Officer Trespasses and Is Caught by Civilian
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 бер 2021
- The first 1000 people to use the link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/audittheaudit03211
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Facebook: bit.ly/3fKIZF8
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Audit the Audit 2: bit.ly/2CD2b6j
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellifyagency.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: • Video
nikki Norris’ channel: / @bitcorn420
Sources:
Flatland County Detention Center Jail Roster- bit.ly/3sO7l7L
Oliver v. United States- bit.ly/3e6BAm6
United States v. Dunn- bit.ly/30kgOrj
Florida v. Jardines- bit.ly/2ZJzoIV
Kentucky v. King- bit.ly/2MEM3d9
Montana Code § 45-6-203- bit.ly/3e0z6ph
Montana Code § 45-2-101- bit.ly/3reXaZp
Montana Code § 45-6-201- bit.ly/2PsCUWi
City of Bozeman v. Lehrer- bit.ly/3raPGXx
The first 1000 people to use the link will get a free trial of Skillshare Premium Membership: skl.sh/audittheaudit03211
Just claimed it 👍
Uploaded 8mins ago
Comment posted 7 hours ago
Math is weird.
Fyi fair use is a defence against copyright but only after you are sued.
7 hours but this video started 12 mins ago
I love how the cop felony trespasses with a firearm.. by entering property of which he had no warrant.
Then when the guy says I don't answer questions the cop acts like he's been insulted.
I'm not a lawyer, but I was told by a police officer, if a cop comes on your property without a warrant he can be shot like any other trespasser.
As trespassing with a firearm is a felony.
I've heard some states are ridiculous, even requiring the family to retreat from their own home during a robbery rather than shoot the guy.. but this is Florida.
I wouldn't be surprised if it's still on the books ,that it's legal to feed trespassers to alligators.
"Call and file a report.." Then proceeds to not identify when asked.
And that's why people don't like cops.
well it does not help that the property owner is being uncooperative and passive aggressive for who knows what reason. the cop is not allowed to collect evidence. but is allowed to ask you questions, knock on your door and ask about something. the cop here is not being unreasonable. lets say the cop does leave and comes back with a warrant and the car is moved. now this homeowner would be considered a suspect of a possible crime..... then just cause more headache for himself, rather than just answering the questions honestly if of course the homeowner is NOT doing something illegal. but this makes it look a lot like he is actively trying to hide something.
@@maximusgladi8or too many what ifs. Guy was within his rights and told the cop to leave his property. Done. Also, failure to identify when asked is a crime for police in most places.
@@brettywap2295 the only what if is the cop now going to go get a warrant. even if the warrant is justified or not.... i don't know why people have such a big issue with just answering some questions like you are being interviewed for a multinational news network or something.
if a cop came to me when i was lingering around a parking lot and he asked why i was there. and i say "im cheating on my wife, waiting for my booty call right now" the cop would not arrest me for that he would probably judge me, but he would then just be like. "alright have a nice day" now if i was waiting for a drug drop, and i say im not doing anything and i refuse to answer his questions then all that is going to do is make him either come back or worse.
it is hilarious to me the amount of headache you bring upon yourself. weather you are right or wrong does not make a difference. and if the cop is wrong then do what you want. and at that point do are the one having an ego trip more so than the cop is. im not out here to compare dick sizes. im just trying to get by without being shot or thrown in jail for no reason.
@@maximusgladi8or but they weren't in a parking lot, they were on private property. And your other "what if" was the homeowner commiting a crime. Some people don't like the cops and don't want to help them, and rightfully so.
This is why cameras are important. I had 2 officers show up to my house and knock. I opened the door and asked them what they wanted. They said they were investigating a noise complaint. I said well it's not me as you can see. They asked if they could search the house and I asked if they had a warrant. He said no we are just asking and I said that when they got a warrant I'd let them in, until then I didn't want them in my house. They jerked me out of the house and put me in cuffs, told me I was under arrest for disturbing the peace and said they would let me go if I let them search the house. I said no, they ended up going in anyway and said I had given them consent. There was no mention of anything else in the report and of course because cops don't lie. The judge didn't believe me. So this long story is to remind people to always film every interaction you have with police.
Man, that's the shite that boils my blood! Hope it all went your way at some point. F*#$ING AHOLES!
@@usaturnuranus nope. Those officers are still working in that city. I moved the f**k out after a couple of more things happened. Man, always have a camera ready because they will f**k you over and they lie all the time.
I want to say unbelievable, but there are so many videos showing this exact some thing! Even if you had a video of it, the worst they would get is transferred... FUBAR
Where I live, the academy has a series of tests that would-be officers have to pass involving volunteer actors and props. One scenario has the officers respond to a noise complaint at an apartment, and it turns out there's an adult serving minors alcohol.
The first step is to knock, and encounter the adult who refuses the police entry. When/if the adult opens the door to speak to them, the officers can see the minors with the alcohol. At that point, a handful of officers will say, "I don't need a warrant, you're under arrest," and they'll search the apartment and arrest the minors. Those officers failed that scenario.
I wish every academy had tests like that.
Man that sucks when lame ass judges side with law enforcement. I guess that's what qualified immunity is.
The fact that there is absolutely nothing a person can do but watch the police trample their rights and hope it gets resolved in court is crazy.
And even then, the police won't care one bit and will continue doing what they do without any consequences.
It's tough, one wrong move they could just shoot you on the spot and still might not get it on his record at the end. As private citizens you are literally rolling a dice hoping that you got a good, respectable officer evrery time you come across them, which is why we are taught to let them win on the spot so you are at least alive to challenge the law later.
@@Kinlui1022 I absolutely agree. Take the ride, fight it in court. At least you'll live. It's sad but true.
What nah wheres all the 2nd and 4th ammendment dickheads at
I love how their truck says "Professionals in Law Enforcement" and this guy acts like a giant baby because the man used his rights.
The old “I’m just making sure everyone is ok,” routine. Dude can’t handle being embarrassed.
The Officer "Your not under an investigation"
Next thing he says
*police officer also unprofessionally smiles when calling him buddy, which he said sarcastically*
"I'm just trying to investigate"
The sheer hypocricy.
Most of the time "we got a call" Means they called themselves.
Imagine you break in to someone’s property and get angry when they tell you to leave😂
No problem. Could do this every day. Damn that different countries have different laws. :)
"I'll leave when I'm done" is some real fuckin' ballsy kind of the-law-is-for-you-not-for-me bullshit.
@@suoquainen Now I'm curious - which country is it that allows you to stay on private property after being told to leave by the owner?
@@Compufreak I knew that this question would come sooner or later. :)
But it was a little misunderstanding, because i wasn't really clear in what i meant, sorry.
Of course it isn't allowed to stay on a private property if told to leave. But the owner isn't allowed to take his hands unto you or harm you in any way. Otherwise even as intruder you could sue him for that. And the country you were asking for is Germany.
