Panasonic LX100 II vs Panasonic GX9 - Differences and Similarities
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 гру 2018
- Panasonic LX100 II vs Panasonic GX9 - Differences and Similarities
Panasonic LX100 II - amzn.to/2L3avjb
Panasonic GX9 - amzn.to/2BHqvos
Luminar 3 - bit.ly/SkylumLuminar2018 CODE: THS10
Lenses:
Panasonic Leica 50-200mm F2.8-4.0 - amzn.to/2w0XjEu
Panasonic Leica 12-60mm F2.8-4.0 - amzn.to/2AXOb3Y
Panasonic Leica 8-18mm F2.8-4.0 - amzn.to/2u27Dvx
Panasonic 20mm F1.7 II ASPH - amzn.to/2G6FSJG
Panasonic Leica 200mm F2.8 - amzn.to/2woCyDQ
Shot on:
Sony A7 III - amzn.to/2P5nzVT
Nikon Z6 - amzn.to/2rL00br
More videos:
Panasonic GX9 Review in Sardinia, Italy
bit.ly/PanasonicGX9review
Panasonic LX100 II Review - One of a Kind
bit.ly/LX100IIreview
Panasonic Leica 50-200mm F/2.8-4.0 ASPH Review with Panasonic G9
bit.ly/Leica50-200
Panasonic Leica 8-18mm F2.8-4 Review with Panasonic G9 and GX9
bit.ly/Leica8-18
Panasonic Leica DG 200mm f/2.8 Review with Panasonic G9
bit.ly/Leica200mm
Panasonic Leica 12-60mm F2.8-4.0 vs Lumix 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 on Panasonic G9
bit.ly/leicavslumix - Наука та технологія
![Fujifilm X-T30 vs Panasonic GX9 - Great Travel Cameras [ Fuji XT30 vs GX9 ]](/img/n.gif)
*Panasonic GX9* review: bit.ly/PanasonicGX9review
*Panasonic LX100 II* review: bit.ly/LX100IIreview
Pictures were edited in *Luminar 3* - bit.ly/SkylumLuminar2018 $/€10 off code: *THS10*
Thank you for all your videos this year all your reviews tell all I need. Have a happy new year and I look forward to your videos in 2019.
Thank you, all the best to you in 2019 as well!
Thank you for your broad comparisons and explanations. I apprecaite all your information very much. Please keep posting your reviews. You do a great job.
Thank you, I will do my best to keep it up!
Much as I enjoyed the comparison (because I muddle through the same question all of the time), I arrive with a different conclusion because my premise does not require an exclusive result. What that means is, when you have irreconcilable priorities, you get the best of both worlds by choosing two cameras. Most of the time you know your scenario and go out the door with one camera. As is, the Micro FourThirds system is more hugely portable than any other camera system. I typically carry 6 lenses and camera in a more or less purse-sized, soft bag. If I had more gold, I might choose three cameras, the PRO end of MFT, the small end, and an LX100 or II, always in the mix, because the aperture / shutter options plus the flexibility of the controls are two stops ahead and several controls more numerous than anything in the too-small one-inch category. The LX100 type is a lone "tweener" type because the cameras do the most important parts of MFT with a bright, small, fixed lens. In sum, this comparison is admittedly apples and oranges (agreeing with the author), and the most interesting comparison might have been the GX85 with the 12-32mm zoom only. If you bring in the rest of the system and multiple lenses, it's not really fair, and you would do just as well to consider all of the MFT cameras if you are the one-camera, system type.
Thank you very much, your video was very useful, as I have been thinking of buying one of these Panasonic cameras, or perhaps the older GX85 with the 2 kit lenses.
Amazing shots from Bratislava! Thank you also for the information.
Thank you for your review. I agree with your choice of the GX9 for your photo use. I have a GX9, and was thinking about buying a LX100 II. However; after your review, I'll just stick with my GX9. I use the GX9 in New York City for people photography. I keep the Leica 15mm, F1.7 lens onthe camera all the time (30mm equivalent in 35mm) I find it excellent for this use. The focus is fast and I get great results. I appreciate your information, along with your pictures.
