32-inch 4K OLED Gaming Monitor with Heatsink, BFI & 480Hz (vs 32" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz Monitor)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 січ 2024
- We visit ASUS's booth at CES 2024, & take a first look at the ROG Swift PG32UCDP 4K OLED gaming monitor with UHD (3840x2160) resolution & 240Hz refresh rate, which can go up to 480Hz albeit at a lower resolution of full HD (1920x1080).
Other products launched by ASUS at CES 2024 include the ROG Swift PG27AQDP OLED monitor with 480Hz refresh rate & 2560x1440 resolution.
To learn more about the latest ROG Swift OLED monitors, please visit: rog.gg/ROGSwiftOLED_HDTVtest
The "Includes Paid Promotion' message in this video refers to the sponsorship by ASUS.
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co.uk/
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.net/@hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest - Наука та технологія
I hope heatsinks become standard for OLED monitors.
Oddly no mention of this is going to have HDMI 2.1 or Display Port 2.1 I bought the first QD-Oled and it's stuck with HDMI 2.0 🤦♂️shoulda waited.
@@shadowarez1337 According to Asus's website the 4k monitor has HDMI 2.1 and Display Port 1.4 with Display Stream Compression.
yeah, either passive or even active cooling. I never heard the fans on the g-sync modules that people complained about. When you're gaming another fan is not a big deal lol.
A fan is just one extra thing to go wrong, and they typically do make annoying sounds in monitors since they are so small.@@hellowill
@@hellowill exactly either you have headphones or a nice sound setup. Me personally when I game I load up some powerwolf and Destiny for clearing weekly's on 3 characters can't hear the 15 fans in my Corsair 1000D 😂
Been waiting 20 years for this!!
Please pass along to Asus that we desperately wish for a fully configurable BFI setting, Both to configure the duty cycle of the bfi setting, from 20% to 80%, and offer bfi support at atleast 240hz, and 120hz, with consideration made for 60hz bfi. 480hz BFI is not the highest priority, however the more feature rich the better.
Edit: I thoroughly encourage those who are not fully informed on the benefits of BFI / Strobing to take some time to look through the blurbusters documentation on the benefits of a one millisecond mprt and how BFI will enable us to get there on our sample and hold displays.
Seconding everything in your comment, especially BFI support at 120hz and 240hz.
If you don't mind giving up VRR, you can do software BFI and get 120hz problem on a 240hz monitor. For 120hz, if you want 1/2 pulses, you black out every other frame at 240hz. 1/3rd pulses, then run 180hz and black out every third frame. 1/4th, then 240hz and every fourth frame. Sure you can't do less than 50% but it's still a great experience.
60hz, again, give up VRR and you have have a ridiculous amount of options, up to a low of 25% by blanking all but 1 frame.
I think if these sort of work arounds ever become more popular besides hacky shaders in retroarch and reshade, we could see much better software solutions. Particularly finding a middleground between completely blacking out a frame and just reducing the brightness. Fading from 100% to 0% over 2-3 frames would be pretty ideal and closer to a CRT
YES please just give the users/buyers of your monitor choice don't lock off 60hz BFI because some people find it dim/flicker give us the people BUYING your product the option!
Forget that. Please pass along that their customer service is shit, and they need to fix that.
It's only taking 3 decades to get TVs that display motion as good as CRTs.
Love your videos man. Ive been watching you for a while.
Man, we're going from bare scraps to a deluge in the OLED monitor space. Hell yeah!
I couldn't switch back from my current 48" C1 that's on my desk. I've gotten so used to the size... So no 240hz for me in the near future I suppose.
@@Zastrutzki 48" as a desktop monitor?? u good???
If you have a reasonable sized desk its no problem at all. Been running my 48" CX this way for years now. @@ecommax02
All with DP1.4 💀
@@Zastrutzki I know what you mean. I currently use the Gigabyte F048U 48 inch OLED monitor and don't want to go down in size. It looks like I will be waiting for something in the future.
