100% They are a clear danger to us all...Hope someone sends this video and their appalling . dire treatment of their customers..calling them names... weirdos...assaulting them.... to SAINSBURY'S HEAD OFFICE. This is truly disgusting, appalling and they are a total professional disgrace.. This pair need sacking immediately!
just create a linked in, say you have an sia license, and you will have companies bs you about how great they are, and they have at least 48hrs a week available for you. just shy of three months later, they'll withhold work from you, and employ the next monkey on indeed with an sia. No one learns f all, so it's an endless cycle of 99% of gormless cnuts.
Nice to know the police respond to the concerns of corporations. Impressively quick response. My neighbour's shed was burgled several days ago, they didn't bother to come out until seven hours later. The only people breaking the law here were the security guards, neither of whom were wearing their SIA badges.
@FiendPhotoIf people can be identified then it can be seen as a data protection breach, though that is highly unlikely, the biggest issue would be publishing the video and putting the information online, and that can be a breach of GDPR regulations.
@@geo33223 correct, the organisation and anyone mentioned on the screen may not like it, but I think that it'd only be legally an issue if it was security services type info, otherwise it's the photographer's data and they are free to publish it, sample it into a music video, delete it, whatever they want.
HR depts normally spend tens of thousands protecting the bad ones - probably a promotion to behind scenes is in order - telling whoppas is a well established corporate stategy for which they need idiots like that
Lets hope they now know what a pair of lying ***** the security guards are. Imagine these two with a vulnerable person, they can lie like that, they can stitch people up . Also I can not see any SIA licences on display, which if true means they are breaking the law. Section 9 of the PSIA (please note condition (a) does not apply if you have a Key Holding licence): You must wear the licence where it can be seen at all times when engaging in any licensable conduct : unless
i think as a society we need to get rid of bad security that are basically thick thugs ! the standards need a complete overhaul and the bad ones should all be fired
Just say if they care about data protection then they'd make more effort to protect it.. they didn't do their duty to prevent someone taking a picture of it in the first place so they've caused a data breach, not you
@@7king8debs79 I think you'll find that it is... GDPR is the responsibility of the company and its employees. They need to make the effort to protect sensitive data. They can do that by turning the screen off or blocking it from an implied right of access to the general public entering the store
If they say you've taken a picture of a screen, in breach of the DPA, then _they_ (as data collectors) have committed the breach and not you (after all, even if you simply looked at the screen, the same breach would have occurred), so this security guy is essentially admitting (on behalf of his employers) to a data breach. He's admitting to sensitive data being on display to the public . . . and they have 72 hours to report this breach to the ICO.
Hence why you are not allowed to film in there, which means Reggie became a data handler and is subject to the same rules as the supermarket. Just think if Reggie had not used his camera, as he shouldn't have done due to it being private property inside, it wouldn't have caused any issues, but because he did, guess what? It did cause issues. So where does the blame lie, with the supermarket which is a private building and to film inside, consent is required, or the guy with a camera who wasn't allowed to film in the first place? Shouldn't be too difficult to figure it out...
@@tonyb1223 _”Just think if Reggie had not used his camera, as he shouldn't have done due to it being private property inside, it wouldn't have caused any issues”_ Er . . . no . . . regardless of whether someone has a camera or not, if information is being displayed to the public the data handler is in breach of GDPR not the person who sees it. So, if there is a screen which is viewable by the public, and it’s displaying - for example - an account number or passcode, then it doesn’t matter if someone makes mental note, scribbles it down on the back of their hand, photographs it or goes outside and makes a voice memo . . . the fact is the data handler allowed it to be viewable to the public. _”So where does the blame lie”_ As a data handler, the blame lies with the supermarket. _”the supermarket which is a private building”_ A private building, but a public place, which the public has free access to. _”and to film inside”_ As pointed out above, the filming aspect of the interaction is an irrelevancy . . . for example- would you be happy to have your private information on display, on a screen, inside a store, where any passing member of the public was free to view it, with your only caveat being no one was allowed to film it ? The answer is no. Even without a camera, if private information is on public display the data hander has breached GDPR.
