ENG104
ENG104
  • 102
  • 201 322
Testimonial - Zachary Moonab
Zach Moonab is an Electrical Engineering student at USF. I assisted him with a C Programming course
Переглядів: 67

Відео

Fellow Tutor Testimonial - Carlos Alberto Sousa Santos
Переглядів 7610 місяців тому
Carlos worked under me as a student tutor for the University of South Florida's College of Engineering
Testimonial - Joseph Ortiz
Переглядів 3910 місяців тому
Joseph Ortiz is a Computer Science student at USF. I've worked with him on courses such as Physics, Calculus, Objected Oriented Programming, Data Structures, and Computer Architecture.
Testimonial - Shawn Mishra
Переглядів 4510 місяців тому
Shawn Mishra is a Computer Engineering student at USF. I've worked with him in courses ranging from Physics, Calculus, Electric Circuits, and Computer Architecture
The reason you are not enjoying school (Engineering)
Переглядів 1,1 тис.3 роки тому
If you are discouraged with your Engineering classes, or just plain bored, it is probably not your fault. Many teachers do not explain things well; they use big confusing words, unclear language, and many times seem to forget that we students are just beginners in this! I show some examples of bad teaching so you know what to look out for
Why you should learn Engineering
Переглядів 7823 роки тому
We get so caught up in school and getting good grades that we forget what it's all about...Allow me to share with you the true meaning of Engineering, and why you should learn it
Engineering Project Breakdown - 1 - Automatic Laser Turret
Переглядів 6 тис.4 роки тому
Ever wondered how the math you learn in school is actually used? Ever wonder what Engineers actually do? Watch how trigonometry, quadratic equations, and derivatives come together to assist me in building this laser-shooting robot! Uses a Raspberry Pi minicomputer, camera, and laser pointer to "shoot" targets in the surroundings Intro: 0:00 Demo: 1:00 Calculating XYZ: 2:50 (Linear Ratios, Regre...
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Radial & Transverse Components - Problem2
Переглядів 1,7 тис.4 роки тому
Similar to the last problem except that we don't initially know the angle of the velocity and acceleration so we can't take advantage of it.
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Radial & Transverse Components - Problem1
Переглядів 9794 роки тому
We've looked at a problem like this before in the Kinematics section; we know the direction of the velocity and acceleration vectors, we can use this to more quickly solve the problem. The only new thing with this problem is that we have forces and Newton's 2nd Law
Statics Problem: Friction, Tipping, & Slipping - Problem2
Переглядів 2,7 тис.4 роки тому
Perfect problem that shows how tricky and conceptual this chapter can get. Remember to visualize what your math equations are describing, don't just blindly "plug and chug". These problems can really help build your analytical skills [VERY IMPORTANT]
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Normal & Tangential Components - Problem2
Переглядів 5584 роки тому
This problem is a basic Normal and Tangential problem. The only new thing you might want to put on your radar is using the derivative of the path equation to figure out an angle. We then use this angle to split the forces into components. We also use the radius of curvature equation and the equation of the path to produce the radius of curvature (needed to compute the normal acceleration)
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Normal & Tangential Components - Problem1 (Gravitron Problem)
Переглядів 9284 роки тому
Without a doubt you'll see at least one of these types of problems in your Dynamics class. It involves an object being spun in a circle at a great enough speed such that the static friction force is able to hold it in place and prevent it from sliding down (or up). This is the working principle of the "Gravitron" carnival ride Gravitron: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitron
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Rectangular Coordinates - Problem2 (Cords and Pulleys)
Переглядів 5684 роки тому
This is a good problem that has a lot of concepts in it, the most important one being that "negation" you must do between your Cord equations (which are based on variable "s") and your FBD equations (based on variables "x" and "y"). Overall with this problem, you'll get experience with 1) Free Body Diagrams 2) Using Kinematic Equations 3) Writing Pulley Equations 4) Writing Cord Equations 5) Us...
Statics: Friction, Tipping, & Slipping - Exam Problem1
Переглядів 3,1 тис.4 роки тому
Statics: Friction, Tipping, & Slipping - Exam Problem1
Dynamics Problem: Particle Kinetics - Rectangular Coordinates - Problem1
Переглядів 7374 роки тому
Don't forget that Chain Rule expression for acceleration! It's the key to this problem
Dynamics: Intro to Kinetics - Force & Acceleration
Переглядів 8724 роки тому
Dynamics: Intro to Kinetics - Force & Acceleration
Statics: Friction, Tipping, & Slipping - Problem1
Переглядів 12 тис.4 роки тому
Statics: Friction, Tipping, & Slipping - Problem1
Statics: Introduction to Friction, Slipping, and Tipping
Переглядів 30 тис.4 роки тому
Statics: Introduction to Friction, Slipping, and Tipping
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams - Problem2
Переглядів 8064 роки тому
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams - Problem2
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams - Problem1
Переглядів 3624 роки тому
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams - Problem1
C Programming - Pointers with Arrays - Problem
Переглядів 1524 роки тому
C Programming - Pointers with Arrays - Problem
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment diagrams Part 2 (area under the curve - definite integral method)
Переглядів 2,5 тис.4 роки тому
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment diagrams Part 2 (area under the curve - definite integral method)
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams Part 1 (indefinite integral method)
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
Statics: Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams Part 1 (indefinite integral method)
Statics: Introduction to Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams/Equations
Переглядів 3834 роки тому
Statics: Introduction to Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams/Equations
Statics: Introduction to Internal Loadings (and their Sign Conventions)
Переглядів 7074 роки тому
Statics: Introduction to Internal Loadings (and their Sign Conventions)
Dynamics Problem: Running on a Rotating Disk - Radial and Transverse Components
Переглядів 9614 роки тому
Dynamics Problem: Running on a Rotating Disk - Radial and Transverse Components
Dynamics Problem: Circular Motion with Radial and Transverse Components
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 роки тому
Dynamics Problem: Circular Motion with Radial and Transverse Components
Dynamics: Relative Motion between 2 Particles
Переглядів 9954 роки тому
Dynamics: Relative Motion between 2 Particles
Dynamics: Absolute Dependent Motion Between Two Particles (Cord/Pulley Equations)
Переглядів 2,7 тис.4 роки тому
Dynamics: Absolute Dependent Motion Between Two Particles (Cord/Pulley Equations)
Dynamics Problem: Find Velocity and Acceleration using Radial and Transverse Components
Переглядів 1,6 тис.4 роки тому
Dynamics Problem: Find Velocity and Acceleration using Radial and Transverse Components

