Battlefield 2042 Is Another Disastrous Launch For EA, Faces Mass Protest From Community
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- SOURCES:
1: www.metacritic...
2: www.eurogamer....
3: www.ign.com/ar...
4: Ba...
5: Ba...
6: kotaku.com/bat...
7: www.pcgamer.co...
8: / reality_is_often_disap...
9: Ba...
10: www.pcgamer.co...
11: www.pcgamer.co...
12: www.gamespot.c...
13: / battlefield2042
14: / its_that_time_again_folks
15: / a_suggestion_for_a_bet...
16: / cursed_date
17: / sad_but_true
18: / next_level_destruction...
19: / next_generation_destru...
20: / fine_ill_do_it_myself
21: / i_made_a_redesign_for_...
22: / hey_guys_after_seeing_...
23: / pov_the_players_turn_i...
24: / can_we_please_get_rid_...
25: / this_is_just_baffling_...
26: / no_distance_bonus_poin...
27: / footsteps_audio_is_rea...
28: / not_having_a_way_to_te...
29: / please_for_the_love_of...
30: / why_is_competition_suc...
31: / removing_statistics_li...
32: / you_can_shoot_yourself...
33: / love_the_new_purgatory...
34: / if_you_see_weapons_lyi...
35: / i_actually_laughed
36: / dice_i_have_more_than_...
37: / well_this_is_terrifying
38: / ah_yes
39: / hovercrafts_are_op_2042
40: / is_muzzle_brake_actual...
41: / why_cant_i_land_my_shots
42: / wtf_how_can_it_be_this...
43: / this_random_spread_is_...
44: / random_bullet_deviatio...
45: / how_does_dice_expect_u...
46: / it_blows_my_mind_there...
47: / this_game_is_a_major_s...
48: / the_game_is_fun_but_co...
49: / this_is_literally_the_...
50: / how_does_this_happen_a...
"Don't worry guys, the beta is an older build." If you're having fun with this game, that's dope, but it's still worth pointing out issues that a game like this shouldn't launch with.
SURPRISE MECHANICS (MERCH): www.yongyea.com
PATREON: www.patreon.com/yongyea
TWITTER: twitter.com/yongyea
TOP PATRONS
[CIPHER]
- Joseph Lavoie
- Unit 526
[BIG BOSS]
- Charlie Galvin
- Devon B
- Jonathan Ball
- Sarano
- skyrimfan14
[BOSS]
- Gerardo Andrade
- Joe Hunt
- MD archenangel
- Michael Redmond
- Peter Vrba
- Shepard Gaming
- Time Dragonlord
[LEGENDARY]
- BattleBladeWar
- TacoBell Call911
- Theron Webb
.
.
.
Omg I love you
.
I'd like to thank all these AAA games for helping me save a lot of money this year
Ikr they're really doing us a solid
Western ones at least.
So far I’ve been impressed with their desire to see me save money….except steam….steam is always looking to get their fingers in my wallet lol gawddamn sales
I feel the same. Though Japanese and Chinese studios got my money. They still sell games, not minimal viable products.
I now hv more trust on indie devs. At least the good ones x need to lie to players in order to sell. Their games r really excellent too (eg: Subnautica, Long Dark, Undying) to name a few
I feel sorry for the kids that didn't grow up in the era of gaming where you could just go and buy a game and it would just work straight out the box, no day 1 updates, no micro transactions, no game-breaking bugs, no unpolished messes. Good times, good times.
Yeah I have a feeling that lots of people arent going to be buying new games soon and these developers will wonder why.
MW2? Halo Reach? Left 4 Dead????
Yup the PS1 and PS2 era was ace. The developers were passionate about their product. Games had to work day 1 as there was no internet to download a patch and save the developers arse.
Sweet, sweet 2142 in 2006.
Yep, the golden days before the internet, where they had to make a solid product because a) It couldn’t be “fixed” and b) Word of mouth, which was the original and authentic “hype train”. If your friends didn’t recommend it, it didn’t sell. Period. These days any old paid off UA-camr will tell you every garbage game is great.
The lesson is, as always, don’t buy before the post-release reviews.
Nah, don't buy a game unless there is evidence from the community that it isn't a trash fire. Elden ring is a great example, as the network test shows how good it actually will be.
Here at House Biscuit, we do not pre-order.
@@daleyhuard3675 or don't buy anything from Ea because it will be shit.
I preorder the base edition for the in game rewards,and if the game ends up being bad I just return it.
@@nicholastran4311 This is what "regret" means! EAids always help people to realize it through their games recently 😁
Do no one actually mentioned how those so called "critics" give this game a score of 79? really makes you wonder.
@@b.o.353 I love how EA capitalists try to pay the critics for the lower pars! Especially when Ndivia showed the crap performance trailer
10/10 ! Would take advertising cash and insider access again!
never trust corporate based critics and " *video-game journalists* " they're just suckers for money and their experience is only worth as much as they are in bed *seconds or minutes at best
Corruption. They all get a slice of the cake from the devs or the publisher. Or the parent company. Whichever, they get paid for a good score. There is no more honesty. Critics have long lost their spine, and have been crawling under these big dogs for a while now.
@@CaptainPupu yeah, at least not from these "big" ones, on minor blogs, yt channels, etc there still is some more decent reviews and critics
Fans: All we want is a functional game.
EA: I missed the part where that's my problem.
EA: gonna cry?
EA: See ya chump
EA: Im gonna put some dirt in your eyes
EA: You'll get your functional game when you give me more money!
@@darthrevan7690EA: piss your pants maybe?
Fans: “Cod Vanguard sucks, I can’t wait to play Battlefield 2042!”
EA: “Don’t get your hopes up, kid.”
Cod vanguard is another you tho
I’d like but it’s at 69 (never mind)
both games are trash lol not wasting my money lol at least halo works lol
EA was not about to let Rockstar take the throne !
@@ducksfan9985 lmfao 😂 you right
I miss the old days, when we still though that AC:Unity and Watchdogs were the most disappointing AAA "scandals".
Good times
And funny how one Michael Mazzacane (AKA Theretroreplay) said in his review of Watch Dogs 1 that to him it represented everything wrong with the video game industry at the time.
Elite Unity came back with a people warm up to the game people change their opinion about the game
everything went downhill after those, feels like all other company take those examples like "That's great! Write that down!"
@@arxeha Everything was progressively going downhill for a long time. this is just where we're at now.. I am surprised that people bought this game even after that obviously glitchy official trailer...
Now we just need to wait couple months before we start leaning about BF2042 development hell, like it was with Anthem.
No rush to buy an "new" game, since they all tend to have so many bugs and problems. Maybe if gamers were smarter and waited to buy a game or stop pre-ordering it would actually force companies to put out actual good games.
semper fi
But gamers aren't smart.
These companies know the majority of gamers are addicts and exploit their compulsive buying habits.
@@glang5154 My friend described the AAA games industry in the most eloquent way possible: “AAA games are designed and sold exclusively for the lowest common denominator of gamers”.
