you were so close on making it look realistic. I feel like the angle you chose for your character was a bit far away and for the colors and the compositing needed a bit more work, but overall this was really amazing, the way you recreated everything was truly like a pro
Spot on. Some color work could be done to pull it all together a bit. I think he could also have done a rough model of his terrain for the ground effect to interact with, or simply warp it in compositing. It's strange for the shockwave to be flat on a mountainous terrain. The $20 thing was probably just for the youtube title. The dirt explosion wouldn't be much harder to make in Houdini, he could have done it himself. But the true cost that he's comparing to (that of the Iron Man VFX budget) includes labor, software licenses, hardware, and the other 99% of the movie.
@@Docfly62 well... how many hours did he spend on this and on learning skills? This is the most expensive part. I'm pretty sure he won't work for free
@@SerhiiBelman Yes time is money..Who doesn't know that. So the F what. Everything takes time to accomplish. You have not refuted his claim that the project cost him $20 out of pocket to purchase what was needed to complete the task.
@@Docfly62Yeah but the point of the video is the "20$ price". I am pretty sure this same scene in Iron Man would cost even in 2024 hundreds of thousands of dollars. But those money goes to the people who made these VFX in fact for FREE, only spent time on editing. So this "20$" price tag of this video is kinda...
@@erikdoesvfx Anyway, awesome video man! You have got some great skills in Houdini AND Nuke. A real wind/blow on your clothes would add that small touch of connection from the plate to the sim stuff. But still, awesome job! Subscribed and can't wait for more!
Taking into consideration the fact that you didn't have millions of dollars in equipment this is pretty freaking amazing. And what an enjoyable process to watch. Thanks so much for the video
I did a 3 year course in animation and graphics and got my degree then got bored with animation due to having done it for 3 years. You may have just rekindled my spirit because after watching this and seeing what houdini is capable of, I am motivated
if it was shot in some deserted environment, it would have looked much better as with this much green grass there will be no dust waves shooting out, so the brain tells you subconsciously that this is unrealistic. but the simulations and all the work behind this was super cool. loved the way you explain everything!!
@@erikdoesvfx I dont think its the sand vs grass issue, mora that the grass doesn't seem to react to the shockwave.I think if you simulated grass getting squashed just ahead of the wave it would make this perfect!
The only thing I wish was done a bit better, were the small rockets right after release because they all are pointing the same direction, meanwhile in the movie, they point different directions and after they are ignited, they seem to be navigated. Anyway I loved this AND the water animation as well :)
that 1:18 curtain shot was damn funny i was like "man i really need automated curtains" and in the next shot i realized it was your girlfriend and i was like haha...and then i realized i dont have that too and became more sad anyways your vfx is awesome bro keep it up subbed
It’s pretty close. I think your CG elements are a little too saturated/clean and your compositing of the foreground character not quite there yet. The animation and 3D stuff is pretty awesome. You have a new subscriber.
with all the work you put into the simulations I feel like you probably should have gotten a 3d or lidar scan scan of the area as well, or atlleast modeled a rough version of the terrain. Giving the simulations something physical to interact with give it a more realistic feel and make compositing easier.
Hi, I think there is an issue with the sound. The sound of the explosion should be delayed. First, you see the explosion, then you hear the sound (if the explosion is not near you). At a distance of 5 km from the missile explosion, the sound will reach you in 2-3 seconds, so keep that in mind. Also, the sound should start at maximum volume and then fade out. It shouldn't gradually increase to maximum before fading.
This comment is very accurate. Dont forget that the ground recieve the impact, so its not to wrong to think about 3 or 4 seconds of delay since the presion come from the explosion, its not just a sou d of voice, like the Beirut Explosion of 2020. The same point was said it by my 9 years old son. And i told him... first to all its a very good video and its a lot of work behind. Greetings from a latin physicist with a rusty english.
Unfortunately, I witnessed the explosions caused by russian (Fucking) missiles, and this is not just an assumption but my personal experience (which I would have preferred not to have).
The thing wrong with 99% of these comparisons is they either say the films total budget which covers catering,makeup,insurance ,salaries,camera rentals,location rental etc for the WHOLE film. Or they only mention VFX budget which they rarely do because rarely public information. The reality is some million dollar movies have $500 shots in it. Not saying this is one but the reality is this shot even for them didn’t cost millions. Great work though!
