Quick reminder that a certain celebrity politician trying to get elected to run the government, said he would void parts of the constitution to stay in power after he lost, on his failing social media platform truth social. He also said he wants to give all police federal immunity
The rest of the pigs conspired against Officer Cannon because he was backing the rights of citizens. That is why he got those false charges and later those are dropped. This is what happened for good cops.
I went to the court house to file a complaint and they told me I have know the officers full name and address to do so that his last name and badge number is not enough. I need a lawyer I’m willing to hire out of pocket. Please advise me
The cop that supposedly "seen him cross the line" left the scene in my opinion the stop is over. Because the person who "witnessed" it is gone. Hes no longer detained.
The dude was right... He didnt see any swerving... He didnt see any signs of intoxication. So him demanding a breath test in GA would be unlawful. He was protecting himself and the citizen.
yeah. he sure didn't see any swerving..... because he wasn't even there when it happened. the cop that decided he didn't do anything wrong wasn't even around when that particular incident happened
Bruh really had a tantrum and drove off from his own stop and sped off 😂. Begs the question of whether he was genuinely concerned about the old man’s ability to drive or he was just mad he couldn’t get another arrest.
That cop in the second video did everything wrong. He lied, used excessive force, trespassed on private property, stole that man's phone, called him a dumbass, accused him of dealing drugs, arrested him illegally...and probably more.
Listen to him. He's an off-the-shelf thug from SoFlo. Blame low hiring standards. These departments are recruiting gangbangers with clean records. Dude has the vocabulary and personality of a fucking Twitch streamer.
I love how officer Davis (henceforth referred to as pig) knew he was fucked when the uncle mentioned having the entire interaction on camera, and when the uncle was like “you know you’re screwed, right?” the pig basically immediately ran away. You love to see it.
Not gonna lie I can understand why if the other cop was denying to do his job. While I don't think either cops rating is outrageously wrong, I think it's crazy that the no breathalyser guy got a higher rating despite being completely wrong. In the end, if this guy were to go off the road and kill some kids I don't think justice would have been served.
@@NcHalfrican 3 cops walked into an elevator with a suspect who just shot another officer in the stomach and face. the 3 cops walked out....the suspect was carried out. fun fact one of the leos turned state witness on the other two(one being officer cannon). they all still were allowed to work as leos.
Yeah now he's suing the dept because his white accomplice gets to stay on the force while he was booted. I'm afraid RSCO Deputy of the Year + former marine does not a good cop make.
@@skurdibbles7913no matter the context. If I see a dude shoot my friend in the face out of no where, that close to me, there’s no way I wouldn’t go to work on that guy. Imagine it being in an elevator, have your eardrums ruptured(that’s probably why he’s so loud) and see your homie gone on the floor, if you could contain yourself you’d be a saint. EDIT: READ THIS STATEMENT CAREFULLY. Never once do I condone attacking a handcuffed man. It is a misunderstanding of the scenario and I mistook him to be arrested during the shooting in a confined space. You want to take your anger out on someone so bad but I’m not your mom or your therapist. Learn to read before spewing hate
Faaaacts .. I said the same.. he's definitely a somebody in Miami.. listen to how the cop is explaining to the uncle..😂 and then the uncle says if this was back in the day😂
Because there are no consequences for any of their actions. He snatched the phone as he was planning to record. That's a violation is his 1st ammendment rights, then he assaulted him in violation of his 4th ammendment rights.
Imagine if he was white and victim black. The whole nation would be in uproad (at least according to longnose media) and there would be presidential calls for "justice". Now all we get is deafening silence from the system. When roles are the kind that they are here, it is very much ok for media and those who own the media. They probably get enjoyment out of it, too. If the whole point is to be blind to the race and only judge individuals according to their ACTS, then this kind of ACTING should get the same treatment as if the actor was white. There should be uproar in BOTH cases (not only when the victim is black and perpetrator white) or NONE in either. Current situation is pure opposite of true justice.
The uncle coming to the second stop was excelent. He listened to the entire story of the cop, and then said "I don't believe you. I already watched the video" and calmly explained to the cop he was wrong. He risked getting arrested and beat up himself, but he stood up for right and wrong over threats.
The uncle appeared to have the presence of a true boss. Very calm and chill, listens first and then talks softly yet makes you understand he knows what he's talking about and means what he says. I knew then why he was saying "call my uncle, call my uncle!" in the beginning.
@@Trip_Ts@Trip_Ts Huh? You see the cop approach him. He's standing there looking down at his phone when the cop rips it from his hand and shoved him back FEET. I think if anyone was in anyone's personal space it would be the cop in his. It's crystal clear on the video.
He was 100% trying to gaslight the uncle who had already seen the video. Probably has even worse behavior in his own home considering this is how he acts in public being recorded
Officer cannon was a problem the whole stop and needed to be fired. He said that as in don't argue infront of pedestrians and stop being combative he was NOT saying agree with me!
Managers, commanding officers, nor coworkers should ever dress someone down in front of other employees, customers, or subordinates. It's unprofessional and erodes trust and respect. It happens all the time because people don't know this or don't realize it only reflects poorly on themselves.
He was the Sergeant and when he made the comment about having each other’s back should only apply when you are right in the first place. If this officer was.a supervisor, he needs serious retraining. His ignorance of the law is disturbing for someone with supervising responsibilities. Kudos to the junior officer for calling him out in light of his flawed logic. The only thing the junior officer did wrong was trying to express a different opinion in front of the driver. Praise in public, but reprove in private. One of the least applied skills in leadership is this one. It will keep you from accidentally bruising a sensitive ego and a little bit of public recognition an go a long way.
End qualified immunity, when the department pays for the officers wrong doing, then there is basically no direct punishment for the officer in the wrong
No one would ever want to become a cop out of fear of accidentally doing something that would land them in jail for a long time. I don't disagree with you in theory, but in practice I just don't see a way around qualified immunity. I could be wrong though.
Thats not happening in the states that have removed Qi. The officers still dont pay a dime and are still rarely held accountable for violating people's rights
Even without qualified immunity, they're typically indemnified by the city etc. It's common in police union contracts. So the cops still pay nothing themselves. Also states like Colorado that eliminate QI set very low limits on direct damages. I think it's something like $25k in Colorado.
@@christopherwillson uh yes we do.. there's multiple other channels that covered the other incident along with this one because it involved him. He got fired because of this incident because he was dead ass wrong and made all the officers look stupid on the side of the road. Motor vehicle drivers are absolutely required to submit to a breathalyzer test. If they refuse, they go to jail and get the DUI anyway.
ATA doesn't give anything lower than a C- unless laws are broken, rights violated, or really aggregations behavior or actions . The officer didn't do anything legally wrong, but the tantrum acting like a baby puts him in C territory 😅
I bet they fired Officer Cannon for informing the other cops that what they're is unlawful and he won't take part in violating the citizen's rights. Not immediately falling in line with the thin blue line is a grave offense for a cop.
