Robert Sapolsky: The Illusion of Free Will

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @Ryan-on5on
    @Ryan-on5on Рік тому +111

    Lawrence,
    I am thrilled to see Professor Sapolsky as a guest on your podcast. Like so many, I first became aware of Sapolsky through his excellent online Stanford lecture series on Psychobiology. At first watch, I was hopelessly hooked by his astoundingly wide breadth of knowledge, charming wit, inspiring humility, and clear way of communicating quite difficult concepts. These lectures made me better aware of the biological underpinnings of all human behavior and how environment and neurobiology interact to influence one's psychological profile. Further, they made me more understanding, less judgmental, and even slightly empathetic of those highly damaged persons who have caused me some harm in life. For this, I owe the great Professor an immeasurable deal of gratitude.
    Glad you had the opportunity to talk for so long with one of the greatest and most fascinating intellects of our time! A conversation such as this could've gone on for two hours more, and I would've been glued to the screen for its entirety all the same
    Regards,
    Ryan

    • @bobwoww8384
      @bobwoww8384 Рік тому +4

      I couldn’t agree more. You took the words right out of my mouth, in much better form I must say🫵🏽👍🏼🌹

    • @connectingupthedots
      @connectingupthedots Рік тому

      Yes, he's a very excellent biological psychologist but he is a pretty terrible philosopher

    • @nicholaskostopulos8631
      @nicholaskostopulos8631 11 місяців тому +2

      Great comment, Beautifully expressed.

    • @bryck7853
      @bryck7853 11 місяців тому

      Sanford lecture series, could you link?

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 10 місяців тому

      It had to happen. It wasn't free will.
      Lawrence had to take control of his own public life.
      He couldn't let somebody else control his personal contributions to the world video library.

  • @SuperBlinding
    @SuperBlinding Рік тому +80

    Nice of Robert Sapolsky to drop in to listen to Lawrence (wink)

    • @janchilton
      @janchilton 2 місяці тому

      Lawrence is a fan boy. And it's well deserved. Sapolsky is a rabbi for the non-believer.

  • @naftalibendavid
    @naftalibendavid Рік тому +423

    Had lunch with him at USC almost two decades ago. Courteous. Generous. Kind. Listened to my blowhard colleagues with care. Treated our server graciously. Rarely talked about himself. Answered questions with candor and asked questions of those of us who lacked his fame and intellect. Wish more people were like him.

    • @5piles
      @5piles Рік тому +3

      yes, nevertheless the opinions of ppl with 2 second attention spans (based on neural correlate monitoring) regarding the mind are as relevant as the opinions of folk astronomers regarding astronomy. ie, cease speaking.

    • @justindunning3313
      @justindunning3313 Рік тому +22

      I wish there were more people like him. It’s a pity that nobody can choose to be like this; that there’s no free will.

    • @HarryNicNicholas
      @HarryNicNicholas Рік тому +9

      @@5piles can you say that again, i sort of zoned out halfway through.

    • @legalfictionnaturalfact3969
      @legalfictionnaturalfact3969 Рік тому +3

      this is an easy veneer to have with practice. someone who doesn't think free will exists is going to have serious issues underneath. or is dense. or is lying about thinking it doesn't exist.

    • @verycoldhardybles790
      @verycoldhardybles790 Рік тому +1

      Saying that past determines the future is like saying that the tail is wagging the dog :D.
      There is no past and no future. There is eternal now. When bigbang happened, it was now. And is now now.

  • @piotrszarek9802
    @piotrszarek9802 11 місяців тому +12

    The smell of books read when I was a kid...somtimes I talk about that to my grandchildren.
    Unforgetable.
    Great pleasure to listen to discussion.
    Thank you very much.

    • @TheGuinever
      @TheGuinever 9 місяців тому

      Buy old books and let them smell them.

    • @piotrszarek9802
      @piotrszarek9802 9 місяців тому

      You did not grasp my point.
      By the way, I am old enough to to have a library books as old as I am.
      Books develop empathy, compassion and thinkig.
      Buy some and read, please.

  • @fritsgerms3565
    @fritsgerms3565 Рік тому +54

    Thank you for getting prof Sapolsky. Ive consumed many of his books. His time in Africa is legendary.

    • @AudioPervert1
      @AudioPervert1 Рік тому

      this is great, two white men, however academically endowed, discussing free will, while a mass extinction is going on.
      Now place a silly heart zombie turds of late capitalism

  • @daniellegardner6617
    @daniellegardner6617 Рік тому +14

    I love his mention of going to the Natural History Museum as a child and loving it! It really hit home. When I was a child, my father and I would often visit the Penn Museum of Archeology and Anthropology. It was my favorite museum and I loved hanging out with my dad. It's truly remarkable how the little moments in our lives can have such a profound impact. I am now a biological anthropologist! 😉 Robert Sapolski is brilliant and so plugged into the human condition. Been following his work for years now. Fantastic interview!

  • @jetucker1959
    @jetucker1959 Рік тому +113

    Fascinating! I’m grateful that my lack of free will is preventing me from logging off and making dinner.

    • @MrQuadcity
      @MrQuadcity Рік тому +13

      Your stomach might protest, it's not like it had a choice either.

    • @JoePalau
      @JoePalau Рік тому +9

      😂

    • @Corteum
      @Corteum Рік тому +10

      Even your thought that it's your lack of free will which is preventing you from logging off is itself an illusion lol

    • @jeff-onedayatatime.2870
      @jeff-onedayatatime.2870 Рік тому +4

      yes yes yes yes yes. :)

    • @Earthad23
      @Earthad23 Рік тому

      @@MrQuadcity what about a hunger strike ?

  • @josefk332
    @josefk332 Рік тому +82

    I like Schopenhauer’s dismissal of free will “We do what we want but we do not will what we want”.

    • @mindsigh4
      @mindsigh4 11 місяців тому +11

      i love that quote, the version i have:
      man can do what he wills
      but he cannot will what he wills.

    • @mrrooster4876
      @mrrooster4876 10 місяців тому

      New studies in various fields show this isn't true. That the brain is a transmitter and a transducer. This is in fact how the placebo effect works and it works in about 30% of people. You can't just will by wishing, you must believe that thing to be true to your core.

    • @MrManny075
      @MrManny075 9 місяців тому

      You mean do not will what we do, meaning the outcome is not our will. is like the guy who shoots someone five times thinking he did the job but the guy survives

    • @Traderhood
      @Traderhood 9 місяців тому

      Didn’t he kill himself?

    • @davefordham14
      @davefordham14 9 місяців тому +1

      That is just semantics. We know what we mean by free will, if Schopenhauer wants to distort that just to perpetuate the illusion that there is no free will, he's welcome to do so but it's up to the individual to dismiss his dismissal.

  • @alberthjaltason8152
    @alberthjaltason8152 Рік тому +50

    I had an epiphany a while back that free will doesn't exist. It changed a lot for me. Years of guilt and angst and regret was washed away, and I feel much better. Helped with depression and anxiety in a very real way. Seems to me that religions tout the idea of free will to make one responsible for their array of sins and the like. I haven't believed in any religious idea since I reached the age of reason at 8, but the idea of free will stuck around until lately. It's just such a ingrained thing that we take for granted. No more!!

    • @MrQuadcity
      @MrQuadcity Рік тому +7

      Psychological suffering often manifests as guilt, blame, pride, worry, anxiety, along with expectation and attachment to particular outcomes, all of which stem from a deeply ingrained belief in personal doership and a misconception happiness is be found in the flow of life.

