Debunking Facilitated Communication 2

Debunking Facilitated Communication 2 - from believers to understanding the phenonmenom

[@H4CK41D]

thanks for uploading this!

[@crimeandcrafting]

Facilitators can be bad at facilitating. Was that part of the study

[@reillyyllier]

facilitators are all bad at facilitating because it was all fake science

[@triniroma4957]

in part one is the test

[@crimeandcrafting]

@@triniroma4957 that didn’t answer my question. They DONT consider that some people are bad facilitators. It’s kind of a key thing to consider 🙄

[@shrodingerscat4191]

They knew what 5hey were doing, they are very good manipulators

[@MrRaulstrnad]

the thought that there is an outside chance that the faciliators consciously accused parents of sexual abuse thus ruining families is too horrible to contemplate most interpreters of the fc phenomenom feel that faciliators unconsciously not consciously manipulated the responses of the autistic kids

[@shrodingerscat4191]

@@MrRaulstrnad it would be nice if that were true

[@MrRaulstrnad]

@@shrodingerscat4191 you certainly have an interesting interpretation of what happened and i respect your interpretation ...the implications of this however are very disturbing but unfortunately in some cases it might be true

[@shrodingerscat4191]

@@MrRaulstrnad agreed

[@justinjaeger1554]

I really don’t think they knew. Look up “Ideamotor phenomenon”