It's called: "I want power. The power to tell you how to live because I know better than you." It just displays their arrogance for all the world to see.
Yes, it's called: _agitation_ . Anyone who has lived in European countries and universities which are full of marxists, actually also their public sector, media, everything else too...will have learned very well how that is part of marxist and socialist strategy. Especially several decades ago when they were outnumbering everyone else initially and were so amped up on their conquering of society that they unashamedly educated everyone around them of their tactics, networks, boasting about their power. They even have songs about _agitation_ . They do it to identify the "sides", to identify their enemies. They _agitate_ to get responses from everyone. From those responses they can see which "side" everyone belongs to. Then when they have their lists of enemies they are able to launch attacks on many fronts and with any methods, agents, operatives they deem suitable for each case or situation. Attacks to which the targets have no defence, which they cannot respond to, and whose originator they usually can't even identify or especially not prove. And to just overall create an air of terror, which then pressures people in the middle to join their side out of fear, or at least not oppose them in any way. The marxists/leftists on the other hand have formed protective walls of taxpayer funded public sector, institutions, corrupted legal systems, armies of infiltrators and a systematically built up fake "legality" for their actions and "illegality" of yours. They use your tax money to target you and to protect themselves from you. Oh, and unions especially: they use everyone's union fees to protect themselves from you too, and use it to attack you. And as military doctrine tells us: the attacker always has an advantage over those merely reacting to an unexpected attack. They've prepared for their attacks: they decide the methods, time and place. They've prepared their defences to any counter-attacks too. Nowadays they have digital, searchable lists of enemies which they can call up at a moments' notice on their phones. There is a reason that in most civilised countries it's prohibited to gather lists of people. But now they're circumventing all that and definitely do have lists of targets, and they can go through your digital footprint to see if you have mentioned something in support of their CRT/BLM/LGBTQ+/pronoun/COVID lockdown extremist stuff or if you've said anything against.
I was thinking this for a long time. The part about making lists of enemies from your digital footprint. Russel Brand has a huge following now and he miraculously pumps out content that others have been banned for treading much further from the line than he does. Got me thinking he might be one of the," bait" content producers to get the anti establishment to expose themselves.
Very true, BUT we have the vast majority of great thinkers & the proven best ideas of history on our side, and the TRUTH! As if this wasn’t enough, we have the ‘Invisible Hand’ of Almighty God, along with his Watchers (a.k.a. ‘Aliens’,imo; Plus an invisible host of angelic beings, all fighting for us in our Great War for the soul of Humanity! We are all in this & must unite together as a force for good, but their tools are ridiculously inadequate compared to the Divine Order, which they can never gain access to or counter this Greater surveillance network that is on the side of good & available to all believers who can tap into it❣️🤴🏻🗽👼🏻
@@brentatkinschryssilvestre8012 I disagree, but who cares… they already know who’s on what side, & don’t need any such clique bait, esp. one who’s exposed the worst of the bad actors and billionaires by NAME, I don’t think they would be tolerant of such bad publicity & I would be careful not to judge anyone, personally, but hope you would try not to as well, without solid documentation and/or plenty of verifiable proof to attack someone else’s credibility ⁉️⚡️🙏🏻👼🏻
I actually had that same thought. I was a feminist for such a long time until I realized that I’m really okay with men being in charge. It’s a natural female instinct to find that attractive and I always have. It’s not a bad thing it’s just nature playing it’s part. Sometimes you have to relinquish power to gain your power back the way you want it.
Another thing to consider is that it isn’t “men in charge”, it’s more like, the people in charge require certain psychological traits, they need to be highly conscientious, competitive, and extremely disagreeable. It just so happens that these traits are far more common in men, a very small portion of men. I’m a man, I have no desire whatsoever to be the boss of people and ascend to the peak of the dominance hierarchy, it just doesn’t appeal to me. A lot of men have more in common with the average woman than they have in common with the ultra competitive 1%.
