The irony is that Novak would go on to hit that same winner over and over again in critical moments of grand slams for the rest of his career. That's called skill, confidence, and hard work, Roger.
@@fortitude1208 nothing to lose? He has everything to lose, the chip is at stake, something that he has worked for all his life. I think he inside and outside is diferent story. Inside he is calm and thinks about his next move (shot). So he wasnt desperate here.
How is calling a terrible (and lucky) shot on match point after the fact in a press conference poor "sportsmanship"? Only if calling a spade a spade is poor sportsmanship.
@@lucasc3651 Why was it a "terrible (and lucky) shot"? Because Federer was the one losing the point? If Federer hit that shot you would be praising him for coming up with a magical return winner is such a important situation. Federer's whole game consists of slapping winners off both wings, but when Djokovic is the one that decides to up his aggressiveness it is a poor way to play? Still so salty after all these years...
Quoting Ekaterina Makarova's response when the sorest loser in women tennis Wozniacki claimed that she was lucky but won't go far during last year's Wimbledon "Yeah, maybe I was lucky today. Good for me". Sadly, both Federer and Wozniacki are always glorified as well-liked, very popular, and genuine by the media.
This moment is realy important in tennis history, this is when Roger realized Novak is gonna be a real problem, 10 years later he has every major record better than Federer.
@@IwanSetiawan-dv1wl I think the main reason is because since Nadal and Federer had come up before Djokovic, everyone either cheered for Roger or Rafa. So when Djokovic started beating both of them everybody was mad because they only wanted to see Fed and Nadal win. Also, Djokovic is way more emotional on the court. He shows his anger and tennis fans hate that.
@@IwanSetiawan-dv1wl it's delusional fans not being able to cope with the thought that someone who's not their idol could be so successful in the same sport and win all the big titles. Fedal fans hate Novak because he trashes their idols, it has very little to do with where he is from (and I say that as a Serb)
2:04 "It could be worse, could be a final".. Be careful what you say, Roger... Cause it just happened. And on Wimbeldon... The SAME shot... An even bigger match... Bigger crowd, bigger occasion... The Longest Wimbeldon Final in History... So learn to appreciate and respect opponent. Nadal would never said such thing, he would be happy to lose in a final instead of SF.
I just want to say something regarding Federer that has to be said. Federer here literally sums up everything about him and all the stigma regarding his "class" and "sportsmanship". Federer had the easiest way possible out of all tennis player. He is easily most loveable western world media darling and gold cow for making money. He was made throughout the years like that. His tennis skills are not questionable. He is still strong contender to be the GOAT, BUT! But, as i said, he showed up in a very crucial moment in tennis history, after Agassi and Sampras, where tennis needed some new star, some new role model, some new figure to pump out those monies. He was the perfect man for it - Swiss passport, British roots, South African roots, world man from rich representative country. Everything fits perfect. Add to that his immense talent and dedication and you have perfect man or should i say - "Trophy wife". Later, the more time went passing by, and him winning everything, the media and public went even more crazy towards him. It was everything super easy for him. He was unquestioned about anything. They LOVED him, and they cashed in on him and he cashed it on them. This created super easy atmosphere for Federer to have "Class". How to not have class when you have everything? You have all media and public consolidating you after you lose. You have everyone just patting your back and looking after you drop out of tournament or injure yourself. He had literally EVERYTHING. More than any other tennis player ever. He was not just best tennis player ever, he was public and media icon. They cared for him, and everyone loved him. And then Nadal happened, starts winning. And then rivalry happened - ok. But then something else happened - third person, unwanted person enters the game. He wants to prove himself, he wants to win, he wants to be the best (as everyone else). This totally ruined the concept. Everything that was easy and in favor to Federer was the opposite for Djokovic. Here Federer reveals his "class", this is just a tiny glimpse of his anger and frustration when he realized he is flawed, his facade starting to peel off. This is the exact point of all the stigma that is floating around Federer everywhere. He is just a salty player who cannot cope that better defeated him, and in what way? He risked whole tournament based on that return. And Federer cannot understand that? That is because Federer didn't have to do it, he was always in safe mode, playing his best level of tennis, but that's it, never needing to prove someone something. Which both Nadal and Djokovic had to do (Djokovic the most out of all three). This is really sad, i wish this conference would be shown to everyone everywhere all the time, just for the sake of it. For masks to fall down, and then to judge these three tennis players only on real facts. This is not class. It's easy to have class that way. The class is to have almost everyone against you, watching your every move and mistake, crashing on you, while you keep winning and praise others. Djokovic never disputed Federer, and never disputed Nadal, despite everything. In my opinion Djoko showed class more than any other player. Time will tell.
