2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302 vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,8 тис.

  • @TheAventadorSV
    @TheAventadorSV 10 років тому +92

    What? an Evo without an massive wing on the rear end? what is this heresy??

    • @aquateen77723
      @aquateen77723 10 років тому +7

      ***** Yeah, for some reason the Evo MR has no wing but the lower tier GSR has the big wing.

    • @buckorooster
      @buckorooster 9 років тому +1

      TheAventadorSV NOOOOOOOOOO!

    • @stephenjames3844
      @stephenjames3844 5 років тому

      @@buckorooster Lols six years challenge.. Your right i say no to AventadorSV

    • @curtisjenkins9711
      @curtisjenkins9711 5 років тому

      @@stephenjames3844 Ford is a great product and also has the best stock strategy

    • @CoolGuy-op6gp
      @CoolGuy-op6gp 5 років тому

      @@curtisjenkins9711 yes Ford is a good product but stock Lols i don't think so.. Have lost enough money in stock investment.. That's a no for me 👌

  • @oldfashionedwrx3574
    @oldfashionedwrx3574 11 років тому +5

    the fact that it is only 1.54 second difference with a massive power:weight difference, both cars configured for track is impressive
    make the track a bit wet & more twisty favours the evo, more straights favours the boss. so you'd pick what you want
    I find the evolution quite impressive and the boss 302 is pretty cool fun car by the looks.
    cool video :)

  • @MERGATROYDER
    @MERGATROYDER 9 років тому +43

    So, you're telling me, two seconds behind with 150 less horsepower? Yeah, lets toss a better intake and exhaust on that Evo and still have more money in the bank with easily a win on that track.

    • @fatboy19831
      @fatboy19831 9 років тому +9

      +Levi Dunn If you tune it the brakes and turbos will heat up faster. The fastest lap will get closer. Every lap after that the Boss will pull away. The two cars are fairly close in price. At least when new. The Boss is worth much more than the EVO now.

    • @kssouf
      @kssouf 8 років тому +4

      +fatboy19831 It's not as easy as throwing an intake and an exhaust but if you get the right pads/rotor setup and leave the stock turbo and change some bits and pieces like the intake, hard piping and better intercooler a good tune and so on and so forth, the Evo will be faster every lap without any heating issues without a doubt.

    • @fatboy19831
      @fatboy19831 8 років тому +4

      Elie Kassouf I am not saying it is impossible...I have never ....ever seen an EVO that could last even 5 hot laps. I have seen V6 Camaros run all day. Same for 500 + hp Mustangs. Anything you can do to an EVO you can do MORE reliably with a Mustang. Look at formula drift they have 850 to 1000 hp Mustangs that can go the whole season on one engine. No Japanese car can do that. The big weak spot on the Mustangs is the brakes. Other than that they are very good high hp runners.

    • @mandoky1647
      @mandoky1647 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/BmY0Di7b0CY/v-deo.html

    • @mandoky1647
      @mandoky1647 5 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/UAVTiGib8ZE/v-deo.html

  • @AutoGuide
    @AutoGuide  11 років тому +28

    It's our most watched video ever! Watch it for the first time... or even watch it again!
    Ford Mustang Boss 302 vs Mitsubishi Evo.
    ***** *****
    #ford #fordmustang #mitsubishi #mitsubishievo #shootout #racetracks

    • @jeep661c
      @jeep661c 11 років тому

      why did he say 50% less hp ? the evo has 291 right ?x2 would be 582 hp not 444hp like the boss 50% of that is 222hp

    • @WilliamWatkins
      @WilliamWatkins 11 років тому +1

      Christian Ortiz Your getting literal...its a general statement they are not going to say 35.5% more HP than the other. Not a put down or trying to little it or make the Mustang seem like more than it is.

    • @mr.v7762
      @mr.v7762 11 років тому +8

      Christian Ortiz 50% is not x2. its 291 x 1.5=437

    • @alkoyyy
      @alkoyyy 11 років тому +5

      Anton V
      that's right if you say that the mustang has 50% more hp than the mitsubishi, but thats not what the guy in the video said.
      he said that the evo had 50% less hp than the mustang, so the starting point is the 444 hp of the mustang
      444 - 50%of444 = 444-222=222 which is a lot less than the evo actually has.
      btw.: not hating against the video, or anybody else, just wanted to clear that up

    • @jeep661c
      @jeep661c 11 років тому

      Oh sorry thats right 50% of the 444hp is 222 and the evo still has about 70hp more then that and 70 hp is alot to get . A and tunner and c.a.i is 30 hp .headers is like 15-20 hp and mufflers like 5 hp so after all that still only at 60 hp

  • @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52
    @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52 9 років тому +39

    As an owner of the same model Evo I can swallow the results and be very happy with that. I think some people forget that the Evo is great on all sorts of terrain. It's snowing where I live right now and I can take my car out and have fun with nearly no worries of getting into trouble. The Boss would be useless right now. Of course we all live in different climates, but for me I would hate to have a car sitting around for 6 months for nice weather to come.

    • @psyduckproductions607
      @psyduckproductions607 7 років тому

      RIP EVO its anoying though as the fq400 should have been compared not the mr

    • @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52
      @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52 7 років тому

      PsyDuck Productions I'm curious to hear why you feel the FQ 400 would have been a more fair comparison?

    • @psyduckproductions607
      @psyduckproductions607 7 років тому

      RIP EVO boss302 alot of horses best model of this mustang fq400 alot of horses 75 less but the best model of the evo10 there are even similarly priced american muscle will always be a aluminium block with a v8 fart generator

    • @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52
      @Eagles.Fan.Since.Super.Bowl.52 7 років тому

      Similarly priced? The Boss 302 and Evo X MR are $40,000 cars. The X FQ400 is $80,000. You could literally buy both the X MR and Boss 302 for the same price as the X FQ400.

    • @trey1215
      @trey1215 4 роки тому

      @@psyduckproductions607 by the way the best model of the mustang of that year was a gt500. 662 hp.

  • @Vision33r
    @Vision33r 8 років тому +54

    444HP vs 300HP and the Evo was less than a sec behind the Boss. If that EVO was the FQ400, bye bye big fat BOSS.

    • @tommy657100
      @tommy657100 8 років тому +7

      +Vision33r not even lol, an fq360 is enough to beat it

    • @TheBb6prelude
      @TheBb6prelude 8 років тому +2

      can't forget the weight,keep the same power to weight ratio on both and test them after.

    • @Debbiebaxter51
      @Debbiebaxter51 8 років тому +1

      +Vision33r yeah and out comes the 450kw raptor

    • @ilike2watch66
      @ilike2watch66 8 років тому +1

      Or just a $400 professional tune. And done..

    • @nickvacirtzoglou4559
      @nickvacirtzoglou4559 8 років тому +6

      put them on a real course like mosport gp and see what happens, that boss will walk all over that evo. Less powerful and lighter cars have a way bigger advantage on Cayuga. The course can make or brake lap times for certain cars. The Evo is an excellent car with incredible performance, potential and value.

  • @danieldesjardins4074
    @danieldesjardins4074 10 років тому +15

    3 laps, each way under a second for a combined time of 1.54 seconds. The $38,000 evo is like a second and a half behind $42,000 mustang. for $4,000 you can gain way more than a second and half in aftermarket upgrades.

    • @TassieLorenzo
      @TassieLorenzo 9 років тому +4

      +Daniel Desjardins A (good) normally aspirated V8 is more fun than turbos though, shrug. :)

    • @savagepebbles1694
      @savagepebbles1694 7 років тому +1

      TassieLorenzo nope

    • @cvzanikos1
      @cvzanikos1 3 роки тому +1

      @@TassieLorenzo People who don't think so can't drive.

