Here are some sunnah of the prophet(SAW) #...When ever the prophet is mentioned say (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) #...Dikir after every prayer/you can also add (wa bihamdi) and reciting *Alatul Kursi after every fard salah *SubahanAllah 33 times *AllahuAkbar 34 times *Amhamdulillah 33time #...While entering home syaing this supplication (Allahumma inni as'aluka khairal mawliji wa khairul makhraji bismillahi wajlana wa bismillahi kjarajna waaalla rabbina tawakkalna) #... While going outside of home saying this supplication (Bismillah tawakkaltu aaalallah wala hawla wala quwwata illa billah) #...When entering your home give salam even if there is no one give salam to your self #...Entering the bathroom with left foot and exiting with right *and covering the head and while relieving yourself sitting is wajib *and when relieving yourself don't face the qibla or your back behind it #...Entering the masjid with right foot and exiting with left and performing wudu at home #...Every muslim you cross by give salam #...Using meswak #...Using fragrence #...Reading Surah Khaf every Friday #...Dusting the bed with an edge of an cloth or bromm #...Eat with your right hand and share your food with the nearest person #... if any food drops of the plate pick it up remove the dust and eat it *after finish eating lick the plate with your fingers and lick your fingers #...Before eating and drinking saying bismillah and after finishing eating and drinking saying Allhamdulillah *if one forgots to say bismillah before eating or drinking say this (bismillahi fi awwalihi wa akhirihi) #... After finish eating sya this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil ladhi at amani hadha wa razaqanihi min ghayri hawlin minnee wa la quwwatin) #...Before staring any work or going to do something saying bismillah #...After doing wudu saying (La illah illallah wadahu la sarikala) #...While drinking or eating sitting is recommended and it is an sunnah #...Sleeping on the right shoulder #...Not sleeping on your stomach or chest #...Before going to sleep *sleep in the state of wudu *Surah ikhlas 3 times *Surah Nas 3 times *Surah Falak 3 times *Ayatul Kursi 3 times *And saying (Lailahaillallah MuhammadaRrasulullah) *And reciting Surah Mulk #...When going to sleep saying this supplication (Bismika rabbi wada tu janbi wa bika arfahu in amskata nafsi fagfir laha wa in arsaltaha fahfazha bima tahfaz bihi ibadaka-s-salihin)or (Allahuma bismika amutoo wa ahyaa) #...After waking up saying this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil-lathee ahyana baaada ma amatana wa ilayhin nushoor) #...After waking up doing wudu and put water inside the nose and blow it #... when wering cloths syaing this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil lathee kasanee hatha aththawab warazaqaneehi min ghayri hawlin minnee wala quwwah) *While wearing entire the right hand first and when taking of start with left hand same with the shoes Reference Sahih Al Bukhari: 12.28.153.168.183.216.217.245.568.3295.5010.5623.5628.5630.5631. 6293.6294.6295.6296.6311.6314. 6322.7393.7394 Sahih Muslim: 265.267(c).304.2018(a).2020.2024. 2025.2032.2034.2626 Jami Al Tirmidi: 14.1857.1858.1885.2048.2678.2689. 3426.3458 Abu Dawood: 2.30.51.4023.4141.5094.5095.5096. 5212 Ibn Majah: 303.307.3287.3288 An nasai: 259. Credits goes to Ismalic knowledge official Ranga nature English May Allah guide us and have patience and remember Your lord is not ONE EYED and to read surah kahf every friday Plz pray for palistine,Jordan,Syria,Iraq, Iran,Somalia,Yemen,India,China, Bangladesh And for this ummah Lailahaillallah MuhammadaRrasulullah
Jazakallahu hoyron sheikh Hamza Yusuf and to the author of the channel who is posting it. I'm from Uzbekistan and our aqida is based on teachings of Imam Maturidiy and Imam Naqshbandiy.
@@lordtaseen2947 You have the free will to worship and love anyone besides your Creator! I just pointed out the stupidity and the blindness of mankind! They think the Prophet or any dead Saint will intercede on their behalf. You don't have to loose your temper, but please, continue loving and praising others besides Allah. You will reap your rewards very soon. Good luck
Someone pls share this with Ustad Hamza Yusuf, "Once I had a dream where two waliyy sitting in a place in two big chairs like they are so honoured ones, then someone said Hamza Yusuf is coming and they immediately stood up out of respect for him" this dream is definitely a Bishara for Ustad Hamza Yusuf طول الله عمره و نفعنا بعلومه في الدارين.. I'm from India.
The division and conquest is clear when we see how the west divided Sunnis and Shias, Sufis and Wahhabis. Even between other religions like how the British divided and conquered the Indians by dividing Hindus and Muslims who had coexisted for so long. Sheitan is not any one nation or region, but sheitan al rajeem can fill the hearts of those in power to do horrible things in the search for more power. Makes me think of the Bagh massacre in Amritsar.. May Allah make all of the believers strong and united from all religions and especially unite the Muslim Ummah in these times of fitna. Ameen.
Suban Allah and Alhamdulillah......... May we overcome our 'perceived" differences and be worthy of the intercession of our beloved Prophet (PBUH) on the day of Judgement....
Imam Al Ghazali spoke on the matter of music beautifully. He says if music brings one in the direction truth it is a positive and accepted force. For myself, the background music increases my focus on the words spoken. Almost like guide rails for my thoughts.
@Imran Khan _I am so glad you said that because in Islam there is no music. Our prophet did not have music playing in the beginning middle end or in the background of his teaching so stop these kind of nonsense. May Allah SWT guide us all to success. Ameen_
@@fareedakhtar3059 the prophet Muhammed SAW also didn’t use a phone, he SAW didn’t use lichts, also didn’t use a car. Does this mean we should trow our phones away, ride camals/horses and use candles?