Would be interesting to see the difference between Gigabyte QD-OLED/Samsung Display and ASUS/LGD WOLED.
woled is still superior imo, you gotta ask yourself, why are you buying an oled monitor? well, for the perfect blacks of course! and on qd oleds, the blacks turn grey, which IMO, defeats the entire purpose of buying an oled. maybe this can be fixed for qd oleds someday, but until it is, i will always be in the woled camp.
The sub pixel layout is so important for them actually getting sales!
This video is crazy, the sky changed like 4 times, lol. Excited to see great monitors this year, please do a video with which one will be better for console gaming.
His enthusiasm also changed like 4 times lol.
Getting a monitor like this is leaving a lot of performance on the table using a console. Better to use the money to get an OLED TV. Trading framerate for a larger screen
LG transparent OLED behind him obvvv
I just bought a G3, switched to the bright mod, through a program on my PC I set the settings as in the filmmaker mod, as a result I get absolutely the same quality, but with maximum brightness, I’m happy. I did the same for HDR and got an interesting result - as if DTM and HGIG were working simultaneously, as a result, the average brightness is high and the highlights are the same as in HGIG, but sometimes this causes a feeling of unnaturalness, simply because the highlights are too bright against the background of everything the rest.
I would be glad if you would conduct a similar test and accurately measure whether the bright mode is really so accurate, it probably won’t be so in the program, but in real content they look identical, with the exception of the increased brightness in the bright mode.
Couldn't give a shit about anymore matte oled monitors. Bring on the 32 inch glossy monitor baby!
Vincent, did you happen to ask if the QDOLED or the 1440p WOLED monitors would also have a BFI option?
Thank you so much for all your work!!i wonder why hasn't anyone done a comparison for tv cpu?same comparison like pc cpu for example.thank you :)
Got to love that light bar cause we all love to elevate black levels on our OLED panels 😂 .
Lots of (QD-)OLED monitors at CES, yet only 2 with DisplayPort 2.1 (confirmed)?
Are you going to cover QDEL from SHARP?
What the hell is QDEL?
Newer DP is currently not really needed yet apparently. See TFTCentral Article about 2.1
there are a couple 2.1 (finally), some of the hp omen stuff, some of the gigabyte monitors and another company i dont remember
I have a LG monitor that has HDMI 2.1
@@PSYCHOV3N0M Self emissive Quantum Dot panel (as opposed to the typical back illuminated QLED), basically OLED benefits without the burn in risk.
SHARP with their new QDEL display is most interesting news this year.
can't wait to see this tech hit the market
27 inch 4k 1000hz glossy QDEL with Dolby Vision and 2000 nit peak brightness. How long do I have to wait?
@@AndrewK117 Until MicroLED is released, which is beyond our lifetime
This is awesome, they're finally starting to take advantage of OLED's gaming superiority. I'm kind of a freak and wish it was in 48". The next thing I hope to see is simultaenous BFI and VRR.
LG has a couple large OLED's coming out in 2025 with better text clarity for PC monitor users
@@zenon3021 Yeah with crappy 800R curve and matte coating wihch is garbage
The subpixel improvement is important. Does it still do that weird variable zone brightness thing?
Looks awesome 👌👌👌
Hey Vincent what do you think about that QDEL Prototype panel that sharp showed off at ces?
LG needs to offer glossy 32" option quick or they will lose sales to its competitor.
Are you listening? There will be a glossy QD-Oled version.
@@ecommax02 IT'S NOT THE SAME THING! He wants the LG OLED version with a Glossy Panel. Comprehend what he's trying to say before you shoot your mouth off. 🙄
@@ecommax02 Since when does LG produce QD-Oled?
@@doctorfresh3856 Are you his lawyer?
I don't think LG Display decides whether Asus makes the screen glossy or not.
FINALLY BFI IS HERE
Having seen both the qd-oled and woled models which would you purchase?
My dream OLED monitor:
-Glossy finish like on LG C series OLED TVs
-1440p resolution wtih 480 HZ refresh rate
-BFI option that can work with VRR at the full 480 HZ that still alllows HDR to be used. Adjustable strobing rate would also be nice to decide if you prioritize brightness or motion clarity.
