5 reasons to get Lumix LX100II
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 сер 2024
- I'm going to give you five good reasons to choose the Panasonic Lumix LX100II, if you are looking to buy a premium compact camera.
If you found this useful, buy me a coffee and that keeps me making more useful videos:
www.buymeacoffee.com/sulantoblog
My name is Matti Sulanto, I'm a photographer and a Lumix ambassador based in Helsinki Finland. I'll publish a new video every Tuesday and Friday.
My Instagram: / sulantoblog
My website: sulanto.fi
I only need one reason to get this Lumix: Micro Four Thirds. The fact that I can get that sensor in a compact digital camera is definitely a big win for Panasonic.
I love the user experience with this camera. Usually it is only Fuji that gets this so right. There is something very special about a camera that just feels so good when shooting.
and that was all I needed to hear to make up my mind to get one ...
I purchased this camera several months ago to use for indiscrete street photography. It's really an amazing little device and it's always with me since it's so easy to stow away in a bag or satchel. Excellent review!
Thanks for sharing!
The best videos about the LX100II (And not only). Congratulations
Thank you!
I love your sample shots.
Thank you!
Thank you for this mini review! I think there aren´t many around here on UA-cam and it´s a shame, Finally someone who gives this little wonder credit it deserves !!!
Thanks! I made a more comprehensive review earlier, if you are interested: ua-cam.com/video/dosD8NCyuMw/v-deo.html
I have bought the LX100 II a few days and after having taken a series of test shots, I must say I am impressed with the image quality. So far I have been using Nikon gear, but I wanted a compact camera for "traveling light" and still have a camera that can deliver good images. I think with the LX100II I have found what I was looking for. A compact camera that lets me use settings as I want them to be and that delivers good quality images. The images are sharp with good details, have a good dynamic range and the colours are very accurate. Out of your 5 reasons to get the LX100II I would pick the image quality as my number 1.
Thanks for your comment. I'm happy you found the right compact camera for you. Now just shoot and have fun!
Did it work well in low light?
@@andrewstorm8240 I have used the camera at concerts and I'm very pleased with the results. A few examples: flic.kr/p/2i6JSmq flic.kr/p/2i5h95Y flic.kr/p/2ikrSwy
@@theosolberg Great example - thank you!
One of the best features, in my opinion, is the lens. There is no MFT interchangeable equivalent. But, then again it doesn’t have to cover the entire sensor on the LX100. Which leads me to believe that is the real reason for not having the 4:3 ratio cover the entire sensor and then having other ratios be a crop from there. It allows for a very compact, fast lens. In effect you have to accept a small compromise in 4:3 resolution even though it has a regular 4:3 sensor. But, it’s still a very tempting camera to me, and I already have four MFT cameras and a bunch of lenses! Damn you, Panasonic. Thanks for the video, Mr. Sulanto. 🙂👏
Thanks for you thoughts.
A really good review. Nice job! Definitely I'll buy this camera.
I hope you'll like your new camera.
pretty surprised how fast your channel is growing - good stuff
Thank you. I try my best.
You have taken some lovely images with this camera Matti. Looks great, I am looking for a compact camera for a friend and this fits the bill, cheers Rich
Thank you.
man nice camera a very good review
Wow! The LX100ii is an impressive little camera. It would be perfect for most of what I shoot. Except for low angle shots or when I need my 9mm lens for very wide FOV. For a camera this small, I can forgive it for not having an external mic jack. It's a lovely camera with a very lovely lens!
You did a great review as always. However, I'd like some see reviews with the review video shot with the camera being reviewed so we can see and hear a live demonstration of each camera's video and audio, or at least part of the review shot with model being reviewed.
BTW - Your English is excellent and easy to understand, and I enjoy your accent. Well done.
Thanks.
I love the original LX100, the Mark 2 is still a bit too expensive for me, but it definitely seems like a solid upgrade.