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Rittiuu
    @Rittiuu 17 днів тому

    Which book are you using

  • @coolbits2235
    @coolbits2235 18 днів тому

    Thumbs up if you are watching this to understand orbital mechanics

  • @sazolbrb3290
    @sazolbrb3290 27 днів тому

    did you make it automatic

  • @marelleclejon6694
    @marelleclejon6694 28 днів тому

    This is literally the best video I've ever seen!!! Good job!

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 28 днів тому

      Okay, I said that before watching the full video, but I just got to 10:10 and my mind is blown, this is better than the best

    • @marelleclejon6694
      @marelleclejon6694 28 днів тому

      I'm not even sure how I got through physics 1 without knowing the fundamentals this video is instilling in me now

  • @jbragg33
    @jbragg33 Місяць тому

    Agreed, well said

  • @pratyushpathania7030
    @pratyushpathania7030 Місяць тому

    Beautiful video

  • @Francismwendwa-wr9zn
    @Francismwendwa-wr9zn 2 місяці тому

    Nicely explained

  • @imback157
    @imback157 2 місяці тому

    Thank u sir for clear explanation but mixup hindi please sir

  • @plucas2003
    @plucas2003 3 місяці тому

    Incrível!!

  • @LovelyShadesYT
    @LovelyShadesYT 3 місяці тому

    DUDE I JUST WANTED TO TELL YOU HOW MUCH I APPRECIATED THIS VIDEO 10/10. My college professors would just explain it the same over and over again and it never clicked with me why I would chose on method over the other. Like how you explained why u-sub would drive you in a circle and thats when you should be using the half angle identity instead. It finally all clicked together for me and I cannot thank you enough. LOVED THIS <3

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 2 місяці тому

      So glad it helped :)

  • @fortrixtr
    @fortrixtr 4 місяці тому

    😢😢

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 2 місяці тому

      You have problem?