@@tonyb1223 Wrong. No such law exists that explicity states, "unless express permission is given, it is not allowed". We live in the UK, where the law is, EVERYTHING is legal or assumed allowed, unless explicity stated. Could you imagine how long a contract for anything would be, if it had to list everything that is allowed?
@@davelordy I take it you missed the important part? If the information is for personal use, there would be no breach of GDPR, but if its published then there would be, and this is the factor you overlooked, because it was published, he breached GDPR, and that is the difference. So as much as you were on the right lines for someone who would only see the information and not publish it, thats fine, but the second it's published, it's not (or no longer for household use). Hence why filming can be restricted by the building owner as to stop this happening.
@@zigzagtoes Actually there is, it's a part of the human rights act, and as with article 10, you have to protect the rights of others, which basically means that you cannot trump another persons right, ie privacy for example, it means that Reggie failed to meet the criteria as laid down in article 10 when he is expressing his chosen freedom and as such can lead to the likes of the offence of public nuisance. Good photographers understand this and as such the reason why we don't het arrested or accosted everytime we go out, those who lack this knowledge and understanding, do.
Hey Reggie, in another situation like this I would always use the line that Data Protection act only applies to companies and organisations not to the individual member of the public. If you have seen a screen that is showing something that you shouldn't be able to see, then they have breached the act not you, and the act of filming it is purely evidence that the breach has occurred. Thanks to PTTP for this.
I got a bit wound up watching that. They follow kids around in those stores hoping to catch them stealing sweets then bring up kids to strengthen their arguments.
The main problem with these two, is they didn't want to engage or find anything out.. they'd already made their assumptions and conclusions before approaching and comment on been a weirdo shows that perfectly. Telling lies along and the inability to be civil, that's all I'm seeing.
re-training? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 how about give them some training to begin with. Believe me, the sia may deny it, but I tell you now (as will other decent guards) most are helped through the training. Until last year (maybe because of how vocal I and a few others are online directly to the sia), they even helped them through the tests - recently, the have been videoing "training centres" exam rooms to crackdown on the corruption. As a licensed guard, you can't even report this kind of c anonymously, they insist you highlight complaints via the sia portal. Like f am I going to do that and risk fall out with my employers, other potential employers etc. So I will keep bleating on, like this, until gov make it illegal to do so (thats currently being sneaked in as the OSB).
@@nicotoscani1707 seems like sarcasm, but unfortunately thats how some places operate. The number of untrained guards i have had to give a run down to in 5 mins is high.
Children? It is as legal to film/photograph children in public as it is adults, as long as the images are not indecent. The only issue can be the misunderstandings of others leading to a breach of the peace. A local FB page had a problem with this information and threatened me with all sorts, until I pointed out they all take photos of the local gala day parade.
You're totally on point mate as we spoke today. We have to do it differently. It's like my cameras from Liverpool are not back yet, it's suppression tactics of evidence. It's not going to happen like that again. Your video shows how security companies think they are untouchable when it comes to the public. They were both lying and covering up for each other. Possibly able to turn a blind eye I would not have them working together.
How do the security companies who train these idiots keep getting away with this? They must know by now that there are numerous recordings of THEIR employees making fools of themselves and the companies who hire them, all over the internet!!!!! Please ensure that a copy of this makes its way to corporate headquarters of Sainsbury's. Maybe nothing will happen, but maybe it will!!!!
Data protection is down to the company not the public. If they leave it to be seen by the public then they are the ones who have broken data protection laws, not Reggie. Very quick to accuse the public of breaking data protection when it is their responsibility to protect it.
Illegal detention (blocking the "exit"), lying, name calling, insinuating he's a pedo... I hope they get their asses handed to them in a proper court of law. I'm glad he has all this on video. Total corruption, and they would have erased the evidence. I hope you sued.
