It was an editing cut. There is a continuity error at the end. Quinton is not holding a cup then suddenly he has it full grasp. Ipso facto, there is a full interview somewhere without him getting cut off.
I think it was a joke that flopped. Stephen was asking why he had so much more material than could fit in the movie. Quentin was explaining time constraints. Stephen cut him off, for a time constraint. F*ing hilarious, perfect timing, straight-faced. And not even a giggle in the crowd.
Yes, and the worst part is - even if Tarantino continued his thoughts after the interruption, the next clip wasn't uploaded. The other clip is about another part of the conversation. I was SO into Tarantinos story here. Even though I respect Colbert a lot as an interviewer, this is a bummer.
I love how Tarantino talks about how he has all this extra material for a great movie that he had to cut because of time (very understandably) and is immediately cut off by a commerical as he is about to get into the groove. What a moment
@@brysonlozano7 I'm fine with that more power t him, and i absolutely admire SOME of his movies (Reservoir Dogs, Pulp fiction, Jackie Brown). His recent output a bit less - Kill Bill, Deathproof, Inglorious Basterds, DjangoUnchained, Hateful Eight, ONce Upon a Time - and not going in the right direction. Too much self indulgent dialogue scenes which aren't as crisp as in Pulp or Dogs. Hateful Eight - pfftshould have been a Broadway play - instead of a static 1 set (which they took a good half hour before reaching the one set they used) non-action action movie - even as a one set thriller movie - it just wasn't thrilling enough, cause they bored you to death with the tangents of dialogue. 2 -Too many self indulgent "hommages" to his well of inspiration (the b movies). While I love his choices of giving cameo's and roles to underused icons, actors from days past - who all well deserve it) - frequently the "homage" as for example in the endless fights of Kill Bill 1 make you nostalgic for the better and better balanced originals, who achieved a greater effect on a pittance of a Tarantino budget and a pittance of the technical means. His love is genuine for these movies, but too many homages/citations which fail to live up to the original - and he ends up with very little or too little that he brings himself to the table. The snowfight in Kill bill for example. I'd say just go watch the original Lady Snowblood and i have a sneaking suspicion Tarantino would agree with me. Thirdly self indulgent length of the movies and increasingly less smart "twists/ideas". The once upon a time idea might have been charming at 75 minutes length in a sleek, lean B-movie - but at 3hours or so it becomes an unending monster with a meagre outcome. And yeah, he's a bit full of himself (which has nothing to with his qualities as a filmmaker) - but....bit of self reflection..
I was not prepared for how much I was going to enjoy "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood." It was terrific. It dropped me right into my childhood of barely remembered tv news stories: Manson family trials, Vietnam war, and Patty Hearst.
He’s such a unique wide-open faucet of a person, he could be on the spectrum for all we know which would almost better explain his genius and level of intricate elaboration. Truly one of a kind artist and talent.
"W.W. and the Dixie Dance Kings" is a Drive-in / Second feature staple with Burt Reynolds, Art Carney and Jerry Reed. It was also directed by John G Alvidsen, who would direct "Rocky" the following year and "The Karate kid" after that. 2 bags of buttered popcorn are required when you watch this classic.
One thing about novelizations is that it enables the youngins (8 year old me, for example) to "see", or experience, movies that he would not be able to see (like Alien, Friday the 13th, etc...). It represents freedom for the little ones. Another great thing about novelizations is that they often include additional or modified scenes from the movie as well as providing internal monologues that explain certain things that the movie's actor or director could not provide for a variety of reason (often lack of skill).
You're eight years old and you want to watch Alien or Friday the 13th? OK, I agree, reading the novelization conveys all the essence of these films, and allows you to use your imagination to provide the vision. But--given that you can read and are interested in reading--there are a thousand greater things for you to read than any of these novelizations. There are actual novels. Written by men and women from many different countries for the last five hundred years. At least just try some of these.