@@suoquainen Sorry but you are still wrong, if someone resists to leave it is allowed to use force, even in germany.
"Um einen Hausfriedensbruch abzuwehren bzw. zu beenden oder vorzubeugen, kann ein Hausverbot ausgesprochen werden. Der Hausherr ist befugt, das Hausverbot notfalls mit Gewalt (Notwehr (§ 32 StGB)) durchzusetzen.
"
(Source: Wikipedia, but can be found on other pages as well).
What gets me is that the officer tells Mr. Norris that the vehicle isn't Eli's, but then when talking to the second person he states that Eli's vehicle was abandoned. It's nutty that cops can lie freely but lying to a cop is "obstruction".
It's called "entrapment tactics"
1312
You hit the nail true. Right down the middle. Great job! Rights over wrong
Fuck this cop but he didnt actually say that. He said there is mail in the car that goes back to Eli as in prolly letters adressed to Eli
@@tabryis what is 1312 a reference to? I'm sorry I don't get it.
This is VERY important. I had an issue with Sheriff's deputies trespassing over a locked gate, no trespassing sign clearly in sight, when I found them they had their guns drawn on my dog. This was 200 yards inside my fences. They had the wrong place, and I saved my dog ONLY because I was home and heard him barking. I was so upset I just kicked them off my land, I should have filed a complaint and maybe saved someone else or their dog. Make sure to follow through and keep cops accountable to the law.
I am glad that you were able to save your dog. It seems that dogs know when the wrong person is on their property.
How police get the wrong place so frequently blows me away. If you’re going to serve a warrant or be in a situation you might need a weapon you should be triple checking where you’re at. Even in remote areas, you can still check tax assessors websites and get actual parcel numbers of where you’re at.
Google maps and all the technology so available to everyone it's really hard to believe they are getting the wrong place as often as they do!
It's only by following through that this crap will stop!
@@sanctifymymusicit’s because cops in general have a 5th grade IQ
“Was it locked?” “Uh yeah it had a chain on it” 😂 ridiculous
Rules for thee, not for me.
The minute a citizen says that he/she is no longer talking without an attorney, that should be the end of the conversation.
Second
@@warriorsdynastypart275 third
@@zayvee.f6343 fourth
@@Furiouspenguin27 fifth...amendment
No, that NEEDS to be the end of conversation. If the cops would do their job.
"What's your name and badge number" "I don't wanna give it to you, I don't give out information"
K... **Gets his license plate**
Pettyness because being butthurt about his interrupted powertrip.
After cutting a chain to a private property, so he can drive his ass to the house to snoop around in the private space of someone whom he knew was in jail.
The investigation of the parked car sounds like a bs excuse he made up on the spot, after realizing the property is still inhabitated.
another prime example of officers not knowing the LAW ... its the law, when asked an officer his name and badge number they have to give it to you ... this guys should be fired ... the system doesn't need officers like him, especially in todays climate ... so many officers being exposed for what they are ... bad ... there are many many good cops but the bad ones get all the press .. thanks to our corrupt journalists and news networks
@@timhartherz5652 According to the cop. he didn't cut the chain. He walked around it.
@@pullybungieharder Would have liked to see how he "walked" around the chain... with his f-ing CAR!
Something doesn't add up at all in this cop's story, which is why i think he made it up when being caught snooping around.
Why even bother in the first place, just tow the abadoned car and contact the registered owner, he will certainly know, who used his car.
Also highly illegal
reminds me of this joke...
A cop turns up at an old man's farm out in the country, says to him..
"I'm looking for stolen property... I'll be searching your entire farm"
The old man replies...
"No worries boss, but you wanna stay outta the end paddock"
Cop pulls out his badge and says..
"You see this badge? It means I can go wherever I like on your farm.. Got it?"
the old man replies "Got it boss."
five minutes later the old man hears a blood curdling shriek from the end paddock,
and sees the cop screaming running for his life from the biggest meanest bull you've ever seen.
The old man cups his hands around his mouth and shouts...
"THE BADGE BOSS!... SHOW HIM YOUR BADGE!"
good one
I love it, ha ha ha ha
"so, who is Eli to you?"
you are DEFINITELY under investigation with that question, he's trying to establish a social network for the purpose of investigating it as a criminal network
"Id like you to get off my property now please"
"Okay, sorry about that, thanks for all your help."
"No problem ".
Thats how that *should've* went.
should have*
Ok
@@bigwitt187 should've "gone". The word "should've" is acceptable.
Ah thks Seth, I needed a good laugh... Cheers...
But sadly it didnt
"I don't understand what the problem is."
This is the response they all seem to give when people use their rights given to them. It's pretty ridiculous.
"I don't understand what the problem is" then evolves into a stern "here's the thing". That's the exact moment the cop has no more patience for anyone's rights.
Absolutely rude as well and a jerk
Yeah, as if we're required to provide a reason why we want someone to leave our property.
don't forget the typical "you need to calm down" every time someone argue their questionable behaviors.
- Our rights are not "given" to us by any document (Constitution) or governmental entity. They are "natural" or God-Given rights.
The wording of Constitution was to grant specific certain rights to the Federal government. The Bill of Rights enumerates how the government CANNOT infringe on our rights - it does not enumerate the Citizen's rights, since those rights NOT granted to the government are reserved for the people and States.
Can you imagine telling someone that they should find a new place to live because the person they live next to won't allow them to trespass on their property?!
"You aren't under investigation for anything"
*2 seconds later*
"This is an investigation-"
yeah thats means the officer is investigating the car down the road and asking the neighbours whats going on. He made that pretty clear
He meant that the guy filming was not the subject of an investigation.
Holy horseshit reasoning Batman.
@@jamessurprisal2286 for now lol
You may be short a few brain cells.
"You're tresspassing."
"Call and file a report."
Seriously? At this point you are an armed intruder and you're just going to casually be a jerk?
He should have blocked his truck in and called local police
@@motorguy4203 he would have shot him.
@@motorguy4203 so committing false imprisonment is better? Lol
@Alex Wynters AMERICA. FUCK YEAH!
@Alex Wynters No you wouldn't.
"911? Yeah, there's an armed individual on my property, refusing to leave. He claims he's a peace officer, but he's refusing to identity himself."
And then you would have 20 Police all over your property. LOL
If there wasn't so many chickenshit people in the US to hold their ground against tyrants that enter their property unlawfully and carrying weapons only pulling out a phone But instead pulled out a weapon on the officer this would not be an epidemic in this country PERIOD.
2 Amendment was made for moments just like this...
@@youtubecensorsmycomments8036 exactly. You can't go and film on a police precinct sidewalk without them coming out and rudely kicking you out and threatening to arrest you. So why should they be allowed to come onto your property and not identity themselves. Assholes.
@@spencercachat7233 actually you can
@@deusvult6920 actually you can't without someone fucking with you
Whenever a cop says "here's the deal/thing" they are about to violate your rights.
