midairfortress
midairfortress
  • 38
  • 100 274
GOD: Three Things We Learn From CREATION
“No idea in the history of human thought has ever made more difference than the idea of Creation.” (Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli)
This video will explore THREE TRUTHS about GOD that we learn from the doctrine of CREATION.
Like, Subscribe, and leave a Comment!
Переглядів: 168

Відео

The CATHOLIC Explanation for the DEVIL
Переглядів 45119 годин тому
Where did Lucifer, a.k.a., Satan, get the evil inclination to rebel against God? Why would a finite creature think he could overcome the infinite Creator? What drove Satan to envy?
Refuting PROTESTANT Accusations [Regarding the QUEEN of Heaven]
Переглядів 3 тис.Місяць тому
NOTE: PARENTS MAY WISH TO SKIP TO 4:40 DUE TO SOME CONTENT AT THE START THEY MIGHT NOT FIND SUITABLE FOR THEIR CHILDREN. While many Protestants carelessly charge the Catholic Church with the sin of idolatry due to its veneration of the Virgin Mary, the Church itself speaks out loudly and explicitly against all forms of idolatry, including the "Mariolatry" it is frequently accused of. Moreover, ...
Jesus' Mother is the Queen of Heaven [BIBLICAL PROOF]
Переглядів 7 тис.Місяць тому
Mary as the Queen of Heaven. A beautiful Catholic teaching with tremendous theological and devotional richness. But, WHERE'S THAT IN THE BIBLE???? Well, it's all over the place, and not hard to see for those unprejudiced by anti-Catholic bias. In this video we look the Catholic *and* biblical doctrine of Mary's queenship: 1. What the Church Teaches Us 2. What the Bible Teaches Us 3. What this D...
Catholicism Promises Hope of Eternal Life [EVANGELICALS WRONG]
Переглядів 2,9 тис.Місяць тому
Evangelical theologian Wayne Grudem insists that Catholics can never really know whether they are in a state of grace. John MacArthur, boasting that his church is more than half full of ex-Catholics, agrees with Grudem that Catholics can never have assurance of their salvation. R.C. Sproul says the opposite: Catholics have a *false* sense of assurance. So which is it? Actually neither. Catholic...
Protestants Are WRONG [About the CRUCIFIX]
Переглядів 4,9 тис.Місяць тому
When I was still a young Catholic, some well-meaning Baptists convinced me to stop wearing a crucifix. Jesus was risen, and therefore if I'm going to wear a Christian symbol, it should be a bare cross, not a crucifix. Turns out, they were wrong, as are anti-Catholic preachers who falsely claim that the crucifix over the altar demonstrates the Catholic insistence on "keeping Jesus on the cross" ...
More Demonstrably False Claims about Catholicism
Переглядів 4,2 тис.Місяць тому
Pastor John MacArthur claims in one of his many anti-Catholic sermons that the Mass is invalid apart from the pure intention of the priest and on top of that the Mass is inefficacious apart from the pure intention of the worshiper. He concludes, as a result, that the Divine Liturgy is nothing but "mystical mumbo-jumbo right out of the pit to take captive the souls of people." Unsurprisingly, Ma...
The Resurrection of Jesus [DEFENDED]
Переглядів 462Місяць тому
Scripture tells us to always be ready to give a reason for the hope that is in us. Our hope is anchored in the bodily resurrection of Christ, without which our faith is futile and we are still in our sins. In this video we walk through a very basic approach to showing how the Christian claim that "God raised Jesus from the dead" is the thesis with the greatest explanatory power for the known hi...
Protestants Who Argue Like Atheists
Переглядів 1,6 тис.2 місяці тому
Protestants sometimes use arguments against Catholicism that are very similar to the kinds of arguments that atheists use against Christianity in general. We discuss Trent Horn's book that he wrote about this in today's video, with particular focus on Protestant opposition to "Catholic miracles." shop.catholic.com/when-protestants-argue-like-atheists-12-weird-ways-that-anti-catholics-mimic-secu...
Top Scholars Convert to Catholicism
Переглядів 4,4 тис.2 місяці тому
"The conversion stories in this book are about how accomplished and intellectually gifted men and women fell in love with Christ and the Church." Dr. Francis Beckwith Another book you should read and give to a Protestant friend. ignatius.com/by-strange-ways-bswp/ www.amazon.com/Strange-Ways-Theologians-Catholic-Church/dp/1621643638
The Liturgy: Where's That in the Bible?
Переглядів 1,1 тис.2 місяці тому
See my list of Top 5 Books that drew me back to the Catholic Church ua-cam.com/video/WqiG0gzS2iY/v-deo.html In this video I discuss another great book that has helped me to see just how biblically rooted and informed the Liturgy of the Mass is, from the Introductory to the Concluding Rites, and everything in between. Pick up a copy here: ascensionpress.com/collections/a-biblical-walk-through-th...
Debunking the "Experiencing Jesus" Test for Truth
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 місяці тому
I've had Protestant friends shun me as an apostate for returning to the Catholic Church. I've also had more gracious Protestant friends express their happiness that I'm "experiencing Jesus" as a Catholic, similar to the way they "experience Jesus" as a Baptist, or Methodist, or Presbyterian, etc. This is a very nice and well-meaning sentiment. But nothing more. Besides the fact that "experienci...
More Bad Arguments Against Transubstantiation
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 місяці тому
Norman Geisler and Ralph MacKenzie, in their book Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences, argue that the Mass shows absolutely no evidence of being a miracle, and in fact, that the Catholic argument supporting transubstantiation could also be used to support belief in Santa Claus and gremlins. As I explain in this video, Geisler demonstrates the weakness of his own objecti...
Beer With Protestant Friends
Переглядів 6092 місяці тому
A walk in the park as I share about the fellowship I shared last night with some Protestant brothers.
Two-Step Argument for Transubstantiation
Переглядів 2,6 тис.2 місяці тому
Step One is to establish the preconditions of God's omnipotence, Christ's incarnation, and Christ's resurrection. These provide the necessary conditions. Step Two is to demonstrate from the doctrine of the Real Presence, the testimony of the Scriptures and Fathers, and the dogmatic pronouncements of the ecumenical councils from the 13th to the 16th centuries the factual basis of transubstantiat...
A Bad Argument Against Transubstantiation
Переглядів 2 тис.2 місяці тому
A Bad Argument Against Transubstantiation
Early Church to Council of Trent
Переглядів 2,6 тис.3 місяці тому
Early Church to Council of Trent
Another Reason to Reject Protestantism
Переглядів 13 тис.3 місяці тому
Another Reason to Reject Protestantism
Six Reasons the Mass is Biblical
Переглядів 1,7 тис.3 місяці тому
Six Reasons the Mass is Biblical
Anti-Catholic Assumptions Calvinists Should Rethink
Переглядів 4,3 тис.3 місяці тому
Anti-Catholic Assumptions Calvinists Should Rethink
How Do Calvinists Get it So Wrong?
Переглядів 9 тис.3 місяці тому
How Do Calvinists Get it So Wrong?
Invitation to Eternal Life in Christ
Переглядів 4303 місяці тому
Invitation to Eternal Life in Christ
Home to Rome: My Top 5 Books
Переглядів 1,8 тис.4 місяці тому
Home to Rome: My Top 5 Books
Mary is The Ultimate Woman
Переглядів 1,8 тис.4 місяці тому
Mary is The Ultimate Woman
Ten Things Every Convert Needs to Know
Переглядів 2,2 тис.4 місяці тому
Ten Things Every Convert Needs to Know
The Gospels Are Central to Catholic Worship
Переглядів 3,3 тис.4 місяці тому
The Gospels Are Central to Catholic Worship
Thy Will Be Done
Переглядів 5654 місяці тому
Thy Will Be Done
Home to Rome: My Top 5 Books
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 місяці тому
Home to Rome: My Top 5 Books
As A Christian, You Should Be a Catholic
Переглядів 5 тис.4 місяці тому
As A Christian, You Should Be a Catholic
Advice to Protestants Looking Into the Catholic Church
Переглядів 1,4 тис.5 місяців тому
Advice to Protestants Looking Into the Catholic Church

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @leojmullins
    @leojmullins 2 дні тому

    Protestantism is a denial of the full truth of Christ. It is the core deceit at the centre of the heresies of the end times. Like all of Satan's lies, it is built on half truths and personal subjective interpretations of the scriptures while denying the traditions that brought the scriptures into being. Today, individuals trying to worship the authentic Christ and his family have no protection from the Accuser and Imposter provided by the Apostolic Orthodox Catholic Church that Christ founded to carry the faith down the centuries in their commonly held sacrements, scriptures, liturgies and traditions.

  • @KevinWichlan-k2g
    @KevinWichlan-k2g 4 дні тому

    Thank you for reminding us of God’s infinite goodness, widsdom and love. Great job!

