Part 2 - Kittredge Park & Romero Settlement Town Hall May 3rd 2023

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @katies101
    @katies101 Рік тому +12

    I bet once they finish all this the people who insist this was necessary no longer go

  • @davenelson2638
    @davenelson2638 Рік тому +12

    What is the $250,000 for? Typically when a plaintiff (that's the county in this case) pays a defendant (the property owners) to settle a lawsuit it is generally understood the plaintiff realized it was going to lose the lawsuit and end up with nothing to show for it besides a lot of money wasted. Forking over an amount roughly equal to what they budgeted to continue the lawsuit is, essentially, for the purpose of getting the defendant to cut a deal so plaintiff gets something -- anything -- so they don't look like the idiots they are.
    IOW, the county screwed up big time and it cost them a quarter of a million bucks, especially considering that a year or two ago defendant offered a free deal that county, in its hubris, declined.

    • @mr.balloffur
      @mr.balloffur 9 місяців тому

      250k is for the land she "sold" them.... In theory

  • @Justabitnosey
    @Justabitnosey 11 місяців тому +1

    You couldn't pay me enough to live in that house. I would have moved and let someone else buy it who wanted access. Let them put up with the lack of privacy, the litter and poo.

  • @rae-lynnflores9399
    @rae-lynnflores9399 Рік тому +1

    The way he expained settlement makes it sound like they are paying you additional money to purchase.

  • @jacquelynabrams-cu3og
    @jacquelynabrams-cu3og Рік тому +1

    I hate the fact that he is addressing everyone other then you briefly.

  • @carrieharris4812
    @carrieharris4812 Рік тому

    R they respecting the private property?