IL-8 - The Flying Tank Gets MUCH Better [War Thunder]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
- The IL-8 is a big enough upgrade in terms of armor, speed, and ordnance that it feels like a fairly sizable upgrade over the IL-2s that it sought to replace.
Top Tips and Tricks From The War Thunder Community: • Top Tips and Tricks Fr...
Top 5 Premium Tanks For Beginners: • Top 5 Premium Tanks Fo...
Top 10 Pro Tank Tips and Tricks: • Top 10 Pro Tank Tips a...
If you would like to support my channel, please consider subscribing. Thank you!
Join the Discord: / discord
Twitch channel: / tankensteinyt
Video Title: IL-8 - The Flying Tank Gets MUCH Better [War Thunder]
#warthunder #warthundergameplay #il8 - Ігри
![Full US Air Tech Tree/Planes Guide + Overview [War Thunder]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HkV9jRKPuP8/mqdefault.jpg)
![Full US Air Tech Tree/Planes Guide + Overview [War Thunder]](/img/tr.png)
Gaijin need to fix those base spaa in air rb they act like airfield spaa
Great review! I appreciate you exploring each of its likely battle roles.
0:34 " ah the good old "you vs. the guy she tells you not to worry about"
It’s a fat bus and only has two 500kg’s. The extra armour is not worth it
I've been flying it a shit ton of is far from a bus and the armor my god it takes more of a beating than my IL2
@@ajgurney5811 bro if you dive you need at least 700-900m of clearance to pull up. In air RB the armour might work, but in CAS it’s dangerous diving down
I still cannot believe that the IL-8 was designed without rockets in mind - its also sad that you cannot take 2x 250kg and 4x 100kg in the bay.
U can take 2× 250kg bombs, and 6× 100 kgs bombs(4 are in the bomb bay)
250kg are too big for the bomb bay and u never could carry them in the bomb bay in any IL series planes so idk why u say it's sad.
good review thank you!
Il think about it! would go well with the KV1E
KV-1E, SMK, T-34E, T-34 1st Guards, SU-85A, T-34 E STZ, BTR-152, SU-152. Solid 3.7-4.0 lineup options.
I honestly would go KV-1E, T-34E STZ, KV-1S, SU-152, IL-8 (replacing KV-2). It would certainly go there well (however, I suck at CAS....)
'Pard 40/70 also got bumped up to 5.3 for AB and 5.7 I assume for RB. At least it can still be used with M18s, but it seems the fully armoured Italian tanks are unchanged. It'll make the more balanced vehicles more challenging to play while discouraging use of the 'glass cannons' so I can see why they thought it was a logical idea
Notably, this one has the Vya-23 23mm cannons which have way better velocity and pen than the NS-23 !
what the hell did they do to base AA's jebus
Fuck! Right?
I noticed this last night when I was pilot sniped in my f84. Thought i was a player. Nope, it was aa. Then it happened again, only shooting my engine out.
@@jb7483I’ve got shot by a sidewinder from an AI f104, I’ve been trying to get it to happen again but no luck, I also saw it happen to a UA-camr 😭😭😭
My most recent "What the fuck was that!?" with AAA was when I was about 5km away, flying at +800km/h, and still got slapped with a head shot by the AAA. I hate it so, so, so much
Noticed that with my Wyvern of course after a popped a huge booster
If you think you can win a headon with an IL2 or IL8, you're delusional
Depend on your gun conversion and your opponent’s.
Even the IL 8 cant survived a bunch of well placed 20mm.
Those AA guns were boosted, I bet, to discourage strike aircraft from attacking bases. Those targets are meant for bombers.
If this thing has combat flaps they are probably unbreakable and would increase the turning time in combat dramatically. Have to use them in a way that doesn't kill energy though
SPAAs are super accurate
Italy stays suffering
12:40 the il 2 m82 only has 20mm’s not the 23’s like that
Comparing the IL-10 (1946) to the IL-8
The IL-10 is lighter, faster, turn and holds its speed better, although it has worse guns, it has 4 of them, it has a 20mm at the gunner and it has rockets
Tbh, all that extra "armour" doesnt mean shit, you'll still die to the first lonely, stray .50 bmg incendiary tracer round, either by your pilot being one tapped or the whole ass tail falling off, the armour is just useless
Both IL-10s are still a better option if you want a strike fighter, and the 500kg bombs dont mean shit when the TU-2s are right there just .3 br above it
You're comparing a 3.7 to a 5.0. Not even slightly reasonable.
Thise spaa are apparently Chris Kyle 😂😂
Casual kill steal at 4:25 🤣
should be added to main tech tree this is a cool plane russia have no good ground pounders compare to us in this battel rating only vehicles added now a days is avobe rank VI nothing second war
Hi!
C.A.S
meOOOOW
meow
hello there...
General Kenobi !
General user-nh6sr7dj2q!
OP-8
Honestly hate this plane. I tried flying it for 10 matches last night when I unlocked The test drive and it handles like a goddamn skyboat.
Sure it has really decent armor, but the primary issue is the fact that if you lose your speed it's all over and there's no real way to gain speed back as it's low speed maneuverability it is horrible. For a strike aircraft it's very disappointing. It can't even take out a base by itself. Honestly the best thing to do with it is to try to get in as many head-on conflicts as possible because you do actually outgun most opponents to a very fair degree.
Cry about it. Its not a fighter or a bomber its a STRIKE AIRCRAFT. USE IT FOR CAS, AND AGAINST GROUND VEHICLES.
Ah yes, another Defyn. Yeah, youre using an aircraft designed for ground pounding in aerial battles and getting your shit kicked in. Who the fuck could have figured that out...
Oh, right, common sense isnt common anymore.
first lets go