My Other Channels: ua-cam.com/channels/I06Kdk5Gp67dsgrdbh8lLA.html ua-cam.com/channels/yJaQIf2CnXT0jELkPeO4CQ.html No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
He is Aussie open GOAT, at French open he is pretty much nobody, there is another GOAT there and always has been. Federer is the GOAT @ Wimbledon, narrowly though. As dominant as Nadal has been @RG , nobody can match that
It's honestly astounding how much the commentators drool over Federer. Even at the end of the first set, the commentator said that Federer dropped the first set, instead of Djokovic wins the first set. As if the only reason Djokovic secured it is because Federer's mistakes, not because he earned it. I know it's speculative but it's not a huge reach if you just listen to them throughout the video. It's not exclusive to this match either, you can tell the commentators always want Federer to win.
Those were different times. Federer was the one to beat at that time. Djokovic played great, but at the time the defensive style of play wasn't appreciated that much. People were still looking at Federer's mistakes, which is completely normal.
From what I can tell from the highlights, Federers ballstriking is as good as ever - on all fronts. Really good enough to win a slam in most cases. Djokovic simply was next level here. Incredible! You can see why he has the number of AO wins that he does.
Djokovic was the better player and he was always going to win this one. For me though its the mental failings that stand out yet again. Federer was playing well. 5-2 second set, to a 5-7 set score is so poor. Especially when you consider Nole had one slam at this point. It had already began post the 2010 US semi prior. Mentally, Federer just did not have the same strength. Time and time again, against Nadal and Djokovic, he lost slams he should have won. Not disputing that he should have lost this match. But he should never have lost it in straight sets. Watch 21.08 seconds his facial expression looks rattled. After he shanks the first point in the air for 0-15. Hes serving for the set. A chain reaction occurs, he starts to fall apart mentally. Happened way too often.
@@ben86jones82 I have a strong feeling that Fed was in denial that he was developing a mental block against Novak, and that it was costing him slams. Arrogance? stubbornness? call it what you wanna call it. Bottom line is he did nothing to address it early on (because he doesn't acknowledge that there's a problem in the first place). Hiring a sports psychologist would've been beneficial. Such a shame because he DOES have the game to beat Djokovic, it's upstairs where it always falls apart.
@@ahmedbebars6844 I may agree partially to this with you, but I would also say the opposite, Djokovic also had the game to beat Federer. He figured him out. It was not easy, cost him many losses, but he finally figured Federer out. In other words, I do agree Federer may have won more matches against Djoko if he toughened up his mentality, but Djoko would have also found a way to beat him anyways. Djoko is the very best in adaptability.
i feel another reason was that Federer never considered Djokovic to be talented as nadal and himself and i thought he felt like he was the more skilful player but still ended up losing most of their h2h, which definitely impacted him mentally.
2011 Federer faced djokovic in semifinals in Australian open, Roland garros and us open, Federer won in Roland garros, djokovic in Australian and us open !
Novak is the greatest, even if Fed or Rafa is your goat you have to admit and acknowledge that Novak is the statistical goat as well as being arguably the greatest athlete ever having the most mental resilience.
@@justchillin6314 we don’t have to admit anything! Even if your goat is djoker 2006 is the best season ever for a tennis player Federer won 92 and just lost 5 matches won 12 titles 3 grand slams number 1, something that djokovic could not do even in his prime or best season.
@@pirate8731 Yes you do lol or you are in denial. Novak literally owns all the records, has every record over Fed. Novak spanked peak Fed in the 08 AO lol and that was pre-prime Novak. You are delusional, Novak’s 2 best seasons are better than Fed’s 06 season lol. Fed had a weak era and zero competition besides Rafa on clay and still fell short to Novak’s 2011 and 2015 season. Novak literally won more titles and peaked with a higher elo rating than Fed did during Novak’s best season, and yet Novak faced much better competition and did it during the hardest era of tennis so you are talking absolute nonsense, everything you have just said is straight up lies you plumb. Pathetic. Goatovic has literally debunked every fed fan boy argument and proved that Novak is far far greater than Fedal. Cope harder!