I don’t know how anyone could defend Officer Cannon. They received multiple calls that the man was swerving all over the road. The other officer witnessed him swerve. The man lied about not drinking any alcohol. Then later says he had “1 beer”. That’s a lawful stop. There’s absolutely reasonable suspicion that the man was drunk. The only way you can defend this is if you support drunk driving.
what? he didn't even know which rights citizens has, this not a good cop example, just thing if after that stop the driver had an accident with victims
Cannon didn't see any swerving. Neither did the sergeant. They were just going by what the cop that left said. Since he left in a huff he was probably lying.
They're almost right when they say it It's actually backwards logic: they need the arrest ex post facto to justify the violence they already chose to inflict. Because, they're supposed to have legal justification for their use of force, they'll look really silly going hands on and then declining charges thereafter.
In the first clip, you point out that Georgia gives 5th Am protections when it comes to alco-sensors, you then give Officer Cannon a C+ for correctly pointing this out. Maybe I missed something.
Honestly he deserved an F for interfering with an investigation of a serious offense. Sure, the man can refuse the breathalyzer, but there was absolutely reasonable suspicion to believe he was drunk. Citizens called in to report his erratic driving. He lied, said he had nothing to drink, then a few minutes later admitted to having “1 beer”. So, at the very least he would either have to perform a field sobriety test, or be brought in. Drunk driving is very dangerous. No doubt this man will continue to drink and drive because Officer Cannon basically told him it was totally acceptable.
I think Canon deserves a better grade. The cop who drove away made it sound like the driver had to do the breathalyzer. Officer Canon, especially after the 1st cop left, had no proof of the driver’s behavior. Officer Canon was making it very clear he was uncomfortable with what was occurring.
I agree, he didn't say that the officer's couldn't use the breathalyzer, he asked if the driver would consent to it. His analysis of Federal constitutional law may have been wrong, but he came to the correct conclusion under George law. It is also not his fault that the initiating officer had too short of a temper. I also don't see any problem in an officer questioning the judgement or orders of their fellow officers while on the scene, if they have the time (such as not being in a grave or dangerous situation), I thought that was what all the audit channels were advocating for.
yo that grandpa is the most chill grandpa you're ever gonna meet.. seen stuff you couldn't imagine and still right with god... you are blessed to be in his presence.. and please buy him his beer of choice
Uncle had the video evidence of exactly what happened. I hope the settlement was for alot of money. But that officer needs to be removed. Violating first amendment rights and assaulting and arresting are egregious acts.
Here in New Zealand it's much simpler they just use a sniffer test and if it picks up alcohol on your breath then they give you a breathalyzer which is compulsory.
The Civil Rights Lawyer also discussed this video. The cop trying to make sure everything about the stop was on the up and up got fired for this stop. The cop that abandoning the stop just because the other cop asked some questions about it call a supervisor while in the car as he was driving off. You can criticize him for arguing with another cop in front of people if you want, but the fact that he got fired for this while other cops shoot people, give people concussions, and get put on administrative leave for a little bit and keep their jobs is telling.
@Adventist1997 Protecting someone's rights doesn't really apply here. The guy was seen swerving by an officer. Got a call he was swerving. The driver even admitted to drinking and driving 🙄 So the way ATA put it, it's affordable to stand up for citizens rights, but should be now knowledgeable. He also stated the officer was condescending to the officer on the scene, as well as arguing with his supervisor in front of citizens. So since nothing was done illegally it's not an F/D, but it can't be a B because he was wrong in his assertions, asking to alkysensor doesn't violate rights when the driver admitted to drinking.
@@faytleingod1851 Admitting to having a drink isn't the same as being drunk. Or did you just ignore that fact? 🤭 The cop that witnessed the event left, so all they had at that point was hearsay. They didn't have his body cam or anything, but I guess you ignored that too... 🙄 Disagreeing with a supervisor isn't inherently bad especially when they want to make sure an Innocent person isn't put in jail. We need more cops that are willing to stand up for citizens. Imagine how many innocent lives could have been saved if the cowardly cops standing by would have spoken up like this dude!
Cops are always claiming that people “attack” them. It is really just sick that they are allowed to do this to citizens. He took the man downtown, held him for 8 hours only to un-arrest him?
Are you serious? That cop had every right to defend himself from that man. He had a dangerous weapon in his hands. Didn't you see him about to use the flash on his phone to blind the cop? We're all lucky he reacted so quickly
I think police should automatically have to pay 100 $ out of pocket per minute for any kidnapping. i.e. Any time an arrest is made that does not result in charges filed. That way, they cannot get away with punishing us for exercising our rights. I bet they would quickly learn how to do their jobs correctly.
@@Zaekyr that woulf have a chilling effect on LE. Just make them have insurance like doctors. If they violate rights, the premiums increase. If they can't get one, they can't work
That second officer was so out of line it's unbelievable! He absolutely escalated that situation for no reason. He tried HARD to justify what he did. They were on their own property and nowhere near the scene he was filming
For the 2nd video. The real question should be, why is someone with a gun and potential possibility of roid ragging be showing up for a medical emergency?
Side note. A recent Georgia TV station revealed that in the past 5 years, Georgia cops/Leo's were convicted of 290 dui's. Begs to question how many police were given blue line privilege and allowed to go free.
The cop is a lying POS!! He arrested him because he knew he messed up 🤬 That guys had every right to record it!! We need to record them for our safety!! Why wasn't his body cam on from the beginning? !!
Hense why the officer lost his qualified immunity. His conduct was so grossly inconsistent with the law a reasonable person would know that theft and battery are criminal offense.
@@samkdaily3055 I don't really care that he loses qualified immunity. He doesn't pay the settlement, he isn't criminally charged for assault, and he's still likely working as an officer.
@@Sashinator0 Without qualified immunity, he can be found guilty in a civil trial and be ordered to pay damages. Having said that, he can say he doesn't have the money but, he'll have to prove that repeatedly, potentially for the rest of his life.(best case scenario) New Mexico has abolished QA by the way.
@@feloniouscraphammer according to the institute for justice, only 0.41% of cases in which qualified immunity is overcome involve the government worker contributing to the payout. The officer may be the one civilly liable but the police dept or the city often have insurance policies that they'll use to pay it off for the officer.
@@Sashinator0 Like I said, "best case scenario". Regardless of who pays, qualified immunity covers pretty much all government employees and officials and is used to deny "justice", how ever you choose to define it.
I am ssoooo thrilled to see this black officer uphold the constitution ❤. Offlcer if you see this comment; we need more officers like you! This footage should be used around the country for training purposes. Thank you sir for your fantastic service 💯
Yeah the grading in the first video was all bizarre. Cop who drove off should’ve got a F, the cop who didn’t violate the man’s rights should’ve got a B at least.
Eh, I mean at least all he did was drive off - He didn’t take his anger out on the citizen. Maybe it was kinda dumb but at least it wasn’t massively harmful.
I feel like there needs to be a D grade for cases like this. It’s fine for the F grade to be reserved for cops whose actions are straight up unconstitutional, excessively violent etc, there needs to be a grade between that and a C- for cops whose actions are “technically not illegal but unprofessional to the point of bringing the department into disrepute”.
