Dynamics: Transverse and Radial Components of Velocity and Acceleration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 кві 2020
  • In this video, we introduce breaking down Position, Velocity, and Acceleration into components based on the Polar coordinate system (uses r and theta rather than x and y). The two axes that we use to break these vectors into two components are called the Transverse and Radial axes.
    This coordinate system is also referred to as the "cylindrical" coordinate system if we include a "z" coordinate to measure the elevation of the target object as well. Here however, we only take a look at 2D, which means "r" and "theta" (without "z")

КОМЕНТАРІ • 91

  • @marc-antoinetremblay6539
    @marc-antoinetremblay6539 4 місяці тому +5

    I cant believe i’ve paid 500$ for this class, and this guy just broke it down in 15min, I really hope you are a teacher, might never need this again but im subscribing just to encourage you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Місяць тому

      That's very kind of you :) Best of luck

  • @AvoRothenstein
    @AvoRothenstein Рік тому +7

    I've been having a really hard time in dynamics and didn't understand the equations or what transverse or radial acceleration and velocity were. This video gives me hope. I can't wait to watch more videos.

  • @maksurdu9305
    @maksurdu9305 8 місяців тому

    OMG!!! I've been looking for this the whole internet!!! You're an amazing tutor.

  • @Oscar-gx2yf
    @Oscar-gx2yf 3 роки тому +2

    The best video I've seen on this topic. Thank you!

  • @amalsal9559
    @amalsal9559 9 місяців тому

    I came from an entirely different background and this surprisingly doesn't look scary at all. My sincere thanks and gratitude.

  • @charlesds1539
    @charlesds1539 2 роки тому +8

    Wow! You are very good at making things clear, thank you so so much!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      Thank you! I enjoy explaining things and showing how even the most complicated topics can be visualized and broken down :) Especially if you give scenarios where the knowledge is actually used and applied. THat's the whole point of Engineering anyways!

  • @Hariharan-ze3uf
    @Hariharan-ze3uf 3 роки тому +9

    Thank you! This explanation is so much better than anything else.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      Awesome I am glad :) I have other Dynamics videos too so feel free to check them out!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому +2

      I want people to actually understand, rather than just memorize formulas. Learning is actually fun that way...so that's how I teach!

    • @Hariharan-ze3uf
      @Hariharan-ze3uf 3 роки тому +2

      @@eng1048 Sure it is, keep up the good work bro. I'll check out the other videos and share it to my friends.

  • @marelleclejon6694
    @marelleclejon6694 12 днів тому

    This is literally the best video I've ever seen!!! Good job!

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 12 днів тому

      Okay, I said that before watching the full video, but I just got to 10:10 and my mind is blown, this is better than the best

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 12 днів тому

      I'm not even sure how I got through physics 1 without knowing the fundamentals this video is instilling in me now

  • @ProfessorDingus
    @ProfessorDingus 3 роки тому +1

    Lifesaver. My dynamics prof didn't cover this in lecture but gave a HW problem on it as if this is just obvious?!!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому +1

      Profs usually suck lol

  • @pratyushpathania7030
    @pratyushpathania7030 Місяць тому

    Beautiful video

  • @BODYBUILDERS_AGAINST_FEMINISM
    @BODYBUILDERS_AGAINST_FEMINISM 2 роки тому

    The way you talk is very relaxing.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      Glad you think so!

  • @OMARYassin1
    @OMARYassin1 3 роки тому +1

    Your channel is just great.. and your demonstration is very clear.. keep it up

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому +1

      Great man I really appreciate your positive feedback! I love teaching Engineering and I want things to make sense

  • @abirahmed6213
    @abirahmed6213 3 роки тому

    Really well explained man, appreciate it.

  • @ramyasrinivas3083
    @ramyasrinivas3083 3 роки тому +3

    Excellent explanation!! Thank you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому +1

      Glad it helped :)

  • @mohammadshabih5293
    @mohammadshabih5293 9 місяців тому

    thank you, this helped a lot

  • @yohannesabel7681
    @yohannesabel7681 2 роки тому +1

    you are great bruh!

  • @shashwatsharma9399
    @shashwatsharma9399 3 роки тому +1

    You made it very easy to understand 👏 thank you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      I am glad my friend :)

  • @Vincentvangogh65
    @Vincentvangogh65 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @himaniverma5504
    @himaniverma5504 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  4 роки тому

      Awesome! Glad it helped :)

  • @devesh5739
    @devesh5739 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir

  • @bhargabborah4194
    @bhargabborah4194 3 роки тому +1

    thank u so much

  • @ekminigodage2724
    @ekminigodage2724 3 роки тому

    BEST BEST BEST....Thanku so much for getting me away frm stress coz by this topic

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      Most welcome 😊

  • @thefuckdidyousaytomelittle7580
    @thefuckdidyousaytomelittle7580 4 роки тому +1

    Clear explanation

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  4 роки тому +1

      Appreciate it!

  • @OMARYassin1
    @OMARYassin1 3 роки тому +1

    Very great video

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @yesithwaduge4593
    @yesithwaduge4593 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you! ❤️❤️

  • @sophialindsay6253
    @sophialindsay6253 3 роки тому

    Thank you!!!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      I am glad it helped!

  • @duckie9923
    @duckie9923 2 роки тому

    THANK U!

  • @fredmwanainchi6295
    @fredmwanainchi6295 3 роки тому +1

    Thank You!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      you're welcome!

