Why Charizard Can't be Dragon Type

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,9 тис.

  • @MandJTV
    @MandJTV  9 місяців тому +535

    Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today's video. Go to strms.net/hellofresh_mandjtv, use my code MANDJTVFREE, and receive one free breakfast item per box while subscription is active.

    • @Junho69
      @Junho69 9 місяців тому +1

      Thanks

    • @CharzzTheAnimated
      @CharzzTheAnimated 9 місяців тому +1

      HAHA, IT IS I, GRUNTY BOY

    • @Zer0AsWell
      @Zer0AsWell 9 місяців тому +2

      Hi Mikey!

    • @Mr_Mistake19
      @Mr_Mistake19 9 місяців тому +1

      Hi Mikey

    • @DaSnickerLicker
      @DaSnickerLicker 9 місяців тому +1

      Ah yes I hate it when someone waves and I wave back but they were saying *HELLO* to someone else, especially when it happens with my friend *FRESH*

  • @HaxTheCharizard
    @HaxTheCharizard 9 місяців тому +2946

    And this is why Lance the "Dragon Tamer" uses Pokemon that aren't dragon types. A pokemon can be a dragon without being a dragon type.

    • @ChaoticTeen16
      @ChaoticTeen16 9 місяців тому +139

      ​@TheTarekDude They're just reiterating what Lance himself said in Pokémon Masters.

    • @arunramani1724
      @arunramani1724 9 місяців тому +127

      For me Its Birdkeeper Lance 🤣😂

    • @francishong7948
      @francishong7948 9 місяців тому +68

      That's true, all of lance's pokemon are dragon like at thevery least (aerodactyl kind of a a stretch but dragon and dinosaurs share the same word in Japanese)

    • @andrewkatz6649
      @andrewkatz6649 9 місяців тому +46

      Yep! Gyarados and Charizard are both anatomically dragons but got two other types that fit them.

    • @MorrisPXG
      @MorrisPXG 9 місяців тому +9

      @@arunramani1724bro can’t even talk to Dialga and Giratina😂 which are dragon type

  • @kirailazuli2941
    @kirailazuli2941 9 місяців тому +756

    Since you mentioned Fezandipiti, I love poking fun at it for the fact that despite being CLEARLY a bird, it actually has the Ground type weakness due to him being part Poison type. This means you can literally kick mud at that bird and he'll go down.

    • @AlecRiding
      @AlecRiding 9 місяців тому +8

      Poor team sku

    • @SleepingTroubles
      @SleepingTroubles 9 місяців тому +54

      meanwhile Dodrio is immune to ground

    • @pemanilnoob
      @pemanilnoob 9 місяців тому +45

      I actually didn’t use ground moves on it first cause I thought “well it’s a bird of course it won’t work”
      Then I thought “oh it’s not flying type” and then “oh it doesn’t even have levitate?”

    • @kirailazuli2941
      @kirailazuli2941 9 місяців тому +19

      @@pemanilnoob No worries! I actually found out completely by accident when I sent out my Cetitan against it. I knew he was Poison type naturally, but I jokingly used a Ground move against him to see what would happen. Needless to say, I felt pretty evil that day! 😈

    • @kobsterpro
      @kobsterpro 9 місяців тому +17

      Also, Fezandipiti is in a very similar situation to a lot of the ones mentioned, Fairy is its true type but poison is just from the chain. Would most likely just be a fairy/flying type without it.

  • @ND86119
    @ND86119 9 місяців тому +67

    "Uh, we don't need to mention blood-bending, this is a kids show." Mikey probably

  • @KittAxoIsHere
    @KittAxoIsHere 9 місяців тому +1733

    “Haha, not all dragons are Dragon-type Pokémon!” - Lance
    My boy Lance backing Charizard up…I respect it

    • @erikkesler1739
      @erikkesler1739 9 місяців тому +72

      And gyarados as well.

    • @micahelsgames7024
      @micahelsgames7024 9 місяців тому +5

      @@erikkesler1739 That only applies for students of blueberry(or have been in the past) people traveling,living in, or vacationing in alola (once again if they have)

    • @erikkesler1739
      @erikkesler1739 9 місяців тому +42

      @@micahelsgames7024 No? Lance has a Gyarados in Red and Blue? as well as every team he has with three or more pokemon until Black and White. Meaning the not all Dragons are Dragon type quote directly applies to Gyarados as well?

    • @MirageUchiha
      @MirageUchiha 9 місяців тому +31

      _"Conversely, not all Dragon-type Pokémon are dragons."_
      - Idk, some guy... 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @alexs5814
      @alexs5814 9 місяців тому +17

      My Boi Lance is is a Flying type Trainer first and foremost...

  • @MrRage-lg1ts
    @MrRage-lg1ts 9 місяців тому +3905

    “Since mega evolution is gone.” BOY DO I HAVE SOME NEWS FOR YOU!

    • @Shadow10345
      @Shadow10345 9 місяців тому +307

      Watching this after the recent announcement really is Fate's Comedic Genius

    • @gretchenknotts9638
      @gretchenknotts9638 9 місяців тому +49

      I thought the same thing!

    • @bsg-jay7093
      @bsg-jay7093 9 місяців тому +65

      To be fair, it never left the spin offs

    • @jembozaba4864
      @jembozaba4864 9 місяців тому +59

      Here’s hoping they fix Charizard. I want the mega forms. Have the design, stats and ability of Y, with the typing and flame colour of X.
      Also put that 20 point attack increase that Y gets into speed, because no one is using that attack stat when the special stat is so high

    • @jaden5676
      @jaden5676 9 місяців тому +30

      THERE IS NO WAY TELL ME YOUR NOT LYING IS IT ACTUALLY RETURNING

  • @DanielMWJ
    @DanielMWJ 8 місяців тому +62

    Dodrio: "Not even going to mention me? Even though I can Fly without visible wings? Alright, fine."

    • @beyondawesomegaming3517
      @beyondawesomegaming3517 2 місяці тому +1

      Golerk: “at least you’re flying type. I canonically fly using rockets in my boots in multiple gen 5 movies and can learn the move fly but I don’t even get access to levitate.”

    • @beyondawesomegaming3517
      @beyondawesomegaming3517 2 місяці тому

      Also doduo and Dodrio in cannon Pokédex eateries in the anime have stated they could always fly but they prefer to run because they’re faster running than flying.

  • @justinn8541akaDrPokemon
    @justinn8541akaDrPokemon 9 місяців тому +1147

    Can't wait for the Lugia Paradox. Where water type makes sense, that's what the original designer's intent, but the developers deseded to make is psychic type "to make it seem powerful" despite the nerfs psychic type got in gen 2.