Applause to the first black officer that upheld the constitution and the law. We need more LEOs like him. I need to go back and get his name bc his sector needs to know he's a valued figure in police enforcement
Officer Cannon is showing that he is improving as an individual amd as a police officer. This is the kind of performance WE WANT and should be encouraging in our law enforcement officers. Fact is that educating people on what there rights are is needed when other cops make requests sound like orders. I'd give him an A.
So officer Davis lost qualified immunity and the suit was dropped after a settlement was reached. So.... he had to pay out of pocket for this. That's nice
It is not out of Mr. Davis's pocket. Losing qualified immunity means that the case can go forward. Winning the civil case means that whoever indemnifies Mr. Davis pays the penalty (like an insurance company, the city, the police department, all of which actually means the taxpayers pay). There are some exceptions to this such as if Mr. Davis were criminally liable as well as civilly liable.
And we all lived happily ever after.. jokes aside, if more of them actually had to pay out of pocket for their crimes against us then perhaps there would actually exist "the good cops"
*NEVER tell them what you have on camera.* Let them make their official statement, and preferably _testify_ to that behavior before you confront their perjury. It's much better when they must fabricate a narrative from their own imagination rather than frame the lie with as much supporting evidence as they can gather.
Cannon what a cool name for a cop!!! He deserves an A because he definitely showed compassion and humility which has been lacking in most publized encounters
Cannon was wrong. Of course he can! A citizen called it in because he was all over the road and he admitted to driving. He can't force him, but he can arrest him and draw blood to test.
Yeah, that first cop was angry because he wanted to bust this man,,, and the new officer showed that he was an actual follower of laws. So the first cop was not gonna be able to manufacture a reason in the presence of the new guy.
@@erich6860 As soon as he arrived "Hey your cam is upsidedown" instantly showing thats hes better than 99% of cops we see not holding each other accountable
If the person that stopped him leaves the scene and is the only witness to the reasonable suspicion of him driving under the influence then its over with.
He said he couldn’t force the driver to submit to a breathalyzer and told the supervisor that it was unlawful to tell the driver he couldn’t operate the vehicle. That’s why he got fired? Insane
C+ for a police officer that did his job properly... Audit the Audit definitely drops his pants every time he sees his daddies on the road... Great job 👍👏
@@faytleingod1851 1) Having a drink and then driving isn't against the law; a single drink is not enough for almost any adult male to be even close to impaired enough to where driving would be unsafe 2) You are absolutely within your rights to refuse a breathalyzer test, and that refusal to do so is NOT evidence in and of itself of incriminating behavior. "He didn't want to answer whether he robbed that bank, so he must've robbed it!" is almost exactly what you're suggesting
@@boonsaplenty3924 your right about one thing, it's not illegal to drink and drive within the legal limit. If we used your way of thinking then you could never arrest anyone for drink driving 😂 if everyone who drank and swerved all over the road refused a breathalyzer and said "welp I guess your free to go." If you refuse a breath test typically they take you in for a blood draw if they have probably cause.... Which they did. I should also point out if you refuse a breath test even if the blood test shows legal limit, you still get your license suspended in most states. The bank robbery metaphor is a weak argument. a bank gets robbed, suspect confirms they were at the bank but didn't rob it. Witness account says that's the guy. Gun matches video surveillance.(Even though let's say it's legal to open carry) "Well guys he said he didn't do it let him go" according to you. Your completely missing the probably cause in both instances. Without probably cause, let's say they pulled him over for a light being out and he says he had one beer. Then yes they can't bring him in for refusing to test, as there was no reason to believe he was intoxicated.
In Ontario (and I believe across Canada too) it is illegal to refuse a roadside breathalyzer test and officers are allowed to request a breath sample absent probable cause.
In the second video, the cop is simply beyond evil, I have never seen such a cop before. He is pure evil and how he communicated with the detainee and refused to help him
I love it. Look how emotionally stunted and immature those cops are. They can't even handle a mild discussion if everyone doesn't tow the same line. They're babies!
That 2nd cop sounded like he was spun out tweeking. If that's how normally speaks and acts he still shouldn't be a cop it's an escalation waiting to happen. His energy is dangerous for his job. He is going to get someone hurt or dead.
That's not the definition of a right. You also have a right to own firearms... until you're in prison. You can't own a gun in prison despite the 2nd amendment. It's not even a question. A lot of your rights are taken away in prison.
@crazyrobots6565 Rights can't be taken without due process. In order to perform a search there can be only two reasons. One a warrant being issued to perform a search after probable cause or suspicion is established. The second would be a pat down for weapons to protect officers who are concerned about personal safety. Understand though to suspend a right constitutionally there must be due process. Only after you have been allowed to face your accusers and allowed to mount a legal defense and face the accusations that necessitates a suspension of your liberty. Don't forget that there must be a process followed and there must be a lawful and legitimate reason for the suspension. Whether it be temporary or permament.
On the first one you keep coming back to "the driver's exhibited driving behavior" for how you judge the second officer. Neither that second officer nor the supervisor witnessed the driving behavior. The only officer who did see it already said he wasn't pursuing a DUI because he didn't like that they had him working nights and then left. So where would the cops that didn't witness his driving be getting the probable cause to compel a breath test?
Yeah exactly my takeaway too. The only person I'm giving a C or below to is ATA themselves. It's just lazy work to take the word of something not present in the footage. If you are gonna properly weigh on these situations then what the cops claim to be true shouldn't matter. To say Officer Cannon was in the wrong to not escalate the situation is literally advocating for police to use excessive force as long as they get permission from a supervisor.
@@kyo1546thank you! I knew I felt funny listening to ATA’s description of the driver. It almost felt like he was profiling the guy tbh. But the only one who saw him must’ve not thought it was that bad if he just drove away.
@thesuperdingos Yeah he never questions the first officer claiming the guy was swerving even tho there is literally no evidence of this. He can't even note where the guy swerved or any specific details and there is NO dashcam footage, why?
@seeya205 Nope, the video addresses this directly it's willful ignorance to claim this. The law states there must be proof of lack of control NOT proof that they've had a drink. The guy was coherent, he was able to stand just fine, he knew where he was, where he was going, what he was doing, and why. There was no indication he was under the influence whatsoever. It's extra jarring compared to the second clip where AtA points out how the footage is manipulated to make the officer look better due to the officer muting it as convenient for himself, and him not recording the original altercation. Somehow this isn't extended to the first case where the same conditions are present. This isn't even about the conduct of the cops specifically at this point. If AtA wants to be a trusted source for these things the channel has to remain impartial to what the viewers can see so we are all on the same page. This first clip doesn't clear that bar at all.
Thank you for being here. I hope you have an awesome week! You know what to do!
My week is going well my snowbunny making pancakes as we speak
Quick reminder that a certain celebrity politician trying to get elected to run the government, said he would void parts of the constitution to stay in power after he lost, on his failing social media platform truth social. He also said he wants to give all police federal immunity
Double feature my back pocket.
The rest of the pigs conspired against Officer Cannon because he was backing the rights of citizens. That is why he got those false charges and later those are dropped. This is what happened for good cops.