  • @hartsickdisciple
    @hartsickdisciple 11 років тому +30

    All the butthurt and ignorance on here is hilarious. How could anybody who really knows anything about cars be questioning this outcome? Were you not paying attention when Ford stated that their goal for the Boss 302 was to beat the E92 M3 around Laguna Seca? Did you not notice when it actually happened, and all the outrage from the BMW fanboys? This is a serious car. 0-60 in 4.0 seconds, 1/4 mile in 12.3 seconds, 0.96G on the skidpad. No disrespect to the Evo, but it was out of it's league here. I'd be interested to see an FQ400 do a lap with a professional driver, and then have the same guy do it with the Boss 302. I bet it would be damn close. The edge might go to the FQ400 there. The days of American pony/muscle cars sucking around corners are over. They have been over for a few years.

    • @Ointless
      @Ointless 10 років тому +5

      Yeah, I would love to see an FQ400 vs the Boss 302. I think the Evo would pull ahead in that matchup.

    • @guyproulx1660
      @guyproulx1660 10 років тому

      i say your the ignorant one, mustang needs twice the engine size and only won by 1.4 seconds lol, if i was ford i'd be embarassed lol, half the power and almost the same weight, i wonder who has the best performance for the engine size, put a v8 in that evo and we'll see who wins, evo would do 2 laps for every lap the mustang would do lol

    • @Craiggg12345
      @Craiggg12345 10 років тому

      guy proulx Evo has all wheel drive. That is one of the reason it can keep up. Pretty obvious.

    • @guyproulx1660
      @guyproulx1660 10 років тому

      Jeremy Jones imagine half the engine size and it has to power all 4 wheels

    • @234toxicmist
      @234toxicmist 10 років тому

      guy proulx, 1.4 seconds is a lot of time on the track. It'd be one thing if it was a couple of tenths, but 1.4 seconds is a lot. Face it the boss is faster, way faster. It's faster around the track and the strip. The Evo also has all wheel drive which is a pretty nice advantage on a track, and it still lost.

  • @Contempt805
    @Contempt805 10 років тому +108

    I'm so bias I didn't even watch the video, seen the Evo X and was like "yup it's better" end. Haha

    • @KOJI85442290
      @KOJI85442290 7 років тому +2

      Joseph Larios don't know if you got around to watching the vid in the last two years but the evo kinda lost....ouch

    • @jdm-cars8044
      @jdm-cars8044 7 років тому +2

      KOJI BF1 FnnY gAmEplaY aNd cAr REvIeWS DuMb It lost because they used the least powerful Fq-300 version

    • @KOJI85442290
      @KOJI85442290 7 років тому +2

      JDM VR4 both the cars were in the same price range at the time the fq you would want them to test would be quite more expensive so...........

    • @jdm-cars8044
      @jdm-cars8044 7 років тому

      KOJI BF1 FnnY gAmEplaY aNd cAr REvIeWS DuMb True, but all I was saying is that they used the least powerful version. Anyway, Most american muscle cars are very cheap compared to their European counterparts.

    • @KOJI85442290
      @KOJI85442290 7 років тому +1

      JDM VR4 we are not comparing European and American cars we are comparing two similar priced cars one is a bare bone v8 pony cars using its suspension work, high revving V8, 6 speed manual, and sticky tires and the other is a light sedan with awd, paddle shifts, 300hp going to all wheels, and quick acceleration with electronic turbo

  • @lazarnedeljkovic5615
    @lazarnedeljkovic5615 9 років тому +48

    The Evo is a beautiful car with the wing. But without is ugly af

    • @joseraulcali
      @joseraulcali 8 років тому

      do u even know what spoilers do to ur car

    • @lazarnedeljkovic5615
      @lazarnedeljkovic5615 8 років тому +2

      +Reck tha dab Gamer give you downloaded and add some drag. But I'm talking about the looks here

    • @joseraulcali
      @joseraulcali 8 років тому

      Lazar Nedeljkovic yeah you're right

    • @lazarnedeljkovic5615
      @lazarnedeljkovic5615 8 років тому +2

      +Lazar Nedeljkovic fucking autocorect, i meant downforce

    • @dariodelgado9444
      @dariodelgado9444 5 років тому +1

      Go take your pills

  • @suicidallooneypro
    @suicidallooneypro 10 років тому +51

    From the moment i saw the mustang gets a powerslide entrance i knew this video was some biased shit for the mustang. they probably warmed up the tyres on the mustang doing power slides then took the evo out on cold brakes tyres and engine seeing how biased this is. Anyways the mustang should be faster look at the huge difference in power, it's just embarrassing the mustang is 1.5 second faster and these guys are proud of it. Not gonna go into modified cars vs stock cars but if the evo had the power the mustang did and the mustang had the power the evo did, the time difference would be HUGE and the mustang cost over 4k more that's alot of money in difference.

    • @chilled913
      @chilled913 10 років тому

      That's not a big difference for what you get.

    • @heyitschinoable
      @heyitschinoable 10 років тому

      243kingfrank True.

    • @AQCE245
      @AQCE245 10 років тому +3

      heyitschinoable I hate to see a Great car go i hope Mitsubishi brings it back somewere down the road.

    • @il-conte
      @il-conte 10 років тому +1

      Yes. You can see that just by looking at the lateral g's recorded... the evo less than the mustang? LOOOOL not in this world

    • @AQCE245
      @AQCE245 10 років тому

      U_Wot_m7+1 Nah The Evolution is better car then the Mustang. I mean Rustang

  • @keniacastro7962
    @keniacastro7962 3 роки тому +2

    THE MUSTANG IS AHHH PERFECTION, THE TWO WERE GOOD, I LOVE IT ON VIDEO

  • @locketom
    @locketom 10 років тому +105

    This test is already invalid because there are two different drivers in this... Let's be real here, on a circuit with the same unbiased driver, the Evo would beat the mustang every time.

    • @AutoGuide
      @AutoGuide  10 років тому +57

      Ricky Lahey The lap times for both cars were actually recorded by Dave Pratte. He does the official lap times for all of our track tests.

    • @guyproulx1660
      @guyproulx1660 10 років тому

      no doubt

    • @ZepG
      @ZepG 10 років тому +43

      Nice try Ricky, now go back in your parents basement and play with your matchbox cars,

    • @amrelsoo6830
      @amrelsoo6830 10 років тому

      Agree

    • @sergsrt8
      @sergsrt8 10 років тому +6

      go back to watching the fast and the furious

  • @SloansDroneZone
    @SloansDroneZone 10 років тому +32

    Keep in mind it took a 444 hp V8 to just barely beat out Mitsubishi's 4-cylinder turbo. Twice the cylinders, twice the horsepower, but just a second faster on a 1:20 course? That's a stock Evo too. Let's see how this race goes with a properly tuned Evo.

    • @05gtdriver
      @05gtdriver 10 років тому +9

      But it took the EVO AWD and DCT to allow it to corner with any semblance of handling ability. If the EVO was just FWD and turned a lap 1.54 seconds slower than the Boss, I'd concede an EVO victory, but each car needs it's advantages to make the most of what it's capable of in stock form.
      An AWD Boss 302 would probably run 4+ seconds faster than the stock EVO and a 444hp EVO would do the same to a stock RWD Boss 302, so it's a fair comparison stock vs stock IMO......

    • @lukethekanefan
      @lukethekanefan 10 років тому

      this years anniversary edition Mitsubishi evo brand new from show room 440 bhp now that would kick ass

    • @BoxeoChingon
      @BoxeoChingon 10 років тому +3

      05gtdriver well said.... most people dont know shit about cars..
      people think that just because the evo has less power and can almost do the same as a boss is better. .
      guess what in a hot summer day turbos suck. evos are to make you feel twice the driver than you really are. mustang are for true drivers.

    • @05gtdriver
      @05gtdriver 10 років тому

      ***** Gosh, such an extended explanation for something you're so convinced about. 1st off, reading comprehension is duly necessary to understand my post. Going by your EXTREMELY long winded post, so the EVO could take out a Boss 302 without being what it is?? I never said the EVO was modified in any way, share or form. If you could not sound like an irate parent and slowly reread my post, there's just a simple statement about each car's methods are what allow them to do the numbers they do. No fantasy cars(again, reading comprehension) were seriously considered, just making a theoretical example.
      No one is challenging your manhood, no one is saying your preferences are unworthy.
      Your extremely long post is disturbing.......

