The Room is technically a groundbreaking film that pushed at the boundaries of cinematic craft/technique through shooting on both film and digital at the same time. Unfortunately, like everything to do with The Room, it was terribly executed, illy conceived and just plain old shit.
@@budusbusham3324 My theory as to why he used two cameras, is that he had absolutely no idea what he was doing. When they asked him what format he wanted to use, he was so stubborn that instead of asking for help he just said both. Now he claims it was some genius and revolutionary idea, when it was more than likely just an ignorant guy with boatloads of money, and no experience.
basp 2005 Oh certainly. I don’t seriously think Tommy Wiseau is anything besides a rich blowhard that’s fallen in love with his own narcissistic delusions.
Kubrick actually filmed in both film and digital simultaneously for one of his movies. But the only reason he filmed digital was to have immediate footage of the film he could play back to the actors
@@budusbusham3324 That's not groundbreaking though. Not only had it had been done before, but it's completely pointless for any artistic purpose. The only reason to do it would be to have dailies turned around quicker. OR you're making a stereoscopic 3D movie.
Not really, if anything this shows me that Tommy isn't the stupid fool I think we all assumed him to be, but more that he simply couldn't act and had no experience in making a movie.
@@3rdeye931 I'm with you. These people acting like they could just jump in and make a film that wasn't also trash. Ok because of his accent and way of dress it looks a bit wierder than the average person but the smugness of these people annoy me.
@@fkatwigsisthequeenofenglan4748 Read the book The Disaster Artist, goes into good detail! If I remember correctly, Tommy W was paying them all very very well per month of shooting and so they pretty much all just got on with it!
Greg Sestero (Mark) said that months before the movie started filming Tommy had been working out endlessly. When Greg saw the extended sex scenes added in the script he understood why.
@@masterstepz9800 In “The Disaster Artist” by Greg Sestero who plays Mark, people giggling at the acting in the film was actually an every day thing. It was either giggling or absolute frustration because Tommy couldn’t remember her lines and was super difficult to work with
Film crews are always questioning the quality of the production, but nobody ever really knows how a movie will turn out. The English crews on Star Wars and Aliens bashed the movies during production, and thought the directors were buffoons. On the other hand sometimes a crew will think a movie is going to be a big hit and sweep the Oscars, while instead, the movie releases with a "thud". I have heard low budget crews talk about a fledgling director as though he was Orson Wells, calling him a genius. Anyway, it's just a job, and the best policy is to always take the job seriously and do the best you can so you can continue working in the future.
@@aliensoup2420 I am shooting some shit movie about robots- Arnold while filming The Terminator))) yes, he was rumored to say this to one of his friends.
I understand where your coming from, and I respect your right to have an opinion, but I’m not sure that you are fully aware of what you seem to be insinuating.
the amount of people who were involved in the production and just went along with it like it's normal is probably the most incredible part of it one of the greatest unintentional social experiments in modern history
it does go to show what a symbol of capitalist success Hollywood can be. A random maniac managed to get all these people working for him just because he could afford to pay them.
It's far from being the worst but it is not even close to mediocre it's really bad but it's funny as hell and keeps you watching because how weird it is . The 6 mil helped tho I bet if it was 2 mil it may have been.
Every production is going to have a crew that works their ass off. But honestly a director can make or break a film which is why they get so much kudos for so much hate if the production sucks. I worked professionally in many different roles and when I’ve been the director on a couple films basically what I say goes. I’m the final person that everyone goes to for approval. So you could start to see why a movie can fall apart really fast if a director is a complete moron.
This is a reminder that it takes a lot of hard work, passion, and dedication to make even a bad movie. I can't help but empathize with the amount of stress and the complexity of emotion Tommy must have been feeling while making The Room (regardless of the fact that those emotions didn't manage to make it to his character) . Whatever you may think of the movie, the commitment and focus required to pull everything together is an achievement in itself, and I have admiration for anyone who sets their mind on something and gets it done. It may not have been the hit it was intended to be, but it is a statement.
But it was a statement that cost him $6million in 2003 (equivalent over $10m today). If you had $10million you could just hire a producer and make a movie way better than The Room without even walking onto a set. He worked hard with dedication and passion, really, to become famous. He made the movie by throwing a shitload of money at it
I've seen him get intense and aggressive to fans at live screenings if he doesn't like their question. They likely just cut those moments out for the behind the scenes.