I went to the court house to file a complaint and they told me I have know the officers full name and address to do so that his last name and badge number is not enough. I need a lawyer I’m willing to hire out of pocket. Please advise me
The cop that supposedly "seen him cross the line" left the scene in my opinion the stop is over. Because the person who "witnessed" it is gone. Hes no longer detained.
Agreed 👍🏻 the stop should be over. 💯
Agreed 1000%
But the big cop who had to be told to put his body cam on wants blood.
It's because his co-worker was arguing with him. He got upset and left. Though I wouldn't have left, I'd have told him to finish the investigation.
@@stevenveilleux4791it was upside down. Is that worse than not having it on?
Who else kept hearing "Alka-Seltzer"?
I think it was alco-sensor. I made this reply before I saw it written on screen.
🙋🏻
Sumwon was axking for alkao seltser
Why didn't they call the ambalams?
Me
Respect to the officer standing up for that man’s rights. There’s not enough of that in most PDs
Seems like he violated someone's rights before and didn't want to do it again this time. That's what accountability does.
But he was wrong. It’s disturbing how incompetent that guy is.
@@2tonecapone585 Standing up for a drink driver. Are you crazy🤪
@@mick9419 Drunk guys have civil rights.😅
You must have missed all of the narrators analysis lol
in 100% of situations, it's better for a police officer to over-protect a citizen's rights than it is to potentially violate their rights.
It never happens though. It’s sad :(
And ata censured him for it. What a clown.
No shit
@@jackcommonman1381 don’t be a hater bro. The comment section is for any comments you may have 😂
@@travisnicholas5220 if only common sense was actually... Common;)
That is the first time I have ever seen a cop say that is unlawful and I will have no part of it. Congratuations to you officer.
There was a time when Ata would have lauded that. It seems that time has passed.
*ex-officer
But he was wrong
Ata has become much more of a boot licker
I think that Cannon guy was one of "us" 😂😂
The dude was right... He didnt see any swerving... He didnt see any signs of intoxication. So him demanding a breath test in GA would be unlawful. He was protecting himself and the citizen.
Dude couldn't even stand up 😂 what do you mean?
yeah. he sure didn't see any swerving..... because he wasn't even there when it happened. the cop that decided he didn't do anything wrong wasn't even around when that particular incident happened
Bruh really had a tantrum and drove off from his own stop and sped off 😂. Begs the question of whether he was genuinely concerned about the old man’s ability to drive or he was just mad he couldn’t get another arrest.
The only thing he was concerned about, is giving the black man a ticket or arresting him
He prop saw the other officer As a cockblock 😂
@@ericbassett6389💯
The second one 😂
A chance to ticket or arrest a black man is hard for him to pass up
That cop in the second video did everything wrong. He lied, used excessive force, trespassed on private property, stole that man's phone, called him a dumbass, accused him of dealing drugs, arrested him illegally...and probably more.
I'm still trying to figure out what crime he was being arrested for, if he resisted lawful arrest.
Listen to him. He's an off-the-shelf thug from SoFlo. Blame low hiring standards. These departments are recruiting gangbangers with clean records. Dude has the vocabulary and personality of a fucking Twitch streamer.
@@enniebudygang members don't need a reason to assault you. They gotta make sure you know who runs the streets.
“Give me his ID bruh” 🤦♂️
Honestly this just maimi. He ain’t mean nothing by it 😂
I love how officer Davis (henceforth referred to as pig) knew he was fucked when the uncle mentioned having the entire interaction on camera, and when the uncle was like “you know you’re screwed, right?” the pig basically immediately ran away. You love to see it.
Wait did the cop just drives off from his own stop? Don’t think I’ve ever seen that before.
CAUSE HE WAS TRYING TO BE FUNNY
Ego trip lol they all have such a huge ego they have to be right about everything and can’t be questioned.
hands down, me neither
Considering that's what you saw with your eyeballs and it's in the title/thumbnail, I'd say there's no reason to answer you.
Not gonna lie I can understand why if the other cop was denying to do his job.
While I don't think either cops rating is outrageously wrong, I think it's crazy that the no breathalyser guy got a higher rating despite being completely wrong. In the end, if this guy were to go off the road and kill some kids I don't think justice would have been served.
Cannon got in trouble for messing up that guy in the elevator, he didn’t want to get in trouble again for violating someone’s rights lol I respect it.
What’s the story on the elevator?
@@NcHalfrican 3 cops walked into an elevator with a suspect who just shot another officer in the stomach and face. the 3 cops walked out....the suspect was carried out. fun fact one of the leos turned state witness on the other two(one being officer cannon). they all still were allowed to work as leos.
Yeah now he's suing the dept because his white accomplice gets to stay on the force while he was booted.
I'm afraid RSCO Deputy of the Year + former marine does not a good cop make.
@@skurdibbles7913 Valuable context for how Cannon was acting in this video, thank you
@@skurdibbles7913no matter the context. If I see a dude shoot my friend in the face out of no where, that close to me, there’s no way I wouldn’t go to work on that guy. Imagine it being in an elevator, have your eardrums ruptured(that’s probably why he’s so loud) and see your homie gone on the floor, if you could contain yourself you’d be a saint.
EDIT: READ THIS STATEMENT CAREFULLY. Never once do I condone attacking a handcuffed man. It is a misunderstanding of the scenario and I mistook him to be arrested during the shooting in a confined space. You want to take your anger out on someone so bad but I’m not your mom or your therapist. Learn to read before spewing hate
I don't know who the "Uncle" was in the second video, but he gives off major "mess with me at your own risk" vibes.
Faaaacts .. I said the same.. he's definitely a somebody in Miami.. listen to how the cop is explaining to the uncle..😂 and then the uncle says if this was back in the day😂
My favorite part of the first one , "Your body camera's upside down"
probably did it on purpose.
That's a sign of impairment lol
The cop in the second clip was so massively unprofessional, ignorant, and a total psycho.
He’s just a thug with a badge.
Probably a little sassy Democrat
@@BenFardinlmao ok fascist "I don't like this person they must be the opposing political party"
@@lukereyes6266 ok fascist ☝️🤓
@@lukereyes6266Sounds benfardin is right it’s Sounds more the Demoncrats.
Bearded Unc was very calm, just let the cop say a fake story. Cop talked himself into a shitter😂
Everyone needs an uncle like that 😂
😂😂😂yup
Officer Davis was out of control and lied from the beginning.
He sounded like he was on meth, talking super-fast and kept interrupting.
He was Def on something
Because there are no consequences for any of their actions. He snatched the phone as he was planning to record. That's a violation is his 1st ammendment rights, then he assaulted him in violation of his 4th ammendment rights.
Imagine if he was white and victim black. The whole nation would be in uproad (at least according to longnose media) and there would be presidential calls for "justice". Now all we get is deafening silence from the system. When roles are the kind that they are here, it is very much ok for media and those who own the media. They probably get enjoyment out of it, too.