A great informative video as always..have just opted for the GX800 (even more compact) specifically for take everywhere and to use mainly with 20mm f1.7...was on a special deal here in uk including the 12-32mm!..another lens that looks very interesting and would love to know if you have plans to review is the new sigma 56mm f1.4 for micro 43...seen quite a few reviews for sony but hardly any for micro 43....hope you have a fab 2019!
Thank you, have a lot of fun with your GX80, all the best to you as well!
Happy new year!! You´re on "Camera Conspiracies" top ten list again.
Thank you for letting me know, happy new year to you as well!
Very helpful and informative video as usual. Thanks for doing this comparison.
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Thanks for the indepth comparison. I learned that the 4K crop factor can be compensated by a wider angle lens. Thank you for mentioning that.
Hello from Mongolia my friend. I hope you have a happy new year. Best wishes for 2019.
Hello, thank you and all the best in 2019 to you as well!
3:10 "which one you prefer is a matter of preference"
Good point. ;-)
Yes in all aspects of the camera for all brands! Most guys in shop try to push Canon.
Nice and real objective review. Thx! Stay healthy.
Very good comparison. I own the original LX100 and the GX9. The latter received way too much hate because it wasn't a "true GX8 successor", although it is such an incredible camera. In my opinion, it is among the best, if not the best, M43 body below 1000$/€, given it shares the same sensor with the G9. If only it had a mic jack as well...
Thank you, the reactions probably would have been better if it was called GX95 / GX90 but I agree that it is a great camera.
Hello my friend. I hope you have a happy new year. Best wishes for 2019.
Thank you very much, best wishes to you as well!
Another great review. Nice. I bought the GX-9 when it first came out and then returned it because it felt to light and a bit cheap to me, but I am beginning to regret it. I think it may be the best choice out there for an all-rounder. The only other camera that fills this niche (smallish, tilt/touch, large-ish sensor, and not to forget - a decent menu system) is the Fujifilm X-t20, but I just don't like how it looks! Maybe a few more months of waiting will turn up a Fuji X100G with tilt screen...but I doubt it.
Thank you, I personally like both looks and feel of the GX9, but that is probably individual.
Excellent overall review as usual. Your decision making points at the end are spot on and totally relevant. I personally have gotten to the point that a tilt screen is a necessity for street shooting so I would go with the GX9. Also, like yourself, I also own 4 panasonic m4/3 lens and so I already have an investment in the Panasonic ILC system already. Having said that, IF the LX100mk2 had a tilt screen, which in my opinion is entirely technically feasible even in the LX physical format, I would buy two of them right now. Thanks for your time and effort, as always I look forward to your unique view of the camera world. Regards
Thank you, it is always about compromises, Panasonic offers quite a lot of options, but unfortunately it is not possible to make the perfect package that would suit everyones needs.
@@TheHybridShooter I agree. The GX9 is a great camera. So is the LX100mk2. And so are most of the cameras released in the last two years or so. For me it is a matter of getting out there and shooting more photos. Keep up the reviews, I really appreciate it.
I agree with that, will do my best to keep it up!
Świetne porównanie, tzn. super comparision! 2thumbs up_
Dziękuję bardzo!
Hi The Hybrid Shooter, thank you so much for the review.
I got 1" sensor panasonic LX10 for my first camera .I am very happy with that. But then , after around 1 year later , i would like to have a bigger sensor camera which still portable. Gx85 / Gx9 seems something i really looking for(And i like panasonic) , also the new fuji film X-T30 looks cool. Do you have any recommend on them? I prefer it can also have good video quality. Thank you so much.
If you need mic input and no-crop video, X-T30 would be better, but it doesn't have stabilized sensor. G85 is also still quite small and great all-round camera.
Great review. Is Leica d-Lux 7 exactly same as lx100 ii with only different body style?
Yes, it is basically the same camera.