Yup. This seems to be the tone of reddit too, people need to stop being stupid and fricking impatient and rushing to buy the “new toy”. If you have an issue with this game and you bought it, you’re part of the problem. Vote with your wallet.
Facts it’s that simple
They day we get some good news about the gaming industry is the day the simulation breaks
Last night I encountered a glitch in the matrix so that say might be close lol.
Halo multiplayer is out for FREEEE!!!!
@@viniciuscoxoba3842 HELL FUCKING YEAAAHHH
Correction, WESTERN gaming industry. Shin Megami Tensei V just released and is so far amazing.
@@viniciuscoxoba3842 yeeeeees
The way games are getting released lately is why I don’t even bother with new games at the moment.
I’m just going back and playing old ones
Same. I started many games recently with the ps now and there's ton of very good "old" games. For instance metal gear rising revengeance which is a blast!
@@Manudyne I’m doing the same bro. I bought that game and haven’t touched it but I will once I’m done with gta IV again. Been having a blast with them ragdoll physics
@@Manudyne Im just starting Death Stranding Directors Cut and been playing other games that i actually claimed for free! To hell with these publishers games rn, they need these franchises stripped from them and then they should be forced to restart from scratch.
The only game I'm looking forward to is Payday 3
@@Manudyne I also played MGS4 on PS Now from PS4 it was still a solid experience!
"its just the beta it will get better, they will fix everything" , so tired of hearing this and now look where we are now lol.
Edit: I really wanted to look forward for this battlefield since I was a fan of battlefield 3 but with so many bugs and problems with the game I might just sit this one out and play something else. :/
Nice profile pic
I’m more tired of them calling gameplay previews betas. If you’re only a few weeks from release it’s not a freaking beta.
Don't expect the game to be fixed from beta, expect for it to be even more broken. Since a beta/test version is a limited part of the game, so there can be plenty of more broken stuff in the full release.
Where we are now? Like a significantly improved game over the beta with no major issues whatsoever and small things that need work?
Only few betas I know of that worked are back 4 blood and just right now, halo infinite
You know what's really *fucked up* about BF 2042 is the simple fact that EA & DICE were allowed to make a BF game WITHOUT a "campaign" so that they can "focus" *SOULY* on *MULTIPLAYER* and they *STILL* FUCK IT UP! THEY HAD *ONE* JOB! JUST MAKE A GOOD MULTIPLAYER!!!
It's frustrating to see how bad this game is despite the potential the game has.
Bf 2042: "no u don't...."
BO4: "we are now brothers... And u can't change it!"
EA doing EA things
@@countofelysium9070
EA ruining beloved franchises with a dedicated furvor and burning passion.
It would almost be impressive how many franchises they've pretty much ruined if it wasn't so damn sad.
That feeling when Battlefield 3, a ten year old game, has better destruction, more weapons, better team play, more viewable stats, better squad play, better classes than it's most recent successor. Fucking disgraceful.
It's pretty funny to me I knew this would happen so I didn't buy it.
Its actually sad. The lack of content hurts the most. They didn’t even have to make a campaign. What were they doing all those years man.
@@Paradyn This is the end result of gamers buying too many shitty games and letting them get away with it. Congrats you have been introduced to the AAA darkage of gaming where no one is accountable for shit.
better squad and team play is kind of the same shit :))
@@larrythorn6265 What does socialism have to do with BF2042? Also your account was created 3 days ago so I'm assuming you're a troll or something else
This is completely reflective on where AAA gaming is headed. My goodness have we fallen a long way since 2007.
Headed??! We already reached the destination!! We are there!!🤣🤣
and I thought it was going to be nothing but the sky as the limit after halo 3 blew me away
@@Maru7en You telling me halo 3 blew you away more than breaking Benjamin?
@@artemkoropotkin3047 wtf is that, the graphics leap was incredible yes
Noh, noh, we haven't fallen, we've Regressed BACK to 2007 (and beyond!) as with every "advancement" in Hardware and Software everything gets WORSE somehow. O.o
... and they're pushing for higher base prices for games now. Perfect irony.
@@Elatenl No. Their claim of "we need more money wahhh" has nothing to do with inflation. It's pure greed. While I'm not denying inflation is going to rise relatively quickly in the coming years, that has literally NOTHING to do with why they want to increase the cost of the games.
@@Elatenl The Fed said they believe current inflationary pressures to be transitory.
@@dakota9821 This is exactly it games are making record profits despite increasing team sizes behind AAA games and the ludicrous payouts to CEO’s and executives, there is literally no need for higher prices.
@@claystar9valor And you believe them?
If so, I got a bridge to sell you...
@@lycanwarrior2137 What the “Fed” said makes more sense than Ea saying we need more money to make games lmao
It's kinda funny to me how we got three shooters from three series this year and only one hasn't launched as a complete mess. For free might I add, Halo is just the most polished and most fun fps out right now.
And even then, it was only because of the backlash last year that it was delayed a year. It would have launched in an unfinished state if the gameplay reveal wasn’t so negatively received.
Now if only the rest of these devs would listen to the players we'd probably get more solid and functional games. I waited since the very first reveal of Infinte to play it, I could've waited another year for 2042, Vanguard and GTA Trilogy lol
"Don't like it don't buy it" -EA/DICE July 2018
I haven't forgotten .. and I whole heartedly agree.
Me too...
"And I took that personally "
"Battlefield 2042 is another disastrous launch for EA"
When did they ever stop, really?
Ikr?
@@naiveoptimist5637
REMEMBER ANTHEM!?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@keronstewart9446 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🍺
@@keronstewart9446 Until you mentioned it, no I did not remember Anthem and I prefer it that way.
@@danielbrown5986
then there is mass effect Andromeda which crashed & burned more badly than anthem!
don't forget that!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
right now, EA & Activision/Blizzard is racing to bottom!
am i right!?
"Do not buy this until everything is fixed", that can be said for nearly every game these days
Except Nintendo games, thankfully. Always highly polished on release.
@@MrTalithan very true, I just wish they werent lacking so much in other areas, like online multiplayer features.
@@randop-r9r True that. It's Ninty's biggest sore spot to be sure.
Lol me and my friends have been playing B4B. The game was already unforgiving in its difficulty. Then the devs buffed the special infected health (why?) and nerfed player cards, (again, why??) while also creating a bug that spawns double special, (which apparently is very hard to fix somehow) essentially making the game unplayable on anything besides easy. $80 game though!! Nothing from the beta was fixed at all, all bugs still present. Just pleasant.
@@MrTalithan Maybe first party titles... but the shit they port over runs worse than my disabled father.
Battlefield 1 was one of my favorite FPS of all time. My God, how far they've fallen in so little time.
