Best Dive Watch Under $600! Tudor and Rolex had a Baby!? They abandoned it like cowards...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @seandees9432
    @seandees9432 9 місяців тому +2

    Very good informative comparison and review for a homage Tudor watch

  • @CyberSammael
    @CyberSammael 10 місяців тому +3

    It's seriously impressive that this is a 500m diver with an exhibition back that somehow isn't 20mm thick!

  • @allanlarsen5098
    @allanlarsen5098 10 місяців тому +4

    Cool looking Steinhart.
    Looking forward to your review of the blue/blue 42 mm Ocean One.
    Whenever I'm finding it difficult to decide what watch to wear, I usually end up wearing that one.

  • @nedflanders3769
    @nedflanders3769 10 місяців тому +6

    The word “indices” is the plural form of “index”. So, for example, you could refer to the six o’clock index, or all the indices.

  • @scollyutube
    @scollyutube 10 місяців тому +13

    Steinhart badly needs an on the fly adjustable clasp. Should be standard at this spend level now.
    They would sell a lot to current owners of their watches updating their clasps too if they did.
    Completely agree how other channels ignore Steinhart, and then promote other brands that cost more, running Seiko movements etc......

    • @NoblesTx
      @NoblesTx 10 місяців тому

      YES so true. I’ll be replacing my steinhart clasp, shame.

    • @kobusvanrensburg4092
      @kobusvanrensburg4092 10 місяців тому +2

      Couldn't agree more. If Aliexpress brands can manage it, Steinhart should.

  • @danvann777
    @danvann777 2 місяці тому

    Great videos. I just pulled the trigger on this one to add to my collection. Reminds me of the Kobold Seal…. Great channel. Thank you.

  • @Linuxwarlord
    @Linuxwarlord 10 місяців тому +3

    Absolute banger of a watch, I wish titanium had some hardness coating to prevent blems from desk diving 😉

  • @michaelcoleman7260
    @michaelcoleman7260 10 місяців тому +3

    Good review Randy. That Steinhart looks great.

  • @stevemoreno6241
    @stevemoreno6241 10 місяців тому +1

    Good looking watch. The addition of the Mercedes logo or the snowflake squares on the hour hand actually serves the function of making it easier to see the hour hand when it's under the minute hand.

  • @joshuaschneck
    @joshuaschneck 10 місяців тому +2

    This is a dangerous channel for me. Just bought my second watch in 2 weeks. 😂

  • @007Chancellor
    @007Chancellor 10 місяців тому +2

    I. Love. Steinhart. Watches.
    Incredible quality - and not just "for the price." They'd be amazing watches at two or three times the price. I own two and I'm looking for a third. I'm not crazy bout titanium though - I like the heft and weight of stainless steel. I don't mind the fit of their female endlinks, but I absolutely agree about the clasp. They need a glide-lock style quick adjust to make these watches damned near perfect.
    Great review as always, sir. I really appreciate your channel. 😎👍

  • @derekshearer9049
    @derekshearer9049 10 місяців тому +2

    I own the 39mm titanium GMT 500m. Love it...

  • @ginom407
    @ginom407 10 місяців тому +2

    That is one Beautiful watch! I love that is doesn't have a Cyclops like other Steinharts. How is the weight compared to the Blue one? I like a watch with some weight! Great Review Randy! 👍👍👍

  • @DrBrito
    @DrBrito 10 місяців тому

    Great looking watch, and it's now added to my wish list.

  • @mattinmalaga
    @mattinmalaga 10 місяців тому +1

    Not liking the printed on indices (it is a word) nor the 'fence post' hand set, it cheapens the look, I prefer the Invicta 0420 but thanks for the review and keep them coming 👍🏻

  • @TT-ch2pz
    @TT-ch2pz 10 місяців тому

    This is my kind of watch. Brushed finish, 6 o'clock date, the case is over 40mm but not too thick.

  • @elbebe1000
    @elbebe1000 10 місяців тому

    Ohh I didn't knew that you have a watch channel and very informative. You have a new subscriber. Great job as usual. Please when have time include micro brands as CW, TRASKA, FARER...

  • @RGMGDA
    @RGMGDA 10 місяців тому

    Brilliant Review ! Nice Watch ! Yep ! Good Video ! 😊

  • @mrexon
    @mrexon 8 місяців тому

    Second vid I watched, nice vibes and your very positive in your way of reviews. I have ya a sub! 🤙 only watch guy I subbed btw

  • @patzguitarz
    @patzguitarz 10 місяців тому

    I really like this one except for the gloss bezel insert. It doesn't seem to match the tool aesthetic. A matte bezel insert would look better IMO.

  • @PINKFL0YD-s2h
    @PINKFL0YD-s2h 10 місяців тому +2

    I don't like the blue. Apart from that it's a good looking watch.

  • @briansullivan5222
    @briansullivan5222 10 місяців тому

    Really wanted the Pelagos. This is a great way to test the waters!!!!

  • @delp54
    @delp54 10 місяців тому

    And it is a formidable watch indeed. Owner’s honour.

  • @seandees9432
    @seandees9432 9 місяців тому

    Aliexpress had a very good deal on a San Martin chrono panda $225 so I had to pull the trigger on it after all of the favorible reviews unfortunatly the steinhart is probably to expensive for me and Invicta Ripsaw gold 7750 and the gold materpiece 7750 were to nice to pass up i like the larger automatic watches there are great deals on Aragon watches the super jet and armour have great styling quality and price in orginal very creative designs

  • @teecee9660
    @teecee9660 10 місяців тому

    what, no wrist shot? cmon, man..

  • @jlo8775
    @jlo8775 9 місяців тому

    🗑️ 🤡👍

  • @ionlybluffAA
    @ionlybluffAA 10 місяців тому +1

    nope. Rolex and Tudor did not have a baby....

    • @cheapwatchman_official
      @cheapwatchman_official  10 місяців тому +5

      the paternity test isn't back yet. We don't know. We just don't know yet,

  • @LuisLanza-w4u
    @LuisLanza-w4u 10 місяців тому +1

    That watch sucks better get a glycine.