Nice video, please make a video about color correction on sony a6500/a6300 footage pleass
Thank you, I have already done that: bit.ly/sonygrading
another great video! One question, i'm going to buy gx9. at same focal lenght do you prefer color and quality of 12-35 2.8 ii or panaleica 12-60? 🙏🙏
Thank you, I much prefer optical character of Leica 12-60.
That's my struggle. It would be my first camera, I don't know if better walking with one zoom or have 2 sharper lens
Great video! How is the HD video quality at 60fps? Is it similar to the 24/25fps HD quality, which I agree is pretty good?
Thank you, it is basically the same as with 24 / 25 fps.
@@TheHybridShooter Thank you for your awesome content!
You're welcome, thank you for watching!
Hello my friend. I really like your videos! I own the GX8 at the moment but i don't like video image stabilisation. I'm looking to upgrade to a G9 or a GX9 but i can't choose. The reason that i go for the G9 is because i don't like the size of the G9, i'm more of a rangefinder style guy. I can live with the GX9 tilt screen but i hear everybody say that de viewfinder is really bad. Is it really that bad? I wear glasses and i love the viewfinder on the GX8. I got a leica 12-60 and a leica 15mm f1.7 lens. Is the video stabilisation on the GX9 that much better than the gx8? Is the stabilisation almost as good as the G9's? I hope to hear from you. Thanks for making these really good videos!
The viewfinder on GX9 is not great, but still usable. Stabilization on GX9 is better than on GX9 but G9 has much better IBIS.
I'm enjoying the GX9 as well. I love the IBIS!
So do I!
so do I too! @@TheHybridShooter
Nice comparison! Would be a tough choice!
Thank you!
Happy New Year 2019!
I have a G9 now and it’s great but also little big/heavy and I try to evaluate if I keep it and get used to the size and enjoy it’s performance or try GX9 and accept its limitation and go more for 1080p and internal mic or external mic like Zoom H1 or instamic.
I understand that GX9 4K video AF is not very fast and reliable and it has no mic in.
Is GX9 1080p Video AF as reliable as G9 ? Or is that still not good for moving objects like kids for example? How is the internal mic audio ?
I try to understand if GX9 can work as a smaller hybrid camera than G9 or if it’s just for stills recommended. But then I think GX9 will also need a separate bag and does not fit in a jacket pocket anyway so maybe the size discussion is more a theoretical nature and not worth this trade off.
Since you have both could you please give your perspective to this?
Happy new year to you as well! GX9 is definitely not as all-round usable as the G9, if you shoot a lot of vide, G9 is much better option and I would probably choose G85 instead of GX9 for hybrid use.
Thank you @@TheHybridShooter. I would say Video is similar important even though i can exactly define the ratio stills/video, maybe 60/40.
I watched also your G85-G9 review and out of that the G9 wins and portability due to size/weight does not seem to be a significant factor. Hope that´s correct understood from my side so tends more to boil down to G9.
@@mvhan911 If you can live with the size of the G9, it is definitely the most capable camera out of these.
I have the LX100 and so much want to upgrade to the Mk 2, but it's not yet available in Cambodia where I live. I'm proudly amateur, and don't want to bother with extra lenses, so it's the perfect camera for me.
It is very good choice for advanced amateurs, hopefully it will be available soon.
I already have a Ricoh GR III... how do you feel about the LX100Mk2 in 2020 to compliment the GR? The Fuji X70 prices have gone nuts. I really like the external controls. For an ILC I'm leaning to Sony A6600/A7C/A7iii etc... Will appreciate your thoughts. For travel and street photography. I often shoot in low light situations with high dynamic range between highlights and shadows so with highlights correctly exposed I value ability to recover details from shadows with low noise.
If you need to recover a lot of shadows, I would go at least with APS-C, ideally full frame. The AF in low light also not great with Panasonic.
I have the Panasonic g85 what lens should I buy for Video recording? Love the videos.
Depends on the budget and usage.