They honestly take statements over actual recordings? That’s the definition of corruption. That’s like saying your eyes are not seeing what they are seeing
Exactly all for the state meaning the crown's servants. Like they don't lie, or rape, or kill. Just yesterday the met put 1000 officers into off duty measures. Blackpool police, council, magistrates are amongst the most corrupt in the nation
No intelligence to handle the situation (that he created) in an amicable capacity, so defaulted to the worse situation so either bystanders would join in and gang up on reggie, or reggie would feel too embarassed to argue such a horrific accusation in public and would just disburse. Scum guard that a few s-heads need to share a n with, without consent.
4:40 that security guard keeps talking about taking pictures of children, someone needs to investigate that security guards personal life, maybe check his personal computer for pictures of children
My granny is in a wheelchair and sent me out to get her some knickers and condoms. I had her on videochat so that she could look and approve of the purchases. I didn't have a problem.
i had a security guard working at morrisons grab me from behind and physically drag me back into the store a couple of weeks ago because the electronic alarm went off as i walked through with a group of other shoppers, i punched him full on in the face then called the police, they came and looked at the CCTV and confirmed to the security guard that i had every right to punch him in the face to stop the assault that he was committing and then informed me that i can make a complaint for assault, security guards really need to start learning the law or they are risking their safety by going hands on with people.
May have made their day but by rights they should now lose their jobs and their badges. That was disgusting, how many peoples lives could these two ruin with that behaviour and lies.
@@ReggiePhoto Yeah there's an American auditor (SGV) who ususally goes live and all his footage goes to the cloud so if you're camera is seized/smashed etc. then all the evidence is there for you to download later!
Yes that will save the footage, but won't stop the devices being seized though. Yes it's one way to do it. I think Reggie was more concerned with the devices being seized, which for a UA-camr it's vitally important.
@stuartb4525 it's more being able to share the footage and let you the viewers and the public see the evidence before it escalates to a court. A friend got his devices taken of him and he was convicted without him being able to show his evidence and they still haven't given him his devices back. I've got many devices stashed of to get me back on the road filming that's not the issue it's the footage of any false allegations that is more important.
Do they not realise its them that would be commiting an offence under data protection if it was being left out in the open by them. Trying to get you to delete it is then tampering with evidence.
7:19 When the Palace nightclub was there, me and my mate Trigger used to climb over them railings, on to the roof next door, and get drunk on Diamond White. I miss 1992.
This behaviour needs to be looked into, utterly disgusting it makes my blood boil.Who trains these idiots??? Put a uniform of sorts on some people and they become tyrants using bullying tactics.Great interaction Reggie stay safe.your videos are most entertaining.🤣👍
Reminded me of the Viz comic strip "Robo Store Detective" - with the tagline "Shoplift and die, mother******s" Very funny and serious at the same time. Security guy saying you can't take a picture of their apparatus for taking pictures. Says you're breaking GDPR when to him you would have appeared to be acting as a private individual, whilst he was working for an organisation. On the more serious side, he blocked your path when you tried to leave and therefore assaulted you - leaving him open to be prosecuted. You should expect a public apology from a senior manager of Sainsburys as well as them saying that those 2 guards have been sacked.
😂😂 The little one with the wrong size jacket on is calling someone else strange😂😂when he clearly uses a tin opener to cut his hair.. now that is strange😂😂
So what the security "guard" is saying is that there has been a breach of data protection by Sainsbury's for not protecting the CCTV screens from public view. Are they reporting this to the ICO?
I live near this Sainsburys and the security in there are absolutely Dreadful always bullying and threatening customers making us feel like we are criminals that's why me my family and friends don't use it anymore,Discusting place!!!!
I wont be shopping in Sainburys again, just in case i meet an idiot like that... in fact at our local store its well know fot having your bike stolen and the bogs are floodlit with anti drug lights.. for last 10 years.. pretty rough.
I wish you told him when he said you're breaching GDPR by filming that screen, that they must be breaching it themselves then if data that's protected under GDPR is visible on it to anyone who walks past and has a quick look
'Taking a picture of data protection when there's kids on there, you sicko' @2.14 Security that stoop to that level at the first opportunity are the ones that need their hard drives checking the weirdos
Woah young guy fucked up by blocking exit
I think you'd of been tempted to give him a special kick there mate 😉
Did either of them have their blue SIA licence on display?