He was caught off guard by Djokovic's level early in 2011, and he wasn't at his best until the French Open. He definitely played his best and the French and USO. Djokovic had to play probably one of the best matches ever to win their USO match. Regardless, this is peak Djokovic and not peak Federer.
@@spiritlance364 This is not peak Federer, but it is prime Federer at 29 years of age. Just because he lost, doesn’t mean he wasn’t at his best. Sure, he wasn’t at his “absolute” best, but I don’t agree that it took him that many tournaments (and losses) against Novak to be at his best at the French. Then again, when Federer loses, he’s not at his best. Federer was at his best in Dubai and Indian wells as he didn’t drop a set until facing Novak.
@@tolendoi123 Federer doesn't need to be at his best to not drop sets against most players, especially back then. Just look at his level of play in this match, Indian Wells and Dubai compared to the French and US. He was a step slower earlier in the year and slicing too many backhands. The backhand didn't penetrate or spread the court at all in this match and also the Indian Wells match. He played at a much higher level in the next two grand slam matches. That was Federer's best level at the time. He was past his peak and still matched peak Djokovic shot for shot at the French and US. He arguably played better in both but lost one.
Its a bit debatable if he was prime in 2011 because altough he had his moments I just felt was vulnerable to upsets as his consistency declined and overall his performance did It is for sure that federer's prime ended in AO 2010 after than a lot of bad losses and early upsets were clearly showing federer was playing his worst tennis since winning sw19 2003 , I felt he got rejuvented after his horrible wimbledon when he hired paul annacone I felt the end of the season was good primish federer level ,going into 2011 I felt he was good the ics are I felt he had a pretty bad clay season before the epic french open form (epic form that I dont believe equals his 2007 or 2006 clay form ) and that match where he really played bad vs Tsonga in wimbledon, you know what I am okay considering 2011 and 2012 his prime because although I believe his level was clearly higher from TMC03 to TMC07 I felt he showed the same inconsistency problems in 08 and 10 and even 09 to an extent but in 09 I felt his peak level was clearly higher than the other years like 08,2010,2011,2012 . Prime federer is something like from wimbledon 2003 to wimbledon 2012 , for nadal I think its from 2005 to 2014 and for nole from 2011 to 2023 ? Lol he seems so focused and dedicated that I dont see much decline in his game like I ve seen for fedal I cant call a guy who is going for calendar slam out of prime , the thing is I really believe even tho injuries happen and ect ect what makes djokovic the goat is that he is more dedicated just more willing to stick to that diet recovery ,to meditate, to live and breathe tennis thats why we are witnessing the slowest decline ever because this guy has pushed the dedication and mental to new levels never seen before , I did never a player who still believed in victory while down 2 consecutive championship points on the serve of one the greatest serveurs of all time
The point at 30-40 in the first game itself highlights that Federer has strategy issues against Djokovic. He hit a wonderful return but Djokovic's defensive shot was deep but then Federer just kept defending, asking the question if Djokovic could hit a winner. In the end, Djokovic went for it and won. The Strategy that Federer uses against Djokovic in tie-breakers and the important points is to usually wait for an opening or a miss from Djokovic But Djokovic rarely misses on big points. He missed 2 shots against Alcaraz and lost. If he would have missed it at Wimbledon 2019, he would have lost too. But as it happens rarely, players should not rely on Djokovic to miss. Federer should just have gone for his shots and trusted his aggressive play which he usually did during the match but not on big points.
exactly, as well balanced as djokovic is, he is ultimately a defensive oriented player, and thus aggressiong or takign the point to him is the way to defeat him
To play with a one handed backhand against Djokovic is simply very difficult. Hes playing with so much intensity, so good in the defense and most time gets the mistake from Roger. But this was the first match wich Novak played so well against Roger. He took a big step in early 2011 and maybe Roger was a little surprised because he beat him the last three matches. It´s clear now that the 2009 US Open gave Novak a lot of confidence for this victory.
