Відео

In Antarctica, next to Mt Rossman, depending on where the sun is in the sky.

I don't think you understand, this observation disproves the claim based on nothing more than position of the light source which we call the sun. It doesn't matter where it is or what is it, local or millions of miles away, a ball of gas or a NASA projection, this observation is still impossible in any scenario where the surface of the earth is flat. That's the ENTIRE point of TFE

@ Well you failed to prove it to us and you didn’t destroy the FE which was your main goal so your grand 1/2 million dollar experiment is a complete failure and you can’t admit it. The more you keep this up the more of us there are and will be. Stop lying and admit you mr experiment failed to end us.

@ by the way the FE is a multi light source model do you priced nothing by not disproving that too

You are just gulping down the maximum strength copium

​@@JohnThompsonthegreat TFE proved exactly what we already knew, that the 24 hour sun exists in Antarctica, disproving the claim of a flat earth. So it looks like it was a raging success ❤ There is no such thing as a flat earth model, and claiming multiple light sources is not only totally baseless and pseudoscientific but also doesn't account for this observation in the slightest

I think that this is called trolling. This person's youtube channel is filled with globe earth material - some of it is very good. There's even a video there about precession.

We're not. We're proving that some people are thick as pigshit.

It's in the southern hemisphere.

The camera does not turn.

Tell us you don't understand how a 360° camera works without telling us...

#RealityDenier

How does a 24-hour sun in Antarctica work on a flat earth model?

@@sallyside8855 can you Steel Man my argument? Do you know what that means? I wouldn’t mind discussing this with you, but I need to know that you understand what my argument is.

@@TravisEdwards-h1j No, I don't know what that means, but I would like to know how you think a 24-hour sun in Antarctica works on a flat earth model. I hope you can answer, Travis.

@ it means that you are able to articulate the best version of my argument. I just want to make sure you understand what my argument is. Let me repost it for you. “The TFE confirmed EXACTLY what we would expect on a Flat Earth… The camera tracked a moving sun circling above a motionless plane.. It tracked the sun just as it would of tracked bees, birds, planes, clouds, SUN, moon and stars.. They are all moving and the earth is NOT.” If you had to tell me what my argument is, what would you say?

It's been proven, and you just hand-wave away all evidence that proves you wrong. Lies, denial, and excuses are all you have!

Proof the sun is not a local light source here in Dave McKeegan's video. ua-cam.com/video/RjQCb2TUMIU/v-deo.html

Based on the title of this video and all the other footage of him talking about the 24 hour sun yes he does claim there is a 24 hour sun in Antarctica. What are going to do about it?

First he has to prove the light in the sky is the sun he claims is 93 million miles away in space and not a local light source as the FE says it is. He failed to do that so his observations are based on a lie.

@@xDAKPRODUCTIONSx well, that’s why I’m asking. If you are correct, he will have no difficulty to make the claim here in response to my question. I’ve just watched him on Flatzoid Perspective and in that stream he said “if there is a 24 hour sun at the South Pole”

@@ZestaBackfromburnout it’s not proven to be the sun as they claim and not a local light source

@@DamascusSteel-j1fEnjoy your copium.

The ETOPS rating of a 757 is 180 min.

Are you f…ing serious? This is all you have? ETOPS? 🤦🏻

@@DanDaMan73 Yes, this is odd too. Is he arguing that the plane didn't land at Union Glacier? If he is, then he has a lot of explaining to do

The ALE B757 ETOPS is actually 180 minutes and the alternative is Rothera. I’m a previous Antarctica Comms operator. Happy to answer any questions about flights in and around Antarctica. I know the place very well.

The bible is not a science book. God would disprove of denying reality

@@xDAKPRODUCTIONSx Your science is another religion and your science books are nothing but your bibles

@@DamascusSteel-j1f Again, just triggered, panicky responses to reasonable questions. You have nothing else.

The bible is a book of fantasy and shouldnt be taken literally. Its hilarious that most flat earthers are religious and think that them referencing a source written thousands of years ago by a bunch of men who had absolutely no idea about the shape of the earth deserves to be taken seriously.