Watching Tarantino talk about "spinner racks" takes me back to Devonshire Drugstore in DET, and Stephen's rapturous stare makes me realize we 3 are part of a certain "American" generation
OMG, I can't believe that they're geeking out over Alan Dean Foster novelizations!! I've always loved that author and his original work as well as the novelizations. What an awesome thing to have in common.
I wish you would stop breaking up the interviews posted on UA-cam. The auto play feature never plays the second part next and sometimes it seems like it plays the second part of an interview before you find the first half. As much as I don't enjoy Kimmel or Fallon, at least they keep their segments together
Forget autoplay. It works better to start with the intro (the short video that isn't Tooning the News) and go on clicking the next suggested video that appears on the screen when the video is about to end. The one on top. Most of the time, that's the right order (on occasion whoever does the job messes up that order too, but at least you have a better chance that way).
Amazing novelization of a great movie and told you so much more about Cliff Booth's life as well as Rick Dalton. It goes so deep into the Manson Clan as well. I wish he would write a novelization for Django Unchained because there's actually a lot more to that story.
The Star Trek Logs 1-10 by Foster, adapting and expanding the Star Trek Animated series eps as well as James Blish's original Star Trek series adaptations and of course comics, got me into reading. Later favs were Andromeda Strain, Day of the Jackel and Twains Tom Sawyer and Hunkleberry Finn continued my reading habit up to Ellison, Clarke, Bradbury, Heinlein and more.
And yet they don't mention his novelization of The Thing, a movie which they both gush over in the next segment. Maybe they did talk about it and it was cut out for time or something.
I haven't read a ton of movie novelizations, but have read game novelizations. Especially the Resident Evil and Mass Effect books. The Mass effects one's gives you sooo much insight into the characters and the plot between the first three games.
I've read a few of the RE ones. If you really want to experience something to make you scratch your head, get the Metal Gear Solid novelizations. Snake is completely different in it. The author turned him into Roger Moore-era Bond
Are the Mass Effect books not different stories set between the games though? That's not really a novelisation, that's a continuation book which is a different thing. A novelisation is a book that directly adapts a story from another medium.
@@gothamite27 True. But then again Tarantino stated that he wrote stuff into the novel that wouldn't fit into the movie. Plus he talks about the novels that Alan Dean Foster wrote - some of those are more continuations of the movies, like some of the Star Wars novels he's written. But yeah, I guess it's a matter of interpretation.
@@MsBlackdeath13 Most of the best novelisations have tons of extra supplementary material that either was deleted from the final cut of the film or was added in by the author of the novel to add more insight or to make sense of plotholes etc. Still a different thing to stuff like Splinter of the Minds Eye or the Thrawn Trilogy which are continuations.
First adult novel I ever read was a novelization of Robocop 2. When I hit my first "fuck" about a page or two in, the book held special, secret, rebellious place in my little heart, as well as the very back of my Dahl-filled bookshelf where my parents would never find it.
Love Tarantino. I don’t think he messed up with once upon a time in Hollywood. However not the strongest line up in his movie lineup. My only criticism for that movie was that it was way too long albeit a great pay off ending and good amount of characters filling up the close to 3 hour runtime
I totally didn’t get it, it felt like an inside Hollywood joke that passed me by with an elderly Brad Pitt that totally distracted from anything that could have been a story that i didn’t notice.
I went with a friend and got a lot more from it than she did just from knowing some of the Manson and Sharon Tate history before hand. I'm sure I missed plenty of other references too, but that knowledge definitely gave me more appreciation for the movie. His ode to old Hollywood
I found one of my fav writers as a kid due to novelizations. I read a novelization of the Batman movie that had a cleverer than usual flair to it, and looked up the author, Craig Shaw Gardner, and found he had a couple of great little series under his belt. The Ebenezum/Wuntvor trilogies, and the Cineverse Cycle, specifically
I would like for Quentin Tarentino to direct a movie with Robert Deniro and Harrison Ford, and then, I would like them all to be on for the interview just to see how much of an interview Tarentino can carry,
I can't wait to read Tarantino's novel, it must have incredible stories about the history of cinema that Quentin knows it better than anybody. Furthermore, I'd like Christoph Waltz to be back to work with Tarantino again especially, in his last movie.
