Why isn't anybody bothered about breathing in quantum realm? They are smaller than the oxygen molecules in there Edit: for everyone commenting suit/helmet helps, I'm talking about how Janet stays in the quantam realm without any protective gear and when hank arrives, he's seen without the helmet as well
prajwal prakash probably cop-out with psuedo-science: They are smaller than oxygen molecules, meaning they are receiving more oxygen at their size than the oxygen in real-time.
Because this universe has aliens, gods, giant green monster men, sentient robots, nazi-ghosts, and wizards. But the oxygen is the thing you can't suspend your disbelief for?
@@ayjay579 yes, coz this one involves a human surviving there and breathing is one of our basics to survive. I'm letting all the other inconsistencies related to quantum realm slide
No podcast. An entire movie of just Luis explaining everything to none marvel fans so people get even more emotional when they start killing off characters
Missed sin: It was midday in Wakanda when Thanos snapped, fully ten hours ahead of San Francisco time. It should have been around dawn in the after credits scene.
Woozy.y it’s not exact. That was just his experience. Yea it’s inconsistent but that the entire reason they were able to do what they did in Endgame. Think about it, every 5 hours they spent fixing everything would have been 5 years in the OG timeline, but instead it was the other way around...they spent as much time as needed in the past but in the present only a few minutes had gone by. So no that doesn’t really apply to Janet’s age...but you are right...it doesn’t make since. But hey there are fucking wizards in this universe, what can you do.
The 5 year/5 hour thing wasn't just from being in the quantum realm. There was a throw-away line in the Ant-Man 2 end-credit scene about the risk of getting stuck in a time-vortex. Scott just happened to slip into one and survive, and that's what gave the Avengers the idea to try and control that possibility. Janet didn't travel in time.
They said that time works differently, not that years seem like hours. Scott got caught in the time vortexes Janet mentioned, and it sent him five years into the future. Janet did no such thing, as she obviously knew to avoid the vortexes due to spending three full decades down there. Scott traveled to the future the same way the Avengers traveled to the past.
They shrink by decreasing the distance between atoms without changing mass but all the time things act as if the mass was changed.This is the biggest sin in my oppinion
@@asgardninja9674 An increasing density would mean the lab-building should be sinking into the earth like a bullet. If its mass stays the same, and so does Earth's gravity, it should still weigh as much as a full building. Either way, Hank's technology is bull :)
@@LucianCanad no one thought about the basic laws of conservation of mass when they came out with this retarded idea. which is a shame because they kept putting the word quantum next to everything.
The battery just supports my theory that the building actually started out as a small toy model, where the battery charged the electricity, and is merely enlarged when needed, maybe because the mass of the Quantum tunnel thingy makes it unusable when small.
I think that's dumb, just enjoy the movie... But if it was a real obvious sin, then yeah it's good to point it out. It's called constructive criticism...
I've been doing it for ages. I keep it all to myself if we're watching something new, but it turns into a pretty fun group game with Company if you're re-watching something everyone has seen. I have legitimately thought about getting a ding sound effect for my phone.
The Main problems in these movies is the fact that in the first movie everything that shrinks down keeps its weight which means that a building weighs nothing or the movie ignores its own physics.
There’s not one lick of consistency with the magic tech in these films. Just assume Hank figured out a way to change the shrinking method so that you can pick and choose which mode you want...
@@samueltheprideofafrikarobi9319 I think Samosa Nathan was getting at the point that evolution is the result of a series of adaptations of a species to new environmental conditions - members with successful adaptations pass them onto future generations while members with failed adaptations are killed off before they can mate.
"Adaptation" is not the same as "evolution". "Adaptation" ususally is for a short term and not genetically involved, whereas "evolution" is in long term and has to be a change that can be passed on to the descendants, therefore genetics is involved.
@@locochoify Evolution, however, is a form of adaptation (of species, to environmental stress), thus the sentence still sounds kind of redundant. Now if she said that it's adaptation, and then expanded on this thought by saying it's a continuous adaptation resembling evolution, then it would make more sense. Also, a single organism is not subject to evolution, a collection called a species is.
rewester17 dude...your videos are shit..11 million subs yet you still come here trying to promote basically you be itching about things as well...one day someone will be the new you making a video about you as well and digging into your life and how you operate...Jesus...11million subs and you still can’t quit wanting attention huh? Lol welp...this is the end of my attention for ya. Good luck and quit hating or that shit will come back around
I have another sin for the post-credits scene. In the first Ant-Man movie, when Scott shrank into the Quantum Realm, he got out by using one of those enlargers. Why didn't he have any of them when he went in the Quantum Realm on PURPOSE. Even if they knew that they could take him out of the Quantum Realm, they definitely should've given him the enlargers as a backup if anything went wrong.
Imagine it being just before but keep in the post credit scene of hope, hank and janet being dusted.....that would have been a great way to introduce infinity war
@@Paulafan5 and then later in the video he complains about Wasp kicking ass, like dude weren't you the one complaining in the beginning of the video of not letting female superhero take the spotlight and now your role is reversed.
Every person doesn’t have a 50% chance, because this way more then half of humanity could be wiped out if alot of people are just unlucky, that way, if they are REALLY unlucky, the whole of humanity could be snapped away, so you have to look at it as a percentage of the entire human race, not just individually, just like sheckii told you but you told him every person has a 50% chance which isnt true
How? How does he "mindcontrol" animals, when all his technology is about quantum physics?? It's bullshit in the comics and it's never explicitely mentioned in the Ant Man movies because it's bullshit. The comic book writers who invented the character apparently went "His theme is 'ants', right? So, when he gets small he gets super-strong, like an ant, right, and he can, like, talk to ants, because reasons."
@@TF2CrunchyFrog You do recall the part where he invented the tech to control ants as well right? Hence the name Antman? It is built into his helmet or Hank's case a hearing aid looking device.
It's not a bad movie. It's not amazing, either. It's just very awkwardly placed in the mcu, due to it's pretty low stakes and being quite detatched from the overall mcu, after we've reached the high stakes of Infinity War into Engame. That said, I did like the ending scene with him stuck in the quantum realm, after the Thanos snap. That was a nice touch that took advantage of its awkward place in the mcu.
@@Five050 very well said, and thats what annoys me about it, Ant-Man and the Wasp had the potential to be so out there and a really unique sequel, and while it was an enjoyable couple of hours, it never reached its full potential, further proving the first one was even beginning to be memorable because of Edgar Wrights work on it
If their mass stayed the same, and their bodies density was increased when they shrink, then shrinking to the Quantum Realm would literally turn anyone or anything to a black hole.
Yeah, I was wondering about whether the mass condensation of going subatomic would be enough to create a black hole. I sense it wouldn't but would still be a fun problem to solve.
Vah0n1 Manuel-Scott Yes and No. They aren’t the same, A smaller version wouldn’t weigh the same as the building Mass and Weight are two different things Mass deals with the amount of matter and weight deals with the force of gravity on that object
@@drew9384 Which means that the building being shrunk to that scale would weigh exponentially more than the unshrunk building and punch a suitcase-sized hole through the ground. They said in the first movie that the mass of the object stays the same, just the space between the atoms is reduced, so compressing that much mass down to that small of an object would make it weigh thousands of times more. Hell, the mere speed of shrinking that much mass so quickly would have caused enough suction as the air rushed to fill that massive volume of suddenly-empty space to cause hurricane-force winds that would have knocked Scott and Hank on their faces and possibly even flipped the car on top of them, to say nothing of the sudden depressurization blowing out all of the windows of the nearby buildings.
Why are you all still using this logic when we saw a tank keychain last movie? It's obvious that Pym Particles don't keep the same mass since Scott is able to ride a fucking ant. Everybody keeps using the one line from last movie and not their own eyes.
Dargonhuman it’s not that it would weigh more, since both the mass and the force of gravity would remain unchanged, which are the two components in determining weight. However, the building WOULD punch a hole thru many, many layers of earth because the same mass would be focused over a smaller surface area.