    • @CharzzTheAnimated
      @CharzzTheAnimated 9 місяців тому +40

      And the Florgess paradox

    • @justinn8541akaDrPokemon
      @justinn8541akaDrPokemon 9 місяців тому +70

      @@CharzzTheAnimated At least florgess has a type that makes sense(even though it makes complete sense for it to have the grass type too).

    • @Pastel_Diamond_Studios
      @Pastel_Diamond_Studios 9 місяців тому +51

      Honestly, I could see Lugia being either Water/Flying or Water/Dragon.
      Water/Flying makes more scenes but Water/Dragon could help with making Lugia seem more powerful.

    • @justinn8541akaDrPokemon
      @justinn8541akaDrPokemon 9 місяців тому +37

      Or the Gyrados Paradox. Where the flying type makes no sense, had the opportunity like magemite and mageton to change type in gen 2, but only got that change during mega evolution.

    • @IDK-y1n
      @IDK-y1n 9 місяців тому +5

      and the palkia paradox

  • @snehilhamal1322
    @snehilhamal1322 9 місяців тому +186

    "It technically fit the definition of paradox but it sound really cool" is the best line for me in the video

  • @ZettaPrime
    @ZettaPrime 8 місяців тому +9

    If it looks like one, sounds like one and acts like one, it’s a dragon.

    • @herowither12354
      @herowither12354 7 днів тому +2

      I can't wait for the dragon equivalent to Sudowudo and Fomantis!

  • @obits3
    @obits3 9 місяців тому +340

    To make things more complicated, the latest DLC challenges the player to “Take a picture of a Pokémon in flight.” Nearly anything levitating, including Geodude, counts.

  • @zyxey
    @zyxey 9 місяців тому +808

    0:40 "But since mega evolution is gone..."
    Poorly aged in the best way.

    • @rawtrout007
      @rawtrout007 9 місяців тому +15

      What happened? Did they bring it back???

    • @Mago-Soul-Gaming
      @Mago-Soul-Gaming 9 місяців тому +13

      Yes it is back

    • @wanderingmercurymarauder761
      @wanderingmercurymarauder761 9 місяців тому +21

      @@Mago-Soul-Gaming But not in the main games. It never stopped being a thing in the spin off games.

    • @numsei-9291
      @numsei-9291 9 місяців тому +18

      @@rawtrout007 Let's just say that... Pokémon Z-A is the GOAT

    • @TaniahTudor
      @TaniahTudor 9 місяців тому +3

      Ikr

  • @definitivamenteno-malo7919
    @definitivamenteno-malo7919 9 місяців тому +3

    Evolution (not ingame that is basically metamorphosis, but actual evolution), could be the answer: Charizard is a recently evolved reptile that hasn't adapted enough to have a different type than Fire, and can't get rid of Flying type to have its wings functional.
    The other option, is thst maybe it was Fire-Dragon like Turtonator, but given the evolutionary circumstances, the growing of wings and the capacity of air control that gives Flying type, was better suited for their recently developed wings.
    And still haven't even started video haha

  • @marsphoenix1359
    @marsphoenix1359 9 місяців тому +227

    I like the idea that Charizard is just so over joyed by the power of flight that it practically never lands and just flies *everywhere* hence it having the flying type, not dragon.

    • @vaughnalexander32
      @vaughnalexander32 8 місяців тому +17

      I think that is more like the Bagon line..

    • @marsphoenix1359
      @marsphoenix1359 8 місяців тому +19

      @@vaughnalexander32 Wing buddies

  • @SantaClawsYT
    @SantaClawsYT 9 місяців тому +335

    I remember telling my dad(who isn't into Pokemon but his favourite was Charizard) that I made a charizard in real life when I was eight. I'd put a neon light on the tail of a toy lizard.

    • @feeferkeefer
      @feeferkeefer 9 місяців тому +13

      Aww so wholesome.

    • @HackerDragon9999
      @HackerDragon9999 9 місяців тому +6

      But that's Charmander

    • @johnkiggs108
      @johnkiggs108 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@HackerDragon9999nah, charmander is a salamander.. that's weak against water

    • @SantaClawsYT
      @SantaClawsYT 9 місяців тому +4

      @@HackerDragon9999 I put no wings to annoy my dad because they were his favorite part of the design

    • @alvarocorreacesarsantos
      @alvarocorreacesarsantos 2 місяці тому

      *Dude, that's amazing.*

  • @kingillager
    @kingillager 8 місяців тому +6

    “Empoleon with fly would make sense” lmao

  • @lavieestbellexx
    @lavieestbellexx 9 місяців тому +131

    Man, the sponsor segments are always so seamless that I almost forget it's Mikey recording alone twice then putting it together. It feels like an organic conversation flowing. Awesome work dude!

    • @blixerthememer5465
      @blixerthememer5465 9 місяців тому +8

      What do you mean they’re two completely different people /j

    • @TheBeastlySort02
      @TheBeastlySort02 9 місяців тому +7

      But they're two separate people????

    • @semihozen238
      @semihozen238 9 місяців тому +6

      Dw guys he knows Mikey and Grunty are different. It’s just he’s talking about how the camera angle changes on times it shouldn’t, so he thought they are having the same argument twice so that Mikey can record Grunty’s lines as well.
      That’s what you meant, riiiiight?

    • @IAmMissingnoMaster
      @IAmMissingnoMaster 9 місяців тому +3

      It's clearly two completely different people, what are you talking about?
      (no but really, I 1,000% agree, Mikey is super skilled. This is legit the only channel I watch where I actively look forward to the sponsored segments)

    • @CRios25
      @CRios25 9 місяців тому

      @@IAmMissingnoMasterwhat about Daniel Thrasher

  • @shachargold6896
    @shachargold6896 9 місяців тому +636

    Mickey- "Mammals are warm blooded and have live births"
    Platypus: *heavy breathing sounds*

    • @Popanimates
      @Popanimates 9 місяців тому +73

      DOO BEE DOO BE DO BAH

    • @Choco_paz
      @Choco_paz 9 місяців тому +69

      "there are more intricacies to this, but you get the picture"

    • @eeveequeenhanna
      @eeveequeenhanna 9 місяців тому +42

      Don’t forget echidnas.

    • @legion4022
      @legion4022 9 місяців тому +47

      A Platypus?
      Put's on Agent head
      Perry the platypus!

    • @RajaniIsa
      @RajaniIsa 9 місяців тому +6

      But they also nurse.