I love the LX10
Would pair well with the prime X100F in terms of aesthetic and ergonomy, or with the S1 for colour- and feature-matching
I've had my Mark I for over 2 years, and I love it. I cant wait to get my hands on the Mark II, though. Not available in Cambodia yet, but I keep on looking. I'm surprised you didn't mention the touchscreen, which the Mark I doesn't have.
The touch screen is nice, but this time it didn't make to my five reasons. Thanks for your comment and I hope you can find the MkII in Cambodia.
P.S. - The Venus Laowa 9mm F2.8 is on of my favorite lenses that I use on my EM10ii for architecture. I need and love that lens, which is the only reason I want to upgrade to GX9 instead of LX100ii.
That said, I still resent Panasonic omitting mic jack from GX9. That omission greatly lessons the camera to the point where I'm not sure I want to buy it.
You should review the Venus Laowa 9mm F2.8 Zero D rectilinear lens sometime. On M43 it really has almost zero distortion. It takes amazingly good UWA photos. It's my favorite lens for architecture in doors and out.
Very interesting video making me discover this camera which can be very useful for travelling. Is there a big difference between the first lx100 and this mark 2 ?
Not a huge difference, but the sensor is new and also the video features are better. Some other small changes too.
Great video. Thanks for posting it. Just wish they'd included a built-in flash with the camera. Otherwise, this camera is perfect for my needs.
Thanks! I guess they can't fit all in that compact package.
Looks like my LX-5 all grown up! Love the dials on this camera.
Does it have the same film styles as the GX-9?
It is like scaled up version of the LX-5. It has the same photo styles as all other Lumix cameras.
Hello Matti, what a great video and so refreshing from the screaming hyper vloggers. One small question: what was the wrist grip you were using? THanks in advance, Graham
Thanks! I guess the Finnish style is a bit more modest compared to some others😀 My daughter made the wrist strap for me some years ago.
Bravo! 👍👍👍
Seems like a very good camera. Thanks for presenting it. My daughter is very new to photography and this might be a good first buy.
Why not, this should do almost anything a camera does. I don''t she'll be disappointed.
Panasonic's GX range finder m4/3 cameras are also compact. They also have the advantage that the lenses can be removed to allow for easy cleaning of the sensors with canned air or a quality brush. Within a year of normal "real world" use, almost any camera will get sensor dust, but the problem is acute if a telescoping lens sucks in dirty air every time it is activated and the camera has been toted in pockets and bags that have lint and carry other stuff. To clean dust from an LX100 i or ii sensor is not an easy operation.
According to Lensrentals the zoom vacuum suck is (almost) an urban legend. Some lenses suck dust easier than others, but it has little to do with zooming. Here is a quote from their blog: "People assume that zoom lenses with extending barrels will “pump dust.” They do to some extent, but the dustiest lenses we see are actually some primes and short range zooms."
You can read the whole piece here: www.lensrentals.com/blog/2011/08/the-apocalypse-of-lens-dust/
Love your vids. Quality reviews of the LX100 ii. 👍
Is there going to be a LX100 iii? Should I wait? Or just purchase the mark 2 version, which was released 4 years ago? Big thanks~
Thanks. I have no idea if there is going to be another LX100, but currently it does not look like that.
@@mattisulanto Thanks for the reply. I appreciate it.
The form factor is great!. Looks like it would be great for street. I shoot with an Olympus omd em 5 km 3 so I dont really need zoom capabilities. I'd rather see a fixed lens like the fiji x100 f/v. A fast prime and I think I would jump on it as a second camera. I also heard about the dust issues.
The vertues of a compact camera with prime Lens are size, weight, aperture max and image quality... All things we find here apart that we have SEVERAL primes : 24mm f:1.7, 35mm f:2, 50mm f:2.4, 75mm f:2.8 and each focal between wich seems even better!
Nice video. Thank you! How bad is lens flare on this camera? Thank you.
Thanks! In my opinion the lens flare is no bad, but I don't know what others say.
I got it as a gift, and i'm trying to learn how to use it!