After first seeing it I thought it was a work of genius, but when I realized it would have meant nothing to anyone unfamiliar with the story around Helter Skelter and Charlie Manson and his acolytes, the movie reappeared near the top of my list of "Movies Made By People Saluting Other Movies." Still genius, but not significant.
I read the novelizations of the Halo games when Bungie used to do it. It opened my eyes to a larger world of that game and fleshed out more the characters from that game. Novelizations are awesome!
Has anyone here read a novelization of anything? I think writing the novelization of your own film is hilarious. First one I read I was a kid, it was a novelization of Willow from the early 90s.
He novelized Once upon a time in hollywood about a half a year ago. He was on Kimmel awhile back must not be selling well or to keep him in mind for his latest and supposedly last movie.
No the book did great, this is now the hard cover version which includes new stuff! It was always his plan to release that version later, after letting the paperback version gestate
My favorite author. He creates characters that stay with you, long after his movie is over. His books contain sooo many scenes not in his films. Background stories in OUTHollywood are fleshed out in the book. Fun to read. Tarantino is a mad, passionate, wonderful creative Genius.
When I watched "from dusk to dawn" for the first time, I did not understand why this character was needed? It makes no sense, there are no problems like other characters, he is superfluous there. Could other characters' problems be perceived differently compared to Quentin's character? Until now, it seems to me that this was an extra character 🤔✌️
Awful how Colbert had to cut QT off to take a break at the end of this clip. Quentin was rolling, you don't cut someone off when they're rolling like that!!
And Stephen Colbert complements them equally well. By Stephen Colbert I mean Stephen Colbert, not Stephen Colbert the one whose guests greet him, but the Stephen Colbert who welcomes his guests on the Stephen Colbert show. Stephen Colbert.
For anyone wondering, i don't believe Stephen cut him off. The final scene was probably shot at the very end of the interview. Watch the Conan interview at the start of the pandemic, they show those shooting at the end.
Love how you don’t ever really need to ask Tarantino a question.
I can't say that's a "lovable" characteristic.
@@A_M_Bobb Well for a talk show it’s perfect lol. Makes his job much easier.
@@A_M_Bobb passion is awkward most times
This interview is why late night is dying. Right when Quentin got into a groove, Colbert had to cut him off for a commercial break 🙈
yeah wtf was that ? Seemed like he didn't want him talk about it at all for some reason ... kinda odd
It was an editing cut. There is a continuity error at the end. Quinton is not holding a cup then suddenly he has it full grasp. Ipso facto, there is a full interview somewhere without him getting cut off.
I think it was a joke that flopped. Stephen was asking why he had so much more material than could fit in the movie. Quentin was explaining time constraints. Stephen cut him off, for a time constraint. F*ing hilarious, perfect timing, straight-faced. And not even a giggle in the crowd.
@@AWINZLER ahhhh totally went over my head ... but I would honestly still rather have listened to the rest of the story
Yes, and the worst part is - even if Tarantino continued his thoughts after the interruption, the next clip wasn't uploaded. The other clip is about another part of the conversation. I was SO into Tarantinos story here. Even though I respect Colbert a lot as an interviewer, this is a bummer.
I love how Tarantino talks about how he has all this extra material for a great movie that he had to cut because of time (very understandably) and is immediately cut off by a commerical as he is about to get into the groove. What a moment
Quentin is like a human version of IMDB
Lmao yup
Totally 😂😂😂😂😂
Agreed!!!!!
IMQT
Nah, his takes on movies aren’t nearly that inarticulate and annoying.
Now why am I not surprised that he has feet on the cover of his book!!!
@@FlameOnTheBeat his final movie will be 2 hours , nothing but feet.
Tarantino is just as intense now as he ever was. And I dig it.
Cocaine's a hell of a drug.
Sleeps - Tarantin0
Wakes - Tarantin1
You rarely meet someone who is as passionate about his art as this guy.
And so full of himself. Gimme the modest ones.