  • @skulleagle417
    @skulleagle417 9 місяців тому +4

    The whole steel not creating anything but there is the physical move magnet bomb

  • @WhiteRaven696
    @WhiteRaven696 9 місяців тому +421

    To be fair, Charizard is part of the Dragon Egg Group. Doesn’t matter if it’s not Dragon type, it’s still a Dragon. (And so are Arbok, Gyarados, Sceptile, Seviper, Milotic, Scrafty, Heliolisk, Salazzle and Sandaconda)

    • @Lupinemancer87
      @Lupinemancer87 9 місяців тому +45

      I think that has to do with the fact that the concept of a Dragon in Japan is different then what we use in the West. For example, Ryū is Japanese for "dragon" and can be found in the Japanese term for "dinosaur", kyōryū. Meaning a Dragon in Japan is basically just a giant reptile, hence why most Dragon-type Pokemon are just that, giant reptiles. Could explain why so many reptile Pokemon are in the Dragon Egg Category despite not being dragons.
      The reason why Charizard isn't a Dragon-type despite being clearly Dragon-like is because it's main charactaristic, is that it's a flying fire creature, hence the Fire/Flying types. It's the same reason why Serperior is also not a Dragon-type despite being reptile in appearence. It's basically just a living vine that looks like a snake.

    • @majesticgothitelle1802
      @majesticgothitelle1802 9 місяців тому +3

      Dragons is a shoe in for the reptile type and magic too.

    • @kbeatzgonecrazy
      @kbeatzgonecrazy 9 місяців тому +10

      @@Lupinemancer87 It seems like Pokemon has a way different perspective towards 'Flying' and 'Dragon' types that we cannot find out yet.
      According to my point of view, 'Dragon' types are either dragon-like (Rayquaza), Gigantic (Alolan Exeggutor), Reptilian (Tyrantrum) or Mythic-looking (Flapple) creatures. While 'Flying' type is probably about 'controlling the air' rather than 'being a bird' or 'having wings' since it can be applied to Dodrio, Minior, etc.

    • @TheTakato122
      @TheTakato122 9 місяців тому +8

      @@kbeatzgonecrazy Alolan Exeggutor is solely the result of a pun.

    • @Guster___
      @Guster___ 9 місяців тому +4

      ​@@TheTakato122 Yeah, the only thing connecting it to the type is its origin of a shapeshifting dragon

  • @sylvy16
    @sylvy16 9 місяців тому +170

    9:00 as someone who knows about celtic mythology, hearing that “fae-adjacent creatures are kind hearted” is just so funny to me.

    • @JackBond1234
      @JackBond1234 9 місяців тому +45

      Even not knowing anything about celtic mythology, fairy type pokemon never seem presented as "kind hearted". More like mischievous and unsettling despite a saccharine demeanor.

    • @theantagonist801
      @theantagonist801 8 місяців тому +15

      @@JackBond1234 _Points to Hatenna_ Or just straight up violent.

    • @DakuGamer98
      @DakuGamer98 8 місяців тому +6

      @@theantagonist801 ever heard about tinkaton?

    • @theantagonist801
      @theantagonist801 8 місяців тому +11

      @@DakuGamer98 Honestly, I think Tinkaton is the only PokéDex entry that states "yes, it purposefully attacks this Pokémon out of spite and anger at the world." (Paraphrased, of course.)

  • @FriskTemmieGoogle
    @FriskTemmieGoogle 8 місяців тому +3

    I have never seen you before this video and I'm not really a pokemon fan
    but I gotta say: great video. It was really well structured, the pace was not too fast, but not too slow and you went from point A to B with the required stops so people that don't understand a lot about pokemon could enjoy the video. Thanks, really.

  • @justinjyeung
    @justinjyeung 9 місяців тому +392

    I like how it feels like this video came about because Mikey was doing research on which Pokemon should be allowed in Team Sky but aren't Flying-type, and then eventually dug deeper to find the root of the discrepancy (categorization of types based on element or anatomy) XD

  • @michaelserwetnyk1607
    @michaelserwetnyk1607 9 місяців тому +179

    14:26
    You could also argue for ghost as an additional acceptable typing for parasect, given that the mushroom is in full control. It basically means that the “bug” portion is more akin to like a zombie.

    • @gabriellockwood2780
      @gabriellockwood2780 9 місяців тому +18

      Paras - Bug/Grass
      Parasect - Ghost/Grass
      Eh?

    • @slavibg2525
      @slavibg2525 9 місяців тому +13

      ​​​@@gabriellockwood2780ghost grass parasect would be cool tbh and it'd make more sense

    • @thenerdbeast7375
      @thenerdbeast7375 9 місяців тому +6

      Or a dark type due to the sinister nature of the mushroom.

    • @dekumidoriya2928
      @dekumidoriya2928 9 місяців тому

      Did we actually have a zombie pokemon before ? Couldn't remember

    • @nicholaslienandjaja1815
      @nicholaslienandjaja1815 8 днів тому

      And not all Ghost Pokemon are spirits of the dead. Some are actually nature spirits/elementals.

  • @robertw.hewitt7465
    @robertw.hewitt7465 8 місяців тому +1

    I think Slither Wing, Flutter Mane, or Iron Moth could also be flying. Slither Wing has wing in its name, Flutter Mane can flutter, and Iron Moth has weird robo-wings

  • @JerginBootwyler
    @JerginBootwyler 9 місяців тому +455

    Mikey: "Mega evolution is gone"
    Pokemon Legends Z-A: "are you sure about that?"

    • @hananaltair3563
      @hananaltair3563 9 місяців тому +9

      Lol😂

    • @wlkrcodm4490
      @wlkrcodm4490 3 місяці тому

      Wdym???

    • @noahdavila8204
      @noahdavila8204 3 місяці тому

      @@wlkrcodm4490Mega evolution is coming back in the new pokemon game, shown by the mega evolution symbol at the end of the trailer

    • @endimo5019
      @endimo5019 3 місяці тому

      @@wlkrcodm4490 the new pokemon game, mega evolution is coming back

  • @farhanbinrabbani4627
    @farhanbinrabbani4627 9 місяців тому +432

    "We have known since the 90's that it's under the Celadon Game Corner"
    Man it goes hard xD

    • @woopman729
      @woopman729 9 місяців тому +10

      they literally let a 10yr old beat everyone there including their boss

    • @Planetmango48
      @Planetmango48 9 місяців тому +5

      Yeah.

    • @UnkownWonders
      @UnkownWonders 9 місяців тому +6

      ​@@woopman729 that's the reason why they didn't return in the second generation in the games. They just couldn't recover from this massive loss

    • @aslidisbudak2108
      @aslidisbudak2108 9 місяців тому

      I was so confused when it was announced to be male

  • @BrandonTheOne2
    @BrandonTheOne2 8 місяців тому +1

    I love mikeys progression from being enemys with grunty boi to sometimes being freinds and sometimes being enemies to being friends to geeking out about sponsors

  • @gamexpert1990
    @gamexpert1990 9 місяців тому +32

    12:11
    True, it's extremely specific and not likely to happen very often, but there's already been coding in the games for *exactly* such a trio-type combo since Gen 6.
    Use Gourgeist's signature move, Trick-Or-Treat, on a Heracross or such, and voila! You now have temporary access to a Bug/Fighting/Ghost Pokémon.
    (Although this particular setup is not availavle in Gen 9, similar trio-types can be made by adding the Grass type instead, using Trevenant's signature move, Forest's Curse, which actually is still in Gen 9.)