Thank you so much for the highlights!! Great quality, but in order to get the 50fps from an interlaced video, you should use enconde it to progressive with handbrake using yadiff + bob
It's unbelievable what a big step Novak made at the beginning of 2011. He was like another, better player who suddenly played almost without unforced errors. The only thing that's annoying is that he screams so loud during the match. At all the match was very close but Novak played the big points very well/better. And maybe Federer didn't serve as well as usual.
When I watched 2011ao, I saw this less power and speed Federer could resist every set until the end, which made me more convinced that the 07ao Federer over any version ao Djokovic.
@@BardhanProductions Its a figure of speech but the court was high bouncing and slow. That was nadals best shot to beat Djoker at AO outside of potential 2013 and 14
that didn't age well, how did he go against a 20 year old who was only on grass for the 2nd or 3rd time in his pro career? meanwhile 38 year old Roger casually outplayed 32 year old Novax in 2019. Please.
I'd argue Novak has not been in his prime since 2016, maybe 2017... but much like Lebron James who is well past his prime, a Novak past his prime was (and still is) better than virtually every other player alive. even a Federer that was WAAAAY past his prime in 2018/2019 was still making grand slam finals because he was still better than 95+% of the men's draw aged 38 years old!
@@steinanderson maybe because that 20 years old is one of the most complete player the sport has ever seen at this age. If you want to find some arguments why roger is better than novak then try something else because your comparison doesn't make any sense.
how many slams would fed win if he had a double handed backhand? I dont understand the single handed backhand. It looks inferior as a technique to double handed backhand.
Wtf is going on with Federer's backhand, literally a massive weakness lol idk how he managed to get to semis convincingly this tournament, maybe cos of his other strokes too good
Yeah that backhand was terrible man, way to many miss hits. Fortunately Fed fixed this when he played against Novak again at RG the same year. That was arguably Fed’s best performance on clay ever though, but its Fed’s inconsistencies in the crucial moments that always let him down against Novak as if he’s been effected by Novak psychologically because of how mentally resilient Novak is.
Although the match is old, I would like to comment here on the aggression adopted by Western newspapers against the Serbian Hurricane and even some of the referees and the public, but Novak destroyed all the hopes of the organizers in most of the tournaments, who dreamed of Novak losing and applied pressure and racism against him, and let us not forget his exclusion from the United States Championship under the pretext of hitting the ball on the ground. One of the line referees or one of the football collectors, and certainly Novak does not mean that, and do not forget his exclusion from the Australian Championship under the pretext of not being vaccinated with the Corona vaccine. Also, the Americans excluded him for the same reason and all this racism so that Novak’s name is not recorded in history as the player who has won the most Grand Slam and Masters tournaments, but the Serbian Falcon disappointed their hopes and achieved What Federer and Nadal did not achieve, as Djokovic is the only player in history who won more matches than Federer and Nadal... currently the number is 24, and I hope that next year he will achieve all the Grand Slam tournaments. We love you, Janovac
Not true. You can see that during the set Federer was aggressive and Novak had trouble dealing with Fed's forehand. However in the tie breaks and other important points Fed got conservative, thinking eventually Novak would slip, which he never did. Over the years this got in Fed's head and he just couldn't deal with it. If Fed had just figured it out he would be the all time leader in SLAMS. Instead it's Novak.
What Federer needed to improve was his serve. He needed Pete for that job. With Pete's like serve he would have become nearly unbeatable. Apart from this Joker is simply the best in Australia. Nadal, obviously in Paris. But Federer could have dominated Wimbledon and US Open on a higher level and thus the GOAT question. He just took wrong decisions. And he was less lucky than Joker and Nadal. He lost matches that were on his racquet.
He was playing with a knee injury was he not? Something that started in 2010…Against the advice of his support team … refused to stay back , I heard, in a recent video , from a team member who decided to put it in the public domain now . Fed furnace them from publicizing this then . That’s who he is. He played because he just wanted to . He was totally out of his element.
