*BEN SHAPRIO* Leaves Professor SPEECHLESS & EMBARRASSED During Heated Debate!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2023
- 🗳️ Patreon: / alexhefner
📱 Instagram: / therealalexhefner
🙊 Discord: / discord
🎥 Movie Channel: / @alexhefnerstvmovievault
🎮 Gaming Channel: / @alexhefnergaming
✖️ Twitter: / alex_hefner
👕 Merch: crowdmade.com/collections/ale...
BEN SHAPRIO Leaves Professor SPEECHLESS & EMBARRASSED During Heated Debate!
No one in this country should be forced/compelled to do anything they don't want to as long as they didn't impede on someone else's rights.
and it is the right of gay Americans to participate in civil society without having to get permission from some religious nutcase!
Discriminating on the basis of an innate trait (e.g. skin color, sexual orientation) is a form of impeding on someone's rights. If you are operating within a governing body that does not allow (outlaws) such discrimination then you go to jail for committing that crime. It's not a 'freedom of speech' violation to outlaw bigotry.
Now - discrimination based on a persons choices - that's a different matter but lets be sure - sexual orientation is NOT a 'lifestyle choice' any more than being short or tall is a fashion choice.
I don't think that's much of a controversial opinion.
@@grejen711 the "gay cake" controversy is entirely about speech though. The "customer" wanted the artist to create a work of art depicting things that are against the artist's faith and religion. They were entirely welcome to shop at the shop, buy anything off the shelf, but they specifically wanted to force the artist to write things on a cake that the artist was 100% opposed to on religious grounds.
Imagine attempting to commission a Muslim artist to depict Mohammad being eff'ed by the devil with "allah is g4y" written on it, and then the government forcing them to create it. The cake thing is identical.
@@grejen711 Discrimination in any way shape or form does not violate the recipient's rights.
Ben Shapiro talks like when youtube is set on 1.25x speed
If you slow the settings down to .75x Ben Shapiro sounds “normal.”
Ben Shapiro's speech is like when Sonic takes meth instead of rings.
He talks so fast because he believes noone's going to notice everything coming oit of his mouth is pure garbage.
I've dealt with this before. It's what happens when people like to talk over you so you have to get your point across before they do. I don't agree with most of what he says but I get that part.
@@BlackSun6393 It's the exact opposite, it's to cover the weak spots in his arguments and to prevent the other person from breaking his rather weak argument apart bit by bit instead of having to react to the whole word salad.
Too many people today are too obsessed with their party to just sit down and listen to a debate. It's truly sad the lack of civility we have today and how some people are terrified of hearing a different opinion than their own.
Its 5 conservatives talking and agreeing, not much of a debate.
@@HeyLook287 The professor is a clear liberal. Not sure if you even bothered to watch this.
i think weve come to a place where the big differences of parties are too dividing. Like i find myself to be right of center but there are still many democratic policies that im for and several republican things that im not happy with. But politics have become hinged on a small selection of large things, IE abortion, boarder control/immigration, gas/energy productions etc. So for me, there is no room on abortion, im pro life all the way, but i can see where some who are still pro life might say " well girl under age 'blank' should be able to" or "medical condition 'blank' would kill the mother without one", and thats where i believe the state on a micro scale should be able to decide, but i feels a macro broad spectrum abortion is cool style take is terrible and its been used for years as not only a way for people to be held accountable but it also targets groups that are less stable and therefore lowering their population numbers over time.
And i feel similar to the boarder and energy, immigration fine as long as done legally, our current situation is beyond words and biden as only made the cartels lives better. so that being said i feel that those on the other side from where i stand are unable to see things in this manner because they think it should just all go instead of having rules to structure something
@@brendan3081 I've been a moderate most of my life. In today's climate however that makes me a far right extremist apparently. The left has gone too far and refuse to debate or compromise at all and I can't stand that.
@@brendan3081 nobody thinks abortion is cool. Let the mother have the choice, it's fuckin simple lmao.
No business should be forced to sell any particular thing, unless they've agreed to that requirement in exchange for some specific benefit.