  • @lawrence9806
    @lawrence9806 9 місяців тому +190

    "But since mega evolutions are gone..."
    Well, that aged rather well. Maybe even as well as the milk I left sitting in the basement for four years, lol.

    • @ethans9379
      @ethans9379 9 місяців тому +11

      Enjoy your cheese

    • @J0RD4N_D3V1L
      @J0RD4N_D3V1L 5 місяців тому +1

      was it miltank's milk?

  • @kittentamer2164
    @kittentamer2164 8 місяців тому +1

    Types are related to Typed Energy. This is canon. It's a soft magic system, and not literally what they are. Fire Type moves are not quite literal fire. It's Typed energy with Fire-Like properties. Same reason how Ponyta can burn something they want, yet magically choose not to burn something.
    So types are really just what energy a Pokemon has flowing through them. Being capable of Flight does not make you a Flying Type. Having a lot of Flying Type Energy, as Typed energy, within you makes you Flying Type. You can also lose access to a type, or have your type change completely.

  • @starbuckr5381
    @starbuckr5381 9 місяців тому +66

    "birds are warm blooded and lay eggs" *stares in platypus and echidna*

  • @Xeldum119
    @Xeldum119 9 місяців тому +59

    1:59
    I could 100% see blastoise as a rock type

    • @LetsTalkSports001
      @LetsTalkSports001 9 місяців тому +27

      I personally would have made it water/steel because of Blastoise's cannons.

    • @Xeldum119
      @Xeldum119 9 місяців тому

      That’s also cool.

    • @matthewkuscienko4616
      @matthewkuscienko4616 9 місяців тому +6

      ​@LetsTalkSports001 It's also worth noting that Blastoise can learn flash cannon by level up (I think it needs the move reminder for that one)

    • @theantagonist801
      @theantagonist801 8 місяців тому +3

      Grass/Poison, Fire/Dragon, Water/Rock

    • @DS-tv2fi
      @DS-tv2fi 8 місяців тому +1

      Yeah, like a regional form that’s based on land based turtles/tortoises or something.

  • @SwagnerCountsThings
    @SwagnerCountsThings 9 місяців тому +1

    I'm a firm believer that there used to be more "anatomical" types in the early game design. Most notably beast, fish, and bird. Which is why we have so many normal/flying types. They were all supposed to be normal/birds to contrast the legendary elemental ones and make them seem even more powerful.
    Tinfoil hat still on, this is why rock and ground were two separate types, because rock was the anatomical type and ground was the element type. In this tinfoil hat Charizard, Gyarados, Aerodactyl were all supposed to have dragon as the second type(flying had yet to be established) and Dragonite was a pure flying type.
    Then at some point, maybe they were trying to curtail how powerful Charizard, Gyarados, and Aerodactyl were since they were all easily obtained early on, or maybe they were trying to save space, or maybe simplify the already complex type chart, they created flying type, gave it to all the dragons (dropping the dragon type from the 3 that were already dual type) changed the birds to flying, and stuck it on every other monotype that had wings i.e. Butterfree, Zubat, Golbat, scyther. Since all the fish types were water they just dropped that type completely (tough cookies Chi-Yu) and beast type probably didn't have any remaining meaningful interaction so it was canned.
    Again though that is with a tinfoil hat, so take those thoughts with a grain of salt

    • @jaschabull2365
      @jaschabull2365 7 місяців тому

      From what I recall hearing, dragon type was apparently tacked on to dragonite to make Lance's team a tougher challenge at the end of the game. Maybe that's why nothing else in gen 1 gets it.

  • @dragonmasterjoe724
    @dragonmasterjoe724 9 місяців тому +30

    “They can’t move water with their mind”
    Short horned lizard: allow me to introduce my blood bending

  • @Redwolf2495
    @Redwolf2495 9 місяців тому +16

    And there's also Golurk, who is constantly shown being capable of flight in the anime via jet boosters and in the games it can learn Fly via TM.

  • @catkook543
    @catkook543 8 місяців тому +4

    3:46
    Actuallllllllllllllly
    That's how animals used to be categorized
    and by used to, I mean before your grandparents were born
    modern species are categorized based off of species family trees.
    All the felines had a common ancestor
    all the canines had a common ancestor
    dolphins and whales are categorized as mammals even though they swim under water and cant go on land
    platypuses lay eggs even though they're a mammal

  • @carrotpatch5828
    @carrotpatch5828 9 місяців тому +40

    The scrapped BIRD type in Gen 1 is starting to make a lot more sense…😂

    • @theprinceofawesomeness
      @theprinceofawesomeness 7 місяців тому +1

      It was scraped because Normal/Flying was perfect to describe a bird

    • @nicholaslienandjaja1815
      @nicholaslienandjaja1815 8 днів тому

      Not all Flying types are birds (or have wings), just like not all Dragon types are dragons and not all Ghost types are spirits of the dead.

  • @chimeragenesis361
    @chimeragenesis361 9 місяців тому +20

    16:10 these three have the added issue that storywise, they're spirits of previously deepsea creatures, so Water could also make sense for them.

  • @RaptorBrain
    @RaptorBrain 6 місяців тому +1

    I genuinely love this video. It feels so similar to your older videos but with the flair you’ve developed as your channel has grown. Your channel has inspired me to start thinking about making my own videos about Pokémon (and other stuff) but this video pushed me enough to actually start.

  • @ProTRK-we1ke
    @ProTRK-we1ke 9 місяців тому +29

    2:55 technically it fits the definition of a type 5 paradox which is defined as “someone on the internet getting something wrong and being confused about it”. I know that our glorious leader Mickey would never be confused about something like this but others have so it counts

    • @williamjones5334
      @williamjones5334 9 місяців тому +3

      I was thinking it also arises from a type 2 paradox (unanswerable question) - the designers have to answer the question "what fits this Pokemon better: flying or dragon?", but there is no answer, because it's a flying dragon.
      But yeah, the fact that Charizard doesn't have dragon type is probably type 5, because there is an answer you can point to, that some people just don't realise.

    • @gabriellockwood2780
      @gabriellockwood2780 9 місяців тому

      @@williamjones5334
      Charizard is a salamander.
      So realistically, it should be Ground-Type, since salamanders live on the ground.