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому +4

      You ARE responsible for your sins (or more accurately - mistakes). I feel for you because ALL religions are the cause of a lot of the misery on the planet. They ALL teach an altered and perverted message from their Scriptures in order to put Fear into their followers in order to control them. Even Jesus said " Woe unto ye Pharisees. You are supposed to lead the people to God". They didn't then and they don't NOW.
      It's a long story but I have been blessed and ordained by God Himself. No need to feel guilt. In fact, God says that our only two best friends are Love and Awareness. Our only two enemies are Fear and Guilt. Maybe an experience of mine years ago will help .
      One day I came across some writing that said "Only God judges me". I was immediately and strongly urged by the Holy Spirit to respond to this and so we wrote " Wrong. God does not judge, nor condemn, nor punish. God is only UNCONDITIONAL LOVE. It is man who judges, condemns, and punishes. God is not cruel. It is man who is cruel".
      You see, what man calls sin God calls mistakes and mistakes are not dealt with through punishment but are rather offered the opportunity (as may as is needed) for correction. This is a large part of what reincarnation is about.
      God is not what religions say He is. I am a human who makes his fair share of mistakes. In the 16 years now that I have been having a very close personal relationship with God - He/She/It has shown me NOTHING BUT Love and Humor. Have I ever got stories about His Humor.
      God wants a personal relationship with each and every one of His children. I advise people to seek Him. It says how in the bible - with ALL of your heart, mind, soul,and strength. It's so much better to get the Truth straight from the horse's mouth rather than having lying middlemen ( church leaders) between you and God.
      God has revealed to me that, even though Scriptures have been altered, He has protected important stuff such as how to get close to God and many of the words of Jesus. Being close to God is AWESOME.
      In January 2008 He gave me a job description that says " I am sending you out by the power of My Spirit to Release those bound by Fear, to Proclaim Forgiveness, and to show Love to ALL men". Ironically, even if I don't like you it is necessary that I Love you. If you have ANY Fears please call upon me. I enjoy my job and, with God's help, I am very good at it. God's 3rd Desire is that "Life be an experience full of Joy and never-ending expansion.
      Bless you 🙏❤️

    • @MrQuadcity
      @MrQuadcity Рік тому

      @@garychartrand7378 Your perspective on the role of religion, God, and personal responsibility is quite comprehensive and offers a lot to consider. I appreciate your emphasis on love, awareness, and the absence of judgment from a divine perspective. However, even if one believes that free will is an illusion, it doesn't negate the concept of responsibility within the societal framework. Whether one's actions are pre-determined or not, they still have consequences that one must face, both socially and legally. The idea that we are not the 'doers' in a deterministic universe doesn't absolve us from the outcomes of what gets done through us. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and adding depth to this discussion.

    • @doriesse824
      @doriesse824 Рік тому

      @@garychartrand7378 Where does the Bible talk about Awareness? I've been wanting to find it for a long time. I know there are things that allude to Oneness, but what about Knowing or Awareness? I can think of one:
      Now this is eternal life, that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent. John 17:3

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому +1

      @@doriesse824 I have to say that I find your question a little awkward. I, myself, am not an expert in any of these things that you mention - and you forgot consciousness in your list. I don't understand why you are under the impression that I could be of help here.
      Except for my knowing and sureness about Oneness , I can only give you my best guess about the rest. ONENESS comes ,sort of, in two concepts. 1) that EVERYTHING in the Physical Universe ( including us) are all interconnected. Makes sense easily if you consider OUR sun going nova. We obviously would ALL be affected. If a distant star(or sun) went nova , it would still affect us as the Universe would no longer be the same. 2) "I and the Father are ONE". WE are all ONE. If one of us is hurt, we are ALL hurt. If one of us helped , we are ALL healed.
      Awareness? I am not a bible expert in that I cannot quote where to find each and every bible fact but I have a very good general sense of most things that are in the bible - not that that really matters. Some people believe that everything in the bible is truly the word of God. It's not true. Much of the Scriptures (of ALL religions). have been modified and altered by the church leaders in order to put the Fear of God into their followers for the purpose of controlling them. There is NOTHING at all to Fear from a God who DOES Love you (us) UNCONDITIONALLY. Even Jesus said " Woe ye Pharisees. You are supposed to lead the people to God". They didn't then and they don't NOW. As for the accuracy of the bible God did reveal to me that He has protected any of the important stuff such as how to get close to God ( with ALL of your heart, mind, soul, and strength) and much of the words of Jesus. What people need to do is to use discernment in order to know if what is said is coming from God or from some other source. If it contains the Highest, the Clearest, and the Grandest then it is likely from the Father. The Highest always contains Joy. The Clearest always contains Truth. The Grandest always contains what is called Love. If any one of these are missing then the message is not from God but from some other source.
      There's so much that I could say ( books worth) and this is not the proper place or time. What is important is in my job description from God that says I am sending you out by the power of My Spirit to Release those bound by Fear, to Proclaim Forgiveness, and to show Love to ALL men". Does that sound like somebody to be afraid of. In my close personal relationship with God for 16 years now He/She/It has shown me NOTHING BUT Love and Humor even though I am a human who makes his fair share of mistakes. Most people call mistakes "sin" . ALL sins are considered mistakes by the Father. Like I said , I have much to tell the world. Thanks to religions, people have a very wrong idea about God.
      I advise everyone to forget about the lying middlemen (church leaders) and to develop your own personal relationship with God. It's what He wants - to be personally close to ALL of His children. If YOU get close to God then YOU can get the Truth straight from the horse's mouth yourself. This I have experience of and I am as sure of as consciousness - "I AM"
      I seem to have meandered off topic. As I said, I'm not sure of what you really wanted in your comment. God hasn't called me home yet. You can still contact me again if you wish. 16 years ago I asked God if I could leave this life. He actually answered me in words. He said " No Gary. You are only just beginning". I was planning on leaving even if God should say no "somehow" but I experienced a miracle. As soon as I heard His words - ALL pain left me and I was instantly filled with peace, joy and bliss that is impossible to describe in words. I have other miracles performed through me with WITNESSES and many more without witnesses. NOBODY can tell me that there is no God. Impossible! Non-believers have it so WRONG.
      Anyway, have a great day ( and life). Bless you 🙏❤️. At your service, Gary.
      PS: I just read your email again and I can add that I know of no place in the bible that mentions Awareness or Consciousness . They are modern psychological terms. You must know that they are closely related even though they are both presently in the arena of speculation.
      I do know something about KNOWING. Knowing comes from the Truth - of your experiences. Experience is why you are born into physicality. In God's realm there is only KNOWING (God's Truth). This was not enough. God knew that He was God but He wished to know what it FEELS like to be God. Feeling requires experience - how do you Feel about any particular experience. ALL is ONE and so God is able to FEEL what it is like to be God IN, AS, and THROUGH us ( his physically endowed Spirit children). Hope that helps. 😃

  • @itslightanddark
    @itslightanddark Рік тому +11

    This is one of the kindest and most beautiful conversations I've ever seen. Thanks Lawrence for demonstrating such a way of being and showing Robert so well. Peace and strength to us all.

  • @xmathmanx
    @xmathmanx Рік тому +19

    Great conversation, what made me subscribe was hearing Lawrence say he went vegetarian having understood the argument for it, making that vital link between knowledge and behaviour that most people ignore

    • @sylviaowega3839
      @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому +1

      His vegetarianism is the only things that I disagree with him. Lol

    • @xmathmanx
      @xmathmanx Рік тому +5

      @@sylviaowega3839 yeah, why even bother eating if you're not being cruel, right?

  • @Nettamorphosis
    @Nettamorphosis Рік тому +26

    I love a conversation that cracks my mind open. This is one. On top of all you said about why we should be honest about free will: The truth is too lovely to hold back. 🙂

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому

      I'm guessing here. You are an atheist aren't you. No believer could possibly believe his dribble. I welcome a debate with you. I am not a believer. I am a KNOWER and understander of Free Will. I dare you. I KNOW, without a shadow of a doubt, that God and Free Will exist. It's only non-believers who are capable of believing this crap. I would love to tell you the truth. It just occured to me recently that this man is what has been called a Deceiver.
      Before you may decide to engage me I should offer you full disclosure. I have been having a very close personal relationship with God for 16 years now. He/She/it has performed miracles through me with WITNESSES and many more without witnesses. In January 2008 He gave me a job description that says " I am sending you out by the power of My Spirit to Release those bound by Fear, to Proclaim Forgiveness, and to Show Love to ALL men". Ironically, I don't have to like you ( or Mr. Sapolsky) but it is necessary that I Love you. Bottom line is that NOBODY can tell me that there is no God or the Free Will that is essential for the proper function of God's Perfect System.
      Want to debate? Maybe your mind really is cracked

  • @peppepre1
    @peppepre1 Рік тому +19

    I’ve followed both of the two of you and watched most of prof. Sapolsky and prof. Strauss lectures on line. I can truly say that I love you both!!!
    Thanks for all you’ve contributed and done!!!