    • @Bxalbo7182
      @Bxalbo7182 10 років тому

      Either way evo is better, I don't understand the point of comparing a 444 hp car to a 291, let's compare this mustang too a gtr and see who will win

  • @fikes73
    @fikes73 11 років тому +23

    I hate hillbillys who dismiss the evo as "ricer." You know nothing. The car is one of the fastest cars under 40 grand. I am no fanboy, I would take the boss. But I respect the Evo. The new 2015 Mustang is amazing, cant wait to see reviews on that

    • @katanaben1
      @katanaben1 11 років тому

      I hate the fact that they use a 4 cyl ecotec turbo. What are they thinking? Going green now?
      And all those round shapes and bubbly corners make the 2015 resemble a Genesis coupe. They destroyed the masculinity of the car.

    • @SFBay69
      @SFBay69 11 років тому +2

      The 2015 mustang looks like riced out pos.

    • @Texarmageddon
      @Texarmageddon 10 років тому +1

      Thats cause the evo is a ricer

    • @NurulHidayah-bq3jm
      @NurulHidayah-bq3jm 10 років тому

      TheSoulEater121

    • @TaufikAkbar7
      @TaufikAkbar7 10 років тому

      katanaben1
      most japan and euro cars follow the euro emission rule so they did that power trimming,

  • @Tropicsca
    @Tropicsca 10 років тому +80

    They purposely chose the mustang 302 boss because none of the regular mustangs could beat an evo. The mitsubishi evo MR isnt even their top model, the fq400 is. Which could smoke the boss 302. And probably the shelby 500 too. Seeming as the fq400 only lost by seconds to a nissan GTR that had 600 hp.

    • @baigadil
      @baigadil 10 років тому +7

      what "purposely"????, look i am not a big fan of american muscle, love them, they are fun, but end of the day not my genre i would say. having said that isn't the whole point of comparison begin at a price point? didnt he said boss take away was 42K, and MR was still 38K. so thats a justified compare point within 5k range

    • @nickmotsarsky4382
      @nickmotsarsky4382 10 років тому +4

      First of all, losing by "seconds" is an eternity. Second, the evo is lighter than the gtr. Third, gtr has 545hp unless it's a Nismo. Evo is too ugly and too fat for its size.

    • @AugustFourSeven
      @AugustFourSeven 9 років тому +6

      It looks like they chose the 302 because it's basically the same price. A GT is 1/2 to 1/3 the price of that Evo. How would that comparison make any sense?

    • @JMLueckeA7X
      @JMLueckeA7X 9 років тому +6

      The fq400, which was a highly limited model that cost 82 thousand US dollars and wasn't even available in the US. You could buy a Z28, the ultimate track muscle car as of yet, which would not only beat the fq, but would save you money.

    • @buckorooster
      @buckorooster 9 років тому +2

      Nick Motsarsky Wow the Evo is heavy. Shame on Mitsubishi for not keeping the Evos at as lean 2600-2800lbs.

  • @jerseyman1O
    @jerseyman1O 10 років тому +15

    Should've done the Boss 302 vs the Evo FQ400. That'd be great to see.

    • @jonathanbachman2339
      @jonathanbachman2339 5 років тому

      The Man with No Name Already compared. The Germans did it at Hockenhiem small track. This Boss Mustang, M3 Track Ed., FQ400, Audi R8, Nissan GTR etc. the Boss was quicker around Hockenhiem the the FQ400. And the M3 Track Edition. I know many Domestic magazines do not like American cars. The Germans do not care were the car is made. In fact the Mustang put sells all M models combined in Germany. Maybe the Ford is not so bad?

  • @JTNaise
    @JTNaise 9 років тому +34

    Evo still wins my heart.

    • @christineayres5339
      @christineayres5339 4 роки тому

      I lmao when i saw an MX5 right behind the Mustang, it is just too heavy and poor in corners compared to JDM cars

  • @mrcyberfix
    @mrcyberfix 11 років тому +14

    Thumps Up for Mitsubishi Lancer Evo. just a 4 cylinder car with 2 liter engine competing with Mustang Boss 302... 8 cylinder car. WOW no wonder Evo is most poplar car on grey market before. love the sun roof :) in EVO

    • @SiCxNeMeSiS
      @SiCxNeMeSiS 5 років тому +1

      A boosted (turbo) 4 cylinder dont forget because its nothing without that boost

    • @avixs1543
      @avixs1543 3 роки тому

      @@SiCxNeMeSiS 4bangers can still make 210+ HP if you push it which is damn good for the amount of cylinders and displacement of only 2L

  • @TonyAvalosGTA
    @TonyAvalosGTA 9 років тому +9

    Would take the Boss 302 in a heartbeat

  • @predatorshelby5780
    @predatorshelby5780 10 років тому +2

    I traded my 2008 M3 (which is a V8) for a 2012 mustang 5.0 and performance wise theyre almost identical. So all you EVO fan boys who wish you could afford an M3 (and dont lie, you do) do some research or find a 5.0 to test drive. And dont even use that "with a few bolt-ons" excuse cause the same can be said for the mustang.

  • @Rangerfull3
    @Rangerfull3 10 років тому +4

    Import fanboys are the worst losers. "Lets see this go against my friend's 1k hp supra!" or "Wow they let it win because it's American" or even "That's not fair, the mustang has way more horsepower(even though they're essentially the same price)".

  • @alexf6198
    @alexf6198 7 років тому +36

    How many crowds did the mustang hit

    • @depresso9775
      @depresso9775 7 років тому +2

      Miami of Miami how many haters do you have?

  • @BlakBraces
    @BlakBraces 9 років тому +2

    Sure, the Mustang has 400+ hp and has a V8... But the fact that the EVO has not even half of the motor and has half the horsepower but was only 1 second behind says a lot js.

  • @EcclecticNerd
    @EcclecticNerd 10 років тому +6

    I like both of these cars, but I wouldn't say it's exactly a fair comparison. The Boss is basically a high-performance version of the mustang. There are plenty of EVO versions overseas that put out almost as much power as the Boss. The takeaway is: A high-performance Mustang is only slightly faster than a factory delivered Evo.

    • @aerologiesgb1223
      @aerologiesgb1223 10 років тому

      Exactly

    • @EcclecticNerd
      @EcclecticNerd 10 років тому

      *****
      Indeed, just reading the announcement that the X would be the last Evo was a sad day. Hopefully, they can at least go out with a bang with the Evo X Concept Final.

    • @EcclecticNerd
      @EcclecticNerd 10 років тому

      I'd imagine Japan, the UK and maybe some part of Europe?

  • @nicoray15
    @nicoray15 11 років тому +3

    A used 2006 evo IX still cost from 20k$ to 30k$ and used stang is like 7k. So witch hold its value better again?

    • @Spiritcr1jsher
      @Spiritcr1jsher 4 роки тому +1

      Care to go over those numbers 6 years later ? Used Mitsubishi is about 15k and the boss is still worth $30k...lol

    • @nicoray15
      @nicoray15 4 роки тому

      @@Spiritcr1jsher just checked CarGurus and a low-mileage mint evo still goes for 35k.... Now over a hundred thousand miles tho 17K sounds about right

    • @Spiritcr1jsher
      @Spiritcr1jsher 4 роки тому

      @@nicoray15 i agree . A mint boss 302 is still going for almost list and they still make Mustangs.

  • @catfish1966
    @catfish1966 10 років тому +2

    Do you know that people make money from posting videos like this on UA-cam? The more views the more they get... and also from the commercial running at the beginning and from the number of views. The view counter keeps climbing each time you come back.

  • @ubercooper
    @ubercooper 8 років тому +4

    Driven both of these on long trips... Evo is a better track weapon but the Mustang is a more comfortable cruiser, plus the V8 sounds phenomenal

  • @AllThingsSuperMoto
    @AllThingsSuperMoto 10 років тому +3

    What are some other cars like the Evo? I know some of the cars that compete with it such as the ford focus st and subaru wrx sti or the golf gti. what else is there?

