we should be the provider i provide for myself
Genesis 1 is not mainly an admittedly ancient account of origins. It is, admittedly, a life-centric, Earth-affirming account. That life-centrism is seen in two main ways, and in a third, subordinate way. The simplest of the two main ways the account is life-centric is that of the exactly five namings just mentioned. These namings easily seem to identify the main three of the Earth's own physical subsystems for mediating stellar radiation for benefit of life: A. the thermally regulative day/night cycle ('day' and 'night', v. 5); B. the thermally regulative atmosphere (special, home-centric sky, 'shamayim', as in Gen 1:8 and Gen 2:4b - NOT 'ha-shamayim', phenomenologically general sky, as in Gen 1:1 and Gen 2:4a); C. the land/sea surface thermal exchange system ('earth' and 'seas', v. 10). The second main life-centric way in Genesis 1 is the seven-fold, life- and marriage-centric recursion that spans all of Genesis 1 and 2: 1. The general, or 'masculine', cosmos and...the special, or 'feminine', Earth (Gen 1:1); 2. The Earth, as its own general subject, and its...special kind of material wealth: its abiding maximal abundance of open liquid water (v. 2); 3. That water, in general, and its...special cycling (the water cycle, vs. 3-10); 4. The water cycle, in general, and its...special beneficiaries: biological life (vs. 11-12); 5. Biological life, in general, and its...special category, animal biology (vs. 20-25); 6. Animals, in general, and its...special category, humans (plant/animal/mineral/physics) (vs. 26-29); 7. The general human and the...special kind of human: woman (Genesis 2:7-25). The third, and subordinate way in which this marriage of the two accounts is life-centric is that of how the Day Four portion of the first account explicitly values the stellar members of the cosmos. The secular manner of valuing those members would be to mention only that realm, unto itself. And it would do so as if its members are best understood as being in a death match against each other, to determine which of them would survive the mutual beatings. Genesis 1 does NOT take after any Secularistic set of values. And, in its Day Four potion, it clearly poses all the 'lights' of the stellar realm as a good family, and this family all working together for sake of life on Earth. But many modern secular skeptics retain their own secular notion of a life-indifferent sense as to true objectivity. So they construe this Day Four as its claiming that the phenomenological sizes and brightnesses of these lights are also the life- and Earth- indifferent sizes and brightnesses of these lights. They think the account is a 'backward', superstitious fairy tale. And so they think the Day Four portion is itself claiming that the Sun and Moon are objectively as big and bright as they two lights appear to us who live ON the Earth.
my name is jana too! i saw this video title yesterday and said to myself "its not for me". then today i see it again and we have the same name, this is for me.
Wow, all of us men can’t even get a text. Can’t even match on Tinder. Can’t get any kind of interest you’re gonna act as if this is some kind of help for the hopeless. It’s truly insulting here and you say this while you have 99 Likes on every platform waiting for you.
I think the issues people are having with relationships in these last few years, especially in the west, are bigger than us, far bigger than problems in individuals. Where I live, a one story house costs one million dollars. Where I live, women hate men. Average women think they are too good to be with average men. Divorce rates are extremely high, and there is a huge focus on abortion. Politicians are obsessed with the right to kill babies, but not the right to raise them in loving, caring and healthy households. Rates of single people are going up. I could go on and on. I can fix problems within myself all day long, but the real problems are bigger. They’re societal and cultural, not personal or individual. The environment itself is now toxic and not conducive to family creation and preservation, at least not anymore. To continue beating this dead horse about “self improvement will get you love” misses the point and the greater issues and is actually deceptive and disingenuous. I appreciate the video and the message, but I’ve heard it a hundred times now and know that it’s not the solution. To insinuate “you’re not good enough to be in a healthy relationship; you need to fix problems in yourself” is a lie, when I know my dad and my dad’s dad and his dad’s dad were all in decent relationships, and all of these people are 99.999% similar to me. My ancestors didn’t have trouble finding wives. But I’m born into a dysfunctional generation and now I’m told I’m the problem when I’m really not. It’s the one lie I just simply won’t accept.