  • @OOTW001
    @OOTW001 Рік тому +23

    What a profound conversation. This resonated with me at so many levels. I truly believe, knowing objectively how the world works is the only way to get rid of biases that have been bogging us down for so long. The best thing we can do is We can only change ourselves.

    • @akelaforte3520
      @akelaforte3520 Рік тому +8

      And how do you do that if you have no free will?

    • @ThelastofNazarick
      @ThelastofNazarick Рік тому +3

      ​@akelaforte3520 absolutely agree. There is no utility in their definition of free will.

    • @annaynely
      @annaynely Рік тому +1

      With neuroplapsticiry but only in a world that is just & isn't enslaving & meritocratic.

    • @TeaParty1776
      @TeaParty1776 11 місяців тому +1

      > We can only change ourselves
      Stoicism ended in Christianity. Do you think it will be different this time?

  • @amaiwright
    @amaiwright Рік тому +17

    What a privilege to be allowed to enjoy this conversation between the both of you 💗 thank you!!

    • @georgefordham417
      @georgefordham417 9 місяців тому

      A wonderful thing,❤

    • @janchilton
      @janchilton 2 місяці тому

      I so agree. it's a rare and precious gift.

  • @stephanodermatt5467
    @stephanodermatt5467 Рік тому +37

    Just ordered the book. FWIW, Behave is my most favorite biology book of all times. I do own two hardcopys - one to give friends to read and my very own, with lots of marks and comments in it. Whenever I reread it, there is new stuff to be discovered. So I am looking so much forward to reading Sapolsky's newest work!

    • @pedestrian_0
      @pedestrian_0 Рік тому

      what's so good about behave

    • @stephanodermatt5467
      @stephanodermatt5467 Рік тому +1

      @@pedestrian_0 Read it, or at least read the reviews, and you will know.

  • @samwalters2904
    @samwalters2904 Рік тому +3

    Lawrence, I come here not only to hear your guest speak, as many interviews go. I thoroughly enjoy your interjections, thoughts and comments. Any interviewer can line up questions, any interviewer can spoil a conversation with inane talk, but you sir always bring me, atleast, an enjoyable dialogue, and for that I commend you. Yours are always the ones I prioritise. Keep up the fantastic work!!

    • @jimosborne2
      @jimosborne2 11 місяців тому

      Seriously if you counted the spoken words of this podcast- just making up the number of 100,000 words, Krause spoke 75,000 of them.

    • @Athoseye
      @Athoseye 10 місяців тому

      If you were to count the seconds where Prof. Krauss ummed and ahed, it would probably be equivalent to the time Prof. Sapolsky was allowed to react.

    • @jimosborne2
      @jimosborne2 10 місяців тому

      @@AthoseyeLawrence should just interview himself for the first half the podcast, and then the guest in the second half. That way we can just fast forward to the second half 😂

    • @KingZuluKing
      @KingZuluKing 10 місяців тому

      Lawrence is behaving like an asshole, I think he is trying to get points by talking quantum mechanics which bring him to the filed where he has some knowledge and can talk endlessly. gimme a break,

  • @TheRosakennedy
    @TheRosakennedy 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you both!!.They said Teachers have three loves:love of learning,love of learners,and the love of bringing the first two loves together". Much love and gratitud professor Sapolsky.

  • @JAYMOAP
    @JAYMOAP Рік тому +133

    Robert Sapolsky is another level. Great choice of guest

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas Рік тому

      Great and lowly are RELATIVE. 😉
      Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱

    • @1PrinceWilliam
      @1PrinceWilliam Рік тому +4

      I’ve only become aware of him and his work recently but his lectures/talks are irresistible.

    • @mysund
      @mysund Рік тому +3

      There was no choice, only physics.

    • @midnightchurningspriteshaq8533
      @midnightchurningspriteshaq8533 Рік тому +3

      easily one of the smartest people around

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому +1

      @@1PrinceWilliam I just became aware of him also . Unlike you, I tried to tolerate his nonsense as much as I could stand. I find him lacking in intelligence and very resistible.

  • @manucharchitaishvili6416
    @manucharchitaishvili6416 Рік тому +3

    Robert Sapolsky one of the greatest minds. Always happy to listen him. Thank you for this interview.

    • @ruprecht9997
      @ruprecht9997 Рік тому

      As these "great minds" get older, and more talkative, they bask in their own eloquence, and feel they have so much of value to share, branching into philosophy and areas outside their expertise, producing word salad. They love "conversations" over speeches, since the latter would require them to order their thoughts. This is intellectual laziness, running down random tangets.

  • @animmigrant2001
    @animmigrant2001 Рік тому +204

    I wish I could hear Sapolsky talk more than Krauss. 😊

    • @davidplumer8766
      @davidplumer8766 Рік тому +33

      There's a great series of his lectures at Stanford here on the you tubes. All 100% unadulterated Sapolsky.

    • @alsmith-wg4cr
      @alsmith-wg4cr Рік тому +17

      thousands of hours of sapolsky lectures on youtube. they are game changing. enjoy

    • @dukeallen432
      @dukeallen432 Рік тому +12

      Kraus does great job.

    • @andrew348
      @andrew348 Рік тому +3

      Krause does an alright job.

    • @tugevpuder
      @tugevpuder Рік тому +6

      Sapolsky is too charismatic and wise to be compared to anyone.
      Thank you for this podcast!

  • @VioletACordy
    @VioletACordy Рік тому +1

    🌈🌲🌲Dr. Lawrence, thank you for inviting Professor Robert Sapolsky: “The Illusion of Free Will” THIS PODCST IS VERY EDIFYING + BRILLIANT ~ I must listed 2 it again * * * L’Chaim ~ v. (Toronto ~ Australia)🌲

  • @ruellerz
    @ruellerz Рік тому +14

    Thank you for sharing this video, and I appreciate the insightful discussion of Robert Sapolsky's book. I did, however, find myself wishing for more of Robert Sapolsky's perspective on the topic of free will.

  • @CoreyAnton
    @CoreyAnton 10 місяців тому +2

    Wonderful and engaging. Gracious all around. I wish something would be said, though, about the role of symbols, and communication technologies (clocks, calendars, and money). These are not outside the laws of physics, do not violate laws of physics, but do seem to leverage a kind of agency that would not be possible without them.

  • @riverlevity
    @riverlevity Рік тому +14

    This was the best interview with Robert Sapolsky I have listened to and I listen to all of them I can find. Thank you Lawrence for providing us with your own well thought out questions, support and intellect which provided me with a better understanding of Roberts' beautiful book, 'Determined'.

  • @jeffcolorado
    @jeffcolorado 11 місяців тому +1

    I started this while doing chores and wasn't expecting much. I soon stopped my chores and listened to the entire conversation. Excellent topic and discussion. Thanks for sharing this.

  • @unfingbelievable1
    @unfingbelievable1 Рік тому +16

    What an absolute joy this conversation was!

    • @JoePalau
      @JoePalau Рік тому

      The distinction between predictability and determinism is priceless. That no law of physics is universal is a stunning corollary. The level of discussion is as excellent - as informed and well argued as I have had the joy to witness. ❤️

    • @stanleyklein524
      @stanleyklein524 Рік тому

      These are very old ideas and distinctions. I do not expect the uneducated 9at least in these matters) public to know this, but the charlatan (i.e., Sapolsky) is in a position to make his sources known (assuming he actually knows? We could ask the demon).@@JoePalau

  • @ЕкатеринаРизаева-е9о

    Thank you a lot for sharing this! Listening it from Russia, can’t wait to read the book. Idea of no free will rather gives a hope that people don’t choose to be evil, but are the victims of many unpleasant circumstances, misinformation and learned helplessness. This reduces hate and intolerance towards those, who intuitively “deserve” this.