I know it is Cinema Sins's job to hate on every single thing in existence.. But how can you hate on that "de-aging" technology. It's dope as hell! Knowing how old the actors are now just makes it cooler.
Yeah, honestly, I didn't even notice it watching the movie (and didn't find it uncanny even when it was being pointed out here). Maybe I just don't read enough tabloids that I have a perfect mental image of what Pfeiffer should look like.
I cant believe you didnt comment on how impossibly impractical the smaller cars are. I mean say a normal car is ten feet long and travels a mile it covers 520 car lengths in however long it takes but if a car is one inch long then it has to cover 63 k car lengths. So for a tiny car to travel at the same relative speeds as a larger car(as we are shown them doing several times in this movie) they would have to travel significantly faster,... relatively.like 120 times faster, So 45 mph is like what mach 7(5k mph 'ish)
45 mph is 45 mph. Rpm might be different, and car lengths traveled might be different, but 45 mph is 45 mph (Also, if a 10 foot car covers 1 mile, that is 528 car lengths, not 520)
@@christophermitchell7001 so are you saying if two objects are moving at the same speed, the larger one moves faster? Because that's what it seems like you're saying
@@incendiary6243 A car can rotate its wheels at a given RPM. That would be the same at both sizes. Lets say that the RPM of the car's wheels is 5. It rotates 5 times per minute. It would be significantly more than that, but this is my example. The distance the car can travel per rotation is important here. For a large car with a wheel of circumference of 1 metre, it can travel 5 metres in that minute. The shrunk car's wheel has a circumference significantly smaller, lets say, 1 cm. Therefore, the smaller car travels at 5cm per minute. Significantly slower. The factor that changes is size, and the only size that significantly effects a car's speed is the circumference of the tyre.
@@russellbloxwich693 rpm is irrelevant in speed. If 2 objects are traveling at the same translational velocity, they will reach the exact same distance in the exact same time. The smaller wheels will have a higher rotational velocity, but thats not relevant here
You missed one of the biggest sins! How in the world does Hank Pym carry the case of cars. In the first movie it was set up that an object keeps it's original weight just becomes more dense as the space between the atoms shrinks... there for one Tiny car should still weigh over 1000lbs and that's for a lighter car. The Van with all of the field equipment should be over a ton. Therefore this plastic case with 12 cars in it of varying makes models and sizes should weigh at least 6 tons all the way up to 24 tons... And that's conservative
Also they say Ghost gets in a state where she can't interact with matter, yet she clearly and conveniently always interact with the ground. That's a big issue, I'm surprised this one and yours weren't included in the video.
That's not what the first movie says, and obviously not what it does from looking at anything that happens in either movie. Hank carried a TANK on his keychain in that movie, obviously objects do not keep their mass. And the building??? The movie actually said objects maintain their "density," so you have to watch when tiny that you don't stab people with your fist. Also you're not going to get an actual explanation of what the Pym Particles do or how they work because Pym is so protective of the technology(also because it's utterly insane.)
@@trezapoioiuy ghost quantum tunnels through matter. that means she can phase through things like thin walls, but the floor is thick so she can't fall down. it also looked like she can control it to some extent.
@@rew1677 I saw you post this same link on 2 different unrelated comments (Here and one other) and the linked video had nothing to do with either comment. That is pretty much the definition of spam. I called you out on that other one as well and you replied there with the word "kool" which made no sense. I think the better course of action is to simply report you for spam and be done with it.
I work as an assistant teacher. At multiple schools over the years. Never has the lost and found area ever been in the principal's office. Even when I was a student it was never there either.
Mine was just a dusty, spider-infested, cob web covered rack outside in the hallway with some clothes and lunch pails containing 2 year old sandwiches lol
Heck, I spent 5 years in the US and the school I went to just had a bookcase in the lunch room stocked with things people left behind, that's actually how I got this phone, and a new bag cuz my old one tore open one day.
Wearing a helmet won't keep your brain from moving around in your skull should you hit your head hard enough. That being said Scott did give her some protection
4:50 excellent point brought up about using super hero tech/abilities to improve the world. You could grow food to feed impoverished countries, Wolverine or Deadpool could have their healing factor studied to cure cancer, tony stark could create an arc reactor(s) to power the world without fossil fuels or nuclear waste, and don’t get me started on what dr strange could do to help the planet…but nah, let’s not focus on any of that type of stuff…
The Oatmeal Scene was a HIGH POINT! One of the biggest issues I had with the sequel was the reduction of screen time (and especially lines) for Pena, T.I. and Dastmalchion. Also the Truth Serum Scene! These were important for the humor/action balance. I admit that the truth serum scene sounds like it was snatched directly from Deadpool.
I’m not actually bothered by the convenience of who gets dusted and who doesn’t. It can be explained pretty well if you say that Dr. Strange did what he did so that certain people would survive and certain people would be dusted.
The Elemental Penguin first of all, it wasn’t a question lol Second, I respectfully disagree. Although Thanos threatened to kill a lot of loved ones for the stones, and a lot did give him what he wanted to save them, there were still people willing to let their loved ones die to stop Thanos. Star Lord was ready, and prepared, to sacrifice Gamora. Scarlet Witch killed Vision to stop Thanos from getting the Soul Stone. Doctor Strange does not strike me as a person who would give up anything that important for anyone. He is very smart and he isn’t particularly attached to Tony or Peter. He literally tells this to Tony when Tony saves him-“when it comes down to saving you, or the Time Stone, or the kid? I’m going to choose the Time Stone.” Doctor Strange was completely prepared to sacrifice Tony, Peter Parker, and anyone else to protect the Time Stone from Thanos. But when he looked into the future, and saw the one instance where they won, he saw Tony somehow being instrumental in defeating Thanos. So he chose Tony over the Time Stone, so that he could make reality the one future where the Avengers won.
I like to believe that when Doctor Strange saw 14,000,605 scenarios, in 14,000,604 of them, Star Lord ruins everything; but in the one scenario where things turn out okay, he only MOSTLY ruins everything.
Also that, as stated from the beginning of the first movie, the technology reduces the space between particles that make up atoms. So you could never be smaller than the sum of all the particles that make up your body. Also, the closer the particles become, the more likely they would collide and release huge amounts of energy, probably setting off a chain reaction with all of the atoms in your body, causing you to explode like an atomic bomb. Also the whole inconsistency of weight changes depending on whether or not it's relevant to that part of the movie.
Janet shrank small enough to fit between the molecules of the metal casing. You can’t both be small enough to fit between the molecules of the metal casing and large enough to do damage to the circuitry. Lest we forget, she continues to shrink with perpetually diminishing returns on her destructive potential. To even consider shrinking as a potential option suggests that Janet was suffering from too many blows to her head and was judgment impaired. That’s gotta be worth a Cinema Sin for the counter.
Let’s not forget they were first on top of a intermediate range missile, that used rockets instead of air-breathing engines. So, they would be fighting winds in the 600-1800mph range. (10x that if it was a ICBM, with a terminal velocity near Mach 25, not Mach 1-3) If she really popped up and had the belt suddenly take all her weight, she would have easily been ripped in half. Not to mention you arms and legs being folded behind you.
They're kind of inconsistent about it but shrinking objects are supposed to retain their original mass. So at subatomic levels Janet would have the same powerful punch as a full sized human. At that size that amount of power to an atom could easily lead to the entire structure destabailizing.
@@BadWolf739 Except she wouldn't be able to see because photons would be larger than her head and not able to enter her eye without killing her instantly. Also, the Schwarzfield radius would apply if she retained the same mass and she'd be inside her own personal miniature black hole with no way of seeing anything at all, ever.
@@stylis666 Yes and Ironman's reactor shouldn't work and there's no serum that would give you superstrength while also turning your head into a red skull. This is comic book logic we are talking about. From a scientific perspective shrinking works one of two ways neither of which would be viable as both would kill a human. I do wish Antman had made a little more effort to establish a zone of "this works this way, it's ridiculous but accept it like this and everything else falls into place" instead of what they did which was have shrinking tech act however was convenient in whatever way they needed but if you're going to start targeting the realism of comic book movies you're going to very quickly realise that they aren't realistic in the slightest. It just comes down to what level of suspension of disbelief they can narratively justify before they lose the viewer.