If the whole point is to be blind to the race and only judge individuals according to their ACTS, then this kind of ACTING should get the same treatment as if the actor was white. There should be uproar in BOTH cases (not only when the victim is black and perpetrator white) or NONE in either. Current situation is pure opposite of true justice.
He’s exactly the type you wanna hear about that got crept up on real quiet and left him there.
The uncle coming to the second stop was excelent.
He listened to the entire story of the cop, and then said "I don't believe you. I already watched the video" and calmly explained to the cop he was wrong.
He risked getting arrested and beat up himself, but he stood up for right and wrong over threats.
Uncle seems to me to be someone, in that neighborhood, you don't mess with. I'm not saying he's "connected" but I'm not saying he's not...
The uncle appeared to have the presence of a true boss. Very calm and chill, listens first and then talks softly yet makes you understand he knows what he's talking about and means what he says. I knew then why he was saying "call my uncle, call my uncle!" in the beginning.
@@cdogsixty-nine2674He's an auditor
He was also being aggressive and getting in the uncle’s space. He wanted the uncle to react.
In the second clip, not to mention that some supervisor told the cop twice to leave.
That fast-talking cop in the second clip is a true psychopath. I'm calling it.
Yep, Mr ghetto cop should not be on that side of the law
Denzel in training day
Stereotypical attitude of his ilk
Any cop who orders someone to stop recording them, needs to go to jail. "Go directly to jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200."
Lol, "Do not collect $admin-leave."
The second video, sheesh, since when are we not allowed to record? Officer Chris Tucker just ambushed the guy right away.
the guy kept going into the cop personal space although he shouldn't have approach the cammer.
@@Trip_Ts@Trip_Ts Huh? You see the cop approach him. He's standing there looking down at his phone when the cop rips it from his hand and shoved him back FEET. I think if anyone was in anyone's personal space it would be the cop in his. It's crystal clear on the video.
that's an easy lawsuit and he shouldn't settle. It's a 1st amendment violation, 2 4th amendment violations, and a 1st amendment retaliation.
I would put money on the fact the pignorant lil b' is about 5' tall and was picked on in school.
LE behavior was criminal
Mr. Ghandours uncle is a boss and that deputy knew it immediately. You can tell in his demeanor as well as the way he annunciated so matter of factly.
I love that uncle! Everyone should be so lucky to have an uncle like that in their corner when life goes sideways!
Bro he wouldn't give the cop the satisfaction of being looked at 😂 23:21
The cop is thinking we can attack the public because there is no accountability.
They think they are untouchable when they wear that uniform.
He was 100% trying to gaslight the uncle who had already seen the video. Probably has even worse behavior in his own home considering this is how he acts in public being recorded
@NoRemorse81 they basically are untouchable. They attack people and commit crimes and never have any consequences
"thinking"? ... nah he knows nothing will happen
@@Zacharyr222well he’s black
Thanks for the shoutout John! You and Lack are the gold standard! Excellent job as usual 🙏❤️
The cop saying " We're here to back each other" said it all for me. In other words it doesn't matter if they are right or wrong.
Officer cannon was a problem the whole stop and needed to be fired. He said that as in don't argue infront of pedestrians and stop being combative he was NOT saying agree with me!
Managers, commanding officers, nor coworkers should ever dress someone down in front of other employees, customers, or subordinates. It's unprofessional and erodes trust and respect. It happens all the time because people don't know this or don't realize it only reflects poorly on themselves.
Fundamental misunderstanding of what he was trying to communicate
@@garretts5507
You're delusional and in denial as usual with the majority of PINK amerikkklan citizens
He was the Sergeant and when he made the comment about having each other’s back should only apply when you are right in the first place. If this officer was.a supervisor, he needs serious retraining. His ignorance of the law is disturbing for someone with supervising responsibilities.
Kudos to the junior officer for calling him out in light of his flawed logic. The only thing the junior officer did wrong was trying to express a different opinion in front of the driver. Praise in public, but reprove in private. One of the least applied skills in leadership is this one. It will keep you from accidentally bruising a sensitive ego and a little bit of public recognition an go a long way.
End qualified immunity, when the department pays for the officers wrong doing, then there is basically no direct punishment for the officer in the wrong
Its not the department paying. Its tax payers. We are on the hook.
No one would ever want to become a cop out of fear of accidentally doing something that would land them in jail for a long time.
I don't disagree with you in theory, but in practice I just don't see a way around qualified immunity. I could be wrong though.
Thats not happening in the states that have removed Qi. The officers still dont pay a dime and are still rarely held accountable for violating people's rights
@@-redacted_by_youtubewe should be on the hook. We elected these clowns ….
Even without qualified immunity, they're typically indemnified by the city etc. It's common in police union contracts. So the cops still pay nothing themselves. Also states like Colorado that eliminate QI set very low limits on direct damages. I think it's something like $25k in Colorado.
7 mins in and I can't quite believe the collective incompetence of all 3 officers on scene. Each is utterly unfit in their own special way.
I mean the third cop handled the situation well, you have to remember that that he arrived later at the scene
The amount of "copsplaining" going on indicates the cop knew he was in the wrong.
Cannon was wrong...he got fired for it.
@@GSP-76 Not true at all lol
@@GSP-76 You don't know why he was fired.
@@christopherwillson uh yes we do.. there's multiple other channels that covered the other incident along with this one because it involved him. He got fired because of this incident because he was dead ass wrong and made all the officers look stupid on the side of the road. Motor vehicle drivers are absolutely required to submit to a breathalyzer test. If they refuse, they go to jail and get the DUI anyway.
@@GSP-76 Oh ok, fair enough. This video didn't mention the firing was related so it looked like you were just making it up.
A C- for deserting your own traffic stop? Seems pretty generous
He didn’t beat anyone. It’s a curve grading.
How about gettin C+ for defending drunk driver from law? Seems pretty absurd to be honest.
ATA doesn't give anything lower than a C- unless laws are broken, rights violated, or really aggregations behavior or actions .
The officer didn't do anything legally wrong, but the tantrum acting like a baby puts him in C territory 😅
yeah this was a rare L on this channel
@@vidura you don't know whether he was drunk.
I bet they fired Officer Cannon for informing the other cops that what they're is unlawful and he won't take part in violating the citizen's rights. Not immediately falling in line with the thin blue line is a grave offense for a cop.
Did you hear the lawyer saying Officer Cannon was wrong?
They did fire him
I don’t know how anyone could defend Officer Cannon.
They received multiple calls that the man was swerving all over the road.
The other officer witnessed him swerve.
The man lied about not drinking any alcohol. Then later says he had “1 beer”.
That’s a lawful stop. There’s absolutely reasonable suspicion that the man was drunk.
The only way you can defend this is if you support drunk driving.
The black cop in the first video was the biggest advocate of a citizens rights I’ve ever seen on this channel.
yeah, and he got lambasted by the clown who narrated this video...🤦🏿♂
@@negative949 I didnt get this perception but hey thats fine
@@negative949what blud on about
Yeah until you see the video of the same cop at the end of the video
what? he didn't even know which rights citizens has, this not a good cop example, just thing if after that stop the driver had an accident with victims
Cannon didn't see any swerving. Neither did the sergeant. They were just going by what the cop that left said. Since he left in a huff he was probably lying.