Who are you?
you should have waited for someone to come in
Reggie get them reported ,that's not right and then they lie afterwards.power trippers
What a couple of nutters. The younger guy must think he's Britain's hardest man.I think not.The 2 guards were making things worse. Keep safe Reggie.
100% They are a clear danger to us all...Hope someone sends this video and their appalling . dire treatment of their customers..calling them names... weirdos...assaulting them.... to SAINSBURY'S HEAD OFFICE. This is truly disgusting, appalling and they are a total professional disgrace.. This pair need sacking immediately!
Definitely a few candidates within a miile of everyone.
Young guy would
Old guy is a classic kiddie fiddler
Where do they find these absolute buffoons to hire as security. This is absolutely mind blowing
100% They are dangerous!
Makes a change they can speak English
This is so bad. Sainsbury's will sack them for this.
just create a linked in, say you have an sia license, and you will have companies bs you about how great they are, and they have at least 48hrs a week available for you. just shy of three months later, they'll withhold work from you, and employ the next monkey on indeed with an sia. No one learns f all, so it's an endless cycle of 99% of gormless cnuts.
its been on the news how security are being fast tracked through courses then being allowed to work so its no surprise this is happening
Nice to know the police respond to the concerns of corporations. Impressively quick response.
My neighbour's shed was burgled several days ago, they didn't bother to come out until seven hours later.
The only people breaking the law here were the security guards, neither of whom were wearing their SIA badges.
my mate was beaten and hospitalised, outside a shop with cctv took 3 days for them to turn up let the druggy off " because" he was in a bad mood"...
The trick is to say that either you come and stop this or I’m going to stop it myself and you aren’t going to like my solution.
Your neighbour did well to get a response the same day.
You're lucky, our burglary took 4 days to get a police call out
@@HisMagnificenceThen the police would probably try to arrest you for something instead of investigating the crime you’re reporting.
Out of control security that are clueless, running their mouths with BS
It's the organization's responsibility to provide the data protection - if the info is on display they are breaching it.
@FiendPhotoIf people can be identified then it can be seen as a data protection breach, though that is highly unlikely, the biggest issue would be publishing the video and putting the information online, and that can be a breach of GDPR regulations.
@@tonyb1223 GDPR is for organisation only is it not
@@geo33223 No, it covers everyone if its not for household (personal) use.
@@geo33223 correct, the organisation and anyone mentioned on the screen may not like it, but I think that it'd only be legally an issue if it was security services type info, otherwise it's the photographer's data and they are free to publish it, sample it into a music video, delete it, whatever they want.
@@geo33223No.
Self-employed and sole traders (so pretty much any auditor who gets paid by UA-cam etc.) are bound by it and the DPA too.
Why did that security guard keep talking about kids? Should we be worried about him looking at and zooming in on kids on the CCTV cameras?
YOU SHALL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS!!🙂
I agree, they look a couple of wrong'ns
In one breath he says “you can’t take pictures” followed by “it’s all on camera” lol they just can’t see the hypocrisy of it all lol
It's amazing how they act when they don't think they're being recorded
THESE 2 GOONS HAVE HAD NOTHING TO DO BUT STAND AROUND IN A PENN DAY IN DAY OUT! REGGIE SHOWS UP & LIKE VULTURES AROUND A CARCAS!!😏🙂
Defo mate
I was hoping Reggie would show them, just to see the expression on the clowns face change
Having both been recorded lying to protect each other it’s hard to see how they can continue in their job.
Exactly
Go and tell them to get back to work @@ukmeetthetyrants
Not to mention the totally illegal assault when he blocked Reggie from leaving.
HR depts normally spend tens of thousands protecting the bad ones - probably a promotion to behind scenes is in order - telling whoppas is a well established corporate stategy for which they need idiots like that
They will though.....there's only so many monkey's London Zoo can supply.
Lets hope they now know what a pair of lying ***** the security guards are.
Imagine these two with a vulnerable person, they can lie like that, they can stitch people up .
Also I can not see any SIA licences on display, which if true means they are breaking the law.
