Ferrari Roma Spider Review | Almost Perfect

#Ferrari #FerrariRomaSpider #RomaSpider
Ferrari’s recent entry-level convertibles haven’t quite lived up to the rest of its sparkling range of cars, yet the Roma Spider comes with plenty of promise. We loved the Roma coupe for its stunning looks and handling, so can the Spider with its fabric folding roof carry that through. CAR magazine’s James Dennison finds out.
Buy the November issue of CAR magazine: www.greatmagazines.co.uk/car-...
Chapters:
0:00 - Intro
0:46 - Walkaround and interior
4:05 - Handling
7:21 - Engine and performance
9:16 - Verdict
Want to stay up to date with CAR's videos? Subscribe here:
ua-cam.com/users/CARmagaz...
Get the latest reviews and news from CAR magazine here:
www.carmagazine.co.uk/
Follow us at:
Twitter: @CARmagazine
Instagram: carmagazine
Facebook: CAR Magazine
@JDennisonCars
CAR is the online edition of CAR magazine, Britain's oldest monthly motoring mag. It's the UK's best and fastest online motoring news service, providing a constant stream of scoops, first drives and official pictures of new cars.
Credit: "Dust Scatter, A.wav" by Jonathan Shaw ("InspectorJ") (jshaw.co.uk/sfx)

[@CARmagazineTV]

Is the Roma Spider Ferari's prettiest car of the 21st century? Let us know in the comments below...

[@ovadialevy478]

What’s the ugliest over priced piece of shit
Ferrari is going to hell

[@Ric0806]

I think it says enough without saying too much, beautifully.

[@SLO722]

Another great video review as always, thank you James and CAR!

[@FerrariTestarossa1991]

Every single Ferrari who is made, is a beautiful masterpiece.

[@LoudModeOn]

You mentioned the F-Type, this thing has always reminded me of a Ferrari F-Type. Beautiful car, it's the Ferrari I'd buy.

[@theretoocs]

I live in Australia, and like 80% of the world we are totally metric and use kmh, Britain and the US still use imperial. Would be great with reviews like this that you just put kmh figures on the screen.
I can vaguely convert those figures, but I'm sure Europeans, Aussies and many others would appreciate some info in kmh. Nice review too!

[@Bmontepeque11]

I got a better answer to what happens to the people in the back when you lift the aero piece, nothing. The Roma was always said to be a "2+" not a "2+2" because the seats were never meant for people, just as a shelf for items :)

[@maybe8002]

The video needed more camera angles showing the back half and rear end.

[@shopwithaaron]

Most gorgeous car ever!!

[@jayh5641]

Absolutely the most beautiful especially in a grey. Pure class!

[@CARmagazineTV]

Glad you like it!

[@tjittekamminga5170]

lovely car!

[@chai_n_samosa]

What's this color called? It's beautiful

[@MarcSob22]

Stunning!!

[@grahamcowley8594]

Funnily enough parked my f type convertible S next to one yesterday … the side profile is pretty much the same. I kept having double takes. Just both ends are “sharp” in the Ferrari
Don’t have 611 hp but have plenty, wonder what this has that I don’t … maybe the guys could tell us given it’s 2 to 3 times the price. Don’t get me wrong it’s a good looking car

[@johanlittorin2765]

How's the backseat compared to the coupe, same or even smaller?

[@CARmagazineTV]

We didn't climb in to find out (apologies), but it shouldn't be much different. So very, very small!

[@cbotten106]

Car and Driver says that wind deflector/folding seat back works really well. As a back-seat backrest it looks a bit less than comfortable.
I like all the numbers that you give but cutting the top off a car is all about passion not numbers. As a topless drivers car this Roma is a peach. An expensive peach.
Or as you say, "It's the baby droptop Ferrari that alway should have been." What took Ferrari so long?

[@keithronson2624]

James, as always a brilliant 'Car' review. Sorry but this is no more than a bloody expensive [200K+ You are having a laugh!] MX5.
Looks like an early Jaguar XK convertible. And yes i take it on the chin i could never ever afford anything deemed 'super' but this doesn't add up in any sense. Apologies to all the Prancing Horse fans.

[@CARmagazineTV]

Glad you enjoyed the video!

[@amorosogombe9650]

Why do they still bother with the none back seats at all? Why not dispense with the pretense that anyone will ever sit the and use the space for something useful?

[@stevehunt2125]

Really really really

[@electrolysisenhancer1858]

TO me this is the better competitor to the Mercedes SL63

[@flyinghedgehog3833]

Portofino M nicer..hate haptics!

[@drm888]

Great car ,great review , but to many reallys !!!

[@CARmagazineTV]

Really sorry!

[@drewwin794]

Really?!

[@MUISHAGGY572]

I really noticed this as well.

[@afaha2214]

5mm taller and knocking off 50/50 balance suggests they did not do a very good job

[@TrueDetective007]

F type copy

[@cerbarus3000]

Really?

[@ENGBriseB]

Not as nice as the Aston.

[@HakanNehir]

I hate softtop. Otherwise good design.

[@ilmelangolo]

I hate hard top

[@allnighterist]

296gts looks better

[@SuperMan-tl1nd]

Looks like a cheap Fiat

[@redlineste4283]

Jaguar and Aston Miles better looking.

[@mokyaffe]

Aston yes, but there hasn’t been a good looking jaguar in two decades

[@redlineste4283]

@@mokyaffe F Type better looking than that Ferrari.

[@alessandrob.1354]

U drunk

[@mauriciopavon1]

No

[@lutomson3496]

wonder how much Ferrari is paying Car Magazine to give it a positive review nothing more then an updated California

[@rich8305]

Not a good looking car at all.A poor mix of Aston and Jaguar styles

[@369dabbler]

Clueless

[@TheLexy131313]

It's more a modern take on the Ferrari Daytona convertible.

[@Shaf-ci4om]

I disagree. Its a very good looking car but what doesn't work in this car is the touch buttons. Only thing i hate about modern Ferraris is the touch and haptic buttons. Also the fact regulations made Ferraris more silent