What a nice gift😀
@@mattisulanto i was suprised and delighted😁
Hey..nice video thanks. The one and only reason to hold me back to buy this camera, is the motorized zoom and the fixed screen on the back. I got it in my hands and it was a pleasure to use it! But..see above. Always a better camera than the rx100 series in view of IQ, an handling. Just my opinion.
Thanks! Yeah, nothing is perfect and I understand your point.
Mathias Anders The motorized zoom is an advantage for street/event photography... you can do everything with with your right hand after you set your exposure priority. This is a great wrist strap camera. Yes, a flip screen would be nice at times.
Thank you for the excellent presentation of the strengths of the LX 100II. Have you tried the Lumix TZ200 ? If yes what your opinion compared to the LX100II.
Thanks. I have not tried the TZ200, so can't say anything really.
@@mattisulanto Thanks.
I have LX100 Mark one with stubborn dust problems. Love the controls but hate the dust speckles. Too afraid to buy LX100 Mark 2 because the risk of dust.
I have seen many complaints about the dust, but I never experienced that.
Hi Matti originally I was planning to buy the LX100 m2 especially with all the good reviews on youtube. My main points were semi pocketable, 4k video, with a large senor and bight lens. Then I went shopping and looked at some of the prices and reviews . Found out there is a serious dust issue with the sensors. People will start noticing it after 1 yr using the camera. Panasonic said it is normal for dust to get into cameras but others said it is a design fault. I saw some pictures with dark spots caused by the dust. I was very disappointed after read the problem since I wanted it. Have you noticed any dust yet ?
I am now waiting for the replacement for Panasonic GX9 to see what are the price and spec. The replacement is rumored to be out soon. Was thinking about putting the kit pancake lens 12-35 3.5-5.6 with the replacement GX9 . You did a review of that lens.
Maybe the LX100 m3 will fix the dusk problem but I can't wait for 1 to 2 yrs.
I have not seen dust in my LX100II photos, but I have heard of the problem.
I have a review of the 12-32mm, please browse my channel.
Nice review, but I wonder that is there any kind of dust problems like predecessor had ?
So far I haven't had any dust problems.
Being a mark II, I wish it had a tilting/flip-out screen and a higher ratio zoom lens to justify the upgrade for current LX100 users. It’s an excellent camera for first time buyer of the series
True, it's not a major upgrade, but I like the lens just fine. The reach is modest, but we get fast max aperture and good optics.
sulantoblog Agree. I am a happy LX100 user myself.
I'm happy with the range of the zoom - it covers the vast bulk of the focal lengths that you need on a carry everywhere camera. The improvement that I wish had been included (but wasn't) is to be able to hide the LCD screen so it isn't damaged when not in use. I rarely use the LCD screen - mostly just menu-diving - so I'm happy for it to be off-show & protected most of the time.
I might have been tempted by that change; I'll keep using my LX100 v1 for now.
I wish Panasonic made the sensor fixed 3:2 AR and gave us the full 20 MP res. Most ppl don’t care about the two other ARs.
Hi Matti, thank you for posting this review. I’m in the market - nearly bought the Mark 1 version but it is renowned for attracting dust on the sensor (Google it, plenty to read). Evidently Panasonic added a new gasket or two or something similar to the Mark ii to stop the dust from entering whenever the lens is zoomed in and out and thrown into the bag, but I digress. My question to you is how responsive is the LX100 Mark ii camera? I shoot weddings and event photojournalism, I need a premium pocketable camera that is reliable and responsive, no shutter lag what so ever. I live in the Middle East where there’s no such etiquette as being able to handle a range of unopened new kit in the shop before purchase. What say you, if I leave the LX100 Mark ii turned on, compose and shoot….will the thing focus and fire near instantaneously, or will I miss the shot due to shutter lag? By the way, I really enjoyed your magnificent photographs. Subscribed, hit the bell and liked. Your turn :-)
Thanks, Jeremy. Based on my experience the LX100II is a great camera and I've had no issues with any kind of lag. It's probably the best handling compact camera at the moment and I can highly recommend it based on my experience. I've had no problem with the battery life, but the battery could be a bit bigger. But, I have to say that we all have slightly different shooting techniques and it's possible that you don't like the same camera that I like. It's always very difficult to recommend a camera to someone else. Hope this helps.