The Prophet ﷺ is reported to have said, ‘Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!’ [Musnad Ahmad, Al Hakim, al Jami’ al Saghir] Like many portents described to us by the Prophet ﷺ, it is not possible to conclusively identify one historical event as being the fulfilment of the promise. The above tradition regarding the conquest of Constantinople could apply to its conquest at the hands of Mehmed the Conqueror in 1453, or it could be referring to the conquest of Constantinople that will occur during Armageddon. Further hadiths concerning the conquest of Constantinople in the last days certainly seem to be support the opinion that the above hadith we mentioned refers to this future conquest at the time of the Mehdi and Sayyidna ‘Isa (peace be upon him), rather than the 1453 conquest. The ‘Fall’ of Constantinople in 1453 In May 1453, the Ottomans, led by Mehmed II, defeated the Byzantine Empire and took control of Constantinople, the capital of the Empire. They renamed the city Istanbul. Mehmed was 21 years old at the time, and Istanbul has remained in Muslim hands ever since. European Historians refer to this conquest as the ‘Fall of Constantinople’. The Conquest of Constantinople at the time of the Mahdi There are many hadiths which mention the details of the last days, the great battles that will take place, and the conquest of Constantinple. In a rigorously authenticated hadith, we find details of these events, in which the Prophet ﷺ described the Muslim army in those days, ‘They [the Muslims] will then fight and a third of the army would run away, whom Allah will never forgive. A third which would be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah’s eye, would be killed, and the third who would never be put to trial would win and they would be conquerors of Constantinople’ [Sahih Muslim] The Prophet is also reported to have said, with various weak narrations, that ‘The great Malhamah, the conquest of Constantinople, and the coming of the Dajjal occur in (the span of) seven months.’ [al Tirmidhi, abu Dawud] It is stated that at the end of times, the Mahdi will lead a huge army to face the Dajjal and his followers. This momentous battle is known as al Malhama al Kubra, the Great Slaughter. After fierce combat, and at the point when the Mahdi will find himself encircled by the enemy, The Prophet `Isa will descend, lead the Muslim armies, and slay the Dajjal. Soon after this, the Muslims will take Constantinople by peaceful means. ‘They will conquer Constantinople with Tasbih and Takbir and will acquire such spoils of war as has never been seen before.’ [Ibn Majah] In conclusion, it is not possible to categorically say which event the Prophet ﷺ was referring to in the initial hadith we mentioned. As such, it is safer to refrain from holding a fixed opinion on the matter, and not affirm or reject any of them decidedly. However, it is valid to incline towards one interpretation over another. Certainly, the various reports concerning the conquest of Constantinople during the last days at the hand of the Mahdi and Sayidna ‘Isa, renders this interpretation very viable. And Allah knows best. [Shaykh] Jamir Meah
According to most Islamic scholars, the praised ruler, conqueror of Istanbul is Imam Mahdi and the praised army is His army. They will conquer Istanbul without fighting and shedding blood, uttering the words of takbir and tesbih. This conquest will take place as part of the great battle of Melhama or Armageddon and the appearance of Deyal, which according to the hadiths of the Prophet will take place over a period of 7 months (Armageddon, the conquest of Istanbul and the appearance of Deyal).
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Ḥamūd at-Tuwayjrī رحمه الله said in his Itḥāf al-Jamāʿah (1/403-404): وقد فتحت القسطنطينية في سنة سبع وخمسين وثمانمائة على يد السلطان العثماني التركماني محمد الفاتح (وسمي الفاتح لفتحه القسطنطينية) ، ولم تزل القسطنطينية في أيدي العثمانيين إلى زماننا هذا في آخر القرن الرابع عشر من الهجرة، وهذا الفتح ليس هو المذكور في الأحاديث التي تقدم ذكرها؛ لأن ذاك إنما يكون بعد الملحمة الكبرى، وقبل خروج الدجال بزمن يسير؛ كما تقدم بيان ذلك في عدة أحاديث من أحاديث هذا الباب، وكما سيأتي أيضا في حديثي معاذ وعبد الله بن بشر رضي الله عنهما، ويكون فتحها بالتسبيح والتهليل والتكبير لا بكثرة العدد والعدة؛ كما تقدم مصرحا به في غير ما حديث من أحاديث هذا الباب، ويكون فتحها على أيدي العرب لا أيدي التركمان؛ كما يدل على ذلك قوله في حديث عمرو بن عوف رضي الله عنه: «ثم يخرج إليهم روقة المسلمين أهل الحجاز، الذين لا تأخذهم في الله لومة لائم، حتى يفتح الله عليهم قسطنطينية ورومية بالتسبيح والتكبير» . وفي حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه عند مسلم: «فيخرج إليهم جيش من المدينة من خيار أهل الأرض يومئذ» . وفي حديث عبد الله بن عمرو رضي الله عنهما: «ويستمد المسلمون بعضهم بعضًا حتى يمدهم أهل عدن أبين» . وفي حديث ذي مخمر رضي الله عنه: «أن الروم يقولون لصاحبهم: كفيناك حد العرب، ثم يغدرون ويجتمعون للملحمة» . فدل هذا على أن الملحمة الكبرى تكون بين العرب والروم، والذين يباشرون القتال في الملحمة الكبرى هم الذين يفتحون القسطنطينية، وأمير الجيش الذي يفتحها في آخر الزمان عند خروج الدجال هو الممدوح هو وجيشه؛ كما تقدم ذلك في حديث عبد الله بن بشر الخثعمي عن أبيه رضي الله عنه، وتقدم في حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه الذي رواه الخطيب في المتفق والمفترق: «أن أمير الجيش إذ ذاك من عترة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم.» والمقصود هاهنا التنبيه على أن الفتح المنوه بذكره في أحاديث هذا الباب لم يقع إلى الآن، وسيقع في آخر الزمان عند خروج الدجال، ومن حمل ذلك على ما وقع في سنة سبع وخمسين وثمانمائة؛ فقد أخطأ وتكلف ما لا علم له به. والله أعلم. Constantinople was conquered in 857 AH at the hands of the Ottoman Turkman Sulṭān Muḥammad al-Fātiḥ (he was called al-Fātiḥ because he was the one who conquered Constantinople), and Constantinople is still in the hands of the Ottomans in our time at the end of the fourteenth century AH. This conquest is not the one that was mentioned in the aḥādīth that have been mentioned above because that [conquest] can only take place after the great battle and shortly before the emergence of the Dajjāl, as already discussed in several aḥādīth in this chapter, as will be mentioned in the ḥadīth by Muʿādh and ʿAbdullāh bin Bishr - may Allāh be pleased with them. The conquest of Constantinople will be with tasbīḥ, tahlīl, and takbīr and not with great numbers or having many weapons, as explicitly stated in many narrations in this chapter. Constantinople will be conquered at the hands of the Arabs and not at the hands of the Turks. This is indictated by the his saying [ﷺ] narrated by ʿAmr bin ʿAwf - may Allāh be pleased with him: “...then the strong youth of the Muslims of the people of al-Ḥijāz, who do not fear the blame of a critic in the cause of Allāh, will come out to them, until Allāh makes them conquer Constantinople and Rome with tasbīḥ and takbīr.” Also, the ḥadīth by Abū Hurayrah - may Allāh be pleased with him in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim: “...then an army from al-Madīnah will come out to them who will be the best of the people of the entire earth at that time.” And in the ḥadīth of ʿAbdullāh bin ʿUmar: “The Muslims will help each other until the people of ʿAdan Abiyan will provide them with help.” Also, the ḥadīth narrated by Makhmar - may Allāh be pleased with him: “The Romans will say to their leader: We will suffice you from the Arabs, then they will betray [their covenant with the Arabs], and they will gather for the battle.” This proves that