Say what you will about how shitty the movie was, you have to admire Tommy’s drive. He wanted to make a movie and went for it. He had a vision (albeit ridiculous and very much misguided) and he didn’t hesitate. Of course his mysterious bottomless pit of money helped too.
That's how he made it all in the first place. Tommy grew up poor and the real reason he doesn't talk about his past is because he's ashamed of being trafficked by slavic mafia. He's really a much more compelling person than people recognize him for. Most people seem to think they're just so much smarter, and more worldly than Tommy; all because he made a bad movie and had less emotional opportunities in life.
@@snowconeinthedoublecup It's a shit vanity project. He's earned every bit of ridicule he gets. Whether he's a nice guy, intelligent or whatever is irrelevant.
@@thecreeper18 yeah but I thought it was like 3 guys and a dog or something, this is a full blown professional production. It actually makes me depressed so much effort and work went into making the worst movie of all time
@@felipeaguena5289 i would really recommend the book "The Disaster Artist" by Greg Sistero the guy who played Mark. It is very good and its hilarious tells the story about the production and pre production, recommend the audio book version
When the mother who definitely had breast cancer started talking I was like wow she's really staying in character... then she started talking about how she took her inspiration from 2 other people = mind blown.
Edit: I'm totally wrong. The Chris-R scene took 5 weeks to film. That includes the original basketball/alley take and the football/roof take that was used in the film.
There's is something funny about how so much of the behind the scenes footage is just shots of the actual cameras. You just know Tommy was telling them film the equipment to show how it is a real big Hollywood film.
Ive always thought the person doing the behind the scenes stuff was given cart blanche to film whatever he wanted and was absolutely baffled by the double camera rig and kept focusing on it lol
4:15 I love how the camera crew was struggling so hard with the rig because they've never had to film on both at the same time. It just encapsulates how goddamn bonkers this madhouse of a film was to produce
I’m glad the FBI released this footage. We need more in depth analysis of major terrorist events like this. It provides closure for some of the victims of the cinematic atrocity as well. Thank you! ✨😃
Notice that there are two cameras wired to the same rig? Tommy wanted to be the first Director to ever film in two film types at the same time (35 mm and HD). Tommy had to hire separate crews for each camera, which doubled the cost of shooting. Only the 35 mm film was used for the movie. I don't believe the HD has ever been seen. I wish we had an HD version of The Room!
Read the book "The Disaster Artist" by Greg Sestero( he played the character "Marc" in the Room). There he explains in detail how the movie came about.
It blows my mind the movie actually got completed and had some type of release. 90% of movies like this never see the light of day and can't be finished filming and don't have enough to edit
It still amazes me when I see the camera set up with both digital and film running side by side, when people are astounding by how much was spent on the film I imagine it was for this very reason because got knows how many takes each scene took so not only are you paying for all the power needed for the digital camera you are paying for god knows how many reels of film, processing and then telecine. Even more amazingly it wasn’t for some type of creative reason to have both but I was because Tommy didn’t know the difference between the formats and he just thought having both made it all seem like he was achieving something special nobody did before because it is a ‘real hollywood movie’.
The Room is so nuanced. I don't think Tommys genius will ever be really appreciated in our lifetimes. I can't believe it only cost 6mill to bring this tear jerker to life. It blows my mind. Bravo Tommy Greenland is proud of you.
The amount of footage highlighting the dual camera setup (film/digital because tommy didn't know which was better) is hilarious. Whoever was making the behind the scenes documentary was clearly very confused by that
I recently saw The Disaster Artist, and I’m pretty shocked at how little Tommy showed respect to the cast/crew. He also acted so oblivious with their needs and working conditions
He’s even worse in the book version, you really get a feeling first hand from Greg’s perspective of how cruel Tommy became, the guy hired an actor to play Mark, refused to remember his name, then over the course of one day slowly phased the guy out and replaced him with Greg even after Greg made it very clear he didn’t want to act in the movie
The majority of the budget went on locations, sets and equipment. I read he filmed the entire thing on both film and digital, buying (not renting as is usually done) both cameras for full price. Back then cameras were a fortune, even more so than today. @@bushidoh8316
It’s like watching the Mona Lisa be painted. Cherish this footage.
Yes
The common factor being both Tommy and Leo tried really hard
It's like seeing damien hirst at work, to be more accurate.
You're tearing me apart, Mona Lisa!
I felt more like I was watching Vincent Van Gogh cut off his ear
This real Hollywood movie, this no Mickey Mouse stuff.