    • @afghanastan100
      @afghanastan100 10 років тому +1

      You've got the three you mentioned (ST, STI, and GTI). Then you also have the Golf R, Focus RS, Mini Cooper S JCW edition, Audi A1 Quattro, Fiesta ST, Seat Leon Cupra, RenaultSport Clio and Megane, Citroen DS3, and Peugeot 208....to name a few. Of course, most of those are hot hatches.

    • @juderocks5
      @juderocks5 10 років тому +1

      Nickolas Little That is assuming he doesn't live in north america. Sadly we don't get most of those cars. We don't get the forcus RS yet, nor any Citroen, or Renault, Peugot, or Seat. Aslo, we just got the golf R this year I believe, we also don't have the audi A1 yet. BUT at least we have all of the MINI models.

    • @afghanastan100
      @afghanastan100 10 років тому

      juderocks5 Yeah I live in NA too....there's way too many hot hatches/compacts that we don't get. But I'm pretty pumped about the RS coming here. Lol I'm not personally a fan of the MINI but the JCW edition isn't too bad....if you're into that sort of thing

    • @juderocks5
      @juderocks5 10 років тому +1

      I'm very excited about the rs happening, and it would be even better if they offered it in all wheel drive. I'm not a very big fan of the MINI myself but my girlfriend is and it's a huge step above the last car she drove so i'm fine with it. Personally I drive an EVO 8. My last sports car before this was a modified 2011 mustang GT, but when I drove the EVO I knew it would destroy the mustang anywhere but a drag strip so I just had to have it.

    • @afghanastan100
      @afghanastan100 10 років тому +1

      juderocks5 Good news! The RS is AWD, so I'm pretty stoked since my Focus is FWD. Yeah my GF is driving a Gran Prix....she has 0 interest in cars. Man it's a bummer about the EVO, I was always partial to them. Yeah that's the thing, I love Mustangs they're the reason I'm so into cars now but they aren't the best around the track unless you drop money on a 302 or Laguna Seca or hold out for the new Shelby.

  • @WildTheLuckyOne
    @WildTheLuckyOne 9 років тому +2

    Oh come on, really? You have compared 291 and 444? don't be stupid. My friend has Mitsubishi Evolution with 720 hp and THIS IS NOT A LIMIT, so this Mustang will nervesly smoke in the corner.
    Dislike. Compare equal cars, without such difference in HP.

  • @bcs528
    @bcs528 11 років тому +7

    Pretty embarrassing that with 153 extra horses the Mustang is only 1 second quicker. Impressive for the Evo.

    • @airsoft197
      @airsoft197 11 років тому

      awd and dual clutch, vs rwd and manual. Nothing impressive about it. Obviously if you think Horsepower is the only thing that makes cars have faster track times you are uneducated about cars. It's made for the track, it has brembos, & eibach springs as well. Its an even match.

    • @MustangDarkHorse
      @MustangDarkHorse 11 років тому

      The Boss Mustang beats the "EVO" by 10 seconds at Virginia International Raceway's 4.1 mile Road Course, and that's per lap.

    • @FordGTmustang2000
      @FordGTmustang2000 11 років тому

      no whats embarrassing is the evo owner has to go around saying he got beat by a rwd mustang in its own game... go the the 1/4 track and the evo gets beats worse

    • @strifu808
      @strifu808 11 років тому

      some kids.

  • @B_M_F_710
    @B_M_F_710 10 років тому +3

    Ha Body roll like a boss! Cheap like a boss! Solid rear axle like a Boss! Leaf springs like a boss!

  • @MoreGrievances
    @MoreGrievances 11 років тому +1

    At the end was a failed attempt to do a doughnut around the EVO like in the ZR1 vs GTR vid.

  • @davidusminimus
    @davidusminimus 10 років тому +11

    Wow with 150 more horsepower the boss only wins by 1 second lmao what a joke

    • @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp
      @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp 10 років тому +2

      At VIR the Boss beats it by 10s

    • @davidusminimus
      @davidusminimus 10 років тому +6

      No just no

    • @Rangerfull3
      @Rangerfull3 10 років тому +4

      A second is a huge amount of time on a track. The difference between a Camaro SS 1le and a FERRARI 458 ITALIA on a track (willow springs I believe, it's on motortrend) is UNDER A SECOND.
      1.5 seconds is a huge split, and you not knowing this shows how qualified you are to be knocking on the Boss

    • @thingsdemystified
      @thingsdemystified 10 років тому +2

      davidusminimus The design goal of the Mustang was to beat an E92 M3 around Laguna Seca. It did. This Evo had no chance.

    • @Tropicsca
      @Tropicsca 10 років тому

      thats why they upgraded the mustang to a boss 302 instead of the GT because the ford had to have at least some chance of winning.

  • @krocialblack
    @krocialblack 11 років тому +16

    All of you Import vs Muscle losers are just sad. *BOTH* of these machines are awesome, affordable and *FAST!* I don't give a rats ass who built these cars! I also don't care where they come from! America, Japan, Europe Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea. *HELL!* These cars can come from *Mars* for all I give a shit! If it's fast and looks good? It's getting my respect!
    *DONE!*

    • @AndreLeandro139
      @AndreLeandro139 11 років тому +1

      Turtle Pops
      Is tehre any thing more ricer than a bugati veyron? The guys weld togeter a VW v8 lol... Is there anything just more ricer than that? Cmon...

    • @strifu808
      @strifu808 11 років тому

      lol!

  • @m7md4x4
    @m7md4x4 6 років тому

    This test was made to support USA economy. No way in sector 3 specially the mustang beats evo

  • @daveprobert2168
    @daveprobert2168 10 років тому +7

    I'm assuming that they r using low quality fuel for this comparo? I dunno, just doesnt seem right that the Mustang is quicker around a track.

    • @234toxicmist
      @234toxicmist 10 років тому +2

      This is a track car. A real track car. It makes twice as much power and weighs about the same as the Evo. Ford specifically tuned the car for track use

    • @mohamad-abdo
      @mohamad-abdo 10 років тому

      Matt Colegrove nope the car is not made for tracks
      something is really wrong with this comparison
      even in need for speed the evo out performs the boss 302 in every aspect .. the 302's acceleration, top speed and control are all close to zero

    • @jaredchong4070
      @jaredchong4070 10 років тому

      mohamd khaled Dude stop comparing things in games , its not real
      but.That much amount of weight that car couldnt beat a lighter oponent like a GT86 or 370z

    • @Rangerfull3
      @Rangerfull3 10 років тому

      mohamd khaled LMAO. Need for speed. Truly shows that most import fans are children, keep playing your videogames

    • @mohamad-abdo
      @mohamad-abdo 10 років тому

      Brad Miller first of all the comment is several months old now and second i'm not even a gamer.. however car games nowadays try to make driving as realistic as possible i know this doesn't apply on NFS but in NFS the car specs are realistic for example the Bugatti is the fastest car in the world so it has the highest top speed in the game .. the evo is oneof the best handling cars so it is the most controllable car in the game .

  • @845ToastT
    @845ToastT 10 років тому +3

    Mustang for the race track, Evo for mountain hairpins, bumpy roads, off road, and winter weather. Done.

  • @bobjefferson1332
    @bobjefferson1332 9 років тому +2

    If Evo motors are so great, how come people don't swap then into anything such as 2jz's , ls motors, 5.0 and Rb

    • @TheZoonder
      @TheZoonder 9 років тому

      Bob jefferson Only murricans swap motors (or in 95%). Other people usually buy a good car with a good engine in it...

    • @bobjefferson1332
      @bobjefferson1332 9 років тому

      TheZoonder because there motors are usually better... ls motors are the best motors u can get and its great.

  • @Tool0GT92
    @Tool0GT92 9 років тому +2

    Both are great cars, but you would look cooler driving around in an EVO.