the great battle will take place between the Arabs and the Romans and it is those who will fight in this great battle that will conquer Constantinople. The commander of the army who will conquer it at the end of time when the Dajjāl will emerge is the one who is praised along with his army, as already mentioned in the ḥadīth narrated by ʿAbdullāh bin Bishr Al-Khathʿamī from his father. The ḥadīth narrated by Abū Hurayrah - may Allāh be pleased with him - mentioned earlier, which was reported by al-Khaṭīb in «al-Muttafiq wal-Muftariq» says: “The commander of the army at that time shall be from the household of the Prophet ﷺ.” What should be mentioned here is that the conquest mentioned in the aḥādīth in this chapter has not yet happened, and it will take place at the end of time, when the Dajjāl will emerge. The scholars who interpreted it to mean what happened in the year 857 AH have erred and said what they had no knowledge of. -End quote Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Aḥmad ibn Shākir رحمه الله said in his ʿUmdat at-Tafsīr ʿan al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr (2/245): فتح القسطنطينية المبشر به في الحديث سيكون في مستقبل قريب أو بعيد يعلمه الله عز وجل، وهو الفتح الصحيح لها حين يعود المسلمون إلى دينهم الذي أعرضوا عنه، وأما فتح الترك الذي كان قبل عصرنا هذا فإنه كان تمهيدا للفتح الأعظم، ثم هي قد خرجت بعد ذلك من أيدي المسلمين منذ أعلنت حكومتهم هناك أنها حكومة غير إسلامية وغير دينية وعاهدت الكفار أعداء الإسلام, وحكمت أمتها بأحكام القوانين الوثنية الكافرة، وسيعود الفتح الإسلامي لها إن شاء الله كما بشر به رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم. The conquering of Constantinople which was foretold in the ḥadīth will be in the near or far away future, and Allāh knows best. That will be the true conquest, when the Muslims return to their religion that they have abandoned. As for the conquest of the Turks, which transpired before our time, then that was just a sort of facilitation, or preparation for the great conquest yet to come. Because afterwards Constantinople was once again taken away from the hands of the Muslims, and the government at that time announced that it is not an Islamic or religious government. Thereafter it made a pact with the enemies of al-Islām, and it ruled its people with hedonistic and disbelieving laws. The Islamic conquest of Constantinople will transpire, if Allāh wills, as foretold by the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ. -End quote
Exactly,brother! May Allah reward you for the Clarification. This is one of the most misunderstood and misquoted Hadeeth indeed. And it is often used by Hanafi Soofees and Maturidis ( just like this video shows ) to prove that they are the ones who are on the straight path and that they are being praised and foretold by the Prophet. Astagfirullah!
agree that the way Quran is receited is exactly what have been conserved, often people think Quran is the book no, actually Quran mean recitation, so the recitation is what is mahfod, or conserved and protected from change, because often you find similar words or words that are spelled differently and it change the meaning, but how you spell something is a more accurate way to convey meaning about the schools/madahib being chosen doen't mean that they are the best madahib, the sons of israel were chosen but were they the best? same for muslims, being chosen means there is a reason for God to chose people, but don't mean they are the best maybe they were chosen because they had all the worst attributes of humanity, like how banu isreal were mentionned in Quran, that even after reveletation, they still distorted the words of God, out of vanity and pride and the same could be said about muslims, i think lot of muslims had a distorted perception about their status in front of God
With all due respect, bārakaAllāhu fīkum: The Hadith has a serious defect, being narrated by someone by the supposed name of 'Abdullāh ibn Bishr Al-Khath'amī and he is unknown, none have labelled him trustworthy except Ibn Ḥibbān, and he was known to do so with unknown narrators, whichis why his grading in that matter is not unequivocally accepted. Also, Ibn Ḥajr mentions that there is "idhtirāb" (when there's a reversal in a name or names in a chain or text, or clear confusion regarding it) in the name of this narrator. There's difference of opinion in his name, his father's name, and in his tribal attribution. It is mentioned that his name is 'Abdullāh, or 'Ubaydullāh, or simply 'Ubayd. It is mentioned his father's name was Bashīr or Bishr. And it is mentioned he was Al-Khath'amī or some mention he was Al-Ghanawī. And Allāh Knows best. [ See: Ta'jīl Al-Manfa'ah 1/721] So, the narrator is weak and the only one who declares him otherwise has been criticized in general regarding his rulings of declaring narrators trustworthy or not. And, for the sake of argument, we assumed the Hadith was authentic, then with what criteria are we arriving to the conclusion and understanding that he has?
@@AbooLayth Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) is reported to have said: “Soon Constantinople will be defeated, how wonderful will be the leader and the army (that conquers Constantinople).” (Mustadrak Hakim, vol. 4 pg. 422 and Musnad Ahmad, vol. 4 pg. 335) Imam Hakim (rahimahullah) has declared the Hadith authentic and Hafiz Dhahabi (rahimahullah) concurs. Also see Majma’uz Zawaid, vol. 6 pg 218 And Allah Ta’ala Knows best Answered by: Moulana Suhail Motala Approved by: Moulana Muhammad Abasoomar Checked by: Moulana Haroon Abasoomar
@@mikhan5191 JazākaAllāhu khayran, may Allāh bless and preserve you, āmīn. Al-Ḥāfiẓ Adh-Dhahabī remaining quiet on a specific narration isn't him agreeing with Imām Al-Ḥākim, as Adh-Dhahabī simply was abridging "Al-Mustadrak" not commenting on every Ḥadīth. In totality, Adh-Dhahabī made very little commentary. However, if you read "Siyar 'Alām An-Nubalā" in Adh-Dhahabī's biography of Imām Al-Ḥākim then you will see his detailed criticism of the majority of the narrations in it, he approximates about ⅓ of the book has narrations that are acceptable. The rest of the chains are problematic and riddled with hidden defects (علل خفية - 'ilal khafiyyah). To add to that, Al-Ḥāfiẓ Adh-Dhahabī himself in his book "Al-Mīzān" heavily criticises and weakens the very narrator in question who this narration is related by, AND the one relating it from him, as well, walhamdulillāh. Also, the narration you quoted from the question you posed to the Mufti, it's chains revolve around the exact narrator that was shown to be unreliable, so that has not been addressed at all, bārakaAllāhu fīkum. Also, as mentioned by the Scholars of Ḥadīth, even if we accepted this narration, then it is understood in the light of all the other narrations that indicate it's meaning. And those narrations mentioned a conquering near the appearance of Dajjāl, near the end of times, not in the 800's AH. So, the narration isn't accepted by the Scholars of that Science; it is heavily criticised and weakened. Furthermore, if it is to be understood, then it is not to be understood to be referring to any specific time when Constantinople will be conquered, so to specify it to a specific Sultān or another requires proof. Lastly, the narrations thst are authentic indicate a conquering that takes place near the end of times just before the emergence of Dajjāl. I hope and pray this clarifies the issue, bārakaAllāhu fīkum wa jazākumAllāhu khayran.