I loved the Disaster Artist, it‘s one of those Hollywood testaments
@@souljacem Agreed!
Real Hollywood movie where he did his best to make production uncomfortable
I read it with his voice lol
Nije ovo miki maus što bi rekao miroljub
This is an important piece of history right here
I just watched the movie on Netflix, now laughing my ass off, I never knew this movie "The Room" but this is GOLD hahahah
Demi is my middle name how did you watch it? Is it available?
It's definitely a piece of something.
Chip chip chip 🐔
I Read the book The Disaster Artist and wow was this the most dysfunctional movie production ever.
The fact that he filmed this with two cameras simultaneously is both astounding and ridiculous.
The Room is technically a groundbreaking film that pushed at the boundaries of cinematic craft/technique through shooting on both film and digital at the same time. Unfortunately, like everything to do with The Room, it was terribly executed, illy conceived and just plain old shit.
@@budusbusham3324 My theory as to why he used two cameras, is that he had absolutely no idea what he was doing. When they asked him what format he wanted to use, he was so stubborn that instead of asking for help he just said both. Now he claims it was some genius and revolutionary idea, when it was more than likely just an ignorant guy with boatloads of money, and no experience.
basp 2005 Oh certainly. I don’t seriously think Tommy Wiseau is anything besides a rich blowhard that’s fallen in love with his own narcissistic delusions.
Kubrick actually filmed in both film and digital simultaneously for one of his movies. But the only reason he filmed digital was to have immediate footage of the film he could play back to the actors
@@budusbusham3324 That's not groundbreaking though. Not only had it had been done before, but it's completely pointless for any artistic purpose. The only reason to do it would be to have dailies turned around quicker. OR you're making a stereoscopic 3D movie.
4:35 if you listen closely you can here a crew member off camera in the background say..."I got yelled at".
Yeah, was it an actor talking about a scene or was it staff like “the disaster artist” depicts? Anyways, how’s your sex life?
I think it was Denny
nice little easter egg
haha they look so professional, that makes it even more hilarious
ikr🤣
Not really, if anything this shows me that Tommy isn't the stupid fool I think we all assumed him to be, but more that he simply couldn't act and had no experience in making a movie.
And then there's the music.... XD
What’s funny about a guy chasing a dream? The product might be trash, but you have to respect the passion.
@@3rdeye931 I'm with you. These people acting like they could just jump in and make a film that wasn't also trash. Ok because of his accent and way of dress it looks a bit wierder than the average person but the smugness of these people annoy me.
It's so weird to see actual people taking this film seriously.
what about porn movies? hahaa
same I wanna know how the crew genuinely felt during filming
do you understand movies? do you understand life?
this is real made in Hollywood movie.
now you see
@@andrewaronson3364 ahh this is clear I do thanks
@@fkatwigsisthequeenofenglan4748 Read the book The Disaster Artist, goes into good detail! If I remember correctly, Tommy W was paying them all very very well per month of shooting and so they pretty much all just got on with it!
"The Room's a silly movie..."
But behind the scenes it looks like their directing the Star Wars prequels.
They initially thought they were making a real movie. Tommt didn't let the crew read the entire script. This ain't no Mickey Mouse stuff haha
The actress playing Claudette is unravelling that character way more than it needs, and it's hilarious to listen to.
That’s what I thought 😂🤣 there was absolutely no depth in any of the characters and she came up with this huge backstory lol
yeah, big guy? do you understand the movie?
this is like Hollywood movie. now you see
And that's why she did the best performance in this movie
@@KikeRorschach do you understand movie?
do you understand life?
@@Double21Stuffed thats what good actors do
Anybody else notice that Tommy Wiseau is absolutely ripped. Liked Shredded.
Fuck yea I didn’t notice till I saw his tank top but holy fuck
I'd go ahed and even say that he's more ripped than this dvd! Hahadadjokes
Thanks Disaster Artist.
beast
Greg Sestero (Mark) said that months before the movie started filming Tommy had been working out endlessly. When Greg saw the extended sex scenes added in the script he understood why.
2:56 the guy in the white shirt reacting to the line delivery
He’s the only one giving a genuine reaction. Others are so professional, as if this movie isn’t trash.