@@Oscar-of5ni VFX studios also charge a lot but the issue is it’s a bidding war between ILM Weta digital,digital domain and others where each studio says they can get x number of shots done for x amount so with a 200 million dollar project with maybe 1 million being allocated to VFX that 1 million disappears fast with technical rigging builds and VFX supervisor transport pay and housing during production that eventually a lot of shots get done for near nothing to stick within the number of shots in their contract within the budget allocated and sometimes at the VFX studios expense
@@CirylGaneWillReturn correct but in a lot of cases also the man hours are spread out across shots. A lot of VFX houses now rely on generalists to get a lot of shots out so a lot may have went through 5-10 departments but also a lot are done by 1-2 guys stuck at a computer with a 5 day deadline.
I think one thing you get it wrong is light travels faster than sound. İf you slow it down the video and watch frame by frame your explosion audio actually plays even before missiles hit the ground. Ofc other than this it looks awesome! Well done!
Of course one can recreate a 1.5 decades old movie’s effects with technology from 2024. Now if one can recreate it with the same tech they used back then, that would marvelous.
I clicked just to see if there were any comments that bad. And, bingo ! 1. The smoke doesn't react to the environment and doesn't surround the actor. 2. The camera shakes are not interesting and look cheap. 3. There is no impact with a delay like the director wanted. 4. Because of the smoke, we don't see the editing long enough to understand the set before the explosion. (you know the movie before you see the second scene) 5. Interesting to know that this man works for free. 6. This is a good scene for a mid-budget movie.
@@theplouf5533 No need to pixel fucking here - outside of the film studios, clients wants only ROI and results. this is an overkill for most clients work outside of Hollywood.
You've made it with the tech we have nowadays - let's see you creating and innovating to the skills level of current marvel vfx and creativity. Sweet work!!
Great work! As an "audience member" the one thing I really prefer in the original is when the 24 mini rockets pop out, they all do so with more random orientations. So when they activate you see cool curved smoke trails as they reorient themselves to get back on target. I find this more visually interesting/dynamic and less artificial/"procedural" looking (even if in reality your version where they all pop out more or less facing the same direction might be technically more accurate).
the recreation for me is physically more accurate than the original. Aerodynamically speaking the fins on the rockets would help the rockets stay pointed in the direction of flight, that is why they are there. drop a bomb from a bomb rack on a b17 bomber and the bomb will still go in the direction the plane is flying. force is a vector. Adding a side ways force to an object in flight will only cause small deviation in the direction of travel, but small deviations can turn into a big mess if you are trying to be precise. that missile wasn't meant to be precise. it was meant to destroy a large area with as little effort as possible
amazing work! gonna leave a like and subscribe. also for some reason at 4:56 when you drop the missile model and it shatters made me laugh out loud. I think my humor is broken lol.
Having already Houdini, Nuke, Davinci, the tesla, the drone, the camera and gear's camera is a plus, we're not gonna lie on this, with that said, yes, this shot cost only $20😂😂 Excellent work, it's juste mind blowing !!
I understand the title being what it is to get the clicks. I just hope studio execs don't see this kind of thing and continue to undervalue VFX artists like yourselves work. It's amazing and important
One big difference is that tony's clothes react to the shockwave by billowing, your clothes don't. Also the missiles after popping out don't spread out far enough to fall over such a wide area, they look like more of a cluster bombardment of a smaller area
this video prooves why photorealistic vfx are being made by 500 people during the whole year and not by one noname noob who just wants to sell a course to more noobs.
What about his chair? And the coffee in his cup? Or the house he produces from... or his monitor! You are all being ridiculous. By all means, compare $3,220 to $140,000,000 instead.
The title as it is right now feels misleading. Great work for the project, but a better title would be "remaking VFX of iron man DIY" or something. You are using professional equipment which has nothing to do with budget production of 20 $. In 2024 just the loan of 1 hour of working might already exceeds 20 $.