Laughable how FED fans pull out the past his prime card........so fed was past his prime in 2011? how about 2007 when Nole started beating him/😁😆🤣😂😅😂explain to me how Nole at 36 can still compete and beat many of the much younger players......
Nah he definitely was in his prime in 2011 but still Novak was starting to become this beast that we've now known.Even though Rog got to number at 36 and a half he was still not as fit as Novak,so who Novak how longer Novak will stay up there?
Fed’s prime ended after winning Wimbledon in 2012. Novak was just an absolute beast in 2011 which is why I consider it the most goat year ever in tennis despite Novak winning more in 2015 and finishing with more ranking points, the competition in 2011 was harder than it was in 2015 so what Novak did in 2011 beats what Novak did in 2015, and what Fed did in 2006 for me.
Just because of one tight win, which Djokovic came very close to winning in straight sets. Djokovic demolished Carlos in French Open, but Carlos barely won Wimbledon. So, learn to talk sense, not what media tells you gullible mass.
@@AlanGoswami-nz9lg While I disagree with the OC, Djokovic didn't demolish Alcaraz in RG. They were completely even until he got cramps, a problem he solved for their next match which took place in an environment that completely favored Djokovic. Alcaraz still leads the H2H.
Novak has entered his thirty-seventh year, and we wish him health and wellness and to continue entertaining us with this fine art. Carlos is 20 years old, and the difference is approximately 17 years. I noticed that our Serbian Falcon defeated Carlos in Cincinnati and reached number 24 in the Grand Slam.. Djokovic recorded his shining name in the history book, and do not forget. Age has its rules, and yet the Serbian hurricane will remain a source of concern for all tennis players, despite the large age difference.
What a stupid comment to make. Criticising a player like Roger Federer, who won 20 Slams, more than everyone who ever played tennis bar just two, is idiotic, that's the only word for it.
My Other Channels:
ua-cam.com/channels/I06Kdk5Gp67dsgrdbh8lLA.html
ua-cam.com/channels/yJaQIf2CnXT0jELkPeO4CQ.html
No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
The GOAT was born.
He is Aussie open GOAT, at French open he is pretty much nobody, there is another GOAT there and always has been. Federer is the GOAT @ Wimbledon, narrowly though.
As dominant as Nadal has been @RG , nobody can match that
@@erkkikvell3659 Finally someone who makes sense.
@@erkkikvell3659 3rd best RG player = pretty much nobody.
Commentators were glazing like crazy
It's honestly astounding how much the commentators drool over Federer. Even at the end of the first set, the commentator said that Federer dropped the first set, instead of Djokovic wins the first set. As if the only reason Djokovic secured it is because Federer's mistakes, not because he earned it. I know it's speculative but it's not a huge reach if you just listen to them throughout the video. It's not exclusive to this match either, you can tell the commentators always want Federer to win.
Well Fed had 16 slams to 1 at that point.
Exactly even i was thinking the same.. these people are crazy as hell
This is part of what made me root for Djokovic back then. 2010 and 2011 especially turned me into a Djokovic fan.
Those were different times. Federer was the one to beat at that time. Djokovic played great, but at the time the defensive style of play wasn't appreciated that much.
People were still looking at Federer's mistakes, which is completely normal.
well djokovic never won due to dominance, it was always because roger played below his best. also federer was “the great” back then having 16 to 1
From what I can tell from the highlights, Federers ballstriking is as good as ever - on all fronts. Really good enough to win a slam in most cases. Djokovic simply was next level here. Incredible! You can see why he has the number of AO wins that he does.
Djokovic was the better player and he was always going to win this one. For me though its the mental failings that stand out yet again. Federer was playing well. 5-2 second set, to a 5-7 set score is so poor. Especially when you consider Nole had one slam at this point. It had already began post the 2010 US semi prior. Mentally, Federer just did not have the same strength. Time and time again, against Nadal and Djokovic, he lost slams he should have won. Not disputing that he should have lost this match. But he should never have lost it in straight sets. Watch 21.08 seconds his facial expression looks rattled. After he shanks the first point in the air for 0-15. Hes serving for the set. A chain reaction occurs, he starts to fall apart mentally. Happened way too often.
