From the Beginning to Now | Lawrence Krauss | EP 182

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • This episode was recorded on May 7th 2021
    On this episode of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan is accompanied by American-Canadian theoretical physicist and cosmologist Lawrence M. Krauss. Throughout his career, Dr. Krauss has made remarkable contributions to the field of research on particle physics and cosmology. Dr. Krauss formerly worked at Yale University, Case Western Reserve University, and Arizona State University. Dr. Krauss also founded ASU’s Origins Project, a non-profit corporation that holds public panel discussions on science, culture, and social issues. Some of his work includes popular books such as The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe from Nothing.
    Jordan and Lawrence sit down to discuss a variety of topics in the mind-boggling world of quantum physics. They spend time discussing generated models of the beginning of our universe, the lawbreaking complexities of quantum physics, the ramifications related to entropy, the usefulness of the scientific method, as well as the instinctive behaviour for religious compulsion among human beings.
    The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast can be found at
    www.jordanbpeterson.com/podcast/
    More information on Lawrence M. Krauss can be found on his website and Twitter linked below:
    www.lawrencemkrauss.com/
    / lkrauss1
    __________________
    [00:00] Introduction.
    [2:00] Jordan kicks things off by positing a description of entropy for discussion relating to complexity in systems of matter, time, and energy.
    [13:00] Krauss expounds on the value of overcoming failure.
    [16:00] Peterson prompts Krauss to expand on times in his career where the redirection of an experiment led to incredible discovery that was not related to his original intention or hypothesis.
    [21:30] The science of cosmology, taking the listeners back to the beginning of our universe through theoretical models.
    [27:00] The size of the universe, is it a reasonable question to ask?
    [41:00] Exploring the concept of time relative to change, space, and matter.
    [44:30] Talking about the creation of the universe looking at matter versus antimatter distribution.
    [56:00] The current picture (based on models of the matter and antimatter at the beginning of the universe).
    [1:01:00] The ability of the laws of physics to fluctuate at different energy levels (scale, size). The formation of all the foundational elements in existence.
    [1:10:00] Quantum fluctuation, quantum mechanics, quantum ground state, the resonant wavelength of electrons, and much more.
    [1:20:30] Lawrence Krauss gives his summarization of the interpretation of quantum mechanics and complexity.
    [1:25:30] Debating meaning, truth, reality, and reason in the universe. The complex and strained relationship between the scientific method and religious instinct towards our existence.
    [1:43:00] Jordan asks Lawrence to comment on the religious instinct removed by modern atheists popping up again in a politicalized form of secular humanism.
    #Physics #Religion #LawrenceKrauss
    Jordan B Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist, and the author of the multi-million copy bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, #1 for nonfiction in 2018 in the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, Brazil and Norway, and slated for translation into 50 languages.
    Dr. Peterson has appeared on many popular podcasts and shows, including the Joe Rogan Experience (877, 958, 1006), The Rubin Report, H3H3 (#37), and many more. Dr. Peterson’s own podcast has focused mainly on his lecture series, covering a great deal of psychology and historical content.
    // SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL //
    Newsletter: linktr.ee/DrJordanBPeterson
    Donations: www.jordanbpeterson.com/donate
    // COURSES //
    Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
    Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com/
    Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com/
    // BOOKS //
    Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
    12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
    Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
    // LINKS //
    Website: jordanbpeterson.com/
    Events: jordanbpeterson.com/events/
    Blog: jordanbpeterson.com/blog/
    Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/podcast/
    Reading List: jordanbpeterson.com/great-books/
    Merchandise: teespring.com/stores/jordanbp...
    // SOCIAL //
    Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
    Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
    Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
    // SPONSORS //
    For Advertising Inquiries, visit www.advertisecast.com/TheJord...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @locutus2962
    @locutus2962 2 роки тому +1208

    I'm a welder, and I listen to JP's podcasts pretty much all day while I weld. It makes me enjoy my job like 5x more than usual. It's like getting a college education while I make money.

    • @abudrda
      @abudrda 2 роки тому +68

      Totally agree 👍 we shouldn't stop educate ourselves till we die.

    • @r.g.1166
      @r.g.1166 2 роки тому +22

      I'm trying to get my son into welding. If you have a little time someday I would like ask you some questions.
      Peace!

    • @devlincummingspas1682
      @devlincummingspas1682 2 роки тому +42

      I’m an electrician. I do the same thing. Hahaha

    • @GoodOrion2113
      @GoodOrion2113 2 роки тому +17

      Lol same here in Cosmetic Inspection

    • @erichschinzel6486
      @erichschinzel6486 2 роки тому +15

      Funny you say that, feel the same

  • @chrissimpson7634
    @chrissimpson7634 2 роки тому +472

    "Education shouldn't be based on answers, it should be based on questions." - Lawrence Krauss
    Very well said!

    • @redmed10
      @redmed10 2 роки тому +7

      So you're saying students should be in control.

    • @BP7BlackPearl
      @BP7BlackPearl 2 роки тому +32

      @@redmed10 He is saying the teacher should instill in the kids the desire to ask more questions.

    • @redmed10
      @redmed10 2 роки тому +10

      @@BP7BlackPearl
      I know exactly what he is saying. But he shows no appreciation whatsoever of the practicalities of teaching 30 kids in a class and having to teach to a curriculum
      It takes a special kind of teacher who can actually do what krauss is advocating. These type of communicators can make much more money outside the teaching profession and with none of the headaches of teaching. The type of teaching krauss advocates would cost double if not treble what is generally provided in public school system today. It could be done but would require higher taxes which people are against. I'm just asking krauss to live in the real world on this subject. If he's talking about higher education system fair enough. But I don't think he is.

    • @BP7BlackPearl
      @BP7BlackPearl 2 роки тому +3

      @@redmed10 I have no idea how u come up with that conclusion. Why would it cost more? We already have some teachers who do that and they don't get paid more.
      Many teachers are just lazy, or get that way. A good teacher is interested in their students as well as the topic. Good teachers voluntarily work overtime without pay cuz they enjoy it.

    • @redmed10
      @redmed10 2 роки тому +7

      @@BP7BlackPearl
      Go on a few teachers forums or Facebook groups and see what they say. Why do people out their kids in private schools. Smaller classes. More one to one tuition. Less stressed teachers. And that all costs a lot of money. Surely you know how expensive that can be. Parents pay this because they know the advantages of these things. I hear of teachers paying for school supplies in public schools out of their own pocket. Of course some teachers give their own time for the kids who need a bit extra help. But if more money was spent and more teachers were employed , individual wouldn't have to do it out of the goodness of their hearts. Would you do extra hours of work for no extra pay? Why do you presume teachers should be expected to do it just because they are in teaching profession?

  • @CaptainBlaine
    @CaptainBlaine Рік тому +19

    Lawrence Krauss is one of my favorite educators because he (usually lol) looks like he enjoys it. Some very intelligent people get frustrated or annoyed with JP’s questions but I think to a certain extent JP is asking because he wants to learn. And Lawrence is happy to indulge and share his knowledge. Love it.

  • @Gennys
    @Gennys 2 роки тому +9

    What a DELIGHTFUL conversation Jordan and Lawrence had. I can't wait for more conversations on this level from both.

  • @aleksybalazinski
    @aleksybalazinski 3 роки тому +260

    One of my favorite conversations I've ever listened to so far. It wasn't merely an exchange of ideas but rather a pursuit of truth, and you don't find this in the public discourse very often.

    • @hellomate639
      @hellomate639 3 роки тому +9

      I started getting a little annoyed with Krauss at the end because he kind of just did the annoying thing of getting too allergic to religion to develop an openness enough to discuss it in an abstract sense, without even crossing the threshold to entertain it in a sense that doesn't actually make any metaphysical claims.
      I worry that such an attitude will hinder the next discussion from being as interesting as possible. I also suspect that attitude is primarily what causes rationalists to persist in their harsh views on religion.