@@AbooLayth you seem very knowledgeable may Allah reward you and increase your knowledge even more and raise your status ameen. I visited your channel. And I'm going to subscribe because it is full of wonderful and beautiful and educational videos ma sha Allah
Great video, the hadith that Hamza Yusuf refers to about Muhammad Fatih...there's alot of opinions on this and some scholars/ulama say that this hadith isn't referring to Muhammad Fatih. Can anyone shed some light?
What are the different opinions? I'm curious as to how they explain it, because Muhammad al-Fatih was the only Muslim ruler who opened Constantinople. From a historical perspective, it can only be him.
The prophet peace be up on him praised the Amir who will conquer constantinople after the great war (Malhama), which has not yet taken place. The holy Quran says, if the enemy wants peace, you should enter into a peace agreement with that enemy. How could the Amir put away the Quran and insist on conquering constantinople, while the other side did not want to fight?
First, many Islamic scholars say that Sultan Fatih is not the ruler mentioned by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in this tradition, nor is the Ottoman army the one he praised. There is much evidence for this view. The first and most important proof is the way in which, according to the hadiths, that army will conquer Istanbul. Namely, this army will conquer Istanbul by just saying La illahe il Allah without any battle and bloodshed . Another hadith says that a third of the army that will attack Istanbul will flee the battlefield, a third will die and become the best martyrs and a third will survive and that third of the army will enter Istanbul. This hadith is exclusively related to Armageddon and the battles to be fought by Imam Mahdi. And the third hadith of the Prophet in which He says that Armageddon, the conquest of Istanbul and the arrival of Dejal will take place in a time span of 7 months. All these hadiths together point to the conclusion that the praised ruler is Imam Mahdi and that the praised army is in fact his army. And this makes sense given the many hadiths that speak of the values of Imam Mahdi and the values of the Muslims who will follow him. One hadith says that the martyrs of that army will enter paradise without reckoning, etc. And for me personally, it would be very strange for the Prophet to explicitly praise someone who is a blind follower of any mesheb, Aqeedah and Sufi tariqat. Nakshibendi and Maturidi have never been mainstream members of Sunni Islam. Imam Mahdi will certainly not be a member of a madhhab, an specific Aqeedah direction or a Sufi tariqat. On the contrary, I am convinced that the Mahdi will simply call himself a Muslim, without any emphasis on belonging to any of the specific Islamic law schools or any sect.
Woah ..look a blind hater of madahib...good job....the sahabas who attacked Constantinople too wanted to be the subject of the glad tidings mentioned in the hadith...if they had thought that it would be the job of imam mahdi then they wouldn't have gone that far to conquer it...they understood hadith better than us...
@@abdulsudaisy You are giving fatwa by writing "wrong". Do you know that Muhammad (SAW) had 100000+ sahabas (companions) but only upto 30 of them gave fatwa, at that time others did not do so by their own will. Do you put yourself above those sahabas? Who was Muhammad (SAW) talking about then? Do you know? Any source? Do you claim yourself to be one of the well-known Ulama? Do your acquaintances concider you as Ulama, so you can make claim which thing is right and which is wrong? Clarify your thoughts before writing.
Why not talking about the true message of Allah through the Quran? The so-called 4 imams were no more than stooges of their kings, that's why their fiqhs are still alive ! Abu Hanifa performed tawbah two times, nobody talks about it ! Nobody talks about Imam Ja'far Al Sadiq IMAM UL FUQAHA عليه الصلاة و السلام, why ??? Because Imam is from Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام and the kings martyred all the Imams of Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام. Allah has compelled the Muslims to follow Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام, not companions or ta'bein etc... It should be noted that Imam Ja'far Al Sadiq عليه الصلاة و السلام called the sufis enemies of Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام and He was an ALL ROUNDER in all sciences !!! A sample of his students is Jabir bin Hayan (Geber), known in the west as the father of chemistry !
Truks cut off The Euphrat river or Tigris which goes through Iraq back in time which started through Turkey, it became shallow and Fish died for some reason I don't remember. And there was Turkey NATO ISIS offences toward Iraq which The Whole World fights a Proxy War in (inside Iraq). Justice is Belief, if through Imam Ali in Iraq. He is buried there. ... Mom said specifically Turkey wants The World to burn (together with USA) I'll start this video agan.
@@kadirqyq303 You are evil. ... I fear you to an extent, but i fear God more. True, I haven't prayed today, because I stood on Guard for someone yesterday whom can not respect themselves. Link of Log under this post.
Always love listening to this great scholar. Hamza Yusuf is a gem in our Ummah.
Here are some sunnah of the prophet(SAW)
#...When ever the prophet is mentioned say (sallallahu alaihi wasallam)
#...Dikir after every prayer/you can also add (wa bihamdi) and reciting *Alatul Kursi after every fard salah
*SubahanAllah 33 times
*AllahuAkbar 34 times
*Amhamdulillah 33time
#...While entering home syaing this supplication (Allahumma inni as'aluka khairal mawliji wa khairul makhraji bismillahi wajlana wa bismillahi kjarajna waaalla rabbina tawakkalna)
#... While going outside of home saying this supplication (Bismillah tawakkaltu aaalallah wala hawla wala quwwata illa billah)
#...When entering your home give salam even if there is no one give salam to your self
#...Entering the bathroom with left foot and exiting with right
*and covering the head and while relieving yourself sitting is wajib
*and when relieving yourself don't face the qibla or your back behind it
#...Entering the masjid with right foot and exiting with left and performing wudu at home
#...Every muslim you cross by give salam
#...Using meswak
#...Using fragrence
#...Reading Surah Khaf every Friday
#...Dusting the bed with an edge of an cloth or bromm
#...Eat with your right hand and share your food with the nearest person
#... if any food drops of the plate pick it up remove the dust and eat it
*after finish eating lick the plate with your fingers and lick your fingers
#...Before eating and drinking saying bismillah and after finishing eating and drinking saying Allhamdulillah
*if one forgots to say bismillah before eating or drinking say this (bismillahi fi awwalihi wa akhirihi)
#... After finish eating sya this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil ladhi at amani hadha wa razaqanihi min ghayri hawlin minnee wa la quwwatin)
#...Before staring any work or going to do something saying bismillah
#...After doing wudu saying (La illah illallah wadahu la sarikala)
#...While drinking or eating sitting is recommended and it is an sunnah
#...Sleeping on the right shoulder
#...Not sleeping on your stomach or chest
#...Before going to sleep
*sleep in the state of wudu
*Surah ikhlas 3 times
*Surah Nas 3 times
*Surah Falak 3 times
*Ayatul Kursi 3 times
*And saying (Lailahaillallah MuhammadaRrasulullah)
*And reciting Surah Mulk
#...When going to sleep saying this supplication
(Bismika rabbi wada tu janbi wa bika arfahu in amskata nafsi
fagfir laha wa in arsaltaha fahfazha bima tahfaz bihi ibadaka-s-salihin)or
(Allahuma bismika amutoo wa ahyaa)
#...After waking up saying this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil-lathee ahyana baaada ma amatana wa ilayhin nushoor)
#...After waking up doing wudu and put water inside the nose and blow it
#... when wering cloths syaing this supplication (Allhamdulillah hil lathee kasanee hatha aththawab warazaqaneehi min ghayri hawlin minnee wala quwwah)
*While wearing entire the right hand first and when taking of start with left hand same with the shoes
Reference
Sahih Al Bukhari: 12.28.153.168.183.216.217.245.568.3295.5010.5623.5628.5630.5631.