I can’t decide between the GX85 and the GX9. The GX85/80 is cheaper and is said to have the same internals as the G85/80 except the obvious physical differences and weather sealing. But then the GX9 is newer and more up to date but $350 more than the GX85/80.
So my question is what would you recommend? I want a rangefinder style camera as it’ll be easier to have on me at all times compared to my bigger G9. I love the G9 but it’s a bit big to have on me at all times.
Thanks if you reply and keep up the quality videos!
If you budget requires it, GX9 is significantly better camera, mostly because of the new sensor and IMO it is worth the extra price if budget allows, if not, GX85 / GX80 is still very good camera.
What do you think about image stabilization in LX100 II? Is it stabil enough to take some vlogging, walking around, in 1080p?
Yes, it is good enough.
Great vid!
Thank you!
Hello Hybrid Shooter!!
I have GX9, and am deciding whether to get 12-60/2.8-4.0 for my travel to Russia, but the combo is quite big for me to walk around 10 hours a day.. Suddenly, I think of LX 100 ii.. Do you think it's a better choice for travelling especially in the city?.. Do you find dust problem during the time of use? Thank you very much..
Hi, personally I definitely prefer GX9 + 12-60mm F2.8 over LX100 II. It is still a small setup. Dust issues should be fixed in mark II version on LX100.
I like Panasonic compacts but I already have had 2 compacts that the dust gets in the sensor then that's the end of the camera
Happen to my TZ7 what a camera that was! Built well unlike the newer ones.
I think it’s worth mentioning that another difference between these cameras is that the lens on the LX100 is unique and not otherwise available. If I could buy an interchangeable stabilized 10.9-34 1.7-2.8 for MFT with the same size I surely would. What an amazing pairing with the gx9 that would be.
That lens is so small because of the multi aspect ratio. It is not large enough to cover whole M43 so there is basically additional crop. F1.7 on LX100 is a bit different than F1.7 on GX9.
Sure but the effective sensor size is only 15% smaller while a 12-35 2.8 is 200% longer and totally not pocketable. My point is only that they are roughly compatible in performance but the lx is unique in providing an MFT 12-35 in a much smaller package.
A part of the whole lens is inside the camera body and have to build up before ready to use.
In MFT terms, the lens would be a 12-37mm F1.9-3.1 which is quite impressive.
Absolutely. I bought a used LX100 mark I a couple of years ago and it's about to accompany me on a trip to Christmas markets primarily because of that fast zoom lens. The 12-35 f/2.8 on a GX body is a much heavier and bulkier solution and is still about one stop slower through most of its (smaller) zoom range
Hello!. I really appreciate the video, it is well documented and seems to be based on experience. However, there is one fact that surprises me and although I have searched the web, I cannot reach a decision: The fixed objective of the LX100mII is a large aperture, with f / 1.7, and yet the interchangeable objectives of the GX9 start from f / 3.5, but they are usually appreciated as good optical lenses (of course this applies to any lens, I particularize it for these models). So why can a less luminous interchangeable lens be preferred to a fixed one with several brighter steps? Both cameras being equivalent sensors, there is surely a reasonable explanation, but I am not able to understand it. Another example, the Panasonic TZ100 / SZ100 has a 25/250 focal range with a maximum aperture of f 2.8, and I still read reviews calling it "dark" compared to the Lumix LX10 / 15, which opens at f 1.4. Why is the TZ100's f2.8 dark while an interchangeable lens with f 3.5 is acceptable? I would greatly appreciate your expert response. Greetings from Spain.
That is because the sensor size and resulting crop factor is different. If you want to directly compare these cameras, you need to find out the crop factor a compare "full frame equivalents".
I have both of these cameras and like both. My only wish is a camera exactly like the LX100 Mk2 but with the ability of interchangeable lenses.
That is not possible due to specific construction of the LX100 II, GX9 is the closest thing.
Great video. Could you do a comparison video between the Panasonic G80/85 vs the GX9 please? They're roughly the same price, and even though the body styles are quite different the feature sets are similar and both have their own strengths over the other. I think it'd make for an interesting video.