I had an officer enter my sister's house illegally when she was not home and only I was in it. Then harassed me and also said how can we afford the house we stayed with a low income. I felt assaulted and harassed but didn't understand the law at the time.
I live in Kalispell and know the officer. He's such a tool! Our job site got robbed last Christmas and he literally laughed at us because our chain was cut that held our tools together. I hope he loses his badge!
Doesn't surprise me.
He's good with chains I hear.
Hes even got the I was picked on in school haircut.
@@travislong2176 ? I agree he shouldn't have violated rights, but he just has normal short hair.
@@debunkinghistory214 I bet I could line up 10 guys with short hair and u could spot the cop js 😆
I love how surprised and upset cops get when a private citizen doesn’t want to answer their questions
@@It-s-me-P overly petty? So there’s an acceptable level of pettiness?
@@It-s-me-P Exercising your rights is petty?
Also that 1984 case is BS and needs to be thrown out and barred from being a precedent ever again.
What a stupid person, that cop just trying to do his job. And they only post this on youtube for the viewing figures and the money you get for these nonsense videos. Get a real job.
@@fernsong8558 Its being petty and rude. I don't HAVE to hold the door open for someone behind me carrying a box, and I don't HAVE to cover my face and turn away when I sneeze in public, but I DO because its being decent. Get it? So if a cop just trying to do his job needs to ask me some questions, I'll answer, even though I may not have to by law. If anyone wants to ask me reasonable questions, I'll answer. If I'm busy and the conversation is getting too long, then I'll excuse myself and leave, but just being rude from the start makes you the asshole. The vast majority of people on ATA may be "within their rights" but they are also all complete assholes who hate all police and all start the conversations rudely. I can think of like 1 ATA video where the guy the cops walk up to wasn't angry and rude from the get go.
I recently caught a State Trooper and F&G officer trespassing on my property while I was home. I confronted them and the Trooper immediately agreed that they were in violation but gave weak excuses for it. He didn’t have explanation for why he didn’t knock on the door and get permission. The bold willingness to knowingly trespass without apology was alarming.
What about the officer's failure to Identify himself? That should also be a HUGE concern in addition to the other problems !
Failure to identify can also be perceived as impersonating law enforcement...That opens up another big can of chocolate covered worms...
He should be fired for not showing his identify, so this mean he was trespass for no reason. Hope these folks should charge him for trespass without showing them his identify.
Anytime the cop says: "oh you're filming? me too" -- you know he's gonna get an F 😂😂
Yeah, sadly the cops video evidence is backed by him being an officer of the court and you are shit on a stick in court if your evidence isn't on the original device used or memory card. They will always find a way to discredit your evidence versus their evidence.
@@Chris-dg6km well, the evidence should match so I dunno what you are going on about.
From my limited understanding of the law it varies from just being courteous to having a duty to notify that you are being recorded on the part of the officer depending on the location. It can help establish a rapport and diffuse some of the tension. Not really an F in my eyes.
i usually respond with "yea but mines is backed up to the cloud and won't conveniently get corrupted or turned off when it suits me"
😐
usually has them going really, but how many times have we seen this happen? a body cam obstructed on purpose, either physically or tapping on it to distort the audio... or turning it off
@@Chris-dg6km meta data doesn't lie so that argument is irrelevant, they will try and destroy that argument by trying to claim it can be tampered but a expert can easily destroy their argument by giving simple facts and easy to follow hypotheticals
“I can go anywhere I want” and this is a prime example of how we’ve given police way too much power.
I had one tell me he was going to make my life a living hell if I didn't tell him what he wanted to know. To bad for him, I didn't know anything and he eventually figured it out.
its not power granted to police it was a personal decision to respond as such. dont be a stupid emo
@Gareth Tucker Private property extends to the property line. Although most people choose to have open rights of access for their own convenience it does not mean they do not have the right to erect fences, locked gates and signage that prevents further entrance than the boundary line. When crossing a boundary such as this it is irrelevant whether you are entering a field or a building. Entering through a locked gate on signaged private property is no less a violation than walking through my front door without a warrant. It is illegal.
Your second part implies the boundary being at the property line prevents communication in a way beyond allowing access to the front door. It doesn't. If I am asleep and don't answer the door the police can not enter because they want to chat to me. If I am in the bath and literally ignore them at the door, they can not enter just because they want to chat to me. The physical distance between the door and me sleeping (a few metres) or the locked gate and the resident's location on his property (any distance, even miles) are irrelevant, they do not have the right to enter the private property without a warrant. If they are standing at my door or standing by a locked gate the next course of action is the same. They either get a warrant THEN enter or they need to leave and find an alternative way to make contact eg post/phone etc.
Does that make sense now? I hope it does, but feel free to ask about anything that doesn't! 😊
and this cop has gotten 0 backlash for this, because this man uploaded a video rather than filing a police report or suing him. Sad.
Cops are only going to continue to get worse. Buy a gun and be safe.
@@Art-zs6sl I had a cop pull this when I was age 16, I immediately got out my phone, began recording and said "NAME AND BADGE NUMBER" he quickly apologized, got in his car, and drove away. Coward pigs
The cop’s response when the guy says he is not going to answer any questions without a lawyer present is very telling. He is very condescending from that point forward and we all have constitutional rights for this very reason. He was on that man’s property illegally, and he got caught. These cops do whatever they want to do, and as long as every investigation into them is an internal investigation, they will not stop. Third-party investigations are necessary.
@jennifer6515.., VERRY WELL SPOKEN, Ms"6515" ~Peace~Kyl..🥀
Funny how the cop turned it into "wanting to make sure the person is ok".. because he's on camera. What a tool. Thank God for video.
“Who’s car is it?”
It’s Eli’s
“It’s not registered to him”
He clearly knows who the car belongs to, or at the very least has the ability to access that information. To know it isn’t registered to someone, they have to know who it is registered to. Makes you wonder what the real purpose of the visit was.
Exactly like I knew that was bull as soon as he said they knew where the car was because they can just look at the registration and who it’s attached to
What the cop did, looks like a fishing expedition to me.
So using the 5th amendemend right to remain silent, seems a very smart move to me.
I wonder..
I think telephones we're invented telegrams postal service had been invented by the this investigation date
@@brianhurt3801 what?
"Only criminals have anything to fear from the ..."
We all have every reason to fear a police officer who doesn't know the law and is a straight-up egotist.
No thats not true ,innocent people get harassed and convicted by police for something they did not do and end up in jail ,just saying
Only you yourself is looking out for your best interests--never forget that.
The cops ARE the criminals. To date the cops have stolen 68.8 BILLION dollars from citizens not even accused of any crime, under the civil forfeiture act. And the Supreme Court has ruled this is just fine and dandy.