Thats sad my man, BF1 was a shell of what the game used to be.
oh boy, you’re lucky you weren’t emotionally attached to Bad Company 2 like a lot of us
Have not played Battlefield since Battlefield: Vietnam
@@kaomatic ikr, BC2 was a charm
@Lucy Ducy and the franchise has sucked donkey balls ever since
Remember when the CEO said “I can see battlefield being a yearly release” bro was so confident in this game , but that’s CEO’s they don’t care of the quality of a game just that fat paycheck they get from us
I guess what he had in mind was: they can sell something with the words Battlefield written on it yearly and make money back ...
@@miagi1337 same strategy Activision is doing witb COd and Ubisoft doing with AC
He is probably thinking in the same line as FUT. Release Battlefield games yearly so that gamers will have to re-buy all the micritransaction stuff they've bought just rhe year prior.
Now I finally feel justified in not being hyped for this game
Amen brother, amen.
I havent been excited since BF4 sadly
@@michaelulloa12 I feel ya
The game is Fantastic 18 hrs into it and all I want is To keep playing like the game way more than BF5 and BF1 combined!
@@michaelulloa12 Battlefield 1 was a masterpiece, sorry you missed out on one of the best games ever made.
I'm honestly surprised people were genuinely hyped for this game, they seemed to have forgotten that this is EA we're talking about
Hype has that effect
I never had hope when it was first revealed. I just kept thinking to myself, how are they gonna screw this up?
EXACTLY EVERYONE KNOWS EA WILL SCREW YOU YET KEEP BUYING THEIR CRAP. I swear if we as a society do not start educating people and enforcing against flagrant greed we are doomed
@@captaintoyota3171 don’t act like you have the moral high ground
It’s been long time I’ve played a FPS there’s apex but it’s a battle Royale. Last time was cod modern warfare 2019. I skip Cold War, BFV .
2042 was a glimmer a hope but now is not.
AAA game companies are taking the crowdfunding concept to the extreme: asking players to buy an incomplete game at full price for them to see how bad it is now and _maybe_ fund fixes. Except if they've secured your money, what incentive do they have to fix?
I hope I wasn’t the only that found it funny that YY is wearing the “sense of pride and accomplishment”shirt while talking about another EA failure😂
you know he saw the news and fished that shirt out specifically for it.
Yet these dopes continue to buy these gAmes year after year. How many times will they buy a game on launch, hCe a completely broken game and act surprised?! Shame on them for buying the damn thing and expecting something different. EA and Activision will never change because they don’t need to.
You see what he did there.
Wouldn't be shocked if he did it on purpose.
It's on purpose.
"Better than GTA Definitive" is not a particularly high bar to clear. It's about on par with "Smarter than Aqua from Konosuba" or "A better driver than Mazepin"
I hate it when people go "Hey, it's better than [insert game.]" You shouldn't be comparing it to another bad game, you should be aiming for it to become a good game
Incredible!!! Rockstar made rdr2, EA made bf3,4, bad company 1 and 2. They have the formula for success
"Unlocking four suppressors is literally baffling "
Lol, i get it.
Lmao
Good boy.
Yong didn’t get it, but to be fair, I didn’t expect him to.
People are growing tired of AAA game makers releasing unfinished games that they hope customers will tolerate constant updates to make the game acceptable.
Totally unacceptable.
Only when enough people grow tired of this practice is when they'll take notice and maybe change their ways...I hope.
That hovercraft clip was truly a "only in Battlefield moment".
I was really hoping Battlefield would take over this year. Somehow Vanguard is better than this. How could this have happened? 😔
Its the future dude, comon!
I found this one quite funny.
@@Brimst0ne_XB Vanguard is better..... 😂
Hopefully, if it's a bug, they never fix it. That's such an awesome strat!
Not to sound like an old man, but *puts on wise elderly man voice* back in my day games had to actually be completed before being put on sale, no fancy dancy patches and roadmaps in those days.
Good old times. I remember son. 😊
@Name You mean like GTA Triology or CP? Ahhh yeah. Great Multiplayer Games. Sorry but nope. This Time… his Comment just is what it is.
Correct. 100%. Just let it be.
@METAN ARC Nintendo is worth 85 billion. So how many years could they go without making money. I think Microsoft is worth 400 + billion. Since gaming is main stream... not looking good. Just think this game is gonna be a mess and it's literally ONLY multiplayer.
@Name *looks to the pokemon diamond and pearl remakes and No Man's Sky*
You sure about that?
@Name Madden.....an every year title that is literally a reskin every year and just pulls old features from older years then calls it new ....is still a buggy mess, same animations, same cut scenes....
So basically, we are at a point where EA and Activision's yearly releases for their FPS titles have basically scrapped the bottom of the barrel. Almost seems like Halo Infinite is about to run away with it just by "launching properly."
@@Moostar95 wait, BF doesn’t have a scoreboard anymore??
@@3Guys1Video yep
Well no actually it’s worse, they’re taking things out of each release, to the point you’ll just spawn and die instantly and that will be the entire game.
Seriously this game has no voice chat, no real general chat, no scoreboard the list goes on.
The worst thing is at least cod games are finished at launch. This one is not.
@@superbattledroid1862 That’s the game if you’re braindead.
I always count down the days to a AAA release so I can take some popcorn and view these videos and gag reels. As for the game itself: I'll just buy it for 50% off 2 months later, if at all.
Same it will be on sale right before Christmas my estimate is 39.99$
“We’re way ahead of schedule”
*delays for month and a half*
“Biggest battlefield ever!”
*22 guns total, maps that are mostly empty and have no attention to detail (ambient sound, environmental small structures like tables and chairs, graffiti, litter, foliage diversity, player interactions and general animations)*
But the sq/ft is at least greater filled with all that nothing and void!
I swear to God battlefield 2042's main issue that its trying to be too many things at once and it sucks at being any of them. I only had fun playing portal. The regular multiplayer felt like shit.
Greater sq footage and filled with nothing? Sounds like they’ve been reading Ubisoft’s notes
Maps are way to clean you are right. I logged in Battlefield 1 last night and had a look at the desert maps and the difference is night and day compared to 2042. Same as the desert maps on battlefield V. Playing battlefield 2042 feels like playing a F2P FPS game, what the hell happened?!?!?!!
You just described most open world games. Big empty map with nothing to do. This is why i said in a video recently about BF that the game would flop because aiming for stupid large maps with that amount of players when they could have focused on like 32-64 player maps that are smaller but way more detailed.
@@thebigzan Yea i don’t get the appeal of making anything that large… is this wut BF fans wanted ?
I know nostalgia can be a drug and misleading, but good lord do I wish for the days where aside from the occasional screwup, like Big Rigs or Superman N64, every videogame was functional at launch and that was an industry wide expectation.
big rigs isn't a screw up, it's a comedy game in disguise
I think you're misremembering things tbh. There were a lot of fucking terrible games that released throughout gaming history, but they faded into obscurity for being awful. Back then there wasn't the same level of attention on individual releases as there is now, given the much larger volume of players out there. This is especially true on PC. Look no further than Ross's Game Dungeon to find a few games that were lost to history for good reasons. "Armed and Delirious" was a 5 CD game which no human was ever meant to beat. Not for its difficulty per se, but for its ability to erode the mind of anyone who would witness it.