Thank you! I will try to do that, although I'm not sure when, since I don't have G85 at my disposal at the moment.
Good suggestion 👍
Hi I have both the GX9 and the G80 and as image quality goes there is little difference even with the sensor size variance between them
For me I find myself having both cameras in my bag but always seem to favour the G80 which I find more comfortable to hold as having a far better grip and of course the better rear screen option as well as better control dials (IMHO) also the G80 is not that much bigger than the GX9 so no real benefit there either to use it
So as you can tell for me G80 is the camera I would recommend and in 2019 I will be trading in my GX9 towards a G9 which I am sure will soon be my favourite
G80 is more usable all-round camera, but the difference in image quality is significant according to my experiences.
The Hybrid Shooter The Hybrid Shooter I would be really keen to see those differences - a lot of people seem to suggest the 16mpx sensor (without OLPF) isn’t much different to the 20mpx sensor in terms of output. Can’t seem to find a reliable video online that compares the GX9 to the G80/85 though so I could be completely wrong there!
Thumbs up, good info.
Thank you!
Which has better IBIS (not including optical)? What about compared to gx85/gx80? I am looking for the best IBIS in the smallest package for low light. I had the lx10 before with 1" sensor. The IBIS was nonexistent it was so jerky. And the focus in low light was really bad. Have they significantly improved since then? Or was it just an lx10 problem?
There is no IBIS LX100 II or any other fixed lens cameras. Those use lens stabilization.
@@TheHybridShooter well then lens stabilization for the lx100 ii then. How does it compare to gx85 and gx9?
It doesn't mean that it is worse, important is how effective it is the stabilization, not what type of stabilization it is.
Hi there, would it be possible to review Panasonic 14-140 as a single travel lens option?
I will try to do that in the future.
An important question for me is how bad the viewfinder is in gx9? It's usable? I;m close to buy this camera, but worry about viewfinder quality.
You can see it in the video. It is usable, but there are better viewfinders out there.
It is the sole reason that I stuck with my gx8. That evf is so useful and friendly to my eyesight that I simply cannot go backwards to what the gx9 is offering.
What watches is that?
Hi, any plans on reviewing Sony rx 100 vi?
Probably not, sorry about that.
1 D Lux 7
1 GX9 + 12mm 1.4
1 GX9 + 12-60 Leica
Fuji X100F
Fuji XE3 + 16 2.8/16-80
Which is better for the only camera?
GX9 + Leica 12-60
Hi friend, I've heard that Panasonic LX100 II has some dust problem inside the body, on the sensor, and is not possible to clean by yourself. Is it true? Thanks
I only had it for 2 weeks, so I can't answer that.
I think i might choose both - is that an ideal compromise or over-indulgence ?
Probably not, if you want to buy two Panasonic cameras, something like LX100 II and G9 or GH5 would be better combination. GX9 and LX100 II are too similar.
I currently own two G9s (each paired with a different f2.8-4 zoom lens) and an lx100 original - i was thinking of swapping out one of the G9s for a GX9 to increase versatility and use with a prime lens for daily/street shooting . I thought that made sense without losing out on quality . Your opinion on that ?@@TheHybridShooter
That might be a good idea, GX9 is smaller, you can use it with the same lenses and it is great B-camera for the G9.
thanks for that - i thought it would be a good idea too so i'm doing the swap today ! The next question is - do i upgrade to the lx100 mkii ?@@TheHybridShooter
@@micwarmington1 I would say that there is quite big difference between mark I and mark II, you will also get the same processing as on the GX9 and G9, so if the budget allows it... why not.
Please can you explain by what you mean when you say that "Both of these cameras look vintage, which is important with these types of cameras" Can you set out what are the importances about looking vintage for these cameras as I am not able to understand what a vintage look ha s to do with anything, and why is it so important with these two particular cameras? Is a vintage look unimportant with other types of camera? I must be missing something here as I am a bit lost.