I'll tell ya what we have to fear more than police officers who do not know the law though, criminals. Dirty cops exist and need to be drummed out of the force, possibly prosecuted. Ignorant cops exist and need to be educated. However, being someone who had a stepson and three close friends murdered over the decades, I can attest from experience that all criminals protest their innocence. Fact is, we have far more to fear from criminals, just sayin. Timmy was killed at 14, no amount of justice is enough, he would have been 39 now. Unless you've been through it, there is no way you can understand the regret and anger.
It should be the legal duty for law enforcement to police their own ranks to get rid of bad apples.That being said if it weren't for law enforcement we would be beset by groups of marauders on a regular basis,look around there are plenty out there of all races.We need every officer to be a Matt Dillon not a Gengis Kahn.
This way we need stand your ground laws against cops trespassing in people home and property
Indiana has a law this cop wouldn't like
I've said this before that even if you can't get a cent from a lawsuit, you need to file charges to get these thugs written up or have them removed from their department!!
Filing a lawsuit costs money that not everyone can spare
@@pondlakes There are attorneys and others that are willing to look at your case and make a determination if you actually have a case and then take action. Don't give up without researching it at least. How else will these criminals be taken out??
@@ronallen6578 Yeah if I ever, god forbid, find myself in a similar situation I would not open the door and I have cameras hidden nearby any entry way into my home so if they wanted to pull that shit I would just wait till I had access to an attorney and exercise attorney client privilege to ensure my attorney gets any relevant footage and would add that I will only seek monetary damages if the officers involved aren't terminated without any pay or form of compensation from the department or state in exchange for only asking to have my legal fees paid instead. I would be interested only in seeing the bastards squirm as I screw them out of their jobs :)
A civilian cannot file or press charges. You can file a criminal complaint. District attorneys file/press charges
There are literally thousands of lawsuits against police that have been awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Your comment is patently false.
Cops that get frustrated because you’re exercising your rights just blows me away.
They’re the same kind of person in the comments of pro police videos saying disgusting racist shit and conflating every black persons with George Floyd who apparently was faking it
Exercising your rights doesn't have to be an obnoxious exchange. The home owner was a piece of shit from the start as well, which was not needed. I understand knowing your rights, but I never understand why these people feel the need to be blatantly obnoxious about it.
@@Chase615000 No, the cops needs to do his job and not be obnoxious. Cops are too used to getting anything they want from any citizens totally ignoring laws and even AMENDMENTS.
@@Chase615000so a person can enter your locked property with no warrant, can conduct an illegal investigation, harass your neighbor, slander you to their face, and can refuse to leave after being ordered off of private property they had no legal right to be on and somehow, in your tiny smooth brain, you’re on the trespassers side?
You should stop licking boots. The rubber is rotting your brain away, pal.
@@Chase615000 he asked him nicely, he even said please! I wish obnoxious people were like that.
“So here’s the thing” means you’re about to hear justification for nonsense.
Classic...
"In this day and age"
“What you need to understand...”
Copsplaining
“I don’t understand what your problem is”
As an armed gang member breaks into your property to harass you and your neighbour
And since he revoked permission to be on the land cop is now considered an armed trespasser, and should be dealt with as such
It used to be this way. But back then the Sheriff could at any time needed form a posse, And come to your land to inform you, then leave. The Sheriff's are elected by the people, The police work for whoever pays them. If you have a good Sheriff, let them know you support them. We didn't in most cases have a active policing force, the Sheriff and deputies were all most towns had and they actually carry a lot of power.
Deputy Mark was made to look like a total tool. Full smack down. I love it. Well done to the property owner!
The most frustrating detail about this whole thing is that he had no real reason to be there, since he already knew who drove the vehicle and why it was parked where it was.
tresspasser = ALAKABLAM
These small town cops seriously are on out of control power trips and for months in a row have no serious work to do. Bad combo.
@@eagsalazar Yeah and there are more now because during the 2019-2021 phase of police departures so many big city police ended up in small town agencies.
@KJ10 who was brown? The hell are you talking about? Just stop with the racial b******* if that's where you're going
Also that 1984 case is BS and needs to be thrown out and barred from being a precedent ever again.
"Hello 9-1-1, I've got an armed person trespassing on my property bothering my renters, and he won't leave even though I've asked him to."
as soon as osifer asshat went at my tennant I would have told him to get onto public property and been on the phone doing Exactly that. that cop was armed and stupid with a barney fife gun on the side of his dirty ass. he was out of control
🙂
@@urpgag2 Unfortunately, that's not how it works. Just as the landlord for a renter is not allowed to make entry to the property they are renting, without giving notice beforehand, for the sake of the law, these are considered separate domiciles. The LEO would be within their power to attempt contact at both. Obviously, in this case, the officer already knew or reasonably should have known the subject he was "investigating" was already in custody.
The deputy was clearly trespassing, as there were absolutely no exigent circumstances for him to cross through a chained gate. He not only jeopardized his own safety, he also violated the civil rights of those who lived on the property. It is a clear violation of the prohibition of illegal searches and seizures as stated in the 4th Amendment. As I've said in at least one other reply to this post, anything the officer would normally be able to use to charge someone with, like illegal substances in plain view, would or should be tossed as fruit of the poisonous tree. The guy that lived there was much more gracious than I would probably have been.
@@urpgag2 If I have an issue with the police, I definitely wouldn't trust the police to come handle it.
Wait. You forgot a part.
Don’t forget to add “Hes asking questions about a vehicle I abandoned at a school because one of my renters was in jail after I called the cops on him and reported him for assault and I no longer wanted his vehicle on my property so I drove it down to the school while he was in jail and abandoned it. Thereby illegally evicting and abandonment of property. And he unlooped my cattle gate to ask these questions.”
More to this then the video.
I recommend getting an intercom system for locked gates. That way, if it's bypassed and someone enters the property (breaking through or going around the locked gate), then it can be considered trespassing and dealt with appropriately.
what kind of intercom system
5:50 "You're not under investigation for anything" *lol wow*
8:02 "I'm here conducting an investigation" *wth haha*
5:53 "You're not under investigation"
6:01 "I'm just trying to investigate"
8:03 "I'm here conducting an investigation"
The cop was investigating what was going on with the suspicious car. He wasn't investigating the residents specifically. I'm not sure why that is so hard for y'all to understand.
@@tehmidgenator2377 so he asked his questions bc he was investigating after trespassing...
@@tehmidgenator2377 The officer's right to be on the property depends on whether or not he has a reason to be there, ie, investigating something. This is literally in the video.
@@tehmidgenator2377 the cop went through a locked gate and refused to leave private property upon request, while acting like a child being told no. I'm not sure why that is so hard for you to understand.
“You’re not under investigation ... what’s your name ... (asks neighbour) what’s his name”. What a liar.
Seems like the common thing about all these situations is that a cop gets their ego hurt and spiral into pettiness.