Section 9 of the PSIA (please note condition (a) does not apply if you have a Key Holding licence):
You must wear the licence where it can be seen at all times when engaging in any licensable conduct :
unless
Why are they just making things worse? Almost no problem existed until these guys start making it escalation
Boredom probably
They're security guards. They've failed in life
i think as a society we need to get rid of bad security that are basically thick thugs ! the standards need a complete overhaul and the bad ones should all be fired
This needs to be sent to Sainsbury’s head office
I just love that those two superberks have shown their lying idiocy to 44 thousand of Reggie’s viewers. How does it feel you goons ? 😂
TOP FLIGHT SECURITY! imagine taking your job at a supermarket this serious.
They will be sacked for this 100%.
Pair of complete spanners …. Their family will be proud 😂
Reggie breaching data protection? What about the company filming their customers - what’s that? Ridiculous people. Well done Reggie 👏
The people, are free it's us who pay for everything in this country. Anything with a boss, wages rules there heads are up there arses. Germany's
Data protection is their job, not ours.
If a guard ever blocks my path for no good reason, he'll be on the floor.
If the door won't open because it's no exit then why stand in front of you to block your path? Unless he's trying to instigate something
Exactly 💯
Spot on my friend 👍💯
"There's families with kids 'n that...". Oh bore off!
Security need sacking as does the lady manager.
Just say if they care about data protection then they'd make more effort to protect it.. they didn't do their duty to prevent someone taking a picture of it in the first place so they've caused a data breach, not you
That is not how that works.
@@7king8debs79 I think you'll find that it is... GDPR is the responsibility of the company and its employees. They need to make the effort to protect sensitive data. They can do that by turning the screen off or blocking it from an implied right of access to the general public entering the store
If they say you've taken a picture of a screen, in breach of the DPA, then _they_ (as data collectors) have committed the breach and not you (after all, even if you simply looked at the screen, the same breach would have occurred), so this security guy is essentially admitting (on behalf of his employers) to a data breach. He's admitting to sensitive data being on display to the public . . . and they have 72 hours to report this breach to the ICO.
Hence why you are not allowed to film in there, which means Reggie became a data handler and is subject to the same rules as the supermarket.
Just think if Reggie had not used his camera, as he shouldn't have done due to it being private property inside, it wouldn't have caused any issues, but because he did, guess what? It did cause issues.
So where does the blame lie, with the supermarket which is a private building and to film inside, consent is required, or the guy with a camera who wasn't allowed to film in the first place?
Shouldn't be too difficult to figure it out...
@@tonyb1223 _”Just think if Reggie had not used his camera, as he shouldn't have done due to it being private property inside, it wouldn't have caused any issues”_
Er . . . no . . . regardless of whether someone has a camera or not, if information is being displayed to the public the data handler is in breach of GDPR not the person who sees it. So, if there is a screen which is viewable by the public, and it’s displaying - for example - an account number or passcode, then it doesn’t matter if someone makes mental note, scribbles it down on the back of their hand, photographs it or goes outside and makes a voice memo . . . the fact is the data handler allowed it to be viewable to the public.
_”So where does the blame lie”_
As a data handler, the blame lies with the supermarket.
_”the supermarket which is a private building”_
A private building, but a public place, which the public has free access to.
_”and to film inside”_
As pointed out above, the filming aspect of the interaction is an irrelevancy . . . for example- would you be happy to have your private information on display, on a screen, inside a store, where any passing member of the public was free to view it, with your only caveat being no one was allowed to film it ? The answer is no.
Even without a camera, if private information is on public display the data hander has breached GDPR.
@@tonyb1223 Wrong. No such law exists that explicity states, "unless express permission is given, it is not allowed". We live in the UK, where the law is, EVERYTHING is legal or assumed allowed, unless explicity stated.
Could you imagine how long a contract for anything would be, if it had to list everything that is allowed?
@@davelordy I take it you missed the important part?
If the information is for personal use, there would be no breach of GDPR, but if its published then there would be, and this is the factor you overlooked, because it was published, he breached GDPR, and that is the difference.
