Vigano's Trial & SSPX's Favorable Views on Rome - Père Chazal
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- On June 30, 2024, during his sermon on the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, Rev. Fr. Chazal discussed Archbishop Vigano's upcoming unjust trial. He also commented on SSPX's disapproving stance towards Bishop Vigano. The SSPX seems more inclined towards the new Rome, possibly due to a secretive normalization process with Pope Francis. The sermon raised the pressing question: Who will ultimately judge Vigano-priests lacking true Catholic faith, Freemasons, advocates of the LGBTQ+ agenda, or the schismatics, liberals, modernists, and heretics within the Conciliar Church of neo Rome?
🙏🏻PLEASE HELP OUR CHANNEL GROW🙏🏻 . 👍SUBSCRIBE🔔
📌vocation
If you have sons who possess a deep calling to embark on a religious path and desire to be part of our community of seminarians and priests, committed to embracing a life of poverty and missionary work, we extend to you an extraordinary chance to live a sanctified existence and wholeheartedly serve God through the Traditional Catholic way of life, firmly rooted in the Sacred Tradition of the Catholic Church. For further details and comprehensive information on how your sons can join our esteemed community, we invite you to kindly reach out to us via email at
👉 marcelst.jude@gmail.com or mariancorpsinformation@gmail.com * Call : 0639991680637 * Our FBpage : / mariancorpsofst.piusx .
📌theADMIN
If you like what we do and want to support us, your donation will assist our team in keeping their equipment in good shape, fixing anything that's broken, and even getting new gear for future photo and video projects. While it's not a must, we'd love to have a gimbal and camera drone for our work in the Philippines. If you're interested in donating, you can use the links provided below:
Paypal1👉 rb.gy/ncv4i or
Paypal2👉 tinyurl.com/msffa9k6
Praise God for the good, faithful SSPX priests.
SSPX is in violation of the 6th & 7th Ecumenical Council, as well as Vatican I. Thisnis NOT a Catholic organization any more than the Eastern Orthodox who, also claim to be the faithful Catholic Church. You guys need to be more informed, less opinionated.
He's a MCSPX, not SSPX.
@@X.Z.-Qute what does MCSPX stands for?
@@davidlam6702 , Marian Corps of Saint Pius X.
Thank you Father God bless you and God Bless Archbishop Vigano
I'm not surprised surprised the SSPX have taken their negative position on Archbishop Vigano. I still remember Vigano' s positive support of the SSPX insofar as their worthiness of FULL communion with Rome, and now they distance themselves from him. More the reason for my support of Vigano and Ex Surge Domine!
$$PX works for judeo-masonry.
Thank you for speaking the truth. Please continue we need more priest like you.
All Catholics should listen to this good talk. Too much confusion online in general and not enough sense by well learned and fully formed SSPX priest.
My Dad and I entered the True Catholic Church thee SSPX 6 months ago. Thank you Lord for the Grace to see .
Pax
What you just said is contrary to the SSPX position. SSPX consider Pope Francis the Pope and to be part of the Catholic Church.
@@RainyGryphon
U didn't say the Pope wasn't the Pope. However if you read Canon 13 session 7 . It specifies that whomsoever changes the rites of the Catholic Church let them be Anathema.
The SSPX haven't changed the rites so they have continued the Priesthood in the Catholic Church.
The Bishops and Priests who have adopted the Nova's Ordo have changed the rites and go against the Catholic Church.
That's all.
Pax
@@danielkilpatrick3525 “changing the rites of the Church is vague” and complicated, arguably what has happened (I prefer TLM) has technically not changed, either way I am not learned on that. What Council!
@@RainyGryphon
A good SSPX Canon Lawyer to watch is Fr Hesse also if you watch Mass of Ages 1 you will see how not only in the Holy TLM Mass did the infiltrating Hirelings take out 87 % of the Mass as well as butchering all the Sacraments they also removed many orders of the priesthood.
They have set up a counterfeit Church using our Catholic buildings.
Your in the right place to receive God's Grace.
God bless U brother
Enjoyed listening to logiical point's from a truly Catholic perspevtive. Thank you
God protect the man that speack the truth.
Im expecting the newsspx and sedes will at least give credits to archbishop vigano for fighting the faith
I don't believe the SSPX will. As far as I know they are still working towards an agreement with Rome and how long does the SSPX think they will keep the Latin Mass when Francis is shutting them down. In my opinion, they walked into a trap .
@@dentryn4365 yes i agree with u about the new sspx..
Those of us "following" Vigano may appreciate how his sought to clarify the weaponised ambiguity Pope Francis is so imfamously known for in his offical documents, comments and actions. However there seems to have been an extra step his taken to illicit this recent declaration. Considering how sly our evil enemy is we must err on the side of caution when personally making grand sweeping statements that potentially lead to being excommunicated. But in fairness we must stand by him and not abandon him now either and pray for both Pope Francis and ArchBishop Vigano. We pray humility wins the day they can both resolve this sensibly because the truth is logical and seems obvious Vigano isnt the one whom should be on trial. So many other heretics to go after. I pray Pope Francis thanks Vigano for his good service in upholding Catholic faith not condem him to protect his ego and globalist agenda.
"If someone, for a reasonable motive, holds the person of the Pope in suspicion and refuses his presence, even his jurisdiction, he does not commit the delect of schism nor any other whatsoever, provided that he be ready to accept the Pope were he not held in suspicion. It goes without saying that one has the right to avoid what is harmful and to ward off dangers."- St Cajetan
Cajetan Commentarium, 1540, II-II, 39, 1.