5:45 Jeremy, that's the whole fucking point of this movie. They don't know Thanos is coming. The whole point was to show what they were doing during infinity war. If you saw the fucking post credits scene, you'd see Pym died and Scott got stuck. Come on, Jeremy. It's like you don't even watch the movies you're sinning.
Cs: gets mad at movie bc they won’t help people with the super advanced technology they have. Also CS: gets mad at Scott when he created a giant laptop that provides entertainment for at least 20 people
You're missing something big: In the first movie they stated that when something shrinks, it contains the same weight (the density changing), which is why when Scott shrinks in the bathroom, he dents the floor when he lands. However, in this one, they shrink that full-sized building, and then just pull it around like a light piece of luggage. It should still weigh the same as a building, and be near impossible to move. Not to mention, reducing that much weight into that small size would make it so dense it'd easily dent, if not fall through, the ground. I'm not blaming Marvel for this, I'm blaming you for not mentioning it.
Hank is capable of carrying a shrunken tank in the first movie, and Antony is capable of carrying a shrunken Scott, so that error existed in the previous movies. I don't remember if that was sinned in the Cinema Sins video for the first movie, but maybe it was, and Cinema Sins didn't feel like being redundant?
In the same vein of logic, expanding objects like the toy train in the first one, the ants in both or the candy dispenser in this one wouldn't make them heavier like the movies suggest. In fact, for some of the enlarged objects, their buoyancy would likely make them lighter than air so they'd float away.
I’ve always wondered why Ghost’s feet don’t faze. She said that they turned her into a weapon without thinking that one day she’ll fall to the earth’s core.
She mentioned that her body changed and called it "evolution" she might have got the x Gene and became a mutant she died before giving us more info . KEVIN FAIGEEEEE
@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 I said potentially, as the buildings and cars they shrink throughout the movie all have special devices built in, but this one doesn't so we don't know what would happen.
@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 in open space, there is so little gravity that comparing it to no gravity would result in 0 differences. It's so similar to no gravity that it basically is 0 G. So hes not incorrect. And there is air in space. Clouds of hydrogen and oxygen are all over. It's not breathable though.
Those aren't the same things. Evolution is adaptation over generations, done by species and not individuals. She couldn't have evolved within her own lifetime, that would just be a mutation.
Yeah, adaptation is how an individual adapts to their environment, evolution is changes in genetic frequencies in a given population over time due to environmental pressures.
What, no "it's free real estate" outtake during the boat scene? That was a perfect opportunity to use that, considering that the actor from it is in that scene
@@the-trustees If you enlarged food, according to the movie, you would just be increasing the space of the atoms, so all the food molecules would be the same. We as humans get energy from eating food when our body breaks apart the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen bonds in food. There would still be the same amount of bonds if you were to enlarge a carrot, so a gigantic carrot would have the same number of calories as a smaller carrot, therefore giving you the same amount of energy. Giving someone enlarged food wouldn't do anything except for probably make it take longer for them to eat it.
Now that you’re completely caught up with the MCU (and Captain Marvel won’t be on Blu-Ray until June), can you please sin The Avengers (1998) when Endgame comes out?
@@appleappington7346 That particular Avengers movie are not even superhero related. It is British movie. And this movie is the reason why real Avengers movie was called Marvel's The Avengers in United Kingdom.
preciousinfinity Do the snap included plants is it 50% of all life or 50% of all species if it the former there is a possibility that an entire species be extinct and another being virtually unfazed
While true, every scene we see where people get dusted has resulted in over 50% of the main characters getting dusted. Hell, it was supposed to be 50% of each planet, but he took out almost everyone on his home planet.
He's not sinning the possibility of it (he even acknowledged it was possible), he's sinning the coincidence of it being purely plot-convenient as opposed to feeling truly random like it wants you to believe it is.
In defense of Pym not using this technology for the benefit of all, the opening of the first Ant-Man established that Pym did try to present his tech for the benefit of all, only to have Howard Stark steal it and try to make weapons out of it. After that, Pym determined that the danger of it becoming a weapon was too great to offset the benefits to humanity.
Honestly I agree with the whole “why are Hank and Hope criminals too” thing because imagine if someone stole a computer from Apple and then used it to commit a crime that’s like saying Apple is also to blame, it doesn’t make any sense
Another sin to be added: Scott and Hank´s family decide to experiment, while at the same time, Thanos´army is attacking the earth. At least they should know about the first attack on New York led by Squidward (it was on the news), but in the postcredit scene of this movie, it looks like they are pretty careless about that. (this was acknowledged by HISHE)
I think that because all of this stuff was happening at the exact same time as Infinity War, they had obviously too many distractions to pay attention to what the bigger picture was.
You have to remember what happened the last time Scott jumped into an Avengers battle without being asked; he was arrested and put on house arrest for 2 years for violating the Sakovia Accords. For all we know they were doing those experiments as part of some project to stop Thanos and were told to finish them before joining the fight.
@@Dargonhuman They specifically said they went in there to get to help stabilize Ghost. No mentions about the attack on NY that happened at least two days earlier.
@@Gozokukolat How could it be two days earlier? Attack on NY and Thanos' Decimation happened the same day. They were in San Francisco. They were busy dealing with their own problems. I'm sure they didn't have any time to watch views.
@@kacpernowak1535 (sorry for the tardy) I may have hyperbolized a bit much. It actually takes around 21 hours. Bruce calls Cap around 1:42pm New York Time (10:42am San Fran Time) according to the phone. Then 'The Snappening' occurs close to 10:24am NYT (7:24am SFT) according to Furry's GPS and that it's day time in NY. So 21 hours 18 minutes, more than a day if realistic travel restrictions are placed on the heroes but it's a super hero movie so... not so much. This still leaves a full news cycle for the Pym crew to have learned about NY.
Why isn't anybody bothered about breathing in quantum realm? They are smaller than the oxygen molecules in there
Edit: for everyone commenting suit/helmet helps, I'm talking about how Janet stays in the quantam realm without any protective gear and when hank arrives, he's seen without the helmet as well
Yadda Yadda
prajwal prakash probably cop-out with psuedo-science: They are smaller than oxygen molecules, meaning they are receiving more oxygen at their size than the oxygen in real-time.
Because this universe has aliens, gods, giant green monster men, sentient robots, nazi-ghosts, and wizards. But the oxygen is the thing you can't suspend your disbelief for?
@@ayjay579 yes, coz this one involves a human surviving there and breathing is one of our basics to survive.
I'm letting all the other inconsistencies related to quantum realm slide
@@prajwalprakash003 and we let that one slide. Willing suspension of disbelief is different for everyone
I want a 100 hour podcast where the entire MCU is explained at Luis' pace
The entire mcu isnt 100 hours tho homie
Justus Voss it would be with Luis
No podcast. An entire movie of just Luis explaining everything to none marvel fans so people get even more emotional when they start killing off characters
I want a scene where Luis meets Ned and drax
Justus Voss you clearly know nothing about luis’ storytelling
I'm surprised it was just a regular Duracell and not a Duracell Quantum.
Duuuude! You gotta warn a person before you go blowing their minds like that!
Didn't know about such product. If it was a thing when this movie was in works, that's one hell of a missed opportunity.
@@selforganisation Duracell Quantum is one of those "deluxe" high capacity batteries and has been around since the early 2000's.
@@DargonhumanI guess they didn't sell these or at least advertise them in Europe.
Jordan Herkowski Plus the Duracell powering the place totally breaks the law of conservation of energy
Disappointed you didnt do a "Quantum Bonus Round"
Yea but if you quantum quantum'd a quantum quantum just about quantum, you'd be quantum.
I was also thinking of a bonus round every time someone said "The lab"
Why say quantum all the fucken time
@@alexreilly6121 Godzilla had a stroke reading this and fucking died
Missed sin: It was midday in Wakanda when Thanos snapped, fully ten hours ahead of San Francisco time. It should have been around dawn in the after credits scene.