I was the same kind of bonehead when I was a teenager and college kid, too. Difference is that there was no kind of social media to expand the anger that this current viral incitement causes. We outgrew it without other (formerly like-minded) brethren able to *cancel us* when we grew into maturity. The issue isn't even necessarily social media but the _viral thought upload_ to the younger generations who may not have the courage to be able to independently grow into their own opinions. I mean take you, JBP, for example; I remember I needed to learn about you when I saw on all platforms that you "hated" transgender people. Immediately, I associated your name negatively. But then when my stepdaughter wanted to be a boy I needed to learn about you so I could *fight* your (apparent) platform to harm her/his well-being in life. Welp. Right. I learned about you and discovered there was no such thing at play. What befuddles me is that SJWs aren't doing the same thing. They're just toeing the propaganda line; And this is why we're in trouble. I love you and I thank you.
Actually the difference is that you weren't part of a marxist network, which they utilised as a "paramilitary" force. In Europe for over half a century they've had an international network including different kinds of layers, with all of them strategically guided and included in an overall plan. That strategy has been widely shared internationally in a systematic fashion through public sector, union/unionist, socialist party, NGO, and university networks in their often taxpayer-funded, organised dissemination of ideology, strategy, research. And now finally it has become so widespread in the USA that they too have organised themselves into a similar multi-layer nationwide network with all the different parts of the machine: political, private sector, NGO, university, union working together and recruiting all kinds of fringe groups to do the "dirty work" without implicating them directly. In Europe for decades, and now in the USA it's all organised and strategically led. They groom and grow new members and take control of all areas. They start with young people in universities by arranging their whole worlds to be under their organisation, everyone, all the strongest and smartest ones especially are given a path to rise through _their organization's_ ranks and every alternative is squashed. They take the smart and motivated ones under their wing, and also gather the 'numbers' to support their activity and to extinguish all other rival activity. Nowadays they don't only use the universities but also get the rabble, criminals, degenerates through organisations like NGOs and radical activist groups with their activity also designed to entrap them in their system and use them for their purposes. They literally encourage and pay for the consequences for their criminal "guerrilla" activity. The vice president and top officials, senators in the democrat party of the United States of America is directly involved in directing those "paramilitaries" to certain targets they point out, and then help them and encourage them to continue after being caught of directly criminal acts for example by bailing them out of jail, helping them with their legal expenses, and by having had their political activist agent judges appointed into positions of power in order to abuse their office to help break the law. This is not theory, not conspiracy theory. This is fact, this is fact which those people and organisations will repeatedly tell us all about. They themselves tell us what they are doing, their theories, methods and tactics have been out in the open for decades. They have literally made _songs_ about how they do this, why, and how it works!!
Jordan has written books and we are living in a time of his greatness that we can listen and watch him find meaning in every level Professor Jordan Peterson will have many books written about him that future people will be reading and for this time in my life I am living in his time on earth 🌬God is good🕊 I believe this is Jordan at his best
Ur probably the best teacher I came across and I respect your work truly... You are 98 percentage correct about almost every lecture I listened to... Your the GOAT 😎
I think it's more like unwitting pawns of chaos. They think they have the moral highground because they lack the ability to critically think or they refuse to listen to anybody who doesn't match their viewpoints and love to use strawmans and anecdotal evidence to win arguments against idiots . This is why this is so fucked.
This man is a fucking man. To have the BALLS to say something like that in front of a crowd is mind-boggling, and to have the humility to say that it's only his best thinking, not a convicted belief. And God bless him for stickin up for Freud. I just read the other day for my psycho-analytic class that a vast amount of our modern psychology is built up on Freud. It's naive and petty to take cheap shots at him because you don't understand what he said about sex. Maybe because...you haven't read it?
Brown shirts and nothing more...its a crime that we tolerate them at all. WE have allowed this...and WE have no one to blame but ourselves. This must be how the Germans felt...but its you and me now.
Yeah, like the Germans, no one cares. This political paradigm is convenient for a lot of people and a lot of trouble to resist. This doesn’t end with a debate, that’s for sure.
