60, mostly carnivore since '18. Since I lift daily, I'm adding carnivore honey for the glycogen, so not zero-carb all the time. So much fitter than in middle age, ironically.
High carb centenarians. 2010 study title: "Discovery of Novel Sources of Vitamin B12 in Traditional Korean Foods from Nutritional Surveys of Centenarians." These Korean centenarians consume a high carb diet with 87% of plant foods and 13% from animal foods. They have almost no access to synthetic vitamins, supplements or fortified foods. Centenarian men take in about 1700 calories per day and about 300 grams of carbs per day. These people are set in their ways they do not play games with diets or experiment with any type of money making fad diet.
@@Parker_Miller_M.S. Incorrect. Look at the only somewhat decent trial with fiber intake and what it shows. "Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms" by Kok-Sun Ho et al.
@@VerySeriousUser why would I look at a single trial when I can look at a 2022 umbrella review of 52 meta-analyses of randomizing controlled trials? Fu et al 2022 published in the journal frontiers nutrition 52 meta analyses were included with over 47,000 people. To quote the papers abstract with some abbreviations: "higher dietary fiber intake was significantly associated with reductions in parameters involving glycemic control [this is improvement]..., fasting insulin..., HOMA-IR..., HbA1c.... In terms of lipid profiles, higher dietary fiber was associated with significant reductions in serum level of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol but not triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Higher dietary fiber intake was also significantly associated with improved tumor necrosis factor alpha serum levels while no significant effect was observed for c-reactive protein. Finally blood pressure was also significantly improved following dietary fiber intake." So fiber is beneficial based on meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Then we look at dose response relationships within prospective cohorts and see even further benefits including lower risk of cancers, lower risk of CVD, lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower risk of all cause death. These are dose dependent.
@@VerySeriousUser I would rather look at an umbrella review of 52 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with over 47,000 people. Fu et al 2022 published in frontiers nutrition showed fiber was overwhelmingly beneficial. Reynolds et al 2019 meta-analyzed cohort studies and showed more whole grains were associated with reduced risk for various health outcomes. This is showing health benefits. Meta-analysis of other prospective studies corroborate this finding with reduced risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and all cause death for more fiber in a dose dependent manner. Fiber is overwhelmingly health promoting, a single trial is not good evidence to show the true effects.
I would ask Dr. Layman in his prioritization of protein and the either/or choice of saturated fats or carbs, depending on an individual's level of exercise, how he views the liver's ability to rid the body of it's collected toxins via the biliary pathway? Dietary fats moving into the duodenum trigger regular gallbladder bile release, thus preventing gall bladder concentrate hardening into stones. The obvious pathology of lodged gall stones are multiplied by the probable re-absorption of toxins into surrounding tissues and organs. Besides flushing toxins from the liver, bile also works to release crucial vitamins contained in dietary fats such as A, D, E and K. Breakdown of carbs in the stomach do not often require pH levels that can trigger bile as food moves to the duodenum, which not only sets up conditions for incomplete digestion, but also the infiltration of bacteria that are generally eliminated in full-strength stomach pH levels required for effective digestion of fats and protein. Incomplete digestion due to weak acid release and absent bile forces intestines into fermentation to extract bio-available nutrients, promoting bloating, gas, bacterial imbalances.
It's the diet they will stick to that helps them regulate their blood sugar, retain muscle strength, become healthier. The better you feel the more active you become and gradually weight loss is also a natural occurrence. If you do something crazy to drop, weight, as only goal probably will get the yo-yo weight issues. If you start, out on intense exercise, most give up in a couple of weeks.