@@masterstepz9800
In “The Disaster Artist” by Greg Sestero who plays Mark, people giggling at the acting in the film was actually an every day thing. It was either giggling or absolute frustration because Tommy couldn’t remember her lines and was super difficult to work with
It looks far more like an actual movie set than I would have expected. Considering the results.
ikr and it looks way too serious
Seeing those two cameras set next to each other gives me tremendous anxiety.
I'm shocked they had the presence of mind to make a behind the scenes for this. Little did anyone know what a famous movie this would become.
The real purpose of this footage was for Tommy to spy on his own production.
don't start saying stuff like that without proof
It's to make it a REAL AMERICAN MOVIE
we need more mysteriously wealthy people to make more self insert movies like this
He sold counterfit jeans and other cheap clothing to make his fortune. ua-cam.com/video/cufePE5NaEM/v-deo.html
These people didn't realize they were creating a masterpiece
No film crew ever knows what the end result of a movie is going to be.
Poor Carolyn trying to give her character depth and meaning
I'm shocked that this masterpiece was not even nominated for an Oscar. Shame on you Hollywood.
Disaster artist was though
There was a whole team behind this. Crazy
job is a job, they getting paid, directors fault
The fact that everyone is taking this movie 100% seriously and noone is asking ‘wtf is this shit i’m part of’ makes it so much funnier
It's much MUCH funnier than it's portrayal in the disaster artist for this very reason. Like that film is way too on the nose on it's awfulness
Film crews are always questioning the quality of the production, but nobody ever really knows how a movie will turn out. The English crews on Star Wars and Aliens bashed the movies during production, and thought the directors were buffoons. On the other hand sometimes a crew will think a movie is going to be a big hit and sweep the Oscars, while instead, the movie releases with a "thud". I have heard low budget crews talk about a fledgling director as though he was Orson Wells, calling him a genius. Anyway, it's just a job, and the best policy is to always take the job seriously and do the best you can so you can continue working in the future.
@@aliensoup2420 Exactly. They were hired to do a job, no reason for them to rock the boat.
read the book that wrote greg sestero about the film if u can. there it says that everyone were all the time with WTF faces
@@aliensoup2420 I am shooting some shit movie about robots- Arnold while filming The Terminator))) yes, he was rumored to say this to one of his friends.
Little did the film crew know at the time, that they were creating the biggest masterpiece known to man kind...
It's so fascinating seeing an artist craft his work
Ya know for how much work goes into movie production, its amazing so many bad movies get made, consistently.
No matter how much work you put into a bad script, it will always be a bad script.
I'm probably gonna look to some bad movies cause I'm bored this period of time
I don’t like this slander on a obvious masterpiece...
I understand where your coming from, and I respect your right to have an opinion, but I’m not sure that you are fully aware of what you seem to be insinuating.
@@okk2776 Try Troll 2.
This footage is best viewed after reading The Disaster Artist. According to the book, Wiseau would view and listen to this footage to eavesdrop.
Omg😅
The irony of the FBI warning at the beginning is funny to me
Yes😂
Lmao
the amount of people who were involved in the production and just went along with it like it's normal is probably the most incredible part of it
one of the greatest unintentional social experiments in modern history
it does go to show what a symbol of capitalist success Hollywood can be. A random maniac managed to get all these people working for him just because he could afford to pay them.
@stproducciones9140 you just described most jobs
I got five minutes in before I realised this isn’t about Citizen Kane.
This is The Godfather right?
@@CoolDrifty Must be some Scorsese overrated shit
"Five minutes Ian? You know what, I haven't got five fuckin' minutes!"
but It is
I know it’s the worst movie ever, but you have to acknowledge how hard this man worked to make this movie happen, thanks for the laughs tommy
Do you mean how hard EVERYONE else did ? Even his script was rewritten by his actor friend
he's a deluded dick
It's far from being the worst but it is not even close to mediocre it's really bad but it's funny as hell and keeps you watching because how weird it is . The 6 mil helped tho I bet if it was 2 mil it may have been.
you mean "best movie ever"
Every production is going to have a crew that works their ass off. But honestly a director can make or break a film which is why they get so much kudos for so much hate if the production sucks. I worked professionally in many different roles and when I’ve been the director on a couple films basically what I say goes. I’m the final person that everyone goes to for approval. So you could start to see why a movie can fall apart really fast if a director is a complete moron.