I think the main reason is it’s easier finding purpose in something that makes you angry. Most people want to feel like they’re doing something for the greater good. And getting angry about something, because there’s nothing else to do in a free country where life is good, is the fastest way to feel accepted by other like minded people. The other reason I can think of is because men aren’t stepping up to the role of leader in many areas. In the last decade or so men have basically been told to shut up because it’s the woman’s turn to be in charge. Families are raising young boys to be nice and not offensive. Rather than being good and honest. Nice guys don’t do anything. But good men are the ones that move society along.
There’s an Arthurian legend where one of the knights has to answer a question: “What do women desire above all?” The answer was “To rule over men.” I wonder if there isn’t some truth to that.
Could you please address people who suffer with OCD but not physically, more in the mind such as counting and placement of words and of course how we can correct it? Thank you 😊
@Paulina WhiteDove I knew nothing about that so I did a lot of reading and I know it would help. Then I tried to get a medical card for it but it says I can’t in TN. 😕
The reason femanism doesn’t focus upon Islam and Islamic gender roles is because by in large the turn out for feminism and veganism is attributable moreso to counter-culturalism than their own doctrines. It would be more similar to a music festival than an ideology except that the in group out grouping relies upon purported beliefs than drugs and music and fashion (although by what extent is difficult to say in some cases).
It's because feminism has taken a back seat to intersectionality more broadly, over thee last ten years or so. Muslims are a.) Mostly brown, B.) Not western OR Christian, and C.) Seen as enemies and victims of the West and "white people". Therefore the progressive stack score makes them useful allies, for now. Power and dominance are the only principle the left has, everything else is theatre. Therefore the pretty clear faults of the religion from the lefts perspective, are acceptable...For now.
One thing I told a friend of mine not long ago, which probably wasn't an original idea of mine: Andrew Tate, who has gotten pretty popular recently, is actually analogous to Tyler Durden. He might represent the darker (or more exuberant) side of that masculine image which seems to have been pushed aside in the last few decades.
Maybe the reason why woman test men and men test ideas, is based on some idea that certain traits in females and males help organize/navigate certain structures? Men, being introduced into competition, have an endless amount of stairs to climb as it might scale nicely since its so detached from central emotions. If this was the case, then wouldn't this be a good theory as to why woman might be unhappy? If woman navigate the world through people, and therefore find it necessary to control what other people feel in order to regulate their own emotions , especially as their environment becomes ever more complex, would we not expect certain "anti-social" tendencies to display themselves at a higher rate in our culture at large? :)
Isn't it just that the female power game is that young women have beauty, older women have influence (through social networks)? So what if you're young, don't have beauty (or strength), and want power?
Dear Jordan, is there sny validity to the proposition that the exponential rise in SJW is aligned with delayed maturity, in the respect of the behaviour that is manifested. Why is it that there seems to be a clear distinction between young adults from rural backgrounds compared to those from cities? Is it a function of hardship?
They also love Chinese money, and turn a blind eye to genocide and their massively patriarchal and TOTALLY NON-DIVERSE society were the leaders are allowed to r4p3 tennis players freely.
could admire dominance means admiring DOMINANCE, not being dominated? Like dominating or dominated are both technically dominance just different POV . 7:35
I believe it was in the book of Isaiah (I could be wrong) where the bible warns that women and children will rule over you (ancient Israel), as if this was a consequence or an ill omen of sorts.
Of course they are causing chaos...this "movement" is based in labor movements and ideology where its encouraged to be a disruptor. Seems to me that unionism and labor ideology attracts "agreeable" mindsets.
Okay one of the things that bugs me about him is that he believes he can predict the future. I'm actually thinking about going out of my way to find him and one of his I don't even know what you call the presentation, a concert, a lecture, I don't see it as any real value in any way sense of form. But I think I may actually have to find him and speak to him in person because he is so fucked up in so many ways. But he has this cocky attitude like he understands the entire universe. I'll bet for one moment he can't change the spark plug. I'll bet for one moment he couldn't fix his own computer. I'll bet for one moment that he could not explain any of the contradictions that I could bring up in modern religions beliefs. I'll bet for 1 minute he couldn't tell me where the words and God we trust come from as printed on the United States currency. I'll bet for 1 minute he doesn't understand how the Federal reserve came into being. I think the best thing he may know about modern history, he may know what happened on 9/11, he may know what led up to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and he may understand that Osama bin laden is not dead. But then again, like I said he can't change the spark plug.