@@Rehteal aight, bro, any popular game from 2006 to 2014 had it’s great reasons to be pretty much an industry standard of “released polished and equal in value to a $60 price tag”. Nowadays they’ve just went and fucked that dream in the ass and just said “fuck it, release the beta as the full game and kink it out in the following 8 months. The only developers that actually release finished game with great quality seem to be those that are working with singleplayer, not online always games like spiderman, god of war, doom eternal and such. Now that I think about it, pretty much online multiplayer games have just been cash grabs at this point :) thank you for reading my ted talk
@@jancarloberrios6234 companies don't care about making a game that has a legacy to it. They just make games as a job now.
@@Rehteal They're talking about bugs. Games had to be released in a decent state because there were no patches. There were still buggy games, but games ship straight up unplayable at times now.
“Game is lacking a lot of content”
“People are asking for basic features like scoreboard”
Oh hey I know this one this is where they sell you the stuff you actually wanted as dlc post launch
Yeah, Battlefront 2 comes to mind. Can't wait until I can unlock a skin after 100 hours to feel a sense of pride.
They could sell the scoreboard as a DLC for 9,99$.
This is the one where they're gonna hold back the shit that should have been in the game from the very start, slowly add it back in over the course of 5 years and everyone is going to love them for it! Truely a classic
@@TheShadowNetwork. For some games, managing to rack up 100+ hours without wanting to off yourself is indeed a huge achievement.
Dood i remember battlefield 4's launch and i though *that* was unacceptable. This isnt even a battlefield game anymore. How did the development team forget to make buildings destructible, thats been battlefields gimmick for 10+ years
EA just debunked the myth that skipping the single player campaign results in a better multiplayer experience. I hope they bring back the campaign for the next game.
As long as ur game development quality is literally in the gutter, singleplayer or multiplayer, doesn't matter
Gamers will keep forking over the money so the industry will continue to decline.
Let’s be honest, the hovercraft being able to climb up the side of the building should stay as a feature.
Sex
@@cuyospartan02 with your mother
@@6kine6tic67 no u
@@cuyospartan02 xDD
It's onle of those silly things like hitching a right on plane wings in BF1942
Hilarious that Battlefield and Gta totally faceplanted, even though they're technically "finished" games and halo infinite multi-player releases early in beta and has better performance and overall experience quality than Battlefield or gta trilogy.
bro halo is gooooooooood, 343 came thru and pulled it together. props to them. i quit playing at halo 4 and this shit just feels fresh and fun
@@cutie1427 the only problem is the XP earning, which shouldn’t be to hard to fix.
Bro I heard it’s free to play too
@@bhabiecorleone3764 it is. Try it out, it's really freaking fun actually.
So much fun. Addictive to a fault and good gametypes. I’ve probably lost more games than won, but it’s still fun to play. I don’t care about the fact that we lost, just give me my Halo and call it a day. Yes the progression system could and should be implemented better, but so long as it’s not pay to win, you’re good in my book.
As I’ve aged over the years, it’s gone from being excited for fame releases to being excited for patch notes to get the game up to snuff.
Glad I didn’t waste my time and money for this disaster.
I keep telling people, "Never buy a post-2005 EA game at launch."
No no no, even if they rerelease a pre-2005 game, dont buy it at launch. Even if they offer to bring you back in time to 2004- some shit is going to go wrong and youre going to end up disappointed somehow
-at- -launch-
l would put it at least to 2004. That was when they shut down Westwood Studios.
I don't buy EA games at all
I don't buy EA games at all
Every day I relate more to the RedLetterMedia quote “How does it feel to have lived long enough to watch all your favorite franchises go down in flames?”
It feels great...
And then eventually you don't feel anything except knowing when it might die
Its a life od disappoitment.... In case You not in to cars. After 20 fucking years Honda showed new Integra last week. Integra dc2 was my dream car moved to uk to be able to afford one and had one over 10 years. The best FWD analog car ever made. And they show this fucking piece of shit new one with 4 doors 1.5 looking worse than civic at 30 grand. Just another thing that died for me. With every year im closer to suicide health problems combined with direction EVERYTHING is going just lost anything to look forward to . Health getting worse games getting worse movies getting worse music getting worse... Got to point where got nothing left to look forward to from all things activities that i loved and had as hobbies... I just exist to be more depressed anddisappointed as time passes by :( meds from therapist are keekping me around.
Endless Trash.
Die a hero or live long enough to be the villian
Rich Evan's is the best.
So typical of EA to just launch a game that is half done.
Why stop they are going for a world record lol
@@FOXZILLA5734 lmao 🤣🤣
They panicked, thinking Rockstar was coming for the throne after GTA trilogy trash.
It’s typical of nearly every publisher these days.
@@Elatenl EA had no faith in fallen order and didn't really interfere with it, when it launched it proved them how wrong they were about single player games.
Halo Infinite is by far the only game in recent time to be well-polished on release and to go back to its roots regarding atmosphere (OSTs & art direction) and gameplay - a breath of fresh air really.
Yeah, the only thing I see people complaining about with that is the progression system which is already planned to be replaced and the HUD not feeling right.
Which goes to show that rushing games to release is a terrible idea.
@@guybrush20X6 agreed. As disappointed as I was to not be able to play Halo Infinite last year I’m glad it was.
EA back then:”Singleplayer games are dead”.
EA now: They can’t even make a fully functional multiplayer game. Bunch of jokers.
It honestly reminds me too much of when I'm having a good match and halfway through my team suddenly forgets how to play the game
To think they came out saying there will be no campaign in this game because they would rather focus those resources on making the Multiplayer better. Where the FUCK did those resources go? Or if this is WITH the campaign resources used, how bad was it before? Did it even fucking launch at all?
How many teams were part of this game and they *still* couldn’t do it. Battlefield is dead and they killed it.
Except jokers are funny
This is sad
They say single player is dead, so now multiplayer is next on their hitlist, i guess?
EA looks at GTA V Online
“So you guys like flying cars?”
Unfortunately this is the norm now. The amount of people I see saying to "wait for the day 1 patch" instead of being mad as hell that they paid extra to play a broken game early just boggles my mind.
Ironically its mostly newer players and few veteran players
Or people who still try the whole 'it's a beta, the release will be better'.
In this case it's seems the beta may have actually been in BETTER shape than the release build.
Fortunately those consoomers are a minority
Getting mad never really fixed anything.
Yall only rage on the web instead of achieving anything.
You see this guy making the Video raging? Naah he just bringing up points.
Getting mad doesn't fix anything but refunding will
How is this not actually considered a scam? I'm genuinely curious. Especially if you buy in on playstation or something that you'll never get a refund on.
Fans: When do we have fun?
EA: That's the fun part, you don't.
EA: The fun part was when you paid us!
