It depends upon the rider I tried lowering my saddle according to trend and it halted the consistency in my power delivery , I could instantly feel it becoming easier to put down power after increasing my saddle height . So never follow trends do what’s best for you everyone is different
I did a bike fit to decrease the compression on my lower back, and the riding position is very similar. It depends of the rider, skills, objectives and so on. Everyone is different.
Im not a cyclist but if you are lower you have more power to turn your peddels around . The power comes from the upper legs .So yes more power . I think the old methods are wrong ( high saddles )because then the Power comes from the feed . The strongest part is your upper legs .
Yes, but his saddle is low because it was probably deemed the best height for him. I think that this was the team's (and pogi's) decision to run low. Maybe to give him more control over his pedal stroke.
@@theoquindipan7885Exactly. The most common reason for running a low saddle (or lower then what someone would guess by looking at a rider) is to improve control through the bottom of the pedal stroke
Chet Kyle, the aero guy behind the US pursuit bikes in the 84 and 88 Olympics, showed that this is not a problem. The was also a PhD. He didn't claim to know everything but loved to test everything and get repeatable results. He produced a series of science based magazines in the late 80's and early 90's called Cycling Science. It wasn't junk and nonsense filled with opinion. Strictly science based tests and articles solely based upon results. It yielded a nice community around the dawn of the internet and various University based networks that spawned more tests and an open platform. Finding copies is still possible and in the mid 90's they came out with a bound edition that had all the issues complied together.
That's the new trend and it's better. Got rid of a ton of pains and recurring injuries after getting the saddle down
You are so dumb...It is not lower. He has always had the knees a far bit forward, the modern style opposite to lance armstrong.
It depends upon the rider I tried lowering my saddle according to trend and it halted the consistency in my power delivery , I could instantly feel it becoming easier to put down power after increasing my saddle height . So never follow trends do what’s best for you everyone is different
И шатуны от детского велосипеда надо ставить можа 150 мм
Yes, many riders have the saddle low like that.
Greg Lemond had a formular where he was sitting very high.
It was low enough to won Giro.
Many pro riders prefer low saddles, for example the Yates brothers, Cavendish, jai hindley.. look at the angle of their feet
Looks like! But we shoul see the same images from the side not from bellow. What is typical of Pogui is having the saddle all the way forward
exactly...opposite to armstrong. Just watch armstrongs time trial.
Hes a pro..if his comfortable at that settings, let it be.😅
I did a bike fit to decrease the compression on my lower back, and the riding position is very similar. It depends of the rider, skills, objectives and so on. Everyone is different.
So lower saddle = lower compression of back?
@@zajrem9411 advanced saddle in relation to the pedals axel. Saddle height should be the one that fits your hips movement better.
Im not a cyclist but if you are lower you have more power to turn your peddels around . The power comes from the upper legs .So yes more power . I think the old methods are wrong ( high saddles )because then the Power comes from the feed . The strongest part is your upper legs .
К чему этот совет
Заткнись
It is comfier and more aero.
Нет, вам кажется. Ему поставили укороченные шатуны, поэтому он крутит с малой амплитудой. Все в порядке, у него за счёт этого увеличился КПД.
난 애초에 자가피팅했는데 하면 할수록 안장이 낮은게 장거리에서 최대 파워 유지하기가 좋았음
그란폰도 대회나가도
마지막까지 퍼지지않고 결승점까지 버틸수있는 셋팅
빵뎅이 포지션이 자유로운것도 한몫함
Allez pogi
Higher of saddle is normal.
He has just little cranks
Interesting, do you know what size cranks he has?
@@dschlag 170mm
It’s obvious..his knees are not going high so short cranks..bike fitting is madness so
Hard to find your perfect position
They’re 165mm cranks
@@maximebriand7468 they're using 165mm cranks nowadays
Chris Froomed is pretty low as well
look slow motion he is very high
He uses short crank arms.
No. It’s not low.
Pros can get away with a lot.
Yes, but his saddle is low because it was probably deemed the best height for him. I think that this was the team's (and pogi's) decision to run low. Maybe to give him more control over his pedal stroke.
@@theoquindipan7885Exactly. The most common reason for running a low saddle (or lower then what someone would guess by looking at a rider) is to improve control through the bottom of the pedal stroke
no the angle by the knee should be around 20-30 to be efficient it’s récent nowadays science
Uhm actually the angle should be around 40°, +/- 5. So a 136° knee angle is fine for example.
I think it works for him?
Idk hes not that fast
@@dschlag he's not that fast lmao
Maybe. But only won like 5 of the stages out of 20 in the Giro, so inconsistent.
I joke, I joke!
Guy is a beast. Amazing to watch when he goes hard.
165 cranks? And lower saddle possible
it is used for higher saddle position
how tall is Pogacar?
176
We have been fed lies
Cross chaining like a mofo
Chet Kyle, the aero guy behind the US pursuit bikes in the 84 and 88 Olympics, showed that this is not a problem. The was also a PhD. He didn't claim to know everything but loved to test everything and get repeatable results.
He produced a series of science based magazines in the late 80's and early 90's called Cycling Science. It wasn't junk and nonsense filled with opinion. Strictly science based tests and articles solely based upon results. It yielded a nice community around the dawn of the internet and various University based networks that spawned more tests and an open platform. Finding copies is still possible and in the mid 90's they came out with a bound edition that had all the issues complied together.
look slow motion he is very high