Resident Evil 3 Remake - All Consoles Tested - Has Xbox One X Improved?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Join John Linneman and special guest Alex Aniel as they take a look at the Resident Evil 3 Remake. How does the RE Engine deliver from a technical perspective? And how does image quality and performance stack up across all platforms - and crucially, has Xbox One X improved from its disappointing demo showing?
Subscribe for more Digital Foundry: bit.ly/DFSubscribe
Join the DF Patreon, support the team more directly and get pristine quality video downloads: www.digitalfou...
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #1 НАЧАЛО ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ [Новый сезон] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/380Q7gLWGvk/mqdefault.jpg)
When are devs going to realize that FPS is more important than resolution? Start at 4K and then drop it until you can hit 60 FPS consistently or use dynamic resolution. No excuse for this.
Some game didn't require high FPS. They just care for visual and how it pleased your eyes
Next gen will change that.
yeh cause console users are known for they high standards.
@@normalasian5042 60 fps would look better than a 4k resolution always
@@craigharris41 but all devs would just go ultra settings with raytracing and force the console to run at 8k, which i guess would wnd up in 24fps or 30fps
Everyone else: “April’s fools hahaha”
Digital Foundry: Quality CRT content
No time to April's fools this year.
Google didn't participate they thought spreading fake news all year long was enough lies
@Drakomus90% is not even remotely accurate. 12hr IT days are in full swing.
@Nathan Miller All Resident Evils are short games...
@Nathan Miller Maybe not Revalation 2. But RE4 and RE6 Are in fact short games. Unless it takes you forever to figure out the puzzles...
Xbox One X needed that dynamic resolutions scaling. Or at least give an option to lower resolution close to PS4pro to keep a stable 60fps.
Lol itll probably eventually get added you know after everyone has already played it and moved on to the next big game.
You can't choose the resolution output of the system itself, on the One X?
oOVanHalenOo no, it’ll always output at the highest
@@CroneRaven1810 You actually can, but it won't change the native rendering resolution of the games.
BestInTheWorld , Exactly. That’s my problem with most patches. They often come out after people are done and have moved on to other games.
Downgrading the gore was a really bad decision
Is a sane move.
I never judged a games quality on this.
Mods will fix that
Could that be because of the major increase in the number of zombies on screen at once?
One of several issues with this title. Too much cut content, reflection issues, and a very short campaign
They cut content to make the absurdly quick release date. Well done, now the remake of 3 will forever be flawed.
Mercenaries is badly missed. Stalker Nemmy is also a weird omission.
The biggest complaint from me is the reduced gore, no limb dismemberment, and the removal of ragdoll physics for dead zombies. Unbelievable. WHY would they remove one of the most innovative parts of their new engine and what was a SELLING POINT for the RE2remake? My hype is very killed now. RE2remake was AMAZING. Why take away from what was already a fuckin masterpiece formula?? Ugh
@@DeadPhoenix86DP exactly. Makes no sense. Plus, the main thing that I and a majority of RE fans care about is awesome single player. I could personally give a fuck less about Resistance in a gaming world that's already oversaturated with goddamn multiplayer.
Mercenaries better come back in a free patch, like the Survivor Stories last year for RE2
EXACTLY. In a few years, the magpies that this was done for will have moved on, and the true fans will forever begrudge Capcom that they FINALLY made RE3 remake and rushed it out just in time for every video game retailer in the world to be closed due to a global pandemic. Truly remarkably bad planning and conceptualization here.
They absolutely RUINED the atmosphere of the original RE3: Nemesis. Removing the clock tower? SMFH, the clock tower had some much lore, was one of the more terrifying portions to play through, and had the most difficult Nemesis encounters. There were Umbrella Mercenaries dead all over the place that told their own stories of struggling to survive, the music and ambience was creepy, and that scene where you find the dead Merc embracing the civilian female and reading his journal, how the hell did they cut that out in the remake!?!? The dead factory was all kinds of fucked up. They used to capture trespassers and torture them for experimenting and discard their bodies. All of that good shit is GONE in the remake.
I honestly wish we got remakes of 2/3 after the masterpiece that was REmake, that still is the best remake ever made IMO.
They did WHAT? WHY?
I preordered and payed for it on Steam. Im a huge fan and still gonna play it anyway. But why the fuck did they remove the clocktower? That doesnt make any sense. Huge plotpoints happen there. WTF!?
@@Cenkolino They fucken ruined the game. No relentless pursuing Nemesis, no campy and ominous soundtrack. The one thing that nobody fucking talks about with the original RE:3 was how deep and fucked up the little details and lore was. The story of the Mercenary team at the clock tower that had to kill and pillage survivors and other people only to turn on each other, the dead Merc holding the civilian girl, the Merc that committed suicide in the alley way, the police station stand off with David Ford and the cops feeling guilty for abandoning fellow cops to die after being saved by them. The girl that gets brutally killed by a zombie at the entry way where Dario locks himself up, and the new corpses that appear outside the bar when you meet Brad in the original after nightfall, it's all fucken gone. In RE3:Nemesis, the background, journals, and umbrella mercenary corpses told so much story and had so much potential to be expanded on, especially the ending at the dead factory wear you come up to the aftermath of US military special operations all littered dead near the Tyrant corpse.
They absolutely FUCKED this game up!
@@J64866 Seriously. The GameCube remake of RE1 expanded on all the things that made the original great, modified a few things but kept the true nature of all the horror aspects in tact and the undertones of it still painted a lot of mystery and dread in your mind. It left you thinking about how things went down for the scientists, and you could imagine the Stark reality of it all which added to the survival horror element.
RE3 remake took Tyrell Patrick and fleshed him out, which was stupid as hell, considering his original character served as a supervisor who got turned on by Nikolai at the hospital, where as they had the entire Clock Tower incident that unfolded before Jill arrived at the clock tower and they could have dived into those events full force but totally fucked it out.
Sergeant Grimm you realize Nemesis was scripted in the original right? Yes he could pursue you through rooms but he’s only encountered when you reach certain areas.
I noticed a lot of people misremembering how Nemesis behaved in the original Resident Evil 3. Nemesis was always scripted. He always appeared in the same locations depending on which actions you took (if your went the the restaurant first, he appear there/ if you went to the press building first, he appeared there instead). Nemesis wasn't this persistent stalking presence. The only thing that separated him from other enemies was he could chase you between rooms. You always knew when and where he was going to show up. Lastly, If you got the Magnum early in the STARS room (luck based), Nemesis was a pushover for almost all of his future appearances.
Sure but he was
1) Present in a lot more locations (partly because so many were cut for this "remake")
2) A more persistent hunter that would patrol the areas he'd spawn in (because there was a reason to traverse those old areas in the original.)
Let's not pretend that just because he was scripted to spawn in areas in both games they use him in the same way, because they don't.