    • @danteinferno175
      @danteinferno175 3 роки тому +9

      Peterson and his guest were on a roll in this podcast. They have great synergy.
      Looking forward to Peterson in the "hot seat" on Krauss' podcast!

    • @lazygam3r183
      @lazygam3r183 3 роки тому +10

      @@hellomate639 In the beginning after I became an atheist, I too had a strong disregard and contempt for religion. That has definitely changed with time and I now no longer care whether people are religious or not and view religion as key part of our history as a species.

    • @Dunted
      @Dunted 3 роки тому +5

      @@hellomate639 I think Krauss was suspicious of Peterson attempting to learn as much about theoretical physics as possible, just to learn its ultimate limitations so he could 'smuggle in Jesus' to fill the gaps.
      Supernatural shenanigans indeed!

    • @hellomate639
      @hellomate639 3 роки тому +4

      @@Dunted I think that's a projection that is rather insulting to Dr. Krauss's intelligence.

  • @stephendesjardins3626
    @stephendesjardins3626 3 роки тому +359

    I am so moved by Mr. Peterson's raging determined refusal to allow the dying of the light. Rage on, sir. Rage on.

    • @RussianBot4Christ
      @RussianBot4Christ 3 роки тому +18

      Rage like a toddler running into a semi truck.

    • @MarkJones-gt2qd
      @MarkJones-gt2qd 3 роки тому +33

      One of my favourite poems. Also D Thomas best work. I'm old and half welsh, so we did all that in school, but I'm guessing not everyone knows what you are referencing. Perfect for Peterson!
      Do not go gentle into that good night,
      Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
      Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
      Because their words had forked no lightning they
      Do not go gentle into that good night.
      Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
      Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
      Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
      And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
      Do not go gentle into that good night.
      Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
      Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light
      .
      And you, my father, there on the sad height,
      Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
      Do not go gentle into that good night.
      Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    • @Io-Io-Io
      @Io-Io-Io 3 роки тому +3

      We all must do that. I do

    • @IrregularPineapples
      @IrregularPineapples 3 роки тому +5

      @@MarkJones-gt2qd it became very famous after the movie "Interstellar", most people know of the poem thanks to it by now.

    • @hellalpha
      @hellalpha 3 роки тому +4

      @@IrregularPineapples On the soundtrack you have the whole cast reading out the poem.

  • @em1483
    @em1483 2 роки тому +40

    I need to watch this about 5x; sooo much incredible discussion/info here. Impossible to absorb in one listen! Love the energy here; one of my favorite JP podcasts so far!

  • @greasybean0843
    @greasybean0843 Рік тому +4

    Two of my favorite fields coming together to make life make more sense. Thank you Jordan for all you do for people all around the world. You truly are an inspiration!

  • @skateebee
    @skateebee 3 роки тому +254

    I don't think I've ever seen Jordan so excited to speak with someone! Also kudos to him for stepping way outside of his comfort zone!

    • @bendavis2234
      @bendavis2234 2 роки тому +9

      He appears so much healthier than in some of his earlier podcasts, emotionally and physically. I hope the continuation of these podcasts serves as something that’s therapeutic to him and aids Dr. Peterson in his recovery!

    • @cristohv
      @cristohv 2 роки тому +1

      This comment has been repeated in almost every podcast he does lmao

    • @emajinitllc3831
      @emajinitllc3831 2 роки тому +1

      you must never really watched Jordan then

  • @odinsclone3436
    @odinsclone3436 3 роки тому +12

    I spent 4 years with a girl very similar to this,,.we have
    a kid together and it took me 4 years before I saw the
    reflection in the smoke and mirrors. I thank God
    everyday for delivering me from that monstrous
    woman. I ended up finding the strength and insight to
    get my daughter and go by listening to your videos here on UA-cam and I consume and scrap of
    information you provide. I've since read two
    books by you. One them being 1 2 rules to life. I
    have implemented as much new positive direction into
    my life and have decided to shoulder as much
    responsibility I'm capable shouldering alone without
    loosing mysql'f. And it has impacted my life in so many
    positive ways. I think back those darkest
    times. and it's a truly humbling and beautiful time.
    because from where I'm sitting now all I can see is a
    chapter in my life necessary to grow my character
    and my soul into what I now know as my best life. And
    the best part is my best life gets better every day in
    some incremental way weather small or large it
    improves because I don't lay down and go to sleep
    without improving at least one thing every day in
    order to make tomorrow and shade better than today.
    Thank you jordan peterson . I grew up with
    a single mom addicted to drugs and alcohol I never met my father and it took
    me until I was 30 years of age before a friend suggested I check you out .and that day at
    that exact moment you spoke to me in a way nothing
    or anyone had ever spoke to me before. It truly
    changed my life just like that. And it was the best
    most empowering day of my life. There has been some
    rough times during my evolution no doubt. But I
    appreciated every moment all the same. I embraced
    that struggle. I try to be happy to have even been granted the
    opertunity, and provided with the knowledge, and
    perseverance to push through those hard times and
    not only push through them but to grow from them. And learn from them. It's truly remarkable what a simple change in the way you see yourself and interpret your turmoil can and will make in your life just simply by saying no. I refuse to lay down and just accept this . This will not be what I was capable of. This is not my best effort.
    You changed my life. the first video I watched of yours captivated me and I began consuming anything I could find with your name on it. And implementing it as best I could and it completely changed how I live day to day. How I take each hardship. How i face my deepest fears. I learned how to be a man. And more importantly how control the monster within. How to call on it when I need to be heard. And how to speak with purpose and conviction . Thank you I'm sorry I wrote you a novel but I remember hearing an interview you did and you said when you need to hear positivity that you often turn to comments on your videos. Maybe you will read this . Or better maybe it helps somone else to take the reins in there own life and start making life an opertunity rather than it being there prison like I spent the first 30 years of my life.

  • @dasherfrommenasher
    @dasherfrommenasher 2 роки тому +5

    WOW! Fascinating and exciting exchange between JP and LK. I am staggered with appreciation by the ability of each to draw out the very best from the other! I agree with every comment shared over the past 7 months, since this discussion was posted. I shall now listen to part 2 and follow-up with joyful reading from Genesis, Psalms and Romans!

  • @darthwrath4236
    @darthwrath4236 2 роки тому +4

    Lawrence Krauss and Brian Greene are the best theoretical physicist I've ever listened to as a layman who never even took 1 minute of physics class. They let you speak and complete your sentences before correcting you. Genuinely interested to know your questions.
    Never treat you like an idiot. Which is why I'll always listen to any videos of em. Just found this one, about 57 minutes in and it felt like 5 minutes. You have no idea how hard it is for me to spend more than 10 minutes on a video that's not related with comedy/satire. My ADD seems to just vanish when I listen to Lawrence, Brian, Dawkins and sometimes even Jordan.
    Thank you for this Jordan. Thank you for making it free as well.

  • @RhodieRowley
    @RhodieRowley 3 роки тому +44

    I love hearing Jordan speak. I mostly have no idea what he is saying, but I can listen to it all day.

    • @NoUsernamae
      @NoUsernamae 3 роки тому +4

      That's pretty much most of his fanbase. None of you have any idea what he's saying or if it's correct or incredibly wrong.

    • @scratchpenny
      @scratchpenny 3 роки тому +1

      @@NoUsernamae I think that's true of any public figure with a large fanbase. There is always the cult of personality with popular public figures. That doesn't mean those figures don't provide some value, however. People can come away with what they find useful, as has always been done in mass communication. Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of being an intellectual. Nor do they have the time.