This is a reminder that it takes a lot of hard work, passion, and dedication to make even a bad movie. I can't help but empathize with the amount of stress and the complexity of emotion Tommy must have been feeling while making The Room (regardless of the fact that those emotions didn't manage to make it to his character) . Whatever you may think of the movie, the commitment and focus required to pull everything together is an achievement in itself, and I have admiration for anyone who sets their mind on something and gets it done. It may not have been the hit it was intended to be, but it is a statement.
Intelligent comment. Thank you.
Absolutely. It’s incredibly hard to make a film. Even a short.
It seems to me like you are the EXPERT rejuveniledelinquent3522!
But it was a statement that cost him $6million in 2003 (equivalent over $10m today). If you had $10million you could just hire a producer and make a movie way better than The Room without even walking onto a set. He worked hard with dedication and passion, really, to become famous. He made the movie by throwing a shitload of money at it
Fuck I’m so happy he made a behind the scenes
And I love Lisa so much
None of these people know they're creating history
this made more sense than the whole movie
the making of art is simple, get
the canvas and the brush and create, but art itself is complex, hard to understand.
Thor Mungpi Tommy Wiseau, is that you?
@@jpbmjordan he is naaaaht
What if Tommy Wiseau is just a character the person we know as Tommy Wiseau is playing just to sell one movie..
@@abbashaidari8313 do you understand movies? do you understand life?
this is real made in Hollywood movie.
now you see
These men and women had no idea they were making a masterpiece of cinema
More like a campy masterpiece of extreme unintentional comedy that makes the razzies look like an Oscar.
As long as the checks cleared, they couldn’t care less what was going on
Franco's performance makes him look more intense than he actually is. He's just a little bizarre and detached.
Tommy wouldn't like to be seem like that of course
I've seen him get intense and aggressive to fans at live screenings if he doesn't like their question. They likely just cut those moments out for the behind the scenes.
I love how they kept focusing on the two cameras that Tommy bought.
Chris R and his timeless performance
Dude was an Olympic athlete and never did any acting beforehand.
Say what you will about how shitty the movie was, you have to admire Tommy’s drive. He wanted to make a movie and went for it. He had a vision (albeit ridiculous and very much misguided) and he didn’t hesitate. Of course his mysterious bottomless pit of money helped too.
And he have a lot of money
That's how he made it all in the first place. Tommy grew up poor and the real reason he doesn't talk about his past is because he's ashamed of being trafficked by slavic mafia. He's really a much more compelling person than people recognize him for. Most people seem to think they're just so much smarter, and more worldly than Tommy; all because he made a bad movie and had less emotional opportunities in life.
@@snowconeinthedoublecup It's a shit vanity project. He's earned every bit of ridicule he gets. Whether he's a nice guy, intelligent or whatever is irrelevant.
@@nagualdesign so long as we're talking about irrelevant who the fuck are you exactly???
@@nagualdesign does he seem like a nice guy to you?!...
WAIT, THERE WAS AN ACTUAL PRODUCTION TEAM?? THERE WAS A CREW AND EVERYTHING?!?! HOLY CRAP
@@thecreeper18 yeah but I thought it was like 3 guys and a dog or something, this is a full blown professional production. It actually makes me depressed so much effort and work went into making the worst movie of all time
@@felipeaguena5289it was bad because of Tommy, everyone else involved was at least somewhat competent
@@felipeaguena5289 i would really recommend the book "The Disaster Artist" by Greg Sistero the guy who played Mark. It is very good and its hilarious tells the story about the production and pre production, recommend the audio book version
You gotta read the Disaster Artist
6 million dollars to make it
This was one of the best movies I have ever seen!
- Stevie Wonder
@gonzoyork1908 if Steve saw this he wouldn't see it.
the fact that tommy wanted to shoot this on both digital and 35mm is insane lol.
And they didn't use the hd material
You misspelled genius
I like that you included the FBI warning for unauthorized reproduction. Nice touch.
Watching this it is amazing how it emulates a proper production, it even looks like a real movie.
They were filming the best movie of all time and they didnt even know.
It's like watching Kubrick work on the Shining. It's uncanny.
Yeah , and the only difference is one incorrectly set of wires
When the mother who definitely had breast cancer started talking I was like wow she's really staying in character... then she started talking about how she took her inspiration from 2 other people = mind blown.
You can hardly believe so much effort went into this.
6:00 Damn Tommy is ripped
@Carlos lol because that's the way us guys talk to eachother
You throw a ball every waking hour you get ripped.
2:31 This basically confirms that the Chris-R scene was filmed on August 15th, 2002. A monumental day in history.