Every time I listen to Dr Don I get confused. Percy says he likes people to take 130 carbohydrates times that by four and that’s around 520 cal anything above that he is saying and I agree you need to earn them well you need to earn them even up to 130 anyway first, he says if you have 300 g of carbohydrates above that threshold of 130 then you need 3 to 5 hours of exercise to do that you mentioned about 50 to 60 carbohydrates per hour and I agree with that however then he says if you take in 300 calof carbohydrates then you would need to do that which is it is a 300 cal or 300 or 300 carbs big difference
We need amino acids, fatty acids and water. There's no need to consume plants of any kind. They may taste good but they all have anti-nutrients and toxic defense chemicals - neither of which should be consumed. Seems like meat (preferably fatty beef) and eggs is the optimal diet for human beings. That and resistance training is the key to optimal health and vitality based on everything I've seen, heard and read. Also, I prefer Prof. Bart Kay's view on calories.
Yes, protein is important but there is such a thing as "rabbit starvation." And carbs in our fat-burning metabolism are damaging, full stop. That leaves us with fat as the main source of calories. Im always disappointed in the lack of understanding of just how much fat we truley need. Fat (animal, saturated), in the absence of carbs, really is the panacea to everything related to exercise, health, disease...
Requirement for saturated fat? How? We can make saturated fatty acids of varying lengths, thus we do not need to consume saturated fats. We cannot make essential unsaturated omega 6 linolenic acid or omega 3 ALA so we must consume those. What evidence shows an absolute necessity for saturated fat consumption? Carbs can be stored as glycogen in muscle and the liver. Its not just fat or energy to be immediately used. What evidence is being referenced to state one needs 3 hours of intense exercise (no definition given btw either in terms of % max heart rate or METs) to justfy 300g of total daily carbs? More activity is generally a good thing but I dont achieve 3 hours of "intense" exercise daily. Risk of carbohydrates? Refined carbs? Sure, it's well know that refined carbs are deleterious to health. Fibrous carbohydrate on the other hand from whole grains or fruits and vegetables? Not risky in the slightest. Reynolds and colleagues 2019 did the largest meta-analysis on carbohydrates to date and looked at refined vs whole grain carbs and there was a dose response relationship with more whole brain carbs having more benefits. The world cancer research fund 2018 document on fruits vegetables and whole grains also shows benefits to whole grains. At the very end as the video fades out he states peoeole dont get enough protein. People in the US on average eat about 1.1g/kg of protein per day so people are not even close to deficient in protein. Achieving 1.4-1.6g/kg appears to maximize muscle growth from resistance training so this increase is not enormous. There is so much misinformation here with no nuance given to create soundbites. Its not helping to provide clarity.
What is the difference between glucose, fructose, galactose from fibrous sources and the same three from refined sources (apart from we being less able to absorb all of them from a fibrous plant, let's say)?
@@VerySeriousUser the food matrix from whole food fibrous carbs sources have lower glycemic loads firstly, and also contain various vitamins and minerals. There is also less simple sugar in a whole foods with fiber as part of this food matrix. This is like comparing a whole apple to apple juice. The apple has fiber the juice does not. The fiber is overwhelmingly health promoting as we see time and time again
Omega 6 are in animal fats with highest quality and bioavailability and without risk of oxidation. Defense mechanism, limiting human potential and health by getting the harmful toxins out first. Evoltionary developed mechanism is not here for us to thrive, but to survive, elimite toxins and allow body to thrive instead of survive. Byproduct of ketones being used as energy is not even comparible to glucose. Living vs surviving. He said 300g of carbs, than 300 kcals from carbs, I think he has no idea what he actually talks about here. Undigestable material for human body, do the study for 20 years and you have everyone dead, toxins from the undigested rotting fiber inside your colon can boost your metabolism in short term to survive, but will not hold for long. Another defense mechanism. Measurements done by man-made values is Scientology. They are using the wrong technology to measure the protein, its false. Unfortunetally, just a few things at this time of universe are scientific truth in nutrition science hamsterwheel. Creatine is healthy, astaxanthin is healthy, protein and fats are healthy (in healthy doses). All the rest is theology and you just choose what lie to believe. Simply stated, given the healthy values as dose makes the poison, which is truth, just these 4 things are scientifically proven after the study survive all the laws of racionality, human logic and empirical evidence for adequate time (human lifetime), where you end up being off BETTER with your overall health, than without these. Everything else is just belief, theology and guessing.