  • @conniecope9501
    @conniecope9501 5 днів тому

    I need some further explanation of Matthew 18 that you quoted. I've had a Protestant tell me that we don't need confession because of this verse, where you take your sins to your brother.... If you resolve the sin then you have gained a brother... How should I response to this? Thank you

  • @stevenmerten4954
    @stevenmerten4954 5 днів тому

    Satan! Fallen Angel of The Light! Jesus is the Lamp and Light to the world. Jesus’ Light shines out to the world through His Catholic Church ‘Lampstands’, which are our Catholic Leaders. The ‘eyes’ of the ‘Body of the Catholic Church’, are our Catholic Church leaders. When Catholic leaders are Holy and good, then the whole Body of the Catholic Church is filled with the light of Christ. When Catholic leaders are bad, then, Luke 13:34 The Simile of Salt. “Salt is good, but if salt itself loses its taste, with what can its flavor be restored? It is fit neither for the soil nor for the manure pile; it is thrown out. Whoever has ears to hear ought to hear.” Matthew 5:13 The Similes of Salt and Light. You are the salt of the earth. But if salt loses its taste, with what can it be seasoned? It is no longer good for anything but to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. You are the light of the world. A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden. Nor do they light a lamp and then put it under a bushel basket; it is set on a lampstand, where it gives light to all in the house. Just so, your light must shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your heavenly Father. Luke 11:33 “No one who lights a lamp hides it away or places it [under a bushel basket], but on a lampstand so that those who enter might see the light. The lamp of the body is your eye. When your eye is sound, then your whole body is filled with light, but when it is bad, then your body is in darkness. Take care, then, that the light in you not become darkness. In the Book of Revelation, Jesus refers to His Catholic Leaders as ‘angels’. Example: Revelation 2:1 “To the angel of the church in Ephesus, write this:”, “To the angel of the church in Smyrna, write this:”, “To the angel of the church in Pergamum, write this:” Revelation 1:11 “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches: to Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea.” Then I turned to see whose voice it was that spoke to me, and when I turned, I saw seven gold lampstands and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, wearing an ankle-length robe, with a gold sash around his chest. The hair of his head was as white as white wool or as snow, and his eyes were like a fiery flame. His feet were like polished brass refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing water. In his right hand he held seven stars. A sharp two-edged sword came out of his mouth, and his face shone like the sun at its brightest. When I caught sight of him, I fell down at his feet as though dead. He touched me with his right hand and said, “Do not be afraid. I am the first and the last, the one who lives. Once I was dead, but now I am alive forever and ever. I hold the keys to death and the netherworld. Write down, therefore, what you have seen, and what is happening, and what will happen afterwards. This is the secret meaning of the seven stars you saw in my right hand, and of the seven gold lampstands: the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches. Revelation 2:1 To Ephesus. “To the angel of the church in Ephesus, write this: “‘The one who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks in the midst of the seven gold lampstands says this: “I know your works, your labor, and your endurance, and that you cannot tolerate the wicked; you have tested those who call themselves apostles but are not, and discovered that they are impostors. Moreover, you have endurance and have suffered for my name, and you have not grown weary. Yet I hold this against you: you have lost the love you had at first. Realize how far you have fallen. Repent, and do the works you did at first. Otherwise, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent. Matthew 6:22 The Light of the Body. The lamp of the body is the eye. If your eye is sound, your whole body will be filled with light; but if your eye is bad, your whole body will be in darkness. And if the light in you is darkness, how great will the darkness be. Revelation 13:11 The Second Beast. Then I saw another beast come up out of the earth; it had two horns like a lamb’s but spoke like a dragon. The reason Jesus calls our first Pope, St. Peter, ‘Satan’, is because Peter is talking, thinking and acting like the secular world talks, thinks and acts. Matthew 16:23 He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are an obstacle to me. You are thinking not as God does, but as human beings do.” It is actually Jesus, Mary, and Archangel Michael who ‘Deliver us from the Evil One’, when we get a Fallen Angel (Satan) Pope. In Jesus’ ‘Kingdom Come’, He will anoint a new ‘Victor’ as ‘Anointed One’ leader of His Church, as deselected Satan falls from heaven. Luke 13:34 The Simile of Salt. “Salt is good, but if salt itself loses its taste, with what can its flavor be restored? It is fit neither for the soil nor for the manure pile; it is thrown out. Whoever has ears to hear ought to hear.” Jeremiah 23:1 A Just Shepherd. Woe to the shepherds who mislead and scatter the flock of my pasture, says the LORD. Therefore, thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, against the shepherds who shepherd my people: You have scattered my sheep and driven them away. You have not cared for them, but I will take care to punish your evil deeds. I myself will gather the remnant of my flock from all the lands to which I have driven them and bring them back to their meadow; there they shall increase and multiply. I will appoint shepherds for them who will shepherd them so that they need no longer fear and tremble; and none shall be missing, says the LORD. Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will raise up a righteous shoot to David; as king he shall reign and govern wisely, he shall do what is just and right in the land. In his days Judah shall be saved, Israel shall dwell in security. This is the name they give him: "The LORD our justice." Revelation 12:7 Then war broke out in heaven; Michael and his angels battled against the dragon. The dragon and its angels fought back, but they did not prevail and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. The huge dragon, the ancient serpent, who is called the Devil and Satan, who deceived the whole world, was thrown down to earth, and its angels were thrown down with it.Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have salvation and power come, and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Anointed. It is a ‘Victor’, and not necessarily Pope Francis, who stands next to our King Jesus Christ, as His “Anointed One”, Ruling the World with Jesus, when Jesus, Second Coming, Comes to earth in All His Power and Glory. Revelation 2:26 To the victor, who keeps to my ways until the end, I will give authority over the nations. Revelation 3:12 “‘“The victor I will make into a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will never leave it again. On him I will inscribe the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from my God, as well as my new name. Revelation 11:15 Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet. There were loud voices in heaven, saying, 'The kingdom of the world now belongs to our Lord and to his Anointed, and he will reign forever and ever.' Revelation 12:10 “Then I heard a loud voice in heaven say: Now have salvation and power come, the reign of our God and the authority of his Anointed One” Acts of the Apostles 1:6 The Ascension of Jesus. When they had gathered together they asked him, “Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?” He answered them, “It is not for you to know the times or seasons that the Father has established by his own authority. But you will receive power when the holy Spirit comes upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, throughout Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” When he had said this, as they were looking on, he was lifted up, and a cloud took him from their sight. Matthew 19:28 Jesus said to them, “Amen, I say to you that you who have followed me, in the new age, when the Son of Man is seated on his throne of glory, will yourselves sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Revelation 3:21 I will give the victor the right to sit with me on my throne, as I myself first won the victory and sit with my Father on his throne. Acts of the Apostles 26:17 I shall deliver you from this people and from the Gentiles to whom I send you, to open their eyes that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, Matthew 6:9 The Lord's Prayer your kingdom come, your will be done on earth as it is in heaven .../ /... Subject us not to trial but deliver us from the evil one.' Jesus is Getting Married! www.apocalypseangel.com/married.html