@@ben86jones82 I have a strong feeling that Fed was in denial that he was developing a mental block against Novak, and that it was costing him slams. Arrogance? stubbornness? call it what you wanna call it. Bottom line is he did nothing to address it early on (because he doesn't acknowledge that there's a problem in the first place). Hiring a sports psychologist would've been beneficial. Such a shame because he DOES have the game to beat Djokovic, it's upstairs where it always falls apart.
@@ahmedbebars6844 I may agree partially to this with you, but I would also say the opposite, Djokovic also had the game to beat Federer. He figured him out. It was not easy, cost him many losses, but he finally figured Federer out. In other words, I do agree Federer may have won more matches against Djoko if he toughened up his mentality, but Djoko would have also found a way to beat him anyways. Djoko is the very best in adaptability.
he is awesome
i feel another reason was that Federer never considered Djokovic to be talented as nadal and himself and i thought he felt like he was the more skilful player but still ended up losing most of their h2h, which definitely impacted him mentally.
2011 Federer faced djokovic in semifinals in Australian open, Roland garros and us open, Federer won in Roland garros, djokovic in Australian and us open !
And Federer had match points on his serve at Us Open
Novak had a great 2011. I like 2006 better though!
Novak is the greatest, even if Fed or Rafa is your goat you have to admit and acknowledge that Novak is the statistical goat as well as being arguably the greatest athlete ever having the most mental resilience.
@@justchillin6314 we don’t have to admit anything! Even if your goat is djoker 2006 is the best season ever for a tennis player Federer won 92 and just lost 5 matches won 12 titles 3 grand slams number 1, something that djokovic could not do even in his prime or best season.
@@pirate8731 Yes you do lol or you are in denial. Novak literally owns all the records, has every record over Fed. Novak spanked peak Fed in the 08 AO lol and that was pre-prime Novak. You are delusional, Novak’s 2 best seasons are better than Fed’s 06 season lol. Fed had a weak era and zero competition besides Rafa on clay and still fell short to Novak’s 2011 and 2015 season. Novak literally won more titles and peaked with a higher elo rating than Fed did during Novak’s best season, and yet Novak faced much better competition and did it during the hardest era of tennis so you are talking absolute nonsense, everything you have just said is straight up lies you plumb. Pathetic. Goatovic has literally debunked every fed fan boy argument and proved that Novak is far far greater than Fedal. Cope harder!
Federer has too many brain fart moments against novak
Not a few months later, at Roland-Garros, though!
@@Ben6164If only that level converted to a slam win
Insane rallying from Djokovic putting Fed on the defensive and Fed is my favorite player..
Im impressed how slow the court was back then in AO
It was slow even during the 2000s. AO was made faster only from 2017 and Djokovic ruled that too.
Brilliant hitting from the baseline by the Djoker!
What a slow court. Incredible
Ever since AO became faster Djokovic has won 4. Now keep crying.
@@menon_ji4984that doesn’t change the fact that is super slow here
@@NamTran-xc2ip faster than the rebound ace used before 2008
Federer was playing great but got demolished by that monster.
He was caught off guard by Djokovic's level early in 2011, and he wasn't at his best until the French Open. He definitely played his best and the French and USO. Djokovic had to play probably one of the best matches ever to win their USO match. Regardless, this is peak Djokovic and not peak Federer.
@@spiritlance364 This is not peak Federer, but it is prime Federer at 29 years of age. Just because he lost, doesn’t mean he wasn’t at his best. Sure, he wasn’t at his “absolute” best, but I don’t agree that it took him that many tournaments (and losses) against Novak to be at his best at the French. Then again, when Federer loses, he’s not at his best. Federer was at his best in Dubai and Indian wells as he didn’t drop a set until facing Novak.