You spent more than $20 just in electricity driving around looking for the perfect place to take your shot. How much did that computer cost? How much did the suit you wore cost? How long did it take you? What is your time worth? I'm sure you also ate food during this process how much did all that cost? $20....pshhh 😂
Why does someone say, that it is better than the Iron Man scene? For 20$ is good, but... there are ZERO physical interactions. You have just a good visual, because of software, but it looks fake and chip.
after watching you explained and edited your video, I watched your compare of Ironman shot and your video and both shots gave me goosebump! it was almost great! Just little more details and more realistic. I would rate your shot 9/10 😁👍
Wow, this was epic. I do love watching these kinds of videos, purely for the entertainment. The recreation was brilliant. You should do the White House explosion from Independence Day
I love seeing random youtubers showing up huge studios! reminds me of the super man lip problem that some dude fixed with his home computer better than the studios did
It was an excellent effort for the amount of resources and time spent on the project. Gotta say though that the original scene looks more realistic in multiple areas.
Its always amusing when someone does something and makes it look easy but you know it isn't actually easy. This is a perfect example of that. Oh yeah I just did this and this, I mean I don't know personally never tried it but anytime I try to do video or image editing I cry.
It looks awesome! I wish i could do all that VFX stuff. Not 20$ though. 1) You need a very good PC. 2) Software costs some money. 3) You need knowledge that takes a lot of time to master. But the result is fantastic 👍
Dude, the number of people picking at the title, the fact you drove a Tesla, or the colours were not perfect. Ffs, people really love to hate. This was absolutely incredible. Great job 😎🫰👍
This is incredible work. Amazing. What a time to be alive! Just one tiny thing...if you were paying yourself then it would be more than $20 for a week's work.
Well, that's how technical improvements work. Somebody has an idea, creates a very complicated method to make it happen, and later on a bunch of companies do their best to use this idea and make it "clickable" for everybody. So comparing a multi million dollar movie to a 20 dollar software, over 15 years later, isn't right. It just shows, how complicated things can get overused and made simple in the handling. That's what happens to everything, especially for everyday products like TV sets for instance. Inventing the first mobile phone in the 80s was a hard task, going from there to the iPhones of today is just evolution combined with other benefits like shrinking structures over time. edit: I read my words again, and I don't want to reduce the result of your work. The resulting video is awesome. So my respect, looks great.
Bro you made that looks so freaking awesome!. I will yes your does look more like a napalm type strike. While Tony's looks more like a concussion force. But over all 10/10 👍
I am not the VFX engineer but few notes that could improve the effect: - when small rockets are released from main rocket their release animation is to linear, I would add more eased in-out curve to add the animation dynamic, - there is also lack of "kick" when small rockets' engines are lid
What movie/show should I recreate next?
Make something from Star Trek next gen
maybe something like "ready player one"
Matrix
One with pretty bad GCI, like Scorpion King reveal, or final fight in Madame Web.
How about tron?
you were so close on making it look realistic. I feel like the angle you chose for your character was a bit far away and for the colors and the compositing needed a bit more work, but overall this was really amazing, the way you recreated everything was truly like a pro
that would be 25 dollars.
Renklendirmede hata vardı drone çekiminde yeşillikler çok parlaktı diğer açıda farklı renkler var, Vfx harika ama renkler değildi
@@davititchanturia Lol
😂😂@@davititchanturia
Spot on. Some color work could be done to pull it all together a bit. I think he could also have done a rough model of his terrain for the ground effect to interact with, or simply warp it in compositing. It's strange for the shockwave to be flat on a mountainous terrain.
The $20 thing was probably just for the youtube title. The dirt explosion wouldn't be much harder to make in Houdini, he could have done it himself. But the true cost that he's comparing to (that of the Iron Man VFX budget) includes labor, software licenses, hardware, and the other 99% of the movie.
Bro that camera, drone, and software looks like its worth way more than $20
He did not purchase them for this project. Pretty sure those things he already owned.
He already owned em
@@Docfly62 well... how many hours did he spend on this and on learning skills? This is the most expensive part. I'm pretty sure he won't work for free
@@SerhiiBelman Yes time is money..Who doesn't know that. So the F what. Everything takes time to accomplish. You have not refuted his claim that the project cost him $20 out of pocket to purchase what was needed to complete the task.
@@Docfly62Yeah but the point of the video is the "20$ price". I am pretty sure this same scene in Iron Man would cost even in 2024 hundreds of thousands of dollars. But those money goes to the people who made these VFX in fact for FREE, only spent time on editing. So this "20$" price tag of this video is kinda...
"How I did it using only 20$"
-> Proceeds to ride a Tesla on a mountain trail instead of walking.
Hiking boots were not in the budget 🤷♂️
@@erikdoesvfx Anyway, awesome video man! You have got some great skills in Houdini AND Nuke.