    • @stevenmerten4954
      @stevenmerten4954 5 днів тому

      John 2:19 Cleansing of the Temple. “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” The Revelation 11 “Two Witnesses” are the Jewish and Catholic Churches. Revelation 11:11 "But after the three and a half days, a breath of life from God entered them. When they stood on their feet, great fear fell on those who saw them." 42 months, 1260 days, 3.5 years, is symbolic for the period of time between the Exile and Fall of Israel, and the rise of Zion, aka ‘The New Jerusalem’, aka the post Apocalyptic Catholic-Jewish ‘New Jerusalem’ Church atop God’s Holy Mountain under Messianic Reign. The Rise of Zion, New Jerusalem Church will reside in the Second Coming Presence of the Holy Trinity, living in the ‘Divine Will’. Jesus will Rule with and through His ‘New Jerusalem’ Church, which will be the Revelation 4, 12 Catholic elders and 12 Jewish elders, 24 combined elders, under Messianic Reign on earth, in Jesus’ Kingdom Come on free willed earth. All Spiritual Blessings and Sacraments of absolution of sin flows from heaven to earth through the Catholic and Jewish Churches, who are The Book of Revelation’s ‘Two Witnesses’ as well as ‘Two Lampstands’ and ‘Two Olive Trees”. Revelation 11:5 If anyone wants to harm them, fire comes out of their mouths and devours their enemies. In this way, anyone wanting to harm them is sure to be slain. Revelation 11:5 is Catholic Anathema and Jewish Kareth. Revelation 11:7 When they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up from the abyss will wage war against them and conquer them and kill them. Revelation 11:7 is Satan, coming up from hell to kill and destroy the Catholic and Jewish Churches, and all their teachings from the Holy Spirit over the past 2600 years. The Jewish Church was killed by Satan at the time when they handed over their Messiah Jesus Christ to be crucified. Satan is now killing the Catholic Church through Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernández and the Progressive Vatican ‘Gay Lobby’ Mafia Freemason Catholic Curia. When Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernández are finished, then all the work done by faithful Catholic leaders and Catholic Saints, over the past 2000 years will be finished, with no further guidance of the Holy Spirit to be used by the Catholic Church, only the secular lbgt and any fleshly desires and whims of those inputting into the Synod on Sodality. The Catholic Church will have been killed by the ‘beast that comes up from the abyss’. Then, in Revelation 11, Jesus’ Second Coming, Comes and God blows new life into the Jewish and Catholic Churches, who are the ‘Two Witnesses’, and Jesus’ Revelation 21 ‘New Jerusalem’ Church is born on free willed earth. This will be the Resurrection and Restoration of the ‘Two Witnesses’, who are the combined Jewish and Catholic Churches on free willed earth, in Christ’s post-Apocalyptic, New Jerusalem Church on earth. In Revelation 21, the New Jerusalem coming down from heaven, is really Jesus' Presence, Second Coming, down from heaven to reside in the Body of His New Jerusalem Church. All State of Grace post-apocalyptic Catholics will live in the Divine Will, united to the Presence of the Holy Trinity, in Jesus’ ‘Holy City’, ‘New Jerusalem’ Church on free-willed earth. The Revelation 11 ‘Come up here’, as Satan is cast down to earth (Rev 12:9), is Jesus taking over as King and Ruler of the world, as present God authorized secular power, which is presently ruling the world as a punishment from God, are removed as God’s selected rulers over Israel and the world. Jesus will Rule on earth with and through His Church, the ‘New Jerusalem’, combined `Catholic-Jewish Church. After Catholic Apostolic Successors read the Revelation 10 ‘small scroll’, which is a list of Catholic auto-anathemas, while seven Catholic Priests blow seven trumpets, this is when Jesus takes over as King and Ruler of the world. Jesus is not King and Ruler of the world until His subjects, Catholic Apostolic Successor put Jesus’ Laws into enforcement on earth. When they do so, Jesus is immediately crowned and King and Ruler of the world and Messianic Reign on earth begins. The enthronement of Jesus as King and Ruler of the world and the Coronation of our Blessed Mother of Messianic Reign! facebook.com/groups/588636984824716/posts/2085584228463310/? Revelation 11:11 But after the three and a half days, a breath of life from God entered them. When they stood on their feet, great fear fell on those who saw them. Then they heard a loud voice from heaven say to them, “Come up here.” So they went up to heaven in a cloud as their enemies looked on. At that moment there was a great earthquake, and a tenth of the city fell in ruins. Seven thousand people were killed during the earthquake; the rest were terrified and gave glory to the God of heaven. The second woe has passed, but the third is coming soon. Then the seventh angel blew his trumpet. There were loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdom of the world now belongs to our Lord and to his Anointed, and he will reign forever and ever.” The twenty-four elders who sat on their thrones before God prostrated themselves and worshiped God and said: “We give thanks to you, Lord God almighty, who are and who were. For you have assumed your great power and have established your reign.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif День тому

      Ummm…. That’s a lot of paragraphs. What are you trying to prove?

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif День тому

      @@stevenmerten4954Are you a troll? What does this have to do with the video?

  • @BensWorkshop
    @BensWorkshop 6 днів тому

    Many thanks.

  • @cheryl0327
    @cheryl0327 6 днів тому

    Great video! It's amazing to reflect on the awesomeness of the God of Creation, who, despite His grandeur, remains deeply mindful and caring for us. As Hebrews 2:6-7 says, 'What is mankind that you are mindful of them, a son of man that you care for him? You made them a little lower than the angels; you crowned them with glory and honor.' This verse reminds us of the incredible honor and care God bestows upon us, highlighting His immense love and attention.

  • @editha8661
    @editha8661 6 днів тому

    KEEP SPREADING THE THRUTH BROTHER ,,, THANK YOU FOR DEPENDING OUR CATHOLIC FAITH ,, GOD BLESS YOU !❤❤

  • @user-zp1ec3ot7g
    @user-zp1ec3ot7g 6 днів тому

    If we take the scriptures as the inspired Word of God, then we are on the right road to our heavenly destiny. The problem with Catholicism is they add so much to it that it dilutes the Gospel and sidetracks those who would accept the truth. You mentioned the church quite often. I assume that you mean the Catholic church. God has put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, which are those in Christ and not an institution. If this only means that Catholics are in Christ and anyone else who are not Catholics are not in Christ, then you need to prove that Catholics are the ones who have the truth. You do well in citing scriptures, but you cite others who have no authority that comes down from heaven, including the reformers.

  • @HeedGodsWord
    @HeedGodsWord 7 днів тому

    Wow, he's a good salesman. If I were an Eskimo, I'd be purchasing his ice blocks. Dear Catholic, I speak as a former devout Catholic who became born again in spirit 10 years ago. Please, please don't study doctrine before you pick up a Bible and read it cover to cover. The Bible is your measuring stick for truth. Jesus and the apostles warned us that there would be many wolves in sheep's clothing. Jesus repeatedly told us to hear Him and obey Him. Please, if you keep yourself simple-minded, then you're like a sheep to the slaughter in this world. I never read the Bible until I was 39. I was astonished to find out the Jesus and Mary in the scriptures are very different than I had been taught in my Catholic schools by the priests and nuns. Please, I beg of you to consider first that Jesus gave us much warning about false Christ's and false doctrine. He warned us the most about hell. I know the Catholic Church is NOT going to lead you to eternity in heaven. Rather, she is Satan's religion that is deceiving the simple. The devil knows people are born under sin and that our sin nature makes us naturally reject God and His word. I've never met a Catholic who has read the Bible, let alone annually their whole Catholic life. God did give us a conscience. We all have a natural yearning to be with our Creator. Please pray to God for His truth. I promise you that He'll take you up on that if you are sincere. If you do pray for Him to lead you unto all truth...then, buckle up. Because, facing God's truth is a real maturing process. You'll shake off the shackles of religion if you come to Jesus and believe on Him, trusting only in His finished work at the cross...plus nothing else. It is with a childlike faith and trust, that God accepts. God does not accept your sincerity. He will only accept His Son's perfect sinless blood as a propitiation for your sins. The RCC will tell you to be a good person and go to mass, but God says no one is good. So, instead of filling your head with all this religious doctrine, Jesus is calling for you to come to Him with a totally surrendered heart and leave your good works and merits behind. Even if you've tried so hard to be a good person, obedient, and good to others, and even if you have suffered much by abuse by others....God still wants for us to know there's nothing in us that can earn His favor. He only accepts Jesus' shed blood. If you turn to Him with repentance and belief that Christ died on the cross for your sins..then you will be born again. Eph 1:6-7 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;". I must testify that once I started reading the scriptures which revealed all my sins even before I got to the NT, I experienced some real "dark night of the soul" moments. Thankfully, God sent a real Christian to tell me about the spiritual battle for my soul. It is real! As soon as I confronted the fact that the devil had fooled me into worshipping false deities, all hell came at me. Thank God I prayed to God for deliverance. I am not kidding, but I dry heaved and had a number of episodes of diarrhea after I started repenting towards God of having served Catholic Mary and the Saints. Those devils scared me, but I had a Bible with me and only God's word makes them go away. I asked Jesus to rebuke all these devils tormenting me. I was delivered of a major stronghold religion had on me. It's truly evident, as I see the Catholics who are most devout with praying the rosary and taking the Eucharist...these folks are the hardest to win to Christ. These folks start screaming if you confront their Queen of Heaven. These folks have the most pride. If you think you have not yet trusted the gospel that saves (1 Cor 15:1-4), then start praying to God for His mercy and deliverance. Get yourself a King James Bible. Test the spirits with it. You'll soon find out that the spirits do not want that Bible in your hands. I challenge you. Read aloud Jeremiah 17:9-10, Read Romans 3, etc... John 1,...The devils hate those verses a lot! Vomiting, diarrheah, screaming, rage, etc...may ensue even if you're the sweetest person around.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 6 днів тому

      Actually his background is very steeped in scripture. He reverted after being away from the church 40 years - During that time he was a senior pastor of three churches. He graduated from a Thomistic seminary (with honors) and studied under and was mentored by the world renowned Christian apologist, Dr. Geisler. He later entered a PhD program at Baylor University (full honors scholarship) with Dr. Frank Beckwith, former president of the National Evangelical Society (who also is a revert) where he served as an assistant to the President. He also was personally assisted in ministry by Dr. Land, Formerly he served as president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), the public policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention and president of Southern Evangelical Seminary. After much interior struggle he “read his way” back into the church.

    • @HeedGodsWord
      @HeedGodsWord 5 днів тому

      @@NuLeif That is a very impressive list of his accomplishments! I don't hold a candle to such. No one can "out-theologize" a Jesuit. All of those organizations you mention whether Protestant or Catholic are just alike. They are ecumenical. So, saying you're a Catholic or a Protestant doesn't have distinct meaning anymore because they all serve the same councils/god . What makes a Christian a true Christian is born again salvation through Jesus Christ. Not religion. It's a supernatural change that God does to a person when they get saved - a point when a sinner believes he has nothing to offer God and believes (fully trusting alone) on the finished work of Jesus Christ. This can happen to anyone anywhere. But what usually keeps a soul from believing the gospel is the plethora of false gospels and Jesus's flooding this world. Religion is man-made. The Lord wants us to have a relationship with Him, not religion. If you want to serve the RCC by being an "ex-Evangelical turned Catholic", then there are many scholarships and opportunities laid before you and hence much fame and honor to be had. However, if you repent of your religion before God and choose to obey Him only, then this world has nothing to offer you. Luke 6:26 "Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets." Matthew 23:15 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."