  • @marc-antoinetremblay6539
    @marc-antoinetremblay6539 4 місяці тому

    I cant believe i’ve paid 500$ for this class, and this guy just broke it down in 15min, I really hope you are a teacher, might never need this again but im subscribing just to encourage you

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 2 місяці тому

      That's very kind of you :) Best of luck

  • @karlie7
    @karlie7 4 місяці тому

    WELL SPOKEN

  • @familylaptop-gw9ig
    @familylaptop-gw9ig 5 місяців тому

    what a greeat video ....thanks alot

  • @tristan8435
    @tristan8435 5 місяців тому

    Why do we assume FAC is 480? Because it appears in both equations? Is it just because it lets us solve both or is there another reason

  • @garrettgeffre1792
    @garrettgeffre1792 5 місяців тому

    You are a freaking unit. I’ve spent an embarrassing long time to understand this. I really wish there were many more videos like your in the world.

  • @sahibhara7611
    @sahibhara7611 5 місяців тому

    First video that genuinely helped me understand this. Thank you so much!

  • @etharhamid
    @etharhamid 7 місяців тому

    thank you this was very helpful

  • @yasminh
    @yasminh 7 місяців тому

    thanks!

  • @dangdangheather
    @dangdangheather 8 місяців тому

    literally my savior couldnt find anyone explaining this method well

  • @dangdangheather
    @dangdangheather 8 місяців тому

    shouldnt the moment be positive and shoot upwards?

  • @dangdangheather
    @dangdangheather 8 місяців тому

    shouldnt the moment be positive and shoot upwards?

  • @maksurdu9305
    @maksurdu9305 8 місяців тому

    OMG!!! I've been looking for this the whole internet!!! You're an amazing tutor.

  • @NamasenITN
    @NamasenITN 8 місяців тому

    As you did a fit, then why not matching the mapping between motor control angles and position on the image plane, by identifying numerical parameters upon a calibration procedure that does not require measuring lengths in the real world?

  • @nf_mendoza9767
    @nf_mendoza9767 9 місяців тому

    Might just need a little more videos for UA-cam to recommend your channel 😮

  • @kerogeorge372
    @kerogeorge372 9 місяців тому

    can you explain the last step where you got the final answer? the part where you did the matrix

  • @mohammadshabih5293
    @mohammadshabih5293 9 місяців тому

    thank you, this helped a lot

  • @sdsa007
    @sdsa007 10 місяців тому

    nice basic stuff, need to learn basics to understand Coriolis and Euler and centrifugal forces for earth dynamics... I was told centripetal and centrifugal are terms used for 'fictitious' forces in non-inertial frames (ie moving in circles) .... but the concept of normal you have shown seems non-fictitious to me makes perfect sense and I see it used to define Eotvos effect (an up-down force) in the context of gravity on an oblate surface....... the Coriolis force is considered 'fictitious' says on Wikipedia... but I think it too is an effect... related to independent movement on a non-inertial rotating surface... sorry if I am confusing people! But Thanks for keeping it simple!

  • @amalsal9559
    @amalsal9559 10 місяців тому

    I came from an entirely different background and this surprisingly doesn't look scary at all. My sincere thanks and gratitude.

  • @martynobrien6720
    @martynobrien6720 10 місяців тому

    Perfect inspiration for me halfway through my Mech Eng degree. Top quality video, keep it up!

  • @ghayaalshamsi4102
    @ghayaalshamsi4102 10 місяців тому

    LIFE SAVER, THANK YOU!

  • @BryanRodriguez-lo8bb
    @BryanRodriguez-lo8bb 10 місяців тому

    Easy to understand! Thank you!