    • @NoUsernamae
      @NoUsernamae 3 роки тому +1

      @@scratchpenny it's debatable. Any public figure that has a following like this provides very little value. People turn them into a projected ideal, get attached to that image, and spend much of their time being emotionally moved whenever they see something for or against what that person has said. Psychologically, having an image to follow is catastrophic because it is an impediment to self knowledge. But of course I'm also no longer just talking about Peterson, like you said, it happens with all, more so with Peterson because anger resonates with people an insane amount in the current times, because we are outwardly civilised, and inwardly a mess, I don't want to go into the details of that but it's a topic that must be explored. These people seem to be helping. But in most cases. They aren't. They're just a placeholder for the collective unconscious to project itself.

    • @NoUsernamae
      @NoUsernamae 3 роки тому +1

      @We're living in a paradox. I do. I listened to him for quite a while, not because "I loved hearing him talk", but because I wanted to understand his ideas as well as possible since I thought they were very useful, unfortunately or fortunately I found out that wasn't the case. And then I realised most people don't even bother understanding the ideas he tries to spread.

    • @theflu6734
      @theflu6734 3 роки тому

      Hahaha yeah seriously, but somehow I always know what he's getting at

  • @TheZagiello
    @TheZagiello 3 роки тому +554

    After they finished podcast they started playing Warzone.

    • @plimithsock
      @plimithsock 3 роки тому +41

      Lol yelling I’m in the gulag

    • @grunt6799
      @grunt6799 3 роки тому +10

      HE'S ONE SHOOOOOOOT!

    • @ChezzyKnytt
      @ChezzyKnytt 3 роки тому +27

      @@plimithsock The image of JP fighting his way out of the gulag cracks me up lmao

    • @christianebers
      @christianebers 3 роки тому +2

      Physicists don’t go to gulag. Only Jordan go to gulag.

    • @marcos-gn8sq
      @marcos-gn8sq 3 роки тому

      and that's that.

  • @thetodhunter2124
    @thetodhunter2124 2 роки тому +26

    This was a particularly memorable one. Really enjoyed it from beginning to end. Such high quality conversation. I think it is key that both participants take the time to define context to words or phrases which both Jordan and Lawrence did regularly.
    I get the feeling they both enjoyed this one too

  • @sangeetsiv
    @sangeetsiv 2 роки тому +76

    I'll say this for Dr. Jordan Peterson, whatever his personal motivations, the man is great at a debate. It's just interesting stuff and if you're worried about political bias you shouldn't allow that to censor yourself from watching people who don't align with your beliefs. Diverse perspectives really do matter. Lawrence is his usual great self in this, glad to see he's enjoying it.

    • @r0ky_M
      @r0ky_M 2 роки тому +6

      You need to watch JP debate Harris and Dillahunty..he makes a right fool of himself.

    • @ashok.vardhan.g
      @ashok.vardhan.g 2 роки тому +6

      @@r0ky_M I have watched his interaction with Harris at Pangburn, and in my observation I did not see him making a fool of himself, at any point. In fact the discussion stretched into 4 different occasions. About the Dillahunty one, I cannot comment on, as I have not yet watched it, so I am curious, at which point exactly did you observe him making a fool of himself?

    • @ashok.vardhan.g
      @ashok.vardhan.g 2 роки тому +3

      @Budda Brotha I agree, hence my careful use of language, and the specific words "interaction" and "discussion" to illustrate their conversation.

    • @galaxytraveler5779
      @galaxytraveler5779 2 роки тому +2

      I watched many debates with Lawrence and religious scholars. Lawrence is fantastic in debates.

    • @sysprogmanadhoc2785
      @sysprogmanadhoc2785 2 роки тому +2

      Peterson is my fav pseudo-intellectual

  • @handyjordan464
    @handyjordan464 3 роки тому +275

    "Tell Me What You Think About This." Or "Correct Me If I'm Wrong." These show Jordan Peterson's humility and openness to criticisms or refinement of ideas. These are some of his great strengths because they are constructive approaches. They should be printed on T-SHIRT.

    • @pretol1
      @pretol1 3 роки тому +12

      These are all defense mechanisms of a person subconsciously understands that he shouldn't be talking to Krauss, because all he has to contribute to the discussion is "put your pants on in the morning"

    • @jimmytimmy3680
      @jimmytimmy3680 3 роки тому +14

      Anyone can say that. He starts with those ideas in mind but when Krauss or Harris asks Peterson a specific rational question, Peterson doesn't accept ir or attempt to understand it. Specifically, regarding Peterson's need to rationalize fiction and fairy tales of religions, in order to prove its worth in the 21st century, which is miceoscopic, to be fair, close to 0. That is stubborness and not humility.

    • @Lulubelle.III.
      @Lulubelle.III. 3 роки тому +4

      These are great things to say throughout a conversation where you shut the hell up and let the other person speak.

    • @cannon7135
      @cannon7135 3 роки тому +12

      @@pretol1 or you just live in a different reality..... you have problems

    • @marcinspace
      @marcinspace 3 роки тому +11

      @@jimmytimmy3680 lol they all dodge each other, have you even been paying attention to their conversations? It is a battle to come to a further understanding of the topic especially when two professionals in different fields are teaching one another different perspectives.

  • @thearbivs
    @thearbivs 3 роки тому +297

    I haven’t seen Jordan Peterson this excited in a while!! Love this conversation

    • @Igor_lvanov
      @Igor_lvanov 3 роки тому +22

      I think, he was excited like a child with John Vervaeke

    • @thomasjones9559
      @thomasjones9559 3 роки тому +3

      I think Nicole Arbour got him pretty excited 😝

    • @unzarjones
      @unzarjones 3 роки тому +17

      Krauss looked happy to talk to someone not in his field who could understand what he was saying.

    • @jamesx2464
      @jamesx2464 3 роки тому +4

      @@thomasjones9559 or he's trying to show his wife that he's just excited for new guests as he was 4 Nicole LOL

    • @MrHEDGEFR0G
      @MrHEDGEFR0G 3 роки тому

      B

  • @theheck5176
    @theheck5176 2 роки тому +1

    I have watched Lawrence Krauss in several documentaries about space but this one with Jordan Peterson is blowing my mind.

  • @LuigiAguilarC
    @LuigiAguilarC 2 роки тому +5

    Amazing to see 2 brilliant human minds having a discussion in the most human and humble way.

    • @jamesgreig5168
      @jamesgreig5168 Рік тому +1

      We are very lucky to experience two such intellects on this accessible forum.

  • @nik4546
    @nik4546 3 роки тому +206

    These kind of discussions are desperatly needed these days.

    • @dharmabeachbum
      @dharmabeachbum 3 роки тому +1

      They’re desperate for sure:)

    • @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
      @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 3 роки тому +1

      Rob Koons vs Graham Oppy on Schmid’s channel.

    • @MassMultiplayer
      @MassMultiplayer 3 роки тому +1

      yea and deforestation monocrop polution of air and water, mass breeding 70 billion animals per year in horrible condition.
      alot of discussion and action has to be done these days.
      but we mostly focus on what we care or like. or affect us directly.
      sounds like we are too much and want too much too.
      but intelectualy yea. this is amazing and its intriguing how far or deep we can understand the world

    • @danteinferno175
      @danteinferno175 3 роки тому +5

      Even though it was 2 hours, it was one of those rare talks that I could have listened even longer.

  • @Comicus8102
    @Comicus8102 3 роки тому +120

    You can tell Krauss was impressed with Jordan’s ability to stay with him on some very technical aspects of physics. Jordan didn’t merely skim Krauss’s book, he actually understood it deeply.

    • @VanHalensApprentice
      @VanHalensApprentice 3 роки тому +16

      I mean he was tested to have an iq of 150. No surprise there. His mental acuity, especially at the age that he’s at and the drastic recovery he just had to undertake, never ceases to flabbergast me.