I'm a seasoned Lumix FZ200 user, a kind of cut down version of their G series with an all in one zoom bottled onto it. I love it. Handling and ergonomics are excellent. Point being I think Lumix know what they're doing in the ergonomics dept and I expect the LX100 Mark 2 to fit just as nicely in my hand. The LX3 did. Cheers for the fast response.
The LX100 ii is not any more sealed than the LX100 i. There is no official Panasonic document that acknowledges sensor dust as a "known issue" at all, and there are only anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations that the LX100 ii is somehow different in that regard. My LX100 i got sensor dust after a year of moderate use and being toted in a bag or pocket. A used LX100 ii, with low shutter count, acquired sensor dust in less time than that. A vacuum cleaner nozzle did not help. DIY sensor cleaning requires total disassembly in a dust-free setting. Not easy: most household air has dust, pollen, and lint. The DIY-er's hands exude oils and human breath carries all kinds of sticky aerosols. Reassembly is a very delicate matter too.
Love the camera. Are there still issues with dust on sensor like on the original version? That would be a deal breaker for me.
I can't see any dust on the sensor, but I can only speak for myself. I've used the camera quite a bit, though.
@@mattisulanto - Thank you for the answer!
How is this cameras light gathering capabilities compared to say a the G9? I know lenses play a big part, but with a similar lens, would you say it was equal (or near equal) in lower light or would you say it was somewhat less effective? My current compacts are a 1" sensor and 1/2.3, so m43 would be a jump in that respect. Later in the year I am considering an upgrade (as my compacts are showing their age a little bit), so any insights would be useful.
It's slightly better than the best 1" sensor cameras and very close to the G9. DPR has similar results in their studio scene: www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-dc-lx100-ii/6
i purchase this ...Leica D-Lux 7
Hi, Matti. Thanks a lot for the video about this very interesting camera. There are a lot of talks about "leica" look to the photos (sharpness, (mini)contrast etc.). Could you please explain this (in other video maybe)? Is this "leica" look applies to the lens on lx100ii? Thanks.
Thanks. I don't know what that Leica look means😀 , but it's a very nice camera.
@@mattisulanto Thank you for swift responce. This subject pops up almost everytime when people compare lumix and leica lenses for panasonic cameras ☺.
Of course it has ‘leica’ look. It is just cheaper version of Leica d-lux 7. It is actually Leicas optics. 🤷🏻♂️
Hi Matti, just wondering, what is the brand of wrist strap you are using in this video? Thanks!
It's a strap that my daughter made for me.
Hi, would you recommend this for a hobbyist photographer? Someone with only a couple of years of photography experience? I'm looking at mirrorless options but this one has piqued my interested as well.
Of course, this is a very nice camera, if you are happy with the zoom range of the lens.
Thanks for review, Matti! It looks like a great compact camera, for everyday carry. But for the street photography purposes I think it will be better to use either Fuji X100* or Ricoh GR*. What do you think about those cameras? Is this comparison fair?
The X100 and GR have become very popular among street photographers and not without a reason, but it doesn't mean you need one of those to shoot street. It's a matter of opinion and it's great we have so many options to choose from. When the LX100II set up correctly it's pretty good for street too.
@@mattisulanto yeah you're. I guess I'm a little bit on a sceptical side for LX100 because I already own GH5 and I don't think that I need another m4/3 camera :)
Sai I find it is nice to have a small zoom for street photography, easy to set at f/5.6 or f/8 AP and zoom when necessary... usually keep @ 24mm.
Hi Matti ! Does this camera able to adjust the highlight and shadow , like in G9?