It is mostly subjective, so I can't really explain that, it just reminds me of old rangefinders. The reason why I think that the design is import with this type of camera is that it is meant for street and travel shooting so it should also be a nice fashion accessory.
fajne videjko. len tak ďalej :-)
Ďakujem pekne!
Hello @The Hybrid Shooter, seeing this video for the first time because I am interested in buying Panasonic Lumix LX100 ii. In the past I have held Sony A7Rii, A6400, Panasonic GX85, Fuji X-T2 but have come to realise that I require a small portable camera. I also have the latest mobile phone i.e. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra whose camera is quite good and obviously a handy choice to use anywhere around for both photography and 4K videos (to be shared on Social Media).
LX100ii is 3 years old but having micro 4/3rd sensor should mean its result would still be better than that of Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (phone camera) including for 4K video?
Is it worth investing in this camera (LX100ii) which is portable from weight, size perspective, reasonable zoom plus photo/video results? I don't want to spend too much money, at this stage. I even read that Fuji-Film's X-100V is a very good camera but the limitation is fixed prime lens (when I prefer a zoom due to travel) and the cost is so high that one thinks why not pay a little extra and buy Sony A7C instead.
Also why is LX100ii compared to Sony Cyber-Shot RX100v, RX100vii or Sony ZV-1 when they are only 1" systems? And how come they having a smaller sensor deliver equal/better results than LX100ii?
My ultimate plan is to go back to Full-Frame camera after saving some money and waiting for Sony A7Cii to be launched, in 2022. I liked it due to its form factor (compact) and features.
Thank you.
I don't recommend LX100 II in 2021, something like Sony ZV-1 is much better choice. Sensor in LX100 II always works in crop mode, so it is not a full-featured camera, video is cropped, autofocus is terrible, lens is below average...
I can highly recommend original A7C though, that is a great camera. A7C II will be much more expensive if or when it will be released.
@@TheHybridShooter except ZV-1 doesn't have EVF or dials for manual changes - most stuff has to go through the menu...I think this is why LX100 retains such a high price
@@Jennifer-wr9si If you want to use manual controls, you probably also want better image quality than what LX100 can provide.
@@TheHybridShooter what compact with better image quality you propose? Ricoh gr iii? Sony g1x?
@@wouldoox8024 I have no idea.
off topic question, should i go for g9 or g85 if i'm using g7 right now ? I know that G9 is the better one but the size and price are what i really concern on G9. Do you think that in 2019, Will Panasonic launch new camera on m4/3 system ? or its ok to go on G85 or G9 ? My job is photographer and G7 still not suites for my work especially event and low light condition. Thank you for your opinion.
P.S. I know that fullframe is the better choice but I don't want to carry a rock in my bag . If you still recommend on fullframe then I will reconsider it.
I have a G7, G85 and a G9. If you want to keep your costs and learning time down go with the G85. It has the same layout as the G7 and you can use the same batteries. You get the added benefit of weather sealing and IBIS and virtually no learning curve.
I you are professional photographer, I definitely recommend G9 over G85, it is well worth extra price and weight. Panasonic will mainly focus on full frame in 2019, so I don't think that we will see GH6 or G10. Full frame is more suitable for event photography, although G9 can do it as well and it depends on the lens.
A6500 won't help that much with high ISO, and I don't think that the ergonomics and handling is particularly suitable for professional work + there is no suitable APS-C zoom lens for event photography.
@@ofmetalphilosophy4837 Thinking about that too lean forward to X-T3 but still love m4/3 in terms of lenses size and body which I really enjoy it. Which one you prefer between X-T3 and G9 in overall situations ?
@@thedvsmonkey G85 I really love this because of the size and price same as G7 but I kinda like the overall G9. Which one you like the most between 3 of them ?
Bravo! Beautiful! Homages! ⚡⚡⚡ JAR
How is the GX9 for shutter shock issues - has it been resolved without software?
It has never really been a major issues with GX9.
I'm just wondering, are there any overheating issues on the GX9?
No at all.
@@TheHybridShooter love the camera but I may just have to go with the GX85 instead as it the more affordable option and includes two lens kits as well. I can just upgrade once I become a better photographer.
what do you think of the 14-140?