The latter half is basically the case with most altercations. I was watching a video on how an instructor, who is now a police commander, had arrested someone because they couldn't move a truck while the owner of said truck- a retired firefighter chief, was actively trying to make sure a car crash victim didn't die on them. The cop, and the DA -the person under that position is now a judge- said that the arrest was lawful under something along "obstruction of justice". Really goes to show how anyone with power has a power trip if their authority is challenged by anyone, really. BTW, thanks to the commitment of that chief, the victim's life was saved, even while it was predicted the victim would die. The chief walked away with dropped charges and handcuff marks, and the blessings of a survivor on the other hand.
Yeah, I've noticed that.
Perfect observation. Spot on. Hats off to you sir.
and pettiness can result in as low as hurt feeling or as bad as painting a target on your back. cops have some scarry power if they are willing to abuse it and have the backing of other officers
@@kevinalmeida7159 Basically the Chauvin case.
The fact he was just investigating a stranded vehicle is also VERY strange. You just tow abandoned cars, you don't go door to door like this over them. I'm glad they refused to answer any more questions. They just ask Guilt-Seeking questions anymore. Also, one check of their system would have shown "Eli" was in jail already, where they could talk to him easily. Now imagine if "Eli" had any illicit substances in that car and the homeowner had answered more questions, they'd just link them and assume they were all users.
Because of the note left. Some real scholars here.
I think it would have helped the officer understand why he was annoyed if he had clearly stated, "I don't appreciate you coming past a locked gate. There is a reason for that lock. In the future, call or leave a note in the mailbox."
I understand the cop was trying to figure out what was with the abandoned vehicle. He needs to know if someone is sick or injured or disappeared. The vehicle is not registered to the "Eli" in jail so that raised concern.
My carpool met in the parking lot of a chain restaurant and took turns driving the 30 miles to work. We noticed a vehicle covered with snow for two weeks and decided it was not someone on vacation who left car to catch the bus. We let cops know and sure enough it was stolen and abandoned. We later learned the thief caught a bus right there and disappeared in Chicago.
But reviewing the video it becomes obvious the officer has an ego problem and seems to think he is the ultimate law around there. "I'll leave when I'm done", is a clear intent to ignore the wishes of the homeowner and reveals the officer does not understand the law that he is obligated to honor.
Like vampires, they can't enter a dwelling unless they're invited.
Thats hysterical
They are bloodsuckers between them stealing peoples property and wasting tax dollars on busting Uber drivers giving out rides.
I wish the sun affected them the same way. At least they'd be out there only half the time they are now.
🤣
except they just do it anyway
“I would find a new place to live if I was you because your landlord wouldn’t give me any information and asked me to leave when I was trespassing, this is ridiculous”
At that point, the officers Ego was through the roof and was mad he didn't have control over the citizen.
That's a good landlord.
@James Hardon even if that were true (it’s not) that’s not why the cop is there. He’s literally trespassing and not leaving when asked. What he did was straight up illegal.
@James Hardon I’m not, the cop here by definition is a criminal.
@James Hardon You are quite mistaken. I own 80 acres of land. I have my house. Than a building with two apartments in it. IDK where you came up with that one.
The disdain for people asserting their rights is appalling.
People should be allowed to remove them by ANY MEANS!
I'm a retired police detective and this video was well done. After retiring I have had a Deputy trespassing on my farm and stating he had the authority to go where he wants.....wrong. No warrant, no entry. Contact by phone. No trespassing signs mean no trespassing. As far as the the abandoned vehicle, just tow it.
You shoulda popped some shots at that cop for unlawfully trespassing, they need to learn their place and forcefully.
@@failadin1 Um not a good idea? If he did he'd end up being in jail. And you shouldn't shoot cops if they're doing something wrong
And cops shouldn't shoot innocent people if they're doing something wrong, They'll learn their lesson soon enough.
@@failadin1 Who said they did
Question: you mentioned no trespassing signs mean no trespassing. Does that mean that the absence of a no trespassing signs means your rights are different should someone you don't wish to be on your property is on your property?
"Jesus, unbelievable, I have to follow the law? What was even point of become a cop if I can't break the rules???"
There are in fact many laws which limit LEOs. In fact you can sue them under those laws for violations. Such as “Deprivation of rights under color of law”. Arbitrary and illegal violations by LEOs constitutes “color of law”.
He expects the officer to ID himself but he's rude n "doesn't talk to cops" when roles reversed! Childish AF!
@@rayabercrombie6239 they are required to give you their name and badge number if you ask
@@Smurf5738 not in all states
@@Smurf5738 I know this but I'd tell them f off... I have to shoe respect and give you mine but you can be a child and refuse? Write me up!! Lol
Well he was very polite about kicking him off his property, despite the trespass, he said please lol😂
I was working out at the family ranch one day when a game warden showed up. I looked up and happened to see him past a fence and walking through one of the fields. I yelled at him and told him to get out of the field and he got red in the face and started screaming at me. "YOU SEE THIS BADGE?! IT SAYS I CAN GO WHEREEVER I WANT!!!" I was like, "Okay!" and got back to work.. a few minutes later I hear him yelling, "HEEELLLLP!!!" while tearin ass across the field with our bull right behind him. I yelled back, "SHOW UM YOUR BADGE!!"
That's great hahaha
Old joke and you didn't even set it up proper, lame.
"Are you telling me i cant violate your rights"
"but im mark"
Most cops are failed losers. That’s why they join the force. They crave power.
@@tenminutetokyo2643 that is so incredibly sad
lol
@@tenminutetokyo2643 ehhh, big cities I’ll agree. Sheriffs and small towns are another story. Power corrupts even the most honest of men. There’s a lot of bad eggs but there’s even more good cops out there, the good cops don’t ever get anywhere near as much attention as the bad ones, as with everything in life.
Oh, hi Mark
Cops get so booty hurt when they can't do anything they want. It's helarious.
Yup, their "Do as I say or else" policing gets torched when a citizen knows his/her rights and chooses to exercise them...Along with the help of cell camera, of course...
Not really even funny though because that same ego trip is what kills people.
@@wutflex agreed! This isn't funny. This is also ignorance of purview and authority that is directly related to his job.
@@wutflex When people say it's funny they think they can do whatever they want, it doesn't really mean it's funny it's a sarcastic way to say that it's wrong that they think they are able to do whatever they please.... It's funny how you thought they were seriously laughing about it... Or it's hilarious... Same meaning
@@jonathonmartin7563 Ditto its funny how you thought I was seriously critiquing the comment. I was simply pointing out the irony 😅 I'm not an alien that just landed on earth yesterday..
I like how insulted the cop is by people not blindly following orders
Only thing that makes me question the "trespassing" allegation, is that if the owner refuses to identify himself as the landowner, then how can the deputy know that he was asked to leave by the landowner? It seems to me that in order to provide clear communication, the landowner needs to establish himself as the landowner with the legal and legitimate authority to trespass another.
I think that is a reasonable take, but I think someone walking out the front door of a house, barring any other evidence to the contrary, is enough evidence that they are the owner of a house.
It doesn't matter what you think.