    • @danielm5161
      @danielm5161 3 роки тому +4

      Max Tegmark would be a great person in dialog with Jordan.

    • @_BirdOfGoodOmen
      @_BirdOfGoodOmen 3 роки тому +7

      @@phasespace4700 cool

    • @VanHalensApprentice
      @VanHalensApprentice 3 роки тому +5

      @@phasespace4700 I can totally understand the disdain if you look at it from a purely reductionist and materialistic perspective. Honestly he’s just as much a romantic as he is an intellectual so there’s that as well. Would you mind telling me which idea in particular you disagree with so that we can discuss?

    • @mahehahee
      @mahehahee 3 роки тому

      Lol

  • @gamEnjoyLP
    @gamEnjoyLP 2 роки тому +35

    Physic’s and psychology, two of the most fascinating topics! Really gives you a sense of the complexity and beauty of life.

  • @donnafoster5215
    @donnafoster5215 Рік тому +1

    Dr. Peterson’s honest attempt to understand something new is a wonderful model for engaging others. He doesn’t contend, but finds issues where he can get clarity on the topic.

  • @charlesrump5771
    @charlesrump5771 3 роки тому +272

    Whenever Krauss says "literally nothing", he means something.

    • @CRHE
      @CRHE 3 роки тому +75

      Yeah, he’s been corrected by philosophers on this time and again, but he’s too full of himself to listen.

    • @HolyKhaaaaan
      @HolyKhaaaaan 3 роки тому +19

      It means something that empirically is nothing. But just because it cannot be measured does not mean it does not exist.

    • @glynsmith60
      @glynsmith60 3 роки тому +6

      To any JP fans...Im looking for an accomplished singer/acoustic guitar player with a folk/soft rock style to cover a fully completed song dedicated to Jordans 12 Rules books and philosophies.If you are interested and think you might be able to help let me know, and we can arrange contact! Thanks,

    • @bryanfoster2651
      @bryanfoster2651 3 роки тому +11

      @@CRHE LOL This is not a question that philosophers can help with

    • @GeroG3N
      @GeroG3N 3 роки тому +31

      @@bryanfoster2651 Yes, it is. It's literally semantics.

  • @BandasPalette
    @BandasPalette 3 роки тому +96

    Wow, the more I learn the more I know I will forever be a student of life.
    Great conversation!

    • @AntiProtonBoy
      @AntiProtonBoy 2 роки тому +2

      That's a good thing. This means there is always something new and interesting to learn about the world.

    • @peaceislam1204
      @peaceislam1204 2 роки тому +1

      .. but the question is, would it be beneficial to you..

    • @JesusNOTreLIEgion
      @JesusNOTreLIEgion 2 роки тому +2

      continue your education as a student by listening to an opposing view provided by Dr. Stephen C Meyer. Just put his name into UA-cam search and watch/listen with an open mind.
      with love,
      former atheist who grew up Catholic that now believes in the historical and spiritual accuracy of the Bible.

    • @yumyum723
      @yumyum723 Рік тому

      @@peaceislam1204 it certainly isn't doing Islam any favours since tye Quran I'd riddled with scientific fallacies

  • @rictormantas
    @rictormantas Рік тому +9

    I hope that these two brilliant minds come together more. This is one of the best learning experiences I’ve ever had

    • @jupitermoongauge4055
      @jupitermoongauge4055 Рік тому

      Krause is certainly intelligent. Peterson is just a fascist con artist

  • @amygolds2435
    @amygolds2435 2 роки тому +1

    I love listening to highly intelligent people speak. Their back and forth makes me feel so dumb and yet here I am learning every time I listen to JP ❤️

  • @simonnevanpaesschen8335
    @simonnevanpaesschen8335 3 роки тому +14

    I admire Jordan Peterson more and more with every podcast .
    If politicians would be able to debate in such a way , life would be so much better
    anywhere in the world.
    I will need to listen a few more times to really grasp it, but what a great source of knowledge and wisdom in these 2 minds .
    I'm in awe .

    • @groundedtruth1358
      @groundedtruth1358 3 роки тому

      That's because you're watching people embody the archetype and it strikes you as admirable. You know from somewhere that acting like that towards each other, and if more people did that, is our best bet in not only surviving but in making the time that we have here in our "quantum bubble of experience," good and aiming at better. Why does that manifest as meaningful to you? that's a deep question - so much fun!

  • @Lakoda26
    @Lakoda26 3 роки тому +150

    "How to fail effectively" Has me up out of my chair. So darn important.

    • @clemsonalum98
      @clemsonalum98 3 роки тому +7

      What’s fail? I always get a ribbon.

    • @bitcoinbelle
      @bitcoinbelle 3 роки тому

      I am almost at "must" wear reading glasses so read "fall" and thought "That's one way."

    • @hollismallory2757
      @hollismallory2757 3 роки тому

      Hell yeah

    • @HolographicSweater
      @HolographicSweater 3 роки тому +3

      I think learning a martial art, or surfboarding is a good way to build this skill!

    • @joev.8543
      @joev.8543 3 роки тому

      More than half of proficiency in many activities, such as skateboarding for example, are about learning how to fall skillfully.

  • @camrobinson118
    @camrobinson118 2 роки тому +12

    As an atheist I have been troubled by Krauss' sometimes shrill rhetoric and out of hand dismissal of the value of religion, and equally, I have been perplexed by Peterson's confidence in the merit of religion's 'metaphorical substrate.' Their discussion, particularly at the end of the podcast, went a long way towards assuaging my concerns regarding their respective positions; particularly their dialectic has for me, put a more humane face on Lawrence Krauss' world view and given me a greater insight as to Jordan Peterson's somewhat vague endorsement of religion.
    For me, this conversation has elevated both their individual views of science and religion, and my esteem for their intellectual honesty.

    • @missnellaful
      @missnellaful 2 роки тому +1

      Very astute observervation. You pointed out a fascinating part that many may not pick up, thank you!

  • @renupathak4442
    @renupathak4442 Рік тому

    Love Lawrence Krauss' s enthusiasm, articulation, abundant knowledge, and, though himself, a brilliant man how simply he explains the complex. Thank you Dr Jordan for your pertinent questions. I marvel at your interest

  • @Alex-hu5eg
    @Alex-hu5eg 3 роки тому +279

    Schopenhauer's Law of Entropy: If you put a spoonful of wine in a barrel full of sewage, you get sewage. If you put a spoonful of sewage in a barrel full of wine, you get sewage.

    • @firestorm8260
      @firestorm8260 3 роки тому +37

      So glad the latter results in sewage and not wine.

    • @earthjin2000
      @earthjin2000 3 роки тому +21

      I think we all know someone that will drink the wine with a spoonful of sewage in it and get so drunk they will hit you over the head with barrel of sewage with a spoonful of wine in it.

    • @whitealaskan
      @whitealaskan 3 роки тому +32

      Not sure about that. The FDA allows some strange stuff in our food.

    • @roddydykes7053
      @roddydykes7053 3 роки тому +2

      @@whitealaskan hair and sawdust are okay

    • @tylerhill9510
      @tylerhill9510 3 роки тому +2

      Is this quote in the world as will as representation or? You should also look into the ideas of shrodinger and plank?

  • @edmundas04
    @edmundas04 3 роки тому +49

    The only problem with this podcast is that it’s too short

    • @fatality9072
      @fatality9072 3 роки тому +1

      We are so spoiled. We get to peek into an intellectual conversation with 2 legends for 2 hours and we still feel unquenched !

    • @jamescollier3
      @jamescollier3 2 роки тому

      lol. omg this was 2 brilliant PhD's at a high level in two complex subjects at once lol

  • @argyriosvlastos321
    @argyriosvlastos321 2 роки тому +50

    Listened to this again, and gained so much more the second time around. A study of physics and a basic understanding of these concepts should be central to all of us, even those not technically trained!