I think if you own a business you should be the ultimate determining factor on what is sold at your place of business. If a certain store doesn't have what you need then go somewhere else that does. It's that simple...
what is sold, sure, to whom it is sold no
@@kharnynb No they should be able to determine who it's sold to, and those who are denied should be able to complain about it and let the public decide whether they want to keep going to that business.
i'm sure most countries have had this argument many years ago, the us a bit late in the 60's, but "whites only" should not return....@@vampocalpyse
@@vampocalpyseagreed! Because if you can refuse service to someone not wearing a shirt or shoes, same applies if an owner discriminates on any other factors including race/religion/orientation etc. I would emphasize I would appreciate any business not to enact those prejudices, but to lawfully prohibit their ability to do so I don’t agree.
@@kharnynb yes, even to whom is sold to. Dont like it, find another business that will take your money
This was a weird supreme court case. You realize the gravity of the case when you switch the people from gay to black. Can a baker refuse service to black customers? That's what the civil rights sit-ins of the 50s and 60s were all about.
Except, being gay is not the equivalent of being black. And as a black person, I think it is a slick racist take. Being black is not the equivalent of everything people dislike. These things are not the same. You can be in support of both. But stop the whole "what you don't like XYZ...well, that's the same as not wanting black people". What??? Stop.
@@seatrea5518 I'm not arguing that being black is wrong, or the same thing as being gay. However, I am pointing out that the difference between the way people with these identities are treated legally seems unfair. After all, many racists of the time justified their beliefs through improper interpretations of the bible. Personally, I'm just hopeful that the evil woke leftist corporations will drive all the evil far-right fascists out of business, or vice versa. If the Supreme Court wants capitalism to decide our fate, then so be it.
Bro no, don't go down this rabbithole. :(
don't care about truth? About what's right? Live in ignorance and be a bad person? What the hell is wrong with you?
Not sure Ben Shapiro has ever spouted truth.
🤡@@bosox1640
@@bosox1640 cope harder
@@SeraphimBarca 🤣 ok got me…why don’t you go debate some 19 year olds like benny boy 🤡
Alex, you hit the nail on the head, "these are the people responsible for..." It's time to put logic back into education.
I love that the beginning of this video is just Alex roasting everyone’s appearance for no reason 🤣
People should never be forced to go against their beliefs even if it's something I don't agree with or believe in myself. Governments need to take a step back and focus on running our countries properly instead of worrying what people do and think.
The problem is, he's not talking about religious freedom being impeded. What he's actually talking about is a right to discriminate under the guise of religious freedom. Freedom of religion entitles you to follow your religion and live the way your religion tells you to live. It doesn't say you have the right to tell others how to live or discriminate against them because they don't adhere to your religious views.
'A public, for profit business'
No, it's a private business. And as long as they don't violate federal law, they can do whatever they want as a business and suffer the consequences
Right!!! Education by these professors if lacking! And body language on point! Baldy gave up half way through
if a store doesn't wanna carry a product, they shouldn't have too.
Dang that video was cut weird wish we heard the whole thing
The only person Ben Shapiro has ever embarrassed is his wife - a doctor and professional with a real job and a real education. Maybe his parents too.
Cry harder
And Ben wasn't a graduate from law school ? And the youngest syndicated columnist ever, and owns a business that has a 200 million per year turnover., his parents and wife are very proud I'm sure.
And lots of doctors are morons. ( not doctor shapiro) I'm sure .
It's their pharmacy and bakery ect. Let them sell what the want or don't want to sell. They pay the taxes and rent ect. Let them do what they want with it. They've already paid for that right.
what they want, sure (to a point, a pharmacy has a duty of care to a point similar to a doctor), to whom to sell...no, that's discrimination and illegal in the eyes of the law
So when you see footage of diners refusing to serve black patrons in the 1960’s you are on the side of the diner owners?
Just got to the first major edit cut. Anytime I see those with a biased title I check out. Makes me feel like they edit out any decent argument someone had against them. You can make anyone look dumb through editing. Play it in full and let people decide for themselves, not just “here’s MY highlights, don’t worry I left everything else out.”
Never forget a Government mandate is always under the threat of death; that’s the implied power.