  • @MrJohnmartin2009
    @MrJohnmartin2009 8 днів тому

    Maybe the devil thought his kingdom of hell was his alternative exalted vocation where he really was Lord over his own kingdom. Those in hell serve the devil imitating the saints in an inverted way who serve the Lord in heaven. The angel's permanent exile caused the Lord's permanent loss of extrinsic glory, causing God a permanent loss. In this way the devil did gain some victory over God. The mystery of iniquity does include the divine participation in the loss of angels who permanently fell into perdition.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 8 днів тому

      Did you watch the video?

    • @MrJohnmartin2009
      @MrJohnmartin2009 8 днів тому

      @@NuLeif My observations are consistent with the devil's fall through envy. A desire to destory God's plan for man can include a desire to remove God's glory by the angel's fall. Ironically humanity's glory includes enthronement on the thrones lost by the angels.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 8 днів тому

      @@MrJohnmartin2009 Did you watch the video? Or are you just commenting?

    • @MrJohnmartin2009
      @MrJohnmartin2009 8 днів тому

      @@NuLeif I watched the video and made a comment. The reasons for the devils fall are multiple. The devil is the Lord of the world in competition with God. Several titles of the evil one are given in competition with Jesus such as the light bearer and Prince indicating the devil imitates God in his diabolic kingdom of iniquity.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 8 днів тому

      “The ruler of this world has been condemned” John 16:10

  • @NuLeif
    @NuLeif 8 днів тому

    Interesting insight and great explanation that finally makes sense. I read a little bit of this a year ago when I was reading about angels (Aquinas) Thank you!

  • @pete8684
    @pete8684 8 днів тому

    The question I am left scratching my head now with, what is the prime mover that moves one to envy if made sinless. Back to Freewill? The absence of the beatific vision would indicate that each creature is given a test to essentially accept God's will or reject it. Thus, the test is to trust God but without having full knowledge of what it means to not trust in God. It is said that the angels were not able to repent but man has a finite life to repent. These are just my random thoughts.

    • @midairfortress-revert
      @midairfortress-revert 6 днів тому

      there's a reason why it's nearly universally referred to as the *mystery* of evil. Like many (all?) of the most profound truths of the faith, I think no matter how deeply we analyze the issue of Satan's fall we're left with incomplete understanding. Thank you very much for your insightful comments.

  • @Ohyet0210
    @Ohyet0210 8 днів тому

    "Thank you, brother, for this presentation. God bless."🙏

  • @BensWorkshop
    @BensWorkshop 8 днів тому

    Is this a re upload?

    • @midairfortress-revert
      @midairfortress-revert 8 днів тому

      Yes - we had some issues with the original video

    • @BensWorkshop
      @BensWorkshop 8 днів тому

      @@midairfortress-revert Many thanks. It was starting to sound familiar....

  • @flipneleanor7370
    @flipneleanor7370 8 днів тому

    Great video. The only thing I disagree with is that you briefly talked about Adam and Eve eating the fruit. I truly believe that entire passage was telling us that Satan seduced Eve and she bore Cain. That's why punishment for eating the fruit God punished women with incredible pain during child birth, and Adam would have to work terribly hard to provide for the family. How does that make sense as punishments if it's not telling us Satan seduced Eve? This is the enmity between the two seeds.

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 8 днів тому

      Two seeds as in Keith Lamb teaching? Do you believe in free will?

  • @Stephane.French.Catholic.An.33
    @Stephane.French.Catholic.An.33 10 днів тому

    before luther, there is his mentor : jan hus >>> hussits and about the dangerous sola fide (faith alone), here to all protestants : from the bottom of my heart and in all sincerity, stop believing in this sola fide, it is not the teaching of the entire Bible! Re-read Paul in Ephesians 2v8 and also in 1 Corinthians 4v7, he clearly says that faith is a gift, it is BY GRACE OF GOD that we HAVE faith! and 1 Corinthians 4v7 highlights these 2 things: HAVING and RECEIVING, and of these 2 things RECEIVING is more important because it makes you understand that THE SOURCE of “your” faith is THE GRACE OF GOD and this faith is not of none of us otherwise we fall into pride. Ephesians 2v8 = 1 Corinthians 4v7 but also John 6v37 - 6v44. (the proud one in Ezekiel 28v1 to 19 description of how lucifer became satan). <<< therefore Luther has indeed fallen into the pride of Satan with his sola fide, it's so dangerous for all of you protestants ! please comes or returns Catholic, you'll be under THE GRACE OF GOD FIRST not sola fide. Please share this comment, get your friends out of Luther's errors with his sola fide which he put before the GRACE OF GOD and which caused him to fall into pride like Paul said it in all the chapters that I have cited to you, but there are so many others which prove that the GRACE OF GOD SURPASSES ALL THINGS! If you want a process for all of this >>> THE GRACE OF GOD produces faith, works in Christ, charity, love, mercy etc... (see Galatians 5v22 to know what THE GRACE OF GOD produces )

  • @regularfather4708
    @regularfather4708 15 днів тому

    I am very blessed in my Protestant church, but the denial of the crucifix is just silly. I think the biggest reason we don't like seeing the crucifix is because that image confronts and convicts us every time we see it. People don't like being forced to look at Jesus as he takes the punishment meant for them. They'd rather think of the happy, cheery Disney Jesus. And I think that ties into the prosperity gospel and progressive Christianity. We want to be held and coddled like the lamb in the good shepherd painting. But seeing Christ crucified and facing the real consequences of your sin? Well, that might just transform your life.

  • @dallasbrat81
    @dallasbrat81 17 днів тому

    I wish Catholics online actually wanted to do something productive. If I was Catholic and wanted to reach others I would first focus on getting Catholics to actually return to going to Mass regularly and doing God’s will . all research shows majority of Catholics need help and focus too much on the worldly things . Show me a Catholic Trying to get actual Catholics back

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 11 днів тому

      You're right, in general. But the same is true of Protestantism as well. Too many are just going through the motions. However, keep in mind the fact that the largest and most productive charitable organization in the world is Catholic Charities. (Though the Lutheran Church charities is up there as well, as much so, maybe). Each of us should be willing to evangelize those within our own flocks.

    • @dallasbrat81
      @dallasbrat81 11 днів тому

      @@AmericanBerean Agree . I’m a ex Catholic married in Catholic Church. I believe there a true believers in every Church . If I had the power there would be fewer types of Protestants flavors like in past . Lutheran consider themselves “Evangelical Catholics “ Presbyterians are confessional and similar. Again baby baptism and Eucharist we share with Catholics. We love Mary and the Christians before Us. My eyes are only focused on Jesus till He calls me Home. The second or third reformers drive me crazy never mind the progressive church’s which are insane

    • @dallasbrat81
      @dallasbrat81 11 днів тому

      @@AmericanBerean Jesus told us to evangelize the world meaning the non believers and 33 % of world never has heard if Jesus while Jesus is going direct to them

    • @NuLeif
      @NuLeif 6 днів тому

      @@dallasbrat81what does this have to do with the video?

    • @dallasbrat81
      @dallasbrat81 6 днів тому

      @@NuLeif everything Catholics are hypocritic from top to down . Oh Mary worshippers please. Try being Jesus followers. It better to leave some mystery then to assume your correct when not explicitly taught

  • @davido3026
    @davido3026 17 днів тому

    Psalm 45

  • @rickswineberg
    @rickswineberg 18 днів тому

    The word "anti" in antichrist does not mean someone who is going to be openly anti (against) Christ. That word "anti" in the original Bible language can actually mean "IN PLACE OF". So could the bible antichrist be someone who has actually put himself "in place of" Christ? Well, we have further Bible evidence to support this. In 1 John 2:18-19 it says that there were "many antichrists", who "WENT OUT FROM THE CHURCH". In other words, John is pointing to the fact that those "antichrists" were WITHIN THE CHURCH!! Not only that, but Paul in 2 Thess. 2:3-4 calls the man of sin the "son of perdition". Now there is only one other place in the Bible where the name "son of perdition" is used, and that is in John 17:12 talking about JUDAS! And what was Judas? A professing follower of Christ Jesus. Someone who deceived from WITHIN the "church". "The leader of the Catholic church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who TAKES THE PLACE of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity." (John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, p. 3, 1994). "ANTI" - Christ = "IN PLACE OF" Christ!