    • @ODST172
      @ODST172 9 років тому

      +Tool0GT92 please explain how the fuck youd look cooler in an evo than a mustang. please.

    • @Tool0GT92
      @Tool0GT92 9 років тому

      +ODST172 When I drive around I see about 100 mustang GTs to 1 EVO, its a less common car, which I think makes it much cooler. Plus, I owned a lancer and it was an amazing car.

    • @BrickMuffin
      @BrickMuffin 9 років тому

      +Tool0GT92 I live in an area riddled with evos. My 5.0 is the rare one out here.

    • @ThePINOYZONE
      @ThePINOYZONE 9 років тому

      Mustang is fucking ugly lmao. Its for fucking old retarted people

    • @sasouns
      @sasouns 9 років тому

      ok

  • @TheChipiboy
    @TheChipiboy 10 років тому +6

    I really dont get why everyone is so surprised and gloating about the mustang. Ford purposely built the Boss as a track car. It beat a car that is great at everything all around and does what it did in the track in the dirt too. As an all around car i would definitely go with the EVO without a doubt just more of a do anything kind of car.

    • @CreedK
      @CreedK 9 років тому

      ***** Of course it is. I don't think that people even realize that basically all Muscle cars have the sole purpose of looking cool and being more fun to drive than almost any other car. They honestly were never intended as track cars or family cars, the invention of the pony car changed that a bit and allowed them to be used in those ways (to some extent).

  • @gentlemonsterkennels
    @gentlemonsterkennels 11 років тому +1

    I love my 2012 5.0! I got it for 25k brand new... But I would prefer the evo all day. Driving in the rain w my stand is no fun. I want AWD. Dual clutch tranny is also better. And the room!! I hate putting people in the back seat of my stang. It's for lil kids. If only I could get a new evo for 25k! Lol

  • @Logicsupremacy
    @Logicsupremacy 8 років тому +30

    Are you kidding me? EVO all day everyday

    • @quintfl
      @quintfl 8 років тому +5

      8>4

    • @random8780
      @random8780 8 років тому +3

      +Gary W-l-o-t I4+turbo>NA V8

    • @quintfl
      @quintfl 8 років тому +1

      Rorru Ropelius nah

    • @BigBossIvan
      @BigBossIvan 8 років тому

      That's all according to the "plan". In 2013 the Mustang broke it by adding excellent handling to a muscle car... And when something doesn't go according to plan, well, everyone loses their minds...

  • @MrSlofreak
    @MrSlofreak 11 років тому +4

    evo with 291hp vs a 444hp mustang and the difference is less than 2 sec? I say tune up that evo to 444hp and try that agean :P

    • @boro92
      @boro92 11 років тому

      To be fair, Autoguide went to Cayuga. It's a track that notoriously suits smaller, low power cars. Local time attacks have s2ks and miatas winning the events if it gives you an idea of just how tight the circuit is. It's really more of a motorcycle track than a car track. The time difference at a real circuit (say, Mosport) would be much larger.

    • @leskraszczynski3044
      @leskraszczynski3044 11 років тому

      Because stock vs modded totally makes sense here...

    • @boro92
      @boro92 11 років тому +2

      Leszek K. FWIW the evo is much less of a true drivers car.
      If one wants to get out there and enjoy the rewarding thrill of actually manipulating the chassis (rather than have a car make all the correctiosn for you), then the Boss is your car (for this comparison). It's sharper, more direct on corner entry and you can't deny that v8 sound!!!

    • @mrcyberfix
      @mrcyberfix 11 років тому

      I didn't know that these people are so poor in math.
      it is been said that Mitsubishi Lancer Evo is a lab for Drivers.

  • @tdwan100
    @tdwan100 11 років тому +2

    you sound like a honda driver with that mentality. evo8/9/10 with boltons netting around 340whp at like 24psi, thats not impressing anyone. dont make your 300whp fwd platform talon sound like its not a pile.

    • @louievazquez5231
      @louievazquez5231 8 років тому

      tdwan100 i heard if you take off the bumper, hondas get an extra 30 horsepowers 😂 vtec baby

  • @likenem
    @likenem 9 років тому +15

    Will Import, Muscle Fans, and Euro Fans ever get along.

    • @noahread1062
      @noahread1062 9 років тому

      Just no

    • @MrGTR1988
      @MrGTR1988 9 років тому

      likenem no way

    • @nathanms99
      @nathanms99 9 років тому +1

      Sadly no, because dumbasses are so biased towards different cars and dont respect the capablities of other cars

    • @rooftopshootaz8927
      @rooftopshootaz8927 9 років тому

      Imports are best!!!! Lol jk

    • @123habbovids
      @123habbovids 9 років тому

      +Andrew L I'm pretty sure you are thinking of the camero not the Mustang

  • @jdmcommute
    @jdmcommute 10 років тому +3

    Evo's are de tuned from the factory. 9 out of 10 Evo owners ditch the POS exhaust system and move up to a 3" exhaust and a ECU flash tune. Most after the tune will make 350-400 whp depending on the quality of the parts. You can do the same to a Boss 302 but the gains wont be that much. Depending on the track design (i:e more corners less straights) the stage 1 tuned Evo will win by a small margin but in stock form its close. Im not a big fan of Evo's but I like them. Im a subaru guy. But unfortunately the mustang will come and go in a year but the value of Evo's and STi's will stay.

    • @avixs1543
      @avixs1543 3 роки тому

      Ooh a Subaru guy aye? Always love the rivalry between the Lancers and WRXs, actually is was because of that rivalry that I love both cars soo much, but I'm more a Evo guy idk I just love evos

  • @dtxdemonsa.tx.6238
    @dtxdemonsa.tx.6238 11 років тому +2

    we just got the 2014 evo mr and i just love the power and how it handles

  • @numinous4789
    @numinous4789 9 років тому +4

    There's more than one way to skin a cat. The Mustang and the Evo take two totally different approaches toward the same goal: going fast. While the Mustang had faster track times in this comparison, I'd totally take the Evo. Its approach to making power is preferable to me. Also, you can make a ton more power very easily/cheaply with an Evo, something that tends to be much more true for turbo cars than N/A ones.
    In fact, if you just took the difference in price between the two cars in this comparison (which is $4,305) and dropped it into the Evo to make it the same cost as the Mustang, the Evo would've annihilated that Boss in every way... Seriously...

    • @Kevinb1821
      @Kevinb1821 9 років тому +1

      Zack Richmond a 2014 mustang gt with the track pack will still beat that evo and cost less than the evo

    • @Kevinb1821
      @Kevinb1821 9 років тому

      Kevinb1821 www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?zip=33543&endYear=2014&modelCode1=MUST&showcaseOwnerId=459509&startYear=2014&makeCode1=FORD&searchRadius=200&showcaseListingId=396970149&mmt=%5BFORD%5BMUST%5BMUST%257CGT%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&listingId=398012253&Log=0 try 8 grand less

    • @numinous4789
      @numinous4789 9 років тому +5

      Kevinb1821 Perhaps. But maybe not. I'd still take the Evo.

    • @DCGarage
      @DCGarage 9 років тому

      +Zack Richmond Buy a base Mustang GT with the track pack and bolt on a supercharger or turbo for 5 grand. You can make 650 whp reliably with the 5.0, while the Evo will not be as reliable and being an Evo X, does not have the cheap power potential of the earlier 4G63 powered cars.

    • @numinous4789
      @numinous4789 9 років тому

      MAEguy That's a good option, I suppose. Bye, bye warranty though. But I guess that's a moot point with most mods.
      For me, the truth is that Mustangs feel like boats. I much prefer the high-tech import feel associated with many of the Japanese cars. I, for instance, have a Mazdaspeed 3 and I love its driving dynamics. The proof really is in the pudding, though, and the fact is that Speeds are very competitive in auto-x.

  • @PradigyMusicman
    @PradigyMusicman 10 років тому +4

    Until you drive a Manual V8 sports car with a nice exhaust you just won't get why someone would want it over a WRX STI or EVO. It just sounds and feels like awesomeness

  • @AutoGuide
    @AutoGuide  11 років тому

    You are correct. David Pratte put down both official lap times.