-Dolby Vision support
-Don't care much if its WRGB or QD
OLED, both are great
-1000 nits or better of peak brightness
-HGIG support
The MLA monitor sounds like essentially the same monitor as the LG version on yesterday’s video. I wouldn’t be surprised that the panels are identical and that the only difference is software. It’d be interesting to see a side-by-side comparison.
Yes they are the same. LG-display and Samsung-display manufacture the WOLED and QD-OLED panels. All the vendors do is build the display and software around it.
Hahahaha choosing between Bella and Jiji... ho my god. I watch these videos sometimes just to know what you will come up with. Keep up the good work!
I may not be able to buy these (though I can probably push for a 1440p model) as I want a new oled tv
. but it's so nice to see models coming out. next year it might become common
Monitor choices are going to be very difficult this year. I'm considering either the new Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 (G80SD model), or the 120Hz Dell UltraSharp 34 Curved Thunderbolt Hub Monitor (U3425WE). Both have their merits and concerns.
What would you recommend for 50% spreadsheet/Photoshop work, and 50% city builder/sim gaming? The monitor is often left on for extended periods, so OLED burn-in does concern me. But I also have a Sony OLED TV and absolutely love the colours and pure blacks. I'm not experienced with curved monitors, although the Dell curve seems quite mild. As for refresh rates, will the 240Hz of the Samsung panel be noticeably better than the 120Hz Dell? Thanks in advance.
Hard to know if one should go with the QD-OLED varieties that are out now (or coming out soon) vs the new WOLED layout coming in 2H 2024; which will have less burn in issues? Which will have better text clarity? Thus far, the new layout seen in the QD-OLED varieties dramatically improves on text clarity (though still not perfect), but the plan is to use a different WOLED layout for the ones in 2H 2024. Hard to know what to do.
Finally looks like there's one glossy screen option! 👏🏼
3:36 smooth transition 🤣😂👍
UCDM looks like a winner so far.
Will you be able to play the 1080 res on a 24 inch mode like the asus 27 inch OLED monitor?
Thanks for the video, Vincent! When can we expect OLED TVs to support refresh-rates of 240 Hz and beyond (at 4K, 4:4:4)? What is holding them back?
And why TVs still don't have DisplayPort inputs? As a PC gamer, I find it infuriating and I can't think of any reasonable explanation as to why this is the status quo.
And another question - will any of the 2024 QD-OLED/WOLED TV panels support BFI/low persistence mode at 120/144 Hz? I really hope they bring this option back because I personally value motion clarity above peak brightness.
I'm dreaming of the day we get 65+" 1000Hz displays (OLED, microLED, QDEL or similar self-emissive tech) with over 4000 nits peak brightness for crystal clear HDR gaming goodness... and high quality, low latency frame extrapolation techniques (aka "reprojection" or "asynchronous space warp", similar to what's used in VR headsets, but better) by the GPU manufacturers to maintain these 1000fps ;)
I just want this as a Glossy WOLED, why is it so hard to see a glossy variant for WOLED?
Because marketing research confirmation bias. They all huddle up in their board meeting and say hmm which sells better? Glossy or matte? Our matte sales dominate.
Might that have something to do with the fact that consumers have no choice???
Most WOLED is either 800R or Matte, even both SIGH. Also lacks colors compared to QD-OLED.
@@Dr.WhetFarts That's because of the polarizer and matte anti-glare crap.. If they at least got rid of Matte it would be a lot more competitive still not as good but closer.
I find it so funny that after all these years we finally got a gimped version of a feature we lost after “upgrading” from CRTs with the ability to change display resolution and max refresh rate per resolution natively. CRTs could pretty much do any resolution and refresh within the monitors spec natively. This only has two resolutions with two different max refresh rates depending on resolution but at least a step in right direction. It’s insane to me we still haven’t fully caught back up to the features we left behind with CRTs. LCD’s were a mistake. Only now with Oleds are we finally getting closer to getting back features we had in the fucking 80’s-00’s lmao. Even then we still aren’t quite there, blows my mind. Idiots gave up color, motion resolution, no latency, multi-native resolutions, contrast, high refresh rates, and overall quality for lighter and bigger lcd monitors with less color, less constrast, absurd lag, one refresh rate (usually 60hz), one native resolution, ugly pixels, horrid motion, blurry upscaling, and just altogether horrible image. I never understood people switching over to LCDs and DLPs even then. When I finally got one I was disgusted and returned it so I kept my Trinitron. Wasn’t till Plasma I finally enjoyed a flat panel but have always kept my CRT’s and still used them on case by case basis. I really hate that stupid consumers in masses were obsessed with having the biggest tv possible, brainwashed by marketing, made gaming such a painful experience for so long by downgrading our standards. Like even now cause of idiots still buying mostly dvd’s Walmart’s barely even carry 4k Blu-ray, let alone even normal Blu-ray. My local walmart has 4 movies in 4k for sale….but two aisles of DVDs….yeah 480i looks great 4k backlit LCD’s. Jackasses.