I have never used one.
if i am choosing between gx9 and g9 (just for photos), is there any major difference? should i pay more for g9 of i can stick with a gx9?
Yeah the G9 is a flagship level full featured camera, it definitely has an edge over the GX9. Just watch the review The Hybrid Shooter did on the G9
Yes, those are completely different cameras, take a look at my G9 review: bit.ly/G9LongTerm
i ve watched it already, i am asking about major difference, as far as i know they both use the same sensor, that's why i'am asking, i know that g9 can shoot amazing vids, but i'am interested only in photos, and also i dont have 1k+ lol, and i need to know, should i save some money for a g9 or i can buy a gx9 right now.
Yes, there are major differences - handling, size, weather sealing, autofocus, battery life, viewfinder ... basically everything expect the sensor.
how about g85 vs gx9, what is better in your opinion?
The lens on both lx100 I and II it's the same quality as the expensive 12-35 f2.8 and it's even faster.
No, that is unfortunately not truth. 12-35mm F2.8 II has much better optical characteristics.
wrong, my friend. you cannot beat physics. its nice compact and fast in the lx100, but cannot match the optical performance of the interchangable lens.
So is the LX100 24-70 1.7 thought the whole range or does it stop down? I believe this is an important question.😁
No, it is F1.7-F2.8
Is the dynamic range really as good as Sony APS-C sensors?
Not quite, but it is pretty close.
I’d choose GX9 with 15mm 1.7 and 42.5mm 1.7
That is indeed great combination.
Ever since shooting a fuji camera for photos, I haven't touched my micro four thirds system.
I do use my g85 with 12-35 and 15mm for video all the time tho
I still use M43 for both (besides other systems) even after trying Fuji.
Ryan Thomas what’s your reason for this ?
Is the stabilization better on gx9 compared to lx 100ii
Not if you use IBIS only, but if you use IBIS + stabilized lens on GX9, it is better.
How is the future looking for M 4/3 ? How come they haven't tried to use a Sony Stacked Exmor R? More light BSI ???
I enjoyed this but changing lenses when filming ( mainly nature and birds) would lead to missing quite a lot and possibly dropping a lens ..Much as I would love think the LX100 II is suited to my needs and hands :) Panasonic are amazing video cameras and even the simplest works wonders ..
Is the body of the gx9 all plastic? Even the top?
It is, but still fees very solid.
The Hybrid Shooter thanks for replying! I think ill be getting one!
@Casper Cheng It is definitely still in production.
Hi can G9 record more then 30 minutes ?
Not out of the box, but there is some hack that can do it.
@@TheHybridShooter need a totorial on that :)
So do I to be honest.
10 minute limit is only in 4K 60p.
@@TheHybridShooter so 4K 30 unlimited and same goes for 1080?
The GX9 looks like it may be a better choice than Ricoh GR3.
I would certainly prefer GX9 with 15mm 1.7 over GR III.
@@TheHybridShooter
Thanks, I like the ability to change lens also.. nice video..
it´s not fair to compare
I think you like m4t more than full frame... you have too many cameras 😂
Depends on what I am doing, there certainly are occasions when I prefer M43. Unfortunately, not all of the cameras that you see on this channel are mine.
The Hybrid Shooter oh... do you rent them? These are amazing reviews btw
Thank you, some of these are review units for journalists.
The Hybrid Shooter oh
By any chance if you could possibly get your hands on the feiyu tech ak2000 and make a review on it pls?
I'm sorry to disappoint but probably not.
I’m surprised to see that LX100 is about the same size as G9 ... If I want really compact, I should go with Ricoh GR III.
It is not about the size of G9.
you rate the 100 as better picture quality for 1 inch. rated at 17MP , but the GX9 is 20.3 mp. Why is the lesser MP camera of 17mp better picture quality. I am a novice trying to learn try to understand.. Thanks
No, I don’t. GX9 is not a 1” camera.
iso 3400...