‘Screaming for equality gives a satisfying sense of dominance’
Equality and Justice are closely tied together, along with liberty
@@LilmeMusic Equality of opportunity, yes. Equality of outcome, no.
It's called:
"I want power. The power to tell you how to live because I know better than you."
It just displays their arrogance for all the world to see.
He always cuts through the “agenda” driven questions with such …class. Thank you. JP.
Yes, it's called: _agitation_ . Anyone who has lived in European countries and universities which are full of marxists, actually also their public sector, media, everything else too...will have learned very well how that is part of marxist and socialist strategy. Especially several decades ago when they were outnumbering everyone else initially and were so amped up on their conquering of society that they unashamedly educated everyone around them of their tactics, networks, boasting about their power.
They even have songs about _agitation_ . They do it to identify the "sides", to identify their enemies. They _agitate_ to get responses from everyone. From those responses they can see which "side" everyone belongs to. Then when they have their lists of enemies they are able to launch attacks on many fronts and with any methods, agents, operatives they deem suitable for each case or situation. Attacks to which the targets have no defence, which they cannot respond to, and whose originator they usually can't even identify or especially not prove. And to just overall create an air of terror, which then pressures people in the middle to join their side out of fear, or at least not oppose them in any way. The marxists/leftists on the other hand have formed protective walls of taxpayer funded public sector, institutions, corrupted legal systems, armies of infiltrators and a systematically built up fake "legality" for their actions and "illegality" of yours. They use your tax money to target you and to protect themselves from you.
Oh, and unions especially: they use everyone's union fees to protect themselves from you too, and use it to attack you.
And as military doctrine tells us: the attacker always has an advantage over those merely reacting to an unexpected attack. They've prepared for their attacks: they decide the methods, time and place. They've prepared their defences to any counter-attacks too.
Nowadays they have digital, searchable lists of enemies which they can call up at a moments' notice on their phones. There is a reason that in most civilised countries it's prohibited to gather lists of people. But now they're circumventing all that and definitely do have lists of targets, and they can go through your digital footprint to see if you have mentioned something in support of their CRT/BLM/LGBTQ+/pronoun/COVID lockdown extremist stuff or if you've said anything against.
I was thinking this for a long time. The part about making lists of enemies from your digital footprint. Russel Brand has a huge following now and he miraculously pumps out content that others have been banned for treading much further from the line than he does. Got me thinking he might be one of the," bait" content producers to get the anti establishment to expose themselves.
cringe
ah. a typicall klarlack-consumer.
Very true, BUT we have the vast majority of great thinkers & the proven best ideas of history on our side, and the TRUTH! As if this wasn’t enough, we have the ‘Invisible Hand’ of Almighty God, along with his Watchers (a.k.a. ‘Aliens’,imo; Plus an invisible host of angelic beings, all fighting for us in our Great War for the soul of Humanity! We are all in this & must unite together as a force for good, but their tools are ridiculously inadequate compared to the Divine Order, which they can never gain access to or counter this Greater surveillance network that is on the side of good & available to all believers who can tap into it❣️🤴🏻🗽👼🏻
@@brentatkinschryssilvestre8012 I disagree, but who cares… they already know who’s on what side, & don’t need any such clique bait, esp. one who’s exposed the worst of the bad actors and billionaires by NAME, I don’t think they would be tolerant of such bad publicity & I would be careful not to judge anyone, personally, but hope you would try not to as well, without solid documentation and/or plenty of verifiable proof to attack someone else’s credibility ⁉️⚡️🙏🏻👼🏻
I actually had that same thought. I was a feminist for such a long time until I realized that I’m really okay with men being in charge. It’s a natural female instinct to find that attractive and I always have. It’s not a bad thing it’s just nature playing it’s part. Sometimes you have to relinquish power to gain your power back the way you want it.