@@tolendoi123 Federer doesn't need to be at his best to not drop sets against most players, especially back then. Just look at his level of play in this match, Indian Wells and Dubai compared to the French and US. He was a step slower earlier in the year and slicing too many backhands. The backhand didn't penetrate or spread the court at all in this match and also the Indian Wells match. He played at a much higher level in the next two grand slam matches. That was Federer's best level at the time.
He was past his peak and still matched peak Djokovic shot for shot at the French and US. He arguably played better in both but lost one.
Its a bit debatable if he was prime in 2011 because altough he had his moments I just felt was vulnerable to upsets as his consistency declined and overall his performance did It is for sure that federer's prime ended in AO 2010 after than a lot of bad losses and early upsets were clearly showing federer was playing his worst tennis since winning sw19 2003 , I felt he got rejuvented after his horrible wimbledon when he hired paul annacone I felt the end of the season was good primish federer level ,going into 2011 I felt he was good the ics are I felt he had a pretty bad clay season before the epic french open form (epic form that I dont believe equals his 2007 or 2006 clay form ) and that match where he really played bad vs Tsonga in wimbledon, you know what I am okay considering 2011 and 2012 his prime because although I believe his level was clearly higher from TMC03 to TMC07 I felt he showed the same inconsistency problems in 08 and 10 and even 09 to an extent but in 09 I felt his peak level was clearly higher than the other years like 08,2010,2011,2012 . Prime federer is something like from wimbledon 2003 to wimbledon 2012 , for nadal I think its from 2005 to 2014 and for nole from 2011 to 2023 ? Lol he seems so focused and dedicated that I dont see much decline in his game like I ve seen for fedal I cant call a guy who is going for calendar slam out of prime , the thing is I really believe even tho injuries happen and ect ect what makes djokovic the goat is that he is more dedicated just more willing to stick to that diet recovery ,to meditate, to live and breathe tennis thats why we are witnessing the slowest decline ever because this guy has pushed the dedication and mental to new levels never seen before , I did never a player who still believed in victory while down 2 consecutive championship points on the serve of one the greatest serveurs of all time
@@spiritlance364 Djokovic won more points and win his 2 sets way easier than Federer
Djokovic's forehand was really good over here...
They were 16-1 in slams here. Incredible
😂😂😂 4-2 Federer before this match...
@@lorenzomarchi6635He means Federer had 16 slams and Djokovic had 1...
@@Rory626 Yes. I know this.
The point at 30-40 in the first game itself highlights that Federer has strategy issues against Djokovic.
He hit a wonderful return but Djokovic's defensive shot was deep but then Federer just kept defending, asking the question if Djokovic could hit a winner. In the end, Djokovic went for it and won.
The Strategy that Federer uses against Djokovic in tie-breakers and the important points is to usually wait for an opening or a miss from Djokovic
But Djokovic rarely misses on big points. He missed 2 shots against Alcaraz and lost.
If he would have missed it at Wimbledon 2019, he would have lost too.
But as it happens rarely, players should not rely on Djokovic to miss. Federer should just have gone for his shots and trusted his aggressive play which he usually did during the match but not on big points.
Very true
exactly, as well balanced as djokovic is, he is ultimately a defensive oriented player, and thus aggressiong or takign the point to him is the way to defeat him
To play with a one handed backhand against Djokovic is simply very difficult. Hes playing with so much intensity, so good in the defense and most time gets the mistake from Roger. But this was the first match wich Novak played so well against Roger. He took a big step in early 2011 and maybe Roger was a little surprised because he beat him the last three matches.
It´s clear now that the 2009 US Open gave Novak a lot of confidence for this victory.
It didn't help that many of his backhands were landing in the middle of the court, like the one at 0:56.
Thank you so much for the highlights!!
Great quality, but in order to get the 50fps from an interlaced video, you should use enconde it to progressive with handbrake using yadiff + bob
too much work for me
Great match from Djokovic!
It's unbelievable what a big step Novak made at the beginning of 2011. He was like another, better player who suddenly played almost without unforced errors.
The only thing that's annoying is that he screams so loud during the match.
At all the match was very close but Novak played the big points very well/better.
And maybe Federer didn't serve as well as usual.