Thanos accounted for that. Like how TV shows air later in California than they do in New York.
+SilentBudgie
That Time Stone really is one hell of a magic gem.
Fuujinryu that’s just too nerdy 😂 I never even thought about the fact that the whole movie took place in daytime.
Unless the snap isn't instantaneous everywhere but spreads out like a wave from Wakanda into the rest of the world/universe.
@@SilentBudgie this is literally the best comment I have read in years.
"God forbid a woman be an inventor of marvel tech."
So you slept through Black Panther too, huh?
I'm pretty sure he said something like magic nano machines that do everything don't count.
HotaruZoku he specifically said SHEILD tech.
@@tovahnvitols7614 ......are you high? The TEXT CRAWL isn't a full 60 seconds in says otherwise.
it just sounds like he's an sjw
@@odd-jobsmatt7965 Sometimes, I wonder
Thanks for the help anti-gas lighting me.
“Sins Ulysses S grANT without a word” 😂
idk why but I wanted a sin off for Lang's daughter because she was adorable and a good kid overall
💯 like
Chris Allie uhhh isn’t she like 16
Chris Allie actually no she is 15 bruh u finna catch a case
John Hoquist she’s 18 u idiot
John Hoquist and speak English
Missed opportunity for a bonus round for every time they said "quantum".
It’d take too long
Missed opportunity to make something resembling a good video
@@ShakingHandsMedia missed opportunity to simply not watch the video.
@@ShakingHandsMedia If you mean the creators of Ant Man And The Wasp, then I agree.
10:19
Please God, Please let Avengers:Endgame start with a Luis-style recap of the entire MCU, to bring everyone up to speed for Infinity War Part 2.
The movie shouldn't have that but, Marvel should upload something like that one their channel.
Yep that would be awesome
I never knew I needed this but now I know that I will never anything more.
So you are not sinning Stan Lee cameos anymore? Good. Respect the man.
They're still sin-able
@@TheExecutioner21 no
XOVO lmao it’s a joke guys calm itn
is the supposed to be non-ironic
I think Jeremy will even go to remove a sin for Stan's cameo in Spider-Verse.
"It always fits... eventually."
And that cameo is an awesome one.
9:43 uhhh but if what Scott said in Endgame (5 years here = 5 hours in quantum realm) then wouldn't it technically be 30 hours for her?
Woozy.y it’s not exact. That was just his experience. Yea it’s inconsistent but that the entire reason they were able to do what they did in Endgame. Think about it, every 5 hours they spent fixing everything would have been 5 years in the OG timeline, but instead it was the other way around...they spent as much time as needed in the past but in the present only a few minutes had gone by. So no that doesn’t really apply to Janet’s age...but you are right...it doesn’t make since. But hey there are fucking wizards in this universe, what can you do.
The 5 year/5 hour thing wasn't just from being in the quantum realm. There was a throw-away line in the Ant-Man 2 end-credit scene about the risk of getting stuck in a time-vortex. Scott just happened to slip into one and survive, and that's what gave the Avengers the idea to try and control that possibility. Janet didn't travel in time.
To be fair to Jeremy, no-one knew that yet. Also Michelle Pfeiffer still aged in the quantum realm, which is brought up in the EWW Endgame video.
They just say time works differently in the quantum realm. There is no 5 years = 5 hours rule, that was just random.
They said that time works differently, not that years seem like hours. Scott got caught in the time vortexes Janet mentioned, and it sent him five years into the future. Janet did no such thing, as she obviously knew to avoid the vortexes due to spending three full decades down there. Scott traveled to the future the same way the Avengers traveled to the past.
They shrink by decreasing the distance between atoms without changing mass but all the time things act as if the mass was changed.This is the biggest sin in my oppinion
Decreasing the space between atoms: how to blow up things. The 'science' in this movie is 'stupid science'.
@@emsnewssupkis6453 i know the science doesnt make sence but it was the fact that they said it like it should that annoys me
All of the movie is 'magic' and not any attempt at 'science'. The childish nature of modern movies is astonishing.
Who cares the story and the comedy was shit
@@emsnewssupkis6453 "The childish nature of modern movies is astonishing" how old are you, 14?
Who comes to picnics but is never invited?
*Ants*
_Don't bug out it's just a bad joke_
I was gonna say your mother., 😏
r/PunPatrol! You're under arrest!
Bug you
Your joke was bad,
& you should feel bad for saying it
Kentrc11 woooosh
You do NOT badmouth Luis' wild story recaps!
@Lythrana Duskryn he aint as awesome a story teller as Luis. That's why he's jealous
Yeah nobody Badmouths Luis’ story recaps!
Exactly DO NOT DISRESPECT LUIS' STORYTELLING SKILLS
Wait for cinema wins. They typically note the good and bad of different scenes
I love his way of explaining shit because it's like a story
Luis is the greatest thing about this movie, how dare you make a sin for him.
Lord Pyralis he and his coworkers are the worst thing in this movie, and probably in the whole mcu
Leonardo 1 *best
he took off a sin for him
@@jeffwei Wait, how are you verified with 16 subscribers?
You didn’t finish the video, did you?
We need Luis to recap the journey to Endgame. Actually I'd listen to Luis recap pretty much anything.
YES!
U are sooooo right
And, so I asked, did Scott W ask Joshua West to ask jazzy jazzy to ask me, because he thinks I know Michael Pena in real life? And he said.....Yes!
That's about right.⬆
I would watch Luis narrate all the MCU movies starting with Iron Man.
Does shrinking make objects lighter or do they remain same weight?
Yes
Their mass stays the same, their density increases so weight is the same? More?
@@asgardninja9674 An increasing density would mean the lab-building should be sinking into the earth like a bullet. If its mass stays the same, and so does Earth's gravity, it should still weigh as much as a full building.
Either way, Hank's technology is bull :)
@@LucianCanad Yet he found a way to make the mass seperate from each other while in a small object .
Their mass is supposed to stay the same yet Ant-Man sits on ants without destroying them.
@@LucianCanad no one thought about the basic laws of conservation of mass when they came out with this retarded idea. which is a shame because they kept putting the word quantum next to everything.
Until you pointed out the GIANT Duracell Battery, I never noticed it before...
The battery just supports my theory that the building actually started out as a small toy model, where the battery charged the electricity, and is merely enlarged when needed, maybe because the mass of the Quantum tunnel thingy makes it unusable when small.
Same 😂
LOL CINEMA SINS has now trained me for every time I watch a movie, I start to point out the things he will sins when he makes the video on it!
I think that's dumb, just enjoy the movie...
But if it was a real obvious sin, then yeah it's good to point it out. It's called constructive criticism...
Same.. its fkn annoying cant enjoy a movie anymore
I have that too, every time I hear " come look at this", cliche it goes ding in my head.
I never watched movies like that... But now that I've read your comment things won't be same ever again
I've been doing it for ages. I keep it all to myself if we're watching something new, but it turns into a pretty fun group game with Company if you're re-watching something everyone has seen. I have legitimately thought about getting a ding sound effect for my phone.
Okay so no sin for the fact the movie playing from the laptop is NOT EVEN FULL SCREEN???? FULL SCREEN YOUR VIDEOS DAMMIT
And it was bugging me that they didn't angle it down towards the cars, how annoying would it be to have your theater screen tilted up like that??
I don't usually watch videos in fullscreen because it gives me headaches for some reason.
It's part of the reason I don't go to cinemas.
ElFlechero It’s “bugging” you, huh?
This movie should’ve been called “The Wasp (featuring Ant-Man)”.
Rude One facts
MegaSoulHero 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You’d be excellent at CinemaSins 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Or “West Coast Avengers.”
Sjw
Why don't any of the ANTagonists carry bug spray? It just kinda seems like common sense.
Exactly, it's common sense.
Because if they do they'll have to use the money for their shark repellant budget
Mr X you gon give it to em?
Good idea dude, it's cheap, easy to get & definitely effective.
@@Carlisho With the non-stop pop pop and stainless steel.