Edit: I'm totally wrong. The Chris-R scene took 5 weeks to film. That includes the original basketball/alley take and the football/roof take that was used in the film.
“That’s history right there you understand?” - Howard Ratner(Uncut Gems)
*watches movie* “ holy shit I’m gonna cum”
There's is something funny about how so much of the behind the scenes footage is just shots of the actual cameras. You just know Tommy was telling them film the equipment to show how it is a real big Hollywood film.
Ive always thought the person doing the behind the scenes stuff was given cart blanche to film whatever he wanted and was absolutely baffled by the double camera rig and kept focusing on it lol
A true method actor. Tommy never slips out of character. Not even for a second.
How this cinematic masterpiece did not receive multiple accolades is beyond me. Bravo Tommy, Bravo!
Goosebumps everytime i hear the music
It’s good to know Tommy’s extremely consistent with his acting. His bad acting is on and off film.
4:15 I love how the camera crew was struggling so hard with the rig because they've never had to film on both at the same time. It just encapsulates how goddamn bonkers this madhouse of a film was to produce
The moment he said "I want to shoot 35mm and digital simultaneously, locked side-by-side" They should've known something was very wrong lol
The PAIN behind Greg’s eyes every time he comes on screen is hilarious
I didn't know this existed. After being aware of The Room for like 10 years.
same here LOL
I’m glad the FBI released this footage. We need more in depth analysis of major terrorist events like this. It provides closure for some of the victims of the cinematic atrocity as well. Thank you! ✨😃
This was filmed much better than the movie
Hollywood should learn from this masterpiece. No reboot no sequels!!!
This is history right here. Can’t believe such content is free nowadays.
Notice that there are two cameras wired to the same rig? Tommy wanted to be the first Director to ever film in two film types at the same time (35 mm and HD). Tommy had to hire separate crews for each camera, which doubled the cost of shooting. Only the 35 mm film was used for the movie. I don't believe the HD has ever been seen. I wish we had an HD version of The Room!
Holy shit I never knew they had so much equipment, so many crew members and budget! It looks so professional which makes the Room even more absurd
Read the book "The Disaster Artist" by Greg Sestero( he played the character "Marc" in the Room). There he explains in detail how the movie came about.
I want every streaming service to get The Room. I just love watching it!
But they say love is blind.
this made me realize how expensive shoots like this actually are. So much tech, stuff and so much more. Tommy is a legend!
13:55 “wait so if we’re shooting it on the roof why’re we shooting it here?” Johnny looked so annoyed 🤣🤣
Bro just said "No" as a response 😂 He had a vision lol
I didn’t know there was a behind the scenes, I thought it just happened
There are no accidents
this is a testament to how far chaotic energy can take you in life.
The Room changed me as a person. I became a different man after watching it. No other movie has moved me like that.
It blows my mind the movie actually got completed and had some type of release. 90% of movies like this never see the light of day and can't be finished filming and don't have enough to edit
@@TheGoodChap Tommy is a man of focus, commitment, sheer will... something you know very little about...
I thought it was just Tommy doing everything. Didn't know there was a whole crew. lol.
Yeah he spent millions lol
Ele achava que o filme dele ia concorrer ao Oscar 😂😂😂
Theres supposed to be hours and hours of this footage i wonder if it will ever be seen
The Blu-ray contains much more footage.
Did you mail them?
Yes, but there is much more than what's on the bluray. There should be many, many, many hours of behind the scenes.
Martin Kuhn 50th Anniversary remaster! Including every single behind the movie action
Yeah it says to mail him for more footage at the end of this video.
I DID NOT EXPECT THIS ON MY FEED!!
I DID NOT…
Oh, Hi Mark
You are my favourite customer
Oh, hi Johnny, I didn't recognize you.@@ArcanePath360
Did you know that 8 months later your comment would make some guy in Chicago laugh out loud late at night and wake people up? Well it did
They should have kept the part of the script in which it was revealed that Tommy was a vampire, so the movie would have made sense.
Was that actually part of the script?
@@PushSomeHeavyWeight Yes. Sad thing is it would've at least explained why Johnny looks and acts the way he does.
The whole set up is much bigger and more professional than I realized.
I love how the cast took their roles so seriously
Watching this movie cures my breast cancer.
Is it just me or does Tommy's English sound better here than it does in the movie?
Its not English, it's Neworleanish
yeah noticed that too. Maybe hes out of caracrter when in character and vice versa
You have it all wrong. Tommy speaks impeccable English, it’s us that have the stupid accent.