I agree. You're totally right that there are societal issues and they are even getting worse and worse. But what do you think you can do in such situations? The only way to contribute towards fixing the society is by starting with your own self! Our ancestors lived happier and more peaceful due to a lot of other factors as well.. Both women and men were different. In the end, if you think about it, WE are the society.
I found love we were each other world and it's ended with the stupidest way after 5 years I talked to her father and i was gonna marry her after 2 months, but to be honest F*CK LOVE Don't do this shit to yourself trust me no matter how good you are not gonna work out and you gonna be sad of all of the invesments you done in this sh*t but look on the good side LIFE TIME GYM MOTIVATION
let her preach! 👏👏thank you for all this wisdom and guidance we all needed this
Very timely message. This applies not only to women, but to men also. The truth is unpleasant, but it makes us free.
While I appreciate your insightful thoughts on this. I think there is also a huge societal problem that we have no control over. Notice how most popular songs these days are, for example. It's all about sleeping around, treating women like objects, encouraging men to be as toxic as possible. In my opinion, the biggest roblem is society istelf, and we all gotta do our part to fix it
You have to realize how dangerous this world is though. As a woman, there is no such thing as physical security without a man. At any point ur wakling down the street someone can grab you and we will never hear from you anymore. You and your children. It's reality. Men are the security and providers. Women are the nurtures. This has never changed since the beginning of time. Men NEED women. Women NEED men.
so rigid and outdated to have this mindset. last sentence 10/10 tho
@@IsaiahsAnythingShow its a privilege to say "outdated" when you're in a first world country. majority however don't have that. the nature of things never change. its in our dna.
@@MarkLindor yeah it is a privilege to live in the West. Why are you bringing up other areas unless you live in them? Either way, a man cannot even guarantee physical security, they are a deterrent and a layer of protection at best if they're taking on a traditional role as 'provider and protector '. I don't think we disagree on much, we aren't cavemen anymore so asserting that women specifically need a man to protect them because our evolutionary history suggests so is false. I do acknowledge that this is a world full of danger though (some types of danger disproportionally affect each sex), shit can happen to anyone at this point
@@IsaiahsAnythingShow these "other areas" make up majority of the world. I am just one person. I don't think you understand how men think. When they see a woman alone vs when she is with another man. There is a HUGE shift in how they would approach a situation and their demeanor. And even so, something happens she calls the police? They're men as well. Only in the west people get so comfortable and their reality is so warped that they forget why god placed two genders in the first place. The answers always lie in our roots. Obviously we are not cavemen, but we are still not far from it. Danger keeps peace. Pleasure chatting with you bro, i'll leave it at that
Nah why would i gotta focus on making money and jobs most of the time women wont even approach or show interested even thought we should be the provider i provide for myself
I dont exist for women. Im living ghost. Suffer and pain is my simulation.
real
never had any dating experience and that is my biggest insecurity why I don't try and probably never will, no women wants a man with no experience.
Genesis 1 is not mainly an admittedly ancient account of origins. It is, admittedly, a life-centric, Earth-affirming account. That life-centrism is seen in two main ways, and in a third, subordinate way.
The simplest of the two main ways the account is life-centric is that of the exactly five namings just mentioned. These namings easily seem to identify the main three of the Earth's own physical subsystems for mediating stellar radiation for benefit of life:
A. the thermally regulative day/night cycle ('day' and 'night', v. 5);
B. the thermally regulative atmosphere (special, home-centric sky, 'shamayim', as in Gen 1:8 and Gen 2:4b - NOT 'ha-shamayim', phenomenologically general sky, as in Gen 1:1 and Gen 2:4a);
C. the land/sea surface thermal exchange system ('earth' and 'seas', v. 10).
The second main life-centric way in Genesis 1 is the seven-fold, life- and marriage-centric recursion that spans all of Genesis 1 and 2:
1. The general, or 'masculine', cosmos and...the special, or 'feminine', Earth (Gen 1:1);
2. The Earth, as its own general subject, and its...special kind of material wealth: its abiding maximal abundance of open liquid water (v. 2);
3. That water, in general, and its...special cycling (the water cycle, vs. 3-10);
4. The water cycle, in general, and its...special beneficiaries: biological life (vs. 11-12);
5. Biological life, in general, and its...special category, animal biology (vs. 20-25);
6. Animals, in general, and its...special category, humans (plant/animal/mineral/physics) (vs. 26-29);
7. The general human and the...special kind of human: woman (Genesis 2:7-25).
The third, and subordinate way in which this marriage of the two accounts is life-centric is that of how the Day Four portion of the first account explicitly values the stellar members of the cosmos. The secular manner of valuing those members would be to mention only that realm, unto itself. And it would do so as if its members are best understood as being in a death match against each other, to determine which of them would survive the mutual beatings.