A real wind/blow on your clothes would add that small touch of connection from the plate to the sim stuff. But still, awesome job! Subscribed and can't wait for more!
Well, technically, He didn't bought the Tesla FOR this shot specifically xD
you could afford a tesla, it's not a ferrari
I am sure travel costs are typically part of a movie budget, so yes, $20 budget is a lie.
Taking into consideration the fact that you didn't have millions of dollars in equipment this is pretty freaking amazing. And what an enjoyable process to watch. Thanks so much for the video
I did a 3 year course in animation and graphics and got my degree then got bored with animation due to having done it for 3 years.
You may have just rekindled my spirit because after watching this and seeing what houdini is capable of, I am motivated
getting bored happens to all of us, you'll find your way again, no doubt
Sounds like what happened to me with my photography degree.
Love your workflow and final result!
Really appreciate it!!
I am also super impressed. Whatever that is worth.
if it was shot in some deserted environment, it would have looked much better as with this much green grass there will be no dust waves shooting out, so the brain tells you subconsciously that this is unrealistic. but the simulations and all the work behind this was super cool. loved the way you explain everything!!
that’s true
I agree! Was just not feeling like booking a flight to the desert for this video haha
@@erikdoesvfxlol
@@erikdoesvfx Would have been funny to have a 1000 dollar video where you only spend 20 dollars on the VFX XD
@@erikdoesvfx I dont think its the sand vs grass issue, mora that the grass doesn't seem to react to the shockwave.I think if you simulated grass getting squashed just ahead of the wave it would make this perfect!
I thought this was gonna be so mid, my expectations were low, but I'm very impressed. This is amazing
That was seriously awesome
The only thing I wish was done a bit better, were the small rockets right after release because they all are pointing the same direction, meanwhile in the movie, they point different directions and after they are ignited, they seem to be navigated.
Anyway I loved this AND the water animation as well :)
that 1:18 curtain shot was damn funny
i was like "man i really need automated curtains"
and in the next shot i realized it was your girlfriend and i was like haha...and then i realized i dont have that too and became more sad
anyways your vfx is awesome bro
keep it up
subbed
Ikea sells quite affordable electric blinds ;)
Jajajajaj
@@itisabirdDoes IKEA sell GFs ? 🥲
LMAO
Thanks for explaining the joke, I didn't get it at first.
It’s pretty close. I think your CG elements are a little too saturated/clean and your compositing of the foreground character not quite there yet. The animation and 3D stuff is pretty awesome. You have a new subscriber.
I was going to say this. There's no atmospheric perspective here.
Ya I was gonna say that, he didn’t blend any of it well. The colors are too bright and don’t match the scenery. Makes it look cartoonish
with all the work you put into the simulations I feel like you probably should have gotten a 3d or lidar scan scan of the area as well, or atlleast modeled a rough version of the terrain. Giving the simulations something physical to interact with give it a more realistic feel and make compositing easier.
He even had the drone on site already to create a model with photogrammetry
This is art dude. Pure art🥶❤
Hi, I think there is an issue with the sound. The sound of the explosion should be delayed. First, you see the explosion, then you hear the sound (if the explosion is not near you). At a distance of 5 km from the missile explosion, the sound will reach you in 2-3 seconds, so keep that in mind. Also, the sound should start at maximum volume and then fade out. It shouldn't gradually increase to maximum before fading.
Thats a pretty bad math my friend… since sound travels 350m/s …3s would be roughly just 1km… and 5km -> 15s 👍
This comment is very accurate. Dont forget that the ground recieve the impact, so its not to wrong to think about 3 or 4 seconds of delay since the presion come from the explosion, its not just a sou d of voice, like the Beirut Explosion of 2020. The same point was said it by my 9 years old son. And i told him... first to all its a very good video and its a lot of work behind.
Greetings from a latin physicist with a rusty english.
Unfortunately, I witnessed the explosions caused by russian (Fucking) missiles, and this is not just an assumption but my personal experience (which I would have preferred not to have).
@@Archesio_Palackanteyou may be accurate but Cinema can feel real without actually being real
Heck yeah my dude! Love seeing something longer form from you! Crushed it!!
Ahh thank you so much Jordan! Big fan of you and the crew at Corridor! The Corridor Crew videos are a big reason for why I got into VFX :)
THATS WHAT SHE SAID
I think YT sent me here from my love of Corridor.