    • @leahcartterrab8964
      @leahcartterrab8964 11 місяців тому

      Yes, but I still find it impossible to have compassion for Putin. The Russian people lose the most. Why not just lock him away "quarantine " him. Come on Russians!

  • @dusty3913
    @dusty3913 Рік тому +106

    My favorite parts are the places where Lawrence doesn’t cut Robert off when he’s about to elaborate.

    • @briandoroshuk6837
      @briandoroshuk6837 Рік тому +8

      😂

    • @fndngnvrlnd
      @fndngnvrlnd Рік тому +18

      Despite my interest in Sapolzky, the supercilious and vain Mr Krauss forced me to stop listening!!!
      Terrible podcast!!!!!

    • @annaynely
      @annaynely Рік тому +6

      I think they both compliment each other very well. It's a convo between two friends and that is one of the things that makes it interesting

    • @IanTula
      @IanTula Рік тому +5

      ​@fndngnvrlnd
      I agree...he's to intrusive!

    • @nicolaspoblete2087
      @nicolaspoblete2087 11 місяців тому +8

      Totally! Verging on narcissism....

  • @didifischervideo
    @didifischervideo 10 місяців тому +2

    As Austrian in Vienna I'm very proud of Anton Zeilinger (quantum physicist, Nobel Price 2022), Siegmund Freud (Psychoanalysis), and Mozart and Co - so I have three remarks to make and to ask one "personal" deliberation:
    1) Zeilinger says: in the quantum world is "blind chance", and therefore "the universe is NOT determined"
    2) Freud says: "The ego is not a master in its own house" because of the unconscious mind - but with help we can become aware of our unconscious mind
    3) Musicians go the opposite way: they practice really hard, so that the musical skills becomes their "second nature" - they want to be in the "flow" without the cerebral cortex
    4) Isn't my whole brain "me" - so if something in me reacts before I'm aware of it in my cerebral cortex - isn't that still "me"?

    • @GeorgeTsiros
      @GeorgeTsiros 6 місяців тому

      what you experience is the result of the brain's function.
      Meaning, your perception, your entire existence, is a _subset_ of what the brain does. Also, being a result, you have no way of influencing anything. You certainly feel like you make choices, decisions, but that's just it. You only feel you are making a choice. The choice has been made already.
      Your existence is that of an observer and nothing more.

  • @luminyam6145
    @luminyam6145 Рік тому +4

    I love Robert Sapolsky, what an incredible interview. I think I am going to buy that book as a family gift for Christmas.

  • @directinprint
    @directinprint Рік тому +28

    He was in an interview once (which I had to watch because I love his books and lectures so much) and he said: of course I live AS IF I have free will… I make lists etc.
    I was SO grateful. Of course we perceive ourselves to have will (not much free about it), but daily I pretend to have free will. It’s a necessary delusion (for me at least). I can’t wait for this new book!!! Yay - it’s on audible, boo it’s not narrated by him!

    • @gmw3083
      @gmw3083 Рік тому +4

      The atheists' conclusion. That you're nothing in the vastness of the universe and just a cog on the wheel of time.
      Your free will is expressed in all the mistakes you make, which atheists never stop making.
      On the other hand, when you hear and listen to the frequency of your intuitive soul guide, you might eventually learn to strike a balance between your own will and earths plan. The earth is as alive as we are. God is underfoot. Not vengeful. Nature itself is blind without our eyes as its witness. The scales always revert to the mean. Civilizations crumble for a reason. You're welcome.....

    • @Earthad23
      @Earthad23 Рік тому +3

      @@gmw3083Rational materialism is their god. Unfortunately what they fail to accept is reality isn’t rational.

    • @gmw3083
      @gmw3083 Рік тому

      @Earthad23 Yup. Reality is blind without our witness. But the majority, including these two, have chosen to double and triple down on their blindfolds. The science is safe n effective...

    • @SQAProd
      @SQAProd Рік тому +2

      ​@@gmw3083 yeee right. Lay off that crack mate.

    • @gmw3083
      @gmw3083 Рік тому

      @SQAProd Lay off the science. Oops, too late....

  • @edvardm4348
    @edvardm4348 Рік тому +6

    This was nothing short of excellent. Thank you so much, both to Sapolsky and Lawrence. Enjoyed every single minute of it

  • @N3Rd32
    @N3Rd32 6 місяців тому

    I met Lawrence at a lecture and book signing. He was super kind and thoughtful. I love his passion and dedication. A powerhouse and giant of the sciences.

  • @DulceN
    @DulceN Рік тому +70

    I love listening to Prof. Sapolsky since I found his videos at the start of the pandemic. Pity that he doesn’t have a bigger presence and more recent vids on YT…

    • @MrRollingEgo
      @MrRollingEgo Рік тому +8

      This is changing quickly!!! He is on so many podcasts lately

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому +3

      @@MrRollingEgo UNFORTUNATELY.

    • @f.osborn1579
      @f.osborn1579 11 місяців тому

      Are you referring to his lecture series videos on human behavioral biology…like 24-25 videos from his Stanford behavioral biology class? If not, check them out too. It doesn’t disappoint!

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 10 місяців тому

      I came to the same conclusions without the videos.
      So what have YOU been doing?
      Obviously, nothing to help yourself.
      That's right!
      I said YOU suck.
      What are you going to do about it!?
      Take my rainforest away?
      Take my ocean away?
      Huh! Huh! ??
      Switch off my computer 🖥...
      I dare yah!! I dare yah!

    • @Gma7788
      @Gma7788 10 місяців тому

      ​@MrRollingEgo
      You don't need them.
      Obviously you're not listening to him.
      You're just here to show yourself off in the internet group.
      You fake person!
      We've seen people like you before.
      You stop public posing.

  • @samsungtablet5744
    @samsungtablet5744 11 місяців тому +2

    This was awesome. I feel so fortunate to be able to listen to folks such as yourselves while I putter at home. I too feel the idea of no free will so liberating. No longer putting so many demands and responsibility on myself, makes life just so much more carefree.

  • @JimJWalker
    @JimJWalker Рік тому +5

    Sapolsky's views on Free Will is always a treat. Thank you!

    • @millerstation92
      @millerstation92 11 місяців тому +1

      notreally. He does not take into account the creation of the universe. So since an undetermined event had to occur in the past therefore determinism cant be true

    • @chess9167
      @chess9167 10 місяців тому

      @@millerstation92 It's true that some aspects of the universe, including its origins, might appear indeterminate or unexplained by current scientific understanding. However, this doesn't necessarily invalidate the concept of determinism in the context of human decision-making and free will.
      First, let's address the idea of the universe's creation being an 'undetermined event.' While it's true that the exact mechanisms and causes of the universe's origin are still subjects of scientific debate and exploration, this doesn't automatically mean that the event was indeterminate in a philosophical or physical sense. Theories such as the Big Bang are grounded in physical laws, suggesting that even at its inception, the universe was governed by deterministic principles, though our understanding of these principles might be incomplete.
      Furthermore, the nature of the universe's creation - whether it was a deterministic or indeterminate event - doesn't necessarily impact the deterministic nature of events within the universe, especially at the scale of human existence. The concept of determinism in philosophy and science often refers to the idea that every event or state of affairs, including human decisions, is the consequence of preceding events in accordance with the laws of nature.
      When considering quantum mechanics and the role of indeterminacy at the subatomic level, it's crucial to understand that even if certain phenomena are governed by randomness, this does not equate to human free will. Randomness, by its very nature, is beyond control and predictability. Therefore, if our decisions or actions were influenced by random quantum events, they would still not be under our conscious control. In essence, randomness does not equate to freedom of choice. Decisions influenced by random events are just as uncontrollable as those determined by strict causality. Thus, whether our universe is deterministic or has elements of randomness at the quantum level, neither scenario necessarily provides a basis for the kind of free will that implies conscious, autonomous decision-making

  • @taongatakaro8411
    @taongatakaro8411 9 місяців тому

    Dr Sapolsky, much gratitude and respect to you for pulling all the pieces together, and identifying some very bright lines for the benefit of future generations. Be good ancestors everybody ❤

  • @jessicajae7777
    @jessicajae7777 Рік тому +12

    I read his primate book. It was actually really great. His humor and intelligence made a book i would never normally read incredibly rewarding. Ill definitely read more. Because that was his first book so hopefully they just kept getting better. Yet theres no denying that he doesn't know his superiority and it might affect his language in his next books but I'm guessing not just based on his still long hippie type hair which i know isn't the best thing to base this on but if you read his first book you would understand why.