@@Parker_Miller_M.S. So, no difference apart from the thing I mentioned, basically. So you're claiming that these three molecules are dangerous while also not being dangerous in the slightest, because "food matrix". Neither the apple nor the apple juice is good for you although the juice is the same sugar but more concentrated. The glycemic index is kinda crappy as other factors impact the digestion of it more than the very noisy data they've gathered and called the glycemic index. To me it seems like your argument boils down to "some factors decrease the sugar uptake from some sources, which makes it not dangerous at all but sugar uptake from other sources which is usually arbitrarily higher is dangerous".
@@VerySeriousUser never claimed the molecules of different sugar types were dangerous. Straw man. Apples are healthy promoting. 2016 meta-analysis of observational studies by Fabiani et al showed highest consumption of apples vs lowest consumption has reduced risk of various cancers. Seems pretty healthy promoting to me.
The concept of health in "The 23 Former Doctor Truths" book completely explains this. I wish I read it sooner.
I'm 76. My personal dietary guideline is simple. 100% carnivore. Zero percent carbs. No diagnoses, no pills, just great health!
60, mostly carnivore since '18. Since I lift daily, I'm adding carnivore honey for the glycogen, so not zero-carb all the time. So much fitter than in middle age, ironically.
High carb centenarians. 2010 study title: "Discovery of Novel Sources of Vitamin B12 in Traditional Korean Foods from Nutritional Surveys of Centenarians." These Korean centenarians consume a high carb diet with 87% of plant foods and 13% from animal foods. They have almost no access to synthetic vitamins, supplements or fortified foods. Centenarian men take in about 1700 calories per day and about 300 grams of carbs per day. These people are set in their ways they do not play games with diets or experiment with any type of money making fad diet.
I'll stay carnivore, thank you. And since I've really upped my protein consumption I've lost more body fat and gotten stronger. No carbs needed.
Why do ‘carnivores’ and vegans turn up in the comments of all the nutrition podcasts to make comments about how marvelous their personal
choice is?
The body does not require one gram of Carbs. I agree..I am 100%carnivore
Yet our bodies can handle carbohydrates just fine if we get up off our butts and move daily.
You also don't require a savings account, air conditioning or a car but it makes life better.
I just got done listening to your book ma'am. I loved it. I restarted it immediately.
Sounds good. So If I eat steak and eggs. I get protein and fat. I do not need any carbs. Got it.
Fiber is overwhelmingly beneficial to health. Would recommend getting as much fiber as you can each day.
@@Parker_Miller_M.S. Incorrect. Look at the only somewhat decent trial with fiber intake and what it shows. "Stopping or reducing dietary fiber intake reduces constipation and its associated symptoms" by Kok-Sun Ho et al.
@@VerySeriousUser why would I look at a single trial when I can look at a 2022 umbrella review of 52 meta-analyses of randomizing controlled trials?
Fu et al 2022 published in the journal frontiers nutrition
52 meta analyses were included with over 47,000 people. To quote the papers abstract with some abbreviations: "higher dietary fiber intake was significantly associated with reductions in parameters involving glycemic control [this is improvement]..., fasting insulin..., HOMA-IR..., HbA1c.... In terms of lipid profiles, higher dietary fiber was associated with significant reductions in serum level of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol but not triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Higher dietary fiber intake was also significantly associated with improved tumor necrosis factor alpha serum levels while no significant effect was observed for c-reactive protein. Finally blood pressure was also significantly improved following dietary fiber intake."
So fiber is beneficial based on meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Then we look at dose response relationships within prospective cohorts and see even further benefits including lower risk of cancers, lower risk of CVD, lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower risk of all cause death. These are dose dependent.