Vatican I, Session 4, Chapter 3: "...we promulgate anew the definition of the ecumenical Council of Florence which *must be believed by all faithful Christians* namely that the apostolic see and the Roman pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that the Roman pontiff is the successor of blessed Peter the prince of the apostles, true vicar of Christ, head of the whole church and father and teacher of all christian people. ..."
While protestants hold all popes in suspicion or outright rejection, one can hold a pope in suspicion as it would not hold papal succession and primacy as a whole in suspicion, and thus wouldnt undo what St. Cajetan said, as it was post-Florence and obviously still doesn’t contradict it.
Thanks for quoting, but could you put the last paragraph in easier language.
@@pprzes01 Sure.
While protestants hold all popes in suspicion (or outright reject them) one can hold a pope in suspicion as it would not hold papal succession and primacy as a whole in suspicion, and thus not undo what St. Cajetan said.
Even though what St Cajetan said was post-Florence, it obviously doesn’t contradict the aforementioned from this council.
@@pprzes01It's pretty good as is, but hopefully you'll now better understand what he posted.
Who you are quoting is probably *Cardinal Cajetan not St. Cajetan (a different person).
I agree that your last paragraph is confusing. I hope that you are not saying that prots have good will in rejecting the papacy (they have not). They do not hold this or that pope suspicious, they right out reject the clear meaning of St. Matthew 16 "Tu es Petrus..."
@@RogelioCaballero-wv8ciWho are you, two month accountbot?
Mr ...who am I to judge embrases All religions that lead away from G o d
All ....exept the traditional Catholic Church, which he
h a t e s , as she holds the truth. Please remember to pray for him and his pairs, for their conversion. 🙂🕯️
It's not that difficult to follow Vigano' s train of thought and argument that from the beginning it was never Pope Francis' INTENT of preserving the doctrine of Faith rather to corrupt the Faith! How much evidence is needed It's in plain sight unless one refuses to accept the reality that is!
Except, if you look at actual evidence, Vigano is 100% in error. But if you just listen to UA-camrs who misinform and only provide partial evidence, a la Protestant, yeah, you can reach the wrong conclusions.
@@EdwardBray-i1w Okay, where is the error in Vigano's evidence? Is the error in the blessings of SSA couples Vigano's or PF? is the error in Pachamama in a Cathedral, Vigano's or PF
@andrewf.castaneda4695
A. Vigano has 0 evidence. I said there was a 2018 Vatican investigation to Vigano's performance as Nuncio and found disturbing actions. You can find it in Vatican website since 2018.
B. The statuette being misnomerd as Pachamama (which, FYI, Pachamama was Incan not Amazonian, but Taylor Marshall is not cultured, he's a xenophobe so there's that) is an artistic, indigenous depiction of Mother Mary pregnant called Out Lady of the Amazonia.
C. Pope said time, and again, the Church can not bless same sex unions, and FS states it. It goes into further as tp how the couple can receive a blessing and what type of blessing. Cardinal Fernandez, prior to writing FS, when he became head of the DDF, went on LieSiteNews and in an interview there clarified these distinctions, explained about all the dubia answers and reaffirmed the Pope's 2020 (?) answers on blessing disregular relationships, but they hid this for months... not sure why, may ask them why hide the clarification. So, overall, there is a lot of misinformation and calumny being propagated and clearly anti-Catholic.
@@andrewf.castaneda4695
Blessings of same-sex couples are not allowed. The document Fiducia Supplicans explains this clearly. Only individuals can be blessed, not sinful relationships. The Church cannot bless sin. Pope Francis has had to clarify this more than once for the people who’ve been brainwashed by anti-Catholic propaganda, even when it comes from Catholics.
What you’re calling pachamama was not pachamama. Taylor Marshall started that slanderous lie.
You believe the wrong people. You should believe Jesus, who gave Peter the Keys and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail against His Church. O ye of little faith….
Obviously, Francis doesn't consider himself as a pope. There's a number of symbolic gestures he did to show he is not a pope and that he hates papacy. Still, he needs to be formally removed.
Excellent sermon Fr. We all know that the pope does not have the Faith.
Someone who doesn't have the Faith cant be a member of the Church. So,how can that same person be its leader?
@@E.C.2Resistance theology is schizophrenic
@@Frank-828 I hold the Sede opinion but the way Fr Chazal explains it,doesn't sound so whacky. "The ones who are making a Religion of Sedevacantism are wrong." Fr Chazal is correct,even though I hold to the Sede thesis.
@@E.C.2 We have infallible certitude that the V2 claimants are not popes, since it is a dogmatic fact that the Church can't err. Holding steadfast to this truth is not "making a religion" out of it. Our religion is Catholicism
@E.C.2 , I'm someone in between the resistance and the Dimond brothers brand of sedevacantism.
Well, according to St. Francis de Sales, you can be quiet, considering your lack of Mission and jurisdiction.
The Pope also condemns those who are too rigid! Surely the Pope is not going to be too rigid in not accepting Archbishop Vigano!
When you say the “sedevacantist” don’t accept Viganò, which ones are you referencing? A particular order? Wonderful sermon! Thank you Father!
Sedevacantists never said they refuse association with +Vigano,simply,they say he's confusing. That's a direct quote.
@@E.C.2 Bp Sanborn was delighted by last Vigano’s statement. Don’t know what this Fr is about.
First of all Bp Vigano has not revealed if he has been vaildly consecrated as a Bishop. This would be the catholic way of doing things.
@@dawidtrybula Yes he needs to let everyone know if he was conditionallyConsecrated. Follow the example of +ABL +Thuc and +Mendez.
Vigano would do well to investigate and join SSPX and really reform himself.
This sounds like you are judging Vigani and offering him advice on how he should correct himself.
Sedevacantists have started new religion? What do they believe now? An elephant?