I don't understand how anyone can think the helium chipmunk has valid opinions.
The fact that they’re comparing LGBT rights to religion is kind of crazy.
I'm not a fan of Shapiro, but I'm glad you do these videos and can listen to him intelligently and critically. It's good to hear opinions on both ends of the spectrum to strengthen your ideas.
The only thing about Ben im not a fan of is his take on religion
Facts I may like Ben Shapiro but I don't always agree on somethings but he ain't wrong as well but at the same time I like debates like these you start to see the truth that America won't see the light of day.
Oh cool, dude that uses nothing but logical fallicies is back on the internet to prove why his wife stays dry.
Ben is just akin to the worst troll you can find.
Has anyone of you seen the Ben Shapiro and Neil deGrasse Tyson. Ben gets absolutely destroyed and you see how little he knows about the stuff he´s talking about.
Pen Jillette from Pen and Teller is an excellent speaker when it comes to the topics of personal liberties and our governing laws. To summarize one of his statements: At the end of every law is a person that must enforce that law. The person enforcing the law usually carries weapon. So when the government imposes a law on its citizens it will be enforced at gunpoint.
Post what you want.A Broadened Mind is a great thing.People don’t have to agree.You Are the Best Alex!!!
"Are you afraid of the word gun?" her hair is pink. We don't know exactly what they are suppose to be afraid of... yet
As a capitalist market. I believe in private owned businesses should be able to sell whatever THEY choose. And that goes both ways. You can make a bakery that ONLY does gay cakes. Their choice. And that’s fair.
Gay cakes? That is a combination of two words I’ve never come across in a sentence not uttered by a teenager
You're arguing in favour of a completely free market, which no actual economist will ever do (for good and honestly obvious reasons). The law clearly states you can't discriminate against protected classes, and business owners aren't above the law
If the pharmacy doesn’t sell the item you want to purchase GO TO A DIFFERENT PHARMACY. The answer is not use government to force that pharmacy to sell that item.
A store should not be forced to sell anything the store does not want to sell. I think that should be obvious, right?
Conservatives don’t believe people are born gay. This is WRONG, the discrimination laws were created because here in America it’s against the constitution to refuse someone their rights because of something they can’t change like their ethnicity.
It should be obvious, but nowadays not so much, unfortunately
Damn I like this channel...Great job Alex.
2 things, first they are professors most likely tenured never working outside the educational system. So they probably have little experience with private sector employment.
Second is a question. You said not giving 2 weeks notice before quitting a job is a bad thing. Why? No job ever gives you a 2 week notice if they are letting you go or laying you off and are not expected to. I believe you should treat them like they treat you.
Certain states have laws that can actually not benefit the person quitting without proper notice. Also, it could affect any references you may desire. Otherwise it really is just a formality.
It's a cultural expectation. You don't HAVE to follow it, but you should know that not doing so may have social ramifications.
@@rodjacksonx That’s the problem, social stigma for you if you don’t give the employer time to find a replacement (that is what the 2 weeks is supposed to be for) but no social stigma for the employer if they have to cut back and lay you off or fire you without warning or time to find other employment. All I’m saying is It’s a double standard and and I find it suspicious that double standards always seem to favor corporations.
@@jmc1559 - It's definitely a double standard. And I have no doubt it was first introduced by big business (or at least higher education on behalf of big business.) But it's so ingrained into society now (kind of like the scams of Valentine's Day and diamonds) that you need to weigh the cost if you are considering going against it.
I'm not saying people shouldn't do it. But they shouldn't do it and then complain when a decent employer actually gets hurt from it, or when they get blacklisted in their community.
The concept that a person can walk out of a job is not such a massive mic drop because the same argument can be extrapolated to things such as sweatshops and dangerous work environments that kill the people who work there such as via poisoning or over work etc. Complete lack of government control leads to anarchy which invariably leads to a new group in control and probably a worse scenario.
Most of these issues are complex multi faceted issues that require a balance of government control for the benefit of the people and personal freedom.
I don’t have the answers.