    • @daviddeida
      @daviddeida 2 роки тому

      Why?

    • @johnirvine9942
      @johnirvine9942 2 роки тому +6

      @@daviddeida It allows you to perceive things in a manner that is not entirely subjective. Once understanding these concepts you can conceive the world in such a way that is far greater than your individual existence.

    • @lowellneese549
      @lowellneese549 2 роки тому +2

      Big bang is not real

    • @johnirvine9942
      @johnirvine9942 2 роки тому

      @@lowellneese549 How do you know?

    • @sherryjohnson3804
      @sherryjohnson3804 2 роки тому

      I have to admit this one Was a little too much to grasp

  • @hemantdaulta1
    @hemantdaulta1 2 роки тому +6

    2 of my favorite public intellectuals, so excited to start this podcast! Such a delight.

  • @robertlee918
    @robertlee918 3 роки тому +26

    I've felt so profoundly lonely all my life until now. Thank you Dr. Jordan Peterson and Lawrence Krauss!

    • @microapple97
      @microapple97 3 роки тому +11

      You know what I want? A better way to connect with people who are watching the same UA-cam videos, because I've struggled with profound loneliness too.

    • @theohuioiesin6519
      @theohuioiesin6519 2 роки тому +3

      Just take the risk and exchange email addresses.
      I won’t spam you.

  • @ryanballantyne1811
    @ryanballantyne1811 3 роки тому +183

    What would you like to talk about?
    Peterson: “Yes.”
    Krauss: “Alright, I’m game.”

    • @johnpepin5373
      @johnpepin5373 3 роки тому

      I thought it interesting that Krause said the ground state of the electron is not zero because the universe is not infinite... suggesting a finite universe.
      I also found it interesting when he said someday other galaxies will be out of sight, because the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light... but I thought nothing could go faster than the speed of light. Which is universal in all frames of reference.

    • @essaytv9527
      @essaytv9527 3 роки тому +2

      @@johnpepin5373 I'm no physicist, but i think the explanation to that was SPACE ITSELF is expanding, and so is not bound by the speed of light.

    • @johnpepin5373
      @johnpepin5373 3 роки тому

      @@essaytv9527 Maybe.

  • @PurpleChevron
    @PurpleChevron Рік тому +3

    Huge fan of both of these gentlemen. I found the discussion enormously productive and cordial.

  • @holysquire8989
    @holysquire8989 2 роки тому

    What unites these two is their passion and joy for ideas and this joy suffuses the listener.

  • @harrypalmer3481
    @harrypalmer3481 3 роки тому +36

    The older I get the less surprised about people I become, with increasing sadness. I'm so pleased at being surprised by how well this discussion went, thank you Gentlemen!

  • @dnelson5638
    @dnelson5638 3 роки тому +46

    Now we need an interview with Stephen Meyer to get the metaphysical view on cosmology and his book Return of the God Hypthesis

  • @tartanbessy436
    @tartanbessy436 2 роки тому +16

    Thank you both 💛 this is helping me understand my anxiety.
    Being Autistic with ADHD and not being diagnosed with either until my late 30s and into my 40s, life has been in equal measure amazing and awful.
    My brain doesn't have filters so my brain never shuts up and does not filter out unnecessary thoughts.

    • @craigfowler7098
      @craigfowler7098 2 роки тому +1

      Try meditation

    • @tartanbessy436
      @tartanbessy436 2 роки тому

      @@craigfowler7098 have done since i was a teen ☺

    • @craigfowler7098
      @craigfowler7098 2 роки тому +1

      @@tartanbessy436 Great to hear that. I would recommend the Linden method

    • @babsharris6724
      @babsharris6724 Рік тому

      Homeopathics have a pill to stop thar & shut your mind up its Coffee Cruda & I've used it for years. It takes about 3 days .

  • @jamesgreig5168
    @jamesgreig5168 Рік тому

    Always a pleasure to watch Jordan Peterson interviews.
    I must say, Lawrence is far more comfortable in this topic then his lecture on climate. One field he is an expert, the other, climatology, he tried to be an expert.

  • @fisch5220
    @fisch5220 3 роки тому +10

    These conversations are more packed with information than just about every school class I’ve ever participated in. Geez what a time to be alive!

    • @jamesgreig5168
      @jamesgreig5168 Рік тому

      I was just thinking that. This 2 hours had more information than 1 year of my university course.

  • @swordarmstudios6052
    @swordarmstudios6052 3 роки тому +40

    Jordan asks good thoughtful questions. He's a good interviewer for scientists.

    • @pretol1
      @pretol1 3 роки тому +4

      It's a nice thing to do when you have a "bring your child to work day", but it's not something scientists enjoy on a regular basis.

    • @electricpigs
      @electricpigs 3 роки тому +2

      agreed

    • @Arjun-eb1yc
      @Arjun-eb1yc 3 роки тому +2

      He seems to know enough physics to ask good questions and make it interesting.

    • @parmachine470
      @parmachine470 3 роки тому +2

      Obviously, you are not in a position to define what a good question is.

    • @A_M_Bobb
      @A_M_Bobb 3 роки тому +1

      No he isn't. He tries desperately to support his original narrative-driven beliefs.

  • @jbauman1111
    @jbauman1111 2 роки тому +1

    This is beautiful, in multiple ways. Thank you Dr. Krauss and Dr. Peterson.

  • @cindysmalling4226
    @cindysmalling4226 2 роки тому +9

    This is so amazing!!! Thank you for this conversation! It’s powerful, enlightening and encouraging. “We are all religious. “We all want to believe.”

    • @maxodgaard1335
      @maxodgaard1335 2 роки тому

      Not me, the world "as is", holds more than enough wonders.....

    • @MrLeolesh
      @MrLeolesh 2 роки тому +1

      @@maxodgaard1335 how do you know it exists, or rather how do you know what is a wonder in the first place? You seem to treat religion as a primitive science. Needless to say, you couldn't be more wrong.

    • @maxodgaard1335
      @maxodgaard1335 2 роки тому +1

      @Leo Tsisin Religion and science mix as oil and water.... Religion no matter which, is a primitive way to try to comprehend the world.

    • @MrLeolesh
      @MrLeolesh 2 роки тому

      @@maxodgaard1335 it is not, nor is science. Thanks for demonstrating that you're utterly clueless as to the philosophy of both.

    • @maxodgaard1335
      @maxodgaard1335 2 роки тому

      @Leo Tsisin Science makes you and me communicate now here on this platform on a server in the real natural world..... Religion will keep you dumb and ignorant. It will add nothing but fictional absurdities to human kind until enlightenment finally finishes it off....Sorry but it is what it is..... 🤷 what is even worse is that you got brainwashed as a child and now the delusion is so strongly built in you that you are blinded/cut off from reality..... You have the perspective of a child....

  • @jomcduff675
    @jomcduff675 3 роки тому +7

    Dear Dr. P., Each time I find a new upload here, my mood lifts a great deal. So gratifying to listen, learn--and engage again. Thank you!

  • @chewie8910
    @chewie8910 3 роки тому +38

    This is awesome. When I was 14 or so, more of a church boy, I watched a couple of debates with Kraus and fundamentalists, and I disliked him because of my indoctrination I felt attacked and I was close-minded. Since then I haven't seen anything of him. I saw him in the thumbnail and remembered him so I was curious. I love this guy's mind and attitude, I have a lot of admiration. And I'm feeling pretty good about myself because this means I've grown into a more open minded person myself.