All of his lines are dubbed in the movie
yeah I agree, I think the pressure of the camera fries his brain even more than usual
It still amazes me when I see the camera set up with both digital and film running side by side, when people are astounding by how much was spent on the film I imagine it was for this very reason because got knows how many takes each scene took so not only are you paying for all the power needed for the digital camera you are paying for god knows how many reels of film, processing and then telecine. Even more amazingly it wasn’t for some type of creative reason to have both but I was because Tommy didn’t know the difference between the formats and he just thought having both made it all seem like he was achieving something special nobody did before because it is a ‘real hollywood movie’.
Tommy is the only person who is both ahead and behind his time
The Room is so nuanced.
I don't think Tommys genius will ever be really appreciated in our lifetimes.
I can't believe it only cost 6mill to bring this tear jerker to life.
It blows my mind.
Bravo Tommy
Greenland is proud of you.
this is like watching the formation of the earth and life itself. its sacred.
For the life of me, I don’t know why everything Wiseau does fascinates me
Same reason people go to the circus, they love the bizarre.
Don't think so much, it may not come out right!
same over here
The amount of footage highlighting the dual camera setup (film/digital because tommy didn't know which was better) is hilarious. Whoever was making the behind the scenes documentary was clearly very confused by that
I recently saw The Disaster Artist, and I’m pretty shocked at how little Tommy showed respect to the cast/crew. He also acted so oblivious with their needs and working conditions
He’s even worse in the book version, you really get a feeling first hand from Greg’s perspective of how cruel Tommy became, the guy hired an actor to play Mark, refused to remember his name, then over the course of one day slowly phased the guy out and replaced him with Greg even after Greg made it very clear he didn’t want to act in the movie
The crew looking soooo serious while filming what they had to know was a giant piece of crap is hilarious unto itself...
in the words of my favorite poker player " i won the pot i got paid"
A job is a job. They’re getting paid for it. Not their fault the director is an idiot
A equipe era qualificada, o problema é o tomy que nunca foi diretor e nem ator de verdade 😅😅
@@minenotyours212 It's true. That's why I can't fault them because they did the best they could to try and make what was obviously a bad idea good.
I'm surprised there's no sex scene in this Making of video
It takes that many people to make a movie so bad that’s it’s a masterpiece of cinema?
What a great movie soundtrack… and i love Lisa so much.
You are tearing me apart with this comment
@@tommym321 cheep cheep cheep cheep.... Hows your sex life?
Sooooo many people for a movie that could have been done with a crew of...3. Still being generous.
It's honestly surprising how they had $6M for budget and somehow didn't have enough to film the vampire scene. The whole movie looks $200.
The majority of the budget went on locations, sets and equipment. I read he filmed the entire thing on both film and digital, buying (not renting as is usually done) both cameras for full price. Back then cameras were a fortune, even more so than today. @@bushidoh8316
The making of footage that was cut is surely one of cinema's few holy grails.
It’s all I’m thinking about
What is incredible is how well equipped they were to get such a poor result. It's quite impossible to achieve.
Actually it shows that having professional crew and equipment are no guarantee at all for quality.
One of the greatest movie ever made
Also very enjoyable
Just not for the right reasons...
can't belive this amount of money went into the film
Our world is richer for it
3:46 Chris R is the best actor of the whole movie!
The only truly bad actors are Tommy and Steven lol
@@triple7marc and the dude who got his dick sucked
I am amazed that this movie actuaaly had a decent sized crew!
2:57 guy with ponytail. he knew lol
Everyone but Tommy knew.
Even lisa was kinda laughing 😅
It's especially interesting seeing this after seeing The Disaster Artist.
This is all so surreal to me
The guy who played Chris-R was so badass, they needed Zac Efron to play him in The Disaster Artist.
Wait did he really?!
@@lizzychrome7630 oh yeaaah
His name is not Chris it's Chris R., stick to the script, this real Hollywood movie.
Zac Efron was Chris R in the disaster artist
It makes it even more funny seeing how much work actually went into making this pile
How did he even get the money to fund these shootings?
@@ConanObrien22 he invested in commercial real estate from what I've read. the simplest answer is usually the correct one.
Its like scientists working on the first nuclear bomb.
I feel like I’m sitting on an atomic bomb waiting for it to go off.
17:30 You can hear Tommy say "That's what he said."