He did hear the driver admit to drinking and driving.
@@seeya205 yet he didn't try to use that to get the test. He used swerving.
He likely left, because Cannon pulled skill rank, saying I'm the most experienced one here lol.
If that's the case, you take over.
The cop in the second video is a insane liar and has no business being in law enforcement. He literally said i can’t let him go cuz he hurt.
They're almost right when they say it
It's actually backwards logic: they need the arrest ex post facto to justify the violence they already chose to inflict. Because, they're supposed to have legal justification for their use of force, they'll look really silly going hands on and then declining charges thereafter.
The way the 2nd officer’s voice changed when he knew he was caught.
The officer who left the scene needs some anger management classes! 😡
And the officer who has no idea what he’s talking about should’ve never been hired in the first place
He needs to NOT BE A COP !!!!
@@yourdad1367yeah, typical low IQ dei hire
In the first clip, you point out that Georgia gives 5th Am protections when it comes to alco-sensors, you then give Officer Cannon a C+ for correctly pointing this out. Maybe I missed something.
Honestly he deserved an F for interfering with an investigation of a serious offense.
Sure, the man can refuse the breathalyzer, but there was absolutely reasonable suspicion to believe he was drunk. Citizens called in to report his erratic driving. He lied, said he had nothing to drink, then a few minutes later admitted to having “1 beer”. So, at the very least he would either have to perform a field sobriety test, or be brought in.
Drunk driving is very dangerous. No doubt this man will continue to drink and drive because Officer Cannon basically told him it was totally acceptable.
Getting that ID, is like crack for police…
HEY THATS MY LINE!!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Gotta check em warrants.. Gimme gimme gimme a full name and address I HAVE to check some warrants *RIGHT NOW* .. Help a sister out man..
😂😂😂 @@lyylimiranda9624
I think Canon deserves a better grade.
The cop who drove away made it sound like the driver had to do the breathalyzer. Officer Canon, especially after the 1st cop left, had no proof of the driver’s behavior. Officer Canon was making it very clear he was uncomfortable with what was occurring.
I agree, he didn't say that the officer's couldn't use the breathalyzer, he asked if the driver would consent to it. His analysis of Federal constitutional law may have been wrong, but he came to the correct conclusion under George law. It is also not his fault that the initiating officer had too short of a temper. I also don't see any problem in an officer questioning the judgement or orders of their fellow officers while on the scene, if they have the time (such as not being in a grave or dangerous situation), I thought that was what all the audit channels were advocating for.
yo that grandpa is the most chill grandpa you're ever gonna meet.. seen stuff you couldn't imagine and still right with god... you are blessed to be in his presence.. and please buy him his beer of choice
There is no scenario where any officer should be able to mute or turn off their body cameras
Agreed it should be considered destruction of evidence if they do
Uncle got the cops tone to change, we should all have an uncle that imposing at our back
Loved him, he was a true badass.
Uncle had the video evidence of exactly what happened. I hope the settlement was for alot of money. But that officer needs to be removed. Violating first amendment rights and assaulting and arresting are egregious acts.
Cop was spun.
Here in New Zealand it's much simpler they just use a sniffer test and if it picks up alcohol on your breath then they give you a breathalyzer which is compulsory.
The Civil Rights Lawyer also discussed this video. The cop trying to make sure everything about the stop was on the up and up got fired for this stop.
The cop that abandoning the stop just because the other cop asked some questions about it call a supervisor while in the car as he was driving off.
You can criticize him for arguing with another cop in front of people if you want, but the fact that he got fired for this while other cops shoot people, give people concussions, and get put on administrative leave for a little bit and keep their jobs is telling.
Gangs don't give a shit if their members act in the best interest of the public, all they care about is protecting their own.
It's crazy how OUTSTANDING and OUT OF THIS WORLD it seems for everyone involved, when a police officer actually protects a citizens right.
And he got a C for it. Almost the same grade as the cop with a temper tantrum who got a C-. Totally accurate and helpful grading system… 😂
He wasn’t protecting a “citizen” he was covering up for a fellow Black man. This video simply illustrates another kind of corruption.
@@Adventist1997fr, and ATA was talking about how they were condescending? Like what?
@Adventist1997
Protecting someone's rights doesn't really apply here.
The guy was seen swerving by an officer. Got a call he was swerving. The driver even admitted to drinking and driving 🙄
So the way ATA put it, it's affordable to stand up for citizens rights, but should be now knowledgeable. He also stated the officer was condescending to the officer on the scene, as well as arguing with his supervisor in front of citizens.
So since nothing was done illegally it's not an F/D, but it can't be a B because he was wrong in his assertions, asking to alkysensor doesn't violate rights when the driver admitted to drinking.
@@faytleingod1851
Admitting to having a drink isn't the same as being drunk. Or did you just ignore that fact? 🤭 The cop that witnessed the event left, so all they had at that point was hearsay. They didn't have his body cam or anything, but I guess you ignored that too... 🙄 Disagreeing with a supervisor isn't inherently bad especially when they want to make sure an Innocent person isn't put in jail. We need more cops that are willing to stand up for citizens. Imagine how many innocent lives could have been saved if the cowardly cops standing by would have spoken up like this dude!
thank y'all southern gentlemen for looking out for each other... God bless you...
Cops are always claiming that people “attack” them. It is really just sick that they are allowed to do this to citizens.
He took the man downtown, held him for 8 hours only to un-arrest him?
Are you serious? That cop had every right to defend himself from that man. He had a dangerous weapon in his hands. Didn't you see him about to use the flash on his phone to blind the cop? We're all lucky he reacted so quickly
I think police should automatically have to pay 100 $ out of pocket per minute for any kidnapping. i.e. Any time an arrest is made that does not result in charges filed. That way, they cannot get away with punishing us for exercising our rights. I bet they would quickly learn how to do their jobs correctly.
@@Zaekyr that woulf have a chilling effect on LE. Just make them have insurance like doctors. If they violate rights, the premiums increase. If they can't get one, they can't work
@@gabrote42 maybe you haven’t noticed, but police in this country absolutely need to chill.
The point is to make the cops pay out of pocket enough that they stop breaking the law @@gabrote42
Sounds like Cannon learned his lesson, but his new dept. was not ready to learn it yet.
That second officer was so out of line it's unbelievable! He absolutely escalated that situation for no reason. He tried HARD to justify what he did. They were on their own property and nowhere near the scene he was filming
For the 2nd video. The real question should be, why is someone with a gun and potential possibility of roid ragging be showing up for a medical emergency?
Side note. A recent Georgia TV station revealed that in the past 5 years, Georgia cops/Leo's were convicted of 290 dui's. Begs to question how many police were given blue line privilege and allowed to go free.
If they were convicted, they weren't off scott free. LMFAO!
29,000, is my guess.
PIGS don't drink and drive. They never do that cuz its dangerous and unlawful. WAIT i stand corrected. No laws apply to PIGS. WTF was I thinking.
Seriously? WOW! I’m amazed your DAs actually did something. Here you get charged if they hit you.