No one is misremembering the original. We're comparing it to the much better Mr. X from the last game, that itself based on what Nemesis could have looked like, and so now they turn Nemesis back into a series of scripted cutscenes and boss fights? I think you're trying to fight fault with criticism that is perfectly valid.
@@IHeart16Bit Maybe its because I always downed him but he never patrolled areas in any of the 9+ play throughs I did on PS1/Dreamcast.
@Home Depot Video games should evolve. I'm stating that the feature was never really there in the original. Alot of reviews are misrepresenting how he behaved in the original game.
@Home Depot I'm only referring to initial appearances. If you defeated in him the Press Office, he would not reappear until his next scheduled appearance (I believe by the burning alleyway)
I respect that some people would like to see more games with open world environments but I am actually very glad that remakes of RE2 and RE3 are so linear. I am sick of open world games. Its just too much.
It isnt about the open world though, its about the game length, when you open up the game to moving around the town, it stands to reason you expect larger areas, but strangely RE2 remake felt alot bigger and longer than Re3 which feels very short.
Open worlds are great for RPGs
Re2 remake id not linear at all
It's not too much. That's just on you. I love both.
They don't wanted the game to be Open World, they are talking about Open areas, like it happens on Evil Within 1 & 2. The Raccoon City looks like a lot of corridors them a open City itself.
They also talk about RE2 be more open them RE3, so you can imagine how constrained is the RE3 Remake.
Locking games to native 4K will likely result in compromises even in next gen. Dynamic resolution with fixed framerate should be a better option.
Shyh Horng not really in the next gen. the big bottle neck for fps this gen are the CPUs. They are not just slow and outdated but have to spare upto 5 cores for I/O decompression and audio. But next gen consoles have a custom unit for io and audio and complete 8c multi threaded zen 2 CPUs for maintaining 60 fps while GPU works to achieve native res
@@xplaguegaming2976 Ikr. If you think about it, this will be the first console generation that isn't bottlenecked by some component on the console. The 7th gen was bottlenecked by RAM and relatively weak GPUs, 8th Gen had horrible mobile CPUs, this next gen, however, they're coming pretty well prepared.
Seeing how the Xbox One X can play SOME games in native 4K, I don't see how it's going to be a problem next gen. Series X is more powerful than my 1080 Ti. That's crazy, honestly, especially considering most PC gamers are on a 1060.
@@Tomiply You are forgetting that it's NEXT-GEN and there should be a big jump in graphics quality. If the graphics WILL stay the same (and I think it will like a lot of years now) than yes, "next-gen" consoles will not have trouble at outputting native 4K at stable framerates. All-in-all I think "next-gen" is a marketing bullcrap now, it will be just yet another hardware upgrade.
@@guitarboy0211 some devs have started to complain about the series s
When will developers accept the fact that framerate is way more important than resolution...?
I can live with an adaptive resolution, but I really can't stand inconsistent framerates.
Meteor Media agree. That’s exactly what turned me off to the PS4 version. Got the game on PC just for the frame rate performance. Most people would take 60FPS @1080p all day compared to 4K 30. Devs need to understand that and stop being so stubborn.
Adaptive resolution is amazing, it should be in every game engine and at least a toggle option in every game these days.
@@thebluethunderbunny2324 They should aim for 2K 100 fps
@Moogle Midgar you sir just proved that you are a dumbass, Phil spencer/Xbox have not ever mandate that games run at 4k on the one x. It's up to developers.
@@FireMrshlBill honestly next gen should only have 2 modes for every game. A 60fps mode with dynamic resolution (1800-2160p) and a 120fps mode with dynamic resolution (1080p - 2160p)
The female model they used for the main character is insanely beautiful.
Nah shes mediocre..
Virgin detected
@@ajsingh4545 I have 3 kids.
I just slipped on a schlumped chicken and busted my codger. 🤟🏻
Got that Abella Danger vibe going on.
Probably better to just get this game in 6 months when it drops to $20 and has most of the performance patches installed.
Get a PC, play games day one with beautiful graphics and awesome performance, you bum. :)
@@TheMusic4Soul yea just got my gaming pc ryzen 2700x paired with msi 2070 super gaming x games look amazing on it
Or you could get it on PC where the performance is excellent and somehow less demanding on VRAM than RE2make.
@@secoTheSonicFan that salt, these tears, beautiful
Got it for $40 pre order sale. But will drop to $20 in about year and a half. Games drop fast nowadays
I’m definitely going to wait for a pricedrop on this one.
Smart man
For any current Xbox console, yes. I got it on PC.
Day one pick up for me.
Not pertinent to the topic mate
@Neoand12 still 60$ in my country.
Not only they butchered the came content, but they also screwed the performance... Good job Capcom...
They were doing so well, well I guess the term Crapcom will come back
Again....
Plus they took away gore, limb dismemberment and ragdoll physics on top of everything else. Unfuckingbelievable. A year of excitement down the drain for me. I'll now just wait on a big sale. I also dont want to feel like half of my purchase money is going towards fucking Resistance (don't call it "free" ... let's be real...we're paying for that multiplayer shit, whether you want it or not). More reason to hold off imo.
This sounds like a game I will definitely wait for a sale.
Indeed, cancelled my preorder. 60 bucks for 5 hours is asking for too much.
@@Ford-wt8rn Yeah and I know it has its resistance multiplayer mode but idc i am a single player guy
@@Ford-wt8rn You should play the game for yourself instead of going off of reviewers who play on assisted difficulty and rush through it :/
Smart
@Solomon Guile it's not a bad multiplayer if you like Dead by Daylight but it still ain't worth $60
Re3 remake was outsourced to 3 different teams, not including the multiplayer which was yet another different team.
So it stands to reason why it seems the remake in this sense is very different to Re2 remake which was done completely in-house, different directors, budget and of course a different design philosophy is my best guess. Its also possibly why nemesis is very different than mr x.
It is a little bit of a shame because it is quite short, even though the development time was around 3 or so years, with many expecting they would be opening up the game a bit more, considering it takes place around the town as opposed to limited within a couple of areas.
Personally this feels much more like a DLC than an outright sequel, a lesser game than even the original RE3 in my eyes, a great game but still a lesser game.
Its also probably why they decided to ship the game with the multiplayer, considering its limited length, they more than likely felt that it needed an extra something to make it seem like a product that would justify the price tag.
Interestingly one of the teams that helped make the re3 remake, namely M-Two, has been granted another classic capcom IP to remake, with many speculating it could be Dino Crisis or Code Veronica.
Source : VGC
M-Two:
Sources indicated that the firm had been in operation for over a year and was comprised of several former Platinum and Capcom employees.
Now Resident Evil 3’s game credits have for the first time named Minami as the executive producer of the title, on behalf of M-Two.
Minami has a long history with Capcom, having started out as a designer on Street Fighter II Turbo and Super Ghouls and Ghosts, before producing games in the Resident Evil, Mega Man and Devil May Cry series.