    • @phineasrathbone6230
      @phineasrathbone6230 3 роки тому +3

      If only he didn't visit Jeffery Epstein's island I might still have some respect for him

    • @chewie8910
      @chewie8910 3 роки тому +7

      @Melissa Oestreich I'm more of an agnostic. I believe there is a god, but I know I can't prove it rationally, and I understand that I don't know the meaning of life, and I embrace the mystery of life. (even though I believe there is a meaning that I discover little by little every day if I'm on the right path)

    • @chrisc7265
      @chrisc7265 3 роки тому +6

      I was raised secular and find atheist mode Kraus to be missing the point entirely. I dismissed him based on some other recent convos, though I agree this one is pretty good.

    • @apracity7672
      @apracity7672 3 роки тому +1

      You dont have to prove it rationally, its already been done through many logically deductive arguments with sound premises. For instance the argument from contingency, the cosmological argument, etc

    • @zzzap5425
      @zzzap5425 3 роки тому +1

      @@apracity7672 isn't that a method of rationalisation? Mind my lack of understanding in your statement. Just a question. Are you saying that due to his presumably right deductive arguments there is no need for rationalisation becuase its already done by the arguments? Again, i have not fully grasped these concerpts.🤔

  • @jamesharris184
    @jamesharris184 2 роки тому

    How am I supposed to watch from the beginning to now in one sitting... Every time I start the rewatch it ocurrs to me "now" isn't what it was yesterday, and this realization is compounded by difficultiea I am having with my time machine but time waites for no one and I won't wait for me, or so admonished Mick Jagger Once Upon a Time. Thanks for bringing this wonderful guest into my event horizon. I am looking forward to his books!!

  • @karensilver8853
    @karensilver8853 2 роки тому +4

    This is so fascinating. It's awesome to hear Krauss and Peterson working out cosmological issues. The two of them are at the top of their game.

  • @rossalthor
    @rossalthor 3 роки тому +32

    Lawrence Krauss is an absolute legend. I remember this man as a frequent expert commentator on Discovery and History channel shows promoting science long before youtube even existed.

    • @lightworker4512
      @lightworker4512 3 роки тому +3

      @Elder D Castañeda perhaps he is a flawed human being but I respect his knowledge in physics. People that point out flaws in others have their own deep seated flaws. We are all here to learn and evolve. None of us are perfect.

    • @lightworker4512
      @lightworker4512 3 роки тому +4

      @Elder D Castañeda If Lawrence teaches Ethics, I will not listen. For physics, I enjoy learning from him.

    • @lightworker4512
      @lightworker4512 3 роки тому

      @@MeMe-qc6ow how did universe begin then?

    • @wheelInmotion430
      @wheelInmotion430 3 роки тому +2

      @@MeMe-qc6ow actually guys like Krauss are trying to get away from the Big Bang because it actually helps prove the existence of God creating a beginning point, that ha since expanded. They like the multiverse idea or throwing around terms like “dark matter” or infinite emptiness.

    • @wubdubb3374
      @wubdubb3374 3 роки тому

      too sad, they've wasted their lives on nonsense lol. they cant comprehend reality.

  • @marktullis6484
    @marktullis6484 3 роки тому +59

    I have a couple of degrees, a little understanding of science and physics, but seriously, I know nothing. This may be the most interesting discussion I have ever had the privilege to listen in to...

    • @parmachine470
      @parmachine470 3 роки тому +7

      were your degrees in nonsense and bull shit?

    • @hughjanus7176
      @hughjanus7176 3 роки тому +13

      @@parmachine470 The internet surely isn't a kind place :P

    • @joshtaylor8617
      @joshtaylor8617 3 роки тому +6

      Par Machine UA-cam scholar right here

    • @lucamatteobarbieri2493
      @lucamatteobarbieri2493 3 роки тому +7

      @@hughjanus7176 Don't feed the trolls, just ignore them ;)

    • @alanjohnson9336
      @alanjohnson9336 3 роки тому +1

      Saying you know nothing is a sign of your intelligence

  • @brendabarbosa5923
    @brendabarbosa5923 2 роки тому +8

    I had never heard of Dr Krauss before and after hearing this discussion, I’m obsessed! I want to read all his books and listen to his ideas. He’s so easy to understand and follow, despite the ideas and discoveries being so complex. Plus, he just seems like a nice guy. He and Jordan together are such a good combination for interesting and provocative discussion. Thank you for doing this and enriching my understanding of the Universe. I could listen to them talk for 2 weeks straight!! 😝

    • @oghaki5097
      @oghaki5097 2 роки тому +1

      Look a little further into this guy, he is pretty awful, surprised Jordan had him on.

    • @scottyhugefellow1447
      @scottyhugefellow1447 2 роки тому +1

      Glad you like listening to him theres heaps of content out there. He converses well with Dawkins, I recommend their talk on titled something from nothing and his talks on the Issac Asimov memorial debates

    • @jamesgreig5168
      @jamesgreig5168 Рік тому

      Great physicist, but his attempt on Global warming was less than startling.

  • @oliviajames8630
    @oliviajames8630 Рік тому +2

    I am currently reading "1001 Atheist & Agnostic Quotes and Proverbs to Live By" Lawrence M. Krauss.
    And is AMAZING !!! BLEW MY MIND !!!

  • @meinking22
    @meinking22 3 роки тому +23

    My initial thought during the discussion was that Dr. Peterson was trying to identify the precise cosmological moment at which chaos is first injected into the universe, but then the 1:25:00 point kicked in and we're talking about the religious impulse, scientific method, meaning, physics and a potential proto-framework for the Woke psychology. Fantastic stuff from both participants! Thank You

    • @midnightwatchman1
      @midnightwatchman1 3 роки тому

      your comment saves me from switching off. it is the same thing he speaks about all the time at all this conferences does not say anything particularly interesting and giving opinion on topics that was not asked

    • @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
      @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 3 роки тому +1

      No serious engagement with any of the best philosophers of religion.

    • @PrivateSi
      @PrivateSi 3 роки тому +1

      I thought Peterson was mostly assessing Crazy Krauss's lefty liberal delusional, lofty, mindset and attitudes.. False humility that disrespects humanity mixed with conceited arrogance for himself and Science. Krauss is a proper nutter.

    • @midnightwatchman1
      @midnightwatchman1 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns Krauss clueless and even worse he boasts about his ignorance. basically, if he does not know anything about it is not worth knowning. Philosophy and religion are useless in his worldview because he cannot test it. then comes up with his own framework which is equally untestable for finding purpose out of purposelessness

    • @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns
      @TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 3 роки тому

      @@midnightwatchman1 I agree, although I’d qualify your use of “test” by adding the word “scientifically.” I think to an extent one can “test” the claims of natural theology with reason a la Josh Rasmussen, Ed Feser, David Bentley Hart, Rob Koons, etc

  • @ruizhang2452
    @ruizhang2452 3 роки тому +123

    Love that quick little sympathetic smile on Peterson's face when Dr Krauss said his point couldn't get across in OxfordUnion debate because "they are all woke". 😁

    • @fs5775
      @fs5775 3 роки тому +4

      more like a wry smile, it was fun.. ;)

    • @henrinaths1
      @henrinaths1 3 роки тому +1

      Lol ...the festering sewer pit of mind controlling.
      (Apparently lightning is the cure.)

    • @slorang414
      @slorang414 3 роки тому +2

      timestamp?

    • @ruizhang2452
      @ruizhang2452 3 роки тому +5

      Sam Lorang 1:30:30

    • @michaelparsons3007
      @michaelparsons3007 2 роки тому +2

      People like Krauss are the ones that made the way for the woke with all their meaningless BS. Krauss is such an idiot he doesn’t realize that without meaning you can’t compete evolutionarily. He’s one of the stupidest smart people I’ve ever heard.