Yes, it has the Highlight Shadow feature.
@@mattisulanto Thank you !!
I love mine.
I got one some weeks ago - and I really like the camera too. But for me personally there is still one big downside. Capture One does not support the RAWs at this time. For me it is still the main reason why I don’t use it much. Although Lightroom supports the RAWs - but I don’t like it and it is annoying to use another program just for one camera ... I hope this will be fixed soon - but Phase One did not tell us if or when it will happen.
Sorry to hear about that, but that' not the camera's fault😀 I hope Phase One will fix that soon, the LX100II has been out for a long time already after all.
As of C1 v12.1, this is supported
thanks! compared to the Sony RX100 VI , which one is better? honestly, the Leica lens is the reason I consider this cam.
I have not used the latest RX, but the LX has better controls for sure.
You mention that you can set this up to lock down any extraneous, uninvited features from popping up accidentally. That is a drawpack on the Panasonics. Jittery, nervous, low attention span. Always subverting simple with an unwanted set of options that just won't go away. On your list of potential new video lessons, consider one on how to make this camera Apple "simple" by freezing all the unwanted options. Thanks.
Thanks, that might be something for the future.
This has become my every day camera even though I have three MFT system cameras and a slew of medium format film cameras. The reasons are in line with what you are saying, especially the quality and speed of the lens and the physical (dial and ring) controls. The zoom range covers 99% of my needs. I can always use one of my MFT cameras if I need something different. The one thing missing, though, is a tilt screen, though I find if I hold the camera out from my body at waist level I can get a sense for what the screen is showing. Normally I prefer and use the viewfinder. Thanks for the review. As always, very helpful.
Thanks for sharing.
Matti, do you have any opinion on how this camera compares to its more expensive red-dotted sibling?
As far as I know they both are the same camera, but Leica has its own menu system. I don’t know if the software/operating system is the same.
@@mattisulanto I remember there were all kinds of reasons given by folk as to why the Typ 109 was better than the LX100 - mostly I think it was folk rationalising paying the extra for the red dot. I folk are trying to justify buying the D-lux 7 over the LX100 II, I haven't noticed this time.
👍👍👍👍
I’m looking at getting the Leica version of this camera, the D-Lux 7
How is this compared to X100V? About to buy one of them but I cant choose which one I should go for. Does X100V have dust problem too?
I don't know about the X100V if it has a dust problem or not, I think you have ask Sony users. I suppose you are referring to the Sony RX100V.
Is this camera suitable for low-light photography (w/o flash). e,g. indoor environment, night time photography? Thanks.
It depends on what you shoot, how you shoot and what are your expectations.
How did you attach your strap? It is not th one which comes with the camera and is attached apparently only on one side.
The strap is just a loop through the strap eyelet on one side.
What schoul I choose between Panasonic lx100 II and cano g5x II ? (tanks for the anser)
I'm biased, so my choice would be the LX100II, of course😀
I own the older version DMC-LX5. Initially I wanted to upgrade to a LX 100II but got somehow too bold and grabbed a Fujifilm X100V instead. Now I find myself regretting. First of all it set me back a whooping 1400 Euro. Secondly comparing the Fuji with my LX5, I now miss the 24 mm madly.
The X100V is an excellent camera. Get used to the lens and be happy. That's my advice.
You know there's adapters for Fuji x100 series. 28mm and 75mm. Just go couple steps back or 1 ft back to get 24mm angle when using the 28mm adapter on the Fujifilm x100V
@@eddiegee2940 I bought the 28 mm adapter recently. It was hard to get one in silver, so I settled with the black one. This has changed everything for me, though the compactness of the camera has suffered. Furthermore, since I get more and more used to the capabilities, I find this camera exceptional good. The colours are astonishing. I really fell in love with it.
@@shuabshungne8043 I had fujifilm x30 but had to return it, couldn't charge battery, maybe the electric plug only adaptable to international electric socket. My electric socket in my house could not charge the camera, very frustrating, that was my baby steps into to the Fuji world
I realy consider to buy Lumix LX 100II or GX80 but also I`m curious of Fujifilm X-A7 with APS-C format sensor. I`m curently use Canon G1X and old Lumix LX2.