This video makes me like you even more. I love that you are willing to listen and to really think about the words that are being said instead of just immediately disregarding the argument solely based on who is making it.
The pharmacy can decide to not sell the items if they feel it is wrong.
UK here, but I find conservatives complain about what people are doing to their lives, and liberals complain that not enough is being done to interfere with conservative's lives.
Every big liberal action is "make everyone else do what we do"
And every big conservative action is "don't make us do what those people are advocating"
The govt. Should definitely not be imposing demands of abortion on anyone or company. Its a free market, not a socialist dictated workplace. If I want to work for a company that provides abortion healthcare, ill find one that does and work for them, or maybe just wear a rubber..?
they all just got owned
Thank you its been too long ben shaprio
“Embarrassed” 😂 the only thing embarrassing here is your haircut.
it's a difference between PRIVATE and PUBLIC as far as pharmacies go. Pharmacies must be licensed to sell medication, even if it's a mom and pop shop. If CVS says "all CVS pharmacies must provide X drug" then all CVS pharmacies MUST provide said drug. However, a privately owned pharmacy that has already received a license should only be forced to STOCK what medical supplies they choose. Forcing them to stock "plan b" drugs can force them to pull actual life saving medication off their shelves. All pharmacies have a limited stock size and must make difficult choices of what to keep and what not too. When your grandfather has a heart attack because he can't get ahold of his nitro medication thanks to forced stock shelves of "plan b" meds, what are you going to say? "Some sacrifices must be made!"
As a business owner you should be allowed to sell the products you choose to. To whom you choose to sell them. Now, if you choose to sell/do devisive things that will directly affect your businesses success. I completely understand that a business owner may have a religious/personal "crisis of conscience" with a product or service and choose to not sell it. That said a customer has a choice to buy those products elsewhere, other local businesses and from the internet and by all means post loudly on social media why they were refused service so like minded people can also refuse to buy from that retailer, but the reverse is true also.
Momma always said stupid is as stupid does.
To add some context, this video was a debate circulating around the merits of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Inc. in 2015. This debate occurred BEFORE the US Supreme Court handed down its decision to strike down the Contraceptive Mandate of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Hobby Lobby was a Private Corporation whose owners were openly Christian. The ACA's Contraceptive mandate required ALL employers to provide healthcare coverage which included plans which provided coverage for contraceptives such as the "Plan B" pill (an abortion inducing drug taken the day after unprotected sex). Hobby Lobby objected under the 1st Amendment and the 1993 Religious Freedom Act.
While SCOTUS ultimately struck down the mandate for private companies for religious reasons, the case Shapiro is making here is the one Hobby Lobby was making. It goes to the greater idea that the government, under the cloak of the ACA, was forcing its ideology on the business, thereby infringing on its owners' religious liberties.
Healthcare being an earned privilege is an absolute joke. If I had the ability to have a functioning practice with help available for free, I would. I know many would take advantage of it, but many could also seek care they truly need and not worry about a thing. The weight of stress alone is killing people. I abhor how the Healthcare availability benefits those who can afford it and fails the ones that can't. The people on roofs or in storm drains keeping cities running, working themselves to death. Not people that sit on stages and complain about how they think any one person should determine anothers life. Too much hate makes the world turn.
I don't think it's healthcare that's the big issue. I think it's the fact that our food is detrimental to our health, our polluted environment has bred countless new diseases and has made other diseases much more prevalent, and our neglect of mental health in the way our society is built has created the perfect storm of sickness and disease. Once that has been addressed and dealt with, healthcare would become a much easier subject to handle.
Mr Clean here doesn’t understand the difference between public and private businesses.
He seems to think that because a business does business with the public that they are public.
No professor! All businesses do business with the public in one way or another!
Public, in a legal sense, means that it is government run. Private means it is run by a citizen!
Got it?
Damn son! I’m not even a professor and I know that!
was wondering when you'd get back to it lol
The answer is..... 42.
A business should be allowed to do anything it chooses to do, just as I can choose which business I work for and which ones I support with my money. We forget how powerful the regulation of profit is in our country. It wont take long for a business to act in the general community's best interests or they wont last long, and the best part is that the government isn't the entity in charge of regulating it since they absolutely suck at regulating anything.