  • @Remnants100
    @Remnants100 Рік тому

    I am in agreement with many of the comments here. This is without doubt one of the most interesting discussions ever posted on UA-cam.
    Two great minds who are both able to articulate their particular views whilst keeping it respectful.

  • @TheBepax
    @TheBepax 2 роки тому

    Another insightful discussion. Dr. Krauss explains science in a way that is real. It is pursuit of what is. reality. All the things we have learned on the way encourage us to continue. He has great faith.

  • @nelsonang
    @nelsonang 3 роки тому +20

    wow... when there’s humility, there’s beauty! extraordinary men... thank you!

  • @graemejack9040
    @graemejack9040 3 роки тому +100

    Fascinating conversation. I love watching Lawrence talk because he's always so energetic and enthusiastic. It was awesome to see Jordan matching that enthusiasm throughout the discussion.

    • @mcrobsaccount
      @mcrobsaccount 2 роки тому +4

      hes antisocial and is disinterested by any ideas other than his own, never expanded on any points peterson made. Typical scientist bore imo.

    • @ianwinslett5013
      @ianwinslett5013 2 роки тому +2

      He talks about so many things and says nothing.

    • @geoffreyferguson1643
      @geoffreyferguson1643 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah I find it attractive to my brain to listen to people who are passionate about what they are aware of.

    • @ianwinslett5013
      @ianwinslett5013 2 роки тому +2

      @@yamyoemerson2095 The problem is that science has turned into a religion of its own.

    • @mcrobsaccount
      @mcrobsaccount 2 роки тому

      @@yamyoemerson2095 can you explain to me
      the science that says there's more than two genders. Because that's the claim science is making today, is that a hypotheseis you're willing to subscribe to? Science has become scientism

  • @nirolama1183
    @nirolama1183 2 роки тому +5

    I'm infinitely glad I'm living at this time in history, and I had the chance to watch this mind blowing discussion!

  • @JDSCT
    @JDSCT 2 роки тому +4

    This is easily one of the best long form discussions I've watched in a long time. Really looking forward to their next meeting.

  • @byjakeburgess
    @byjakeburgess 3 роки тому +152

    never thought i'd see this crossover but i'm so glad it exists!

    • @szotakandrei
      @szotakandrei 3 роки тому +7

      Imagine Jordan and Neil Degrasse Tyson

    • @byjakeburgess
      @byjakeburgess 3 роки тому +2

      @@szotakandrei in a perfect world

    • @sandwich675
      @sandwich675 3 роки тому +4

      @@szotakandrei nah

    • @MorrisonEnterprise
      @MorrisonEnterprise 3 роки тому +2

      Krauss is bauss

    • @stevepickford3004
      @stevepickford3004 3 роки тому

      Shame Krauss couldn't listen for 2 seconds and actually have a conversation. It's sad that every public scientist seems to lack basic social skills.

  • @chrisd997
    @chrisd997 3 роки тому +35

    I like dr Peterson trying to understand and most importantly how hungry he is to learn more about quantum physics. respect Sir ✊

    • @multiquantumwell
      @multiquantumwell 2 роки тому +1

      In fact he fears the truth that there's no god. He Is worried for loosing his metaphoric substrate of his ethos ☝️😂

    • @avatar2833
      @avatar2833 2 роки тому

      @@multiquantumwell I love Dr. Peterson, but he did not dare make those wishy-washy religious sophistry he usually employs in his pseudoscientific apologetics for Christianity. When it comes to psychology, and psychiatry, he is a truly gifted doctor and writer (also his cultural and ideological critique of modern culture).

  • @umityayla5051
    @umityayla5051 3 роки тому +3

    I am a fan of Dr.Krauss thank you for hosting him.

    • @briantrombley3115
      @briantrombley3115 Рік тому

      Did you know he went to Epstein Island WAY more than once?

  • @scarlettardis2018
    @scarlettardis2018 2 роки тому +6

    How did I miss this! This is going to be an excellent conversation!!!!

  • @nicholaseaves2591
    @nicholaseaves2591 3 роки тому +39

    I love how many times i hear Peterson elaborate on one of Krauss's thoughts and you see this look of amazement, surprise and joy wash across his face as he agrees with what Peterson says

    • @incognitomcde1360
      @incognitomcde1360 3 роки тому +9

      I think it is beyond expectation for someone like him to not only have the interviewer comprehend what you are saying but then follow up with relevant, interesting questions (outside of his colleagues, mean). It’s probably a breath of fresh air to take the training wheels off in conversation and to have the other person not get that glazed look in their eyes.

    • @christopher227n
      @christopher227n 3 роки тому +3

      @@incognitomcde1360 100% I get similar satisfaction, although I’m listening and not engaging in the conversation.

  • @treyjenkins5672
    @treyjenkins5672 3 роки тому +78

    “I’m tempted to take it in that direction, but I think I’m going to continue to torture you about the structure of the universe.” Couldn’t have said it better myself JP.

    • @brockmann4815
      @brockmann4815 3 роки тому

      Well it seems like the temptation got to strong during the end ^^

    • @Choscura
      @Choscura 3 роки тому +3

      I sort of like seeing the last honest priest of the Roman Empire bouncing around everybody else's temples and learning how everybody has the same 'gods'

    • @jjroseknows777
      @jjroseknows777 3 роки тому

      Maybe one of you can tell me what WAS the direction that he was tempted to take it into? Maybe you can tell me what minute... I'd like to check out that point in time.

    • @brockmann4815
      @brockmann4815 3 роки тому

      @@jjroseknows777 If I remember right, it was the realm of meaning and psychology, but he explicitly wanted to talk about science.

  • @yakkayakka360
    @yakkayakka360 2 роки тому

    The parallels between physics and psychology at this level are astounding, but also perfectly logical.

  • @benkeszabo
    @benkeszabo 2 роки тому

    Imagine you could go so far out of your field of expertise, and have such a deep conversation. Amazed.

  • @alexisidro
    @alexisidro 3 роки тому +6

    Yes! Two magnificent leaders of two amazing fields collide; one explaining why and how behind human behavior (psychology), and the other one explaining why and how behind nature (physics). Why I love both! 🔥

  • @treyjenkins5672
    @treyjenkins5672 3 роки тому +127

    Haven’t heard from Lawrence Krause since the Richard Dawkins era. Should be a good one.

    • @nimamz73
      @nimamz73 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly

    • @stormhawk31
      @stormhawk31 3 роки тому +23

      After William Lane Craig destroyed him in a debate, he kind of went away quietly.

    • @MrSidney9
      @MrSidney9 3 роки тому +11

      @@zz4484 me too .😂 I see what you did there

    • @jwscheuerman
      @jwscheuerman 3 роки тому +13

      @@stormhawk31 WLC is a formidable debater, in that he makes very effective use of rhetorical devices which can be hard to spot on the fly. However, his arguments are weak.

    • @treyjenkins5672
      @treyjenkins5672 3 роки тому +18

      @@stormhawk31 William Lane Craig lost that debate😂😂

  • @ashok.vardhan.g
    @ashok.vardhan.g 2 роки тому +1

    The scientific quest itself, as Krauss and Peterson outlay in their interaction, in itself is the archetypical hero's journey. There's something to wonder about, and why we human beings are fundamentally driven in that manner.

  • @juang.garcia8454
    @juang.garcia8454 2 роки тому +2

    AWESOME CONVERSATION!! I ENJOYED THIS ONE SO MUCH!!

  • @SolvingTheMoneyProblem
    @SolvingTheMoneyProblem 3 роки тому +558

    Great conversation. Looking forward to part two on Krauss’s podcast.

    • @SusanWojcickiDidntEarnHerJob
      @SusanWojcickiDidntEarnHerJob 3 роки тому +15

      Krauss is a pea dough file and took Epstein's money and defended him.