@@benk2755 it doesn’t matter what he thinks because he’s an American citizen
ok
This is a beautiful example of their thought process. You can see he is genuinely shocked that someone is questioning his overreaching authority. You get used to pushing people around for so long your surprise when people start to push back. And people are pushing back.
People have always been pushing back. It's only recently that things are being recorded. If you think this is the exception you're poorly mistaken.
ALL of them.
2:10 "that's OK, I'm recording too"
Well, the difference is that my record will not be magically lost or erased somehow.
Lol you child these are police officers they deal with idiots pushing back every single day
@@sally2395 the only idiots are the officers themselves.
“Yeah I’m looking for the owner of this car”
“He’s in jail”
“Oh ok I guess I’ll just have to harass you then.”
I mean I’m genuinely curious as to how the car got there if the owner was in jail
@@ericflores-moreno7558 I mean I'm genuinely curious as to how you wake up every morning with that room temperature IQ of yours.
There are so many obvious possibilities for this, such as the owner leaving their car there and took alternative transport to the jail knowing they will be held up for a while.
Kittens Chan Kittens Chan well when you get arrested you don’t just just take yourself to jail man the cop who arrested you takes you. Say for example the guy in this video was being arrested for burglary the cop wouldn’t tell him ok go home and come back to jail later.
Either way if he did turn himself in parking at a school just seems weird. I don’t see if that was the case why he wouldn’t just leave the car at home or even just at some big parking lot like a Walmart. I dunno man just seems weird to me how someone’s car who’s supposed to be in jail ended up in a school parking lot out of all places
@@ericflores-moreno7558 It really has to be a medical miracle how you even have enough brainpower to wake up every morning.
You do realize that there's this concept called "friends and family"? A relative or friend could have easily collected the car on his behalf while he was being arrested.
Or, it could very well be one of those areas where the county jail doubles up as a prison and he was given a few days of compassionate notice after a court ruling to settle his personal affairs before surrendering himself at the jail.
Kittens Chan again man the car was left at a school, why would a friend or family member leave it at a school and not his house? If it was so easy to explain they wouldn’t be sending police officers to investigate it.
Before I started watching these videos I was under the impression that law enforcement didn’t have any issues but these videos have been eye opening. I am a firm believer that law enforcement can not police themselves and it must be done by an independent outside agency. Any discipline should also be decided by that agency. Any money awarded should also be the responsibility of the offending officer or officers and not the taxpayers. I believe this will help detour any ego run amuck issues from officers.Cops have no idea what the law is!! We need to sue these cops in hope they loose there immunity...they hire these low IQ people
This is a very rare instance and typically never occurs, said no one, ever.
"Im not investigating you"
"Okay good because I'm not answering any more questions"
"Okay here's the deal, I'm conducting an investigation here...."
for real, what a load of bullshit. it doesnt matter if an officer is "investigating" you, every single word you say will be used when it turns into an investigation...
Lmao
Yeah well hes doing an investigation but not investigating the person who he is asking. Hes gathering the information on what he is investigating
I noticed that too.
@@Mystic_Void what does the investigation have to do with his name if he isn’t a part of the investigation?
"call and file and report then" right because that does anything. kudos to this private citizen for being as cordial as possible
@Man Of Chai Tea no but if you ever go to court for something related your behavior will play a big part.
I wonder if this clear violation of the law by a local officer could be reason to call 911 about the armed trespasser harassing those who live on the property, requesting a state officer?
There's NOTHING you can do , it's just like the rest of government, they are all in on it, we are all screwed
Call the sheriff's department and report a trespassing.
Should have gotten a little louder, probably would have worked in his favor. Nice people get walked on.
I've always said that I can keep you off my land, and you can keep me off your land, but I'm not worried about you, and I'm not the one you should be worried about. The people that I want to keep off my land, like atf, fbi, tax collectors, and police, are the ones that I can't do anything about .
Federal officer: “Mister, this badge says I can go anywhere on your farm that I want to.”
Farmer: “You don’t have my permission, but do what you’re gonna do. Please stay out of my barn.”
(The fed walks into the pasture surrounding the barn, and into the barn. Soon he emerges at a run - a 2,000-lb bull chasing him.)
Farmer: “Show him your badge!”
The worst part is the cop parroting the “I don’t answer questions” to him asking for name and badge number. If you think the guy is acting ridiculous, why would you do the same thing? Surely a police officer would lead by example but I guess not
Isnt there a law to arrest people who are not cooperating?
@@DucDrace well, they like to call it obstruction or impeding an investigation. 🤷♀️
"well-spoken" in their world means you're proficient at speaking out both sides of your mouth. At any time, anywhere, that's how you know you're speaking with an officer. Dumbassed pricks. (I really am naturally pro-cop by the way, but I no longer trust any of them...they're going to have to earn that back). Meanwhile I shall call them by the names that become them.
@@DucDrace only if they commit a crime or refuse a lawful order.
@@DucDrace The officer needs reasonable grounds to assume that the uncooperative citizen has DONE something illegal. Simply refusing to answer questions or comply with unlawful requests by the officer is entirely within the citizen's legal rights, even in Canada. Resisting arrest, however, is unlawful behaviour, and there's actually a video (at least one, and I think on this channel) in which a lawyer is arrested for "obstruction of justice" in refusing to give his client's personal belonging to the officer. The lawyer knew what would happen, even if the officer didn't. I definitely recommend watching that (or those) to see how to react to being arrested for doing nothing illegal.
When he walked away but we still have 6 mins on the clock
Somethings wrong I can feel it
Bro I once had 3 individual officers in the same day approach me when I was 19 at my parents house confront at separate times throughout the day because someone in my neighborhood who had line of sight of the garage who've never seen me before thought I was a burglar trying to break into said property and called the police.. "I was chipping paint along the garage, I had been doing this since 7:00am"
First Officer: Amy - Arrived between 11:30am - 12:00pm with her hand already on her holster as she approached me up our driveway. I turned around slowly recognizing her hand placement and was like may I help you. She's like what're you doing I am like "removing paint from the garage hence the chipper and the ladder etc." I'm like you gonna take your hand off the gun I am like 10ft from you I am no threat to you. She's like well we got a call that looks like you were trying to break in to the property. "If I wanted to break in wouldn't it make more sense to use to the open window to your right, or the door around the side out of view of the street instead of doing this in broad daylight on the garage door in full view of all my neighbors and not that it matters but the garage isn't locked it doesn't lock it's been broke since before I was born. She than goes on to ask my age and like I said I was 19 at the time, she's like are you working I am like no, she's like you in school I am like I am on break. Than she eventually leaves.