The bald guy looks like he’s sleeping
any business should have the right to provide the products and services they see fit. if you as a consumer dont like what a business offers, vote with your dollar and shop a competitor.
I think that smart business would be carrying the different types of contraceptive measures, but, they shouldn't be forced to do so if they don't want. Some places serve Pepsi, some places serve coca cola, do we need to mandate that every place carries both?
i love these. keep 'em coming, alex! 👍
honestly above all else our forefathers designed the constitution, The Bill of Rights, and the declaration of independence for absolute freedom. And that means you can sell things that you want to sell and buy things that you want to buy and it’s your responsibility as a citizen to choose to participate in what you want to live by. But if you don’t like it, go away to another place WITHIN AMERICA where your beliefs align with the people that love there, ideally with respect for your neighbors as well, is what I believe the forefathers initially intended.that’s the beauty of this place is freedom to believe and choose to spend your money on whatever you want and if you don’t like something you don’t have to participate. but you should never be restricted from doing what you want to do as long as it doesn’t hurt anybody.
I'm now even more of a fan of your content just for this alone. Nicely done!
The older gentleman on the right, is Michael Medved. Radio host and Jewish Conservative commentator. His show was nationwide for years.
Bot
as a european i believe, everybody should be able to sell (or not sell) what ever the f they want in a privatly owned buisness, as long as its not illegal.
Can't wait for the Nick Fuentes panel, Alex!
I agree. You nailed it. Freedom has never been easy & it is challenging. People are so self seeking these days. It’s wrong to force what we believe on others but cry when it is done to us. Hypocrisy at its finest. People, including business owners, should never be forced. It’s supposed to be a free country. Government will always end up controlling who wins & who loses if we allow them to intervene. 2020 is a great example of that.
I literally said "say it with your chest" with you
The first amendment is structured that way for a reason when the government can force you to go against your religious beliefs then they can and will force you to do whatever they want.
Give them an inch, they take a mile.
I won't deny that I agree with Shapiro on some things. On others, we couldn't be more at odds.
Even if he weren't a transphobic bigot, I'd dislike him for his personality. The guy radiates smugness.
The thing about the cake place was that the cashier said they were welcome to anything that was premade in the case, so it wasn't like he was throwing them out of the store. They could have easily bought a cake topper somewhere else or probably found someone else to make it. Activist groups backed by big money do this to target religious conservatives all the time. Certain reps join in, I'm sure, the in name only types like McConnell, Bush or Chris Christie. "Agree with me or you don't get a livelihood" as far as on that level needs to stop. Thanks for doing some more political stuff. It's frustrating at times, but certain things we need to know . Love ya XOXO
factually inaccurate. The clients in the Baker case asked for an Undecorated plain white cake, they stated that THEY would provide the topper themselves. There were no words written and no decorations. they were refused.
you mean just like many republicans seem to think that "in god we trust" and the pledge of allegiance should be obligatory and kids have been punished for not participating?
@@kharnynbthere may be a small group of conservatives that feel that way, but the majority feel that everyone should be able to believe what they believe. Don't try and group all from one political party together based upon a small portion.
So let me get this straight, a little discrimination is fine but alot of discrimination is bad? How about no discrimination is good. Regardless your telling of the case in inaccurate as already stated.
@@andrewvasquez7872 then I would appreciate if you would point me to the factually correct, and please no Legacy media, because they spin everything, even Fox and newsmax spin it, because they're all owned by Mr. Murdock or similar. If they really did just see they were gay and throw them out, then yes, pretty sure that's illegal, and if not, its a jackarse thing to do, but nobody should be required to write any message. If you have a private business and don't want to write a religious message on a cake, then you should be able to say, sorry, you can get the cake but I'm not writing that. I don't know about the pledge of allegiance, pretty sure that was actually brought about when they started high school in the early 1900's. Before the presidents went on the wall, Jesus was on the wall, and school started with the Lord's prayer. I don't know if I'd want that, I'm baptized RLDS but don't practice. If you had to place me anywhere, I guess I'm kind of a Viking. Schools should probably follow Marva Collins technique if anything. and yes the activists groups do that to conservatives, because they're not the same people that just wanted people to be nice to gay people. In fact, I can pretty much say goodbye to being in music because while I'm not that conservative overall, I live in Oklahoma, so it's going to be assumed. So at this point, still don't have any probably with LGBT individually, but I think the movement oughta take a look at what 90% of the world is doing, and maybe reconsider their approach.