6293.6294.6295.6296.6311.6314.
6322.7393.7394
Sahih Muslim:
265.267(c).304.2018(a).2020.2024.
2025.2032.2034.2626
Jami Al Tirmidi:
14.1857.1858.1885.2048.2678.2689.
3426.3458
Abu Dawood:
2.30.51.4023.4141.5094.5095.5096. 5212
Ibn Majah:
303.307.3287.3288
An nasai:
259.
Credits goes to
Ismalic knowledge official
Ranga nature English
May Allah guide us and have patience and remember Your lord is not ONE EYED and to read surah kahf every friday
Plz pray for palistine,Jordan,Syria,Iraq, Iran,Somalia,Yemen,India,China, Bangladesh And for this ummah
Lailahaillallah MuhammadaRrasulullah
May Allah accept Hamza Yusuf (R) ❤️❤️❤️
Ameen
Ameen
He is still alive Alhamdulillah. Pl use دامت برکاتہم العالیہ for the living ones
OH IS HE NOT ALIVE?
Subhanallah! They didn't let them come in and divide and conquer, important.
Jazakallahu hoyron sheikh Hamza Yusuf and to the author of the channel who is posting it. I'm from Uzbekistan and our aqida is based on teachings of Imam Maturidiy and Imam Naqshbandiy.
We need scholars like him.
SUBHANALLAH!
I LOVE ALLAH
I LOVE THE MESSENGER
AND I LOVE SHAYKH HAMZA!
MAY ALLAH INCREASE IN ALL OF OURS IMAAN ISLAM AND IHSAAN
So that is your Trinity! God+prophet+your Sheikh! Subhan Allah. They will never call God Alone.
@@Call_God_Alone what the bloody hell is wrong with you
You hit your head somewhere?
@@lordtaseen2947 Nothing is wrong with me. But the amount of idol worshiping here is appalling.
Call God ALONE and Worship God Alone.
@@Call_God_Alone shut up.
You don't have a clue
@@lordtaseen2947 You have the free will to worship and love anyone besides your Creator! I just pointed out the stupidity and the blindness of mankind! They think the Prophet or any dead Saint will intercede on their behalf. You don't have to loose your temper, but please, continue loving and praising others besides Allah. You will reap your rewards very soon. Good luck
People in this gathering are the chosen ones. I live very far from them but my heart and thoughts are with them and people like them. Wallah
Someone pls share this with Ustad Hamza Yusuf,
"Once I had a dream where two waliyy sitting in a place in two big chairs like they are so honoured ones, then someone said Hamza Yusuf is coming and they immediately stood up out of respect for him" this dream is definitely a Bishara for Ustad Hamza Yusuf طول الله عمره و نفعنا بعلومه في الدارين..
I'm from India.
How do u know you saw two auliyaa. Shaytaam is also sending you dreams.
The division and conquest is clear when we see how the west divided Sunnis and Shias, Sufis and Wahhabis. Even between other religions like how the British divided and conquered the Indians by dividing Hindus and Muslims who had coexisted for so long.
Sheitan is not any one nation or region, but sheitan al rajeem can fill the hearts of those in power to do horrible things in the search for more power. Makes me think of the Bagh massacre in Amritsar..
May Allah make all of the believers strong and united from all religions and especially unite the Muslim Ummah in these times of fitna. Ameen.
Suban Allah and Alhamdulillah......... May we overcome our 'perceived" differences and be worthy of the intercession of our beloved Prophet (PBUH) on the day of Judgement....
A great scholar
Masha Allah
May God almighty bless him always
Subhan Allah
You don't need the background music. Its interfering with the message. Its a distraction! Thanks.
Honestly your comment was more a distraction unfortunately.. Thats a problem with the Ummah today.
Nitpicking on things they dont understand
Imam Al Ghazali spoke on the matter of music beautifully. He says if music brings one in the direction truth it is a positive and accepted force. For myself, the background music increases my focus on the words spoken. Almost like guide rails for my thoughts.
@Imran Khan _I am so glad you said that because in Islam there is no music. Our prophet did not have music playing in the beginning middle end or in the background of his teaching so stop these kind of nonsense. May Allah SWT guide us all to success. Ameen_
AGREED 👍
@@fareedakhtar3059 the prophet Muhammed SAW also didn’t use a phone, he SAW didn’t use lichts, also didn’t use a car. Does this mean we should trow our phones away, ride camals/horses and use candles?
Ummati of Dawat Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
The Prophet ﷺ is reported to have said, ‘Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!’ [Musnad Ahmad, Al Hakim, al Jami’ al Saghir]
Like many portents described to us by the Prophet ﷺ, it is not possible to conclusively identify one historical event as being the fulfilment of the promise. The above tradition regarding the conquest of Constantinople could apply to its conquest at the hands of Mehmed the Conqueror in 1453, or it could be referring to the conquest of Constantinople that will occur during Armageddon.
Further hadiths concerning the conquest of Constantinople in the last days certainly seem to be support the opinion that the above hadith we mentioned refers to this future conquest at the time of the Mehdi and Sayyidna ‘Isa (peace be upon him), rather than the 1453 conquest.
The ‘Fall’ of Constantinople in 1453
In May 1453, the Ottomans, led by Mehmed II, defeated the Byzantine Empire and took control of Constantinople, the capital of the Empire. They renamed the city Istanbul. Mehmed was 21 years old at the time, and Istanbul has remained in Muslim hands ever since. European Historians refer to this conquest as the ‘Fall of Constantinople’.
The Conquest of Constantinople at the time of the Mahdi
There are many hadiths which mention the details of the last days, the great battles that will take place, and the conquest of Constantinple.