The thing wrong with 99% of these comparisons is they either say the films total budget which covers catering,makeup,insurance ,salaries,camera rentals,location rental etc for the WHOLE film. Or they only mention VFX budget which they rarely do because rarely public information. The reality is some million dollar movies have $500 shots in it. Not saying this is one but the reality is this shot even for them didn’t cost millions. Great work though!
Yes, only color correction people at the technicolor studio in los angeles charge from 300 to 500 pero hour
@@Oscar-of5ni VFX studios also charge a lot but the issue is it’s a bidding war between ILM Weta digital,digital domain and others where each studio says they can get x number of shots done for x amount so with a 200 million dollar project with maybe 1 million being allocated to VFX that 1 million disappears fast with technical rigging builds and VFX supervisor transport pay and housing during production that eventually a lot of shots get done for near nothing to stick within the number of shots in their contract within the budget allocated and sometimes at the VFX studios expense
just check how much ridiculously they spend on she hulk series.
It also doesn't consider man-hours, which is the primary expense in VFX.
@@CirylGaneWillReturn correct but in a lot of cases also the man hours are spread out across shots. A lot of VFX houses now rely on generalists to get a lot of shots out so a lot may have went through 5-10 departments but also a lot are done by 1-2 guys stuck at a computer with a 5 day deadline.
I think one thing you get it wrong is light travels faster than sound. İf you slow it down the video and watch frame by frame your explosion audio actually plays even before missiles hit the ground. Ofc other than this it looks awesome! Well done!
oh man, your girl at the windows closing it as if it was automated, what a shot, that makes me laugh A LOT!
Great video
As an Indian, You created more better VFX than most of the big budget Indian movies. Well done it was amazing👍🏻
Woooooow!! So sick!!
Means a lot Andreas!
Bro you just slayed a million dollar shot.. fucking epic
Of course one can recreate a 1.5 decades old movie’s effects with technology from 2024.
Now if one can recreate it with the same tech they used back then, that would marvelous.
What is F ward?
@@madebyut logic right there.
I clicked just to see if there were any comments that bad. And, bingo !
1. The smoke doesn't react to the environment and doesn't surround the actor.
2. The camera shakes are not interesting and look cheap.
3. There is no impact with a delay like the director wanted.
4. Because of the smoke, we don't see the editing long enough to understand the set before the explosion. (you know the movie before you see the second scene)
5. Interesting to know that this man works for free.
6. This is a good scene for a mid-budget movie.
@@theplouf5533 No need to pixel fucking here - outside of the film studios, clients wants only ROI and results. this is an overkill for most clients work outside of Hollywood.
Very good for a second video, i wanna see how you would do Oppenheimer scenes
That would be very interesting to recreate! But I need a small break from explosions after this 😅
You've made it with the tech we have nowadays - let's see you creating and innovating to the skills level of current marvel vfx and creativity.
Sweet work!!
Dude....at this point you should just make your own epic movies 😂😂 this is top notch movie quality
At 1:20 !! My gosh! So creative! Made me laugh for 2 minutes!
Solid intro!
Thanks Caleb! Had a lot of fun with it
@@erikdoesvfx killer work!
7:25 this is super funny, it looks like you're to close and shock wave killed you lmao
Better than the original one. Congratulations. :)
Great work! As an "audience member" the one thing I really prefer in the original is when the 24 mini rockets pop out, they all do so with more random orientations. So when they activate you see cool curved smoke trails as they reorient themselves to get back on target. I find this more visually interesting/dynamic and less artificial/"procedural" looking (even if in reality your version where they all pop out more or less facing the same direction might be technically more accurate).
Great point!
the recreation for me is physically more accurate than the original. Aerodynamically speaking the fins on the rockets would help the rockets stay pointed in the direction of flight, that is why they are there. drop a bomb from a bomb rack on a b17 bomber and the bomb will still go in the direction the plane is flying. force is a vector. Adding a side ways force to an object in flight will only cause small deviation in the direction of travel, but small deviations can turn into a big mess if you are trying to be precise. that missile wasn't meant to be precise. it was meant to destroy a large area with as little effort as possible
Your GF looks so supportive at 1:22 xD
Looked great man! Great video! Just needed a buddy to hit you with a leaf blower from behind to simulate the impact haha
Thank you! Definitely would have helped, but I didn't feel like carrying a leaf blower to the top of a mountain haha
I refuse to accept that ironman came out 16 years ago.