Genesis 1 does NOT take after any Secularistic set of values. And, in its Day Four potion, it clearly poses all the 'lights' of the stellar realm as a good family, and this family all working together for sake of life on Earth.
But many modern secular skeptics retain their own secular notion of a life-indifferent sense as to true objectivity. So they construe this Day Four as its claiming that the phenomenological sizes and brightnesses of these lights are also the life- and Earth- indifferent sizes and brightnesses of these lights. They think the account is a 'backward', superstitious fairy tale. And so they think the Day Four portion is itself claiming that the Sun and Moon are objectively as big and bright as they two lights appear to us who live ON the Earth.
Needed that, thank you. I also love the way you state your arguments, you're very clear. 👈
I really feel comfortable listening to you
You always talk about relatable topics. Love your videos ❤.
I think this is God's way of answering a question I asked, cause this popped up on my fyp yet never knew about it
You’re ahead of your time 🙌
as someone who doesn't believe in god, how shall I think about the future?
They only want what they can’t have
Thankyou so much This helped me a lot ❤❤
Yeah loves not for me but dang stole my heart already wit that intro
The timing is crazy girl ❤
my name is jana too! i saw this video title yesterday and said to myself "its not for me". then today i see it again and we have the same name, this is for me.
🫶🏻
this is like unintentional asmr
Wow, all of us men can’t even get a text. Can’t even match on Tinder. Can’t get any kind of interest you’re gonna act as if this is some kind of help for the hopeless. It’s truly insulting here and you say this while you have 99 Likes on every platform waiting for you.
I think the issues people are having with relationships in these last few years, especially in the west, are bigger than us, far bigger than problems in individuals. Where I live, a one story house costs one million dollars. Where I live, women hate men. Average women think they are too good to be with average men. Divorce rates are extremely high, and there is a huge focus on abortion. Politicians are obsessed with the right to kill babies, but not the right to raise them in loving, caring and healthy households. Rates of single people are going up. I could go on and on.
I can fix problems within myself all day long, but the real problems are bigger. They’re societal and cultural, not personal or individual. The environment itself is now toxic and not conducive to family creation and preservation, at least not anymore.
To continue beating this dead horse about “self improvement will get you love” misses the point and the greater issues and is actually deceptive and disingenuous. I appreciate the video and the message, but I’ve heard it a hundred times now and know that it’s not the solution. To insinuate “you’re not good enough to be in a healthy relationship; you need to fix problems in yourself” is a lie, when I know my dad and my dad’s dad and his dad’s dad were all in decent relationships, and all of these people are 99.999% similar to me. My ancestors didn’t have trouble finding wives. But I’m born into a dysfunctional generation and now I’m told I’m the problem when I’m really not. It’s the one lie I just simply won’t accept.
I agree. You're totally right that there are societal issues and they are even getting worse and worse. But what do you think you can do in such situations? The only way to contribute towards fixing the society is by starting with your own self! Our ancestors lived happier and more peaceful due to a lot of other factors as well.. Both women and men were different. In the end, if you think about it, WE are the society.
I found love
we were each other world
and it's ended with the stupidest way after 5 years I talked to her father and i was gonna marry her after 2 months, but to be honest F*CK LOVE Don't do this shit to yourself trust me no matter how good you are not gonna work out and you gonna be sad of all of the invesments you done in this sh*t but look on the good side LIFE TIME GYM MOTIVATION
love your tempo of speaking
oh god thank you i never had attract someone to me so that mean im special and my reflect dosen't existe
Hello there....💫
are you syrian?
hope not j3wish