In a rigorously authenticated hadith, we find details of these events, in which the Prophet ﷺ described the Muslim army in those days, ‘They [the Muslims] will then fight and a third of the army would run away, whom Allah will never forgive. A third which would be constituted of excellent martyrs in Allah’s eye, would be killed, and the third who would never be put to trial would win and they would be conquerors of Constantinople’ [Sahih Muslim]
The Prophet is also reported to have said, with various weak narrations, that ‘The great Malhamah, the conquest of Constantinople, and the coming of the Dajjal occur in (the span of) seven months.’ [al Tirmidhi, abu Dawud]
It is stated that at the end of times, the Mahdi will lead a huge army to face the Dajjal and his followers. This momentous battle is known as al Malhama al Kubra, the Great Slaughter. After fierce combat, and at the point when the Mahdi will find himself encircled by the enemy, The Prophet `Isa will descend, lead the Muslim armies, and slay the Dajjal. Soon after this, the Muslims will take Constantinople by peaceful means. ‘They will conquer Constantinople with Tasbih and Takbir and will acquire such spoils of war as has never been seen before.’ [Ibn Majah]
In conclusion, it is not possible to categorically say which event the Prophet ﷺ was referring to in the initial hadith we mentioned. As such, it is safer to refrain from holding a fixed opinion on the matter, and not affirm or reject any of them decidedly.
However, it is valid to incline towards one interpretation over another. Certainly, the various reports concerning the conquest of Constantinople during the last days at the hand of the Mahdi and Sayidna ‘Isa, renders this interpretation very viable. And Allah knows best.
[Shaykh] Jamir Meah
According to most Islamic scholars, the praised ruler, conqueror of Istanbul is Imam Mahdi and the praised army is His army. They will conquer Istanbul without fighting and shedding blood, uttering the words of takbir and tesbih. This conquest will take place as part of the great battle of Melhama or Armageddon and the appearance of Deyal, which according to the hadiths of the Prophet will take place over a period of 7 months (Armageddon, the conquest of Istanbul and the appearance of Deyal).
Salahuddin Ayyubi was a shafi’i in fiqh and a ashari in aqeedah.
Plz Share and Subscribe | Jazakallahu Khair and May Allah bless you and your family, Ameen
اللهم صل وسلم على سيدنا ومولانا محمد عبدك ورسولك النبي الأمي وعلى آله وصحبه وسلم
Allahuakbar
The majority in indonesia afaik sunni ashari, syafii, and junaid al baghdadi+al ghazali
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Ḥamūd at-Tuwayjrī رحمه الله said in his Itḥāf al-Jamāʿah (1/403-404):
وقد فتحت القسطنطينية في سنة سبع وخمسين وثمانمائة على يد السلطان العثماني التركماني محمد الفاتح (وسمي الفاتح لفتحه القسطنطينية) ، ولم تزل القسطنطينية في أيدي العثمانيين إلى زماننا هذا في آخر القرن الرابع عشر من الهجرة، وهذا الفتح ليس هو المذكور في الأحاديث التي تقدم ذكرها؛ لأن ذاك إنما يكون بعد الملحمة الكبرى، وقبل خروج الدجال بزمن يسير؛ كما تقدم بيان ذلك في عدة أحاديث من أحاديث هذا الباب، وكما سيأتي أيضا في حديثي معاذ وعبد الله بن بشر رضي الله عنهما، ويكون فتحها بالتسبيح والتهليل والتكبير لا بكثرة العدد والعدة؛ كما تقدم مصرحا به في غير ما حديث من أحاديث هذا الباب، ويكون فتحها على أيدي العرب لا أيدي التركمان؛ كما يدل على ذلك قوله في حديث عمرو بن عوف رضي الله عنه: «ثم يخرج إليهم روقة المسلمين أهل الحجاز، الذين لا تأخذهم في الله لومة لائم، حتى يفتح الله عليهم قسطنطينية ورومية بالتسبيح والتكبير» . وفي حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه عند مسلم: «فيخرج إليهم جيش من المدينة من خيار أهل الأرض يومئذ» .
وفي حديث عبد الله بن عمرو رضي الله عنهما: «ويستمد المسلمون بعضهم بعضًا حتى يمدهم أهل عدن أبين» . وفي حديث ذي مخمر رضي الله عنه: «أن الروم يقولون لصاحبهم: كفيناك حد العرب، ثم يغدرون ويجتمعون للملحمة» . فدل هذا على أن الملحمة الكبرى تكون بين العرب والروم، والذين يباشرون القتال في الملحمة الكبرى هم الذين يفتحون القسطنطينية، وأمير الجيش الذي يفتحها في آخر الزمان عند خروج الدجال هو الممدوح هو وجيشه؛ كما تقدم ذلك في حديث عبد الله بن بشر الخثعمي عن أبيه رضي الله عنه، وتقدم في حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه الذي رواه الخطيب في المتفق والمفترق: «أن أمير الجيش إذ ذاك من عترة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم.» والمقصود هاهنا التنبيه على أن الفتح المنوه بذكره في أحاديث هذا الباب لم يقع إلى الآن، وسيقع في آخر الزمان عند خروج الدجال، ومن حمل ذلك على ما وقع في سنة سبع وخمسين وثمانمائة؛ فقد أخطأ وتكلف ما لا علم له به. والله أعلم.
Constantinople was conquered in 857 AH at the hands of the Ottoman Turkman Sulṭān Muḥammad al-Fātiḥ (he was called al-Fātiḥ because he was the one who conquered Constantinople), and Constantinople is still in the hands of the Ottomans in our time at the end of the fourteenth century AH. This conquest is not the one that was mentioned in the aḥādīth that have been mentioned above because that [conquest] can only take place after the great battle and shortly before the emergence of the Dajjāl, as already discussed in several aḥādīth in this chapter, as will be mentioned in the ḥadīth by Muʿādh and ʿAbdullāh bin Bishr - may Allāh be pleased with them. The conquest of Constantinople will be with tasbīḥ, tahlīl, and takbīr and not with great numbers or having many weapons, as explicitly stated in many narrations in this chapter. Constantinople will be conquered at the hands of the Arabs and not at the hands of the Turks. This is indictated by the his saying [ﷺ] narrated by ʿAmr bin ʿAwf - may Allāh be pleased with him: “...then the strong youth of the Muslims of the people of al-Ḥijāz, who do not fear the blame of a critic in the cause of Allāh, will come out to them, until Allāh makes them conquer Constantinople and Rome with tasbīḥ and takbīr.” Also, the ḥadīth by Abū Hurayrah - may Allāh be pleased with him in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim: “...then an army from al-Madīnah will come out to them who will be the best of the people of the entire earth at that time.”