The Main problems in these movies is the fact that in the first movie everything that shrinks down keeps its weight which means that a building weighs nothing or the movie ignores its own physics.
Old comment but I just had a thought: Perhaps Pym built the building and its contents on the small scale then blew it up.
@@TheDarkFable Nice idea, but then wouldnt the building blow away when it is big?
@@Elleaf1 Some sort of anchoring perhaps?
There’s not one lick of consistency with the magic tech in these films. Just assume Hank figured out a way to change the shrinking method so that you can pick and choose which mode you want...
It's totally plot dependent. The same scene will have a shrunken character cracking the floor and then being light as a feather as needed.
“Adaptation is part of it, but some of it is... evolution”
Hold on a minute...
Hay, evolution is plausible. Haven't you ever seen the X-Me.................ooooohhhhh.
@@samueltheprideofafrikarobi9319 I think Samosa Nathan was getting at the point that evolution is the result of a series of adaptations of a species to new environmental conditions - members with successful adaptations pass them onto future generations while members with failed adaptations are killed off before they can mate.
Dargonhuman yup. "Adaptation is part of it, but some of it is... adaptation" hmm
"Adaptation" is not the same as "evolution".
"Adaptation" ususally is for a short term and not genetically involved, whereas "evolution" is in long term and has to be a change that can be passed on to the descendants, therefore genetics is involved.
@@locochoify Evolution, however, is a form of adaptation (of species, to environmental stress), thus the sentence still sounds kind of redundant. Now if she said that it's adaptation, and then expanded on this thought by saying it's a continuous adaptation resembling evolution, then it would make more sense.
Also, a single organism is not subject to evolution, a collection called a species is.
you got to give it to scott though, he is the only experienced magician who survived thanos's snap
2:03 i didn't know Jim Halpert was in this movie!
Hey, hats off to you for not seeing race!
Identity theft is not a joke, Jim!
I understood that reference
Liam Gordon “You’re Not Jim!”
@@Theo-ju4op and I understood that one
I love how the “hope can say she’s had sex with her mom” sin was sin 69.
all part of the plan brother
Oooohhh!!! Extra creepy sauce!!!!
technicly its also mean in a ways that hank fucked his son in law ( god please tell me they mary in the mcu or ant man 3
No sin removed for Paul Rudd's performance when Scott was possessed by Hope's mom and no sin removed for the tardigrade scene. Smh.
I love Paul Rudd, but holy shit was that scene bad and … odd.
both of those were so cringe
Saul Goodman It definitely was cringy and had me feeling very weird, but you have to admit his acting was on point there.
And the scene with his daughter.
I love how everyone is criticizing the movie ONLY to tell unfunny bug puns
MyName is Jeff yea it’s like they are just quoting a joke anthology...wait
ua-cam.com/video/iB7C7o920zE/v-deo.html
MyName is Jeff lol nope we criticize it for more than bug puns. Also ppl like me like the move just as much as the sins lol
rewester17 dude...your videos are shit..11 million subs yet you still come here trying to promote basically you be itching about things as well...one day someone will be the new you making a video about you as well and digging into your life and how you operate...Jesus...11million subs and you still can’t quit wanting attention huh? Lol welp...this is the end of my attention for ya. Good luck and quit hating or that shit will come back around
yea it's really BUGGIN me
"Ant-Manning the Wasp"? That sounds vaguely sexual.
Well, he HAS done that in the comics before.
🧜♀️🧜♀️ *WAN9T ME? LO8OK, I MASTB*ATE NAK1ED,снеск2 снann5el* 🔞
The beginning of the end for MCU. They went full feminist on this
I have another sin for the post-credits scene. In the first Ant-Man movie, when Scott shrank into the Quantum Realm, he got out by using one of those enlargers. Why didn't he have any of them when he went in the Quantum Realm on PURPOSE. Even if they knew that they could take him out of the Quantum Realm, they definitely should've given him the enlargers as a backup if anything went wrong.
NO Sin added for the completely inaccurate portrayal of San Francisco having zero visible homeless on the streets...even Venom got that right!
Also zero visible piles of feces on the streets.
Really? Why san franc is so bad? Bhutan has no homeless ppl, they get houses for free.
Damn i didn’t know this was a documentary about SF
I feel sorry for this movie, imagine being the first marvel movie after infinity war.
Imagine it being just before but keep in the post credit scene of hope, hank and janet being dusted.....that would have been a great way to introduce infinity war
@@JCash493 How?? They'd just be spoiling the ending of their biggest and (arguably) best film by showing the snap in action.
I liked it more then infinity war...it had more heart and characters i actually liked...
@@davidneiman7393 We all knew that at the end once the trailer came out
I loved this movie! Imagine having your first movie after infinity war came out. People would freak!
“God forbid a woman be the inventor of scores of useful Marvel tech”
So Shuri just doesn’t exist, I guess
Nope. Stop pointing out flaws in his male feminist rant. Also, the Korean scientist that helped Ultron make the Vision...
He’s talking about as a lead character. Everyone he listed has their own movie
Julie Newmar invented pantyhose...
Y'all, thats the fucking joke
@@Paulafan5 and then later in the video he complains about Wasp kicking ass, like dude weren't you the one complaining in the beginning of the video of not letting female superhero take the spotlight and now your role is reversed.
Hank: “when you were down there we think you may have ENTANGLED with her”
Will Smith: *holds back tears* i feel for you
Hey, a 12.5% chance of 3 people getting snapped away isn't that small...
u wot mate
@@felemiah Every person has a 50 percent chance... If you have 3 people, multiply .5 by .5 by .5, which equals .125 or 12.5%...
@@felemiah Unless of course you are a guardian, then you were pretty much dead...
@@mschuhler I question your math skills...
Every person doesn’t have a 50% chance, because this way more then half of humanity could be wiped out if alot of people are just unlucky, that way, if they are REALLY unlucky, the whole of humanity could be snapped away, so you have to look at it as a percentage of the entire human race, not just individually, just like sheckii told you but you told him every person has a 50% chance which isnt true
>forgetting that the ants are literally mind controlled by Hank
DING
Then why does he give them verbal instructions?
@@atomicmrpelly Alright, you have a point there I admit.
@@atomicmrpelly He's thinking out loud. Brilliant people are known to talk to themselves - hell, dumb people do it, too.
How? How does he "mindcontrol" animals, when all his technology is about quantum physics?? It's bullshit in the comics and it's never explicitely mentioned in the Ant Man movies because it's bullshit. The comic book writers who invented the character apparently went "His theme is 'ants', right? So, when he gets small he gets super-strong, like an ant, right, and he can, like, talk to ants, because reasons."
@@TF2CrunchyFrog You do recall the part where he invented the tech to control ants as well right? Hence the name Antman? It is built into his helmet or Hank's case a hearing aid looking device.
1:54 That's why she's wearing a helmet.
Apparently it does her make up too
Furious Sherman yes, because that helmet would save her if she flew off the damn thing
@@sensitive_salamander1091 They weren't going very fast, and it definitely wouldn't end up as bad as if she didn't have it on.
XD for some reason I read this in Scott’s voice
@@sensitive_salamander1091 a bicycle goes faster than that
"Nothing pass time like TV and porn!" CinemaSins March 5 2019
About a year ahead of their time.
"Do you have all your evil black SUVs equipped? Good! That's half the battle" 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Such a movie troop
Get to tailgating while driving fast!
I don't know many people who hate this movie
But I also don't know many people that even talk about this movie in the first place
i actually like this movie better than the first. The thanos part yeah but everything else was well done
Because the movie is forgettable ,it has no substance and like every other MCU film it's a comedy show.
It's the weakest super hero movie of last year. Doesn't mean it's bad or anything, but it's definately not memorable imo.
It's not a bad movie. It's not amazing, either. It's just very awkwardly placed in the mcu, due to it's pretty low stakes and being quite detatched from the overall mcu, after we've reached the high stakes of Infinity War into Engame. That said, I did like the ending scene with him stuck in the quantum realm, after the Thanos snap. That was a nice touch that took advantage of its awkward place in the mcu.