Another thing to consider is that it isn’t “men in charge”, it’s more like, the people in charge require certain psychological traits, they need to be highly conscientious, competitive, and extremely disagreeable. It just so happens that these traits are far more common in men, a very small portion of men.
I’m a man, I have no desire whatsoever to be the boss of people and ascend to the peak of the dominance hierarchy, it just doesn’t appeal to me.
A lot of men have more in common with the average woman than they have in common with the ultra competitive 1%.
Great comment! Glad you're on the side of truth.🙂
@sin pin Yes indeed obviously you are as your question doesn’t even make sense .
Your husbands a lucky man
You sound like a very very clueless woman. That's not nature. That's society Conditioning you
I was the same kind of bonehead when I was a teenager and college kid, too. Difference is that there was no kind of social media to expand the anger that this current viral incitement causes. We outgrew it without other (formerly like-minded) brethren able to *cancel us* when we grew into maturity. The issue isn't even necessarily social media but the _viral thought upload_ to the younger generations who may not have the courage to be able to independently grow into their own opinions.
I mean take you, JBP, for example; I remember I needed to learn about you when I saw on all platforms that you "hated" transgender people. Immediately, I associated your name negatively. But then when my stepdaughter wanted to be a boy I needed to learn about you so I could *fight* your (apparent) platform to harm her/his well-being in life. Welp. Right. I learned about you and discovered there was no such thing at play.
What befuddles me is that SJWs aren't doing the same thing. They're just toeing the propaganda line; And this is why we're in trouble. I love you and I thank you.
Actually the difference is that you weren't part of a marxist network, which they utilised as a "paramilitary" force. In Europe for over half a century they've had an international network including different kinds of layers, with all of them strategically guided and included in an overall plan. That strategy has been widely shared internationally in a systematic fashion through public sector, union/unionist, socialist party, NGO, and university networks in their often taxpayer-funded, organised dissemination of ideology, strategy, research. And now finally it has become so widespread in the USA that they too have organised themselves into a similar multi-layer nationwide network with all the different parts of the machine: political, private sector, NGO, university, union working together and recruiting all kinds of fringe groups to do the "dirty work" without implicating them directly.
In Europe for decades, and now in the USA it's all organised and strategically led. They groom and grow new members and take control of all areas. They start with young people in universities by arranging their whole worlds to be under their organisation, everyone, all the strongest and smartest ones especially are given a path to rise through _their organization's_ ranks and every alternative is squashed. They take the smart and motivated ones under their wing, and also gather the 'numbers' to support their activity and to extinguish all other rival activity. Nowadays they don't only use the universities but also get the rabble, criminals, degenerates through organisations like NGOs and radical activist groups with their activity also designed to entrap them in their system and use them for their purposes. They literally encourage and pay for the consequences for their criminal "guerrilla" activity. The vice president and top officials, senators in the democrat party of the United States of America is directly involved in directing those "paramilitaries" to certain targets they point out, and then help them and encourage them to continue after being caught of directly criminal acts for example by bailing them out of jail, helping them with their legal expenses, and by having had their political activist agent judges appointed into positions of power in order to abuse their office to help break the law.
This is not theory, not conspiracy theory. This is fact, this is fact which those people and organisations will repeatedly tell us all about. They themselves tell us what they are doing, their theories, methods and tactics have been out in the open for decades. They have literally made _songs_ about how they do this, why, and how it works!!
Jordan has written books and we are living in a time of his greatness that we can listen and watch him find meaning in every level Professor Jordan Peterson will have many books written about him that future people will be reading and for this time in my life I am living in his time on earth 🌬God is good🕊
I believe this is Jordan at his best
Ur probably the best teacher I came across and I respect your work truly...
You are 98 percentage correct about almost every lecture I listened to... Your the GOAT 😎
Thankful for JP during this insanity we are living in.
That's the plan. That's their purpose--pawns of chaos.
Well, to be fair. Stupid has always been on the menu.😌👍
They are useful idiots.