  • @bobdillaber1195
    @bobdillaber1195 Рік тому +2

    Each time i listen to him, even when listening to a talk the second or third time, i increase my understanding.

  • @anil2011bk
    @anil2011bk Рік тому +12

    Thank you so very much Mr. Krauss and Mr. Sapolsky. This was invigorating and illuminating

  • @itoibo4208
    @itoibo4208 Рік тому +7

    Love your books and lectures online. Accepting determinism can change the world, and I am here for it.

    • @fuglong
      @fuglong Рік тому

      Lol I am reading the comments before watching and you all sound so crazy. You won't change anything, you'll just let what is already going to happen....happen?

    • @itoibo4208
      @itoibo4208 Рік тому +1

      @@fuglong not at all. By realizing there is no free will, we can look at things more objectively and solve problems scientifically. Ideas like revenge and blame go out, ideas like understanding and making things better come in.

    • @fuglong
      @fuglong Рік тому

      @@itoibo4208 lmao I guess so, easy way to skip true understanding and actual personal growth. How about you don't hold resentment or judge people because you understand where they're coming from and have grown to feel others pain as your own and give people the benefit of the doubt, and forgive, and/or set healthy boundaries? Sure you can be a weirdo about it, or you could just grow up and try to understand WHY the world got to be this unfair and HOW we can improve it for everyone. A shitty coping mechanism that just makes you feel no guilt or makes you think you're above bias is not a healthy or viable solution.

    • @anti506
      @anti506 5 місяців тому

      ​​@@itoibo4208 or could be justification for potential criminals.

  • @sobekneferu4041
    @sobekneferu4041 Рік тому +20

    2 amazing scientists! I absolutely love this conversation. I love the idea of talking about childhoods and what attracted certain ppl to their fields of study

  • @davidwright8432
    @davidwright8432 Рік тому +12

    Chaotic systems are not predictable, but they are deterministic!

    • @PK-333
      @PK-333 9 місяців тому

      riigghhttt

  • @Rocky_Anunnaki
    @Rocky_Anunnaki Рік тому +38

    Long live! Robert Sapolsky

    • @Azupiru
      @Azupiru Рік тому +2

      Thousands of years ago, these two would have been considered prophets after society felt the effects of the implications of these Abrahamic-World-shattering facts, which they would again couch in some sort of theism.

  • @aftonhalters
    @aftonhalters 9 місяців тому

    Watching you two is like watching night and day, calm and hyper on the same screen.... the stressed and the calm. I learned something about hair folicals and stress back in the 70's. A tight scalp kills folicals a loose scalp... ;)

  • @ruellerz
    @ruellerz Рік тому +4

    Lets all applaud the viewers who turned out alright if we landed here and appreciate this content.

  • @LetMeThinkItThrough
    @LetMeThinkItThrough Рік тому +1

    Great guest, Robert Sapolsky is on a whole different level. Pinnacle of science, I agree with you, a genius who writes perfectly

  • @Rx7man
    @Rx7man Рік тому +7

    Really looking forward to this, I've listened to the human behavioral biology lecture series at least a half a dozen times..

  • @philosothink
    @philosothink Рік тому +1

    Behave was a total page-turner. I read that book like it was my first Asmiov. Ty for inserting that knowledge into my brain Dr. Robert.

  • @jessicajae7777
    @jessicajae7777 Рік тому +18

    He is a genius. That's the best opening statement of absolute truth I've ever heard

    • @jonnySkv
      @jonnySkv 11 місяців тому

      What is his genius? Is it that he is ready to forgive criminals, but cannot understand his own statements? Personally, I do not believe that a person does not have freedom of choice. But that’s exactly what Sapolsky thinks, right? So why then does he consider the criminal innocent, and convinces me otherwise? So, according to Sapolsky, I do not have freedom of choice and I am doomed to believe that freedom of choice exists. Is not it? And I’m generally ashamed of Lawrence Krauss, I didn’t expect this from him.

    • @coachafella
      @coachafella 9 місяців тому

      @@jonnySkv
      "I do not believe that a person does not have freedom of choice. " The obvious question is why do you believe that? What method do you use to establish belief? Does scientific evidence and rational conclusions drawn from it influence your beliefs, or do you simply pick a belief that you find appealing and disregard evidence against it?
      If you want answers to your questions read Sapolsky's book, or listen to the audio recording. You could very well learn something that changes your belief.

    • @jonnySkv
      @jonnySkv 9 місяців тому

      You can read, right? I already explained in the post above. Sapolsky allows criminals not to be punished because they do not have freedom of choice. Right? Why doesn’t he allow me to have my own opinion, since I also don’t have freedom of choice? NEVER! You hear? Never! criminals will not be released from responsibility. It's not me who has to prove anything to you, friend. It’s you and Sapolsky who have to prove something to me, do you understand? Because in reality it happens as I say. And not you and Sapolsky))))@@coachafella

    • @coachafella
      @coachafella 9 місяців тому

      @@jonnySkv What you are spouting is just subjective, irrational nonsense. Can you read? Try reading his book then you may have an actual basis for criticism, rather than uninformed confirmation bias.

    • @jonnySkv
      @jonnySkv 9 місяців тому

      What does my opinion have to do with this? The fact that the criminal must be punished is the opinion of all humanity. You are the marginalized ones. I read the book. And this is wild nonsense. I never speak without reading the topic. Do you have any other arguments besides “read a book”? ))))) I give you the essence, and you answer me - “read the book.” I read it! Name any argument from the book - I will destroy it. I've already done it))@@coachafella

  • @juliacaesar8462
    @juliacaesar8462 Рік тому +3

    Oh dear me, so wonderful are these two gentlemen. Thank you for making my day with this fascinating discussion.

  • @TheBoofer331
    @TheBoofer331 Рік тому +4

    Phenomenal. This was really engaging and agreeable for me. A much better conversation than when I’ve tried to bring it up to friends lol.

  • @billhillary5536
    @billhillary5536 Місяць тому

    Thank you Lawrence and Robert: an interesting and edifying conversation with an uplifting finale! Learn, contemplate, share, repeat.

  • @msshaffer5
    @msshaffer5 Рік тому +5

    Soon as I came across this I knew I was in for a gem. I’ve always said, there is no such thing as free will.

    • @SpaceCadet48-j9t
      @SpaceCadet48-j9t Рік тому +1

      What determined you to make that exact and particular comment ?

  • @gerhardfischer6057
    @gerhardfischer6057 Рік тому +2

    What a wonderful man is Robert Sapolsky! Enduring two and a half ours with someone who is unable of clear and coherent communication... with a sweet, forgiving and melancholic smile...

  • @dspondike
    @dspondike Рік тому +3

    So wonderful to listen to these two minds in conversation.

  • @flipflop6525
    @flipflop6525 2 місяці тому

    I just woke up in the middle of this conversation. I need to watch it all, but I probably would say that we were running amok most of our evolution. Sounds like a great podcast. I can't see how free will exists.

  • @charlotteblanchard
    @charlotteblanchard Рік тому +39

    “I want you to elaborate on…” and then proceeds to not allow Robert to elaborate on anything. Lol. Let your guest complete a thought Dr. Kraus. 😅

    • @Lobishomem
      @Lobishomem Рік тому +7

      It seems the guests are there to give Lawrence material for future name dropping. They are usually referred to as “friends”. He’s starting to remind me of Larry King!

    • @animmigrant2001
      @animmigrant2001 Рік тому +2

      You are so right. Krauss gulps his guests’ time.