Anyways thanks for listening to my tedtalk of “most consumers are stifling technological growth and product quality with their poor knowledge, poor decisions, and easy manipulation”. Just remember consumers also chose worse quality vhs over the superior betamax just cause initial players weren’t as convenient at recording live tv and stuck with their stupidity even when all Betamax players had that feature.
input lag, refresh rate, pixel response time, 1) a deep dive to talk about they relate to each other please.
Wait, no glossy option? WHY NO GLOSSY?!! JUST WHY!!! 😱😭😭😭😭
Because, don’t you know? The marketing executives know what’s best for us! They do market research and find that matte displays dominate sales. Geee I wonder why? Could it have anything to do with the fact that’s the only option consumers have?
The qd oled one has glass
Alienware monitor is glossy the MSI is glossy aswell and gigabyte so it's just to wait
There are at least 8 glossy monitors on the market, and only 3 matte including this one. You just have to choose what you prefer. For my part, I prefer comfortable matte screens for daily and prolonged use.
Our prayers have been answered! 😆 Someone is listening. This is what I’m talking about where do I pay! 👍🏼
Bfi on a pc monitor, what a time to be alive :)
Nice! 😎👍
Does the ROG Swift OLED PG39WCDM have a glossy or Matt finish screeen??
Could BFI be coming back to W-OLEDs?
Finally they seem to have implemented an option to disable "Automatic Input Detection". Their lineup is currently almost unusable if you have multiple PC's connected.
How is the HDR10 tracking of the QD OLED version?
love the idea of a dual display mode monitor. there are absolutely plenty of games that im willing to drop to 1080p in favor of 480hz, but also lots of games are capped anyways so might as well play at 4k. think im leaning more toward the lg version if the speaker implementation is good, but bfi could change my mind. cant wait for reviews of these.
Same but 1080p never looks good on 4k monitors.
1080 on 4k monitor looks like hot garbage. They should just make a high refresh rate 1080 monitor for competitive gamers. It would also bring the price down.
@@OrangeGuy 1080p is exactly 1/4 4K. So it will just take 4 pixels and "merge" them into one.
In other words it will look exactly how 1080p looks. Just straight up native 1080p clarity.
They should have put the "tactical switch" on this for the 1080p 480hz mode. Its a feature on the new Gigabyte QD-OLED, which switches to a 24 inch aspect ratio. 1080p on a 32 screen is horrible.
@@branchprediction9923 this is OLED, not CRT
I’m so torn on which to do for.
QDOLED - Glossy panel but purple tint
WOLED - Matte screen with proper blacks
Why can’t LG just give us a WOLED Glossy panel
Do you use your monitor in such a bright room that the elevated blacks will be a problem?
BTW in a bright room a matte coated screen might elevate blacks too, especially if there's a reflection on the screen.
don’t forget that qd oled gets scratched very easily from just cleaning, I know a guy with aw3423dwf and it’s completely scratched after 1 year…this & the purple tint is a deal breaker for me
i clean mine with the microfibre cloth provided by alienware inside the box and have had zero scratches and also no burn in yet although i almost baby my monitor
its one of the best purchases of my life, i have zero remorse
and im very picky with everything i have ocd lol
@@branchprediction9923 my desk is next to my window. I currently have a 42 inch c2 with no issues but have been waiting for a 32 inch oled. I buy oled for the deep inky blacks. I’m not getting that of the QD is giving me purple instead of black as the c2 does
The WOLED is better in every way besides color reproduction which is a bit worse.