Minami left Capcom to form ODD Ltd in 2006, which was later merged with SEEDS Inc to form PlatinumGames. Minami was president of PlatinumGames until his resignation in 2016.
M-Two was formed the following year with funding from Capcom, although it’s understood that the company is technically independent.
Resident Evil 3’s staff roll also names a handful of M-Two employees, including designer Tsutomu Teranishi, who worked with Minami on the Mega Man series, and a pair of ex-Platinum programmers.
Another PlatinumGames veteran, Kiyohiko Sakata, was the game director for Resident Evil 3.
Sakata led the 2020 title from his company Red Works. The remake was also co-developed by Capcom subsidiary K2 Inc.
While M-Two’s role was primarily as a support studio for Resident Evil 3, VGC understands it is currently working as the primary developer on a larger remake project for Capcom.
VGC sources previously indicated that Minami had initially planned to approach his former colleague and Resident Evil creator Shinji Mikami to join the startup, thus giving the firm its name ‘M-Two’ (Minami / Mikami).
However, it seems the Resident Evil designer decided to remain at Bethesda-owned Tango Gameworks. Minami and Mikami were previously colleagues at both Capcom and PlatinumGames.
@Nathan Miller But, if you count the great replayability, REsistance and maybe some free DLC mode like a Mercenaries or The Ghost Survivors / The Other Ghost Survivors... definitely worth.
cant wait to play the game high
They put so much care and love into the RE2 Remake, but then outsource RE3, which also has a huge cult following, to separate dev team? What is Capcom thinking?
I hope there is a silver-lining here, ie, the main division is working on a Code Veronica Remake. But unfortunately RE3's time as a Remake has been tarnished by all this cut content.
That is not true. RE3 was made between 3 teams, but 2 of them are in-house teams, only the third one, M-Two is "second party" studio funded by Capcom. So again, no true, it wans't outsourced. In any case these are different teams and not the one which made RE2 Remake.
its obvious they worked on RE2R and RE3R at the same time
sarcasm?
It’s obvious re3 remake was rushed
@@aucamancallisto5291 rushed cause they spent all that time creating Racoon City. the world took more time to develop then REmake2 which was only small parts outside, RPD, Sewers and the Lab.
Absolutely no reason for this to have such an unstable framerate on X1X when the stellar RE2 remake just last year looked outstanding and maintained a almost locked 60 FPS. This needs to be fixed.
It was 1620p now is 2160p
Maybe one if the devs is dyslexic and put 2160p instead of 1620p by mistake.
To be fair this looks better and has more enemies at once on the screen. i think its a clear improvement. But I also have a killer PC (i9 9900k, RTX 2080 Ti, 32GB Ram and NVMEs) so what do I know eh?
@@Cenkolino
Thx for the flex, fam. Very cool.
Then again, I also have a high end 5700XT that runs like a 2080.
There u go, backflex.
@@Cenkolino I've got a 1080 Ti, 8700k 32gb RAM with NVMEs also. Also have an X1X and PS4 Pro. Of all three I like the Xbox the most for the achievement system and obviously my PC for performance. I did a 100% completion of RE2 on X1X and PC
Looks like this is the "direct to DVD" sequel to RE2 Remake.
Just like how the original RE3 was the "direct to VHS" sequel to the original RE2.
@@JohnnyUndaunted Sure, but that does not excuse it in any way.
This is a REMAKE, they should have done better.
@@IHeart16Bit Better how? They JUST reused the same (great) engine and redesign most of the original levels.
RE2make copied more stuff from RE2 from than RE3make from RE3.
@@kicapanmanis1060 they cut too much content from the original RE3, I havent heard anyone mention if it has the mercenary mode. I was looking forward to it cuz of I'm unemployed due to corona beerus. But I'm just gonna stick to netflix.
It does have mercenary mode ause they littlery made a while extra game called re resistence tht comes with re3 and it free
7:00 This is EXACTLY why I came here. Sad they have not changed that SSR implementation. But still, beautiful game.
I felt like this remake is a rushed product. I hope their next project will be more refined.
Rush for xbot..lmaoo
Not for the market leader ps4.
This company doesn't know how to not overkill a financial opportunity. I think the Resistance mode is a good example of that. I wouldn't be totally shocked if things go monetization focused or more RE5/RE6 action shooter heavy stylein the next project
@@srgntsaltynutz5559 It runs at a little higher than 1440p to get that stable 60 fps. Is that what you are referring to ?
Even how it feels to walk around and aim, at least on the pc demo, felt off compared to RE2. Not sure how I can describe it but it felt a lot more stiff. I'm still buying this, no doubt about it, but we'll see how it stacks up.
I think they should have ditched the multiplayer aspect of the game and sold it at $29.99. The game is too short to justify a price of $59.99. Granted Resident Evil 2 can be beaten in 6 hours too, but you had two characters to choose from each with two scenarios so you literally had to beat the game 4 times to get the full experience. The same can't be said for Resident Evil 3 unfortunately. Don't get me wrong I love this new remake but it's not worth the full asking price. Wait for a sale, I guarantee the price will get slashed in half this year.
@Shields Activated according to Capcom Twitter & RE team, they cut back a ton to not delay the game. And more work went into R3sistance, bleh.
I still cannot believe they charged full price.. I totally agree it should have been reduced price. It looks remarkable, but it doesn't feel like a must have.
To be honest I wish they packaged 2&3 together to make it a complete experience.
But 3 looks like it has the same issues as 2R did.
@Shields Activated You play as Carlos for brief moments through Jill's story but he doesn't have his own stand alone scenario. Jill is the main character of the game and isn't like RE2 where you can select between two characters from the beginning.
Robert Turner so they basically rushed it?
@@campersruincod6134 reviews definitely gives those vibes
The RE2 remke was 20 dollars by black friday of the year it released even though it was a huge success. I expect RE3 to be the same. Im a die hard fan so i just had to get it and i dont regret it at all. Ill probably do multiple playthroughs as well just for fun.
Let's all be honest here, CAPCOM f*cked this one. The main characteristic of RE3 was its decision making. This enabled alternative paths, the location of certain objects varied along with the solutions of some riddles and also different encounters with Nemesis. None of that is here.
Nah you're just being a whiney kid. Grow up and accept it or don't buy it. Tired of hearing ungrateful kids when they wouldn't have done this if it wasn't for us.
@@deadrisingplayer I pay for the game, I don't owe nothing to Capcom and I don't have to be grateful.
@@mikel66661 Congrats, 2 children who can't be grateful and can't be happy with anything they buy.
@@deadrisingplayer Anything they buy? They're clearly criticizing the came specifically. It's not like this game is a magnum opus or anything either. It's good, It's just not Silent Hill 2 good. I tend to appreciate the graphical prowess and gameplay mechanics, hence why I bought an Xbox One X, I was also dissapointed by the constant frame-rate dips at max settings, but can I say it ruined my experience of a game with an original-enough story, a clear focus on horror and gunplay, and the return of two of the most beloved characters in gaming history? Hell no, but flaws are flaws, and every single issue with the remake FFX pointed out, I felt the same thing while watching playthroughs, but I just didn't care enough. If the atmosphere and and sense of dread I felt in Raccoon city were as bad as the redesign of the titles namesake though, I'd even reconsider buying the game as a whole.