@@palmereldritch7777 He knew he was born to make movies. confidence & passion
@@brysonlozano7 I'm fine with that more power t him, and i absolutely admire SOME of his movies (Reservoir Dogs, Pulp fiction, Jackie Brown). His recent output a bit less - Kill Bill, Deathproof, Inglorious Basterds, DjangoUnchained, Hateful Eight, ONce Upon a Time - and not going in the right direction.
Too much self indulgent dialogue scenes which aren't as crisp as in Pulp or Dogs. Hateful Eight - pfftshould have been a Broadway play - instead of a static 1 set (which they took a good half hour before reaching the one set they used) non-action action movie - even as a one set thriller movie - it just wasn't thrilling enough, cause they bored you to death with the tangents of dialogue.
2 -Too many self indulgent "hommages" to his well of inspiration (the b movies). While I love his choices of giving cameo's and roles to underused icons, actors from days past - who all well deserve it) - frequently the "homage" as for example in the endless fights of Kill Bill 1 make you nostalgic for the better and better balanced originals, who achieved a greater effect on a pittance of a Tarantino budget and a pittance of the technical means. His love is genuine for these movies, but too many homages/citations which fail to live up to the original - and he ends up with very little or too little that he brings himself to the table. The snowfight in Kill bill for example. I'd say just go watch the original Lady Snowblood and i have a sneaking suspicion Tarantino would agree with me.
Thirdly self indulgent length of the movies and increasingly less smart "twists/ideas".
The once upon a time idea might have been charming at 75 minutes length in a sleek, lean B-movie - but at 3hours or so it becomes an unending monster with a meagre outcome.
And yeah, he's a bit full of himself (which has nothing to with his qualities as a filmmaker) - but....bit of self reflection..
I was not prepared for how much I was going to enjoy "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood." It was terrific. It dropped me right into my childhood of barely remembered tv news stories: Manson family trials, Vietnam war, and Patty Hearst.
Quentin's passion about the past is so awesome. We need to savor this great while we still have him ❤️
I’ve just become a Quentin Tarrantino fan. I didn’t get it until now. He’s fantastic! Pure joy!
Search youtube for videos with him discussing films (not his own) at length - its just so mesmerizing listening to his great passion!
Quentin, my love, come back to us. Maketh of the film again!
He’s such a unique wide-open faucet of a person, he could be on the spectrum for all we know which would almost better explain his genius and level of intricate elaboration. Truly one of a kind artist and talent.
what spectrum?
@@rerikm p sure he/she is referring to autism... :(
I’d bet my last dime he’s on the spectrum.
@@bernardlindeman739 Why the sad face? Autism isn’t some kind of terrible illness.
He’s a lot like Martin Scorcese
I love how Tarantino just goes straight into a long riff on novelisations and old movies 75% of the audience has never heard of, love him :D
He's a movie geek who happen to make movies
@@8draco8 my point is more that other guests will tailor their stories and replies to network late night shows, but Tarantino doesn't
@@NagasakiBladers nah, many guests just pops in talking about nothing even if they supposed to promote something, especially SNL people.
@@8draco8 I didn't mean it that way but it's fine
"W.W. and the Dixie Dance Kings" is a Drive-in / Second feature staple with Burt Reynolds, Art Carney and Jerry Reed. It was also directed by John G Alvidsen, who would direct "Rocky" the following year and "The Karate kid" after that.
2 bags of buttered popcorn are required when you watch this classic.
If you tied Tarantino's hands to his back and asked him to talk, he'd die.
One thing about novelizations is that it enables the youngins (8 year old me, for example) to "see", or experience, movies that he would not be able to see (like Alien, Friday the 13th, etc...). It represents freedom for the little ones. Another great thing about novelizations is that they often include additional or modified scenes from the movie as well as providing internal monologues that explain certain things that the movie's actor or director could not provide for a variety of reason (often lack of skill).
You're eight years old and you want to watch Alien or Friday the 13th?
OK, I agree, reading the novelization conveys all the essence of these films, and allows you to use your imagination to provide the vision.