And in the ḥadīth of ʿAbdullāh bin ʿUmar: “The Muslims will help each other until the people of ʿAdan Abiyan will provide them with help.” Also, the ḥadīth narrated by Makhmar - may Allāh be pleased with him: “The Romans will say to their leader: We will suffice you from the Arabs, then they will betray [their covenant with the Arabs], and they will gather for the battle.” This proves that the great battle will take place between the Arabs and the Romans and it is those who will fight in this great battle that will conquer Constantinople. The commander of the army who will conquer it at the end of time when the Dajjāl will emerge is the one who is praised along with his army, as already mentioned in the ḥadīth narrated by ʿAbdullāh bin Bishr Al-Khathʿamī from his father. The ḥadīth narrated by Abū Hurayrah - may Allāh be pleased with him - mentioned earlier, which was reported by al-Khaṭīb in «al-Muttafiq wal-Muftariq» says: “The commander of the army at that time shall be from the household of the Prophet ﷺ.” What should be mentioned here is that the conquest mentioned in the aḥādīth in this chapter has not yet happened, and it will take place at the end of time, when the Dajjāl will emerge. The scholars who interpreted it to mean what happened in the year 857 AH have erred and said what they had no knowledge of.
-End quote
Ash-Sheikh al-ʿAllāmah Aḥmad ibn Shākir رحمه الله said in his ʿUmdat at-Tafsīr ʿan al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr (2/245):
فتح القسطنطينية المبشر به في الحديث سيكون في مستقبل قريب أو بعيد يعلمه الله عز وجل، وهو الفتح الصحيح لها حين يعود المسلمون إلى دينهم الذي أعرضوا عنه، وأما فتح الترك الذي كان قبل عصرنا هذا فإنه كان تمهيدا للفتح الأعظم، ثم هي قد خرجت بعد ذلك من أيدي المسلمين منذ أعلنت حكومتهم هناك أنها حكومة غير إسلامية وغير دينية وعاهدت الكفار أعداء الإسلام, وحكمت أمتها بأحكام القوانين الوثنية الكافرة، وسيعود الفتح الإسلامي لها إن شاء الله كما بشر به رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم.
The conquering of Constantinople which was foretold in the ḥadīth will be in the near or far away future, and Allāh knows best. That will be the true conquest, when the Muslims return to their religion that they have abandoned. As for the conquest of the Turks, which transpired before our time, then that was just a sort of facilitation, or preparation for the great conquest yet to come. Because afterwards Constantinople was once again taken away from the hands of the Muslims, and the government at that time announced that it is not an Islamic or religious government. Thereafter it made a pact with the enemies of al-Islām, and it ruled its people with hedonistic and disbelieving laws. The Islamic conquest of Constantinople will transpire, if Allāh wills, as foretold by the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ.
-End quote
Exactly,brother! May Allah reward you for the Clarification. This is one of the most misunderstood and misquoted Hadeeth indeed. And it is often used by Hanafi Soofees and Maturidis ( just like this video shows ) to prove that they are the ones who are on the straight path and that they are being praised and foretold by the Prophet. Astagfirullah!
I follow the Somali madhab
Hazrat zakryia khandelwi r.a and other deobandi and hazrat imam shamil r.a burried in jannatul baqi. And Sufi graves in madina sharief
agree that the way Quran is receited is exactly what have been conserved, often people think Quran is the book
no, actually Quran mean recitation, so the recitation is what is mahfod, or conserved and protected from change, because often you find similar words or words that are spelled differently and it change the meaning, but how you spell something is a more accurate way to convey meaning
about the schools/madahib being chosen doen't mean that they are the best madahib, the sons of israel were chosen but were they the best?
same for muslims, being chosen means there is a reason for God to chose people, but don't mean they are the best
maybe they were chosen because they had all the worst attributes of humanity, like how banu isreal were mentionned in Quran, that even after reveletation, they still distorted the words of God, out of vanity and pride
and the same could be said about muslims, i think lot of muslims had a distorted perception about their status in front of God
With all due respect, bārakaAllāhu fīkum:
The Hadith has a serious defect, being narrated by someone by the supposed name of 'Abdullāh ibn Bishr Al-Khath'amī and he is unknown, none have labelled him trustworthy except Ibn Ḥibbān, and he was known to do so with unknown narrators, whichis why his grading in that matter is not unequivocally accepted.
Also, Ibn Ḥajr mentions that there is "idhtirāb" (when there's a reversal in a name or names in a chain or text, or clear confusion regarding it) in the name of this narrator. There's difference of opinion in his name, his father's name, and in his tribal attribution.
It is mentioned that his name is 'Abdullāh, or 'Ubaydullāh, or simply 'Ubayd. It is mentioned his father's name was Bashīr or Bishr. And it is mentioned he was Al-Khath'amī or some mention he was Al-Ghanawī. And Allāh Knows best. [ See: Ta'jīl Al-Manfa'ah 1/721]
So, the narrator is weak and the only one who declares him otherwise has been criticized in general regarding his rulings of declaring narrators trustworthy or not.
And, for the sake of argument, we assumed the Hadith was authentic, then with what criteria are we arriving to the conclusion and understanding that he has?
Thank you for this info jazakallahu khayr
@@ahmedreads1794 you're welcome akhī, wa iyyākum.
@@AbooLayth
Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) is reported to have said:
“Soon Constantinople will be defeated, how wonderful will be the leader and the army (that conquers Constantinople).”
(Mustadrak Hakim, vol. 4 pg. 422 and Musnad Ahmad, vol. 4 pg. 335)
Imam Hakim (rahimahullah) has declared the Hadith authentic and Hafiz Dhahabi (rahimahullah) concurs. Also see Majma’uz Zawaid, vol. 6 pg 218
And Allah Ta’ala Knows best
Answered by: Moulana Suhail Motala
Approved by: Moulana Muhammad Abasoomar
Checked by: Moulana Haroon Abasoomar
@@mikhan5191 JazākaAllāhu khayran, may Allāh bless and preserve you, āmīn.
Al-Ḥāfiẓ Adh-Dhahabī remaining quiet on a specific narration isn't him agreeing with Imām Al-Ḥākim, as Adh-Dhahabī simply was abridging "Al-Mustadrak" not commenting on every Ḥadīth. In totality, Adh-Dhahabī made very little commentary. However, if you read "Siyar 'Alām An-Nubalā" in Adh-Dhahabī's biography of Imām Al-Ḥākim then you will see his detailed criticism of the majority of the narrations in it, he approximates about ⅓ of the book has narrations that are acceptable. The rest of the chains are problematic and riddled with hidden defects (علل خفية - 'ilal khafiyyah).