Anyone else thought this was way more of an impression video than a technical analysis. I like when they give their overall thoughts on other aspects but this was a bit too much.
Microsoft want their money's worth. They don't give digital foundry exclusive insight for free.
Also, why comment console versions only? Not even the alleged next generations will be able to compete with pc, which is always 5 steps ahead. Arguing about teraflops is so silly...oh, and games are waaay cheaper.
I think it was very interesting to listen.
@@doubleohdutch2108 current consoles already compete with PC, the next gens are 4x as powerful than the current gen lol....unless you have a $4,000 or up custom gaming Pc...you're not going to match the power of the series x or ps5s dedicated hardware.
Keep in mind, dedicated hardware consoles require 1/3 the power of a PC to match similar graphics qnd frames. So the 13TFlop next gen consoles are equivalent of a 39Tflop pc lol. And that don't even exist
MixeTube hmmmm next gen consoles is actual mid range gaming pc. Where’s the improvements?
"its a fun action game with some cool setpiece moments"
Not the sentence I want to hear when talking about Resident Evil...
So disappointed with Nemesis in the original game he was much more menacing than original Mr X yet in the remake he's a huge letdown compared to Mr X in the remake of 2.
Because they had Mr.X in the game too much amd made him too much like the original Nemesis.
@@realamericannegro977 yeah in the original you only face mr x in scenario b
@ Yeah I think they were trying too hard in many areas to make it scary in the remake, and this is one of those cases.
Yeah I'll take 60 fps over 4k anyday
Same.
Hell, I'll take 30fps as long as it's stable
240p 60 fps gang where you at?
Absolutely.
I would take 30 fps over inconsistent sub 60 any day
It's funny how Capcom themselves said that re2 and 3 are reimaginings and not remakes but ppl still call them remakes
The only game they actually remade is the first. I want to see that reimagined too.
Maybe its because the games have "Remake" in the title
Enzo Bueno no they don’t. Both cases for each game are missing the word “remake” on the cover.
And people get upset because the games dont turn out like they expected
I call them revisualizing
I really love that in the latest videos you express your opinions about every game. It's really helpful to see a video analysing the tech and the performance of a game, but also get an insight of how good it is.
I think Capcom has been making amazing games lately remake or not
They have kicked ass this generation. Last gen not so much
Yep but cheating us a lil but with the reimaginings.
REmaking
Real American Negro resident 3 was like a 2 hour game if you knew everything already so im not surprised to hear how short this one was
@@capcomfan82 Only fanatics can beat that in 2hours and its not natural. If they didn't include that multiplayer bs the game might have been longer and a lil bit better.
This looks pretty awesome,i cant imagine how good it will be on Series X or Ps5
Realmasterorder looking forward to 4K and locked 60 on both!
This runs at 4k/60fps locked on Series X.
@@SNUL9sn9 As well as the PS5
@@dannyruiz3820 PS5 will probably run the Pro version, therefore it will run at 1620/60.
Like on regular PC, lol
"Wow the city was so dissappointing it's very linear"
Yeah well it's not a damn open world game dude what were you expecting. It's how OG RE3 was This isnt GTA.
I took it to mean that he wanted more options to traverse individual "rooms" of the city, instead of being funneled through debris on one single path, not that he was expecting a wide-open sandbox. More like having various options to navigate to the desired location, instead of treading the exact path the developers intended.
@@Roooobb That wasn't how the original was, and that shoudln't have been what he was expecting. The exact locations are different but for the most part the level design philosophy remains intact. This isn't the Spencer Estate or The RPD, RE3 was always alot more linear. How else would they block you off from locations in a destroyed city besides debris? It's just a silly complaint no matter how it's sliced
Yeah I don't understand that criticism. The OG RE3 was pretty linear as well.
they are disappointed because its 2020 dude , not 1998. The technology they have available its pretty shameful that the city is still a glorified hallway.
They dont want it to be gta , they want some expansion of Racoon city , the most iconic city in the franchise. You only remake a game once every 20 years or more.
@@shaheryarking well that's not what this game is. This isn't an open world game and was never intended to be one I'm glad they didn't butcher the experience trying to "expand" on the city like The Evil Within 2 did. This city is a backdrop for the story that unfolds and that's all it NEEDS to be. This is Resident Evil, not Fallout.,
This is the first DF video I disliked. I think you should make 2 videos, one with your impressions of the game and another with the technical analysis and performance. I just wanted to see if the Xbox version performance improved, not to see a guest bashing the game.
With the much briefer development time since RE2R and the inevitable smaller campaign, it is clear to anyone with half a brain that CAPCOM were going for a more focused and highly replayable experience. In that they succeeded magnificently, what with the challenges to have fun with and the unlockables - not to mention the different enemy composition on higher difficulties and more randomness, I think this version is hugely underrated.
Nah...
The Resident Evil is the type of horror video games that I would risk myself to play in the dark, feeling like the zombies are coming to attack me on screen.
This shows that more teraflops mean nothing when SONY has the market share.
Developers will always choose to optimize for PlayStation most of the time.
DUKIE LOVE well said, it has been the same story since I remember, regardless of hardware more popular console is always the target for developers.
Depends really. Japanese developers yes. Western devs No
Ottmar Schobel yeah, Call of Duty Modern Warfare was developed by Japanese developers, how about Doom Eternal, I think it’s from a Japanese developer that performs better on PS4 Pro!
It's not popularity, you make the game for the lowest common denominator Firs then beef it if up where you can for the higher power machine.
PS4 Pro : 1620p
Xbox One X : 2160p.
That’s why
Japanese devs have been doing this kind of thing all gen. They simply dont optimize for Microsoft's machine. A bit puzzling as the power is there.
Oh well, great video as always John!
And it doesn't mean this game is less optimized for X1X. The resolution is much higher and shadows are better too.
It depends on what devs prioritize. Resolution or framerate. I do agree that framerate is subpar. That goes for base ps4 and xbox one too.
The x just can't handle the 4k resolution.. nothing to do with optimization. I mean it's even trying to do 4k with checkerboarding. The results are the best you can hope with the given hardware.
@@ryuaga True true. But it is a very common thing ive noticed is that japanese devs dont use custom settings to hit the 60fps target. Sekiro, MHW and now this. They just stick to whatever settings then theyre done. Like if they knew X1X couldnt hit the 60fps, why not lower the resolution? It just strikes me as puzzling
I dont even play on consoles much anymore, I just find it interesting the approach that these devs use.
@@ambro2786 Have you ever tried dark souls prepare to die edition on pc? That game is a case of the devs not caring about a platform. Re3 doesn't even compare to that blunder.