  • @THEW0LFB0Y
    @THEW0LFB0Y 9 місяців тому +127

    "Not all Dragons are Dragon-Type." -Lance

    • @cesarhernandez6861
      @cesarhernandez6861 9 місяців тому +2

      Facts.

    • @remhauck1577
      @remhauck1577 9 місяців тому +9

      Lance just can't accept that he's actually a bird keeper.

    • @ThePkmnYPerson
      @ThePkmnYPerson 9 місяців тому +3

      That just raises the question of what a dragon is in the Pokémon world. It's like if he had said that not all cats are Normal type. He shouldn't know that word.

    • @SkareKrow23
      @SkareKrow23 3 місяці тому +1

      Charizard and Gyarados are the only pokemon (in Lance's party) covered by his statement. The best Aerodactyl can hope for is to be called a wyvern!

    • @UncleLincoln
      @UncleLincoln Місяць тому

      @@remhauck1577hahaha

  • @EternalKhann
    @EternalKhann 3 місяці тому +12

    I don't care. Make Blastoise water/dragon, Venusaur leaf/dragon, but give Charizard the goddamn Dragon type it deserved.

    • @Agent-Happy
      @Agent-Happy 3 місяці тому

      New regional variants; visual true versions

    • @tomasturbando9836
      @tomasturbando9836 3 місяці тому

      Blastoise water/fairy and maintain poison/grass venusaur

    • @aidenharper6013
      @aidenharper6013 3 місяці тому

      Or just give Blastoise the rock or ground type. I dont understand why he said they dont make sense, thats literally the secondary typing for half the turtles.

    • @uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweug3450
      @uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweug3450 3 місяці тому

      ​@aidenharper6013 right. Some tortoises live underground so it makes sense

    • @soosizei3973
      @soosizei3973 2 дні тому

      @@tomasturbando9836 Hold on. You cookin with this one.

  • @pokemaster21
    @pokemaster21 9 місяців тому +34

    This reminds me of your early days, the Pokemon Talk, and What happens in a Pokeball days. You've come full circle, and I have nothing but respect for you, as my favorite Poketuber. Heres to years to come, and Go Team Sky! Thanks Mikey, for making my childhood so good so far.
    Edit: Your classification based on avatar and manipulations makes a lot of sense. I've heard less specific theories and was confued on how you would manipulate a bug. Now thinking again, i think he talked extra long about flying types for a reason....*cough cough*....team sky.....

  • @TheAwesomeTruthofTT
    @TheAwesomeTruthofTT 9 місяців тому +11

    Basically, it’s that old 3 pick 2 situation… no matter how hard you try you are gonna miss out. My grandpa used to work as a contractor and he would tell this to his clients.
    You can have your project done cheep fast or quality but you can only pick two
    Cheep and Fast = Poor Quality
    Cheep and Quality= Slow
    Fast and Quality = Expensive.
    But you can never have all 3…

    • @shadenox8164
      @shadenox8164 8 місяців тому

      Except in this case dragon was never considered, it's clearly supposed to be a winged lizard.

    • @CircleWedge
      @CircleWedge 6 місяців тому

      Cheap*
      Cheep is a bird sound, like peep.

  • @daim.02
    @daim.02 4 місяці тому +2

    Ground would work amazing for blastoise… he’s a tortoise/turtle, animals that leave in the water AND ON LAND
    Besides that would fit perfectly with the rest of the starters. Venusaurs poison wouldn’t work anymore since ground is immune to it, but grass would hit X4. If charizard stayed fire flying, water>fire and Flying>Ground

  • @eesev2017
    @eesev2017 9 місяців тому +18

    Saying this in a separate comment because it was the point of the other one, but Dark does not have a “darkness” aspect, it’s just the “Evil” type. All of the moves are (purely) related to mischief or sinister intentions, even Dark Pulse.

    • @kxndela
      @kxndela 6 місяців тому

      haha get it? pure-ly? haha! your mom must be the infidelity type!

  • @SondaroSasuke
    @SondaroSasuke 9 місяців тому +15

    11:28 you gotta love how in this situation Gyarados makes absolutely no sense other than "it flies because Chineese mythos". It can't fly canonically (not counting the flying Gyarados in Legends:Arceus), it can't learn Fly, it can't manipulate wind other than specifically learning Hurricane (and I still can't wrap around my head over how that works) and it's DEFINITELY not a bird.
    You call this the Charizard Paradox, but I'm gonna go with the Gyarados Dilemma 😂

    • @RenewedRS
      @RenewedRS 16 днів тому

      Gyarados can fly canonically and why would you dismiss a demonstration of it flying in a game lmao

  • @halyoalex8942
    @halyoalex8942 8 місяців тому +2

    I would love to see some sort of follow-up video to this/"what if pokemon had Earth-type" where you split and combine pokemon types to make a "more" "logical" type chart.

  • @IDKovers
    @IDKovers 9 місяців тому +16

    Petition to have all pokemon listed at 15:48 to be allowed in Team Sky

  • @Huhneee
    @Huhneee 9 місяців тому +60

    0:43 "Since mega evolution is gone" pokemon presents: ackshually...

  • @ChemicalXII
    @ChemicalXII 3 місяці тому +2

    "Fine, I'll do it myself: Charizard is and has always been a fire, dragon, flying type. - Godzilla & The Dragon Association (chairman: Toothless).".

  • @gamingmudkip5030
    @gamingmudkip5030 9 місяців тому +7

    some more I found
    Celebi
    Scizor
    Heracross
    Garchomp
    Lunala
    Buzzwole
    Quaxly(Should be like the rowlet line where the final evo loses the flying type)
    Sirfetch'd(Has wings sure it's holding a lot)
    Pecharunt(Can't tell if those are wings)
    Dunsparce/ Dudunsparce ( Don't know if those wings are big enough)
    Sheninja (Can't tell if those wings could move)
    Druddigon (Can't tell if wings move)
    Tapu koko (Based off a bird and has small wings, would put other tapus but they aren't based off of birds

  • @ThePkmnYPerson
    @ThePkmnYPerson 9 місяців тому +9

    Every flight Pokémon that's not a Flying Type be like - "Arceus! I don't need to be identified by something I happen to do! You don't see me saying you should be called a Video Making Type Human."

  • @Xavazorn
    @Xavazorn 7 місяців тому +1

    man, the second he started ranting about the last airbender, i thought everything had finally caught up to him XD

  • @JCThe14th
    @JCThe14th 9 місяців тому +12

    4:44 god I love Grunty Boi

  • @JoniZhask
    @JoniZhask 8 місяців тому +1

    "Ghost are physically ghost", mikey just created another paradox on its own 🤣🤣

    • @dansattah
      @dansattah 8 місяців тому

      Tradititionally? Yes.
      In Pokemon Type history? NO! Originally, most Ghost Type moves were status moves, but it had one more Physical attack than Special ones, so Ghost stayed a Physical type until Gen 4.