@@Five050 very well said, and thats what annoys me about it, Ant-Man and the Wasp had the potential to be so out there and a really unique sequel, and while it was an enjoyable couple of hours, it never reached its full potential, further proving the first one was even beginning to be memorable because of Edgar Wrights work on it
are we ever gonna get an everything wrong with Into The Spider-Verse?
_follow-up question: has a movie ever gotten negative sins before?_
Considering they gave even Wall E some sins and that's one of Jeremy's favorite movies, I don't think so.
Yeah there was it was troll one or two (though it was a April fools episode
Wall E went to -5 sins, but it didn't last long.
The creed - Troll 2 didn’t end at negative sins though. It ended going up to zero.
Hateful Eight had -1 sins at the beginning
If their mass stayed the same, and their bodies density was increased when they shrink, then shrinking to the Quantum Realm would literally turn anyone or anything to a black hole.
Henry that would require a lot more mass in a much smaller amount of space(and several other factors)
You thought of what I know
U are a black hole 🕳
Shhhhhh
@@chrisallie2224 Black holes are Tight!
I'm sorry but mass and size are not the same things, if a building was shrunk to the size of a suitcase, it would still weigh the same as the building
Yeah, I was wondering about whether the mass condensation of going subatomic would be enough to create a black hole. I sense it wouldn't but would still be a fun problem to solve.
Vah0n1 Manuel-Scott Yes and No. They aren’t the same, A smaller version wouldn’t weigh the same as the building Mass and Weight are two different things Mass deals with the amount of matter and weight deals with the force of gravity on that object
@@drew9384 Which means that the building being shrunk to that scale would weigh exponentially more than the unshrunk building and punch a suitcase-sized hole through the ground. They said in the first movie that the mass of the object stays the same, just the space between the atoms is reduced, so compressing that much mass down to that small of an object would make it weigh thousands of times more. Hell, the mere speed of shrinking that much mass so quickly would have caused enough suction as the air rushed to fill that massive volume of suddenly-empty space to cause hurricane-force winds that would have knocked Scott and Hank on their faces and possibly even flipped the car on top of them, to say nothing of the sudden depressurization blowing out all of the windows of the nearby buildings.
Why are you all still using this logic when we saw a tank keychain last movie? It's obvious that Pym Particles don't keep the same mass since Scott is able to ride a fucking ant. Everybody keeps using the one line from last movie and not their own eyes.
Dargonhuman it’s not that it would weigh more, since both the mass and the force of gravity would remain unchanged, which are the two components in determining weight. However, the building WOULD punch a hole thru many, many layers of earth because the same mass would be focused over a smaller surface area.
Most important sin: The word *QUANTUM*
Q U A N T I U M
Bonus round: uses of the word Quantum in this movie! **DING**
I know it is Cinema Sins's job to hate on every single thing in existence.. But how can you hate on that "de-aging" technology. It's dope as hell! Knowing how old the actors are now just makes it cooler.
If it worked well, maybe. What was shown here was not even uncanny valley material - it was more "bad '90s animation" level bad... :/
@@entropyzero5588 oh c'mon.. it was nowhere near that bad. You're worse than Cinema sins 😜
Yeah, honestly, I didn't even notice it watching the movie (and didn't find it uncanny even when it was being pointed out here). Maybe I just don't read enough tabloids that I have a perfect mental image of what Pfeiffer should look like.
Agreed. I'm blown away how flawless it looks.
I think it looks shit.
"Do you guys just put the word quantum in front of everything?" Yes. Yes they do. 😂
Everybody’s talking about Ant-Man, but what about Man-Ant: the human size ant?
"Dang, that's one messed-up lookin' dog!" - the police officer from "Ant-Man"
How to properly clean your metal computer see now are we talking about a Kevin Hart size any or a Dwayne Johnson size ant
@@theoneonly8472 a thor bjornson sized ant
MANT!
@@SteveSmith-wk9dx MATINEE! John Goodman ripped that! Also The Professor in the movie-in-the-movie.
I cant believe you didnt comment on how impossibly impractical the smaller cars are. I mean say a normal car is ten feet long and travels a mile it covers 520 car lengths in however long it takes but if a car is one inch long then it has to cover 63 k car lengths. So for a tiny car to travel at the same relative speeds as a larger car(as we are shown them doing several times in this movie) they would have to travel significantly faster,... relatively.like 120 times faster, So 45 mph is like what mach 7(5k mph 'ish)
45 mph is 45 mph. Rpm might be different, and car lengths traveled might be different, but 45 mph is 45 mph
(Also, if a 10 foot car covers 1 mile, that is 528 car lengths, not 520)
Dogerus, ,...just go see how RC cars and planes scale their speeds.
@@christophermitchell7001 so are you saying if two objects are moving at the same speed, the larger one moves faster? Because that's what it seems like you're saying
@@incendiary6243 A car can rotate its wheels at a given RPM. That would be the same at both sizes. Lets say that the RPM of the car's wheels is 5. It rotates 5 times per minute. It would be significantly more than that, but this is my example.
The distance the car can travel per rotation is important here. For a large car with a wheel of circumference of 1 metre, it can travel 5 metres in that minute. The shrunk car's wheel has a circumference significantly smaller, lets say, 1 cm. Therefore, the smaller car travels at 5cm per minute.
Significantly slower. The factor that changes is size, and the only size that significantly effects a car's speed is the circumference of the tyre.
@@russellbloxwich693 rpm is irrelevant in speed. If 2 objects are traveling at the same translational velocity, they will reach the exact same distance in the exact same time. The smaller wheels will have a higher rotational velocity, but thats not relevant here
You missed one of the biggest sins! How in the world does Hank Pym carry the case of cars. In the first movie it was set up that an object keeps it's original weight just becomes more dense as the space between the atoms shrinks... there for one Tiny car should still weigh over 1000lbs and that's for a lighter car. The Van with all of the field equipment should be over a ton. Therefore this plastic case with 12 cars in it of varying makes models and sizes should weigh at least 6 tons all the way up to 24 tons... And that's conservative
Also they say Ghost gets in a state where she can't interact with matter, yet she clearly and conveniently always interact with the ground. That's a big issue, I'm surprised this one and yours weren't included in the video.
Jason Jones it was also set up in the first movie that hank can carry a tank as a key chain.
Simple, Hank is just really, really strong.
That's not what the first movie says, and obviously not what it does from looking at anything that happens in either movie. Hank carried a TANK on his keychain in that movie, obviously objects do not keep their mass. And the building??? The movie actually said objects maintain their "density," so you have to watch when tiny that you don't stab people with your fist. Also you're not going to get an actual explanation of what the Pym Particles do or how they work because Pym is so protective of the technology(also because it's utterly insane.)
@@trezapoioiuy ghost quantum tunnels through matter. that means she can phase through things like thin walls, but the floor is thick so she can't fall down. it also looked like she can control it to some extent.
"The three sea shells from Demolition Man?"
Hahahahaha! I'd forgotten about those! Well done.
Brought to you by "captain marvel" with 2 bonus end credit scenes in theaters this Friday
And dead in a week, all hail Endgame: The proper cut!
sojonin bitch
@@rew1677 Your reply has nothing to do with this comment - please don't spam
@@jezeski2011 so sharing a video that helps people understand somethings and see this is spam. I only did this here once
@@rew1677 I saw you post this same link on 2 different unrelated comments (Here and one other) and the linked video had nothing to do with either comment. That is pretty much the definition of spam. I called you out on that other one as well and you replied there with the word "kool" which made no sense. I think the better course of action is to simply report you for spam and be done with it.
Non-hood wearing Kermit me: That movie was good, I enjoyed that.
Hood-wearing Kermit me: Cinemasins reviewed it, RIP IT TO SHREDS JEREMY
“Downloading new skills on the fly”
Don’t you mean “New skills on *the wasp*”?
I’ll go ahead and sin myself...
Sin yourself if you must, but I'm still high-fiving you for that one.
ding
I appreciated that one.
I work as an assistant teacher.
At multiple schools over the years.
Never has the lost and found area ever been in the principal's office.