  • @LBCvalenz562
    @LBCvalenz562 11 років тому +3

    LMAO the big sounds like the guy from Eastbound and Down ahhaha

    • @dannykartes4938
      @dannykartes4938 11 років тому +1

      "Kenny its your friend Stevey"

    • @Zenfyr
      @Zenfyr 11 років тому +2

      nice, I thought the same thing as soon as I heard his voice.

    • @dannykartes4938
      @dannykartes4938 11 років тому

      Zenfyr
      Mouth Breathers

  • @danielOconahap
    @danielOconahap 10 років тому +31

    evo is a rally car. put that mustang on the rally course then

    • @jmm09015
      @jmm09015 10 років тому +6

      haha yea i no. The evo comes stock rally ready. That mustang would legit fall apart on a dirt course. This video makes no sense. Comparing a rally built racer to a 440 hp muscle car is like racing a dirtbike against a cbr 1000 on asphalt

    • @Crazyjazy2012
      @Crazyjazy2012 10 років тому +1

      and then lets see who wins (evo of course) :D

    • @leviathan0232
      @leviathan0232 10 років тому +1

      look at it like this though, the mustang is better in a straight line and the evo is better off road, so your saying put the stang on a rally course? ok put that evo on a quarter mile as well. neither of these cars are best suited for track racing. they are both out of their element in this video.

    • @jmm09015
      @jmm09015 10 років тому +1

      the point im trying to make is that this comparison is pointless. dumb fucking video.

    • @mcmadson
      @mcmadson 10 років тому +4

      The Evo owner is butt hurt.

  • @fade2k8
    @fade2k8 10 років тому +2

    Lol. They compare the Evo's paddle shifters to ones on a Porsche. Why not compare anything on the mustang to a super car? Oh yeah, because its nowhere near one. Evo wins in my book

  • @sanadaHIRO
    @sanadaHIRO 11 років тому +3

    this such bs comparison they should compare it with a stage 3 turbo evo now let see whos faster

    • @shayanmalik7152
      @shayanmalik7152 8 років тому +1

      Billy Leung Slap a turbo on the Boss then let's see who's faster? Or maybe a fast shifting auto in the Boss? Or how about lets fabricate an AWD drivetrain for Boss? Stop coming up with excuses, It can go both ways.

    • @caveman3251
      @caveman3251 8 років тому

      Billy Leung lol it need a turbo to win

  • @mcoop6620
    @mcoop6620 9 років тому +5

    From the side, the Evo looks like a woman's tennis shoe.

    • @mcoop6620
      @mcoop6620 9 років тому +1

      But on that note, it's still a great car.

    • @gonspartan1544
      @gonspartan1544 9 років тому +1

      +M Coop but musteng look like box shose..

    • @mcoop6620
      @mcoop6620 9 років тому

      GON SPARTAN
      Haha yeah I guess I can see that too now that you mention it.

  • @Kak007
    @Kak007 11 років тому +2

    Whats the difference with the evo uro edition he says... search you tube mitsubishi evo vs lambo and watch what a refined factory evo can do. I believe top gear does this review. Mustang does have boss horse power over the evo that is slow as shit lol. I guess evo handles a tiny bit better. I wonder what last generation mustang could do against last generation evo. Hint solid rear truck axel.

    • @MrCpe9775
      @MrCpe9775 11 років тому

      well they're not talking about last gen. and the evo in production form. Like other guy said bump the evo to 444hp. Well then the Evo becomes a60k car and gets on the turf of the 662hp GT500. the compare is fair and if you like small turbo cars that's your fault but don't whine wen your team loses.

    • @leskraszczynski3044
      @leskraszczynski3044 11 років тому

      Hint: stangs that are about to show up in dealerships in a few months have independent rear suspension.

  • @dripgod5129
    @dripgod5129 8 років тому +3

    That's probably the American downgraded evo x mr with 291 horsepower BRING that shit to Europe face our FQ 400 real evo c

  • @averynicefella
    @averynicefella 11 років тому +4

    Such a shame for Mustang! 2.5 times bigger engine and only 80lb-ft more torque... Weird comparison... Won't be surprised if you'll do a comparison between a bicycle and Mustang and Mustang will win... lol

    • @DanielBlaney
      @DanielBlaney 11 років тому

      You should probably read up on how a turbocharger works.

    • @matthewd6306
      @matthewd6306 11 років тому

      Strap a turbo on the boss 302 engine, and it will put down over 600hp. Displacement is not everything. Its how much air you can pump into those cylinders.

    • @303creesh
      @303creesh 11 років тому

      have fun paying 60 grand for a factory boosted mustang. my evo x at 35 grand would kill if you gave me 15 Grand to play with. hell even 10 grand

    • @matthewd6306
      @matthewd6306 11 років тому

      M Mccreesh Or throw a 3.4l Whipple on my cobra and I'll be pushing 650+ to the wheels. Your ricer wouldn't have a chance.

    • @jeep661c
      @jeep661c 11 років тому

      ahhaha wow guess you don't know cars at all

  • @scottandroni365
    @scottandroni365 10 років тому +1

    I love my BOSS 302, and I love having a little fun through friendly competition. I just hate when some of these guys take it way too seriously. 😆

    • @avixs1543
      @avixs1543 3 роки тому

      I know aye, I have mad respect for both of these cars, I love me some American muscle and some JDM speed demons

  • @ThePINOYZONE
    @ThePINOYZONE 9 років тому +7

    Lmao, 150+ more horsepower and $5,000 more than the Evolution for a 1 Second more for overall lap. Gtfo Mustang fanboys..

    • @Anthonyrs2
      @Anthonyrs2 8 років тому

      you boutta cry bb?

    • @TheBb6prelude
      @TheBb6prelude 8 років тому +1

      can't forget how much faster it is on the drag strip.

    • @ThePINOYZONE
      @ThePINOYZONE 8 років тому +2

      +f2b.....f20bEG Lmao, i dont wanna race in straight line wtf.

    • @relaxingearthviews446
      @relaxingearthviews446 8 років тому

      whatever race it is when it comes down to the pink slip those 5k will come in handy then i will have both cars😂

    • @aero0637
      @aero0637 8 років тому

      +NRosanes So you'd still lose then.

  • @alexshi8583
    @alexshi8583 9 років тому +2

    JDM is better than some shitty american muscle. Just because you have more hp doesn't mean shit.

    • @fatboy19831
      @fatboy19831 9 років тому +3

      +Alex Shi Means your car is faster in every way.

    • @alexshi8583
      @alexshi8583 9 років тому

      fatboy19831 the whole point of an import is to get it tuned so a ford mustang vs a stock import is stupid.

    • @fatboy19831
      @fatboy19831 9 років тому

      Alex Shi Folks don't tune Mustangs?

    • @alexshi8583
      @alexshi8583 9 років тому

      fatboy19831 they do but they don't get the dame effect.

    • @alexshi8583
      @alexshi8583 9 років тому

      fatboy19831 ok obviously they are gonna want to tune ANY car wut i meant was plus upgrades like dual turbo

  • @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp
    @Shelby-Ecoboost-Raptor-550hp 11 років тому +1

    2015 Ford Mustang
    In terms of performance, the Mustang GT will still offer the 5.0-liter V8, and the article reads that the 2015 GT with the Performance package will actually be faster on the track than the Boss 302. Some other interesting tidbits about the new Mustang are the standard push-button starter, the availability of adaptive cruise control, an independent rear suspension, a 200-pound weight reduction (that at least somewhat will be afforded by using aluminum front fenders) and a wheelbase that measures the same 107.1 inches as the current design.

  • @iFacTzZ
    @iFacTzZ 10 років тому +4

    Evo isn't made for track, it's a rally car. Unfair comparison!

  • @freddydakine5806
    @freddydakine5806 11 років тому +4

    Mustang may have muscle but it has no brains whatsoever. A 444 of wasted horsepower. Leave the brains to the Japanese...