So many "Hitler-ate-sugar" moments in these comments. Guess they have to when the logic of the argument being discussed is clearly in Ben's favor, and so all people have to go on is personal attacks unrelated to the argument.
They're a pharmacy....supply the drug and mind your business. Get out of the business if you don't want to supply your customers. A wedding cake isn't killing anyone. If a business doesn't want your patronage, it's their choice just as it's your choice to go elswhere to contract your needs. Have to see both sides.
..."Ben Shapiro effect" it's called "Gish-gallop" and it's a bad form of arguing. He sprays out several points all at ones so fast you can't rebut any of them with any focus. It's not that Ben thinks fast.. it's that he's unfocused.
And yeah the guy on our far left is exactly right in his response. "Mr. Clean" is NOT saying you don't have the right to complain. He's trying to point out that Ben's assertion that religious freedoms are oppressed or curtailed in America is - paranoia at best and more likely a flat out lie and he's using countries that do not have freedom of religion as contrasting examples. yeah then he does put an argument in peoples mouths...
See. here's the difference between religious freedoms and what Ben is actually advocating for. Ben is trying to use "religious freedom" as a way to allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
So does a business have the right to refuse service? I think ... sure. why the fuck not. Have them post a sign on the door saying 'no gays are served here'. Then is another business allowed to post a sign saying 'no blacks are served here' - ah.. see.. You cannot use freedom of religion to discriminate against innate traits! THAT is facism sir.
Yes absolutely a business must have a license to operate and they must operate within the laws of the land. One of the laws of the land is not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. This is not a religious choice! It's bigotry plain and simple.
Yes they are having difficulty understanding what Ben is saying. They're in the situation and reacting emotionally - Except Mr. Clean. Ben's use of the word gun is specifically designed to upset and distract Red dye job... and it works.
@15:53 What do I think... well we've already argued that an employee can simply quit if they do not like the deal with the employer because it includes serving people or providing a service they disagree with. If that's fair then we can extend the same 'consensual relationship' to a business and the sphere of governing laws they operate in. If the license for operating a pharmacy includes providing plan B as a service, but you disagree with that requirement then ... well ... guess what? You can quit! Close up your pharmacy and go somewhere else. That's your right.. oh.. not so easy is it? well... just because an employee has the right to quit a job does not mean they effectively have that option available to them at no cost! What's good for an employee ... is good for an employer right?! right?!? I'll bet no one on the panel sees this.
The body language - yeah that's a reaction to Shapiro all right. LOL Not because they don't believe what they say. It's just that Ben sucks the air out of the room.
Thought provoking stuff but also its nice alex can explain certain things
16:41 Legitimately frightening, isn't it? 😒
No. Are these businesses government owned? No. Therefore, they shouldn’t have a say in the selection of prescriptions they sell. When the government starts to control the specifics of what services or details of what inventory privately owned companies offer, they’re acting as a communist government. China does this. The business owners there don’t actually own or control their business. The government literally physically comes in to check on & control them. Our government has already overstepped regarding these issues imo. For years. There’s several laws in place that impede on a private business owners ability to actually operate in an independent way.
Or if I work at McDonald's should I sue them because I only get one free lunch and not a free dinner
If 2 guys want a catholic wedding, There’s many priests for and opposed to marrying them. Every person has a right to choose their beliefs and have respect therefore you can respect the priests and the two guys right to their beliefs without force
You don't gave the right to rewrite the rules of Catholicism. Or choose. A priest can't get decide something. He Is bound by Canon law and the church hierarchy. And thry are bound by tradition.
Oh. NO...
You take rights by slowly cutting away small seemingly reasonable concessions to use as justification in the future for more concessions, until you have nothing left.