Even when I was a student it was never there either.
The lost and found at my elementary school was in the principals office.
Mine was just a dusty, spider-infested, cob web covered rack outside in the hallway with some clothes and lunch pails containing 2 year old sandwiches lol
@@awebtoonreader4979 well that's gross lol
Heck, I spent 5 years in the US and the school I went to just had a bookcase in the lunch room stocked with things people left behind, that's actually how I got this phone, and a new bag cuz my old one tore open one day.
1:58 the girl is wearing a helmet, Scott specifically made her wear that so she WOULDN’T get a concision
Wearing a helmet won't keep your brain from moving around in your skull should you hit your head hard enough. That being said Scott did give her some protection
I'm now going to make my primary concision..
The helmet would take most of the force or maybe all of it
And that's why there are never any concussions in the NFL.
@@eternalreign2313 Exactly
This does make you realize just how convenient it was that Antman or Wasp weren't around to just shrink Thanos or the Gauntlet.
There really should be a cinema sins on all the terrible puns in this comment section
Why? It's not cinema.
deathlord9907 comment sins eh
I can’t even find any. I’ve seen more comments ABOUT the puns than any comments WITH puns
Z🐝🐝 BEE 2 THE SET M🐝VIE
everything wrong with comment section puns in 15 minutes or less
(spoilers duh.....)
4:50 excellent point brought up about using super hero tech/abilities to improve the world. You could grow food to feed impoverished countries, Wolverine or Deadpool could have their healing factor studied to cure cancer, tony stark could create an arc reactor(s) to power the world without fossil fuels or nuclear waste, and don’t get me started on what dr strange could do to help the planet…but nah, let’s not focus on any of that type of stuff…
The Oatmeal Scene was a HIGH POINT! One of the biggest issues I had with the sequel was the reduction of screen time (and especially lines) for Pena, T.I. and Dastmalchion. Also the Truth Serum Scene! These were important for the humor/action balance. I admit that the truth serum scene sounds like it was snatched directly from Deadpool.
I’m not actually bothered by the convenience of who gets dusted and who doesn’t. It can be explained pretty well if you say that Dr. Strange did what he did so that certain people would survive and certain people would be dusted.
The Elemental Penguin first of all, it wasn’t a question lol
Second, I respectfully disagree. Although Thanos threatened to kill a lot of loved ones for the stones, and a lot did give him what he wanted to save them, there were still people willing to let their loved ones die to stop Thanos.
Star Lord was ready, and prepared, to sacrifice Gamora.
Scarlet Witch killed Vision to stop Thanos from getting the Soul Stone.
Doctor Strange does not strike me as a person who would give up anything that important for anyone. He is very smart and he isn’t particularly attached to Tony or Peter. He literally tells this to Tony when Tony saves him-“when it comes down to saving you, or the Time Stone, or the kid? I’m going to choose the Time Stone.” Doctor Strange was completely prepared to sacrifice Tony, Peter Parker, and anyone else to protect the Time Stone from Thanos. But when he looked into the future, and saw the one instance where they won, he saw Tony somehow being instrumental in defeating Thanos. So he chose Tony over the Time Stone, so that he could make reality the one future where the Avengers won.
I like to believe that when Doctor Strange saw 14,000,605 scenarios, in 14,000,604 of them, Star Lord ruins everything; but in the one scenario where things turn out okay, he only MOSTLY ruins everything.
Paul Rudd has joked that his Kids aren't that Impressive with Ant-Man compared to the other MCU Heroes.
Also that, as stated from the beginning of the first movie, the technology reduces the space between particles that make up atoms. So you could never be smaller than the sum of all the particles that make up your body.
Also, the closer the particles become, the more likely they would collide and release huge amounts of energy, probably setting off a chain reaction with all of the atoms in your body, causing you to explode like an atomic bomb.
Also the whole inconsistency of weight changes depending on whether or not it's relevant to that part of the movie.
Janet shrank small enough to fit between the molecules of the metal casing. You can’t both be small enough to fit between the molecules of the metal casing and large enough to do damage to the circuitry. Lest we forget, she continues to shrink with perpetually diminishing returns on her destructive potential. To even consider shrinking as a potential option suggests that Janet was suffering from too many blows to her head and was judgment impaired. That’s gotta be worth a Cinema Sin for the counter.
Maybe she flew into a small hole?
Let’s not forget they were first on top of a intermediate range missile, that used rockets instead of air-breathing engines. So, they would be fighting winds in the 600-1800mph range. (10x that if it was a ICBM, with a terminal velocity near Mach 25, not Mach 1-3)
If she really popped up and had the belt suddenly take all her weight, she would have easily been ripped in half. Not to mention you arms and legs being folded behind you.
They're kind of inconsistent about it but shrinking objects are supposed to retain their original mass. So at subatomic levels Janet would have the same powerful punch as a full sized human. At that size that amount of power to an atom could easily lead to the entire structure destabailizing.
@@BadWolf739 Except she wouldn't be able to see because photons would be larger than her head and not able to enter her eye without killing her instantly. Also, the Schwarzfield radius would apply if she retained the same mass and she'd be inside her own personal miniature black hole with no way of seeing anything at all, ever.
@@stylis666 Yes and Ironman's reactor shouldn't work and there's no serum that would give you superstrength while also turning your head into a red skull. This is comic book logic we are talking about. From a scientific perspective shrinking works one of two ways neither of which would be viable as both would kill a human. I do wish Antman had made a little more effort to establish a zone of "this works this way, it's ridiculous but accept it like this and everything else falls into place" instead of what they did which was have shrinking tech act however was convenient in whatever way they needed but if you're going to start targeting the realism of comic book movies you're going to very quickly realise that they aren't realistic in the slightest. It just comes down to what level of suspension of disbelief they can narratively justify before they lose the viewer.
The Ted Bundy reference had me rolling.
I just finished the Ted Bundy Tapes on Netflix and busted out laughing!
5:45 Jeremy, that's the whole fucking point of this movie. They don't know Thanos is coming. The whole point was to show what they were doing during infinity war. If you saw the fucking post credits scene, you'd see Pym died and Scott got stuck. Come on, Jeremy. It's like you don't even watch the movies you're sinning.
James Stark: Ben Edition I mean he does make a major point on the fact Hank has kept this technology a secret all this time
Cs: gets mad at movie bc they won’t help people with the super advanced technology they have.
Also CS: gets mad at Scott when he created a giant laptop that provides entertainment for at least 20 people
"Ulysses S. Gr-Ant"
No comment. Just SIN
🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂
It was just that bad
You're missing something big: In the first movie they stated that when something shrinks, it contains the same weight (the density changing), which is why when Scott shrinks in the bathroom, he dents the floor when he lands. However, in this one, they shrink that full-sized building, and then just pull it around like a light piece of luggage. It should still weigh the same as a building, and be near impossible to move. Not to mention, reducing that much weight into that small size would make it so dense it'd easily dent, if not fall through, the ground. I'm not blaming Marvel for this, I'm blaming you for not mentioning it.
Hank is capable of carrying a shrunken tank in the first movie, and Antony is capable of carrying a shrunken Scott, so that error existed in the previous movies. I don't remember if that was sinned in the Cinema Sins video for the first movie, but maybe it was, and Cinema Sins didn't feel like being redundant?
In the same vein of logic, expanding objects like the toy train in the first one, the ants in both or the candy dispenser in this one wouldn't make them heavier like the movies suggest. In fact, for some of the enlarged objects, their buoyancy would likely make them lighter than air so they'd float away.
I’ve always wondered why Ghost’s feet don’t faze. She said that they turned her into a weapon without thinking that one day she’ll fall to the earth’s core.
Do you want ants Lana?
BECAUSE THAT’S HOW YOU GET ANTS
Omg yes! Archer is amazing! Enough said. XD
uh phasing
That joke is already in this video.
Statalyzer Yeah.... I was........ quoting my favourite part.
Yeah the film had a lot of inaccuracies. It really ‘bugged’ me.
Keep them coming.