14:11 - Novak's defensive backhand for a passing shot cross court is what really separates him. Rogers approach shot was pretty good.
Каков Новак тихничний,смотреть можно вечно.Федерер легенда, Новак маэстро
Pozdrav! brate iz Srbije!
When I watched 2011ao, I saw this less power and speed Federer could resist every set until the end, which made me more convinced that the 07ao Federer over any version ao Djokovic.
Not on this court though. It plays like clay
@@AlexisNess-mn4zw shouldn’t Nadal have won 2012 AO if it played like clay?
@@BardhanProductions Its a figure of speech but the court was high bouncing and slow. That was nadals best shot to beat Djoker at AO outside of potential 2013 and 14
Beautiful.
LA CABRA desde esos tiempos😊
When ever roger loses its past his peak. Novak is still at his prime at 2023. Please.
Novak is not in his prime rn
that didn't age well, how did he go against a 20 year old who was only on grass for the 2nd or 3rd time in his pro career? meanwhile 38 year old Roger casually outplayed 32 year old Novax in 2019. Please.
I'd argue Novak has not been in his prime since 2016, maybe 2017... but much like Lebron James who is well past his prime, a Novak past his prime was (and still is) better than virtually every other player alive. even a Federer that was WAAAAY past his prime in 2018/2019 was still making grand slam finals because he was still better than 95+% of the men's draw aged 38 years old!
@@steinanderson maybe because that 20 years old is one of the most complete player the sport has ever seen at this age. If you want to find some arguments why roger is better than novak then try something else because your comparison doesn't make any sense.
@@decseibeni more complete and talented on grass than Novax was at 32? ;)
Good match
Djoko going berserk in this one. Very quick and forcing.
Fed gave away easy points from the backhand side 😢
how many slams would fed win if he had a double handed backhand?
I dont understand the single handed backhand.
It looks inferior as a technique to double handed backhand.
德约科维奇就是克 费德勒 、 是难以逾越的大山⛰️
مرعب هذا النوڤاك 🤍🤍
Djokovic il a réussi à rentrer dans la tête de Federer et il y est rester jusqu'à sa retraite 😂
Wtf is going on with Federer's backhand, literally a massive weakness lol idk how he managed to get to semis convincingly this tournament, maybe cos of his other strokes too good
what do you mean? this was 2011 he would obviously beat almost everyone he played against even without his best backhand
Yeah that backhand was terrible man, way to many miss hits. Fortunately Fed fixed this when he played against Novak again at RG the same year. That was arguably Fed’s best performance on clay ever though, but its Fed’s inconsistencies in the crucial moments that always let him down against Novak as if he’s been effected by Novak psychologically because of how mentally resilient Novak is.
This was probably Fed’s worst backhand performance against Djokovic. Looked much better the previous year’s tournament.
the vegan diet started kicking in to djokovic around this time
Federer here is dropping too many short balls
Although the match is old, I would like to comment here on the aggression adopted by Western newspapers against the Serbian Hurricane and even some of the referees and the public, but Novak destroyed all the hopes of the organizers in most of the tournaments, who dreamed of Novak losing and applied pressure and racism against him, and let us not forget his exclusion from the United States Championship under the pretext of hitting the ball on the ground. One of the line referees or one of the football collectors, and certainly Novak does not mean that, and do not forget his exclusion from the Australian Championship under the pretext of not being vaccinated with the Corona vaccine. Also, the Americans excluded him for the same reason and all this racism so that Novak’s name is not recorded in history as the player who has won the most Grand Slam and Masters tournaments, but the Serbian Falcon disappointed their hopes and achieved What Federer and Nadal did not achieve, as Djokovic is the only player in history who won more matches than Federer and Nadal... currently the number is 24, and I hope that next year he will achieve all the Grand Slam tournaments. We love you, Janovac
A esta persona que presenta estos partidos se nota que odia a Roger Federer y eso no es agradable.
Heavy court
Novak was always very lucky when he played against Roger Federer.