I refuse to believe you uploaded first video 17 years ago
amazing work! gonna leave a like and subscribe. also for some reason at 4:56 when you drop the missile model and it shatters made me laugh out loud. I think my humor is broken lol.
As someone who did some Cinema 4D 20 years ago, I say great work 😄😄
This was so greatly done...Looking at the magnitude of the explosion, I think it would have been much better if the explosions were abit more farther.
Having already Houdini, Nuke, Davinci, the tesla, the drone, the camera and gear's camera is a plus, we're not gonna lie on this, with that said, yes, this shot cost only $20😂😂
Excellent work, it's juste mind blowing !!
Exactly my thoughts 😀. Not counting the car, it is tens of thousands worth of professional equipment and SW.
He could also get there riding a bike. So the car isn’t worth calculating.
IMPRESIONANTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I like your result more than what they did in the movie !!!
Dude this is crazy, crazy good. Your channel's quality is well deserving of WAY more subs. Keep it up!
Bros back had to be so strong to carry the entire mcu
Tony's shockwave was so light, it just felt like a push. Your's was so dense, it looked like you were caught in the explosion.
I like the way you make things look easy even though it is really difficult, thumbs up🔥
I understand the title being what it is to get the clicks. I just hope studio execs don't see this kind of thing and continue to undervalue VFX artists like yourselves work. It's amazing and important
Budget of $20 includes:
Drone
Camera
Tesla
High Performance PC
Dual Computer Screens
If you order VFX you also don't pay for their equipment.
Most slept on channel
He posted this on facebook, and almost all comments were hating on it 😭. This is really good for one person and only 20 dollar budget
you dont get it, it is not a 20 dollar budget xd
Keep working man! A lot of work on this video.. U are insane! :)
Sir you are really talented...can't imagine how amazing stuff you could do with the budget they had for VFX.....Keep it up...
One big difference is that tony's clothes react to the shockwave by billowing, your clothes don't. Also the missiles after popping out don't spread out far enough to fall over such a wide area, they look like more of a cluster bombardment of a smaller area
this video prooves why photorealistic vfx are being made by 500 people during the whole year and not by one noname noob who just wants to sell a course to more noobs.
This definitely looks like something you would see in a B movie, but even those have WAY higher budgets. Pretty incredible for $20!
The effort is definitely worth more than $20, but it looks like it would be in a movie like Sharknado.
People who can do this legit need to get together and form alternatives to Hollywood.
great result!
Your my inspiration and hope to reach your level one day
I appreciate the support 😊 I wish you the best of luck with your projects!
Budget: $20😉
Proceeds to use $1000+ DSLR, $1000 drone, $200 Houdini license, $20 Dust Explosion assets
Equipments can be rented or borrowed though.
What about his chair? And the coffee in his cup? Or the house he produces from... or his monitor!
You are all being ridiculous. By all means, compare $3,220 to $140,000,000 instead.
@@davidnelson7719 Then say it's $3,220. Don't make a kid in Africa believe they can do this with $20
He did not purchase them for this project. Pretty sure those things he already owned.
What about the girlfriend? that is priceless
BRO, WHEN YOU SHOWED THE VID BEFORE IT WASNT EVEN GOOD BUT AT LAST HOW DID IT TURNED TO BE SO REALISTIC?!?!? HACKER
16 anos atrás e os efeitos estão melhores, de fato. Mereceram o dinheiro que ganharam.
Your Clothes weren’t winded or moving from the blast 😂😂 but awesome job it’s so cool to see that all
Bro you’re literally a master
You’re too kind Sebastian 🙏
My dumb head somehow can’t process that, of course the $140 million is for the whole movie, not just that one shot.
The title as it is right now feels misleading. Great work for the project, but a better title would be "remaking VFX of iron man DIY" or something. You are using professional equipment which has nothing to do with budget production of 20 $. In 2024 just the loan of 1 hour of working might already exceeds 20 $.
Amazing! Tech has really come a long way! You're skills are also incredible
I have never seen something so amazing! I love the work you put in it! You got my sub, keep on going!!! Love your content
You spent more than $20 just in electricity driving around looking for the perfect place to take your shot. How much did that computer cost? How much did the suit you wore cost? How long did it take you? What is your time worth? I'm sure you also ate food during this process how much did all that cost? $20....pshhh 😂
u do it then and get back to us all
Impressive. But if you saying budget of 20$ for one week does it mean that your salary per week is less than 20$ 🤔🤔
its looks like bullst
Why does someone say, that it is better than the Iron Man scene?