  • @macbride33
    @macbride33 19 днів тому

    Belief and faith means to believe what He says AND to do what he says. He teaches many things and commands many things. If you don't DO them then you show you don't actually "believe" Him nor have faith in Him. You are under self deception. 1 John 1 and 2. To exit the Old Covenant, one must submit to the New Covenant, and it is in the blood of the cup and in His flesh He gives us. The Covenant is between the Father and the church of the apostles and Christ is the mediator. The church dispenses the graces of Christ for the sole reason of receiving the command to do so. He left a living breathing body on earth, not a pocket New Testament. The church produced the New Testament documents... not the other way around. We can choose to be partakers of that Covenant by joining it. But we cannot hijack it and claim it for ourselves or manipulate it or change it whatsoever. It is in His church and nowhere else. The one holy apostolic and Catholic Church of the apostles that was breathed on and sent by Christ with authority. This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that a man may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread* which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live for ever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.” The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?”* So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever.” - John 6:50-58 I didn't believe all I wrote as a protestant of 25 years.

    • @billlee2194
      @billlee2194 9 днів тому

      As a Baptist, I didn't even know it was in my Bible.

  • @billlee2194
    @billlee2194 19 днів тому

    Thanks for your recommendation of the Matthew Thomas article 'Justification'. In my nearly 6 years of trying to better understand justification, I found the article to be, perhaps, the most thorough, concise and useful treatments of the topic I have found to date. I have been asking God to help me better understand this topic. I think Thomas' article was an answer to my prayer. Thanks again and thanks for all the exceptional videos you have produced.

  • @tubinho79
    @tubinho79 20 днів тому

    Could you talk about the number converts to the Catholic Church in America, I've heard about an uge number of adults getting baptized into the Catholic Church this year. Do you or anyone knows anything about this?

  • @tubinho79
    @tubinho79 20 днів тому

    One of the best chanels out there. You speak with such clarity.

  • @tubinho79
    @tubinho79 20 днів тому

    No wonder there are thousands of protestant churches nowadays all claiming to have the truth. Protestantism is an heresie.

  • @Hupernike45
    @Hupernike45 21 день тому

    Does the catholic church believe that Christ is one person of three persons n the godhead? If she's the mother of God, is she also the mother of Yahweh and The Holy Spirit? If she is a perpetual virgin, is she still a virgin after conceiving Jesus' half brothers and sisters? What is the scriptural reference that shows that Mary is the mother of God? BTW, there is no scriptural reference to show that Jesus ever called her "mother". "The mother of my Lord" are English words Elizabeth didn't speak English. Also, there are many verses that are not to be taken literally. Jesus was fully God, and fully human. But it impossible for God to have a mother. Mary was the "fully human" side of Jesus" bearer. The second person of the Godhead existed from all eternity. Where was Mary then? Jesus had 3 hinges attached to His side. Where is that in the bible? It's in John 10:9-10, where Jesus said, "I am the door". Where are the NT verses that reference 2 Kings when describing the status of Mary? So, for 400 years, everyone missed Mary's position, no one, not even Jesus spoke about it, and then along comes Emperor Theodosius II. So, Jesus didn't think it was necessary for us to know about her importance, but Theodosius did.

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 11 днів тому

      Hi, let's delve into one issue at a time, so this one you ask: "Does the catholic church believe that Christ is one person of three persons n the godhead? If she's the mother of God, is she also the mother of Yahweh and The Holy Spirit? " The answers are: Yes. No. Let me explain. Jesus is a divine person with two natures (human and divine). He is God the Son. Distinct in person-hood, though not separate in nature. A mother gives birth to a person, not a nature. Mary birthed the person Jesus (God the Son) who is inseparably divine and human. So she is the mother of God (the Son), but not the Father or HS. In ancient times (400's? AD) a guy named Nestorious tried to say she birthed only his human part, so she wasn't the mother of God. His idea was refuted and condemned by the Christian bishops of the day. It's good to study early church centuries and the heresies of those times, so we won't be tempted to make the same mistakes.

    • @Hupernike45
      @Hupernike45 11 днів тому

      @@AmericanBerean I may be splitting hairs, but Mary couldn't possibly be "The mother of God". She was Jesus mother, but not the mother of God. The way we, as followers of Jesus, understand God, Yahweh, that is the godhead, is the first and the last and has no creator; the uncaused cause. Now if the term for Mary, the mother of God is just a way of saying that she was the mother of Jesus, I'll accept that. But technically, she was not the mother of the 3nd person of the godhead.

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 10 днів тому

      @@Hupernike45 No, you're not splitting hairs, but you are attempting to split JESUS! Let me try again: Jesus is one divine person (one of three persons having the self-same divine being, or nature), but He possesses two natures: human and divine. You cannot separate them. (As you cannot separate the godhead, since they're the one divine being). Where Jesus' humanity is there also is His divinity. He is God the Son. Mary birthed Jesus, who is God (the Son, not the Father nor the HS), was God from the moment of His conception, so, by the action and grace of God, she is the mother of God (the Son). No, it's not humanly possible, just as creation from nothing is not humanly possible. It's one of many big fat miracles! But, consider, how when we humans procreate, we generate a new human body, but that body's soul is not generated by us, God creates that new soul when the body is generated by us. A human is composed of those two parts, material and spiritual (and neither of those parts is a complete human person without the other). Would you say, then, that you are not the father of that human? Of course not, you are still the father of that person, body & soul, even though you didn't put the soul into him.

    • @Hupernike45
      @Hupernike45 10 днів тому

      @@AmericanBerean I am absolutely not the father of my son's soul. If I understand who Jesus is, He has 2 natures, as you say; fully God and fully human. Mary is not the mother of His divine nature. And it's only His divine nature that makes Him God.

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 10 днів тому

      @@Hupernike45 Yes, His divine nature is what makes him God. But being a mother (Mary or any woman) doesn't mean the spiritual part of her child comes from her. God puts it there. Nonetheless, she is the mother of that person, who is composed of matter and spirit. Just so, since God the Son took on His human nature through conception in Mary's womb, God the Son was in Mary's womb and with His new human nature was mothered by her. Therefore, she is the mother of God. The Council of Chalcedon in 450's AD explains it more: www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0451-0451,_Concilium_Chalcedonense,_Documenta_Omnia,_EN.pdf

  • @cskandrsgyrgy
    @cskandrsgyrgy 21 день тому

    When Paul wrote "not to go beyond what is written" (1Cor 4,6), that time the New Testament was not yet written. He was referring to the Old Testament scriptures, not to go beyond those scriptures, that is, beyond what we can prove through typological interpretation of Old Testament scriptures. If we can prove it through typology, then it is O.K.

  • @donia20252
    @donia20252 24 дні тому

    Wow, I just has this revelation, Jesus said He came to fulfil the 10 commandants and it took me so long to understand what he was telling us, He was only the one who passed 10 commandant to open the door to Heaven on Earth after spending 3 days in Hell and He closed that gate temporarily until judgement day. Thank you a Jesus for doing this for us, so we could gain His Forgiveness and MERCY. We are worthless sinners being given this opportunity to experience the mystical presence of the saints, Blessed Mary and Jesus Christ if we are lucky to see the King first. lol I met Blessed Mary first before Jesus. I pray to you all reading this to be blessed and recieve His grace. Amen 🙏

  • @alistairj4382
    @alistairj4382 24 дні тому

    Thank you for sharing this. Ive been wondering how to answer this questions regarding baptism isit important or not, baby should be baptise or not etc.. thank you again. Shalom from Malaysia

  • @Godfrey118
    @Godfrey118 25 днів тому

    Good video. But, Baptismal Regeneration is more of a tool for denominational triage. Everything you say is true on what scripture and the church taught about Baptism, but those teachings are found in the Anglican, Lutheran, Catholic, and Orthodox churches. You'll need other topics to further triage down the denominations to only Catholicism. It does thin the heard though.

  • @dantran1089
    @dantran1089 26 днів тому

    The typology of King Solomon/his queen mother and Jesus/His mother Mary is so laughable. Why? It's because according to the Bible's section of 1 Kings 2:13-25, not only Solomon denied his queen mother's intercession even though just before that Solomon said he would not refuse her request, Solomon further executed the person who had asked the queen mother to intercede! So come on now Catholics, do you really want to take your chance of getting executed by Jesus for believing you likely get what you want by asking Mary to intercede for you?! HAHAHA...😂😂😂... It's hilarious Catholic theology! 😂😂😂... Nice try.

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 10 днів тому

      Solomon did not deny his mother's intercession, he just denied that request. That is his prerogative. The queen mother is still an intercessor. For example, a later king did as his mother requested: At a wedding party, the host went to Mary with their problem of insufficient quantity of wine. King Jesus turned water into wine at the behest of His mother.

  • @user-zp1ec3ot7g
    @user-zp1ec3ot7g 26 днів тому

    The Catholic church is not what the early church taught. The early church was established when the Holy Spirit was poured out on certain Jews on Pentecost and then on the gentiles and anyone who calls on the name of the Lord. I prescribe to what the scriptures say and not to a catechism nor to what the "saints" have said in the past. What I see taught in the Catholic church is an outward manifestation of a religion and not a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. As far as the sacrifice of the mass it deviates from the Truth of who Christ is who brings salvation to the soul of man. It's not in a wafer(host) that can't do anything for the soul. To believe that bread is the actual flesh of Jesus and the wine is the actual blood is repugnant to say the least. If you drank enough "blood" and then drive home, see where you would end up.