Xaxaxaxaxa
Not true. You can see that during the set Federer was aggressive and Novak had trouble dealing with Fed's forehand. However in the tie breaks and other important points Fed got conservative, thinking eventually Novak would slip, which he never did. Over the years this got in Fed's head and he just couldn't deal with it. If Fed had just figured it out he would be the all time leader in SLAMS. Instead it's Novak.
Count Federer as lucky to be born 6 years before Novak
What Federer needed to improve was his serve. He needed Pete for that job. With Pete's like serve he would have become nearly unbeatable. Apart from this Joker is simply the best in Australia. Nadal, obviously in Paris. But Federer could have dominated Wimbledon and US Open on a higher level and thus the GOAT question. He just took wrong decisions. And he was less lucky than Joker and Nadal. He lost matches that were on his racquet.
That’s not luck though, he’s just a level below in the mental game vs his biggest rivals. Federer is one of the best server in history so not sure wym
He was playing with a knee injury was he not? Something that started in 2010…Against the advice of his support team … refused to stay back , I heard, in a recent video , from a team member who decided to put it in the public domain now . Fed furnace them from publicizing this then . That’s who he is. He played because he just wanted to . He was totally out of his element.
Bullshit, u don't play like that with an injury. He lost because djoko outplayed him
That was Nadals story.....
Stop stealing Nadal’s excuses 😂😂
is federer matfixxing
Laughable how FED fans pull out the past his prime card........so fed was past his prime in 2011? how about 2007 when Nole started beating him/😁😆🤣😂😅😂explain to me how Nole at 36 can still compete and beat many of the much younger players......
Make it 'All of younger players nearly half his age'. Alcaraz got so lucky, only he and Djokovic and tennis experts know that fact.
Nah he definitely was in his prime in 2011 but still Novak was starting to become this beast that we've now known.Even though Rog got to number at 36 and a half he was still not as fit as Novak,so who Novak how longer Novak will stay up there?
Maybe since current young players are not as good as Djokovic was? lol
Fed’s prime ended after winning Wimbledon in 2012. Novak was just an absolute beast in 2011 which is why I consider it the most goat year ever in tennis despite Novak winning more in 2015 and finishing with more ranking points, the competition in 2011 was harder than it was in 2015 so what Novak did in 2011 beats what Novak did in 2015, and what Fed did in 2006 for me.
And Nole failed the very moment he faced a younger prodigy in Alcaraz.
Djokovic career is terminated by carlos
Just because of one tight win, which Djokovic came very close to winning in straight sets. Djokovic demolished Carlos in French Open, but Carlos barely won Wimbledon. So, learn to talk sense, not what media tells you gullible mass.
@@AlanGoswami-nz9lg While I disagree with the OC, Djokovic didn't demolish Alcaraz in RG. They were completely even until he got cramps, a problem he solved for their next match which took place in an environment that completely favored Djokovic. Alcaraz still leads the H2H.
@@MrTonyMartinocramps are caused by bad preparations and the pressure from the opponent. Havimg cramps is not an excuse
Novak has entered his thirty-seventh year, and we wish him health and wellness and to continue entertaining us with this fine art. Carlos is 20 years old, and the difference is approximately 17 years. I noticed that our Serbian Falcon defeated Carlos in Cincinnati and reached number 24 in the Grand Slam.. Djokovic recorded his shining name in the history book, and do not forget. Age has its rules, and yet the Serbian hurricane will remain a source of concern for all tennis players, despite the large age difference.
And he wins in 24th. More to come
If Federer was half as good at hitting backhands as he was at fixing his hair every point, he'd have 30 slams
Its damn good hair tho
but yeah his backhand was his weakness
What a stupid comment to make. Criticising a player like Roger Federer, who won 20 Slams, more than everyone who ever played tennis bar just two, is idiotic, that's the only word for it.
How good is your backhand?
@@patrickw9706 better than yours lil bro
I believe he should have changed his raquet to 97 inch from that moment
Jokoviç 💪💪
Federer backhand doesn't seem good here
Beautiful.