So as much as you were on the right lines for someone who would only see the information and not publish it, thats fine, but the second it's published, it's not (or no longer for household use). Hence why filming can be restricted by the building owner as to stop this happening.
@@zigzagtoes Actually there is, it's a part of the human rights act, and as with article 10, you have to protect the rights of others, which basically means that you cannot trump another persons right, ie privacy for example, it means that Reggie failed to meet the criteria as laid down in article 10 when he is expressing his chosen freedom and as such can lead to the likes of the offence of public nuisance.
Good photographers understand this and as such the reason why we don't het arrested or accosted everytime we go out, those who lack this knowledge and understanding, do.
That was unbelievable. Fair play to you Reg
Hey Reggie, in another situation like this I would always use the line that Data Protection act only applies to companies and organisations not to the individual member of the public. If you have seen a screen that is showing something that you shouldn't be able to see, then they have breached the act not you, and the act of filming it is purely evidence that the breach has occurred. Thanks to PTTP for this.
Just for their information Reggie you need a judge to tell you to delete not even police can tell you😊
+ his delete button is broken 😂😂😂👍
well they didnt know much really did they, just how to abuse a member of the public then lie to cover themselves.
Reggie man, you are a warrior. We all benefit from the work you do.
I got a bit wound up watching that. They follow kids around in those stores hoping to catch them stealing sweets then bring up kids to strengthen their arguments.
It still amazes me how bull boy security spout the law with absolute belief in their knowledge! They need more education reggie.
The main problem with these two, is they didn't want to engage or find anything out.. they'd already made their assumptions and conclusions before approaching and comment on been a weirdo shows that perfectly. Telling lies along and the inability to be civil, that's all I'm seeing.
Shocking, I'm glad you're exposing this behaviour, good advise there as well Reggie, cheers buddy
💜✌️
Sainsbury’s have cctv cameras filming kids all the while. Does that make the company a bunch of weirdos?
I wish I could see their faces when they see this😂😂😂😂😂
Data protection 😂😂😂
Protect your data then you muppet… that is your data breach and Reggie has every right to record then report the breach 😂😂😂
Both those guys should be fired.
"DATA PROTECTION" 😂😂😂😂😂😂
CLUELESS
Scary how many times security mentioned children,makes you wonder why.
Kid's got a haircut straight out of Vic and Bob's Night Out.
A bit of re-training for the security staff is required. These pair of muppets need educating.
Sacking need they do
re-training? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 how about give them some training to begin with. Believe me, the sia may deny it, but I tell you now (as will other decent guards) most are helped through the training. Until last year (maybe because of how vocal I and a few others are online directly to the sia), they even helped them through the tests - recently, the have been videoing "training centres" exam rooms to crackdown on the corruption.
As a licensed guard, you can't even report this kind of c anonymously, they insist you highlight complaints via the sia portal. Like f am I going to do that and risk fall out with my employers, other potential employers etc.
So I will keep bleating on, like this, until gov make it illegal to do so (thats currently being sneaked in as the OSB).
@@nicotoscani1707 seems like sarcasm, but unfortunately thats how some places operate. The number of untrained guards i have had to give a run down to in 5 mins is high.
Children? It is as legal to film/photograph children in public as it is adults, as long as the images are not indecent. The only issue can be the misunderstandings of others leading to a breach of the peace. A local FB page had a problem with this information and threatened me with all sorts, until I pointed out they all take photos of the local gala day parade.
You're totally on point mate as we spoke today. We have to do it differently. It's like my cameras from Liverpool are not back yet, it's suppression tactics of evidence. It's not going to happen like that again. Your video shows how security companies think they are untouchable when it comes to the public. They were both lying and covering up for each other. Possibly able to turn a blind eye I would not have them working together.
👍👊
The security chap telling lies like that. Naughty naughty no one likes a liar.
How do the security companies who train these idiots keep getting away with this? They must know by now that there are numerous recordings of THEIR employees making fools of themselves and the companies who hire them, all over the internet!!!!!