Thanks Matti... Would you still recommend this compact zoom in 2023?
It's a good zoom compact even in 2023. However, I'd also take a look at Sony RX100 series.
@@mattisulanto thanks... I'm upgrading from a g7xii and want something with a higher image quality. The rx100 is a bit out of budget and I don't like the menu/slippery body. I am leaning towards the ricoh griiix and sacrificing zoom. I'm sad no manufacturers are making compact cameras anymore as I feel phone cameras are still a long way off in terms of IQ and usability. Thanks again for your videos!
@@bowieknife Sure, if you can live without a zoom the GR3 or GR3x is by far the best pocket sized compact at the moment. I have many GR videos too, please take a look: ua-cam.com/play/PLkkZKkR0lgqkRwelW-mDgztjsEu3Im5TS.html
GX85 is around the same price on the 2nd hand market. Does the LX100ii have some advantages? To me the GX85 seems a better camera
I think both are good and it’s a matter of taste which one you prefer. The LX is for those who want a fixed lens camera.
Hi, if the lens only goes from F1.7 to 2.8 the close up depth of field must be bad?
That F1.7-2.8 is the widest aperture of the lens, but of course you can stop down the lens to F16 if necessary. In this video I'll explain what the numbers on lenses mean: ua-cam.com/video/ryh-G-QIfqs/v-deo.html
@@mattisulanto ah OK that makes better sense. Have you ever used a Canon G7x mk11?
@@ModelRailwaysUnlimited I don't think I have ever used that Canon.
Sir tell me which one is better lens vi's lx100 ii vs ricoh grii
Can you define better, what do you mean by better?
I'm getting kind of frustrated with mine unfortunately. I'm left eye dominant which causes me to press the back of the camera up to my face. Since it has a non articulating back touch screen I'm constantly changing settings and focus points unintentionally with my face. It's caused a lot of screwed up pictures. I'm going to look into it when I have time to see if there is a way to disable the touch screen or do something else that will help.
I don't use the LX100 any more, but if I remember correctly you can disable the screen.
@@mattisulanto thanks - I figured out the Fn5 button toggles the screen off and on to only use the LVF not long after I posted. - meant to go back and edit it. It's the first camera that I've encountered that issue.
@@TheMikeharris7 You can deactivate the touch screen for viewfinder use only. (C Wrench > Monitor/Display > Touch Settings > Touch Pad AF > OFF.) There is also an option to use it like a trackpad (OFFSET), which also alleviates the problem somehow, but by setting it to off, you should definitely get rid of any nose-related problems.
I do think it s an interesting camera but is it worth 700 euros which is the price we found it in France. I am not sure. If we compare it to gx80 which is 16mpx with the 12-36 very small lens which you can find at around 500€ I don t really see what these 200€ difference are for. Better ergonomics this true, better or rather speeder lens... but no possibility to change lens. True that this mark 2 at 500€ would be a top camera but at 700€ I am not yet convinced.
Well, some people want a fixed lens camera, not a system camera, and for those the LX100II is a great option. However, if you don't care if it's a fixed lens or a system camera, the situation is a bit more complicated, like you said.
How do you overcome without built in ND filter
It's only a problem in video and you can put a filter on the lens. Built in ND would be better, of course.
did you take this video using dmc lx100 ? and what mic are you using plz help
This video was filmed on the Lumix GH5s and the mic was the Sennheiser K6/ME66 shotgun mic.
@@mattisulanto if i use my dmc lx100 i would get same quality?
@@almasri51 You can get very nice video footage on the LX100 or LX100II. However, you can't use external mic with the LX100.
Does this lx100ii have grain options in monochrome ?
Yes, grain is there.
is possible some trick, or configuration for portrait with this camera.??
Not sure what you mean, but you can shoot portraits on this camera.