@@ryuaga I havent but Ive heard the horror stories. Its kinda unbelieveable really lol
I finished the game (in about 11 hours, including a lot of exploration, backtracking, and dying), and I have to say that it is an excellent game! However, there is so much more that they could have done. If you want a game that is better than 90+% of all other games on the market, then buy this. If you need a true RE3:Nemesis experience, parts with a constant stalker, ample character development and drama, and interesting puzzles, then you will likely be disappointed. But you'll be disappointed regarding what this game could have been, not what this game is if not compared to its predecessors.
They still can play original and smell the streets. Such a good old game.
Not worth the 60 dollars. A good rental for sure.
@MrWereverforeverI usually rent them from gamefly. I've played many new games that way for a fraction of the cost.
@@GM-Shenmue Your pic reminded me I should play shenmue one of these days. Thanks for that.
Omega Red lol found the fanboy. Real mature kid.
11:00 since when did this Technical Analysis turn into a review
Since he got such an opinionated second host on with him instead of someone who stays fairly impartial like Alex Battaglia or Richard Leadbetter.
I can't stand when he brings on guest that aren't part of the normal DF host team they always feel so unprofessional and derail what could have been a very straightforward tech analysis.
Now that capcom has patched it for Xbox 1X would love to see this revisited.
Why didn't Capcom lock it at 30 on the base consoles? Hmm
Why would they? That makes no sense
@@diretoaospontos-victorbarb7377 Because the game would run smoother.
@@diretoaospontos-victorbarb7377 Studders like crazy... it needs a cap.
Honestly this greatly worries me for Cyberpunk 2077. I just hope they release it on ps5 and xbsx
Steve Rosebud it’s already been confirmed that they are also coming on the series x and ps5
I'm so glad John mentioned the weird refresh rate on animations from a distance. During the demo, you can see zombies that are quite far away and they're practically flip book animations. I understand this limitation on consoles but on PC with a beefy graphics card, it should be an issue. The distance is also really bad. You only have to get a few feet away from an enemy and you'll notice them drop to half rate.
Christopher Simon what’s your point?
@Christopher Simon When I said limitation on consoles, you do realise I meant this current crop of consoles right? Like, they're pretty weak in comparison to a top tier PC. But you don't even make a point to my point, just that the PS5 will be powerful, which yea, it will be. Also, my PC has a GTX 1080 Ti, that's well beyond the power of a PS4 Pro so shut your mouth. But to reiterate my point, regardless of how powerful something is, the framerate animation in this game is trash, whether it's on the Xbox One S or on the much more powerful X, they both exhibit the same issue.
mrcraggle this was present in remake 2, but seems way worse and more common in this game.
Lol who cares. As if you stop and check out every animation while playing the game. I want to have fun not staring at far away Zombie animations. Its not a flaw its a nitpick at best.
VirusRonsen82 the first time it’s super noticeable is right away when you meet brad. Before you activate the cutscene, the zombies (well lit by the barricade and impossible to miss visually) are all moving with slideshow animations.
You literally don’t even know what you’re talking about while trying to shit on other people.
Nemesis wasn't even slightly surprising in the original RE3... He popped up in the exact same spots every play through.
RE Engine looks like an amazing piece of tech. compared to what's out there currently.
Quake engine 7 is a masterpiece too
It does suit this type of game style, heck they could remake any survival horror or pre rendered 3rd person title that was on ps1 and it would be amazing.
Id love for them just to churn out all their titles in this format and I would be entirely happy about it.
Code Veronica, Dino Crisis, RE: Origins, RE: Revelations, RE4, RE5, Onimusha... the list just goes on and on
Apparently it's not up to par these days since they had to downgrade the gore effects from Resident Evil 2.
@@Executi0ner246 I'm one of the people that is extremely disappointed with this factor. This alone broke my year long hype and I'll probably now wait for a sale. It feels like a slap in the face that Capcom would remove one of the most innovative parts of the new engine and what was a SELLING point for RE2remake.
Chris Bullock id tech 7 is pretty damn impressive too.
Played this demo.....it's pretty cool. Waiting for Code: Veronica remake 💯
Dino Crisis
I have bad news for you. There is another remake in development as of today. However, it is NOT Code Veronica. That won't be happening.
@@GamingInstincts apparently people are not going to be happy about the next project.
Gaming Instincts TV ........hmm, let me reword "waiting". I would wish they'd do a CV remake. Whether that happens or not, it's outta my control 💯
@@nicolasfalcon2568 as far as I know the next Resident Evil game release is in 2021 and it's a MASSIVE departure from what the series is known for.
Believe it takes place somewhere in europe in a forest and a medieval castle.
Buy the game and don’t download the patch
Alex trying so hard not to flat out say he thought it sucked haha. I guess a bit of a missed opportunity but on its own terms seems to be okay.
I sensed the frustration from both the guys, you can tell they felt the direction was different to what they were expecting.
It sucked, a lot. It was so disappointing, this game. Way too short, too much was cut, what is there feels rushed. It's bad.
Capcom has released a patch that has apparently fixed the majority of the performance issues on Xbox One X... The game is playing pretty phenomenally now. You guys should definitely do an update to inform players of the improvements. Thanks.
They dropped the resolution unfortunately
@@marcusmoore2942 Yeah... it doesn't look like they dropped it by much though. I compared some of my screenshots from the demo and the patched retail game and it seems that it may be running at about 1800p now. Either that or they are using temporal reconstruction like the PS4 Pro version to attain a resolution close to 2160p. It is a little bit softer looking.
I really wish they would have given us two different settings that favor either resolution or framerate. I'm thinking one for native 4k 30fps and one for 1620p-1800p 60fps.
Why is more than half of what is supposed to be a technical analysis a design discussion instead? John, you've always shown an inclination to shove your opinions of the game into DF videos, but you've usually been able to keep it brief and tolerable. This here is crossing the line. There are a hundred channels where people can get general thoughts on the game; they are not needed in one of the 2 places that provide sensible technical information.
Because RE2 is so similar tech wise and had a breakdown. Imo this video was quite refreshing.
@@marvinheigel6937 RE2's tech analysis was actually a spoiler video the whole way through. Be glad it's not the case here lmao.
Couldn't agree more!
Especially with some special guest whose opinion about the game I do not want to hear, especially not this long.
I really like this video. Im glad John also shares his opinions about some parts of the game. It's not only refreshing but also helps the technical analysis sound less robotic.
@@r.o.6180 It's OK to share his thoughts briefly throughout the tech analysis, what he has been doing since he came to work for DF, but this time he went too far and video lost any semblance of what it's supposed to be.
In my opinion the base consoles should be capped at 30 fps while the Xbox One X resolution should be decreased to PS4 Pro level. There's absolutely no use forcing 4K when the CPU can't handle it in a title. I hope Capcom patches this.