The only way to protect your rights is taking a hard line stance on something no one wants to protect for it's content and instead protect it to secure the right. In the future you can point to this objectionable thing that is protected as the standard to throw against people trying to take rights one small reasonable slice at a time.
Completly off-topic, but I'm sure you'd like discovering / reacting to Blackbriar. It's an awesome symphonic metal female fronted band from The Netherlands. Just in case...
8:20 - If he says that the "non-discrimination" applies to businesses, then that means the Constitutions protection of rights applies to _everyone,_ not just the government. As we have seen in prior case law, this _is not the case,_ as the left gleefully points out on the regular.
I like hearing other people’s thoughts on things. Neither side is 💯 right or wrong.
They are though!
The answer is no to both questions if you said yes you are the problem not the solution
Can you do the Ben Shapiro/Ana Kasparian debate video? It’s pretty recent, and I think it’s on The Daily Wire.
he won't because conservatives watch more videos hence he'll never listen to an opposing view. unless it's like a conservative approved jimmy dore clip or something.
@@christophermarang.3569you know that UA-cam is largely liberal bias right? Your argument makes zero sense.
@@N.Cognito if you think that you make no sense the only people who have ever been banned on youtube for their leaning are people who are lawsuit risk. Alex Jones had to get sued for 3 billion dollars for UA-cam to ax him, people like Adain Ross and Sneako were doxing people and making pointedly bigoted statements which are direct violations of the terms of service, and Andrew Tate sold how to be a pimp starter kits. People like Ben and Candice and Kurt and Carlson are still free to push there theories and light racism however they see fit because the follow the very loss definition of the rules that UA-cam barely enforces.
because he is courting a right wing audience. I have never seen him watch any left wing content, all he does is X destroys feminists, or Y destroys xyz. He knows what he’s doing. Sad really. Spreading the brain rot
Har har. A man crossing his legs.
Should we require Muslim stores to provide me pork?
Should Jewish delis be forced to be open on the Sabbath?
Why won’t vegan shops sell me steak??
Good point... we should be pissed that private citizens are using public government resources to go after other private citizens.
Somebody refuses to serve you, vote with your wallet and go somewhere else...tell all your friends, etc.
People should learn to protect themselves and stop waiting on the courts to come to their rescue.
@@cenobytecode Exactly! You know that there were at least two or three other bakers the couple could have gone to but they specifically targeted Masterpiece Bakery for a payday!
Again, try that at a muslim bakery and see how far you get!
if you have a bar that only serves non alcoholic beverages should you be forced to sell alcohol ??? if you have a vegan restaurant should you be forced t serve non vegan dishes ?!?!? if you have a NON vegan restaurant should you be forced to serve a Vegan client??? yes questions ,personal liberties , and in the end if you run a private business do you have the right to refuse business based on your believes and moral values and at the same time can you discriminate based on the same believes and moral values?
Yes. contraceptives
Is that Levine doing the moderating? Sounds like him.
the full video- "AM 770 KTTH Religious Freedom Debate"
Whatever it is I'm against it.
This has been censored by UA-cam friend.
Isn't this the dude who got super nettled about the Barbie movie and complained about Hari Neff having a deeper voice than HIS?
No pharmacy shouldn't and the point the gov should pick up the tab on the 4 bc. No then indirectly the gov is violating the religious beliefs of more than mentioned in the discussion. People paying the taxes are footing the bill for those contraceptives.
‘Professor’ is just a title. Doesn’t represent competence
From my German perspective it's just absurde how you guys in the US value religious feelings so high.
Should everyone believe what they want, free choice. But for heaven's sake, you're going to be a pure nation of Karens with all the hurt feelings.
Most of us don't give a shit about that. It's these left wing, right wing motherfuckers that make it such a big deal. What you see in the press is sensationalism. It is NOT America.
It's kind of one the reasons it was founded. It's understandable it's such a big deal.
My take has always been people should be allowed to dictate what they sell and who they sell to without government intervention. If you dont sell that gay wedding cake guess what word gets around people will stop going to your bakery, if you dont sell plan b another pharmacy will word will get around and you will lose business, the greatest thing about capitalism is that soneone will take advantage of you not selling something and thrive. Its the marketplace of ideas. And if its a bad idea then it will not reap rewards.