Right, if 290 were too bad to sweep under the rug, how many were truly found to be driving drunk but were given special treatment?
I give him an F for pulling someone over for being too black.
Seeing a good cop should not feel this foreign.
@kccustom1, Best comment award. It should have hundred of thousands of likes.
The old cop that looked like they last person I would picture as a cop was the best one on the scene.
The cop is a lying POS!! He arrested him because he knew he messed up 🤬 That guys had every right to record it!! We need to record them for our safety!! Why wasn't his body cam on from the beginning? !!
Hense why the officer lost his qualified immunity. His conduct was so grossly inconsistent with the law a reasonable person would know that theft and battery are criminal offense.
@@samkdaily3055 I don't really care that he loses qualified immunity. He doesn't pay the settlement, he isn't criminally charged for assault, and he's still likely working as an officer.
@@Sashinator0 Without qualified immunity, he can be found guilty in a civil trial and be ordered to pay damages. Having said that, he can say he doesn't have the money but, he'll have to prove that repeatedly, potentially for the rest of his life.(best case scenario)
New Mexico has abolished QA by the way.
@@feloniouscraphammer according to the institute for justice, only 0.41% of cases in which qualified immunity is overcome involve the government worker contributing to the payout. The officer may be the one civilly liable but the police dept or the city often have insurance policies that they'll use to pay it off for the officer.
@@Sashinator0 Like I said, "best case scenario". Regardless of who pays, qualified immunity covers pretty much all government employees and officials and is used to deny "justice", how ever you choose to define it.
I am ssoooo thrilled to see this black officer uphold the constitution ❤. Offlcer if you see this comment; we need more officers like you! This footage should be used around the country for training purposes. Thank you sir for your fantastic service 💯
😅😂😅😂
Abandons a traffic stop and gets a C-. Bruh
Yeah the grading in the first video was all bizarre. Cop who drove off should’ve got a F, the cop who didn’t violate the man’s rights should’ve got a B at least.
Eh, I mean at least all he did was drive off - He didn’t take his anger out on the citizen. Maybe it was kinda dumb but at least it wasn’t massively harmful.
I feel like there needs to be a D grade for cases like this. It’s fine for the F grade to be reserved for cops whose actions are straight up unconstitutional, excessively violent etc, there needs to be a grade between that and a C- for cops whose actions are “technically not illegal but unprofessional to the point of bringing the department into disrepute”.
Imagine your surgeon just has tantrum an leaves lmao
Apparently driving off from a stop because you're a man-baby is just slightly below average for a police office according to AtA
Applause to the first black officer that upheld the constitution and the law. We need more LEOs like him. I need to go back and get his name bc his sector needs to know he's a valued figure in police enforcement
Officer Cannon is showing that he is improving as an individual amd as a police officer. This is the kind of performance WE WANT and should be encouraging in our law enforcement officers. Fact is that educating people on what there rights are is needed when other cops make requests sound like orders. I'd give him an A.
So officer Davis lost qualified immunity and the suit was dropped after a settlement was reached. So.... he had to pay out of pocket for this. That's nice
It is not out of Mr. Davis's pocket. Losing qualified immunity means that the case can go forward. Winning the civil case means that whoever indemnifies Mr. Davis pays the penalty (like an insurance company, the city, the police department, all of which actually means the taxpayers pay). There are some exceptions to this such as if Mr. Davis were criminally liable as well as civilly liable.
And we all lived happily ever after.. jokes aside, if more of them actually had to pay out of pocket for their crimes against us then perhaps there would actually exist "the good cops"
@@jackcommonman1381 Trump wants to give cops FULL immunity.
@@Some_Guy_6 Never believe what the media says.
Trump will only back whomever he feels will benefit his pockets
Bro looked straight coked out af. Holy crap.
Drinking and driving is legal in Mississippi, just not driving while intoxicated. No open container law in Mississippi.
Several southern states were that way years ago.
Hey fellow Mississippian! 👋🏽… yeah our daiquiri shops next door Louisiana… you know we break that law 😂
It’s a crime in sensible places because we know the drink might be spilled.
When I moved to NC open containers were legal and all of the passengers could be drinking, but the driver had better blow a 0.
Thanks
The cop who stopped him never witnessed the driver cross over the line himself. It's obvious.
Those cops in the first video sound more inebriated than the driver does..
I was thinking the same.
Exactly! I could barely understand what they were saying…..garbled words!!
@@joycemarie9702its just the accent. Pretty rude to say everyone who talks like that sounds intoxicated
I couldn't agree more
I agree!
*NEVER tell them what you have on camera.* Let them make their official statement, and preferably _testify_ to that behavior before you confront their perjury.
It's much better when they must fabricate a narrative from their own imagination rather than frame the lie with as much supporting evidence as they can gather.
Cannon what a cool name for a cop!!! He deserves an A because he definitely showed compassion and humility which has been lacking in most publized encounters
"You asked me to bring the thing, i brought the thing. Just remember you can't force him to submit to the test"
"Fuck that I'm out"
The first cop is not used to considering the actual RIGHTS of people.
Cannon was wrong. Of course he can! A citizen called it in because he was all over the road and he admitted to driving. He can't force him, but he can arrest him and draw blood to test.
Yeah, that first cop was angry because he wanted to bust this man,,, and the new officer showed that he was an actual follower of laws. So the first cop was not gonna be able to manufacture a reason in the presence of the new guy.
@@erich6860 As soon as he arrived "Hey your cam is upsidedown" instantly showing thats hes better than 99% of cops we see not holding each other accountable
And that ex-cop is now suing for racial discrimination.
If the person that stopped him leaves the scene and is the only witness to the reasonable suspicion of him driving under the influence then its over with.
That was driving while black. I’m sure the officer knew that stop was racially motivated.
As a white 58 year old conservative, I absolutely agree.
Yeah I’m the last person to say this but race was a factor in that one.
This is how you start a Monday morning :) Thank you for the consistent uploads!
Yeah it was a crime scene. The cop committed the crime.
Respect for officer cannon!
The supervisor should get an F
Because he should be the most knowledgeable of the 3 cops
He said he couldn’t force the driver to submit to a breathalyzer and told the supervisor that it was unlawful to tell the driver he couldn’t operate the vehicle. That’s why he got fired? Insane
No. He got fired for not playing ball.
C+ for a police officer that did his job properly... Audit the Audit definitely drops his pants every time he sees his daddies on the road... Great job 👍👏
He kept his body cam muted because he doesn't know how to interact with the public, he would be fired if any of his body cam went viral
Is the traffic stop not over when the officer that pulled him over left??????
Great to see officers supporting citizens' rights. Much respect to the partner for diffusing a tense situation!
To the cop whom drove off pissed because another officer stated the law is childish and has no business having a badge!
First story is a perfect example of what they do to "Good cops" they get rid of them
Driver admitted to drinking and driving and refused an Alka sensor. Putting other drivers at risk isn't good policing.