Please ensure that a copy of this makes its way to corporate headquarters of Sainsbury's. Maybe nothing will happen, but maybe it will!!!!
Mark needs to visit these guys.
👍
Data protection is down to the company not the public. If they leave it to be seen by the public then they are the ones who have broken data protection laws, not Reggie. Very quick to accuse the public of breaking data protection when it is their responsibility to protect it.
Them 2 need sacking,and they should know the law
Illegal detention (blocking the "exit"), lying, name calling, insinuating he's a pedo... I hope they get their asses handed to them in a proper court of law. I'm glad he has all this on video. Total corruption, and they would have erased the evidence. I hope you sued.
That place is grim dude. I've only been to BlackPool once and that is exactly as i remember it absolutely depressing.
it is a absolute depressing place awful place even in summer
6% of burglary crime investigated...yet they come for a photo guy...pathetic
you should have ruffled the little power trip mans combe over
Effing Disgraceful they should both be Sacked.
And lose their free badges from the government job centre, that they think puts them above others.
They honestly take statements over actual recordings? That’s the definition of corruption. That’s like saying your eyes are not seeing what they are seeing
Exactly all for the state meaning the crown's servants. Like they don't lie, or rape, or kill. Just yesterday the met put 1000 officers into off duty measures. Blackpool police, council, magistrates are amongst the most corrupt in the nation
Those security guards stand looking at screens all day, watching the kids!
I found it weird that he kinda accused you of taking pics of kids as that in itself needs questioning why he would even think that.
No intelligence to handle the situation (that he created) in an amicable capacity, so defaulted to the worse situation so either bystanders would join in and gang up on reggie, or reggie would feel too embarassed to argue such a horrific accusation in public and would just disburse.
Scum guard that a few s-heads need to share a n with, without consent.
The original Mothercare doormen, the pair of them couldn't fight sleep 😂😂
We need a 'data protection' counter in the top right.
Mass audit needed Reggie: Marti, Ryan, etc etc
Security! Bet Reggie didn't feel secure with those two weirdos
4:40 that security guard keeps talking about taking pictures of children, someone needs to investigate that security guards personal life, maybe check his personal computer for pictures of children
Young lad looks like he escaped from a lego playset with that hair.
When I grow up I want a big yellow jacket.
The dude who lied needs his hsrdrive searching
Next time in Blackpool, I think I'll need some shopping for the days I'm there.
People with hoods up leaving as he says "You shouldn't be wearing a hood."😂
My granny is in a wheelchair and sent me out to get her some knickers and condoms. I had her on videochat so that she could look and approve of the purchases.
I didn't have a problem.
🤣🤣🤣
i had a security guard working at morrisons grab me from behind and physically drag me back into the store a couple of weeks ago because the electronic alarm went off as i walked through with a group of other shoppers, i punched him full on in the face then called the police, they came and looked at the CCTV and confirmed to the security guard that i had every right to punch him in the face to stop the assault that he was committing and then informed me that i can make a complaint for assault, security guards really need to start learning the law or they are risking their safety by going hands on with people.
Security highest educated people in the uk 😂😂😂😂
Haha.
When I went for my badge, the instructor said if you can spell your name, you'll pass.
What a waste of my week..
Security these days are jokers
Wow Sainsbury’s need to have a word with these 2 and send them for retraining
Absolute jobsworths. It's embarrassing really. Stay safe reggie
You made their day, it gave them something exciting to do for once.
EXACTLY!!🤗🙂
May have made their day but by rights they should now lose their jobs and their badges. That was disgusting, how many peoples lives could these two ruin with that behaviour and lies.
I contacted Sainsburys via twitter last month. The head office had no problem with in store filming as lomg as you did not hassle anyone
A young man working in security? that's a job for old men really, unless he has a learning difficulty!
Best to record direct to the Cloud.
I'm unfamiliar with that is it easy
@@ReggiePhoto Yeah there's an American auditor (SGV) who ususally goes live and all his footage goes to the cloud so if you're camera is seized/smashed etc. then all the evidence is there for you to download later!
