Commercial Mock Checkride
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
- Our goal was to make this as accurate as possible. We didn't cut out any important information or have the mock DPE answer any questions.
This is a full length mock Commercial checkride done as close to the real thing as possible. No side tracks or teaching moments. We hope this gives you a good idea of the length and scope of your checkride.
Grab the Commercial ACS and follow along
00:00 DPE Brief
01:39 B. Airworthiness
05:23 A. Pilot Qualifications
09:19 B. Airworthiness
16:07 C. Weather Information
42:20 D. Cross-Country Flight Planning
48:56 E. National Airspace System
54:14 F. Performance and Limitations
58:37 G. Operation of Systems
1:02:47 H. Human Factors
1:09:55 FARS
1:13:07 Medicals in the FARS - Розваги
The scenario proposed of the friend renting the aircraft and being the operator exercising operational control is actually okay to conduct. Here's some more information and where to find (some of) the regs covering this:
You can provide your pilot services, whether holding out or not (you are allowed to hold out for your "pilot services" only), if you are not the operator and the operator is not being paid to transport the property or passengers you are flying onboard the aircraft.
For this scenario, see 91.501(b)(4):
"Flights conducted by the operator of an airplane for his personal transportation, or the transportation of his guests when no charge, assessment, or fee is made for the transportation".
So long as the operator isn't being paid to have you fly these people, then you can legally perform the flight. There is another reg for this as well (dependent upon holding out or not, but if holding out for "pilot services" only, then you can conduct the flight), but this is one of them. However, the operator could've been paid without you the pilot knowing so that's another interesting twist.
For property, see when it's allowed via 91.501(b)(7):
"The carriage of property (other than mail) on an airplane operated by a person in the furtherance of a business or employment (other than transportation by air) when the carriage is within the scope of, and incidental to, that business or employment and no charge, assessment, or fee is made for the carriage other than those specified in paragraph (d) of this section;"
For this, you can carry such property and be paid to do so, so long as the operator (person who hired you and would be providing the aircraft) is doing so in furtherance of his/her business or employment.
So great video and very educational. However you may want to review the discussion on Pilot Qualifications and the scenario with the “passenger” renting the aircraft and hiring you the commercial pilot to fly him to Chicago. In my opinion it would be perfectly legal for the pilot to be paid to take the passenger to Chicago. The passenger has operational control but he is not holding out to the public to take persons to Chicago. It’s no different than if the passenger actually owned the aircraft and hired you to fly him. No operational certificate is required for that situation as well as the lease which is a dry lease.
I was thinking the same thing. Now I’m second guessing…
I have a checkride in a couple weeks.
Thanks for taking the time to write this and for phrasing it in a positive way! If it is a mistake it wouldn't be our first! We appreciate community feedback making us all more knowledgeable and safe pilots.
I just saw your comment now and we are going to take a look at it in depth and will plan to get an in depth response that brings clarity to all.
No flight school would allow that for insurance purposes. It's also called a sham dry lease... The flight school is holding out to the public by having their airplanes available for rent to people. The aircraft is being used to transfer a person or property from place to place for compensation. That's getting into common carriage rules. This would be a dry lease of which operational control was not transferred so thus either the flight school or the person renting the plane would need a part 135 certificate, or 121 if this was a scheduled thing. *edit just to add; investment companies that own transport large aircraft, do indeed rent (lease) out aircraft to airlines BUT operational control is legitimately transferred to the airline and the airline takes on operational control and operates under a part 121 cert. The airline provides the crew, fuel and MX for the aircraft. In your example, the flight school is renting out aircraft for compensation as a dry lease but is retaining operational control so thus not allowed normally.
The original poster is correct. Because the pilot does not have operational control or work for the FBO that dry leased the airplane it would be a legal for the pilot to be compensated for flying a person in that plane. Whether insurance is ok with that arrangement or not doesn’t affect the legality.
@@utah20gflyer76 I agree, the Lesee has operational control in a dry lease. So long as he/she is not holding out (inviting random people to fly and making them pay a portion of the flight costs).
I have my check ride at the end of the month. I’ve been diving into common and private carriage. And I think the scenario with your friend paying is perfectly OK to fly, your legal bro.
Got a comm CR here in a couple weeks, watching this video gave me so much more confidence in my ground knowledge.
Commercial checkride is scheduled for Monday! Thanks for creating these mock checkride videos. They are helpful!
How did it go?
Thanks for your involvement in this video everyone. Several helpful comments have been made regarding both the dry lease discussion and time of useful consciousness.
I have pinned a detailed response from a viewer on the issue of the dry lease who I believe has a correct understanding.
14 CFR 91.500 (subpart F) series is specifically written for large and turbine-powered multiengine airplanes and Fractional Ownership programs, which typically does not include flight school and personally owned planes. Despite this, we have done some research and now agree that such an operation is legal as long as the renter and pilot are not the same person.
The conclusion in our video is incorrect and will be updated. We apologize for any confusion and are encouraged to see people are still gaining knowledge and passing checkrides thanks to these videos.
Just passed my commercial checkride. This mock was very helpful. There were a couple of things asked of me that I remembered due to watching this video.
Thank you!