@@faytleingod1851
1) Having a drink and then driving isn't against the law; a single drink is not enough for almost any adult male to be even close to impaired enough to where driving would be unsafe
2) You are absolutely within your rights to refuse a breathalyzer test, and that refusal to do so is NOT evidence in and of itself of incriminating behavior. "He didn't want to answer whether he robbed that bank, so he must've robbed it!" is almost exactly what you're suggesting
@@boonsaplenty3924 your right about one thing, it's not illegal to drink and drive within the legal limit. If we used your way of thinking then you could never arrest anyone for drink driving 😂 if everyone who drank and swerved all over the road refused a breathalyzer and said "welp I guess your free to go." If you refuse a breath test typically they take you in for a blood draw if they have probably cause.... Which they did. I should also point out if you refuse a breath test even if the blood test shows legal limit, you still get your license suspended in most states.
The bank robbery metaphor is a weak argument. a bank gets robbed, suspect confirms they were at the bank but didn't rob it. Witness account says that's the guy. Gun matches video surveillance.(Even though let's say it's legal to open carry) "Well guys he said he didn't do it let him go" according to you.
Your completely missing the probably cause in both instances. Without probably cause, let's say they pulled him over for a light being out and he says he had one beer. Then yes they can't bring him in for refusing to test, as there was no reason to believe he was intoxicated.
In Ontario (and I believe across Canada too) it is illegal to refuse a roadside breathalyzer test and officers are allowed to request a breath sample absent probable cause.
In the second video, the cop is simply beyond evil, I have never seen such a cop before. He is pure evil and how he communicated with the detainee and refused to help him
If you haven’t seen such evil before, I suggest you dig deeper into this community. This is very tame in the grand scheme of things.
@@sousadev07 I watch a lot of these videos
@@alexursus4719there’s hundreds of recorded incidents that are magnitudes worse than this.
U never seen this? Lmao this is light compared tho the usual
@@alexursus4719no you definitely not watching a lot of these videos otherwise you wouldn't be surprised. Respectfully.
not one of these idiots can maintain eye contact with each other. literal children with power. wild
It’s not .08 grams, it’s .08% blood alcohol concentration
I would never respect a cop who called me "bruh."
I love it. Look how emotionally stunted and immature those cops are. They can't even handle a mild discussion if everyone doesn't tow the same line. They're babies!
The cop that punched out of that first stop was a punk
Good Job Officer Cannon it’s a relief to see officers standing by the constitution.
That 2nd cop sounded like he was spun out tweeking. If that's how normally speaks and acts he still shouldn't be a cop it's an escalation waiting to happen. His energy is dangerous for his job. He is going to get someone hurt or dead.
Totally agree! Wtf with his idiot mouth and actions
I love this channel! The commentator has such a smooth, melodious sounding voice!!!! And the breakdown of police actions is awesome ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊
Never Answer Questions Asked By A Cop. NEVER. Say that you want a Lawyer Present for any Questions. You have the RIGHT to remain SILENT.
The 5th Amendment is absolutely NOT a " Privilege " but an ABSOLUTE RIGHT. PRIVILEGE can be taken away
Breathalyzer test doesn't apply.
@@GSP-76 he's talking only about the amendment bruh
Technically rights can be taken away too, it happens all the time
That's not the definition of a right.
You also have a right to own firearms... until you're in prison. You can't own a gun in prison despite the 2nd amendment. It's not even a question.
A lot of your rights are taken away in prison.
@crazyrobots6565 Rights can't be taken without due process. In order to perform a search there can be only two reasons. One a warrant being issued to perform a search after probable cause or suspicion is established. The second would be a pat down for weapons to protect officers who are concerned about personal safety. Understand though to suspend a right constitutionally there must be due process. Only after you have been allowed to face your accusers and allowed to mount a legal defense and face the accusations that necessitates a suspension of your liberty. Don't forget that there must be a process followed and there must be a lawful and legitimate reason for the suspension. Whether it be temporary or permament.
The police chief should be charged for all of his officers actions
Why didn’t any officer ask the driver WHEN he had that 1 beer?
Because they don't want conflicting evidence. That is why people should never answer questions 🙄
Bc they wanted to arrest him and tow the truck
@@bchap1233 ::: None of them ever mentioned the smell of alcohol. Blood shot eyes, slurred speech, inability to find papers etc.
Because if it really was one beer then it should not put the average person over the average legal limit..
I wasn't surprised that officer Cannon was fired. He didn't tow the blue line.
2:58 “Your body camera is upside down.” AMAZING catch and call out very important
I’m a couple minutes in to the second case and I SWEAR I wanna scream, I HATE police who act like this. He should be fired and charged with assault
Losing your job because you decided not to ruin someone’s life . I hate cops and this cop should sue for being wrongly fired
How can cop keeps getting jobs, but if a regular citizen gets a dui, it literally messes up their career? I don’t understand that.
On the first one you keep coming back to "the driver's exhibited driving behavior" for how you judge the second officer. Neither that second officer nor the supervisor witnessed the driving behavior. The only officer who did see it already said he wasn't pursuing a DUI because he didn't like that they had him working nights and then left. So where would the cops that didn't witness his driving be getting the probable cause to compel a breath test?
Yeah exactly my takeaway too. The only person I'm giving a C or below to is ATA themselves. It's just lazy work to take the word of something not present in the footage. If you are gonna properly weigh on these situations then what the cops claim to be true shouldn't matter.
To say Officer Cannon was in the wrong to not escalate the situation is literally advocating for police to use excessive force as long as they get permission from a supervisor.
@@kyo1546thank you! I knew I felt funny listening to ATA’s description of the driver. It almost felt like he was profiling the guy tbh. But the only one who saw him must’ve not thought it was that bad if he just drove away.
@thesuperdingos Yeah he never questions the first officer claiming the guy was swerving even tho there is literally no evidence of this. He can't even note where the guy swerved or any specific details and there is NO dashcam footage, why?
Just the driver admitting to drinking and driving is all the probable cause they needed.
@seeya205 Nope, the video addresses this directly it's willful ignorance to claim this.
The law states there must be proof of lack of control NOT proof that they've had a drink. The guy was coherent, he was able to stand just fine, he knew where he was, where he was going, what he was doing, and why. There was no indication he was under the influence whatsoever.
It's extra jarring compared to the second clip where AtA points out how the footage is manipulated to make the officer look better due to the officer muting it as convenient for himself, and him not recording the original altercation. Somehow this isn't extended to the first case where the same conditions are present.
This isn't even about the conduct of the cops specifically at this point. If AtA wants to be a trusted source for these things the channel has to remain impartial to what the viewers can see so we are all on the same page. This first clip doesn't clear that bar at all.
100% respect to that cop, to not wanted to violated the man right. 👍. Good cop.
I wonder if he still done that if he wasn't a brotha?
@@Trip_Ts
Definitely not. It reminds me of the movie birth of a nation.
@@Trip_Tsabsolutely. It sounds like he was super scared because of previous trouble he got in
@@Trip_Ts a brotha? Tell me you're racist without telling me you're racist. Smh
@@Trip_Ts Cheers to racism
Ohhh... "alcohol sensor." I kept thinking he was saying alka seltzer