@@ReggiePhotodo some research its not that difficult
Yes that will save the footage, but won't stop the devices being seized though. Yes it's one way to do it. I think Reggie was more concerned with the devices being seized, which for a UA-camr it's vitally important.
@stuartb4525 it's more being able to share the footage and let you the viewers and the public see the evidence before it escalates to a court. A friend got his devices taken of him and he was convicted without him being able to show his evidence and they still haven't given him his devices back. I've got many devices stashed of to get me back on the road filming that's not the issue it's the footage of any false allegations that is more important.
Do they not realise its them that would be commiting an offence under data protection if it was being left out in the open by them. Trying to get you to delete it is then tampering with evidence.
No, they don't understand that because it's way beyond their intelligence.
I did hear they were going to make a new Dumb and Dumber film in the local supermarket! 😂
Well at least one of them has the Jim Carey haircut already ;-)
7:19 When the Palace nightclub was there, me and my mate Trigger used to climb over them railings, on to the roof next door, and get drunk on Diamond White. I miss 1992.
Both good representation of the company thick as planks
Sainsbury’s can sell items at 2 different prices robbing barstools
Well done, Sainsbury Hmm think that needs to be sent to head office on how not to act as security 😂 you do realise the camera doesn’t lie 😂
Fantastic job! Thanks for sharing great advice about cameras. 🇺🇲✌️🇺🇲
If this donut is worried about data protection then he should’ve protected the data better😂
Hence the reason you cannot film inside in the first place, no filming, no publishing, no GDPR breach.
Karma is coming like a tidal wave, tic tock lol
This behaviour needs to be looked into, utterly disgusting it makes my blood boil.Who trains these idiots??? Put a uniform of sorts on some people and they become tyrants using bullying tactics.Great interaction Reggie stay safe.your videos are most entertaining.🤣👍
The old guy was very aggressive. What a pair of jokers😲
4:26 the timing on that 😂
You couldn't write it mate
Reminded me of the Viz comic strip "Robo Store Detective" - with the tagline "Shoplift and die, mother******s"
Very funny and serious at the same time. Security guy saying you can't take a picture of their apparatus for taking pictures. Says you're breaking GDPR when to him you would have appeared to be acting as a private individual, whilst he was working for an organisation.
On the more serious side, he blocked your path when you tried to leave and therefore assaulted you - leaving him open to be prosecuted.
You should expect a public apology from a senior manager of Sainsburys as well as them saying that those 2 guards have been sacked.
😂😂 The little one with the wrong size jacket on is calling someone else strange😂😂when he clearly uses a tin opener to cut his hair.. now that is strange😂😂
What they fail to realise is ..
.' The camera never lies'
It is NOT against the law to take pictures of kids, end of, I hope Sainsbury's are proud of their staff
I would of taken a photo of his haircut, because no one would believe it.
Brilliant video showing how cranky the world is we now live in.
These people are so deluded, bet they had every jab going as well.
So what the security "guard" is saying is that there has been a breach of data protection by Sainsbury's for not protecting the CCTV screens from public view. Are they reporting this to the ICO?
Typical clueless security tools.
so that security guard should turn off all the cameras every time a child enters the store, otherwise he's taking pictures of all the children
I live near this Sainsburys and the security in there are absolutely Dreadful always bullying and threatening customers making us feel like we are criminals that's why me my family and friends don't use it anymore,Discusting place!!!!
Many people have said the same thing sad really
I wont be shopping in Sainburys again, just in case i meet an idiot like that... in fact at our local store its well know fot having your bike stolen and the bogs are floodlit with anti drug lights.. for last 10 years.. pretty rough.
I wish you told him when he said you're breaching GDPR by filming that screen, that they must be breaching it themselves then if data that's protected under GDPR is visible on it to anyone who walks past and has a quick look
The guy thinks data protection is a reason to phone police 😂. Clearly doesn't understand these laws only apply to companies
'Taking a picture of data protection when there's kids on there, you sicko' @2.14
Security that stoop to that level at the first opportunity are the ones that need their hard drives checking the weirdos
Young guy will be meeting someone else in real life that will put his lights out 😢