Glad it was helpful! Thanks for watching!
thank you both! i passed my PPL checkride with flying colors thanks to your video on it, and will likely be doing the same for my commercial with the help of this video. safe flying!
Thanks for the feedback! We enjoy making the videos and learning more ourselves. Check out our instrument checkride videos as well if you are thinking of getting an instrument rating. Fly safe!
just in timeee thank you!
This was awesome guys, I’m taking my discover flight next week and watching this is getting me pumped
Woohooo. Nice! I watched the PPL probably 6-7 times. Helped out a lot
We're glad it helped. Have you passed your private pilot checkride yet?
@@SafetyPilotOfficial yes. Passed it on the 20th!
Perfect timing so glad this video came up. Have my Comm checkride on the 13th thanks guys
Great job. Thanks! As we know there are many questions that can get asked but this mock checkride gives me a good idea on what to expect in general terms.
Really good video. My checkride was supposed to be today, but weather cancelled it. Glad I can review videos like these until I get the chance to take it
Sorry to hear it was cancelled. The wait is stressful. Good luck!
good work fellas
I’ve got my checkride tomorrow. It’s already been rescheduled twice so hoping I can finally get it done! Great video
Good Luck!
1:05:38 Look up figure 17-1 in the 8083-25c... TUC is like 30 minutes or more at 20k feet. 30k feet is 1-2 minutes. it's above 40k feet is when you start to get down into the seconds of useful consciousness.
Thanks for sharing this. We were looking for a basic understanding from the applicant as TUC depends heavily on many factors such as age, health, exercise, alcohol and smoking habits, as well as ascent rate. While a typical ascent rate may allow for upwards of 20 minutes without oxygen at 20,000ft a rapid decompression at 20,000ft certainly would not. Had the applicant thought he had as much as an hour there would be a problem. The point we were looking for is a pilot's understanding of the hazard of the situation and that they need to get down as soon as possible.
Thanks for sharing the table.
My commercial check ride tmr been watching this video and other ones in the past few weeks. Hopefully I pass 🎉
Did u pass?
@@laneallenfilms1039 yes I did pass it the first time! It’s really helpful and now working on my cfi ride
Just started commercial could not be better timing
Glad to hear! Good luck with your training.
I dont get why i would not be able to be hire if the renter with operation control operates under part 91 (corporate) then no AOC is required. Can someone explane pls?
Haw long does it take to get to Mars of the umbral check point
i swear these guys are the same guy
Ahhhhhh i watched your private and instrument rating mock checkride and i was waiting for this video to come but 😂😂 but i just took my commercial checkride Friday and i passed , I’m still going to watch this video thank you for what y’all do 💪🏽💪🏽🫡🫡🫡
Congrats!!
I’m about to do my Com. ride in about 2 weeks. Any suggestions?
@@nextlevel9344 honestly just know the acs , i didn’t have any weird or gotchu questions from the DPE everything was based of the acs
We are seeing double!
Prepare for trouble!
And make it double!
To protect the world from devastation!
To unite all peoples within our nation!
To denounce the evils of truth and love!
To extend our reach to the stars above!
Jessie!
James!
Team Rocket blasts off at the speed of light!
Surrender now, or prepare to fight!
DPE means Designated PILOT Examiners mate
5:30 I believe he is wrong about the Dry Lease. He is describing it as if he were a flight instructor being hired to fly an aircraft from his flight school. With a Dry Lease, the renter is allowed to find their own flight crew.
14 CFR Part 91 Subpart K & AC 91-84 - Fractional Ownership Programs
A dry-lease aircraft exchange means an arrangement, documented by the written program agreements, under which the program aircraft are available, on an as needed basis without crew, to each fractional owner.
I think you may be right
I also think he is wrong on that one. The person renting has operational control, but he is not making money on the flight. He is just renting it and paying you to fly it. You are just being hired to fly. Now if said renter was selling a seat to another passenger, that would be a no go as he would be leaning towards part 135
You are a correct, we made a mistake. Thanks for the diligent watching!
Confused about the your friend renting a plane no allowed thing. I thought if someone else provided the plane it was A ok?
You are correct. The instructor(s) in this video are human and make mistakes. It is allowed so long as the pilot being paid is not the operator and the operator (the friend in this scenario) is not being paid to transport persons or property.
Bulletbling is right on and very gracious in his reply. Thanks for watching and helping everyone get the correct information!
Starts at 1:40
It would be very helpful from a studying perspective to correct him when he’s wrong. I get that on the actual check ride that can’t happen, but it would make this video more informative
still loved it tho
The part about his friend renting the plane was hard to watch
I like this video because it better prepares me for my CFI mock exam. You know, the one where they wreck you for two or more hours straight just to tell you you're not ready and to come back to do it all over again in 3 weeks after you've forgotten all the information on the mock exam to finally sign me off to take my check ride with a DPE. So wish me luck, I have me 97th mock exam coming up in a few days 😂
Registration expires in 36 months and not 7 yrs
That's been amended, it's now 7 years.
@@jviation737Yep. Used to be 1 year for state (Michigan) and 3 years federal.
My only criticism is, please make it louder and the audio more clear. You guys are hard to hear.
Turn up your volume
👍
@@lucassmither4327 oh shit really? Just turn it up? My bad bro shoulda done that earlier
why do you look the same XD