But--given that you can read and are interested in reading--there are a thousand greater things for you to read than any of these novelizations. There are actual novels. Written by men and women from many different countries for the last five hundred years. At least just try some of these.
My kid is 7, I forced him to watch Texas Chainsaw Massacre
Watching Tarantino talk about "spinner racks" takes me back to Devonshire Drugstore in DET, and Stephen's rapturous stare makes me realize we 3 are part of a certain "American" generation
I really need the full version of this interview
Reminder: Tarantino does _not_ need you to tell him how effing good his coffee is.
He already knows how good his coffee is because he buys it. Apparently, Bonnie doesn't buy the good stuff. Shame on you, Bonnie....
He apparently also doesn’t have to tell you how much he loves feet…
But one thing he does need to tell you is that you look like a couple of dorks.
That was Jimmie Dimmick.
Also his garage, would it be storage of some kind? Perhaps a deceased members of the African American descent?
Love this Novel of Once Upon A Time… in Hollywood.
Perfect companion to the film.
Deep dive into story lines and characters.
Fun!
U gotta love Tarantino's enthusiasm and just winding him up and watching him go
OMG, I can't believe that they're geeking out over Alan Dean Foster novelizations!! I've always loved that author and his original work as well as the novelizations.
What an awesome thing to have in common.
Like his movies or not, there's something so refreshing hearing someone talk about something they're this passionate about
Looking forward to Aubrey Plaza tomorrow. April is an icon!
Oh look! There's feet on the cover!
Who woulda guessed it?
And pretty ones too!
And there is a stripe of Brad the Pitt in the mirror as well.
Its all there.
He loves him so feet.
i can't with this dude and his love of feet..................
@@Movingmts111 But you can adore boobs, thighs, or asses? He's just a man of culture. We all have something that tickles our pickle.
absolutely love every single one of this dude’s movies…this interview was like watching a manic soliloquy.
A Beautiful*** manic soliloquy
I wish you would stop breaking up the interviews posted on UA-cam. The auto play feature never plays the second part next and sometimes it seems like it plays the second part of an interview before you find the first half. As much as I don't enjoy Kimmel or Fallon, at least they keep their segments together
Forget autoplay. It works better to start with the intro (the short video that isn't Tooning the News) and go on clicking the next suggested video that appears on the screen when the video is about to end. The one on top. Most of the time, that's the right order (on occasion whoever does the job messes up that order too, but at least you have a better chance that way).
Can any of the Jimmys even come close to this eloquently articulated conversation? I think not
Amazing novelization of a great movie and told you so much more about Cliff Booth's life as well as Rick Dalton. It goes so deep into the Manson Clan as well. I wish he would write a novelization for Django Unchained because there's actually a lot more to that story.
Colbert mentions Alan Dean Foster, that’s some serious gourmet movie shit!
The Star Trek Logs 1-10 by Foster, adapting and expanding the Star Trek Animated series eps as well as James Blish's original Star Trek series adaptations and of course comics, got me into reading. Later favs were Andromeda Strain, Day of the Jackel and Twains Tom Sawyer and Hunkleberry Finn continued my reading habit up to Ellison, Clarke, Bradbury, Heinlein and more.
And yet they don't mention his novelization of The Thing, a movie which they both gush over in the next segment. Maybe they did talk about it and it was cut out for time or something.
i could seriously sit and listen to him talk about film and movies for HOURS
I haven't read a ton of movie novelizations, but have read game novelizations.
Especially the Resident Evil and Mass Effect books.
The Mass effects one's gives you sooo much insight into the characters and the plot between the first three games.
I've read a few of the RE ones. If you really want to experience something to make you scratch your head, get the Metal Gear Solid novelizations. Snake is completely different in it. The author turned him into Roger Moore-era Bond
@@gvalo lol. Yeah some of the novelizations are a bit strange.
Are the Mass Effect books not different stories set between the games though? That's not really a novelisation, that's a continuation book which is a different thing. A novelisation is a book that directly adapts a story from another medium.