There's no reason to spoil so many creatures in a tech-review.
pale heads and lickers from RE2 return. Now you know everything lmao.
Based on the length of the game, there's not much to spoil.
He got a ton of flak for spoiling the RE2 remake as well. I thought this would be different but he can't seem to help himself.
Hello Digital Foundry can you test the update 1.05 for xbox x at 4k. It should improve the performance rapidly. Thank you for your great videos and greetings from germany.
Just give us 1620p performance mode for xbox one x!
Lol 1080p maybe
Its not worth it. Xbox X is a niche console.
@@MorrisseyMuse 1620p is the same as re2 and that was stable 60 on X so...
CEWIIH you do realize Xbox one x is more powerful than the PS4 pro
900p maybe
This being DF I would've liked it better if the guest actually talked about the tech and performance, John was focusing on that whereas the other guy was just ranting about RE3 not being the game he wanted. Fair enough but that's stuff for other gaming channels.
I am so buying this game. I am really tired of overly spacious open world never ending empty world go fetch games. Keep the reimaginings coming if they look this good...
Have fun for 4hrs 👍
Greyhollow you do realize you can beat most resident evil games in a couple 2 to 3 hours 🤷♂️
@@ulmeulme No one buys resident evil to play it once and call it a day. Resident Evil games are known for their replayability. Can't wait to play it at least 10 times to unlock stuff and get a S rank time record, that's what defines good RE games.
WarnerAnime 020 Actually...a hardworking spoiled Pig that works while others spend their time obviating the disadvantages of inbreeding.
Damn you can feel the disappointment hard from Alex...and thats exactly how i feel about the game to( have already seen a leaked playthrough) I think its time to replay the OG RE3.
Ffs capcom fix your xbox ports! This and monster hunter world run worse on the xbox one x even though it's a overall more powerful system than the pro
Jack Purchase I noticed a disturbing trend when it comes to Japanese developers. Ace Combat, Sekiro, and now RE3 along with others seem gimped and for no real reason. The C has a faster processor, more RAM, and a much beefier GPU. No excuse.
@@shootermcgavin1208 Yup, because xbox hardly sells at all in Asia. MH world was basically made for the mainstream western world though so they should have put some effort in.
Jack Purchase FFS Xbox gamers buy Japanese games
Easy... simple .. games sell more on ps4. on ps4 it has development priority. Simple Port for xbox one.
It's annoying, they need to switch to Unreal Engine for their games and not their in-house Engine "RE-Engine". I also hope the next Monter Hunter doesn't use the CryEngine, jfc the PC port was horrible, not 100% playable the first 12 months, fucked up your CPU.
Anxiously waiting for the RE4 Remake announcement 🤯
Code Veronica was the first video game where I didn't notice the transition from cut scene to gameplay running on the Dreamcast
Sacrificing performance for resolution on the X. I'd be surprised if it weren't so unsurprising. This happens way too often.
It actually doesn't. Those games are few and far apart.
@@vandammage1747 it actually does. The world's most powerful console should never have worse performance. Modern warfare runs better on ps4, as does this game. Why? Because resolution over performance. Even a first party platformer like will o the wisps can't maintain 60fps on launch.
Play ps4 for high FPS play Xbox for low FPS high resolution
@@shreder75 it's up to developers, look at doom eternal for instance, it runs at 60fps on the xbox one x and runs at a higher resolution and higher pixel count than the ps4 pro, it's up to the developers to take advantage of the extra power or not, and capcom is known for being lazy in that aspect.
@@shreder75 you're lying. Modern warfare runs better on X1X than ps4. It does run better on Pro however at much lower resolution, no freesync and no dolby atmos.
You don't think Modern warfare is optimized for base ps4?
RE2 was my favourite game of last year for a number of reasons but a big one was the level design. Unlocking the RPD room by room was really fun and I’d hoped RE3 would take this further with its City setting. Going to give it a miss.
can you recommend any other game that does something similar to what re2 did in terms of problem solving and puzzles like you explained. I just finished re2 and loved it. I just started re3 and can immediately see that it won't be like the prior game... a little disappointed
@@johncole4882 Control has a cool map that’s fun to explore. Shadow Complex is great and very close to what you’re looking for, just from a 2D perspective. The old Zelda games have cool puzzle dungeons to unravel. The Room on iOS is quite good too!
Xbox one x now running 60fps after patch. Such a smooth and good looking game now
Yea I came back to check it out lol I'm soo happy
Is the resolution still the same or did they compromise on it?
I don't get it, how are you guys showing content already that's not in the demo? Like playing with Carlos? You have access to some sort of pre-release version? I turned the video off because of spoilers due to this.
A lot of people have already played and finished this game. It's one of the perks of having a successful youtube channel
Reviewers get early access to damn near every game in existence. Have you been living under a rock for the last 30 years?
Spoilers to a remake of a 20 year old game..
@@justinthejerkoff Not under a rock, but in a brick building
I feel like you talked more about gameplay design, map design and so on than actual graphics in this one.
Because it's basically identical to RE2 remake.
Bad choice of guest maybe, John focused on tech, the other guy didn't
Mr. X outclassed Nemesis in the remakes! Who woulda thunk it? Smh
Not really
The Capcom bosses screwed it up again....Just when they were gaining back the goodwill from fans with RE7 & RE2R.
Well at least is nemesis trying to smile while killing you
I just realized I want some gonzola. 🤟🏻
I'll wait until next gen and hope both consoles get a 4K/60 update in RE3 remake
This runs at 4k/60fps locked on Series without any update.
@@SNUL9sn9 That'll most likely be similar PS5.
Salt Maker I don't get Xbox only gamers. They don't like PlayStation exclusives. They are obsessed playing multi platform games 4K and 60fps. Yet they buy Xbox after Xbox to play games they could just play on decent pc that cost a lot less than 3 Xboxs ( xbox one, xbox s, Xbox x) they have wasted money on. The Xbox cult is real.
@@toecutter8227 There are many reasons to buy an Xbox over an Playstation. Better online infrastructure, better Services like gamepass, better Controller, multiplayer Games like Halo etc. I'm mainly a PC and Switch and sometimes PS4 player but I wouldnt shame Xbox fans that's just childish
When the original "Resident Evil 3" came out, I was in a time of transition: from a PC gamer to a console aficionado. Yet I remember back then, everyone was at least anticipating "Code Veronica". Not particularly fond of playing "Resident Evil 3".
Back in 1999, "Resident Evil 3" was already an afterthought to the original PlayStation generation. And even 21 years later Capcom may very well be aware of that: as impressive the engine and the visuals are, the set design and the production values are overall quite low and repetitive. It's in many ways a less complex extension of part 2, exaggerated by new "decision" elements. Describing it being more "action" than "horror" doesn't give it justice: at heart, "Resident Evil 3" is no different than "Resident Evil 2". It's just more linear and straight-forward, and "less puzzles" means it's also not as detailed and fleshed-out.