Сool, so many new 4k 240hz oled monitors....which one should i buy?
Why won’t LG give us glossy 😂😂
will the ucdm have bfi at 240hz ?
I wonder what’s going to look better the oled 340hz monitors with quantum dot or the ones with MLA
Hope for BFI!!
how does switching to 480 on the fly work ? it can force OS to change refresh rate and resolution or is it just the internal and os still thinks its on 240 @ 4k ? if its just internal its a just a dumb and probably expensive gimmick. I still remember those tv`s that had some ridiculous Hz numbers but could not actually take any signal above 60 hz.
Hi, Vicent. Can you confirm if 27" 480hz OLED will be matt or glossy through your contacts at Asus? There is apparently some heated discussion about it among the gamers. I did watch a few channels confirming 32" MLA OLED will be matt, but 27" 480 will be glossy. There were about three 27" 480hz OLED monitors at Asus booth. I thought only one had the protective film (one with UFO), but the other two did not.
Look at 3:57 he put a disclaimer on the screen that they left the peel on the monitor which makes it look glossy but it's actually matte
Is it glossy coating and does the BFI work at 60hz strobe?
When will this monitor, which I am eagerly waiting for, be available for sale, please reply.
I’m using a series x Xbox to play gears of war 5. What’s the best monitor for that limitation or console. I don’t want to spend too much for features I can’t use like 240hz but I want to get a decent monitor with good screen. Please any suggestions or model numbers ?
That 480Hz 1440p monitor will be my next one if I have money by the time it releases (unless something better releases with the same refresh rate and peak brightness or higher than this)
Can’t wait until this tech trickles down to TVs
Gigi and Bella Hadid 😂 This guy puts in his jokes so smoothly into his discussions 😂 Good informative video 👊🏿
Let's just hope that the 1080p mode is scaled used nearest neighbor... Imagine 480hz of bilinear blur 💀
I'm going to SO get this monitor. Take my money.
So does fringing look better on the new WOLEDs than 3rd gen QD-OLED panels? This year LG is doing a great job, closing the gap with Samsung - cant wait for a proper review comparing the 2 technologies later in the year!
It seems both WOLED and QD OLED have improved their subpixel arrangement leading to better text clarity. Doubt there will be much of a difference at 4K, though if I had to guess I'd say the QD OLED will have the upper edge since it simply doesn't have that odd white subpixel.
My Alienware AW3225QF comes in on Monday and I can let you know how it is. It uses the new QD-OLED panels and is a 32in 4k 240hz
@@potion7410 Let me know if it has BFI bro.
@@branchprediction9923IF WE CARE about the text quality at all, then it means we use those monitors for non-gaming and non-video purposes a lot, and so far none of the OLEDs are acceptable for this due to burn-ins (QD-OLEDs are especially bad). This is why for those scenarios it is better to buy mini-LED-backlit displays which have lifetime guarantee against burn-in and also have much better HDR (OLEDs are super bleak in comparison, even the best ones). But, of course, the drawbacks are also inevitable.
I think WOLED will have a more lifelike picture, but would love to see both side by side
Hi, I have LG C2 Evo 48 and I wish to know if is normal to have hue shifting from red to green when viewing from small angles like 20 degrees.
I wonder why LG doesn't make a 32" C4/G4 TV with these panels from LG Display. That would be a killer TV!
Too small of a market.
@@20puskinas1992 I disagree. There's a huge market for 32" OLEDs.
@@20puskinas1992u tripping if u think ASUS is bigger then LG
So, which one is better? 3rd Gen WOLED + MLA (1300nits)(Matte) vs 3rd Gen QD-OLED (1000nits)(Glossy).
I hope it uses integer scaling to avoid artifacts. I mean, 1080p to 4k is just 4:1 so it should be easy.
im curious to see the overclocking capabilities of this display. I know your probably limited by the cable but could be cool to mess with pixel times and resolutions
I really hope they use integer scaling/nearest neighbor upscaling for the 1080p mode. If you can't configure that and instead get a blurry and messy upscaled presentation, that mode is basically dead
I would assume integer scaling otherwise it does not make any sense
@@youp1tralala yeah exactly, which is why it's so critical to confirm this
Which TV are you using in your house.