@@VerySeriousUser I would rather look at an umbrella review of 52 meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with over 47,000 people. Fu et al 2022 published in frontiers nutrition showed fiber was overwhelmingly beneficial.
Reynolds et al 2019 meta-analyzed cohort studies and showed more whole grains were associated with reduced risk for various health outcomes. This is showing health benefits.
Meta-analysis of other prospective studies corroborate this finding with reduced risk of CVD, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and all cause death for more fiber in a dose dependent manner.
Fiber is overwhelmingly health promoting, a single trial is not good evidence to show the true effects.
I would ask Dr. Layman in his prioritization of protein and the either/or choice of saturated fats or carbs, depending on an individual's level of exercise, how he views the liver's ability to rid the body of it's collected toxins via the biliary pathway? Dietary fats moving into the duodenum trigger regular gallbladder bile release, thus preventing gall bladder concentrate hardening into stones. The obvious pathology of lodged gall stones are multiplied by the probable re-absorption of toxins into surrounding tissues and organs. Besides flushing toxins from the liver, bile also works to release crucial vitamins contained in dietary fats such as A, D, E and K. Breakdown of carbs in the stomach do not often require pH levels that can trigger bile as food moves to the duodenum, which not only sets up conditions for incomplete digestion, but also the infiltration of bacteria that are generally eliminated in full-strength stomach pH levels required for effective digestion of fats and protein. Incomplete digestion due to weak acid release and absent bile forces intestines into fermentation to extract bio-available nutrients, promoting bloating, gas, bacterial imbalances.
It's the diet they will stick to that helps them regulate their blood sugar, retain muscle strength, become healthier. The better you feel the more active you become and gradually weight loss is also a natural occurrence. If you do something crazy to drop, weight, as only goal probably will get the yo-yo weight issues. If you start, out on intense exercise, most give up in a couple of weeks.
OMAD steak, eggs, sardines, milk ( one litre organic for potassium boost ).
The Proper Human Diet for me. I've never felt better on any other diet.
When did the carb RDA change? I have items in my fridge just recently bought indicating the carb RDA is still around 260 g.
You're right. But this guy has been saying 130g for years and no one challenges him.
Actually the recommended macros are 60/30/10 carbs/fat/protein.
Every time I listen to Dr Don I get confused. Percy says he likes people to take 130 carbohydrates times that by four and that’s around 520 cal anything above that he is saying and I agree you need to earn them well you need to earn them even up to 130 anyway first, he says if you have 300 g of carbohydrates above that threshold of 130 then you need 3 to 5 hours of exercise to do that you mentioned about 50 to 60 carbohydrates per hour and I agree with that however then he says if you take in 300 calof carbohydrates then you would need to do that which is it is a 300 cal or 300 or 300 carbs big difference
We need amino acids, fatty acids and water. There's no need to consume plants of any kind. They may taste good but they all have anti-nutrients and toxic defense chemicals - neither of which should be consumed. Seems like meat (preferably fatty beef) and eggs is the optimal diet for human beings. That and resistance training is the key to optimal health and vitality based on everything I've seen, heard and read.
Also, I prefer Prof. Bart Kay's view on calories.
Is there a meal plan based on calories I could reference
Love your jersey Dr Layman! Viva Italia! Your even smarter than I thought ;)
Yes, protein is important but there is such a thing as "rabbit starvation." And carbs in our fat-burning metabolism are damaging, full stop. That leaves us with fat as the main source of calories. Im always disappointed in the lack of understanding of just how much fat we truley need.
Fat (animal, saturated), in the absence of carbs, really is the panacea to everything related to exercise, health, disease...
Jingle of a dog's collar would be good right now. . .
How is that yerba mate?
Requirement for saturated fat? How? We can make saturated fatty acids of varying lengths, thus we do not need to consume saturated fats. We cannot make essential unsaturated omega 6 linolenic acid or omega 3 ALA so we must consume those. What evidence shows an absolute necessity for saturated fat consumption?