    • @jadehunter7617
      @jadehunter7617 Рік тому +2

      I was thinking the same thing and then I came across your comment so I'm not the only one that thinks he talks too much let your guests speak😢

    • @davidlamb7524
      @davidlamb7524 Рік тому +1

      He never seems to realise this. He probably desn't read the comments !

    • @davidlamb7524
      @davidlamb7524 Рік тому +2

      7 minutes in before Lawrence allowed his guest to say a few words

  • @drcisneros
    @drcisneros 11 місяців тому +7

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
    00:00 🎵 *La introducción menciona a Robert Sapolsky y su trabajo.*
    01:10 📚 *Lawrence Krauss habla sobre el libro de Sapolsky "Determined: The Science of Life Without Free Will".*
    03:46 💼 *Se menciona la presión de los padres de Sapolsky para que se convierta en médico.*
    09:54 🦍 *Sapolsky comparte cómo se interesó en los gorilas cuando era niño.*
    20:10 🧬 *Sapolsky habla sobre su elección de estudiar biología y luego neurobiología.*
    23:58 🐾 *Sapolsky menciona su enfoque en estudiar el comportamiento animal y la neurobiología.*
    24:14 🧠 *Robert Sapolsky plantea que el comportamiento humano está determinado por una serie de causas, y no hay decisiones sin causa.*
    26:16 🧪 *La interacción entre biología, genética, y ambiente da forma a quiénes somos y cómo nos comportamos.*
    31:09 🤖 *Sapolsky sugiere que reconocer la falta de libre albedrío puede ser liberador y dar más valor a cada momento de la vida.*
    34:55 🤔 *La idea de no tener libre albedrío puede ser difícil de aceptar emocionalmente, pero Sapolsky argumenta que es una perspectiva válida y sostenible intelectualmente.*
    44:23 🧬 *Sapolsky destaca que diversas disciplinas científicas, como la neurobiología, la genética y la evolución, convergen en la negación del libre albedrío, ya que todas están interconectadas en la comprensión del comportamiento humano.*
    48:11 🧠 *La creencia en el libre albedrío persiste, incluso cuando se reconoce que vivimos en un mundo determinista.*
    50:16 🤔 *Definir el libre albedrío a menudo comienza por definir lo que no es, como la noción de que las intenciones son suficientes para demostrarlo.*
    52:15 🧠 *Los experimentos demuestran que la sensación de libre albedrío puede ser manipulada, lo que sugiere que es una ilusión.*
    56:09 🤯 *La conciencia es un fenómeno superficial, y gran parte de nuestro comportamiento es inconsciente.*
    58:52 🌌 *El determinismo implica que no hay factores mágicos involucrados en nuestras acciones, y se basa en leyes naturales.*
    01:03:07 🤯 *Nuestra percepción de la libre voluntad puede ser tan poderosa que incluso cuando se demuestra que es una ilusión, muchas personas siguen aferrándose a ella.*
    01:05:01 🤔 *La idea de un generador de posibilidades separado del cerebro es una falacia y no resuelve el problema del libre albedrío.*
    01:10:13 🌐 *Creer que solo es necesario conocer el presente es éticamente problemático, ya que perpetúa un mundo donde las personas son recompensadas o castigadas por cosas que no eligieron.*
    01:12:30 🧠 *Las decisiones que creemos tomar libremente a menudo están influenciadas por factores emocionales y externos, como la belleza o la bondad de una opción, que afectan la activación de ciertas regiones cerebrales.*
    01:15:12 🤯 *La biología y la evolución influyen en nuestra moralidad y racionalidad, y estos aspectos se desarrollaron en un contexto evolutivo muy diferente.*
    01:19:03 🐭 *Diferentes especies animales tienen sistemas sociales y comportamientos diferentes, incluso en relación con la monogamia o la poligamia, influenciados por genes y hormonas.*
    01:21:07 💡 *Nuestro comportamiento y características son el resultado de una interacción compleja entre variantes genéticas y experiencias ambientales que regulan la expresión génica.*
    01:26:57 👶 *Las experiencias traumáticas y adversas en la infancia pueden tener un impacto duradero en el comportamiento y la salud en la edad adulta, influenciando la regulación genética y la expresión de genes.*
    01:31:34 🌍 *Las diferencias culturales también afectan la biología y el comportamiento humano, como las culturas de honor en comunidades pastorales y la influencia de entornos ecológicos en la religión.*
    01:35:23 🤔 *La interacción entre la genética y el entorno es clave para comprender quiénes somos y cómo nos comportamos, y demuestra que nuestras elecciones y responsabilidades están influenciadas por factores más allá de nuestro control.*
    01:35:38 🧬 *La cultura influye en las personas y sus creencias religiosas, pero la regulación de los genes y las respuestas agresivas también se ven afectadas por la cultura.*
    01:37:16 💡 *Experimento en el que el lugar de origen de las personas influyó en sus respuestas a situaciones de violación de normas y niveles de hormonas del estrés.*
    01:39:41 🏫 *La educación pública podría alejar a los niños de las influencias culturales de sus padres para ofrecerles una perspectiva más amplia.*
    01:41:04 🤖 *La ilusión de que las decisiones en el pasado podrían haber hecho a alguien mejor en el presente.*
    01:45:01 🧠 *El papel del cortex prefrontal en la toma de decisiones, influenciado por la biología y la historia personal.*
    01:56:00 🔄 *La neuroplasticidad demuestra que el cambio en el cerebro es posible, incluso en circunstancias desfavorables, a través de mecanismos deterministas.*
    01:59:16 🧠 *La gente puede aprender y cambiar, pero esto se basa en la comprensión científica, no en la fuerza de carácter.*
    02:01:18 🌪️ *El caos no implica la existencia del libre albedrío; la impredecibilidad no es lo mismo que la indeterminación.*
    02:05:18 🧪 *Los sistemas caóticos son deterministas pero impredecibles; no se puede extraer el libre albedrío de la impredecibilidad.*
    02:07:02 🌡️ *La segunda ley de la termodinámica, basada en la impredecibilidad a nivel molecular, es determinista y fundamental.*
    02:12:30 🐜 *La complejidad emergente no implica la existencia del libre albedrío; no cambia la naturaleza de los componentes fundamentales.*
    02:19:08 🕰️ *Los efectos cuánticos son estadísticamente insignificantes y no operan a nivel macroscópico en entornos biológicos ruidosos.*
    02:22:22 🧠 *El mecanismo subyacente de la mecánica cuántica es completamente determinista, incluso si las medidas resultantes son probabilísticas, lo que demuestra que la indeterminación es una ilusión.*
    02:25:37 🌍 *La ilusión del libre albedrío permite a los seres humanos funcionar efectivamente en la sociedad, pero no es necesario creer en el libre albedrío para actuar éticamente.*
    02:28:43 🧠 *La plasticidad neuronal y la comprensión de cómo cambian las circunstancias y el entorno pueden ayudarnos a mejorar como individuos y sociedad sin necesidad de libre albedrío.*
    02:42:20 ⚖️ *La retribución y el castigo pueden ser reemplazados por enfoques más efectivos, como el aislamiento o cuarentena de individuos peligrosos, sin la necesidad de considerar el libre albedrío moral.*
    02:45:31 🇸🇪 *Escandinavia ofrece ejemplos de sociedades que funcionan de manera ética y efectiva sin depender de la creencia en el libre albedrío moral, demostrando que es posible una convivencia pacífica y justa sin castigos severos.*
    02:45:44 🇳🇴 *La cultura escandinava tiene una respuesta racional a la criminalidad, en lugar de desear venganza, buscan evitar que los criminales reincidan.*
    02:46:54 🌍 *Entender cómo funciona el mundo es esencial para lograr un cambio real; no depende de la fuerza de voluntad individual, sino de cambiar las circunstancias.*
    02:48:50 📚 *Los logros pueden ser reconocidos y celebrados sin necesidad de elogiar a la persona, lo importante es inspirar a otros y reconocer los logros en sí mismos.*
    02:54:13 🤝 *La única conclusión moral es que nadie tiene más derecho que otro a que se atiendan sus necesidades y deseos, promoviendo la igualdad y el altruismo efectivo.*
    02:55:48 📖 *El progreso implica que en el futuro se maravillarán de lo que aún no sabemos, y la ignorancia es parte esencial de la exploración y el avance continuo.*
    Made with HARPA AI

  • @Sparkydr07
    @Sparkydr07 Рік тому +2

    This is, in my pre determined opinion the most fascinating talk I've heard

  • @sylviaowega3839
    @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому +2

    This a great interview. It in fact helped me fortify my opinion that free will is a mere dilution,
    and that the entire universe with it’s extreme complexities of our consciousness, quantum mechanics and evolution behave in a deterministic fashion. It is very liberating to be aware that free will doesn’t exist, as it has also liberated me from hate, misunderstandings and help mitigate any urge I have to invoke revenge with those who have wronged me.