Why can't you just change the Aspect Ratio to make the screen smaller to run it in that 480Hz mode. The QD OLED version has aspect ratio control.
It would be the og monitor if it also gave you 1440p 360hz also
We need to know what HZ this monitor can EU run @1440p
I am wondering if it actually hits 1300 nits (last year said 1000 but hit 600 i believe?) And if the colour red,yellow and gold are as accurate as on qd-oled with this one. And how does text fringing look?
It was 1000 nits on a 10% window I believe.
ASUS says 1300 nits on a 3% window.
Color brightness definitelly won't be like on QD OLED.
Text clarity is improved because of an improved subpixel arrangement. 4K obviously helps with clarity too.
*wild thornberry donnie sounds*
Choice of 4k 32 is easy glossy wins
It's here
ask asus if we can get pre order on that dual oled 4k 240hz monitor please vincent and pricing
Has there been any proof that a heatsink helps prevent burn in? Just curious, since I haven’t seen much as far as heat sink vs non heat sink burn in. Just seems like it wouldn’t do much since the pixels aren’t actually “burning” in.
Heatsinks reduce heat, in Sony TVs at least they have been shown to completely eliminate image retention, and I'm guessing burn in as well. You still have to use an OLED correctly though if you don't want burn in permanently.
I wonder whether they will support both BFI & VRR.
Im certain it will be withour VRR.
@branchprediction9923 it has VRR, it's in specs.
@@Danatar555 The question is whether it will support both at the same time.
So how bad is the matte coating ?
"Hopefully you will be able to make this box disappear" LOL
Other than the refresh rate, if I own a gaming PC and a ps5, is a 42" LG C3 better than this monitor?
I would go for either the QD OLED or WOLED 32" 4K monitor.
If you need or want that size just stick with it. The C3 has great HDR but lacks SDR tho. If you move up to a QD-OLED display it's gonna be a big difference in brightness and color saturation.
A couple of years ago I returned my 42" C2 for a 55" S95B for just a little more and don't regret it at all. Yeah it's a bigger size but I run 21:9 while on PC so it's not bad and I could sit closer. For 16:9 I do move further away tho. I have a wireless everything setup so it's not so bad. I believe Samsung will now have a 42" version but I'm not 100% sure if it's QD-OLED tho.
32" is nice too but only if you're planning to play in 16:9 all the time. I like both so having a display as big as 42", 48", 55" will be great. The 55" converts over to a 52" 21:9 display @ 1600p. I believe that's the same height as a 38"-42" display.
I have the same and honestly it depends on your use-case. For me a 32 inch monitor is perfect, but until now, the Alienware AW3225QF, Asus PG32UDCM, HP Omen transcend 32 or Samsungs variant are the clear winners in terms of performance and looks. The LG C3 is great for movies, but sdr is not very bright and HDR peak brightness is around 600. The QD-OLEDS are glossy as well and 1000 nits peak brightness and higher sdr brightness and achieve more accurate colours.
0:32 So does that mean people are stuck using that stand for the monitor?
You can capture the motion performance by moving the camera at the same velocity as the UFO.
how come no QD OLED monitors? They were definitely at CES?
QD-OLED sucks. Have you seen the latest QD-OLED Tvs from Samsung? They look like LCD screens. OLED is much better.
Why does this monitor have to go down to 1080p for 480Hz, when the smaller 27" panel can stay at 1440p at 480Hz? Couldn't this monitor also just drop to 1440p to satisfy the same bandwidth cap?
But how does it compare to LG 32GS95UE (new gaming monitor)? Which one to chose? (when not looking at the size of the screens).
Always pick the LG over the Asus just because if something goes wrong you don't want to have to deal with Asus.
Does the monitor properly integer scale to 1080p when stepped down? Otherwise there will be blur.
Monitors don't have scaling chips....
Gonna be blur no matter what. 1080p at 32 inches at monitor viewing distance is downright disgusting.