Second Officer: Brian - Arrived between 2:00pm - 3:00pm and casually walked up and was like how's it going I am like again.. he's like what..? I am like bro there was another officer by the name of Amy up here earlier because someone made a false report that I was breaking into my own home when in fact I am simply removing paint from the garage. He's like we get a call we have to investigate.. I am like don't you communicate with one another or something? Shouldn't you know if you've been here already so you know not to be arriving to the same location about the same thing over and over again. He's like this is the first I am hearing about it and your tone is gonna get you into trouble. I am like what're you gonna do? I haven't done anything except tell you one of your own people were here and even used her name "full name in person" so that should be evidence enough. I am not hostile or approaching you I am sitting here against the garage and telling you the same things as I told her if I were going to break in I would use the open window, I would use the side door of the garage instead of the main door in full view of the neighborhood and though it doesn't matter the garage door doesn't lock it never has this was my grandparents house before it became ours. He casually walked away with his hurt pride after I proved I have done nothing wrong.
Third Officer: Sergio - Arrived between 5:00pm - 5:35pm at this point I am on fire because i am like wtf!! this dude calmly walks up and is like calm down why don't you tell me what is going on I am like bro you're the third officer today.. let me guess someone reported a suspicious person or potential break in? He's like you've been here all day? I am like I live here. I've been over this with two other Officers a lady named Amy and a guy named Brian and both were kinda douche about the whole interaction. She walks up with her hand on her weapon like my paint chipper is gonna hit her from 15ft away and Brian acts like he's gonna detain me because I have a attitude about the lack of communication between the department and you in the field. Whoever is making the false reports needs to be bothered and charged because they're wasting your time and bothering the hell outta me.
They don't know me because I am rarely outside because I have a rare condition where the sunlight irritates my skin so longevity exposure actually harms me so I only really come outside on cloudy days or when it's raining or whatever. I am like do you need my name? He's like no I am sure it's there bro. I am like thank you! He's like no problem we won't bother you again my man and sorry about the disturbances.
Thank you, for making this video.
you're welcome, everyone should know their rights.
This guy has to be one of,if not the most, informative UA-cam narrator ever. I watch whatever he post because I know I’m gonna learn something each time
Facts
I watch this guys videos from the United Kingdom and although the laws are different here compared to over there on your side of the Atlantic Ocean I find the content very educational and interesting.
I believe, though I could be wrong, that the guy narrating isn't the one who creates the content, in older videos it was a different gentleman narrating, seems he hired the narrator or got a friend to do it.
No lie
@@umamagei you are not wrong, the original creator had some kind of surgery involving his voice. Afterwards this narrator took over. The video creator still writes the script for this narrator.
"I don't understand what your problem is."
and that's the problem! If an AMERICAN'S RIGHTS are the very last thing you take into account, if at all, then you are not fit to protect and serve the people.
Yea, cops like him are why people like me are standoff-ish to pigs.
I've got a problem with Authority, you've got a problem with having Authority
@@powerslave3473 only there to serve and protect their paycheck.
But yet you wear a mask
@@tomreid5002 So you think no shoes no shirt and no service is violating your rights too, eh? It's your right to walk into a private business shirtless?
@@tomreid5002 Ahhh you're one those people.
Very well edited and the information aka content are put together nicely. 👍👍
They’re quick to trespass you from public property but take their sweet time when you trespass them from your property
"There was a locked door on the front of your house but I don't understand why that makes you upset I'm eating your cereal, officer."
If its PB Crunch, id be livid.
Unlike the property owner, the officer is required to identify himself, by law.
The laws regarding this are different from state to state.
@@ulrichkalber9039here in montana, he has to identify himself.
Which he did, after he trespassed
@@ulrichkalber9039The supreme court will beg to differ
@@ulrichkalber9039 wrong. Law Enforcement is ALWAYS required to identify themselves when entering or otherwise accessing private property. The US Supreme Court has been very clear about this.
Cop finds it incredible that the homeowner doesn't want to assist in incriminating himself or his friend.
"I'm just making sure everyone is ok" is such an overused lie that cops immediately go to when they get caught doing something they aren't supposed to be doing. If somebody on that property wanted the police up there, they would've called for them.
I like how the officer tells him he's not under investigation, as if that means anything. They're legally allowed to lie to you.
It is a "crime", however, for you to lie to them.
A lot of people don't know this. Through the course of an investigation police are allowed to make "Honest Mistakes." Judges legalized officer's lying if they can conjure a good enough reason before or after they tell you lies and under the law it is justifiable. You get caught lying and see if the system is fair and balanced.
people lie to them all the time
Also that 1984 case is BS and needs to be thrown out and barred from being a precedent ever again.
That's a FACT!!! They are legally allowed to LIE to YOU to get what they want ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL GOBERMINT... yep... So, just do as he or she tells you to, then, you will HAVE NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT... They know what they are doing and they are the EXPERT at RIGHT FROM WRONG...Plus, they ONLY speak the TRUTH and don't know how to LIE... ROTFLMAO!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
the owner clearly confused and concerned as to how the officer gain access through the locked gate. you can hear the concern in his pause because now he might have a security problem on his hand
Or realizes that the cop just vandalized his gate to get inside.
the owner said it was locked, the officer said something about a chain before getting interrupted - my question: was it locked with a lock, or just a 'loose' chain wrapped around => does both count as locked? because if not and if there was no lock, would it mean the officer wasn't trespassing?
@@dirksteinbach9370 he mentioned something like "i don't know if you have horses" or something, which makes it sound like that gate is just too keep animals in and might not have an actual lock
@@dirksteinbach9370 Montana is a Open Range State. The duty is to lock animals out not lock them in. Many houses have cattle gates between road and front door.
I’ve got a picture of this house and this cattle gate. Paddock clearly visible from the road.
The gate was closed but no locked.
Also it’s likely the vehicle the officer was talking about was parked on the property when the guy who was driving it went to jail. The guy filming ditched the car at the school down the road to get it off of his property while the driver was in jail. The guy filming called the cops on the guy in jail. You can google the articles.
@@dirksteinbach9370 The video cites a case that says that police are able to approach a house to ask questions, so I don't see how entering through the unlocked but chained gate would be trespassing or an unreasonable search. Also, Norris refuses to confirm that he is the landowner, so the police officer could argue that he did not know Norris had the right to tell him to leave.
"A deputy with the Flat Head Sherrif's office"
Excuse me what
refused to leave then dragged his heals every step of the way , then topping off with refusing to identity himself. he tried to project calm but this cop is a rouge
It is illegal for an officer to not identify himself. This is an offence and should be brought to the attention of the superintendent general or similar of the police in that area. In nearly every country in the world except China, Burma, Chili, North Korea, Iraq and Iran, an officer is obliged to give his or her surname, number, rank and station attached to. To not do this is an offence.
@@trevordeane3940 no it's not. Contrary to popular belief a cop does not have to give their name and badge number by law. It is most departments policy, but not law in the United States.
@@trevordeane3940 There is NO legal requirement for a police officer to identify himself or what dept he works for. There may be a dept policy, but certainly NO legal requirement.
He started being a dick after the guy initiated being a dick......