In 2020, everyone should really know when buying "Resident Evil 3", they're also buying "Resistance". Like it or not, but "Resistance" is there for a reason.
very interesting , having not played the original resident evil games back in the day i was very excited about these remakes.
and while re2 remake showed me how amazing this series can be (true to roots survival horror) , re3 remake really was a step down experience , seeming more like re6 in certain aspects with straight up action , set peices , cutscenes , linearity etc
interesting to see how even back in the day it wasnt thought of as much. But there does seem to be some re fans who loved re3 back in the day and really seem to be okay with this remake. Maybe they are just in love with the characters
Feels like a half assed rushed release by a B team of devs who didn't work on the previous game....because that team are too busy working on ResiEvil 8
Cerberus LetsPlay here comes the negativity bandwagon. Have you played the game yet?
Some good news for X owners if you buy it for the Xbox you'll own it on the new Series X and that WILL play it at 4k 60 no doubt.
Soon they will launch a collection with RE2 and 3 for the next generation for half the price... and better resolution/framerate.
After playing it on PC, I'm thinking it just wasn't very well optimized and can be patched.
I was getting drops into the 30's quite often, sometimes even 20's, so something's not right.
I'm running with an RTX 2070 Super, i9-9900k, 32GB DDR4 3200, all loaded to a 1TB M.2 NVME SSD. I even dialed back settings, yet still couldn't hit a stable 60 fps @ 4k.
This is EXACTLY why a lot of people prefer console. We are so busy optimizing the fps of so many other facets in our lives 😊
I played the demo for Xbox one x and I wasn’t impressed and a little shocking at the quality . Frames not stable and the zombies from a distance move at what looks like 10FPS . With all
That power on the x what the fuck are they thinking . Stop trying to push 4K , why not 1080p or 1440p .. 60fps?.
Exactly, 1440p at stable 60fps would have been more than enough
@Christopher Simon It has been patched on the X. It's now 1620p at a more stable frame rate than the Pro.
Why would they opt for the higher res and unstable frames instead of offering the same res as ps4 pro, upscale and run at perfect 60?! I just can't fathom why'd they choose this route. They must have tested it and noticed how unstable it plays. Surely I speak for most xbox x owners that they'd rather have solid 60 and almost the same visual experience as now rather than barely noticable sharper edges and very noticable frame drops.
bcs 1600p seems blurry for xbots xD
I chose the ps4 version for this reason.
on the other side some console gamers dont even know what frame drops are they say lagging must be internet or something lol
Because Sony has the marketing deal, and it has to play best there. Just look at COD MW 2019. (Hence the we will look into fixing it after release, they know the performance is crap, you can feel it when playing)
COD MW doesn’t scale in horizontal and vertical resolutions when the PS4 Pro version does and gives better performance. It only scales on the horizontal axis thus worst performance.
Note: it’s at higher res than the PS4 Pro version but it doesn’t scale down like the pro does to keep the FPS constant, so it plays best on PS4 Pro.
Yeah it's BS that's why I'm getting it on PC, 1080p 100+fps over 4k and 30-60fps anyyday of the week.
and the winner is.....PS4PRO
@Poseidon 1227 whats xboxxx?who cares
It's an honor to listen to the legendary Alex Aniel comment a new Resident Evil game! Two gold stars to Digital Foundry for this video! Kudos to John for another superb tech breakdown ^_^
The worst part is you can't change the rendering resolution on XBOX One X to get 1080p60. Hopefully it gets patched
As someone who owns both an Xbox one x and ps4 pro, I usually prefer my Xbox however I will say I’m tired of Xbox always making one x games 4K just to meet that 4K advertisement, when the frame rate suffers. I can’t tell a difference between 4K and 1440 on my Xbox when I change the output setting however it’s still rendering 4K, just wished they would add a 1080p or 1440p render mode for better more stable frame rate on more games like Star Wars jedi fallen order.
Microsoft is not mandating games to be 4K. This is on Capcom.
kahnsealable ah I see, thank you
@@kahnsealable Microsoft have always hyped the X model to be about "uncompromised 4K" though. Many games released have suffered poor performance as a result of the res emphasis.
@@MorrisseyMuse Microsoft is not making Devs push 4K. It can obviously do 4K but not in every 60fps situation. You keep harping on Microsoft when Sony pushed the Pro as a Dynamic 4K machine and it never hits a DYNAMIC 4K buffer. The Pro always sits around 1440p and even 1080p and 720p. So just stop it. They CB every game to reach anything higher than 1440p. And $400 for 1440p with no 4K Blu Ray, and 40% less powerful than X. Who is really getting over? I have the God of War Pro. I love it. But it's not worth no $400 bucks.
I will wait till the inevitable pack of RE2 and RE3 next year.
Skip to 13:24 for the tech stuff (outside of resolution which is the same as demo)
Why Japanese devs dont care about framerate? They maximized the resolution on Xbox One X but the result is terrible.
If they can't get a solid 60FPS lock at 4K they should at least have the good sense to include a "performance mode" and half the resolution to get a 60FPS lock. 4K is so overrated when we still have to deal with sub-par framerates.
I’m waiting for this to be released in Steam. It’s 2am already where i live but i always have to wait 16-20 hours till Americans finally start wake up and press the release button :)
The premium consoles should have the option to do 4k 30fps and a 60fps mode where they drop the resolution to whatever it takes to get there.
Its all good but
even remakes still suffer from the bullet sponge zombies.. headshot must always behave like a headshot damn it! zombies or not.
They ramped it up for the RE2 remake it takes 3 headshots now.
It zombies went down with one headshot in RE2 it would be a totally different game. You’re supposed to be selective and tactical about what zombies you choose to kill with your limited ammo.
I couldn't disagree more about MR. X. He was just a nuisance and annoyance that felt like it was a choice of wasting my time or my ammo whenever I ran into him. Especially on repeat playthroughs where you'd do your damnedest to avoid his spawn as long as possible and when your avoiding a game mechanic it probably isn't a great game mechanic. I'm aware I'm in a minority on this one.
I'll gladly take a more scripted nemesis. Nemesis being a constant never ending annoyance was my biggest fear when they announced this after RE2R.
Yea I couldn't take Mr X serious, that fedora didn't help either. He's never a threat and is just an annoying puppy you have to lead around and hope he leaves you alone long enough to clear a room of items.
devilmikey00
That's why there's easy mode. If you can't handle unpredictability than go play something else.
@@rjdiggs738 He's not unpredictable, his AI is designed to track you. Unpredictable would be him popping up in random places without you expecting it, game is easy even on hardcore, Mr X is a nuisance.
@@rjdiggs738 Look, idiot, you completely missed his point. He's not saying he couldn't handle unpredictability, he's saying Mr. X was a boring mechanic that was more annoying than actually threatening.
why would you waste ammo on mr.x?
The great thing is you can replay the original and appreciate the vision of the remake.