@@gothamite27 True. But then again Tarantino stated that he wrote stuff into the novel that wouldn't fit into the movie. Plus he talks about the novels that Alan Dean Foster wrote - some of those are more continuations of the movies, like some of the Star Wars novels he's written. But yeah, I guess it's a matter of interpretation.
@@MsBlackdeath13 Most of the best novelisations have tons of extra supplementary material that either was deleted from the final cut of the film or was added in by the author of the novel to add more insight or to make sense of plotholes etc. Still a different thing to stuff like Splinter of the Minds Eye or the Thrawn Trilogy which are continuations.
I love Quentin and his films.
I bought the paperback at Quentin's theater in Beverly Hills (New Beverly Cinema) I smashed all 400 pages on the flight back to Delaware. Soooo good
I want the 3 hour version of once upon a Time in Hollywood! Whatever happened to the Netflix series?
Passion coming out of his ears. Love him.
Favourite director 🙏
"I'M THAT 1 PERSON!" - Q.T.
First adult novel I ever read was a novelization of Robocop 2. When I hit my first "fuck" about a page or two in, the book held special, secret, rebellious place in my little heart, as well as the very back of my Dahl-filled bookshelf where my parents would never find it.
I absolutely love W W and the Dixie Dance Kings! The entire cast is A+.
you can tell he was lowkey disappointed that he had to stop talking for the commercials
yes :)
Would be interesting to see Tarantino’s novels get adapted into movies by new-gen directors
He points out his own applause, classic.
So, "Once upon a time in Hollywood vol 1" and "Once upon a time in Hollywood vol 2" were not considered as an option?
Talented genius! 😊
Love Tarantino. I don’t think he messed up with once upon a time in Hollywood. However not the strongest line up in his movie lineup. My only criticism for that movie was that it was way too long albeit a great pay off ending and good amount of characters filling up the close to 3 hour runtime
I totally didn’t get it, it felt like an inside Hollywood joke that passed me by with an elderly Brad Pitt that totally distracted from anything that could have been a story that i didn’t notice.
I rate it right up there. I felt the film's length was just right. Especially given the scope of the narrative.
I went with a friend and got a lot more from it than she did just from knowing some of the Manson and Sharon Tate history before hand. I'm sure I missed plenty of other references too, but that knowledge definitely gave me more appreciation for the movie. His ode to old Hollywood
Loving the OUTIH novel ... Movie makes so much sense after reading it 🤩
I kinda wanna hear about Tarantino's future use of guns in his movies with regards to the Baldwin incident.
Love his films.🙂👍🏾👍🏾
I found one of my fav writers as a kid due to novelizations. I read a novelization of the Batman movie that had a cleverer than usual flair to it, and looked up the author, Craig Shaw Gardner, and found he had a couple of great little series under his belt.
The Ebenezum/Wuntvor trilogies, and the Cineverse Cycle, specifically
I read that Batman when the movie came out. You’re right, it was great. I’ll check out his other work
#LateShow
#HailTarantinoForever!!!
#RespectNovelizations.
#KnowWhatYouIntended.
#FunDoesOne!!!
I would like for Quentin Tarentino to direct a movie with Robert Deniro and Harrison Ford, and then, I would like them all to be on for the interview just to see how much of an interview Tarentino can carry,
I can't wait to read Tarantino's novel, it must have incredible stories about the history of cinema that Quentin knows it better than anybody. Furthermore, I'd like Christoph Waltz to be back to work with Tarantino again especially, in his last movie.
Quentin likes what he likes and he made a lot of people like the same thing as he does.
*Maybe* Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is one of the best movies ever but it is far and away the most satisfying.
After first seeing it I thought it was a work of genius, but when I realized it would have meant nothing to anyone unfamiliar with the story around Helter Skelter and Charlie Manson and his acolytes, the movie reappeared near the top of my list of "Movies Made By People Saluting Other Movies." Still genius, but not significant.