    • @elviscotena2046
      @elviscotena2046 11 місяців тому

      If you did feel anger and revenge, wouldn’t that be determined too?

    • @sylviaowega3839
      @sylviaowega3839 11 місяців тому +1

      @@elviscotena2046 Yes, it definitely would. Best be aware of if.

  • @ColinChristie1
    @ColinChristie1 Рік тому +6

    I grew up on the Time-Life series too. The Nature series and the Science series. They were amazing!

  • @zumpano33
    @zumpano33 Рік тому +2

    I was looking forward to Determined with some skepticism but kept with it, its beautiful writing, often witty, encouraging me on. I'm almost done, seeing the world differently and, as Lawrence says, in a hopeful, upbeat way. Sapolsky's book deserves legendary status.

    • @verycoldhardybles790
      @verycoldhardybles790 Рік тому +2

      Those professors are lost.
      Saying that past determines the future is like saying that the tail is wagging the dog :D.
      There is no past and no future. There is eternal now. When bigbang happened, it was now. And is now now.

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому

      Without God you are truly lost. If you are making these poor souls your false gods then surely you are lost with prejudice. I happen to KNOW without a shadow of a doubt that God is very real. If you don't believe that's OK. All I will say is " I know something that you don't know". Oh well!

    • @verycoldhardybles790
      @verycoldhardybles790 Рік тому

      @@garychartrand7378 we can affect only past, not future

    • @chuckleezodiac24
      @chuckleezodiac24 Рік тому

      @@garychartrand7378 right on, bro. you know what you know and that he doesn't know what he knows or doesn't know or what you know, you know?

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому

      @@chuckleezodiac24 Thank you. I grog it perfectly. YOU have the gift of accurate observation. Bless you 🙏❤️

  • @philipsmith7904
    @philipsmith7904 Рік тому +6

    The best we can hope to be is a reasonably adjusted neurotic .

    • @luvibugi
      @luvibugi 3 місяці тому

      you have a whimsically realist view that’s oddly inspiring lol so thank you i love that

  • @sylviaowega3839
    @sylviaowega3839 Рік тому

    That you Lawrence for probably giving the world this interview with whom in my opinion is one of the 3 greatest thinkers, with whom includes, Robert. It is very informative and educational , and an effective way for getting people their feet wet in determinism.

  • @fernando_magalhaes
    @fernando_magalhaes 11 місяців тому +5

    It's so exciting and refreshing to hear 2 brilliant minds talking about a fascinating and controversial topic. Thank you both 🙏

  • @alisonvangestel7878
    @alisonvangestel7878 9 місяців тому

    I also liked very much the concept of "science" in place of religion and/or God. The word religion derives from a Latin word "religare", which means to hold back, or prevent further movement. My father was my mentor, I was the 5th of 8 children. My dad was a doctor who brought me into this world. He didn't deliver any of my other siblings. He and I had (and still have ) a connection that knows no bounds. He passed in 2003 at age 92.

  • @thewillsfamilyaccount6486
    @thewillsfamilyaccount6486 Рік тому +5

    Very interesting.. Even though I am a Christian.. I like to hear other peoples views!

  • @johnrussel4483
    @johnrussel4483 Рік тому

    Thank you Lawrence Krauss for presenting us this brilliant man ! Coming from a french part of the world, I wouldn't had that chance elsewhere..

  • @AlexReyn888
    @AlexReyn888 Рік тому +4

    1. It is logical to isolate people with “unlucky brains” not for 2-3 years, but for life or until we find a way to fix their brains.
    2. It is logical that if a procedure that allows identifying “unlucky brains” is found, all people should undergo it every year.
    3. It is logical that “unlucky brains” should be quarantined in advance, and not based on the results of crimes.
    Welcome to utopia!

  • @beefandbarley
    @beefandbarley Рік тому +2

    Thanks Lawrence, thanks Robert. Great conversation, thanks for sharing.

  • @vladimirmartyanov2122
    @vladimirmartyanov2122 Рік тому +3

    So, fifty minutes into the conversation Lawrence finally asks the question "What do you mean by free will?", Sapolsky completely dodges the question, and they continue to discuss an undefined concept for two more hours. Not what I expected from two of the most renowned scientists of today.

    • @ruprecht9997
      @ruprecht9997 Рік тому +1

      A lot of those talking for a living end up having so much to say that content is thinned out almost to zero.

    • @yoannycorominas221
      @yoannycorominas221 7 місяців тому

      They can't talk about something that not exist....

    • @theofficialness578
      @theofficialness578 6 місяців тому

      It’s undefinable, all the definitions are based on intuition. I feel that alone disproves the notion.

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 9 місяців тому

    Responsibility and Behavior: Epigenetics; Evolution, we can change if we want.Thank you Lawrence Krause and Robert Sapolsky for a great provocative conversation.

  • @cacasacchi79
    @cacasacchi79 Рік тому +6

    Krauss asks a question. Krauss answers it. Sapolsky eventually is given space to briefly comment.

  • @carlharmeling512
    @carlharmeling512 9 місяців тому +1

    The benefit to be derived from this ‘no free will principle’ is the dismantling of the two most pernicious personality constructs in human cognition; the guilt complex and the resentment obsession. To the extent it can be made to operate psychologically it will free the individual from the need for the resolution of these pathologies.

  • @Geeserunner
    @Geeserunner Рік тому +5

    It was really lovely to watch them laugh together about Time Life books.

  • @beldonhuang
    @beldonhuang Рік тому +2

    Absolutely interesting talk, just like Robert himself! Besides this interview, I also watched and did a video based on his TED Talk "The Biology of Our Best and Worst Selves", which is just as amazing as this interview

  • @rohanwallis1659
    @rohanwallis1659 Рік тому +4

    Loved this podcast the most although I don't feel like I had much choice!!

  • @VioletACordy
    @VioletACordy Рік тому +1

    🔆🌈🌲🌳🌳THANK YOU, DR. KRAUSS + DR.SAPOLSKY, THANK YOU FOR THE GOOD YOU DO🌸🌸Also, thank you for this delightful, brilliant and utterly vital and important interview ~ pow-wow😊”Robert Sapolsky: The Illusion of Free Will” ~ Professor Sapolsky, I have only read 3 of your FASCINATING and WONDERFUL books🌷🌷May G-D Bless you and everyone whom you love and cherish. 🦋🦋Shalom ~ violet a.c. (Toronto ~ Australia) 🌲🌳🦚PS Thank G-D that your VIDEO - LECTURES are on UA-cam🌲

  • @ataraxia7439
    @ataraxia7439 Рік тому +6

    I would do anything for Sapolskys view to be the mainstream default position. So much hatred and cruelty and suffering could be avoided. We could really build a society around an ideal of understanding and uplifting everyone regardless of who they are or what they’ve done and treating each other with kindness.

    • @waterkingdavid
      @waterkingdavid Рік тому +1

      Well said. Especially now when there is such enormous divisiveness and hatred everywhere.

    • @dharmaqueen7877
      @dharmaqueen7877 Рік тому +1

      The sentiment of all dictators.

    • @ataraxia7439
      @ataraxia7439 Рік тому

      @dharmaqueen7877
      ? Sorry I’m not sure I understand what you mean. I didn’t mean I wanted to force my value and beliefs onto every one regardless of consequence to them and their well-being. Just that I think it would be immensely positive if people had this perspective the same way I think it would be immensely positive if everyone was not racist.