​@@DamascusSteel-j1fGood job on demonstrating that you don't actually know what science is ❤

The lights are on but nobody is home

#Delusional :)

​@@muzikgodHe's desperate to keep his youtube channel going. Imagine being him right now? Pumping out video after video, only to be destroyed by TFE. How embarrassing.

@@gjw45 Yes, these people don't seem to have actual jobs, do they? They should learn a trade.

A yes, the local sun that famously leaves the orbital family between the tropics to circle around Union Glacier once a year just in case a group of people would decide to go film there. God really works in mysterious ways when he makes the world so easy to explain with heretic model and impossible to explain with the one true model.

You do that yourselves, Luke.

Look at the drone footage as it comes up and down. It's not completely level and hides the camp

Buddy…..Can you read? This was taken from a different location than all the other footage released earlier.

​@@ryhermThe guy thinks the earth is flat so no.....he probably cant

@@nikorn24 😆Facts.

Why would he go back to the drawing board if he's already succeeded? 🤔

Projection, the secret sauce of how flerfs manage waste decades of their lives feeding the scam they're themselves the victims of

?? You're going to have to explain that.

In what way do you think it was fraudulent?

Now tell us why

@@MarieIsHere-rg3bv well there was the nice comment I responded that had no insult, profanity or trigger words and it got removed. Long story even shorter. Not here to debate, or convince. Just stating my 2 cents. Everyman needs to use discernment, on their spouse, their car purchase, or anything else. Take care.

@@realicepick285 So in other words it must be fake because it does not align with your world view but there is no evidence

😂

Pigeons on a chess board claiming they won something is all you people are

@@DamascusSteel-j1f Again, nothing.

@@sallyside8855 Yep nothing is what you got

@@DamascusSteel-j1f #ChildMentality

@@DamascusSteel-j1f Well, that's not really true is it. We've got this video and the other time lapse videos. And then the non-time lapse videos. And the time lapses and non-time lapses taken by numerous other people over the decades. And in the experience of the 100,000 people who travel to the Antarctic to see the midnight sun every year. And in the experiences of the 100,000 people who will see the 24-hour sun in Antarctica next year and the following year and the year after that. And in the logbooks and diaries of all the explorers and documentary film makers who travel across Antarctica every summer. And in the diaries of Byrd, Shackleton, Scott, Amundsen, going right back to Captain Cook’s expedition in the 18th century… What have you got? Bad typing and anti-gay slurs.

Well, the target demographic of the scam is the unemployed losers who never leave their mom's basement so yeah, obviously they can't afford to take skiing trips :)

Thanks for trolling and supporting this awesome channel! :)

😂

Show you’re working

Are you that daft? Never mind, that's standard for a flerf, troll on!

Tell me what you see on right right side of the mountain starting at 0:49. 0:05 And do tell us how the shadow is up to the bottom of the tents in the back before receding when the sun stops casting a shadow from the back of the mountain?

You see the sun, then you are not in the shadow. Only when you go into the shadow or the shadow reaches you the sun is behind the mountain in your perspective. The distance between the upper limb of the sun and the profile of the mountain has an angular size, that has a projection on the snow lit by the sun between the camera and the shadow of the mountain. A projection means that a small angular size is correlated with a longer distance in the projection. You should calibrate your brain

😂

Or watch the sun rise and set over the horizon, which is only possible due to the earth's curvature! :)

Or maybe the fact that every observation fits into the globe model without having to invent things that there is no evidence of to explain basic observations. You have "it looks kinda flat to me" while the globe has every observation fitting without contradiction and is consistent with reality

@@muzikgod it can work on a flat earth. But only if the sun is outside of the dome and we all experience night and day at the same time.

@@billybobthekidiswack That's funny, but still wouldn't work, as there's no horizon on a flat earth.

An explanation of the world has more chance to be right if it explains everything with accuracy in every detail, both the ground and the sky, of if it needs to hide half of the world to give (approximately, more or less, almost) an explanation?