  • @user-ov5zm5rz3v
    @user-ov5zm5rz3v 28 днів тому

    Even without such titles, Jesus is the eternal Savior, the King of the people, and above all, God. And before humans could exalt Jesus, the Father had already personally exalted the Son, another God. From the past to the present, humans have often tried to establish the position of God as humans, forgetting their own lowly nature. Isn’t rebellion enough? Is paganism necessary to exalt Jesus and his salvation? John MacArthur said that the Lord of Heaven has no other companion. This is because at that time, the Lord of Heaven in the Levant was considered to be Baal. Baal had a wife named Anat, but the problem was that Anat was also Baal’s sister. It is impossible to worship Baal and Anat at the same time in Israel. However, a temple for Yahweh and his wife Asherah has already been discovered in the ruins of the high places in northern Israel, not in Jerusalem. This is evidence of another form of pagan idolatry invading. Originally, the companion of 'Queen of Heaven Asherah' was 'Whitebeard El', the father of all the gods of Canaan. The El faith was already a declining faith at the time when Baal faith was prevalent, and it was on the same level as the Greek Cronus and Roman Sarturnus faiths. This faith in El later became Yahweh-Asherah as it competed and merged with the Yahweh worship of the Israelites who entered Canaan. In fact, the Old Testament prophet Elijah confronted hundreds of Baal priests and Asherah priests. At that time, Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, was also the daughter of the priest-king of Baal. In the first place, the process of combining a family in polytheism and worshiping them as a package or putting forward one representative among them often appeared in the form of religious fusion along with political unification. The problem is that such an evil attempt occurred in Christianity. Do you know Pontifax Maximus? It is the title used for the highest leader of the Roman priesthood. This Pontifax Maximus is elected and holds office for life. The purpose of this office is to be the head and spokesman of the priests of all religions that have temples within the Roman territory, and to represent the opinions of the diviners of the state as the head of their opinions. Is this a title befitting the head of the Christian religion, which serves only one Creator????

    • @HAL9000-su1mz
      @HAL9000-su1mz 21 день тому

      John MacArthur is controlled by Satan.

  • @neilhaverly4117
    @neilhaverly4117 28 днів тому

    There's a major reason why Many, of the other seventy nations who were not given the law, traced the Royal line from the maternal line and not the paternal line. Afterall when push comes to shove you can only be certain of who the mother is without a DNA test. They were always known as being the Queen mothers.

  • @burkeiowa
    @burkeiowa 28 днів тому

    An empty cross doesn't imply resurrection. Show me even one of the estimated 100,000+ people that the Romans crucified that is still on their cross. The victims didn't remain on their crosses. With Jesus, there was the good thief and the other one. Even that other one has an empty cross at this point. But the tomb of Jesus is empty. Jesus depicted in a crucifix makes clear which cross and that it is the cross of Jesus we are dealing with. It shows his choice to offer himself for us, enduring excruciating torture to the the point of death, in a manner pointed to from scripture. Can one show a manger scene with Jesus as an infant without being told that Jesus isn't an infant anymore? Why must we only get to depict his absence, and no part of his life prior? If we can show him as an infant or at other stages, then that time on the cross that is so critical to his passion seems very fitting. SO many things pointed to the Passion of Jesus, that it's clear that it should be a focus of our worship and attention.

  • @vintage53-coversandorigina37
    @vintage53-coversandorigina37 28 днів тому

    I wonder how God looks at Protestants constant blasphemy against the Blessed Mother. I’ve heard exorcists say one thing God does not allow the demons to do is to blaspheme His Mother! So how does He listen to their prayers or accept their worship based on this disrespect? Would appreciate any insight!

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 4 дні тому

      I know lots of Protestants (and married to one) and none of them has ever blasphemed Mary. For the most part, they are ignorant of her true status and just don't pay much attention to her for that. That's not blasphemy, just indifference.

    • @vintage53-coversandorigina37
      @vintage53-coversandorigina37 4 дні тому

      @@AmericanBerean true, my mistake to generalize. Thanks for the comment!!

  • @davidgravy2007
    @davidgravy2007 28 днів тому

    I think they just intuit that there's something wrong with Roman Catholicism, which there is, but they don't understand what it is, so they grasp for straws and end up inventing an empty religion from scratch.

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 28 днів тому

      There are almost as many proddy sects and beliefs as there are heads; this one will not admit Baptism; that one rejects the Sacrament of the altar; another places another world between the present one and the day of judgment; some teach that Jesus Christ is not God. There is not an individual, however clownish he may be, who does not claim to be inspired by the Holy Ghost, and who does not put forth as prophecies his ravings and dreams. they are purveyors of ‘self-centered worship.' You may get people to come to those churches, and you may have church growth. But you will not have church impact. The reason is that church becomes increasingly like the culture. People go in, see a skit, listen to some music, hear a soothing sermon, and think they have done their Christian duty. They are entering the exact precarious position the mainline found itself in the '60s and '70s." if salvation is by "faith only" it excludes even faith gained by reading the Bible.

    • @HAL9000-su1mz
      @HAL9000-su1mz 21 день тому

      Why do you hate Christ? Is He not your Savior?

  • @vanzealotbush2244
    @vanzealotbush2244 29 днів тому

    As a former protestant (pentecostal), I must say, "If today you hear His voice, harden not your heart." Thus says the Lord.

  • @one4jesus898
    @one4jesus898 29 днів тому

    Why such a desire to defend Mary as queen of heaven ? And have statues of Mary carried around in percessions especially by pope John Paul 11 all over the world....that's not honor and worship? God doesn't have a queen next to him he has a lamb resurrected from the dead Go to southern Italy they worship Mary more then Jesus The sick need a doctor A broken car needs a mechanic Only a sinner needs a savior Luke 1:46-47 KJV [46] And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, [47] And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour.

    • @petros-estin-petra-
      @petros-estin-petra- 28 днів тому

      Do you need to be burned in order to be saved out of a burning House?

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 28 днів тому

      Revelation 12 has nothing to do with Mary, but is simply and solely about the Church. He may even, as countless Fundamentalists do Fundamentalists do, inform me that the book of Revelation is actually Church history forecast in symbols. Such reasoning reminds me of a paradox. Fundamentalist exegetes can see invading Muslim hordes, Soviet helicopters, European economic communities, Bill Clinton and Mikhail Gorbachev in the book of Revelation. It’s all crystal-clear, and it was certainly obvious to John. But when the text speaks of a woman closely linked to the Ark of the Covenant (Rev. 11:19), a woman who is pregnant and gives birth to a male child who will rule all the nations with an iron scepter (Rev. 12:5), it, of course, can’t possibly be connected in the writer’s mind with Mary. Nor can it mean that this same woman and mother is understood as an image of the Church. Nah. That’s an absurd meaning foisted on the text by Catholics. The woman spoken of in Revelation 12 is Mary. A few observations: • The woman is a great sign and appears in heaven. This is the Catholic view of Mary--that she has an important role in heaven and in the plan of redemption. • She is clothed with the sun, has the moon under her feet, and a crown of 12 stars. In the passage in Gen 37:9-10 the sun, moon and stars bow down to Joseph. This point is often missed by commentators. Therefore, Mary has a role similar to Joseph's in providing redemption to God's people. Joseph "saved" the Israelites and ruled over them just as Mary "saves" the church and rules over it. • Mary gives birth to the Messiah. This is the only literal meaning of the text. • Satan was cast down to earth as a result of events surrounding Christ's birth. Satan went after the child Jesus with a vengeance as we see in Herod's decree to kill the children. • Mary escapes to the desert--to Egypt, for safety and to protect Jesus. She was there for three and a half years. • Jesus was snatched up to God and His throne at His ascension. • Satan was unable to harm the child Jesus so he went off to destroy the rest of Mary's offspring. Notice who these are--those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus. Mary's other offspring are the church. She had no other children other than Jesus. She is the spiritual mother of the church. Some might object to this interpretation, but it the most obvious and literal meaning of the text. To interpret it otherwise is to allow a preconceived belief to guide the interpretation. The pangs of the woman, however, need not have been physical pain. St. Paul, for example, used birth pangs to describe his own agony until Christ be formed in his disciples (see Gal 4:19). Thus, the suffering of the woman could describe the suffering of a soul--the suffering that Mary knew, at the foot of the cross, as she became the mother of all "beloved disciples" (see Jn 19:25-27)" She should concede to what she does not by the convictions of her Catholic beliefs and true devotion to Mary what she does not agree with, so as not to risk appearing disingenuous to those of Faith backgrounds who do not acknowledge the full glories of Mary, The Virgin Mother of God? All Marian Doctrines are based on solid, not loose, Scriptural grounds; some of the understanding of which is blocked by the hardness of our hearts, how could we remain blind to the relation of the Assumption of Mary to the Ascension of The Lord Jesus? How could we error in believing in The Immaculate Conception of The Lord Jesus but deny the same of His own Mother? Especially, when the messenger Angel Gabriel who stood before the throne of The Most High God calls her "Full of Grace", how do we depreciate what God has spoken? As He has spoken so it has been written, in the Scriptures, in the hearts of all mankind, that we are to call her: Blessed! Mother! please pray for us! As our Mother she herself tells us to do this in the Scriptures...what scripture do you read that tells you that if Mary pleads for you as her son which you are, that the Triune all loving and all Merciful God will shun her? Where have you people gotten these ideas? Most of them were unheard of until, who came along? Was it a new prophet foretold of in Scripture? Luther? William of Orange? You or I as long as we claim sola scriptura?