  • @bazking2033
    @bazking2033 11 років тому

    what fuel were they both running? The evo is tuned to run on 98 octane

  • @gmoney5802
    @gmoney5802 11 років тому +11

    5.0L v8 vs 2.0L I-4
    ...
    ...
    Seems fair.

  • @iRoach94
    @iRoach94 11 років тому +9

    I hope this video makes all you Evo lovers realize how much Mitsubishi is off their game. I probably shouldn't even say off their game because they won't ever be cool (fast) again it's obvious. While American cars have made huge engine advancements, imports such as Subaru and Mitsubishi haven't done a good thing since their first models hit the market in 2003 (the ones we fell in love with so fast).

    • @TheHavoc013
      @TheHavoc013 11 років тому +2

      I will say you just one thing... imagine Evo with 5.0 l engine. That's all!

    • @iRoach94
      @iRoach94 11 років тому

      well write to Mitsubishi and tell them about this car we would all buy.

    • @quintonvongpanya5669
      @quintonvongpanya5669 11 років тому +1

      I love the Evo, but I would have to agree with you on this. Mitsubishi and Subaru seem to be playing it a tad bit safe these past few years and I have to hand it to Ford for the improvements they've made to the Mustang. I would still personally pick an Evo over a Mustang, because I'm biased, but I wouldn't mind letting that V8 roar!

    • @iRoach94
      @iRoach94 11 років тому +1

      you could spend 5k and it still wouldn't beat the stang, let that sink in :(

    • @quintonvongpanya5669
      @quintonvongpanya5669 11 років тому +1

      I can care less about beating anyone. I just love the Evo, plan and simple. I don't care about who is faster than who lol.

  • @mbenzsl2000
    @mbenzsl2000 11 років тому +1

    The new Boss (2012) is by far the best stang in a LONG time.

  • @thee90kid
    @thee90kid 8 років тому +13

    Compares EVO to Porsche 911 lol wtf

  • @kalvinruiz54
    @kalvinruiz54 9 років тому +2

    mitsubishi evo is the beast

  • @jbonet4750
    @jbonet4750 3 роки тому

    Did you use the Track key ind set up in this comparison?

  • @ilikerealflight
    @ilikerealflight 11 років тому +12

    ok, now take them off road

    • @jeep661c
      @jeep661c 10 років тому +2

      ford has more wrc wins

    • @ilikerealflight
      @ilikerealflight 10 років тому +1

      Christian Ortiz in a mustang boss 302?

  • @Built2Fast
    @Built2Fast 11 років тому +3

    LOL.. I'd pick the EVO.. But, who gets an EVO so they can keep it at stock performance anyway? Rice over Beef in my opinion!

    • @strifu808
      @strifu808 11 років тому

      i'd eat both for dinner, sounds tasty. but yeah, i agree XD

  • @bmgcomp
    @bmgcomp 11 років тому +2

    isn't an insult to Mustang 5.0 v8 that you compare it with Evo 2.0 turbo... really?

  • @spencerperry99
    @spencerperry99 10 років тому +4

    I own a Mitsubishi and the EVO would kill that mustang in a race

  • @Gebruikersnaam10011
    @Gebruikersnaam10011 9 років тому +3

    Only in 'Murica... Never seen such a bad comparison :')

    • @TassieLorenzo
      @TassieLorenzo 9 років тому

      +Gebruikersnaam10011 They are Canadian...

    • @Gebruikersnaam10011
      @Gebruikersnaam10011 9 років тому

      +TassieLorenzo which is on the continent of...?

    • @TassieLorenzo
      @TassieLorenzo 9 років тому

      Gebruikersnaam10011 Hahahaha, good point :)

    • @gentlemonsterkennels
      @gentlemonsterkennels 9 років тому

      What's wrong with the comparison?

    • @Gebruikersnaam10011
      @Gebruikersnaam10011 9 років тому

      +gentlemonsterkennels maybe that the engine in the Ford has twice as many cylinders and 2,5 times as big? Besides that, the evolution can handle much more g's in the corner than the way-too-heavy ford. It's just that the driver is a total wimp. American cars just miss the finesse and precision of non-American cars. The Ford uses more than twice the mpg? But who cares, God bless ignorant 'Murica.

  • @capivarafalante2600
    @capivarafalante2600 11 років тому +2

    BOSS, BOSS, BOSS!!! pure American power!!! And also gorgeous!!!

  • @poliklolik
    @poliklolik 9 років тому +4

    Freaking Evo any given day!

  • @ethanbudzilek1495
    @ethanbudzilek1495 9 років тому +4

    So you're telling me different drivers, and the fuckin automatic transmission on the Evo? Haha come one. The Evo BONE STOCK can be tuned to well over 330 hp AT THE WHEELS and already crush that stang. There's so much wrong with this comparison I don't even want to get myself any more angry than watching this already has. Hahaa

  • @AC-lq4zw
    @AC-lq4zw 10 років тому +2

    its funny to see how many hypothetican and opinionated excuses there are for the mitsu. "immagine if the evo had a 5.0"!... well it doesnt and if it did they would probably be charging 60 grand or something crazy. "the mustang loses value faster"! i didnt know this was about selling our used cars, i thought it was about speed. also the boss 302 holds value because its a special edition mustang. go look and see how expensive an old boss 302 is. people later down the road will buy it just for the boss trim.
    the worrst part? the new 2015 mustang stock GT (without the track pack) is faster around the track than the last 302 so immagine how badly the GT with the track pack will spank the evo.

    • @JavTheRipper
      @JavTheRipper 10 років тому

      They are comparing cars from 2013 though, so your 2015 argument would be irrelevant in this case. Technology gets better as the years go by.

    • @AC-lq4zw
      @AC-lq4zw 10 років тому

      the 2015 mustang is in production and models have been released early at auction so it isnt hypothetical. production models of the car are obtainable and they will be at dealerships globally in a month or 2

    • @AC-lq4zw
      @AC-lq4zw 9 років тому

      +Jav The Ripper well any car can spank the 2016 evo if you catch my drift. also the 15 stangs are spanking the evos lap times. my hypothesis turned out to be correct.

  • @MidniteClimax
    @MidniteClimax 10 років тому +3

    whitesnake and a mullet? I thought he was driving a mustang, not a camaro!

    • @Dogboy1960
      @Dogboy1960 10 років тому

      There is a difference? Hey, in the 1980s Camaros, Mustangs and Corvettes were EVERYWHERE and crazy popular with the mullet crowd. If not so much a rap on these cars as it is the lack of excitement about other cars at the time.

    • @MidniteClimax
      @MidniteClimax 10 років тому +1

      Except the guys today that drive camaros still look like they're out of the 80's lol

    • @Dogboy1960
      @Dogboy1960 10 років тому

      David Slaymaker Maybe. Last guy I saw that really looked the part was actually in a Corvette......but that's another story. Next year changes everything for the Mustang but as it stands today, right now, with it's "live" axl. the Mustang is the car most connected to it's 1980s heritage.

    • @SFBay69
      @SFBay69 10 років тому

      Dogboy1960 not really..the 2014 mustang is still a badass looking car and is fast as shit for the money

  • @onixxx1984
    @onixxx1984 11 років тому +3

    Just put some boltons on that evo and say bye bye to the boss.

    • @hartsickdisciple
      @hartsickdisciple 11 років тому +2

      It might surprise you to know that the 5.0 responds very well to bolt-ons too. There are quite a few Mustang GTs and Bosses out there with bolt-ons and a tune making over 440whp.

    • @onixxx1984
      @onixxx1984 11 років тому +4

      hartsickdisciple Generally all evos on simple boltons like tb exhaust, intake, intercooler piping, get above 300 whp, like 340-350 whp, but even if you count that extra 100 to the mustang, rear wheel drive would be harder to push around on the track, and the evo is forgiving and easy to drive fast, I mean I feel very safe in my evo, but I don`t really feel safe in a rear wheel drive car going fast in the corner and the rear end breaking scares me.