To add to that, Al-Ḥāfiẓ Adh-Dhahabī himself in his book "Al-Mīzān" heavily criticises and weakens the very narrator in question who this narration is related by, AND the one relating it from him, as well, walhamdulillāh.
Also, the narration you quoted from the question you posed to the Mufti, it's chains revolve around the exact narrator that was shown to be unreliable, so that has not been addressed at all, bārakaAllāhu fīkum.
Also, as mentioned by the Scholars of Ḥadīth, even if we accepted this narration, then it is understood in the light of all the other narrations that indicate it's meaning. And those narrations mentioned a conquering near the appearance of Dajjāl, near the end of times, not in the 800's AH.
So, the narration isn't accepted by the Scholars of that Science; it is heavily criticised and weakened. Furthermore, if it is to be understood, then it is not to be understood to be referring to any specific time when Constantinople will be conquered, so to specify it to a specific Sultān or another requires proof. Lastly, the narrations thst are authentic indicate a conquering that takes place near the end of times just before the emergence of Dajjāl.
I hope and pray this clarifies the issue, bārakaAllāhu fīkum wa jazākumAllāhu khayran.
@@AbooLayth you seem very knowledgeable may Allah reward you and increase your knowledge even more and raise your status ameen. I visited your channel. And I'm going to subscribe because it is full of wonderful and beautiful and educational videos ma sha Allah
Great video, the hadith that Hamza Yusuf refers to about Muhammad Fatih...there's alot of opinions on this and some scholars/ulama say that this hadith isn't referring to Muhammad Fatih. Can anyone shed some light?
What are the different opinions? I'm curious as to how they explain it, because Muhammad al-Fatih was the only Muslim ruler who opened Constantinople. From a historical perspective, it can only be him.
Dont people say Auzubillah and Authubillah like the th and z are differently pronounced so now Im just confused...
The prophet peace be up on him praised the Amir who will conquer constantinople after the great war (Malhama), which has not yet taken place. The holy Quran says, if the enemy wants peace, you should enter into a peace agreement with that enemy. How could the Amir put away the Quran and insist on conquering constantinople, while the other side did not want to fight?
Is it true that the all four fuqahah were the gatherers or collectors of all the fuqaha?
Bro, can I ask you about your Jurisprudence?
I follow the hanafi fiqh
@@alhaqiquhOfficial ما شاء الله
I am too a Hanafi
3:09
no
can't I be just a Muslim?
without the other titles.
I mean in the days of the prophet pbuh there was not any of these groups.
If u r from oxford university, u cant claim urself to be from other school right?
First, many Islamic scholars say that Sultan Fatih is not the ruler mentioned by the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in this tradition, nor is the Ottoman army the one he praised. There is much evidence for this view. The first and most important proof is the way in which, according to the hadiths, that army will conquer Istanbul. Namely, this army will conquer Istanbul by just saying La illahe il Allah without any battle and bloodshed . Another hadith says that a third of the army that will attack Istanbul will flee the battlefield, a third will die and become the best martyrs and a third will survive and that third of the army will enter Istanbul. This hadith is exclusively related to Armageddon and the battles to be fought by Imam Mahdi. And the third hadith of the Prophet in which He says that Armageddon, the conquest of Istanbul and the arrival of Dejal will take place in a time span of 7 months. All these hadiths together point to the conclusion that the praised ruler is Imam Mahdi and that the praised army is in fact his army. And this makes sense given the many hadiths that speak of the values of Imam Mahdi and the values of the Muslims who will follow him. One hadith says that the martyrs of that army will enter paradise without reckoning, etc. And for me personally, it would be very strange for the Prophet to explicitly praise someone who is a blind follower of any mesheb, Aqeedah and Sufi tariqat. Nakshibendi and Maturidi have never been mainstream members of Sunni Islam. Imam Mahdi will certainly not be a member of a madhhab, an specific Aqeedah direction or a Sufi tariqat. On the contrary, I am convinced that the Mahdi will simply call himself a Muslim, without any emphasis on belonging to any of the specific Islamic law schools or any sect.
Woah ..look a blind hater of madahib...good job....the sahabas who attacked Constantinople too wanted to be the subject of the glad tidings mentioned in the hadith...if they had thought that it would be the job of imam mahdi then they wouldn't have gone that far to conquer it...they understood hadith better than us...
How are you sure Salahuddeen was the Amir the prophet was referring to. I don’t believe that to be Salahuddeen.
he was talking about mehmed bro
@@alhaqiquhOfficial which Mehmet?
@@abdulsudaisy mehmed al fateh
@@alhaqiquhOfficial wrong. He was not the Muhammad the prophet SAW was talking about.
@@abdulsudaisy
You are giving fatwa by writing "wrong". Do you know that Muhammad (SAW) had 100000+ sahabas (companions) but only upto 30 of them gave fatwa, at that time others did not do so by their own will. Do you put yourself above those sahabas?
Who was Muhammad (SAW) talking about then? Do you know? Any source? Do you claim yourself to be one of the well-known Ulama? Do your acquaintances concider you as Ulama, so you can make claim which thing is right and which is wrong?
Clarify your thoughts before writing.
Why not talking about the true message of Allah through the Quran? The so-called 4 imams were no more than stooges of their kings, that's why their fiqhs are still alive ! Abu Hanifa performed tawbah two times, nobody talks about it ! Nobody talks about Imam Ja'far Al Sadiq IMAM UL FUQAHA عليه الصلاة و السلام, why ??? Because Imam is from Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام and the kings martyred all the Imams of Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام. Allah has compelled the Muslims to follow Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام, not companions or ta'bein etc... It should be noted that Imam Ja'far Al Sadiq عليه الصلاة و السلام called the sufis enemies of Ehlul Bait عليهم الصلاة و السلام and He was an ALL ROUNDER in all sciences !!! A sample of his students is Jabir bin Hayan (Geber), known in the west as the father of chemistry !
Truks cut off The Euphrat river or Tigris which goes through Iraq back in time which started through Turkey, it became shallow and Fish died for some reason I don't remember. And there was Turkey NATO ISIS offences toward Iraq which The Whole World fights a Proxy War in (inside Iraq). Justice is Belief, if through Imam Ali in Iraq. He is buried there. ... Mom said specifically Turkey wants The World to burn (together with USA)
I'll start this video agan.
Is there a general/spesific difference between Jaa'fari and Shia Tradition I don't know?
Ibn Tamiyaa has said some scary Things against Shia ... it is unfair
@@kadirqyq303 You are evil. ... I fear you to an extent, but i fear God more. True, I haven't prayed today, because I stood on Guard for someone yesterday whom can not respect themselves. Link of Log under this post.
@@kadirqyq303 You should better learn how to talk to people online, whether or not you disagree with them. Fear Allah, at least in Ramadan!