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 2 роки тому

    The resultant truly does have components

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      give a timestamp my guy, idk what ur talking about

  • @raghavkumar4914
    @raghavkumar4914 Рік тому

    Helpfull for jee exam thx

  • @Megha-rv2hd
    @Megha-rv2hd 3 роки тому +1

    Thx a lot 😇😇😇.. Very very helpful thing....

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      Thanks, glad it helped! :)

  • @rayd5173
    @rayd5173 2 роки тому

    Thanks it is well Explained

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      You are welcome

  • @titanblazer9112
    @titanblazer9112 Рік тому +1

    u r hero

  • @swaroopdewal4626
    @swaroopdewal4626 3 роки тому

    You have student from India. Awesome explanation 💙

  • @yourlifementor9869
    @yourlifementor9869 2 роки тому

    Thank You

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      You're welcome. can i get some advice life mentor?

    • @yourlifementor9869
      @yourlifementor9869 2 роки тому

      @@eng1048 Keep uploading this type of content 👏 👌.

  • @drlx8708
    @drlx8708 2 роки тому +1

    Great

  • @valeriehawkins5358
    @valeriehawkins5358 Рік тому

    Great explanation on transverse and radical components! It helped me out a lot. I wish you explained what you mean by "True velocity is always tangent to my path" though. In a different question (same principles) how would I determine the direction of the yellow arrow (drawn at 13:18).

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Рік тому +1

      To your first question:
      Remember, speed (velocity) is an instantaneous quantity. I can have one speed at one instant, and another speed at another instant. Even if my speeds are the same at two different instances, if you are facing (imagine you are driving a car on a curved path) different directions at those 2 different instants, your velocity (which is just speed but incorporating the idea of direction) is different between those 2 instants.
      So the DIRECTION of your velocity at a specific instant is basically "which direction am i facing/travelling at that instant". Think about this a little bit and hopefully the idea that "velocity is tangent to the path" will become more digestible.
      Your second question:
      If you knew the transverse (r times theta dot) and radial (r dot) components of your velocity at that instant, you can draw a right triangle and use the inverse tangent. Keep in mind that components of a vector do that tip-to-tail vector addition thing to add up to get the resultant vector. Thats why you can draw that right triangle between the radial and transverse component and the true resultant velocity vector. Once you drawn that right triangle, you can use the inverse tangent to get an angle for the actual velocity vector.

  • @billyandmandy286
    @billyandmandy286 4 роки тому +1

    yes yes yes el jef the machine

  • @abdullahjan861
    @abdullahjan861 3 роки тому

    Good vedio sir.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      No problem, thanks for your comment!

  • @tauseefshaikh7331
    @tauseefshaikh7331 3 роки тому +1

    At last....
    Thanks pal

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      Thanks for the thank-you!

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 2 роки тому

    00:00
    The object is the satelite, not the dish or antennae which tracks it.

  • @kawambwadaniel-kd3685
    @kawambwadaniel-kd3685 Рік тому

    Does each instant in the motion of the particle have its own unit vector?

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Рік тому

      It's more like this:
      For each instant of motion, the particle has the tranverse and radial unit vector, whose magnitude is a constant of 1, but whose direction changes

  • @only_one_edgy614
    @only_one_edgy614 3 роки тому

    how u are getting the positive and negative ...thank you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  3 роки тому

      hello Rafi, please give time stamp

  • @nf_mendoza9767
    @nf_mendoza9767 8 місяців тому

    Might just need a little more videos for UA-cam to recommend your channel 😮

  • @Megha-rv2hd
    @Megha-rv2hd 3 роки тому

    Is engineering and bsc both are same thing.🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @imback157
    @imback157 2 місяці тому

    Thank u sir for clear explanation but mixup hindi please sir

  • @successsteps1117
    @successsteps1117 3 роки тому

    🙂

  • @coolbits2235
    @coolbits2235 3 дні тому

    Thumbs up if you are watching this to understand orbital mechanics

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 2 роки тому

    Not a satelite

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      Hi, did you see my answer to your other question? :)

  • @fortrixtr
    @fortrixtr 4 місяці тому

    😢😢

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  Місяць тому

      You have problem?

  • @brentlackey8316
    @brentlackey8316 2 роки тому

    -7:38 True velocity? You must be an EE, I don't think that the Magnitude of the velocity is called the true velocity. It is not like electricy where you have true power. All part of the velocity vector are real. If you were standing next to this particle it would push you sideways. It you were above it. It would push you up. It's all real.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому +1

      The only real thing is the true velocity vector. It's another word for magnitude of the velocity. I like using the word true velocity because magnitude is used all the time by textbooks and professors. I like using different words to describe the same concepts to lend additional perspective.
      Here's what I mean. In the above video, I'm telling how we can take a velocity and split it up into transverse and radial components. Well, we could take that same velocity vector and split it up into x and y components couldn't we? We make the choice of what style components based on what situation we are in. If we were calculating what motor we need, radial/transverse is the way to go (because a radial/transverse approach gets us angular speed). If we were maybe trying to calculate the total distance travelled by a particle , x/y might be the way to go.
      So for this reason, the choice of components to use is subjective, it depends on the context. See what I mean? I try to remind students that the only REAL, TRUE thing that's going on is that you have a velocity vector.
      I think I see where you're coming from but hopefully I've illuminated why wording choice here :)

  • @bokyung8322
    @bokyung8322 2 роки тому +1

    perfect explanation! Thank you!!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048  2 роки тому

      thanks for the positive comment!