This games faults ain't EA fault at all.
@@robato3991 EA is the publisher, if they want the developers to release the game unfinished to meet deadlines or include microtransactions, that is what the studio has to abide by.
And it's sad people still defend this game. I'm sick of the phrase "it'll get better within a year"That's BS the game should be great at launch problems happen but this is outrageous.
Imagine paying $80+ to play this garbage early too, and then try justifying it to yourself. Sadly a large portion of gaming consumers are destroying the industry, and they don't understand why
Agreed, that kind of mentality needs to go. It's one thing for a game to need some polishing after launch due to unpredicted bugs or something, it's another when the game looks and feels unfinished when you play it (if the bugs let you play it).
Imagine looking for a car, and the one offered to you is lacking half of the promised features, the other half isn't functional 100% of the time, and could potentially endanger you. No one would buy such a car, regardless of "it'll be fixed later!" or not.
Imagine you would refuse to pay for this game and tell EA "my 60 bucks will arrive within a year". :-D
I don't expect a perfect glitch free game at release, but this is a beta game being released. You're literally paying for a game that's not finished. It's a buy now, play later situation.
The success of battlefield 1 probally reason they defending it
This is even more devastating given the fact that Halo Infinite Multiplayer has just been released for free on Steam and Xbox and people can flock there, rather than players paying $60 for a multiplayer-only game.
Halo is back boiiissss
@@Elatenl You're right. Halo is vastly superior than Battlefield.
@@Elatenl they are different, but they are nevertheless competing for players attention in the same release window. BF2042 having these problems is only going to help Halo, people will leave BF and go to Halo instead
It's a beta
@@ls200076 And yet somehow the Halo beta is better than the Battlefield launch.
The shitty thing is that EA knew that BF 2042 is going to be bad cuz an EA executive sold their stock in November 17, 2 days before the game launch. Actually insanity.
Who would've guessed that the so called "months-old beta" was actually how the final game turned out?
It’s as if they convinced themselves that it would actually be fixed.🤣🤣🤣
@@MonsieurDrobot My thoughts exactly.
Yeah, that was a shit load of BS.
I completely guessed that shit 🤣🤣🤣
bf4 even more bugged when it first launch
once again, another AAA title that reaffirms my position that the most fun ive ever had with games now are from smaller devs and at a fraction of the cost
Valheim, 20$ everyone, like 10 devs...
Binding of Isaac Repentance came out on console on the 4th, just thought you should know.
Phasmophobia and hollow knight 👍
This year I preferred Japanese and Chinese studios. I did only buy Assassin's Creed Valhalla, because I love big open world games. At least Valhalla works as intended.
Did you never play the new god of war?
"There is no second first impression", when AAA titles understand that? first impression is the most important thing to have of a game, sadly this game will die like BFV died early
I'm with you on the first impression, is important, sadly there's too many people, who dpsen't know or care and preorder the game.
Then you have the opposite where Halo Infinite MP launched today super clean, really good looking and already trending upward because of it
On one hand they both those first impressions, but on the other they're entirely focused on quarterly revenue.
@@Mehrunes86 ppl kept deeming this to be the "COD killer", I'm not taking sides but I'm real dissapointed in BF 2042 as of rn.
@@jamesvancam Battlefield 4 was the CoD killer and it did well in its early years, all they had to do was improve the formula but no they had to be EA and fix what wasnt broke, call their fanbase uneducated because we pointed out that WW2 didnt have women on the frontlines in western countries, they spun one of the missions that was carried out by british commandos and french resistance to make it seem like 2 women did it ALL on their own just cause the lead Devs lil girl, who shouldnt be playing an MA15+ title to begin with, said why cant i be a girl in your game about a historical war Daddy?
I have saved so much money and avoided so much disappointment by just waiting for game reviews! DO NOT buy day one, don’t give gaming companies money they do not deserve.
The last game I pre-ordered was No Man Sky 2016. Never pre-ordered again!
We're definitively in the "Age of Unfinished Releases" for gaming.
Not on the Indie sector, though more than half the devs are on early access for playtesters to find bugs and exploits or areas of improvement.
Let's all laugh at an industry that never learns anything tee hee hee
Halo
@@Aereto honestly I find I buy an early access Game, play for a bit, and then never go back
@@PaulsGamingLive I'm happy to see halo off to a good start with its multi-player. I'm remaining hopeful for the campaign.
The fact that anyone expected anything better from DICE and EA is the biggest surprise to me.
@@nunogloop3386 Yes it's the worst game I've played in a long time.
the more I see these games, the more I appreciate ghost of tsushima for being a great game at launch
Ghost of Tsushima was always a masterpiece at launch.
basically every other devs game release besides EA, Ubisoft, Activision and R*/Take Twos poor excuse for a video game. Even Square Enix didn't rush the developers of Guardians of the Galaxy, and it turned out good.
@@cyanprince00 Especially some studios that did an stellar work on their respective games: Santa Monica Studio, Quantic Dream, SuckerPunch and Insomniac.
You had to name off one of the most boring games ever to showcase "good games"? God of War is better than that trash. Might as well have just said that game instead. Not only is it true but its a really good game and not too old.
@@TheREALHugo4 and naughty dog
On Reddit, when we first got the reveal trailer, I posted a thread where I voiced some concerns about the direction the game is taking, both in design and gameplay. Back then, I was crucified, with people saying how proud they are for preordering the most expensive edition of the game, expecting me to have a breakdown over them paying EA to release a mediocre game.
I laughed at them back then, and I am laughing at them even harder now. Everything I was concerned about has proven to be the truth - even worse.
- Server stability: one guy, claiming to be a server expert, said that there wouldn't be any problems with the servers despite the 128 player count. I laugh at that guy.
- Specialist balance: an "insider" said that the specialists will be 100% limited, that there won't be a "meta" specialist. I laugh at that guy.
- Map size: while people have been creaming their pants at the mention of insanely large maps, I look at the previous largest maps and see how they play poorly. And having triple the size of those maps, with just double the player count, I knew that the issue would be even worse. Lo and behold! Most of the time you are walking, while the vehicle slots are filled and no one wants to give you a lift. When you see that your sector is being capped, just the next sector over, by the time you arrive a single guy can cap it.
- The design: it's a hero shooter, despite people in denial trying to say otherwise. Named characters with special abilities are called "heroes" in this industry. This is "Battlefield: Near Future Clone Wars". Only 8 people are fighting in this war, just copied and pasted. Their designs are meh, their voiceovers range from okay to the levels of cringe where both the voice actors and directors should be fired, as well as anyone who okayed the amount of cringe that's spewing out of the specialists' mouths. They are not even cheesy, just painfully cringe. You want NoPats? Give us the player customization in two parts: USA and Russia - with specific skins for each side that will NOT break the design of the game (Warzone is already a clown fest in regards to this, Battlefield V also turned into it, but Battlefield 2042 doesn't have to - but it definitely will).