  • @inderdeepsingh5498
    @inderdeepsingh5498 9 місяців тому +8

    I don't watch your videos super often (just don't have much time to watch youtube anymore) but I used to watch all the time when I was younger. This style of video is definitely super interesting and I really liked this video! I agree with people saying it feels kinda like a Pokemon Professor explaining things, and its really good!

  • @Mrdipbhai
    @Mrdipbhai 2 місяці тому +1

    2:05 ground or Rock definitely make sense with blastoise, just give blastoise rock or ground type and give my boy Charizard a Dragon type !!!

  • @mjvdg4194
    @mjvdg4194 9 місяців тому +20

    This is somewhat tangential, but my worry with the fairy type was that it’d be fully related to physiognomy. I’m so glad that it expanded (Grimsnarl and Mimikyu being examples) since I’ve always loved all fae legends to death and am so glad they have reasonably thoughtful inclusion!

  • @alaricsavage7223
    @alaricsavage7223 9 місяців тому +23

    "Now that mega evolution is gone"
    That really didn't age well 😭

  • @BushWookie666
    @BushWookie666 7 місяців тому +1

    Pokémon's next gimmick: Pokémon have 3 types now

  • @ShiMusume
    @ShiMusume 9 місяців тому +6

    I imagine the best reason Pokemon could give in lore due to types is:
    A pokemon's assigned type is given based on what seems effective and not effective against the pokemon.
    This would imply researchers could have spent a lot of time just having pokemon hit others with various attacks and writing down the results. However... that would be a little grim for the pokemon universe even if that is what we often do in games to learn (without looking up some type chart)

  • @joeydk
    @joeydk 9 місяців тому +6

    You could see it as the pokemon types not representing what powers a pokemon CAN use, but more what powers a pokemon PREFERS to use. Regular charizard could be mostly relying on its fire power combined with aerial combat styles, while mega charizard X taps into the inherent draconic powers that charizard possesses. It would also explain why a pokemon can learn moves from types it doesn't have, while getting STAB for moves of the same type as it is more experienced in using these types of moves.

    • @PinkaholicOfficial
      @PinkaholicOfficial 2 місяці тому +3

      Gyarados whose only flying STAB is mf Bounce:

    • @GrugGangGrugGang
      @GrugGangGrugGang Місяць тому

      @@PinkaholicOfficial Gyarados loves trampolines more than anything, obviously.

  • @awesomemccoolname7111
    @awesomemccoolname7111 3 місяці тому +1

    This video should be about 5 seconds long and meerly say, "He can and he should be a dragon."

  • @krisrainbow2350
    @krisrainbow2350 9 місяців тому +20

    I have always loved Charizard. Its the first pokemon I ever got to Level 100 without a gameshark. I felt so accomplished.

  • @dhayes5143
    @dhayes5143 9 місяців тому +6

    About half way through this vid, delving into the problem of Flying type, and I have to say this a great analysis. Clear, robust, and not just doing whatever you feel like with an arbitrary classification but really trying to drill down into what this all really means. Great stuff.

  • @michaelkelleypoetry
    @michaelkelleypoetry 2 місяці тому +2

    I was born in 1989, so I remember when Pokemon first started and the frustration us initial pokemon fans had with Red, Blue, and Yellow when we found out our Charizard that had wings couldn't learn Fly because it was just Fire type. So, the blame may be partly due to our complaints. We got Charizard's secondary Flying type added before there was a Dragon type.

    • @Bothrops_Asper_89
      @Bothrops_Asper_89 2 місяці тому

      Charizard being capable of learning Fly was corrected in Yellow, though.

    • @oepalu
      @oepalu 2 місяці тому

      That doesn't make any sense. Charizard was already a Flying type in Red and Blue even though it couldn't learn Fly so nobody got the Flying type added to Charizard, it always had it. Nevermind doing so before Dragon type existed as as Dragon type also existed in Red and Blue, "before there was a Dragon type" is just before Pokemon existed.

    • @michaelkelleypoetry
      @michaelkelleypoetry 2 місяці тому

      @@oepalu No, in Red and Blue Charizard was just a single Fire type. It didn't have any secondary typing.

    • @oepalu
      @oepalu 2 місяці тому

      @@michaelkelleypoetry You are definitely wrong. I am replaying Pokemon Blue at the moment and after just checking Charizard is absolutely Fire/Flying. From googling it seems some people misremember dual types not existing in Gen 1 and there are even rumors of somebody selling a version of those games where dual types aren't included but if that is the case it's only a mistake somebody made when trying to copy/fake Red and Blue. In short if you have a copy of Red or Blue where Charizard is a pure Fire type it is almost certainly a fake.

  • @ianvandijk840
    @ianvandijk840 9 місяців тому +7

    Mikey, it's a good video with clear explanations, but I think the reason why Charizard is a fire/flying type is much simpler. If Charizard had become a dragon type in Gen 1, it would mean that it would be mega overpowered. In Gen 1, dragon types had only two weaknesses, ice and other dragon types. Since the Dratini line are the only dragon types in Gen 1, you would need a Dragonite to stand a chance against Charizard. However, if Charizard were also a dragon type, it would mean it could also take out that Dragonite before you do that with Charizard. Then you have the ice types, the problem with them is the fact that they are weak against fire types. With this, they would also have little chance against Charizard, the only Pokémon that might have a chance could be Dewgong but for the rest very few. The reason Charizard is a fire/flying type is simply to maintain balance in the games. With Charizard as a fire/flying type, you have access to multiple Pokémon that can take on Charizard. That's I think the main reason Charizard didn't become a fire/dragon type.
    PS, you forgot Garchomp as a Pokémon with wings but without the levitate ability.

    • @charizardpropaganda
      @charizardpropaganda 9 місяців тому +2

      In gen 1, fire/dragon Charizard would be weak to ice type because fire didn't resist ice back then. And Blastoise can learn ice type moves so it wouldn't be an issue in gen 1. It's a different story in gen 1 remakes though.

    • @rokkraljkolesa9317
      @rokkraljkolesa9317 8 місяців тому

      Garchomp is an especially weird one, because while they are used as wings, it makes more sense for them to simply be find, as the Gible line are sand _sharks_

    • @jeffreygao3956
      @jeffreygao3956 8 місяців тому +1

      And that’s why Fire should resist Ice!