    • @MorrisonEnterprise
      @MorrisonEnterprise 3 роки тому +19

      If you're new, welcome. If you're not, welcome back.

    • @meanwhileinsooke
      @meanwhileinsooke 3 роки тому +5

      He almost died of drug addiction and covid what a fucking hypocrite

    • @extraspecialk3244
      @extraspecialk3244 3 роки тому +28

      @@meanwhileinsooke He took a medication that his doctor prescribed him, then kicked it when he realized how bad it was. He never claimed COVID wasn't a serious illness. What hypocrisy are you referring too?

    • @danteinferno175
      @danteinferno175 3 роки тому +18

      Totally underestimated podcast. Absolutely fascinating.
      And in previous podcasts sometimes I would feel like Peterson was "interrupting" his guest but in this podcast his questions were startlingly insightful and his enthusiasm only potentiated the responses of his guest.
      Anyone reading the comments here, watch the whole podcast! Fascinating!

  • @chubzero7342
    @chubzero7342 3 роки тому +15

    JP is back baby! So good to see him recovering!!

  • @oyisaonl7855
    @oyisaonl7855 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder how these men think, it's just incredible how they think and how they articulate their thoughts. Thank you for the content Dr Jordan Peterson.

  • @neitherland7321
    @neitherland7321 2 роки тому

    Fascinating.. how much education you get from this. Thank you Jordan and Lawrence!

  • @jonafaria
    @jonafaria 3 роки тому +76

    “You could say, ‘What good is a Beethoven symphony across the span of a trillion years?’ Well, none, but what good is posing that question?” -JBP

    • @sohibmohamed9548
      @sohibmohamed9548 3 роки тому +2

      @Pinned by Jordan B Peterson really?? who's gonna fall for this?

    • @MarmaladeSally
      @MarmaladeSally 3 роки тому

      Peterson is an idiot and nothing he says is nearly as profound as he makes it seem.

    • @ekremdincel1505
      @ekremdincel1505 3 роки тому +4

      @@MarmaladeSally I don't think whether something is profound or not is absolute so I don't get your point.

    • @jackfiercetree5205
      @jackfiercetree5205 2 роки тому +5

      @@MarmaladeSally while things he says may not be quite as profound as he implies, that does not automatically lead to, he's an idiot. Also, the profundity of most prose will be found inside the reader... which may sound pretentious, and I guarantee you Krauss can derive much more profound implication from E^2=m^2 × c^4 than you could ever imagine...

    • @waltermh111
      @waltermh111 2 роки тому +5

      @@sohibmohamed9548 The point is valid though and JBP has discussed things like this before, that there are things science simply cant answer. That are outside of its purpose and ability.
      So if you think science must be able to prove everything or it isnt worthy of consideration, then he has a point.
      Its like if science cant recreate or understand love perfectly, does that mean it isnt real or meaningful?
      You just disagree with the point, but it doesnt make him an idiot anymore than it makes you an idiot.

  • @josephmoya9929
    @josephmoya9929 3 роки тому +6

    The excitement in Krauss's face. I really enjoyed this!

  • @varuna6089
    @varuna6089 2 роки тому

    So much intellect between these two wonderful men. So much to learn.

  • @joshuaswick
    @joshuaswick 2 роки тому +1

    The difference between someone that appreciates first principles and someone who doesn't. I applaud Lawrence Krauss on his patience here.

  • @SirEebRhawl
    @SirEebRhawl 3 роки тому +147

    I’m really impressed by this conversation. I didn’t think those two would be a good pair.

    • @josemaldonarico
      @josemaldonarico 3 роки тому +4

      Curious people usually are

    • @paulfrederick1568
      @paulfrederick1568 3 роки тому +12

      When Peterson wants to learn something, he shuts up and listens.

    • @PoetlaureateNFDL
      @PoetlaureateNFDL 3 роки тому

      I agree. Was thinking the same thing!

    • @JackT13
      @JackT13 3 роки тому +5

      At the risk of sounding like a dick, I think you’re missing the word ‘think’ in this comment.

    • @chris5559
      @chris5559 3 роки тому +1

      Just an amazing thing when super smart people get together.

  • @Killsringman
    @Killsringman 3 роки тому +80

    Huge fan of both gentlemen on this episode, Jordan's proclivity to mass produce so many intriguing podcast talks one after another amazes me, and I chuckled with joy and interest of Lawrence's huge (and swift!)enthusiasm of explaining the laws of physics in here, which is of course remarkable. Thank you both so much for having enriched my life as well as many others!

    • @BlockchainGhost
      @BlockchainGhost 3 роки тому +1

      Ditto! Aside the remarkable content & energy of the podast, it's truly enjoyable to witness how these two great minds enjoy talking to each other.

    • @jasonmckay8793
      @jasonmckay8793 3 роки тому +1

      blow some more smoke up asses mate lol

    • @ArtistVisuals
      @ArtistVisuals 3 роки тому

      @@jasonmckay8793 England lost and thats ok

  • @kubrickenigma7977
    @kubrickenigma7977 2 роки тому

    It's conversations like this that UA-cam more of a global blessing than otherwise.

  • @ronarkom1611
    @ronarkom1611 2 роки тому +15

    Wow, both of my intellectual heroes in one podcast! You guys should do public speaking events.

  • @noenken
    @noenken 3 роки тому +17

    This was great, can't wait for the second meeting of these two.

  • @copperrod5122
    @copperrod5122 3 роки тому +11

    Looking great Dr. Peterson!
    Thank you for your amazing content 😎

  • @VirgoBirrane
    @VirgoBirrane 2 роки тому +4

    Wow...I never really gave Krauss a chance before this interview, he's brilliant.
    Great interview by Peterson, thank you 👏👏👏

  • @danielasplund825
    @danielasplund825 2 роки тому

    Both of the gentlemen are providing a good case that living is actually based on a sense of comfortable outcome. When feeling okey you take it for granted but it's the only thing that you want when feeling bad. The substance of that hope is not the most essential but it is that there is a hope instead of hopelessness.

  • @CanWeGetDeep
    @CanWeGetDeep 3 роки тому +9

    I’ve wished for this exact podcast for a few years now. THANK YOU

    • @CanWeGetDeep
      @CanWeGetDeep Рік тому

      @Phil Stevens thank you Phil Stevens

  • @B-Nice
    @B-Nice 3 роки тому +6

    This was amazing!! Looking forward to hearing them together on the Origins Podcast!!

  • @MarkosEvans
    @MarkosEvans 2 роки тому

    Wow! I love Jordan Peterson. Such a great leader. Thank you. :)

  • @kevinjolley1924
    @kevinjolley1924 2 роки тому

    To have an intelligent conversation with Krauss in his zone, is VERY impressive! JP is super intelligent. JP was channeling Dr Tyson!

  • @mrdavinci4178
    @mrdavinci4178 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you Mr Peterson! You do understand the impact you make and I just wanted to say I truly appreciate what you do. Looking great

  • @DeeFrancisPadamadan
    @DeeFrancisPadamadan 3 роки тому +9

    This should be interesting 🧐 I look forward to the next couple of hours! Thanks Jordan! I am going to get withdrawal symptoms if I don’t listen to you for more than a week!!

  • @gabriel_mf
    @gabriel_mf 2 роки тому +5

    What an amazing conversation. I was so intrigued by their discussion about spirituality. I think we all would benefit from a continuation of that debate. Looking foward for their next encounter.

  • @Jason-ln7ot
    @Jason-ln7ot 2 роки тому +1

    Enjoyable conversation. I appreciate you Mr. Peterson . The world needed you. Its fact to me that God and what he is is the beginning of the universe. Scientifically it is the only way possible. Your guest is corret in some part but not about God and the Beginning.