Quentin the odball of pop culter in the West - every one has to respect him for his movies
I read the novelizations of the Halo games when Bungie used to do it. It opened my eyes to a larger world of that game and fleshed out more the characters from that game. Novelizations are awesome!
As well as the Assassin's Creed series
Tarantino needs a tv series before he is done.
Yes! He's a single dad, with five daughters aged 6-15. I'd pay to watch that.
He's talked about doing a "Bounty Law" series for Netflix since he had a good time working with them on the extended "Hateful Eight" edition.
What an amusing voice he has.
Tarantino and Tracy Morgan on the same interview would be entertaining
He became Tent in Quarantino when Covid hit
I want Tarantino and John Waters to team up.
Yes !
Too much of a challenge for Quentin.
The book is great. If you enjoyed the movie, it really is good companion read
He makes ok movies.
That's a great subjective opinion.
Legend
I read the novel and it was great. It was similar to the film and not. It was a fun read even if you had seen the film.
Has anyone here read a novelization of anything? I think writing the novelization of your own film is hilarious. First one I read I was a kid, it was a novelization of Willow from the early 90s.
Tarantino did Bruce Lee dirty in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
I disagree
Aaanndd, congratulations, two people CARE!
if I've read a story first the movie "so far" has been a letdown. Foundation is a great example of that.
Nice shoutout to Alan Dean Foster 😄
Damn. Our boy Colbert did a commercial break while Quentin was talking.
I can imagine him reacting to that Thomas Rickman interview like that Leo gif from Once Upon A Time...
I sent this to Alan Dean Foster ---"the king of novelisations!"
Bill and Teds Bogus Journey's novelization got me started, then Quantum Leap.
Is he always this hyped? I wish I had half his energy.
What is that one thing that Tarantino loves even more than women's feet? A double feeture.
Talking.
He’s got the chops man
That cut off hurt deep.
tarantinos hands are wild!
My first novelisation was Magnum Force.
He novelized Once upon a time in hollywood about a half a year ago. He was on Kimmel awhile back must not be selling well or to keep him in mind for his latest and supposedly last movie.
No the book did great, this is now the hard cover version which includes new stuff! It was always his plan to release that version later, after letting the paperback version gestate
GO QT~
i think the movie is about the de-glamourisation of hollywood...the nonsense, emptiness and sadness after all the spectacle
he was born to make movies
The first novelization I bought was Encino Man. This is not a joke.
My favorite author. He creates characters that stay with you, long after his movie is over.
His books contain sooo many scenes not in his films.
Background stories in OUTHollywood are fleshed out in the book. Fun to read.
Tarantino is a mad, passionate, wonderful creative Genius.
Tarantino is a filmmaking machine. How does one person hold so much movie knowledge and creativity
When I watched "from dusk to dawn" for the first time, I did not understand why this character was needed? It makes no sense, there are no problems like other characters, he is superfluous there. Could other characters' problems be perceived differently compared to Quentin's character? Until now, it seems to me that this was an extra character 🤔✌️
Sweet
Awful how Colbert had to cut QT off to take a break at the end of this clip. Quentin was rolling, you don't cut someone off when they're rolling like that!!
That book cover has them feet
Hot take: Tarantino is the Neil deGrasse Tyson of film.
And Stephen Colbert complements them equally well. By Stephen Colbert I mean Stephen Colbert, not Stephen Colbert the one whose guests greet him, but the Stephen Colbert who welcomes his guests on the Stephen Colbert show. Stephen Colbert.
Foot fetishes !!!
For anyone wondering, i don't believe Stephen cut him off. The final scene was probably shot at the very end of the interview.
Watch the Conan interview at the start of the pandemic, they show those shooting at the end.
And Quinten is probably playing along cos he loves film making
The more I look at him, the more he looks like McLeach from The Rescuers Down Under.
What happened to the V sign?
well, this explains a lot...
they already did this interview last time
Why are these shows still on? Right when Tarantino is on roll they interrupt him to go to commercial?
I thought you couldn't get top-notch Peruvian flake anymore? (-;
I never knew Tarantino was so annoying. I can't help but appreciate how passionate he is.