I just wish capcom would release the classic games alongside the remakes since it's clear they are different games. It would be nice to have the option of playing the new or the old. It gives me a strange feeling when devs and publishers are quick to just throw away the original game like it doesn't exist when they release a remake
@@ianhymers3301 if you really want to play the remake that badly which I can tell you...you dont! It didnt age well it looks extremely horrible on a tv and the controls and animation is bad. I played it on my psvita and it the graphics on the smaller screen was ok... why??? Because I wanted to play the original re2 and re3. If you really want to play an old game dont expect it free and complain. I bought it from the psn store for $4.99usd you should to....."if you really need to play it so bad" or enjoy the remake as I'm sure is better in every way in 2020 just as re2 remake was. For those who think they messed up the remake of re2 ,re3 and final fantasy7 live in the past and replay and enjoy you nostalgia but those original games were great back then but vomit in 2020
@@darkwing5458 Not asking for the game for free. Just want a legitimate way to purchase and play the games on modern systems. I'm on PC and the only option to play the OG is emulation. The remake could be better in every way, I don't know bc I haven't played it, but that's beside the point. Video game preservation is just a disaster nowadays and no publisher are making any efforts. John Carmack releasing the source code for id software games back in the day was huge, now the games will forever be preserved, just wish more companies took this approach
@@ianhymers3301 you are not missing anything those games were great back in the day but by today's standard it's painful to play and look at. Thats why Remakes are so good the original vision is kept intact and its given improvements for a new generation with the latest tech. My point being would I reccomend you play the original shadow of colossus on ps2 or tomb raider on ps1? Hell no the remake on ps4 pro and tomb raider remake on pc with ultrawide support and 60 fps is miles better in every way and character control and controller response is not archaic like the original. I dont see a problem with emulation as getting original hardware to play games does not make sense financially. Why would people want to play ps1,ps2,ps3 games on ps5? I dont have a clue. I game primarily on pc and I can tell you when I play a decade old game if I cant set the resolution to 4k/1440p I'm not interested as my eyes have long grown past 480p. I cant do it. But to each his own. Let the original final fantasy 7 die and be buried as today it's a huge pile of shit compared to the remake. People will disagree but that's my opinion.
@@darkwing5458 I mean you can have your opinion, but more options are never bad for the end consumer
"Resident Evil 3 - I've had a nice time playing it" - John Linneman, 2020
Onimusha remake please!
I’ll be skipping this then unless Capcom fix it on One X. I suppose I could get it for the Pro but I got RE2 on the One X so I’d prefer to stick with that.
If worst comes to worse, and they don't end up patching it, you could always get it when Xbox Series X comes out. The improved hardware should have no trouble locking to game to 60 fps.
Both of these games need a directors cut. In many ways they feel like cheap flashy cash grabs.
Director's Cut...cue the angry synthesized trumpet.
1998...I'll never forget it...
@@barebarekun161 that is hilarious, I actually think the ost was good aside from that.
RE2 Remake a cheap flashy cash grab? What?
@@phrozac *Attempts to cut concurrent story and just make A scenarios, 2nd runs only sloppily hacked together due to fan-outcry*
*Cuts the factory place aka marshalling yard*
*Producer argues with his team for a year to make plant monsters since they want everything to be "realistic" and even when they did they were boring plant zombies*
*Darkside Chronicles re-creates as much environments as remake + all the bosses + all of the enemies despite the RE2 portion in it's entirety only being 1/3rd of that game*
RE2R is a good game truly but these are the facts.
Royal - Even with those edits, it’s still a game with a ton of content and replayability. They cut unnecessary story beats to make the narrative tighter.
This is what happens when you develop the two remakes concurrently with an extremely aggressive release schedule. The resources devoted to developing that multiplayer game that RE3 comes with should have went entirely to single player content. Im guessing the multiplayer will be DOA.
@Christopher Simon thats even worse, it means pre-production was botched, they had settled on a bad plan
You say Nemesis in this remake doesn't have any sens of unpredictability... but really if you played RE3 on the PS1 Nemesis was found always in the same locations and every spot in every game you played... i remember i was equipping the rocket launcher even before entering the rooms... i had photo memory where he was located after completing the game 6 or 7 times
I think what they're saying is that in the Original, sometimes, Nemesis would just showed up and hunt you without a cutscene or anything that show him by pausing the flow of the game. But on this Remake, from what I heard, there always some cutscene "introducing" him, prior to the chase.
@@dfranzner he seems more aggressive too and would go as far as picking you up after he knocks you down.
Yup I beat the game 20 times back then and most of these complaints sound weird to me. I'm even more hyped for the game.
Luke973T I’m starting to think that majority of the complaints are coming from people who never played the originals and their opinions are grounded from the previous remake only.
@ Y'all do anything to give Capcom a pass. That old game had more restraints during development. This had a full 3 years and the originals were put together better. These are hollow in comparison.
There is a workaround for the Xbox one x version if you have a 120hz monitored. Just set your console to 120hz mode and that will mitigate the judder, leading to a much smoother experience.
It's great to see RE live up to it's legacy, by progressively losing track of what it is, with every new entry. When we get to RE 6 remake it's gonna be a table top battle royale probably.
Lmao so true
I have a question for more devoted and informed RE fans. Why didn't they remake RE 1?
SHK Potter they did
Because they already did.
The question is will they re-remake RE1 within the new RE Engine....now that would be interesting.
They have. It's what a remake should be
I play on PS4 pro. So I'm really not the best person to comment on this. But regarding xbox one x, wouldn't 1800p at 60 fps be a better idea? My most played game this generation is GT sport. I think it's checkerboard 1800p. And it's a very good frame rate. But if it wasn't, I'd gladly sacrifice resolution to say 1440p to get 60fps were it not getting it at 1800p. I hope next generation frame rates are devopers priority. 2160p at 60fps is far more appealing to me than trying to go past 4k at the cost of performance. Am I alone in this opinion?
I honestly cannot express how disappointed I am with the lack of Performance/Resolution options on the One X
Incredibly dissapointing, Resident Evil 3 the original is one of my favorite games of all time for the replayability of combining different scenarios together. I still to day play the original RE2 and RE3, I was hoping this remake would enhance the scale and make nemesis a constant threat.
Why did they have to listen to the whiners who couldn’t figure out how to handle Mr. X when I’m sure most people were enthralled by Mr. X?
Part of me thinks that going for full 4K on One X was a deliberate move to showcase how the game will run flawlessly on Series X.
RE Engine scales awesomely. So, targeting a more aggressive range should be doable. 1620-1800p still looks great on my 49-inch. Even 1440p looks great in many games.
“It’s still perfectly playable, it’s just not very consistent”... no wonder John sounded upset throughout the video. I recall him usually bashing the PS4 pro whenever that fluctuates around 50, claiming the games aren’t playable and it’s too noticeable. But, now the X is 30-50 constantly, “it’s perfectly playable”...
Okay.