I think it's more like unwitting pawns of chaos. They think they have the moral highground because they lack the ability to critically think or they refuse to listen to anybody who doesn't match their viewpoints and love to use strawmans and anecdotal evidence to win arguments against idiots . This is why this is so fucked.
cringe
No, you can't even tell me your own purpose, nevermind the purpose of others, you are ignorant.
This man is a fucking man. To have the BALLS to say something like that in front of a crowd is mind-boggling, and to have the humility to say that it's only his best thinking, not a convicted belief. And God bless him for stickin up for Freud. I just read the other day for my psycho-analytic class that a vast amount of our modern psychology is built up on Freud. It's naive and petty to take cheap shots at him because you don't understand what he said about sex. Maybe because...you haven't read it?
“The more you scream for equality, the more your unconscious is going to long for dominance” lolol I see this among women
I agree. I am 61 years old and women today have no idea how bad it used to be. Women today have it great.
GOD Bless Everyone
Surprisingly the most interesting hypothesis that I've heard from Jordan Peterson since the beginning.
Absolutely, 100%. The general acceptance of 'Woke' pronouns really concerns me.
Brown shirts and nothing more...its a crime that we tolerate them at all. WE have allowed this...and WE have no one to blame but ourselves. This must be how the Germans felt...but its you and me now.
Yeah, like the Germans, no one cares. This political paradigm is convenient for a lot of people and a lot of trouble to resist. This doesn’t end with a debate, that’s for sure.
I think the main reason is it’s easier finding purpose in something that makes you angry. Most people want to feel like they’re doing something for the greater good. And getting angry about something, because there’s nothing else to do in a free country where life is good, is the fastest way to feel accepted by other like minded people. The other reason I can think of is because men aren’t stepping up to the role of leader in many areas. In the last decade or so men have basically been told to shut up because it’s the woman’s turn to be in charge. Families are raising young boys to be nice and not offensive. Rather than being good and honest. Nice guys don’t do anything. But good men are the ones that move society along.
The accurate truth in this comment right here
There’s an Arthurian legend where one of the knights has to answer a question: “What do women desire above all?” The answer was “To rule over men.” I wonder if there isn’t some truth to that.
Love the clips. Thank you
Create Chaos to rise to power to Dominate.
Oh there is chaos! No doubting that!
Thank you for a brilliant perspective.
Social Justice is vigilantism.
Finland and New Zealand have pretty good examples, both prime ministers straight up crazy.
They’re willing to fight for what is right. They are not always fundamentally prepared for how to properly fight.
Absolutely, my friend.
"Social justice warriors" vehemently repudiate organized religion, while zealously religious about their social reforms.
YES THEY ARE. PURPOSEFULLY!!!
Just based off the title of the video: YES!
Men and Women can't be 100% equal. But we can fulfill each other. Both genders have good sides and bad sides, at least that's how I see it personally
Rebels without a cause. Nor, a clue.
Could you please address people who suffer with OCD but not physically, more in the mind such as counting and placement of words and of course how we can correct it? Thank you 😊
@Paulina WhiteDove I knew nothing about that so I did a lot of reading and I know it would help. Then I tried to get a medical card for it but it says I can’t in TN. 😕
That's entropy for ya.
Outstanding...AS ALWAYS!!!!
Chaos is a ladder...
simply. Yes.
The reason femanism doesn’t focus upon Islam and Islamic gender roles is because by in large the turn out for feminism and veganism is attributable moreso to counter-culturalism than their own doctrines. It would be more similar to a music festival than an ideology except that the in group out grouping relies upon purported beliefs than drugs and music and fashion (although by what extent is difficult to say in some cases).
It's because feminism has taken a back seat to intersectionality more broadly, over thee last ten years or so. Muslims are a.) Mostly brown, B.) Not western OR Christian, and C.) Seen as enemies and victims of the West and "white people". Therefore the progressive stack score makes them useful allies, for now. Power and dominance are the only principle the left has, everything else is theatre. Therefore the pretty clear faults of the religion from the lefts perspective, are acceptable...For now.