  • @thenoobygamer9000
    @thenoobygamer9000 9 місяців тому +9

    11:36 There was actually going to be a typing for birds, specifically in Gen 1, but was ultimately changed and put with the flying type since there wasn't that many bird pokemon then. However, if you take that into consideration for his analysis on the flying type, it makes it make a lot more sense. You can see what they just threw in with the flying type at this point as well.

    • @MDoorpsy
      @MDoorpsy 9 місяців тому

      This is very odd reasoning, since at the time there was also only 1 ghost line (Gengar) and 1 dragon line (Dragonite), yet many more bird Pokemon, even some that it wouldn't make sense to be flying, like Dodrio, leading to the meme of it flying by flapping its heads. In fact, there are more 'bird' Pokemon lines in gen 1 (7 total) than there are bug lines (6, though Kabutops and Omastar could arguably count if they weren't fossils).

    • @thenoobygamer9000
      @thenoobygamer9000 9 місяців тому

      @@MDoorpsy I honestly agree with that, but space was also limited for those games, and it uses as much as it can while cutting anything unessesary. So, making a category for birds and flying pokemon could be seen as unessary and take up data that can be used for other things(especially with type advantages and potential extra moves because of it being an official part of it). They should have brought back the idea in the games they made afterward since the device could handle the extra data, and there were even more bird like pokemon added. That is an amazing meme with Doduo though 🤣

    • @MDoorpsy
      @MDoorpsy 9 місяців тому

      @@thenoobygamer9000 The more likely reason is just that they realized some of their cool dragon designs would be too broken if they were dragon type, and so created the flying type specifically so they could give it to Charizard and Gyarodos instead of dragon.

    • @thenoobygamer9000
      @thenoobygamer9000 9 місяців тому

      @MDoorpsy saying that they made the flying type specifically for Gyarodos and Charizard is a lot less likely since that game actually needed a few more dragon types. I would think they gave Charizard flying instead of dragon since it is a starter pokemon, and none have been dragon type(unless they introduced it in scarlet/violet). Especially when there is a lot of "flying" pokemon and "bird" pokemon that are the same, so they would be a "flying bird" pokemon, which is redundant if you have flying, which is more versatile as well(until they introduced levitate and severly underutilized the flying aspect that it can give).

    • @MDoorpsy
      @MDoorpsy 9 місяців тому

      @@thenoobygamer9000 Dragon was originally intended to be the strongest type in the game, so Charizard as a starter would have been broken if it had it. Gyarados couldn't be dragon because they didn't want the player to have a dragon type with good stats at level 20, and grinding a Magikarp to level 50 like Dragonite would have been too much to ask of players.

  • @gregorymirabella1423
    @gregorymirabella1423 8 місяців тому +1

    You forgot Gengar in that list. Capable of levitating across all mediums, and despite the fact they got it right at first, they removed levitate in exchange for an rng based defensive ability on a glass cannon despite Gengar not being anywhere close to overpowered.
    I will never forget.

  • @DodgyBird
    @DodgyBird 9 місяців тому +36

    Watch this idea blow up and
    make Charizard Paradox a common thing

  • @eesev2017
    @eesev2017 9 місяців тому +8

    Where does Dark actually have “control over “darkness””? Dark Void is really the only one like that and it just induces sleep. Dark Pulse is “bad thoughts” not “darkness.”

    • @ErikaCartet
      @ErikaCartet 9 місяців тому +2

      yeah, this is a bit of a translation issue. it’s called あく(悪/aku)type in japanese, which basically means evil or wicked. dark type isn’t actual darkness/absence of light, but more a symbolic darkness of its nature. like someone committing a crime at night not because they’re elementally attuned to shadows, but because they get up to no good under the cover of darkness. it’s all about dirty tactics, intimidation, obfuscation, retribution, and tormenting the opponent. there’s maybe a little overlap with literal darkness with a few very specific moves, which would make sense - literal darkness being used to symbolize evil etc etc, but it’s definitely more a nature/fighting style thing more than an elemental energy thing. which it sounds like you already know, but just providing some extra context for anyone else scrolling the comments.

    • @FrostFire425
      @FrostFire425 9 місяців тому +1

      Umbreon is the most obvious example. It represents the night

    • @nicholaslienandjaja1815
      @nicholaslienandjaja1815 8 днів тому

      ​@@ErikaCartetAlso, most Dark-type Pokemon are actually based on animals and mythical creatures often portrayed as evil in mythology and fiction or stereotypical criminals.

  • @mohanrajgokul7566
    @mohanrajgokul7566 6 місяців тому

    Man , this guy is doing actual pokemon science (unlike actual pokemon professor who just send kids to collect everything for them)

  • @NotHydrex_
    @NotHydrex_ 9 місяців тому +15

    15:55 whyd Mikey sound like he's doing the pokerap 😂

  • @aquamarinerose5405
    @aquamarinerose5405 9 місяців тому +6

    Also though I'm sure you're going to mention it later, but Dragon is ALSO a middle-ground type, seeing just how many moves in the type are centered around a sort of arcane dragon energy that's mechanically and elementally distinct from Fire or similar forms of energy.

    • @faustinomacarronesasados8766
      @faustinomacarronesasados8766 3 місяці тому

      Yeah thats actually true, Dragon Dance , dragon breath , draco meteor… It is much more than being an angry reptile

  • @whipedge
    @whipedge 2 місяці тому +1

    i think they could have added a move called lift off for non flying types that can fly similar to magnet rise.

  • @Davanthall
    @Davanthall 9 місяців тому +16

    "Mega evolution is gone"
    Four days dude. Four days.

  • @Lilith_owo
    @Lilith_owo 9 місяців тому +5

    I know that irl the way Pokémon’s get their typing is based on a mix between gameplay, and design (appearance, story, powers). But I feel like within the logic of the Pokemon universe what has always made sense to me is that typing is a classification based on powers, abilities, elemental control, and egg groups is a classification more similar to irl taxonomy or phylogeny based on genetic relationships and anatomy.

    • @jaschabull2365
      @jaschabull2365 7 місяців тому

      Yeah, I figured the same. We might ask what makes one fire-breathing felid apparently normal while another fire-breathing felid doesn't qualify as normal, but likely to a pokémon professor, it's simply a matter of "litleo is better at pouncing and roaring violently than litten is, while litten is susceptible to ghost-type attacks, unlike litleo, so litleo, unlike litten, is normal-type".
      Still doesn't quite explain why before it's used a specific move, magnemite takes a quadruple damage from earthquake, despite its constantly floating in the air.