  • @berkedikici1293
    @berkedikici1293 11 місяців тому

    How did we find the value of 32.2

    • @Sibyl9171
      @Sibyl9171 9 місяців тому

      Its the english unit version of gravity. 32.2 ft/second^2

  • @hemsagarjoshi2841
    @hemsagarjoshi2841 Рік тому

    Love you brother u deserve million of subscribes

  • @weilitan1329
    @weilitan1329 Рік тому

    neat explanation, tq sir. leant alot

  • @noyfbnoyfb1587
    @noyfbnoyfb1587 Рік тому

    Best video I’ve found to explain why the normal force is used in Frictional Force analysis for non-slippage and slippage conditions. Thank you.

  • @mrjabar6303
    @mrjabar6303 Рік тому

    Do applied force be greater than Maximum friction force , in case of tipping? Because the body does not move , please explain it?

  • @beckettakins6198
    @beckettakins6198 Рік тому

    Sprite!

  • @em2129
    @em2129 Рік тому

    Thank you for this great video. What exactly is the unit of the acceleration a = sqrt((a_r)^2 + (a_theta)^2) if a_r is in m/s^2 and a_theta in rad/s^2? Timestamp: 10:25

  • @WYN0302
    @WYN0302 Рік тому

    I'm asking for the book you got the questions from

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 2 місяці тому

      Hibbeler is the author

  • @abovewaters9556
    @abovewaters9556 Рік тому

    Nice video... Perfect explanation!

  • @kawambwadaniel-kd3685
    @kawambwadaniel-kd3685 Рік тому

    Does each instant in the motion of the particle have its own unit vector?

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 Рік тому

      It's more like this: For each instant of motion, the particle has the tranverse and radial unit vector, whose magnitude is a constant of 1, but whose direction changes

  • @thomasfrancescutti4799
    @thomasfrancescutti4799 Рік тому

    13:38 why is this the equation (defined from tipping) that has the relation for P & T that we would use for defining if it slips?

  • @raghavkumar4914
    @raghavkumar4914 Рік тому

    Upload problem of 200 puzzling problems in physics.... Ss krotov please... That may be required for olympiad or olympiad foundation

  • @raghavkumar4914
    @raghavkumar4914 Рік тому

    Helpfull for jee exam thx

  • @Gloryky88
    @Gloryky88 Рік тому

    Good but one mistake. When this box rotates, the direction of friction must be changed.

  • @ismailsevimli6424
    @ismailsevimli6424 Рік тому

    Woww I found it hahaha

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 Рік тому

      Congratulations!

  • @cgr3955
    @cgr3955 Рік тому

    at 10:16 I couldn't understand how it is perpendicular because magnitude of r_i and r_f are equal and 1, so isn't that angle being 90 degrees geometrically impossible?

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 Рік тому

      I think i get where you're coming from. The answer is that the very small angle in between r_f and r_i is soooo small (much smaller than the unit vectors of 1) that the dr is coming out perpendicularly from the r_i It'll help if you draw this one out yourself. Take an entire sheet of paper and do the vector addition: r_i + dr = r_f Make sure you draw r_i and r_f to be very big (relative to the very small angle d_theta). I think you'll see the 90 degree angle. Let me know how it goes

  • @MrCrankyface
    @MrCrankyface Рік тому

    This is insanely accurate to my experience as well, many teachers seem to be forced to teach rather than have a will to teach. A few years in and I'd say it's around 2/10 teachers that actually break things down and explain in a way a student can understand. The rest are varying levels of no explanations to bad explanations. Or the classic of obligatory(and expensive) literature which is written in such complex and ambiguous language that you need to have a fundamental understanding of the entire course to even begin to grasp the book. It's literally pushed me to the limit of burnout having task after task thrown at me with no guidance and lectures that barely explain the subject. Been looking at a few of your videos and really appreciate your thorough explanations, hoping it'll make it easier to see the whole picture.

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 Рік тому

      Thanks for your comment, what eng major are you in?

    • @MrCrankyface
      @MrCrankyface Рік тому

      @@eng1048 Not sure what the exact title would be in English but the rough translation is mechanical engineering with a focus on material science.

  • @ryanmartindale6598
    @ryanmartindale6598 Рік тому

    Just finished the video series for dynamics, this was awesome! Super helpful for my midterm coming up, Thank you!

    • @eng1048
      @eng1048 Рік тому

      Good luck friend, as you traverse into the Valley of Darkness. Be Strong