They where not inaccuracies...why would pym tell scott how his tech work when he didnt tell his own daughter...
The biggest of them: when Ghost can't interact with matter, how can she always interact with the ground?
@@trezapoioiuy She interacts with matter...She just shifts from reality...she is in a quantum flux...
Stelio Macumbe i thought Ant Man was gonna be the bad guy. Turns out he wasn’t the ant-agonist after all.
This was harmless fun .
We need more joyful movies like this .
Yeah like she could survive in the quantum realm for 30 years without food or water AND she has makeup here
It should've been outside space-time so she should still be in her 30s, not 60s. That would explain not eating, breathing, etc.
She mentioned that her body changed and called it "evolution" she might have got the x Gene and became a mutant she died before giving us more info . KEVIN FAIGEEEEE
12:25 or it could shrink the whole building, potentially killing everyone inside.
Tate Freeman what? It would just shrink everyone inside
@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 I said potentially, as the buildings and cars they shrink throughout the movie all have special devices built in, but this one doesn't so we don't know what would happen.
Tate Freeman and if we don’t know that doesn’t mean it’s a sin
And in the movie answers your dumb sin yes they survive
I may never recover from the mental image of Cary Grant bursting out of his grave to eat noncompliant screenwriters.
8:06
For a second there I was like
"Wait a second... Isn't that the guy from 'What if Google was a guy??"
It is the same guy...
THATS where i know him from
Omg thank you for that! I was going crazy trying to figure out where I knew him from.
Good thing jeremy didn't recognise him, he would've sinned the movie for that
And isn’t it not right how Hank and Hope were sent to jail, and broke out and are not being hunted down at the end of this movie?
I've watched so much cinema sins, I legit have started noticing all the tiny errors in movies I watch, and I nitpick at the movie as I watch it.
Most of these aint errors they are bull shit jokes
He literally once said there was no gravity in space and “space air”
@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 in open space, there is so little gravity that comparing it to no gravity would result in 0 differences. It's so similar to no gravity that it basically is 0 G. So hes not incorrect. And there is air in space. Clouds of hydrogen and oxygen are all over. It's not breathable though.
Have u got nits
You missed one:
“Adaptation is part of it, but some of it is... evolution”
Those are the same thing!
Those aren't the same things. Evolution is adaptation over generations, done by species and not individuals. She couldn't have evolved within her own lifetime, that would just be a mutation.
Yeah, adaptation is how an individual adapts to their environment, evolution is changes in genetic frequencies in a given population over time due to environmental pressures.
What, no "it's free real estate" outtake during the boat scene? That was a perfect opportunity to use that, considering that the actor from it is in that scene
Could probably feed the whole country of Ethiopia with a dozen bags of carrots. Hmmm.
what does this have to do with the movie lmao
@@naodp Making a potato the size of an office building makes a lot of food.
@@the-trustees If you enlarged food, according to the movie, you would just be increasing the space of the atoms, so all the food molecules would be the same. We as humans get energy from eating food when our body breaks apart the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen bonds in food. There would still be the same amount of bonds if you were to enlarge a carrot, so a gigantic carrot would have the same number of calories as a smaller carrot, therefore giving you the same amount of energy. Giving someone enlarged food wouldn't do anything except for probably make it take longer for them to eat it.
that would just be a lot of empty calories
@@praveersharan3775 Not true. If it was, the enlarged quantum tunneled wouldnt work as its atoms would be too far apart to allow.
"The 3 sea shells from demolition man"
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂💀☠💀☠💀☠💀
You killed me lmao
Now that you’re completely caught up with the MCU (and Captain Marvel won’t be on Blu-Ray until June), can you please sin The Avengers (1998) when Endgame comes out?
Pretty sure they already sinned the original Avengers
@@appleappington7346 He means the non-MCU one, with Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman.
@@appleappington7346 You're dumb.
@@appleappington7346 That particular Avengers movie are not even superhero related. It is British movie. And this movie is the reason why real Avengers movie was called Marvel's The Avengers in United Kingdom.
@@SuperStreetWarriorAnd that would be the joke.
2:51 It's true. My divorced parents are still friends.
Brian Jr Spero this nigga...
No need to brag
Handsome With The Handgun 😂😂
@@rew1677 Your reply has nothing to do with this comment - please don't spam
@@jezeski2011 kool
*I s2g, if a sin doesn't get taken off for Luis' narrative after he gets the truth serum....*
The building is powered by Duracell batteries and there is no plumbing
50% of all living things could easily get a whole extended family and leave the neighbours untouched, so three people on a roof isn't a big deal.
preciousinfinity Do the snap included plants is it 50% of all life or 50% of all species if it the former there is a possibility that an entire species be extinct and another being virtually unfazed
While true, every scene we see where people get dusted has resulted in over 50% of the main characters getting dusted. Hell, it was supposed to be 50% of each planet, but he took out almost everyone on his home planet.
Francisco Chavez i pretty sure thanos home world die out from civil war
@@Phoenix-vf4nd You don't need to be from a planet in order to be on that planet.
He's not sinning the possibility of it (he even acknowledged it was possible), he's sinning the coincidence of it being purely plot-convenient as opposed to feeling truly random like it wants you to believe it is.
I have always wondered how the next Avengers movie would go if Thanos was among the 50% he snapped out of existence.
@David Mcmahon
YOOOO!!!
I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE
HEY LOOK! THE HALL MONITOR TEACHER IS THE "WHAT IF GOOGLE WAS A PERSON" GUY!!!!
Also, I would've loved a sin removed for the music at the "child-Scott" scene. Itself it was a fun-ok-ish scene, but music really had me rolling
Nice Paul Simon "Mother and child reunion" reference. Caught me like a boomerang on the way back.
60% of the time, it's the vectors every time
cracked me up XD
meta
Ron Burgundy reference, anyone? No? I'll let myself out.
5:45 and just like that, Jeremy has solved all Marvel's problems. . .
@grandeurlies Yeeesssssss thank you!
Or making it harder
In defense of Pym not using this technology for the benefit of all, the opening of the first Ant-Man established that Pym did try to present his tech for the benefit of all, only to have Howard Stark steal it and try to make weapons out of it. After that, Pym determined that the danger of it becoming a weapon was too great to offset the benefits to humanity.
4:38 - Uh, that's how she got stuck in the first place.
Honestly I agree with the whole “why are Hank and Hope criminals too” thing because imagine if someone stole a computer from Apple and then used it to commit a crime that’s like saying Apple is also to blame, it doesn’t make any sense
applez are criminals
Another sin to be added: Scott and Hank´s family decide to experiment, while at the same time, Thanos´army is attacking the earth. At least they should know about the first attack on New York led by Squidward (it was on the news), but in the postcredit scene of this movie, it looks like they are pretty careless about that. (this was acknowledged by HISHE)
I think that because all of this stuff was happening at the exact same time as Infinity War, they had obviously too many distractions to pay attention to what the bigger picture was.
You have to remember what happened the last time Scott jumped into an Avengers battle without being asked; he was arrested and put on house arrest for 2 years for violating the Sakovia Accords. For all we know they were doing those experiments as part of some project to stop Thanos and were told to finish them before joining the fight.
@@Dargonhuman They specifically said they went in there to get to help stabilize Ghost. No mentions about the attack on NY that happened at least two days earlier.
@@Gozokukolat How could it be two days earlier? Attack on NY and Thanos' Decimation happened the same day.
They were in San Francisco.
They were busy dealing with their own problems.
I'm sure they didn't have any time to watch views.
@@kacpernowak1535 (sorry for the tardy) I may have hyperbolized a bit much. It actually takes around 21 hours.
Bruce calls Cap around 1:42pm New York Time (10:42am San Fran Time) according to the phone. Then 'The Snappening' occurs close to 10:24am NYT (7:24am SFT) according to Furry's GPS and that it's day time in NY. So 21 hours 18 minutes, more than a day if realistic travel restrictions are placed on the heroes but it's a super hero movie so... not so much.
This still leaves a full news cycle for the Pym crew to have learned about NY.
5:37.....I was thinking the exact same thing during the movie