    • @dannyarriaga1
      @dannyarriaga1 10 років тому +6

      Nagy Szilard that would be because it requires skill to drive a high HP RWD car around a track........you feel safe because the computer is driving for you.....skill> computer

    • @MRSlimes-sq5rp
      @MRSlimes-sq5rp 10 років тому

      shatup

    • @Imbwest
      @Imbwest 10 років тому

      put some bolt ons on the mustang as well and evo will be right in its place. the dealership

  • @thespectralsorrows
    @thespectralsorrows 11 років тому +1

    2 awesome cars, hard choice between the 2, but for a few G's more I'd buy the Boss 302.

  • @EnricoPallazzo83
    @EnricoPallazzo83 11 років тому +3

    Buahhhahahha Mustang beats Evo.. LOL... In what world!!???? Planet USA?? Do you people realize that We can watch this video in Europe too?? In the next Mustang advert try to make some effort and don't compare it to the slowest Evo....

    • @snakecold6755
      @snakecold6755 11 років тому

      All car same. Do not worst. All cars good.

    • @hartsickdisciple
      @hartsickdisciple 11 років тому

      Boss 302 dumbass. It beats the E92 M3 around Laguna Seca. Become educated and leave your old biases behind. Then go drive one. You will understand.

    • @EnricoPallazzo83
      @EnricoPallazzo83 10 років тому

      hartsickdisciple E92 M3 is not that hard to beat.. Evo FQ-400 would beat it too.. you read between the lines.. My point was they took the slowest Evo you dumbass..

    • @hartsickdisciple
      @hartsickdisciple 10 років тому

      Haszyk Recordings They used the Evo that's available to purchase in the US. Dumbass yourself.

  • @mykelboy7764
    @mykelboy7764 9 років тому +3

    Haha.. Why is that ur comparing a tuner car to a muscle car?..

  • @entropy156
    @entropy156 11 років тому

    Apparently, second place in a two car competition is what it takes to be a legend these days...

  • @rickysanowara8254
    @rickysanowara8254 10 років тому +11

    Look.. Americans can't take corners.. And they talk about "handling"

  • @leeeeeeeeeee012
    @leeeeeeeeeee012 11 років тому +6

    Sometimes I Envy America, their car is just fucking cheap. Only $43k and you get Mustang? Here in SEA you will only get the very basic Corolla. I will be fucking rich if I live in America :(

    • @hartsickdisciple
      @hartsickdisciple 11 років тому +2

      You can get a nicely-equipped Mustang GT with over 420hp for under $35k.

  • @sorooshusa
    @sorooshusa 11 років тому

    I dont understand your question. but if youre asking if Evo can do 200 mph the answer is obviously no. Its a 4 cylinder 2.0L engine. its not meant to go 200 mph

  • @djmay9859
    @djmay9859 11 років тому +3

    lol the mustang cant run rings around the evo even though it does

  • @shiygirl16
    @shiygirl16 10 років тому +4

    its a 4 cylinder 2liter with 150 less ponies yet is almost running identical times...evo wins period.

  • @TakinArrowsToTheKnee
    @TakinArrowsToTheKnee 9 років тому

    Summary:
    The EVO's AWD system really is amazing! It just makes this car a superb tool for dancing around the track. The second you get on the power, it just rockets you on the other side with tons of grip.
    The uhh.. The Boss 302 also comes with adjustable dampers. 4:55

  • @2wheels4wheels
    @2wheels4wheels 11 років тому +3

    Like another video that shows z06 faster than Nissan gtr....WAKE UP AMERICANS,,,haha

    • @MrBF3alltheway
      @MrBF3alltheway 11 років тому

      You should research more on the corvette and the gtr on the track and come back and look at that sentence.

  • @shaochiavang
    @shaochiavang 11 років тому +3

    FQ400.

  • @chucka187
    @chucka187 11 років тому +2

    Both are great cars. If the evo have had the same output in power as the mustang, I'm sure the mustang would have been embarrassed.

  • @FreeeeBeer
    @FreeeeBeer 11 років тому +58

    The Mustang holds its value better than the EVO,
    The Musang,is better looking than the EVO
    The Mustang performs better on the road course and drag strip than the EVO.
    The Mustang smashes the Camaro also.
    The Mustang owns all in its class.

    • @alanraya8165
      @alanraya8165 11 років тому +24

      I think that the EVO has better value than the mustang, I think that the EVO it's better looking than the mustang, the EVO looks more agressive and faster, the mustang performs better than the EVO? Yes, maybe, but remember, the one in this comparison is the Mustang BOSS 302, not just a GT, and the EVO is just the MR, not the GSR (faster than the MR) not mentioning the FQ400 this one is as fast (or even faster) as the Shelby GT500. ;)

    • @hartsickdisciple
      @hartsickdisciple 11 років тому +4

      Alan Raya An FQ400 can't come close to hanging with a GT500 in a straight line, assuming the Mustang gets a good launch. Around this tight track... maybe. I think the Boss 302 might be faster than the GT500 around this type of course.

    • @dassboy90
      @dassboy90 11 років тому +26

      How does it hold value better?
      2008 Mustang GT Premium = $27k w/15k miles
      2008 Evo MR = $36k w/42k miles
      Cars.com

    • @alanraya8165
      @alanraya8165 10 років тому

      hartsickdisciple I think an FQ400 vs a GT500 would be a great race, they have similar 1/4 mile times and speeds, maybe the Evo has a little advantage because the all wheel drive, but the Shelby it's so fast too and I have to admit that in a larger race the GT500 wins, and are you serious? I don't know that about the 302 and the GT500, the GT500 it's sooooo fast, so if that's the case, the 302 it's fast and surely it has an awesome handling, sorry if my english it's not so good, I'm not from an english-speaking country, I'm from Mexico :P, but well I think that both are awesome cars in the track. Greetings ;)

    • @Landslide2024
      @Landslide2024 10 років тому

      Volvo's, Evo's, what the hell is the difference, they both like like a Lego car. Yes I said that a box on wheels.

  • @ndk5907
    @ndk5907 10 років тому +4

    What if the mitsubishi was v8 ?
    Lol

    • @guyproulx1660
      @guyproulx1660 10 років тому +2

      well now that wouldn't be fair now would it lol, i love it when american muscle car fanboys argue about mustangs and camaros, one says camaro is junk, the other says mustangs is junk, i'm guessing they're all junk lol, am i right?

    • @johnfrancisespiritu533
      @johnfrancisespiritu533 10 років тому

      it's faster than r35 now
      cause gtr has v6

    • @philipjohn1338
      @philipjohn1338 10 років тому

      Evo is supercharged, so the comparison was fair enough.

    • @ndk5907
      @ndk5907 9 років тому

      EVO is turbocharged dumbass

  • @shells1990r
    @shells1990r 9 років тому +2

    $38,000 vs $43,000. 5000$ for 1 second of time? I can put 5000 to tune the turbo and shave of 5 seconds

    • @TheGorgeramirez
      @TheGorgeramirez 7 років тому

      shells1990r evo is a piece of shit lmaoo my friends has broken down 4 times last lololol

  • @AngeloR674
    @AngeloR674 10 років тому +19

    the eve is so much nicer then the UGLY MUSTANG! EVO IS ALL QUALITY!

    • @thehacker660
      @thehacker660 10 років тому +22

      Since when is Mitsubishi known for a quality? It has the same cheap interior as the base Lancer. You have no idea what you're talking about.

    • @MrTmenzo
      @MrTmenzo 10 років тому +2

      Ryan Mc lol for reals

    • @marcellowheeler88
      @marcellowheeler88 10 років тому +7

      Quality? Its a beast of a performance car but you went full potato saying its all quality. A 2000 civic SI has a better interior lol.

    • @PrinceDavid
      @PrinceDavid 10 років тому +6

      Evo is nice but Ford is known for better quality than Mitsubishi, just saying.

    • @lbart2005
      @lbart2005 10 років тому

      Marcello Wheeler I definitely agree with you!!!