Carbs can be stored as glycogen in muscle and the liver. Its not just fat or energy to be immediately used.
What evidence is being referenced to state one needs 3 hours of intense exercise (no definition given btw either in terms of % max heart rate or METs) to justfy 300g of total daily carbs? More activity is generally a good thing but I dont achieve 3 hours of "intense" exercise daily.
Risk of carbohydrates? Refined carbs? Sure, it's well know that refined carbs are deleterious to health. Fibrous carbohydrate on the other hand from whole grains or fruits and vegetables? Not risky in the slightest. Reynolds and colleagues 2019 did the largest meta-analysis on carbohydrates to date and looked at refined vs whole grain carbs and there was a dose response relationship with more whole brain carbs having more benefits. The world cancer research fund 2018 document on fruits vegetables and whole grains also shows benefits to whole grains.
At the very end as the video fades out he states peoeole dont get enough protein. People in the US on average eat about 1.1g/kg of protein per day so people are not even close to deficient in protein. Achieving 1.4-1.6g/kg appears to maximize muscle growth from resistance training so this increase is not enormous.
There is so much misinformation here with no nuance given to create soundbites. Its not helping to provide clarity.
What is the difference between glucose, fructose, galactose from fibrous sources and the same three from refined sources (apart from we being less able to absorb all of them from a fibrous plant, let's say)?
@@VerySeriousUser the food matrix from whole food fibrous carbs sources have lower glycemic loads firstly, and also contain various vitamins and minerals. There is also less simple sugar in a whole foods with fiber as part of this food matrix. This is like comparing a whole apple to apple juice. The apple has fiber the juice does not. The fiber is overwhelmingly health promoting as we see time and time again
Omega 6 are in animal fats with highest quality and bioavailability and without risk of oxidation.
Defense mechanism, limiting human potential and health by getting the harmful toxins out first. Evoltionary developed mechanism is not here for us to thrive, but to survive, elimite toxins and allow body to thrive instead of survive. Byproduct of ketones being used as energy is not even comparible to glucose. Living vs surviving.
He said 300g of carbs, than 300 kcals from carbs, I think he has no idea what he actually talks about here.
Undigestable material for human body, do the study for 20 years and you have everyone dead, toxins from the undigested rotting fiber inside your colon can boost your metabolism in short term to survive, but will not hold for long. Another defense mechanism.
Measurements done by man-made values is Scientology. They are using the wrong technology to measure the protein, its false.
Unfortunetally, just a few things at this time of universe are scientific truth in nutrition science hamsterwheel. Creatine is healthy, astaxanthin is healthy, protein and fats are healthy (in healthy doses). All the rest is theology and you just choose what lie to believe. Simply stated, given the healthy values as dose makes the poison, which is truth, just these 4 things are scientifically proven after the study survive all the laws of racionality, human logic and empirical evidence for adequate time (human lifetime), where you end up being off BETTER with your overall health, than without these. Everything else is just belief, theology and guessing.
@@Parker_Miller_M.S. So, no difference apart from the thing I mentioned, basically. So you're claiming that these three molecules are dangerous while also not being dangerous in the slightest, because "food matrix". Neither the apple nor the apple juice is good for you although the juice is the same sugar but more concentrated.
The glycemic index is kinda crappy as other factors impact the digestion of it more than the very noisy data they've gathered and called the glycemic index.
To me it seems like your argument boils down to "some factors decrease the sugar uptake from some sources, which makes it not dangerous at all but sugar uptake from other sources which is usually arbitrarily higher is dangerous".
@@VerySeriousUser never claimed the molecules of different sugar types were dangerous. Straw man.
Apples are healthy promoting. 2016 meta-analysis of observational studies by Fabiani et al showed highest consumption of apples vs lowest consumption has reduced risk of various cancers. Seems pretty healthy promoting to me.
Just give me some People Chow
✅️💪