@@mattisulanto and you have some video explaind this configuration for portrait mode? focus eye. iso . aperture etc. thanks for yours videos. Amazing time.
@@arenalsurferphoto I don't have a video or specific settings for portraits.
@@mattisulanto ok thanks for the info.!!!
Fly by wire zoom bothers me so much...I must wait for the zooming everytime i need...Mechanical zoom is always the best way for the fast actions...
I guess it depends on your shooting style. I don't zoom that much and the electronic zoom works pretty well.
@@mattisulanto thats why i sold it, also focus hunts time to time...
@@aktunav No problem, that was not your camera😀
@@mattisulanto you are right 😊
Now you have made me want to sell my Sony A6000.
I didn't mean that😀
I have A6000, it's time has passed.
I've owned both. Keep the a6000 bro.
This or the GX80 with 14mm lens for Street photography?
Both work and it comes down to your personal preference. To me the GX80 + 14 sounds really simple and good, because there is no zoom.
Does it get dusty inside like the MK1?
I haven't seen any dust inside of my camera.
Did Panasonic ever fixed the dust issue?
I've never had any dust issues, so I can't say.
This or Ricoh gr III ?
Hmm, they are a bit different cameras. The GR has a prime lens and no viewfinder, but a larger sensor. Tough choice that I don't have to make😀
I had the original version and loved until I couldn’t remove dust on the sensor.
I've heard about the noise problem, but haven't experienced it with my camera.
I was seriously considering this camera (I'm between X100V and this) but given I wanted to simply throw it to my pocket and walk about I just know there's going to some dirt involved.
That's the only reason I'll be going with Fujifilm.
Can you zoom manually?
You can turn the zoom ring manually, but it's a power zoom.
For someone who have great skills but want to finally start to buy his first camera to experience the analog control, between Leica D Lux 7, Q2, X100F and Leica CL, which to get?
There is no Lumix?😀 Of those I'd take the Q2, since there is no Lumix.
1st camera, I'd not recommend spending as a much as a Q2, that's for committed enthusiasts or pros. It's not a 1st timers piece of kit. Get some experience 1st.
M10R would be perfect for someone who have great skills
how about dust on the sensor and inside lenses...is that problem fixed?
I haven't had any problem with dust on the sensor.
Is it weather sealed?
No.
I always trust a man reviewing a camera brand, while wearing the brand name on his t shirt!
beats me i cannot think of one, free t shirt?
Yes, free t-shirt.
Lumix G85 or LX100 ii?
Two totally different cameras for different purposes. If you never want to change lenses, take the LX.
@@mattisulanto i’m more into videography with low budget. I’m eyeing for lumix G85, lumixG7, Fuji XT-200 and Canon M50 any recommendations?
@@imnotyourdaddyx I have not used any of these extensively for video, except for the M50, which is a decent video camera, but has no IBIS, which can be a deal breaker. The Lumix G7 and G85 have a lot of happy users too and MFT as a system is much better than Canon M.
@@mattisulanto it’s hard to choose with a low budget :-(
@@imnotyourdaddyx I know, but only you can make the decision.
Why the hesitation to say “the word” - Leica? You can compare it or even say it has a Leica lens, no reason to beat around the bush. This and the D-Lux 7 are partners after all.
Thanks for your comment. I watched the video again, and are you complaining that I did not say "Leica"? Check out some of my other videos and you can see, that I say "Leica" many times😀
it is so pretty until it will be on - that zooming lens is .....
If they've sorted the dust problem out it will be a brilliant camera. If not it's a NO from me.
dust dust dust :(
Theres only one thing I dont like about the LX100ii - its too darn expensive! ☹️
Its cheap to what you gets
If you don't like this viewfinder, you got problems
That's your opinion, of course, and thanks for sharing that. It's a small viewfinder and field sequential, so understandable not everyone loves it.
Poussières, poussières et poussières ! Trop cher.
Ok photo image quality - video is terrible