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 28 днів тому

      The Catholic Church says that Mary was preserved free from sin by God in order to PREPARE her to conceive and give birth to His Son Jesus Christ. Jesus is NOT like any other human being. He is INFINITELY HOLY (just like His heavenly father). And so the woman who would have the privilege of conceiving Him in her womb CAN'T be like any other woman in the world; she has to be DIFFERENT from every other woman by being SANCTIFIED and PURIFIED in order to prepare her for this task. Therefore, it is DISRESPECTFUL to the dignity and sanctity of Jesus Christ to say that He can be conceived in the womb of a SINFUL woman. Also, when we say that Mary is SINLESS, we are NOT saying that she didn't need a SAVIOUR. How do you think she became sinless in the first place ? Do you think it was by her OWN power? No. It was by the GRACE of Jesus Christ. In other words, God SAVED her by giving her an abundance of GRACE: "Hail Mary, FULL of grace, the Lord is with you" (Luke 1:28) and it is this grace that SAVED her by preserving her from sin. Mary had a SAVIOUR, and that is the reason why she was sinless. If she didn't have a Saviour, she couldn't have remained free from sin because she wouldn't have the grace to make it possible. The work of a SAVIOUR is not only to save people AFTER they have become sinners. A SAVIOUR can also preserve or protect a person from falling into sin in the first place so that such a person never even becomes a sinner in the first place. The Bible confirms that God has the power to prevent someone from falling into sin (Jude 1:24). Lastly, to say that someone is SINLESS does NOT mean that such a person is EQUAL to Jesus Christ. For instance, we know that the angels in heaven are SINLESS, but that doesn't make them equal to God or equal to Jesus Christ

    • @one4jesus898
      @one4jesus898 28 днів тому

      @petros-estin-petra- well no but people who haven't sinned still need to Believe in Jesus to be saves Romans 5:12, 14 KJV [12] Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: [14] Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

    • @one4jesus898
      @one4jesus898 28 днів тому

      @@bibleman8010 very well explained...thank you....I can agree with what you've presented

  • @approvedofGod
    @approvedofGod 29 днів тому

    Are you saved? Have you been born again of the Spirit? God calls all of us to repentance.

    • @geoffjs
      @geoffjs 29 днів тому

      Asking are you saved is Protestant nonsense, as St Paul says that he is working in fear & trembling for his salvation Phil 2:12. Have you heard of the sin of presumption?

    • @approvedofGod
      @approvedofGod 29 днів тому

      @@geoffjs Just as I thought! You are not saved.

    • @geoffjs
      @geoffjs 29 днів тому

      @@approvedofGod I was born again but my salvation is a work in progress!

    • @petros-estin-petra-
      @petros-estin-petra- 28 днів тому

      Everyone who is validly baptized in the Name of the Triune God is saved and receives the Holy Spirit _And Peter said to them, "Repent and _*_be baptized_*_ every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ _*_for the forgiveness of your sins_*_ , and _*_you will receive_*_ the gift of the _*_Holy Spirit_*_ ._ Acts 2:38 ESV

    • @approvedofGod
      @approvedofGod 28 днів тому

      @@petros-estin-petra- Are you talking about "infant baptism?"

  • @hglundahl
    @hglundahl 29 днів тому

    I've already answered it in "The Duchess of Dorchester and the Queen of Heaven" greatbishopofgeneva.blogspot.com/2023/06/jeremias-7-and-44-and-duchess-of.html

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 28 днів тому

      Revelation 12 has nothing to do with Mary, but is simply and solely about the Church. He may even, as countless Fundamentalists do Fundamentalists do, inform me that the book of Revelation is actually Church history forecast in symbols. Such reasoning reminds me of a paradox. Fundamentalist exegetes can see invading Muslim hordes, Soviet helicopters, European economic communities, Bill Clinton and Mikhail Gorbachev in the book of Revelation. It’s all crystal-clear, and it was certainly obvious to John. But when the text speaks of a woman closely linked to the Ark of the Covenant (Rev. 11:19), a woman who is pregnant and gives birth to a male child who will rule all the nations with an iron scepter (Rev. 12:5), it, of course, can’t possibly be connected in the writer’s mind with Mary. Nor can it mean that this same woman and mother is understood as an image of the Church. Nah. That’s an absurd meaning foisted on the text by Catholics. The woman spoken of in Revelation 12 is Mary. A few observations: • The woman is a great sign and appears in heaven. This is the Catholic view of Mary--that she has an important role in heaven and in the plan of redemption. • She is clothed with the sun, has the moon under her feet, and a crown of 12 stars. In the passage in Gen 37:9-10 the sun, moon and stars bow down to Joseph. This point is often missed by commentators. Therefore, Mary has a role similar to Joseph's in providing redemption to God's people. Joseph "saved" the Israelites and ruled over them just as Mary "saves" the church and rules over it. • Mary gives birth to the Messiah. This is the only literal meaning of the text. • Satan was cast down to earth as a result of events surrounding Christ's birth. Satan went after the child Jesus with a vengeance as we see in Herod's decree to kill the children. • Mary escapes to the desert--to Egypt, for safety and to protect Jesus. She was there for three and a half years. • Jesus was snatched up to God and His throne at His ascension. • Satan was unable to harm the child Jesus so he went off to destroy the rest of Mary's offspring. Notice who these are--those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus. Mary's other offspring are the church. She had no other children other than Jesus. She is the spiritual mother of the church. Some might object to this interpretation, but it the most obvious and literal meaning of the text. To interpret it otherwise is to allow a preconceived belief to guide the interpretation. The pangs of the woman, however, need not have been physical pain. St. Paul, for example, used birth pangs to describe his own agony until Christ be formed in his disciples (see Gal 4:19). Thus, the suffering of the woman could describe the suffering of a soul--the suffering that Mary knew, at the foot of the cross, as she became the mother of all "beloved disciples" (see Jn 19:25-27)" She should concede to what she does not by the convictions of her Catholic beliefs and true devotion to Mary what she does not agree with, so as not to risk appearing disingenuous to those of Faith backgrounds who do not acknowledge the full glories of Mary, The Virgin Mother of God? All Marian Doctrines are based on solid, not loose, Scriptural grounds; some of the understanding of which is blocked by the hardness of our hearts, how could we remain blind to the relation of the Assumption of Mary to the Ascension of The Lord Jesus? How could we error in believing in The Immaculate Conception of The Lord Jesus but deny the same of His own Mother? Especially, when the messenger Angel Gabriel who stood before the throne of The Most High God calls her "Full of Grace", how do we depreciate what God has spoken? As He has spoken so it has been written, in the Scriptures, in the hearts of all mankind, that we are to call her: Blessed! Mother! please pray for us! As our Mother she herself tells us to do this in the Scriptures...what scripture do you read that tells you that if Mary pleads for you as her son which you are, that the Triune all loving and all Merciful God will shun her? Where have you people gotten these ideas? Most of them were unheard of until, who came along? Was it a new prophet foretold of in Scripture? Luther? William of Orange? You or I as long as we claim sola scriptura?

    • @HAL9000-su1mz
      @HAL9000-su1mz 21 день тому

      @@bibleman8010 Rev. 12 about the Church. Hmmm. So the Church gave birth to Christ?