- Specialist design philosophy: no one cares about them. We don't have a story to care about them. Because we don't have a singleplayer campaign. You know, the environment which we can use to learn about the conflict, to learn the mechanics of the game - even if the story is mediocre. We don't have that. People high on copium actually believe that these specialist carry the story. They don't. Irish has no reason to fight for the Russians. Boris has no reason to fight for the Americans. The very idea of these NoPats is dumb - because we don't have fictional factions, we have established, IRL factions. There is no reason for Webster to be fighting on both sides. Why does he fight for USA? Or Russia? Or whoever? The reason I got is "he's a NoPat"... That's not a reason at all. If he has no country allegiances, why is he fighting for this specific side? There needs to be an explanation. You know what would have helped to actually clear that dumb plot hole? Eight more specialists, for the Russian side. Because we already know that USA has a hard on for having Russia as her enemy, then have 8 specialists be from different countries who are friendly with Russia, in her sphere of influence. Same with the USA, have Irish fight for his country, and a few other "western" countries, so Americans can jerk themselves off with this cold war recreation, but for resources now, instead of creating puppet governments. The concept is dumb, specialists shouldn't exist, and their unique gadgets should be limited to a class... you know, a CLASS, the thing which worked since Battlefield 1942 and which gives Battlefield its identity.
-The gameplay: some Battlefield UA-camrs have already pointed it out, but this is not a strategic nor tactical Battlefield. This is a mindless sandbox, with no direction, and the purpose of which is to create those sweet meme videos for UA-cam, because God knows you won't be pulling great tactical moves with this one, where one good flank could decide the whole match and turn it around. Too much freedom means no direction. And without a direction, there's no balance.
- The three packages: Hazard zone sucks. It's unnecessary, has no replay value, does nothing new, other games have done the same kind of gameplay far better and gives better rewards which actually mean something. All Out Warfare, as discussed above, is a mess. Portal is the only saving grace, where players can actually make a good Battlefield game for DICE, for free. It's the only thing I'd give money for. And it should be separate packages. I don't want to pay full price for one third of the game which I'll actually play, while the second third is an unimaginative snore fest and the final third is an unbalanced catastrophe with no design direction.
The NoPats are also mercenaries, working for either side.
@@BridgesProductions2024 So no armies, just random all over the world mercenaries with no army allegiance, fighting in a global conflict for resources? "Let's not equip our own men from the coalition with standard equipment and a command structure, but hire 8 people and clone them into oblivion". Do you need me to tell you how idiotic that is? I hope you don't.
@@StivKobra You seem to immediately assume that I like the game. I was one of those people that really liked the lore before the game came out. Just because I’ve got something that, to be honest, ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION, doesn’t mean I like the game. Nor will I defend it either.
@@StivKobra All I did was answer your question. I don’t want an argument.
@@BridgesProductions2024 I already knew what the NoPats are. Even so, the lore is dumb. Not only is it dumb, but it's not translated well into the game at all thanks to cringy specialists.
And all I did was point out how idiotic the premise is.
Don’t buy the game even after the patch. That’s when your justified frustration matters.
I love when individuals defend these huge companies and studioes that only see them as those bots in xp farms
Lol
People on jackfrags' channel seem to think there's nothing wrong
Brand loyalty it's the worst thing imaginable
kek
Don't get me wrong I like the game but it's fucking broken they need to fix it ASAP or take the thing away from steam etc and fix it
@@KingShibe It's either stupid kids or bots. There are probably millions and millions of bots on the internet that type messeges on UA-cam, Reddit and other platforms. In todays world do not assume you are talking to a human anymore.
_Battlefield 20-42 FPS_ is my fav joke right there. lmao give that man a can of coke.
Oh you meant like the soda 🙃
A jar of coke
A barrel of coke
Well you saw it. Grab a can of coke. 👨🏻
"Now this is what I call a 'surprise mechanic'." That killed me lol.
Your spelling kills me.
It's just another EArly access game. Don't worry guys the full release will be out in a year or two.
About 3 or 4
Or it gets dropped out of service like BF5.
Its an early build the day one patch will fix it remember it was made in the PANDEMIC!
@@stickboy8219 day one was 4 days ago
@@Bandit_iso also if the game couldn't be released in a good state because of the "PANDEMIC!" Then they should have delayed it to sometime in early or mid 2022. There's no excuse.
Can we go back a generation or two?
When companies actually TRIED.
Thing is, a generation or two ago, gaming was new and people were uncertain. These days gaming is mature, and people are sheep.
Want to make companies try? Pressure them. They respond to nothing else.
@@Ealsante gaming was not new in the 360 era what you you talking about dude
Back then there were no microtransactions and gacha, so companies were really focused on making good games instead of ways to steal money.
Good thing we have more indie studios that offer at least something interesting and functional.
This is why I've bought maybe two cheaper games in the last year: I've been playing Final Fantasy XIV, and it is, amazingly, only getting better and better each year. Two years ago, they launched the Shadowbringers expansion, which lead to many long time fans of the single player games (including myself) to declare XIV the best FF ever, but then, close to a year later, when they released patch 5.3, and the added story content was, arguable, even better than Shadowbringers! This PATCH had a more powerful story than the majority of gaming studios EVER manage to achieve throughout their entire careers!
Stop buying publicly traded companies games. They only care about money. The one exception is Capcom with Resident Evil series.
Rmember when EA tweeted that DICE is “way ahead” of schedule with Battlefield 6 development?
It was way ahead.
Way ahead of being a Battlefield game.
From now on, everytime they are ahead means we the playesr will be later on beside ourselves. :->
I remember when they "gave" devs an extra year to build the game. Seems like that is when they started.
@@DamienDarksideBlog hmmm... shades of Anthem.
They probably were, but then had to change alot of things and ended up releasing the game unfinished
The best thing happening in gaming right now is hearing everyone's experiences playing Elden Ring
Forza horizon 5 too
@@fabienlefrancois8819 yup!! That too man that looks awesome
@@fabienlefrancois8819 Don't forget Halo Infinite's multiplayer launching early for FREE!!
I just assume AAA games will be shit these days.
At this point, it is a foregone conclusion.
I mean, over the last few years, how many AAA launches have proven you wrong? The odds are that you're right.
Honestly, my most anticipated this year was Tales of Arise... And I don't think that can be called AAA
@@FlyingFocs Most Bandai Namco games shouldnt be considered AAA.
They seem pretty low budget with good enough gameplay
"Better than GTA Definitive edition"
Yeah, and rats are cleaner than pigs; It's not exactly a high bar to surpass.
you have never seen a pig or a rat irl
Pigs are actually cleaner than rats.
And to think we eat pigs and not rats...
You guys are really fun
I feel a sense of pride and accomplishment when watching this review
I felt that when I didn't purchase the game
I dont want to feel that way, but i do as well. I wanted the game to be great, and its trash :(
Yup, they ain’t getting me
I was absolutely never been hyped since the beginning. So many sheep and blind fanboys were yelling how this game was going to be amazin af lol. Gaming Industry is an absolute joke fr.