For 20$ is good, but...
there are ZERO physical interactions.
You have just a good visual, because of software, but it looks fake and chip.
yep, it is good but not close to original. Still good showcase what you can do with Houdini and some asset bashing even at home these days.
@@r6201skthis guy probably a proffesional so any average guy wouldn’t be able to do it
after watching you explained and edited your video, I watched your compare of Ironman shot and your video and both shots gave me goosebump! it was almost great! Just little more details and more realistic. I would rate your shot 9/10 😁👍
Wow, this was epic. I do love watching these kinds of videos, purely for the entertainment. The recreation was brilliant. You should do the White House explosion from Independence Day
7:24 why do you stand like that? Looks like a NPC to me bruh
The title doesn't make sense
Many parts look better than the movie. And I love the movie! The smoke from the small rockets and the main explosion are astonishing. You're a genius
LOVE IT! One of the most self-aware and funny videogs! Great video.
You earned my sub, this was incredibly impressive, you are truly a master of your craft.
I love seeing random youtubers showing up huge studios! reminds me of the super man lip problem that some dude fixed with his home computer better than the studios did
Really amazing and insightful video Erik!!!
its amazin how far simulation and 3D rendering tools have come that you can do stuff like this yourself.
All this advice from people! I am impressed my man💪
This is gold brother, looks amazing 👏❤️
The way shockwave moves Tony's suit was the money shot imo. I really wanted to see how you could recreate it however that didn't happen :D
It was an excellent effort for the amount of resources and time spent on the project. Gotta say though that the original scene looks more realistic in multiple areas.
well made... i am speechless 😁
Amazing how good this looks. Hollywood is dreading what this man could do with $21
Its always amusing when someone does something and makes it look easy but you know it isn't actually easy. This is a perfect example of that. Oh yeah I just did this and this, I mean I don't know personally never tried it but anytime I try to do video or image editing I cry.
stop crying and absorb tutorials, punk
It looks awesome! I wish i could do all that VFX stuff. Not 20$ though.
1) You need a very good PC.
2) Software costs some money.
3) You need knowledge that takes a lot of time to master.
But the result is fantastic 👍
Dude, the number of people picking at the title, the fact you drove a Tesla, or the colours were not perfect. Ffs, people really love to hate. This was absolutely incredible. Great job 😎🫰👍
WoW! beautiful work
What a freaking talent. Best of luck, I think you’ll be going places.
This is incredible work. Amazing. What a time to be alive! Just one tiny thing...if you were paying yourself then it would be more than $20 for a week's work.
Well, that's how technical improvements work. Somebody has an idea, creates a very complicated method to make it happen, and later on a bunch of companies do their best to use this idea and make it "clickable" for everybody.
So comparing a multi million dollar movie to a 20 dollar software, over 15 years later, isn't right. It just shows, how complicated things can get overused and made simple in the handling.
That's what happens to everything, especially for everyday products like TV sets for instance.
Inventing the first mobile phone in the 80s was a hard task, going from there to the iPhones of today is just evolution combined with other benefits like shrinking structures over time.
edit: I read my words again, and I don't want to reduce the result of your work. The resulting video is awesome. So my respect, looks great.
Bro you made that looks so freaking awesome!. I will yes your does look more like a napalm type strike. While Tony's looks more like a concussion force. But over all 10/10 👍
Amazing how nearly identical the shot is to the original, amazing work !!!!!!!!
Beautiful work, and amazing video! Great work!
I am not the VFX engineer but few notes that could improve the effect:
- when small rockets are released from main rocket their release animation is to linear, I would add more eased in-out curve to add the animation dynamic,
- there is also lack of "kick" when small rockets' engines are lid
when your tesla stuck I immediately applied a chatgpt voice to it in my head hahahahah. „I am stuck. cant move. help help help” 😂😂😂
На самом деле момент из старка не сильно лучше этого. Браво автор это настоящий шедевр.🎉
Is it wierd i think your explosions are WAY more epic and cool looking than what was in the movie?
That final result looks sick man!
and we got exactly what he paid for. the effort of one person and $20 quality. great effort btw.