    • @bibleman8010
      @bibleman8010 21 день тому

      @@HAL9000-su1mz Quite often, fundamentalist flamers show up to unload a barrage. These people never respond to questions or objections, but only wish to hear themselves talk. It's much easier to make generalized, unsubstantiated claims than it is to actually track down the facts. Especially when the "facts" you claim are proven to be non-existent. 'Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment.' John 7:24" "A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion." (Proverbs 18:2) Proverbs 10:18 The one who conceals hatred has lying lips, and whoever utters slander is a fool. . In other words, you are simply reading propaganda. Not that you seem to have a particular bias (sarcasm). I am in awe of your arrogance. You sit in judgment, falsely slandering others, always excusing yourself in your self-righteousness. Hate to break it to all my extra holy protestant brethren, but "The mother of harlots" (not the whore) of rev 17 is the city of Jerusalem. Her 2 daughters are Israel and Judah, who played the harlot in their fathers house, her sisters are Sodom, Babylon and Egypt. Try reading the bible. When the Whore falls we read, "'Rejoice over her, O heaven! Rejoice, saints and apostles and prophets! God has judged her for the way she treated you'. . . . In her was found the blood of prophets and of the saints, and of all who have been killed on the earth" (Rev 18:20 and 24). So, the Whore could not be the Catholic Church because 1) it did not exist to kill the old testament prophets and 2) No blood is on the Churches hand with respect to any Apostle. Prophets existed as a group only in the Old Testament and in the first century (Acts 11:27-28, 13:1, 15:32, 21:10). Since the Whore persecuted apostles and prophets, the Whore must have existed in the first century and BEFORE. WHO KILLED THE PROPHETS Indeed, Jesus himself could not be any clearer in Matthew 23:37: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, killing the prophets and stoning those who are sent to you! Rev 17:5 "Babylon the great, mother of whores and of earth’s abominations.” 6 And I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of the saints and the blood of the witnesses to Jesus...." Rev 17:18 The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.” Rev 18:10 "Alas, alas, the great city, Babylon, the mighty city! For in one hour your judgment has come.” Rev 18:20 "Rejoice over her, O heaven, you saints and apostles and prophets! For God has given judgment for you against her.' SO WHO IS BABYLON - THE GREAT CITY MOTHER OF WHORES ANSWER REV 1:8 The GREAT CITY "where also their lord was crucified - JERUSALEM NOT ROME Passages of Revelation pertaining to the whore or the harlot makes sense when it is referring to ancient PAGAN Rome but makes no sense when Fundamentalists try to associate it with modern Rome. The passage says that the Whore will have power over kings. Modern Rome has no power over modern "kings", in fact there are almost no kings left in the world. Nor does the Church (which rests on Vatican hill outside of the 7 hills of Rome) have power over political leaders, otherwise ABORTION, PORNOGRAPHY, and HOMOSEXUALITY with HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE would not be legal in the civilized world. Revelation says that the whore was the center of commerce. (Rev 18:17-19) No economist today will say that modern Rome or the church is a leader in commerce. The US, Japan, etc are. However, ancient Pagan Rome was a leader in commerce. The Vatican is on Vatican hill and outside the 7 hills of Rome that that city is built on. And it MUST be noted the bibles including the KJV translate it not as hill but as mountain. Revelation 17:9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. Jerusalem is built on 7 mounts. One source, lists the seven, and explains a bit more of why some authors list different mountains, and includes a map: 1.) Mount Gared; 2.) Mount Goath; 3.) Mount Acra; 4.) Mount Bezetha; 5.) Mount Moriah; 6.) Mount Ophel; 7.) Mount Zion. The seven mountains upon which Jerusalem was built are (according to wikipedia): Scopus, Nob, Olivet, "Mount of Corruption" or "Mount of Offence", "Mount Zion", the "Ophel Mount" and the new "Mount Zion." Or perhaps interpretations are far more complex than the followers of Jack Chick might expect, Who knows? Perhaps the 7 mountains refer to the 7 continents. Perhaps the harlot is in fact apostate Christianity of a protestant variety. It may not hurt to look at all the possibility bu NO ONE should go about insisting that there interpretation against another faith is correct. It is too convoluted with too many possibilities. And no one should contradict scripture in their assertions. . In other words, you are simply reading propaganda. Not that you seem to have a particular bias (sarcasm).. Eph4:11. He gave some to be apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, SHEPHERDS and teachers

  • @edpie7759
    @edpie7759 29 днів тому

    A “false” Mary? Even if Catholics worshipped Mary, they’re doing so to the one who is the mother of God. Whom else could she be? I kind of think these armchair theologians throw extra adjectives into their rhetoric as little more than virtue signaling, and end up thinking they have sussed out some new point of doctrine. I knew an evangelical who was careful to explain the likes of Vishnu to his understudied friends as “the false god of Hinduism” as if Hindus knew Vishnu was fake but maybe thought Kali was real. And at that point it doesn’t make any sense. And beyond that point we find this “false Mary” and the accidental rediscovery of heresies like “Mary is the mother of human Jesus but not the Second Person of the Trinity.”

  • @teresabryson9657
    @teresabryson9657 29 днів тому

    Is:42:8 I am the Lord,that is my name, I will not share my glory to another,nor my praise to graven images.

    • @Triniforchrist
      @Triniforchrist 29 днів тому

      God Glory was inside the ark of the covenant between two Angel And those are scared image

    • @petros-estin-petra-
      @petros-estin-petra- 28 днів тому

      _Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you._ Exodus 20:12 ESV Is honoring your Mother taking away from God's Glory?

    • @HAL9000-su1mz
      @HAL9000-su1mz 21 день тому

      When you mature and embrace Christ, you will be graced with understanding.

  • @Downey-2000
    @Downey-2000 Місяць тому

    Right on brother. I have a question. What do you think about Jay Dyer?

    • @Triniforchrist
      @Triniforchrist 29 днів тому

      He is Orthodox, and mock the Catholic church and the saints, a very disgusting person if you ask me

    • @petros-estin-petra-
      @petros-estin-petra- 28 днів тому

      A deceived mocker

  • @andrewpearson1903
    @andrewpearson1903 Місяць тому

    The comparisons do prove too much, because Christ’s work intentionally sublimates many themes from Canaanite (and other) paganism. We worship a Son who effectively died as a human sacrifice (Molech), on a pole/pillar (Ishtar) set up in a high place (Baal), and rose from the dead in the spring, no less (Tammuz/Adonis). If the early Jewish Christians had had scruples about external resemblances to paganism, we wouldn’t be here. Our society is also so culturally Christian that we’re kind of numb to the weirdness of the core Christian beliefs. As a result a lot of people take trouble to strain out the gnat of saint-veneration, but they don’t even get heartburn from swallowing the camel of adoring a Man, who also incarnates a previously unheard-of concept of God. We have a very strange and beautiful religion, and we should lean into that instead of effacing it.

  • @andycopeland7051
    @andycopeland7051 Місяць тому

    Incredible video. Your observation of creative license as a storytelling device was illuminating. I myself didn't even remember the second gutpunch at the end. Thanks for sharing

  • @user-ov5zm5rz3v
    @user-ov5zm5rz3v Місяць тому

    In fact, the Trinity of Father-Virgin Mary-Son appears in religions much older than Christianity. Osris-Isis-Horus and above all, El-Asherah-Baal...... Rome dares to call Mary the mother of God because she gave birth to Jesus, but is that God Yahweh? Because Jesus, the Son, is also Yahweh. Just as the Father-Son-Holy Spirit, who are independent entities, become one and become Yahweh, the Father-Son-Holy Spirit are also equal Yahweh. Rome called Mary, who gave birth to Jesus, the mother of God, thereby making Mary the head of Yahweh. Is this right? Mary gave birth to Jesus as a human being, as a sacrifice to replace the sins of mankind, not as God. This is because Jesus’ origins already existed before the beginning. And if Mary were to claim to be the mother of God as Jesus’ mother, at least half of Jesus’ genes would have to come from Mary. Was that really the case? Jesus was born in the house of Joseph, the son of the tribe of Judah, in Bethlehem, the town of David and the descendant of Zavid, according to the prophecy, without any bloodline from either Joseph or Mary. Mary was chosen as Joseph's fiancée as a virgin, and this was the very reason she gave birth to Jesus. Anyone who was the fiancée of a young man from the town of David could have done so! This is why Mary's Immaculate Conception is meaningless. This is because Jesus was not indebted to anyone's blood in the first place, and was born solely using Mary's womb. However, since he had a human body, he grew in the womb of his mother Mary like a human! In other words, Jesus was not born from Mary. Mary was Jesus' mother. If you claim that Jesus is God and Mary, who gave birth to Jesus, is also the mother of God, you are denying Jesus' humanity. How is this different from Gnosticism?

    • @AmericanBerean
      @AmericanBerean 9 днів тому

      Jesus is not a human being. He is a divine being (God), and the 2nd person of the godhead (He is God the Son). Jesus is one divine person (one of three persons having the self-same divine being, or nature), but He possesses two natures: human and divine. You cannot separate them. (As you cannot separate the godhead, since they're the one divine being). Where Jesus' humanity is, there also is His divinity. He is God the Son. Mary birthed Jesus, who is God (the Son, not the Father nor the HS), was God from the moment of His conception, so, by the action and grace of God, she is the mother of God (the Son). He did get half his chromosomes from Mary. It's one of many big fat miracles! And that does qualify him to be the heir to the throne. Look at Jesus' lineages. You'll find some women listed in chain.

  • @billybobwombat2231
    @billybobwombat2231 Місяць тому

    Like watching kids fighting over whom has the best marbles 😂😂

    • @srich7503
      @srich7503 29 днів тому

      If truth were relative then i would agree.

    • @billybobwombat2231
      @billybobwombat2231 29 днів тому

      @@srich7503 I'd suggest it is relative when one takes the time to make a comparison video 🤔

    • @srich7503
      @srich7503 29 днів тому

      @@billybobwombat2231 I agree! There is always room for improving the human position of truth no matter which side you are on. So lets continue to compare till the “fullness of truth” does come forth. 👍🏻

  • @ddzl6209
    @ddzl6209 Місяць тому

    God himself employed Bezallel and Ohiliab to beaytify the tabernacle with certain images to maintain human artistic skills which is ingrained in human brain to appreciate the essence of beauty. Every catholic Church contains tabernacle alter menohra

  • @thepic12
    @thepic12 Місяць тому

    Another awesome video!