I'm just glad to hear what Uganda did and it's what more countries should do (not bow down to the mob). Ben Shapiro did well with this debate. Sad thing is that america is a godless place and they want to follow themselves or things of this world, instead of follow Jesus who can free us from these wrong/evil things.
You *NEED* to listen to Legendary, it’s my single favorite Skillet song
Who is this Ben Shapiro, seriously ?
What rock have you been living under
A very sad, insecure man in his 40s who got mad salty over Barbie movie.
@@brandondavis7387 Well I live the other side of The Pond where Ben Shapiro means nothing.
Dood should go be a rapper.
American health being linked to employment is the problem. Pay the employees and let them buy their own health care and if unemployed then a social welfare health care should be available. Your health policies is less than Christian and Jesus would condemn the lack of care in your health care.
Knocked loose deep in the willow/everything is quiet now
The Ben Shapiro effect is actually "let me talk super fast and with confidence so that everybody thinks I'm a genius. And because all my compilations are just me DESTROYING the left (as in kids who show up to my lectures and whose mic I can have shut down whenever I want to) and pointing at imagined hipocrisy, people actually think my arguments stand up to scrutiny. Who cares that whenever I try to wear my big boy pants I get exposed for being a grifter or a pundit with nothing to defend my position but my feelings? I DESTROY SJW'S FOR BREAKFAST!!!"
Ben Shapiro is so dumb that, as a solution to rising sea levels, people who live near the shore should just sell their houses and move. I didn't know fish were investing on the housing market, but apparently Ben Shapiro has some insider information
Everything you said is just wrong.
@@Neat0_o wow. I never thought of it that way. But now that you've put it so eloquently I guess I have no other option than to change my mind.
Now, when you're done sobbing and are able to properly see the keyboard, please come up with an actual counter-argument instead of "nuh-uh"ing like a child
From what I've heard, his argument for moving because of rising sea levels is directed at the "elites" who are telling us the sea levels are rising yet many of them own multiple beachfront homes, some of which were purchased after saying it's a catastrophic issue.
@@TheRealVarzens counter argument to what, tho? you haven't provided any counter arguments to anything shapiro said, you just accused him of a bunch of things with no specific examples (except some comment about rising sea levels?). is he always correct? no, of course not, nobody is. but you haven't exactly proven how he's wrong, about anything, really. you just called him dumb, basically. and you seem very angry, too, lol.
Ben Shapiro doesnt speak for the fishes..... Him saying people worried about rising sea levels is people living in an area, not ecological impact of fish population. To suggest otherwise is nonsense. I noticed you provided no statements as to why he is wrong in this clip. You also realize, it is not ben shapiro creating the edits of these debates right? If not you might want to rethink calling other people not intelligent.
as you asked in terms of the pharmacies and should they stock contraceptives even if it's against their religious beliefs? i'm going to say yes they should have to, as it is a medical service, as long as it is medical and legal it should be supplied in a pharmacy regardless of any religious views on the matter, at the end of the day it's sitting on a shelf and not doing you harm but could help somebody else.
of course this is a standalone for medical locations and if someone said you have to put a pumpkin in your window every Halloween then no cause that's ridiculous and you having that there won't benefit others in the same way medicines will in a medicinal shop.
in terms of the gay cake thing, i have just went away and read up on it and i stand with the bakeries decision as back then gay marriage was illegal in the country therefore it's harder for a business to take a stance either way as would alienate customers regardless, but they went for the path that also followed their religious beliefs and denied it and gave a full refund. Nowadays if it happened i'd still side with the bakery as even though gay marriage is legal now it would still go against beliefs and lets be real here cakes aren't here to help save lives or anything so therefore it falls to the shop in question and if they feel they should or should not make said cake.
long rambling short - if it helps save/benefit lives go ahead, if its just something indulgent then it's up to the discretion of the place
It would be better if u didn't interrupt so much... And "fast as f@ck" makes absolutely no sense