Thank you! Fun fact: You type 8.4 but the Tiguan 190 HP Video you made, the Tiguan was slower and there you wrote 7.9 although this car does it faster in my opinion.
@@pillred597462 is higher by 3,3% than 60 mph. Just because of that it cannot be 0,2 s. because 0,2 s is less than these 3,3%. If the car accelerates in a vacuum, it is possible that it would be 0,3 more in this situation. But, we are accelerating in air, with high pressure, and the airflow drag increases with the square of speed. Compare 0-100 km/h and 0-140 km/h. It is only 40 km/h, and still, 0-140 km/h time is almost two times longer than 0-100 km/h.
Going by that though it would take another 2 seconds to reach 70mph which is .5 of a second for every 2mph 62 to 70 that can't be right it would not take 10.4 seconds to reach 70mph. half a second longer for that extra 2mph is 7% longer in time. @@1001cars
@@pillred5974I assume you do not even try to understand that every next 1 km/h costs significantly more. Acceleration to 112,7 km/h takes 11,5 seconds, so almost 46% more than 0-96 km/h when the increase in speed is only ~17%. Also: the time difference between 0-100 km/h and 0-60 mph is not 7, but 6,1%
Not necessarily. I've got a Mk 7 Golf GTD with a 6 speed DSG. It weighs 1302kg Book it has 181hp and 350-380 NM torque. Says 7.5 seconds to 60. I've not timed it . The quashqai is 1600kg+ so for a heavier car than the golf it is pretty similar.
Me again, have the QQ and it is not noticeably slower than my Golf was imo. Bear in mind you're doing everything with a single speed direct drive transmission so the power delivery is very linear, you don't have the different ratios like usual Auto or manual transmission.
The new engine is sweaty. The old petrol 1.3 engine (2019-2022) with 158 hp had better acceleration values. And the fuel consumption was not bad either. I hope these e-power motors will be improved. Things are looking a lot better with the new X Trail. 214 hp to 100 in 7 seconds.
@@ivan1178-p3h The qashqai 1.3 dig-t with 160 hp - year 2019-2022 has about 8 sec. I can confirm that, because i have this car. ua-cam.com/video/VCVQCr6WhGs/v-deo.html
I have purchased one which will be delivered in May. I can't wait to ride with it.
Thanks for all the testing you do.
cool
Thank you for all your testing.
Thank you! Fun fact: You type 8.4 but the Tiguan 190 HP Video you made, the Tiguan was slower and there you wrote 7.9 although this car does it faster in my opinion.
Tiguan? I did not test Tiguan with 190 HP
Thanks for this video! I'm just curious, what was the cabin noise level at max speed? :-)
Unfortunately I do not measure it precisely
@@1001cars No a problem, I just asked about your personal feelings comparing to other cars.
It's really quiet
surprised it took a half-second extra to go from 60 to 62mph, which is the difference between 60mph and 100 kph. 7.9/8.4
Why are you surprised? :)
Because it's only a 2mph difference, that would not take half a second no way .2 of a second maybe at most.@@1001cars
@@pillred597462 is higher by 3,3% than 60 mph. Just because of that it cannot be 0,2 s. because 0,2 s is less than these 3,3%. If the car accelerates in a vacuum, it is possible that it would be 0,3 more in this situation. But, we are accelerating in air, with high pressure, and the airflow drag increases with the square of speed. Compare 0-100 km/h and 0-140 km/h. It is only 40 km/h, and still, 0-140 km/h time is almost two times longer than 0-100 km/h.
Going by that though it would take another 2 seconds to reach 70mph which is .5 of a second for every 2mph 62 to 70 that can't be right it would not take 10.4 seconds to reach 70mph. half a second longer for that extra 2mph is 7% longer in time. @@1001cars
@@pillred5974I assume you do not even try to understand that every next 1 km/h costs significantly more. Acceleration to 112,7 km/h takes 11,5 seconds, so almost 46% more than 0-96 km/h when the increase in speed is only ~17%. Also: the time difference between 0-100 km/h and 0-60 mph is not 7, but 6,1%
Thanks a lot for the test! Which tyres were you running?
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV 235/45 R20 100 V XL with "D" efficiency
@@1001cars Great, thank you!
I have qashqai e power and I have a question. Is there a limitor at 180?
Yes, as you could see, the speed is limited to 180 km/h (dash speed) = 175 km/h (GPS speed)
@@1001cars How can I remove it? In service?
@@DoruqTV As far as I know it is not possible, it is the limitation of the electric engine
190hp with 330Nm and only 8.4 with such power it should be at least a second faster
Not necessarily. I've got a Mk 7 Golf GTD with a 6 speed DSG. It weighs 1302kg Book it has 181hp and 350-380 NM torque. Says 7.5 seconds to 60. I've not timed it . The quashqai is 1600kg+ so for a heavier car than the golf it is pretty similar.
Me again, have the QQ and it is not noticeably slower than my Golf was imo. Bear in mind you're doing everything with a single speed direct drive transmission so the power delivery is very linear, you don't have the different ratios like usual Auto or manual transmission.
The new engine is sweaty. The old petrol 1.3 engine (2019-2022) with 158 hp had better acceleration values. And the fuel consumption was not bad either. I hope these e-power motors will be improved. Things are looking a lot better with the new X Trail. 214 hp to 100 in 7 seconds.
@@MuertTV 1.3 has 9.5 0-100
@@ivan1178-p3h The qashqai 1.3 dig-t with 160 hp - year 2019-2022 has about 8 sec. I can confirm that, because i have this car.
ua-cam.com/video/VCVQCr6WhGs/v-deo.html