    • @dharmaqueen7877
      @dharmaqueen7877 Рік тому

      @@ataraxia7439 You did say you would do anything for his point of view to be the default. Did you not mean it?

    • @ataraxia7439
      @ataraxia7439 Рік тому

      @@dharmaqueen7877 Sorry for this misunderstanding. It's a phrase in my culture that doesn't mean literally anything. I would do a lot for it though loll

  • @noellecuisine8912
    @noellecuisine8912 3 місяці тому

    What a wonderful and spacious interview thank you so much for the discussion!

  • @JusticieForMayelaAlvarez
    @JusticieForMayelaAlvarez Рік тому +11

    This man is definitely one of my living heroes.

  • @thomasmathew1324
    @thomasmathew1324 9 місяців тому

    Oh My goodness...I loved this conversation....Really enlightening. The criticality of the role played by Epigenetics was a revelation indeed...

  • @itsureishotout-itshotterin3985

    Damn, guys, that was a tremendous discussion of topics I would NEVER think about otherwise. A great space to find myself in for an hour or so. Thank you both.

  • @rachelthompson9324
    @rachelthompson9324 Рік тому

    " Reason is the slave of passion." I love that quote. It explains why I keep writing and publishing novels nobody reads but I keep writing them anyway. My reason is that writing is my passion.

    • @danstoica2824
      @danstoica2824 Рік тому

      Well, there are different reasons and passions for different individuals. Through consciousness and awareness we are better or through the lack of their quality we are weaker. So people have different qualities and have different health conditions. But everything is transformable through consciousness and awareness. Change can come sooner or later and sometimes not as we expect or as we wish. We have to be honest with ourselves and we have to look for honesty in the people we have relationships with, or in those we meet in life. So passion is determined by our way of reasoning and not the other way around.

  • @ferrellms
    @ferrellms Рік тому +3

    Krauss keeps talking about himself and it slows things down - let the guest do the talking

  • @stewartjones2173
    @stewartjones2173 Рік тому +2

    I listened for a while with their backslapping congratufest but couldn't wait for them gorging on Great helpings of You Tube to get to the point.

  • @awal7212
    @awal7212 11 місяців тому +3

    Since discovering Sapolsky's explanation of freewill a few years ago, has allowed me to understand my dad's anger and sometimes violent behaviour during my childhood and adolescence. My mother and I used to talk a lot about him and wonder why he behaved the way that he did, but we had no answers. It's only since I recently discovered my dad's extremely traumatic childhood and many other negative life-changing events he experienced, that I have been able to understand and therefore forgive him. He never talked about his childhood or indulged in self-pity. He kept his feelings and thought suppressed.
    Three days before he died quite young of a heart attack, we were sat together and out of the blue he turned to me and said,
    "I couldn't help the way I've been." Instinctively, I knew those words were heartfelt and I said , "It's ok dad' and he shortly after fell asleep, which is the last time I saw him alive.
    How true and profound were those words. He was racked with guilt over his behaviour, but I knew that he was basically a good, but damaged man. This discussion between two great minds has clarified and solidified my own thoughts about human behaviour. Thank you

    • @jimosborne2
      @jimosborne2 11 місяців тому +1

      Interesting that this discussion allowed you to gain such insight into your dad. I arrived at a similar insight about my father listening to Gabor Mate and Steve Schwartz.

  • @radavisjr41
    @radavisjr41 Рік тому +2

    Professor Sapolsky is a legend. This was fascinating. I watched the entire thing. Lawrence just needs to shut up more.

    • @garychartrand7378
      @garychartrand7378 Рік тому

      Only a legend in his (and apparently your) mind. His ideology is wrong because it is based on an assumption that is not true - that there is no God.
      I KNOW that God IS. I have been having a very close personal relationship with God for 16 years now. He has performed miracles through me with WITNESSES and many more without witnesses. If you don't believe in God then YOU have created a reality in which God doesn't exist FOR YOU in spite of the fact that He/She/It DOES exist.
      I just posted a comment. Please read it.

  • @СергейДядькин-я5ф

    Lawrence Krauss tried to remember the title of Tim Palmer's book "The Primacy of Doubt: From Quantum Physics to Climate Change, How the Science of Uncertainty Can Help Us Understand Our Chaotic World"

  • @claudioramirez8255
    @claudioramirez8255 Рік тому +1

    Brilliant and enlightening dialogue. Hope to be able to catch the next, when the two Masters are in the same room!

  • @Luke-gq7du
    @Luke-gq7du Рік тому +16

    The Lawrence Krauss podcast featuring guests that occasionally speak

    • @Lobishomem
      @Lobishomem Рік тому +5

      That are occasionally “allowed” to speak.

    • @chuckleezodiac24
      @chuckleezodiac24 Рік тому +1

      don't blame LK. he can't help it. that's the way God made him.

  • @frankiephenomanal
    @frankiephenomanal Рік тому

    Loving how Sapolsky has been featuring on a lot of podcasts recently. We're spoilt 👌🏽

  • @pennywiseetc3020
    @pennywiseetc3020 Рік тому +31

    This guy is a brilliant mind and a master teacher

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas Рік тому

      Brilliant and lacklustre are RELATIVE. 😉
      Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱

    • @chuckleezodiac24
      @chuckleezodiac24 Рік тому +1

      he learned from the famous philosophical genius known as Charles Manson that we're all just products of society.

  • @PreachRevolution
    @PreachRevolution 11 місяців тому +1

    "Reason is a slave of passion", "Clinical depression what is it? -It's a pathological failure of the ability to rationalize away a reality"... this is such a very important conversation!!! THANK YOU!!

  • @runco-vr5ym
    @runco-vr5ym Рік тому +172

    Let the guest talk bro

    • @thefamilydog3278
      @thefamilydog3278 11 місяців тому +13

      No shit! I’ve been skipping through the beginning 10 seconds at a time, and without fail it’s always the host just blathering on and on…

    • @ZiadSJennis
      @ZiadSJennis 11 місяців тому +1

      😂

    • @davidciesluk2433
      @davidciesluk2433 11 місяців тому +8

      Poor Larry is so over matched, he can barely complete a sentence. It's aggravating.

    • @robertbentley3589
      @robertbentley3589 11 місяців тому +10

      Loves to hear himself. Gets boring.

    • @mindsigh4
      @mindsigh4 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@davidciesluk2433Heimlich maneuver comes to mind 😎
      like he's driving round a parking lot looking for h space, he signals but midpark changes his mind...
      ... several times

  • @bhupindertube
    @bhupindertube 10 місяців тому +1

    DISAGREE - You're missing the deterrence from the equation. Deterrence is the elephant in the room & not Daniel Dennett. Yes, genes (etc. ++) controls people's destiny, so no free will. However, if you remove hard punishment (deterrence) from the equation because it wasn't their fault in the first place, then far more people would do the wrong things. It's because the punishment plays a role to deter people from doing the wrong things. Punishment is basically calculated in people brains using their genes, etc. and helps decide the direction of their actions. Similar, rewards has the opposite effect. So, if you'd remove punishments & rewards, you're in effect changing the equation, and the same person would behave differently without their own will (no free will). Sweden now has one of the highest crime rates in the world and I argue it's partly because the deterrence isn't as strong. And in contrast, Singapore is one of the safest places on earth because the deterrence is very strong.

  • @Ivan_chepaykin
    @Ivan_chepaykin Рік тому +7

    Fascinating and enlightening discussion as always come away with something new.
    Just wondering, Mr Krauss, will you have a dialogue with Brian greene as part of this origins podcast in the foreseeable future? You two are my absolute favorites when it comes to science communication and sort of breaking down these concepts for a lay person like myself and I'd love to watch the two of you discuss fascinating scientific concepts and explore each other's origins I know you've been friends for many years and have worked on projects together yeah with the world science festival and stuff

  • @BolasDaGrk
    @BolasDaGrk 10 місяців тому

    Just an amazing conversation, and one cannot post this enough time to do it justice!