  • @TheReviewer65
    @TheReviewer65 9 місяців тому +4

    The restraint on you to not say "Team Sky" despite saying "Flying" so much, you have my respect

  • @Oceane1803
    @Oceane1803 9 місяців тому +8

    11:43 And a Bird type.
    *cough cough*

  • @charizardking1274
    @charizardking1274 Місяць тому +1

    I’m sure if Charizard became a dragon type in the next pokemon game, the community would go from “This guy loves Charizard!? What a simp!” To “Day 58, the Charizards have become sentient, they started to know my name.” Basically, dragon type Charizard would be too powerful

  • @austinmccormick8952
    @austinmccormick8952 9 місяців тому +23

    Grunty Boi acting like not everyone knows about the hideout is amazing

  • @madnessarcade7447
    @madnessarcade7447 9 місяців тому +11

    Lance: you don’t have to be dragon type to be a dragon just need to have the heart of one 0:21

  • @pokemfan951
    @pokemfan951 5 місяців тому

    Growing up, I was that kid who truly believed with all my heart that Celebi should be a Flying-type, purely by its wings, however small they were.

  • @GoatlyGoat
    @GoatlyGoat 9 місяців тому +10

    I feel like I learned something and nothing all at the same time and enjoyed every second of it

  • @maygirl1595
    @maygirl1595 9 місяців тому +9

    I love the way Mikey thinks, this new video style is AWESOME! It scratched an itch in my brain that I didn’t know was itchy! 😅🤣💙💙

  • @calheaven
    @calheaven 7 місяців тому +1

    Great video again! I've been watching for a few years now and your video quality just gets better and better, I had literal chills when you brought it a back around to say just like Charizard at the end!

  • @AceFaz
    @AceFaz 9 місяців тому +13

    It can BE a Dragon, Without having the Dragon Type.

    • @pixelatedsethtube1271
      @pixelatedsethtube1271 8 місяців тому

      Literally it can not

    • @AceFaz
      @AceFaz 8 місяців тому +2

      @@pixelatedsethtube1271
      The Typing generally refers to the Energy that the Pokemon can harness, Like fire pokemon, can harness Fire.
      Dragon Pokemon, can harness Dragon Energy.
      Not Everything that LOOKS Like a dragon, can harness Dragon Energy. Therefore, it can be a dragon without being a Dragon Type.

    • @pixelatedsethtube1271
      @pixelatedsethtube1271 8 місяців тому

      @@AceFaz ah fair enough and good point 👍

    • @arcticbanana66
      @arcticbanana66 8 місяців тому +4

      @@pixelatedsethtube1271 During the "Pokémon Masters EX" New Years 2021 event you could find Lance wearing a Gyarados kimono, and one of his random dialogue lines is:
      "This outfit shows off Gyarados's power as a dragon! What's that, you say? Gyarados isn't a Dragon-type Pokémon? Haha, not all dragons are Dragon-type Pokémon!"

    • @shadenox8164
      @shadenox8164 8 місяців тому

      Personally I think charizard is easy to explain, it's a winged lizard. Not a dragon.

  • @dracoberry
    @dracoberry 9 місяців тому +6

    Meanwhile, there's Iron moth and that jellyfish thing (Niheligo?), which are capable of levitating but have a double weakness to ground and can't have levitate due to their group's abilities.
    Conclusion: Iron moth is a non-iron moth which can't moth. (Why poison? I get that the materials for solar panels/ the ways to get them can be dangerous, but still, why not flying?)
    Niheligo isn't often used for a reason, and it's not because of its stats. (You could tell anyone, who doesn't know wth is this, that it is a water and electric/poison, even a Flying type pokemon and they could believe you, But rock poison just seems absurd)

    • @rokkraljkolesa9317
      @rokkraljkolesa9317 8 місяців тому

      I found one explanation for Iron Moth but I'm not too happy with it: solar radiation

    • @dracoberry
      @dracoberry 8 місяців тому

      @@rokkraljkolesa9317 possibly? Idk

  • @Mooskym
    @Mooskym 7 місяців тому +1

    Everyone's fine with Pokemon having 3 types, until the x8 super-effective moves hit.

  • @KingFurgo
    @KingFurgo 9 місяців тому +24

    3:57 So a Platypus is a bird? Neat

    • @mouthwaterin
      @mouthwaterin 8 місяців тому +4

      All birds are warm blooded and lay eggs, warm blooded egg laying animals are not all birds

    • @macfine
      @macfine 8 місяців тому +2

      " there are more intricacies to this " yes you are very smart. There are exceptions to these generalities. Going on a tangent on all of them like monotremes wasn't the point of the video.

  • @KawiiDino
    @KawiiDino 9 місяців тому +13

    "Mega evolution is gone"
    *four days later*

  • @legocube2524
    @legocube2524 15 днів тому

    You missed Iron moth which is not a flying type and doesn’t have levitate
    And also Gengar but its situation is a bit different because it used to have levitate but doesn’t anymore.
    Nice video BTW I really enjoyed it 😄

  • @jasco.gaming
    @jasco.gaming 9 місяців тому +5

    "But since Mega Evolution is gone..."
    Boy did that age poorly hahaha

  • @dattromboneguy
    @dattromboneguy 9 місяців тому +23

    "Since Mega evolution is gone"... if he had just waited 4 days more, this statement would be true"

    • @Tsukisuthe1
      @Tsukisuthe1 9 місяців тому +3

      True as soon as the video was released for Pokemon legends z my friend spammed me with excitement

  • @the_top_comment
    @the_top_comment 5 місяців тому +1

    ground could work for blastoise because it's on the ground

  • @-BenGaming-
    @-BenGaming- 9 місяців тому +8

    “Ground and rock would never make sense for blastoise”
    Bro HE GOTTA HUGE SHELL ON HIS BACK 😂😂😂

    • @Pokemazda
      @Pokemazda 9 місяців тому +1

      And the shell on its back has to do WHAT with Ground or Rock?

    • @darkdragon7210
      @darkdragon7210 9 місяців тому

      Rock in Gen 1
      Steel in Gen 2 & onwards

    • @Pokemazda
      @Pokemazda 9 місяців тому

      @@darkdragon7210 a Shell is not a rock?? What are you two talking about?

    • @Vary180
      @Vary180 9 місяців тому +2

      @@Pokemazda shell is made of bone not rock, but marowak has bone moves which are ground type so it could work.
      also, other shelled pokemon like omanyte and kabuto are rock water types.

    • @yorecf9641
      @yorecf9641 9 місяців тому

      @@Vary180we've also got Carracosta, an ancient turtle who is a water/rock type.

  • @V.B.T.G
    @V.B.T.G 9 місяців тому +22

    So about Mega Evolutions being gone….

  • @beyondawesomegaming3517
    @beyondawesomegaming3517 2 місяці тому

    “Ground and rock would never make sense for blastoise”
    Blastoise: *learns earthquake and rock slide by tm in almost every game it’s in*