@@trinity1722 You're right, though there is a state law here in Wisconsin requiring them to identify when asked.
When asked what’s his name and badge number the deputy says “I don’t give information...” as the camera pans across “Professionals in law enforcement” written on the truck. Excellent cinematography 😁
Finally someone realizes that these videos are fake!! Bravo these videos can cause someone to get in real trouble
@@markodukic6380 I did what you should've done and looked up flathead county to see if their police cars really have that on them and it turns out... they do.
@@markodukic6380 👈🔧
@@markodukic6380 Not at all fake-that is a 100% legit Flathead County Sheriff vehicle. Lived here over 30 yrs. Had a few interactions with the FCS, most have been professional but 2 were not. Don't know this particular deputy by sight but he looks like an arrogant SOB to me...
This is the right way to handle this. Please watch it all.
Yes
that cop's reaction to the 5th amendment invocation was so effeminate and injured lol
"You're not under investigation"
"So right now I'm investigating..."
Yeahhhh... sure I'm not
Lmao, exactly
"Tails you lose, heads I win"
The person filming is not UNDER investigation, the cop is conducting an investigation and asking questions about the person they are looking for. THAT person is under investigation.
@@orlandorolon7338 And the property owner said they would not speak to them and told the officer to leave multiple times. The officer's ass should have been off of the property after the first demand to leave.
You should be able to charge and hold police accountable when they break the law, just like you can charge and hold accountable a private citizen when they break the law.
See US Code Title 18 Section 242! They are not immune!!!
They can,but unfortunately just like priests, the organization prefers to protect them in any manner they can.
Hell I remember this one Sargent who was exposed on philly D when they Held a "suspect" at gun point in a hotel hallway abusing his authority messing with the terrified citizen with un reasonable demands before having him gunned down for "resisting" arrest.
I think his lower rank partner got a slap on the wrist and the Sarge got a free vacation out of the country avoiding all charges.
Kind of why we have them wearing body cams
You can make a citizens arrest. But who will make the cop not shoot you when you try it.
Moreso even, because they come from a position of power and responsibility.
Yeah but too many blind Americans are perfectly okay living in a police state. Just yesterday a police reform bill died in the house, that would address this very issue. Believe it or not, it's okay to support cops while wanting them to be held accountable for violating citizens' rights.
5:53 "how dare you" = you're not under investigation lol
Officer Mark: "Is there an issue?" Home owner: "No, no, no."
ALWAYS file a complaint/persue legal action! We cant let interactions where our rights are clearly being violated go undocumented.
I'm trying to figure out what became of this. Does anybody know? What happened to this officer? Was he charged with trespassing?
WHile i dont disagree--- it is common to face reprocussions for filing a complaint at least where i have lived
@@mikemcg3921 Departmental corruption is a terrifying thing
@@jonburrows2684 No apparently nothing except it got posted on the internet and so far on the way to 5 million views. The elected Sheriff probably not happy with this video being posted for an eternal time.
There should be an app which records a police interaction and streams it to a server where all the different auditors can access it. FB and UA-cam work, but there's no way to see every live stream (or maybe they would suffice).
Notice how much of an attitude the cop had as soon as he realized he was in the wrong. Now imagine some stranger who is not a cop coming onto your property without permission, then getting hostile when told to leave. That's a crime.
110%
after the first off my property..call goes to 911 someone armed is trespassing on my property.door shuts ..better hope that 3a stops the ss109.
Youre allowed to shoot them in a
lot of states, but only if theyve never stepped foot in a police academy, if they have then expect to be laying in a pool of your own blood in prison because the guards got "vengeance"
....if the landowner is black it's probably okay.
@@audrey2658 I'm a retired guard. We don't get "vengeance" for cops. Matter of fact, we don't get along with most of them. They get paid a lot more to only be around violent criminals for a few minutes. We basically had to live with them and be outnumbered 100 to 1. Lol
Nice job guys. Hold these criminals accountable. 💜🇺🇸
It seems people always forget the last amendment that says police have the right to do whatever they want to do 🤨
He told the cop is was his friends car and his friend was in jail, what more did the cop want, that should have concluded his investigation at that place.
YAGOTDATSHITRITE.
@fosterpainter He was being a cloaca?
he came wanting to snoop without a warrent. from the git go he would know that owner was jailed
The car wasn’t registered to him
And both guys should have closed their doors in his face.
Us citizen “im going to exercise my right and not answer any more questons” *cops with oakleys* “alright whats the deal buddy”
I wouldn't say the Oakleys is a good foundation of power, but accurate.
Im not your buddy pal.
@@Marcodiazgrey im not your pal friend
@@branstangsmokes6201 I’m not your friend guy.
@@alexmitchell7083 I'm not your guy friend.
12:10 Refuses to give his badge number then the camera pans to the car where it says "Professionals In Law Enforcement" HAHA
I loved this one.
Confused cop for being calmly checked on his behavior.
Depty was lying, he is on fishing expedition trying build case on man in jail.
seemed that way to me too.
Assumption isn't fact!
@@theangryquad3127 nobody said it was.
🚔🐷 has the power to take a person's Constitutionally Protected Rights at the drop of a dime, any word you say "WILL" be used against you. Never incriminate yourself 🤫 your life "WILL" be investigated
You don’t know how to spell
'How'd you get in here?'
'Through the locked gate is that a problem?'
Uh, yeah. That's called breaking and entering mr. officer.
The officer knew it was wrong... to enter the locked gate! He wasn’t expecting anyone to know their rights!!
There was a chain on the gate not a lock
@@rack391 The Officer said it was a “locked gate” That’s a good question (how did the officer unlock it).
@@elainevankat5353 You may want to go back and listen again the guy said locked the officer said there was a chain on it.
The court can decide if the cop had a right to go through the gate. But the cop did not cut any chains or locks.
There was obviously a chain wrapped around keeping the gate shut that the I guess owner thinks meant Locked.
There is a thing called the Girlscout Rule that would this guy think the same thing if a girlscout selling cookies saw there was no lock and took the chain off and came thru that gate? As I said that would be for a court to decide
@@rack391 I totally agree! (it did seem odd that the officer) would be able to unlock a locked gate. The officer was still an A*s hole!!! Lol
I am huge supporter of law enforcement. It is so upsetting when an officer shot or killed in line of duty. Usually have kids etc. That being said, it is chilling how often they walk all over the very Consitution they are sworn to uphold. The politicans are crapping all over it as well. Millions served, thousands died to protect it, Between the law breakers on the streets, fre lance cops and crooked politicians, we honest folks are getting it coming and going. I keep thinking we will wake up and get our country back.
amen
I actually had a land surveyor say he could legally go anywhere he wants because he was surveying. He was stomping right through the middle of my freshly sown back yard that cost me $2000. Fresh top soil and seeded yard. I was not happy. Cussing at me ensued. Called police and they told them not to walk through the middle of my yard and to stay on the fringes only as needed which is all I wanted.