One thing I told a friend of mine not long ago, which probably wasn't an original idea of mine: Andrew Tate, who has gotten pretty popular recently, is actually analogous to Tyler Durden. He might represent the darker (or more exuberant) side of that masculine image which seems to have been pushed aside in the last few decades.
Maybe the reason why woman test men and men test ideas, is based on some idea that certain traits in females and males help organize/navigate certain structures? Men, being introduced into competition, have an endless amount of stairs to climb as it might scale nicely since its so detached from central emotions. If this was the case, then wouldn't this be a good theory as to why woman might be unhappy? If woman navigate the world through people, and therefore find it necessary to control what other people feel in order to regulate their own emotions , especially as their environment becomes ever more complex, would we not expect certain "anti-social" tendencies to display themselves at a higher rate in our culture at large? :)
Yes
Love this guy
TL;DR: Yes.
Most definitely.
Isn't it just that the female power game is that young women have beauty, older women have influence (through social networks)? So what if you're young, don't have beauty (or strength), and want power?
Ha ha. True
Dear Jordan, is there sny validity to the proposition that the exponential rise in SJW is aligned with delayed maturity, in the respect of the behaviour that is manifested. Why is it that there seems to be a clear distinction between young adults from rural backgrounds compared to those from cities? Is it a function of hardship?
Yes.
Saudi Arabia falls in the acceptable range in feminists Family Guy color scale meme. Too brown to criticize. Or maybe just not white enough.
They both have the same father.
His name is satan.
They also love Chinese money, and turn a blind eye to genocide and their massively patriarchal and TOTALLY NON-DIVERSE society were the leaders are allowed to r4p3 tennis players freely.
Yup
YES!!
you're fighting windmills 🙂
could admire dominance means admiring DOMINANCE, not being dominated? Like dominating or dominated are both technically dominance just different POV . 7:35
I believe it was in the book of Isaiah (I could be wrong) where the bible warns that women and children will rule over you (ancient Israel), as if this was a consequence or an ill omen of sorts.
And children now demand adults to use pronouns that suit their needs, and they're getting fired and jailed if they don't. Prophetic
Yes, i think everyone on earth does that. Except when christ was here, and few others.
They have no useful purpose, so yes.
Of course they are causing chaos...this "movement" is based in labor movements and ideology where its encouraged to be a disruptor. Seems to me that unionism and labor ideology attracts "agreeable" mindsets.
100% agree! You see it everyday in big corporations. when there is a union like that there is chaos when there shouldnt be.
Any studies done in Rwanda where females are more numerous in politics due to the genocide in the 90s?? For political style comparison?
Doesn't Sweden have an all female government, (or did)? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Day 18 of very highly recommending that you read Berserk.
Obviously
100%
Thompson Susan Garcia Lisa Clark Gary
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Lewis Margaret Clark Charles Lewis Kevin
Anyone know who that woman is? I’d like to marry her.
💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖
The thumbnail isnt accurate. Usually it are both women being woke, yelling at a man
pseudo-intellectual, shallow buzzword-salad 🙂
Okay one of the things that bugs me about him is that he believes he can predict the future. I'm actually thinking about going out of my way to find him and one of his I don't even know what you call the presentation, a concert, a lecture, I don't see it as any real value in any way sense of form. But I think I may actually have to find him and speak to him in person because he is so fucked up in so many ways. But he has this cocky attitude like he understands the entire universe.
I'll bet for one moment he can't change the spark plug. I'll bet for one moment he couldn't fix his own computer. I'll bet for one moment that he could not explain any of the contradictions that I could bring up in modern religions beliefs. I'll bet for 1 minute he couldn't tell me where the words and God we trust come from as printed on the United States currency. I'll bet for 1 minute he doesn't understand how the Federal reserve came into being.
I think the best thing he may know about modern history, he may know what happened on 9/11, he may know what led up to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and he may understand that Osama bin laden is not dead.
But then again, like I said he can't change the spark plug.
So…you’re our saviour?
Yes
Yes