Same... Didn't buy BFV and this pile of steaming crap... Actually I didn't buy any EA games since they told me not to buy their games.
I just don't understand how this keeps happening. How have they not learned their lesson by now? Truly incredible.
They aren’t going to learn their lesson if they keep making millions on launch. Sure, the game will have bad scores across the board but that money.
What lesson though? The only thing the executives care about is increasing shareholder value. The only thing that could convince them to change course is a large drop in share prices. Even then, it's unlikely that they would actually conclude what you would like them to ("we should make better games") and any change in strategy would be temporary until the share prices stabilize - then it's back to business as usual (i.e. get as much profit as you can).
This isn't just an EA thing, it's true for pretty much all major publishers. It goes back to a doctrine called "shareholder theory", which basically states that a company's sole responsibility is to the shareholders. The chief executives are essentially their employees and answer only to them. They don't have any ethical or moral obligations towards their customers or employees; and they should engage in every business or employment practice that can increase value for shareholders as long as it isn't outright illegal. Once you know that, it starts to make sense why so many AAA publishers engage so readily in seemingly irrational and self-destructive practices.
Well, it`s fairly simple when you look who is in charge.
Those game studios usually were founded by gamers who wanted to make their passion into a profession. As those companies grew more and more ppl at the top were replaced by suits who mainly cared about making money. Or you have passionate companies being bought up by bigger companies. In the end you have the passionate ppl at the bottom without much say in the decision making process while the clueless executives from above are just giving orders.
Since those executives usually don`t know much about game design and or really care about the games themselves you keep getting sh*tshow release after sh*tshow release. And as long as they are bound to those executives or a substantial part of gamers would stop preordering games to check if they actually are worth buying there won`t be any change.
I'm not surprised ea launched the game like this I'm just surprised people actually buy it. At this point i don't feel sorry for anyone who buys ea products u deserve what u get
STOP BUYING
I am not. Kids will buy any garbage as long as its hot. Its the game industry after all, not some novel club or something.
Star Wars Jedi Fallen was good, other than that it's all been shit
@@dansan9858 Claiming it's just "kids" is an ignorant statement at this point
@@CinderFox98 Where did I say its just kids?
As long as people pay for unfinished games, they will continue making unfinished and unpolished games.
At the returns are diminishing. Just look at Call of Duty.
@@frankieseward8667 At least Bobby Kotick is in a big trouble... lets see if Activition gets a new CEO :) im waiting for YongYea and AngryJoe to cover this history :D
As long as people defend unfinished games they will continue to release unfinished games. WAAAAAAAY too many people defending the beta as if there were going to be any actual changes before the release date.
*Everyone disappointed by Vanguard and Battlefield*
Halo Infinite: "On your left"
seriously 343 did a major big dick play releasing the multiplayer "beta" early and so far I haven't heard any major complaints on it from the technical side from my friends and others yet.
@@MrToren01 plays well
To be honest
Xbox is really on a roll, it suprises me Yong has yet to talk about the runaway success of Forza Horizon 5
6 MILLION PEOPLE PLAYING
@@MrToren01 This year has actually been a great demonstration of the power of betas. Three months ago, people were hyped for Battlefield and wary of Halo. Two betas later and it has completely flipped.
King james, yong is a playstation fan, thats why. :)
BF2 from back in 2005 is still my favourite battlefield experience. Since then, nothing has quite lived up to that sense of teamwork and squad/commander play.
It's BF2142, for me. - It just took BF2 and stepped it up in terms of gameplay and fun. - That title is so overlooked and under-appreciated.
It's sad how DICE/EA just let it die, as it stopped working from one day to the next (in like 2007) and I couldn't get it to work with any "fix" out there.
And it's sad they never did anything in that setting anymore, apart from this reference with a DLC for a later game or something.
Titan Mode was something of a truly epic scale, especially for the time. - But then it also introduced a lot of lag with how ambitious it was.
And the modding. Glorious. They've phased out replay value. Planned obsolescence has reached the video game market.
what people seem to forget is that we lost a lot of content in this game just for a broken and lack of the content type of launch, lets go over what was removed, shall we.
No Campaign
No Naval Combat
One years worth of content cut from bfv
One years worth of content cut from star wars battlefront
All three teams at ea are working on the game
The game had an extra year in development
Planes are reskins of bfv planes (this is a fact look up videos comparing the two.)
It got delayed
And much more. Not to mention the amount of features that were removed from previous games the most notable and liked one being squad points. I seriously don’t know why dice would remove squad points. A feature everyone agreed was the highlight of bfv. It makes you wonder wtf was dice doing in these times.
Man, I knew it was bad. I didn't know it was THAT bad. Glad I listened to my gut - and really my head too - and didn't buy this shit.
Gaming these days is honestly shit. The industry would actually get the shakedown it needs if everyone just went back and played the older games.
Yeah it’s pretty much shit now, and people pay for this. Can’t believe how stupid they are to keep buying this.
So basically we lost the Eastern front and possibly the battle of the bulge and like 5 vehicles that were almost done for BFV and we got a rushed last DLC, lost Ahsoka and Ventress and a few issues that didn't get fixed in Battlefront 2 for this shit?, also removing a few features from BFV that were actually good, like the squad points, the soldier movement mechanics, the reinforcement on the points, and the tanks mechanics because in BFV the tanks actually feel like tanks, in 2042 they feel like glorified infantry because they are easy to kill
EA, Dice, what the fuck are you doing again
It’s almost as if game developers are so scared of releasing their games in a bad condition, that they do it for us to give them negative feedback that they can fix it with… it’s been decades and they still don’t know what fans like??? Do they not realise that battlefield was the alternative game to COD that everyone wanted to play because it’s such a unique and different game… but now they ruined it with this game. What a shame…
I don't necessarily think developers are at fault here. Most likely some corporate execs wanting to meet some annual financial quota and forced them to release the game in a sorry state.
@@Kalimdor199Menegroth yeah, you’re 100% right. I think it’s cause the developers don’t really have much freedom these days which is really sad
@@edeboy In a corporate environment they rarely have. In a corporation, the quality of the product becomes second priority or less. Main priority is meeting deadlines and the financial expectations of the shareholders. It is what it is. Unfortunately the fan base is not eager to punish these corporations with a boycott after so many botched releases. Otherwise I just can't understand why these corporations are getting away with every broken game they release. It is like this became the new normal.
Games are incredibly hard to make. Why would they be scared to release a bad game?
I've always looked at a Battlefield release date as the real Beta test date, the true Battlefield release date is usually 6-12 months after the "official launch".
BFV launched at $60 plus tax. 1 month later, half off.
Unfortunately, that’s nearly every game that releases nowadays. Single player games are the only ones launching as a finished product.