It seems like pretty much any resolution under native looks like crap on screens.@@soulshot96
Proper scaling of lower resolutions that fit integer-scaled in the monitor's native resolution is something that manufacturers will need to get to perfection, as this multi-screen modes (res+refres combinations) is a new paradigm for displays and one we need to start seeing on more 4K (and soon in 8K) monitors. It's truly awesome stuff.
Integer-scaled resolutions should not be blurry if done right. They will inevitably look more blocky than the native resolution, but that comes with the territory. I am perfectly ok with 1080p at 32, even at 40 inches with very fast-paced games, the immersion is still there for me if the display is engineered rightly.
I'll just stick to native resolution....@@edfort5704
Did ASUS say if this monitor will implement nearest neighbor scaling for the 1080p 480Hz mode? This feature is in almost no displays of any type in the market, TV, PC, or mobile, so this would be a very exciting product if it can display a crisp pixel-perfect 1080p image.
3% window huh? This marketing BS is getting out of hand. What is the full 100% brightness screen value. Yea HDR highlights look great but I dont care about a 3% window. Manufactures should NOT be able to advertise any value under a certain screen size. This is a joke. This is like the Contrast BS back in the day or plasma refresh rates of 600hz.
FINALLY, AN OLED MONITOR WITH BFI. I love my C9 and I don't change because I use the 120Hz BFI yo play my games. Motion Clarity almost good as a CRT. Now imagine BFI @240Hz ...
How does 120Hz BFI work when the TV can only display 120Hz in total? It has to make every second frame black after all.
I thought 9 series don't support 120Hz BFI? Or was there an update recently?
@@cube2fox That's not how it works, native hardware BFI isn't limited like this. 120hz BFI on LG C9/CX/C1 is in fact 120fps, yes.
Keep in mind the BFI will halve brightness and also isn’t compatible with VRR until G Sync Pulsar is out but yes very cool feature, wish the TVs kept that 9 series feature!!
@@Ranguvar13 I don't care so much about brightness, since my eyes get used to it.
is this one passively cooled or does it have a fan ??
Im sure it's passive.
All of the Monitors are passive cooling, unless they make a 960Hz with liquid cooling in the future lol
I'm not sure how I feel about the UCDP having a matte finish. I'd rather it be glossy like the MLA Panel on LG's TV's, but I really don't want the QD-OLED in the UCDM with 300 less nits.
is there a relation to fps vs refresh rate? like do you have to match the refresh rate with fps to be ideal?
It would be ideal to match it, yeah.
what about burn in hiw like could it still happen??
can it be used with macbook with single usbc cable?
Matte coating...yikes.
So, BFI is kind of just a way to hack our cognition to make motion look smoother. But I've been thinking, at what point is this "hack" no longer effective? And does 480Hz approach that? Surely at some point motion becomes so smooth that BFI isn't needed anymore.
Blurbuster admin is hoping to help with making bfi better for upcoming displays.
BFI on a 240 Hz or even 120hz display would be absolute madness!!
BFI on a modern high refresh rate display is the closest we can get to CRT motion clarity so far, so I'm really happy to see it starting to go mainstream.
@@TheEngine-gw2vs I really hope the QD OLED 4K240 gets it too.
@@TheEngine-gw2vs I hope BFI implementation will become good enough that it’ll be on by default on TV’s
My 55 inch LG C1 TV has 120 HZ BFI and on its highest motion clarity setting, which is OLED Motion Pro High in the settings menu, it gives you 3.2 ms of blur persistence which is the equivalent of having 312 HZ.
The resulting motion looks amazing, but because an LG C1 has 800 nits of peak brightness in HDR without BFI, it looks pretty dim with BFI on OLED Motion Pro High so you lose some highlight detail.
With 1300 nits of peak brightness in HDR on the 4K 240 HZ and 1440p 480 HZ WRGB OLED's, BFI brightness reduction should thus give it a more tolerable brightness.
@@TheEngine-gw2vs exactly the reason why I'm so excited!
Having rgb pixels means this is the first oled worthy of calling itself a monitor, glossy coating, high refresh, bfi...They need to ship with at least a 5 year warranty for burn in and They are almost ready for prime time.