@@peaceful6571 not that I’m a huge call of duty fan (and I’m sure every reply will concur,) but Vanguard launched as an actual fully functional game. Like the game or not, at least it’s an actual game, which for a multiplayer prioritized AAA game is a damn rarity these days
Nah bf 1942 launched good, bf2 launched good. Bf bad company 1&2 good
I don't buy anything at launch nowadays. Been burned too many times.
"Having to unlock suppressors is literally baffling" I see what you did there.
Thanks for helping to ensure Halo's victory in multiplayer, EA. Genuinely as well.
Halo multiplayer be like: kill trocity
Honestly it would be funny to see Halo get to the top of the console FPS market again, even if I’m not a massive fan of the series’ multiplayer myself
STOP. PRE-ORDERING. GAMES.
When are people going to learn this....
can't teach a zombie new tricks man, always guna be people out there who don't care, even if it's a shit game /shrug
I remember when games released complete with 60 hour campaigns. Thanks pre-orders!
Ah so good to have been brought up in the 90s onwards.
i mean...they stil do, SMT V just released
Persona 5 or P5R if you want the directors cut
Yes, people couldn't download games, you could only play games with CD or DVD back then.
This meant that games had to be 100% complete, because there was a good chance that whatever released at launch, would never be updated.
Now with such a fast download speed and unlimited internet access, they started to abuse "update" excuse and release incomplete games to quickly cash out and abandon incomplete projects such as Anthem and other live service trash.
"It's just a beta guys, stop being so negative."
2016: why do people keep giving EA money.
2020: stop pre-ordering EA crap
2021: people are just dumb, aren't they..
Yep and they will keep defending the shit they pre ordered because they are unable to admit they are dumb = They are double dumb...
@@1Life2Little double dumb is quite honestly a dumb thing to say.
can't even blame EA anymore at this point. why bother putting in effort if people will still reward you with their money anyway.
I'd like to thank everyone who pre ordered this for giving me a good laugh this morning.
Lmao, they're probably still somehow justifying this. This has to be the worst battlefield game ever to release. to me the best ones were Bad Company 2, BF3 and BF1, those were some real good times.
@@wolfstorm5394 Good to know when people dont even know how Battlefield launches of the past have been :D. Talking without knowledge is always something i like. Just take a look at the horrendous launch of BF4 and to this day its one of the best BFs.
@@RoyDerDude oh it's one of the best you say? Too bad I didn't include it in my list, BF 2042 reminds me of BF4, and I didn't much fancy BF4
@@RoyDerDude Good to know when people don’t even read
A co worker of mine (cool guy and all) is shilling hard for 2042. I was pointing out all the problems and he just keeps defending the game saying its going to get better and that the changes are a good thing. I can tell he's in denial but he's such a hardcore Battlefield fan that he doesn't want to admit it sucks.
Remember the “Battlefield is going back to its roots”? What roots?? And the PP29 is the most op gun in the game.
I believe Pepperidge remembers.
Oh. So you bought the game then. Since you know whats broken.
You are the problem.
Lmao the only reason the PP-29 is op is because it’s the only gun that isn’t completely lackluster in performance, it feels like that because so many of the other guns are complete garbage.
@@pohja4552 you do know there’s a 10 hour trial right?
@@Yinzermakesvids nope i didnt. Had no interest in the game after the beta showed its going to be a pisshow.
The hover boat walk climbing absolutely needs to stay. It’s very battlefield-y and it’s not even OP. You’re a huge target while slowly climbing up the wall
"the beta is an old build guys"
It was. The game was still changed alot and so were the graphics.
I laughed at these fans then and I laugh now.
Yep I saw people saying that in comments of earlier videos. They didn't learn from other games.
This game feels like they ballooned the player count and map size with no research on what that would mean to match quality. I've never had such a frustrating and boring BF experience
Lol, the maps actually feel THAT empty?
To many player but I did find the map felt empty because everyone's at 1 point on the map.
@@TheBatman39 Super cap. People calling the map empty are people who def haven’t played BF before. BF always had big ass maps with little to no firefights in certain areas. They dead ass implemented the call in system to compensate for the even bigger maps and mfs still complain. Like bro….if you’re used to playing COD all day with in your face shit 24/7. then play COD
@@invitationonli I mean, El alemain from og 1942 is fucking huge.
@@ilikefud1984 Bro. that’s exactly what i’m saying BF always been big asf. people complain about maps being too huge like they want action in their face. You have breakthrough, TDM, Rush, etc. like wtf. there’s literally no reason to complain about spacious maps in a BATTLEFIELD game. I don’t get it bruh.
“We wanna go back to are Roots and do what we are good at ...multiplayer” - BF Devs....Yaaaaa surreeee ya do
Boots on the ground gameplay, or was that Call of Duty?
Well. Nowadays it appears that the lesson is : Never preorder, especially from the “AAA” companies.
That's been the rule for several years now. People just keep blindly pre-ordering games.
My internet can't support online play, so I had no reason to even buy it. Hopefully by the time I have a better internet service, this game will have improved some.
Another buggy mess? Man, those AAA companies really lost their marbles.
This is the point of all competitive games that have new releases. Make a new game with as little effort as possible, while trying to not anger the player base too much, profit. See you again in 3 years. Don't forget to buy DLCs in the meantime.
Why do i feel like if you put in all the effort in the universe that you could gather, to make a game, it would be probably on Roblox?
@@tenderonibaloney8854 Roblox literally has like every game U could think of
I figure these companies are just using early buyers as beta testers. They eventually fix it once the masses start reporting stuff like this.
There is a disturbing trend with these companies releasing broken games and assuming people are going to be OK to wait for the patches. The players who are loyal to these companies are the problem. It’s like buying a car missing a wheel and being told by the dealership that they will put it on in a few months. Parts of the motor are also missing and they tell you the same. Then imagine you are OK with that. Stop buying these games.
The hovercrafts have finally surpassed Skyrim's horses as the ultimate meme vehicles.
Memes are cancer. A testament to laziness and stupidity.
@@chillnagasden6190 says you
@@chillnagasden6190 - "I don't like fun"
@@KC-py5vq Yes, the ignorant and howling masses barfing out memes that were never funny to be original tend to outnumber the voice of reason.
@@rizaadon If you think being the exact same as 5 million idiots reposting the same thing that was never funny in the first place is "fun" then have your "fun", son. Some of us like to not drool when we breathe.
Just proves that pre-ordering is officially dead. No game is safe these days.
I mean you can say that but choosing an EA title to base that philosophy off of is like saying trash tastes bad lol
literally, not even rockstar after the triology, extremely sad
Devs dont care, scalpers grabbing premiums, gamers are gullible, video game industry is doomed eternally.
EA launched a game that's a broken, busted-ass mess.
I'm shocked.
Well not that shocked
remember in the 2010s when a game came out and just worked day 1?
uh, nope.
I have been playing video games since the mid 1980s, and I NEVER remember a game I played in the last 35 years that had zero bugs in it. not one. most did not have game breaking bugs you could not work around without a patch, but every single one had bugs. the vast majority a significant number of them.