@@JohnnyRugged06 Really? When Novak won 20th GS, he said at the trophy presentation that he is there because of Fed and Nadal. When he beat Nadal at 2021 RG he said "it is a privilege to share the court with him." Not to mention everything else. When did Nadal show something like that, apart from showing zero camaraderie in Novak's worst lifetime situation, when even Kyrgios showed support? Nadal class...come on.
a great comment. At least Federer matured a bit 8 years later, when even more painful loss happened, and behaved much better. But this is who he really was then. A western media created golden cow that herds of sad souls wanted to identify with. Actually, a salty man.
@@severinrisan9006 Oh and he has said he was lucky after winning matches like this. He said that after US Open 2014 vs Monfils, Wimbledon 2009 vs Roddick, AO 2020 vs Millman, AO 2020 vs Sandgren, etc.
"I should have won." "He gets one lucky shot." I believe that hard work pays off, and I cant play like that." RF really is a sore sore loser. He has about as much grace as a 3-legged goat on an icy pond.
- "I feel like I should be doing the other press conference." - "...you feel like he was mentally out of it already, and just gets the lucky shot in the end." - "Confidence, are you kidding me? Some players go up and play like that. I remember losing junior matches, when they're just being down 5-2 in the third , and they just start slapping shots and it all goes in for some reason. Because that's kinda way they grew up playing when they were down. I never play that way. I believe in that "hard work's gonna pay of" kind of thing." So this is the biggest sportsman in tennis? So this is the classiest ever? So this is the man that will stay the GOAT whatever Nadal and Novak win until the end of their careers, because of the way he conducts himself and because of his behavour? I think you guys picked the wrong man to put all of these superlatives.
This guy is tennis, he's 5 years older than that Djokovic clown and still in his head. He has one bad moment? Djokovic has been like this so many times and u still love him. Stfu.
@@PCTennis Djokovic never said stuff like that, that's first. About anyone. That "his shots just go in for some reason". And second, this isn't about Novak. It's Federer's press conference, I am talking about his behaviour here. Why you always compare him to Novak? All I'm saying is, he can't be considered classiest ever, and best sportsman and similar stuff with this attitude. Period. No need to bring anyone else in the talk.
Think about Roger's position here. He just lost a us open semi final to his second biggest rival after having two match points. You think he's gonna be all cheery and happy afterwards? It was very clear in Djokovic's demeanor before that forehand winner that he was angry and did not care much anymore. As a result, he decided to slap the ball as hard as he could to see what would happen. I'm not sure how much tennis you've played in your life, but most people can relate to that feeling. Roger put it well in his example from juniors tennis. Some people get angry when they're about to lose and just start bashing balls, and sometimes it works. Seeing as how Roger personally disagrees with that type of mentality, it's obvious why he'd be a little ticked off. What exactly is your problem with his comments?
@@LzPwns First, yeah he's great, but Djokovic's a professional tennis player too. No need to drag his win down by making such comments. He was a better player, he won, accept it and get over ir. Respect your rival, accept that he just made one of the best shots in tennis history, and move on. Second, comparing one of the biggest players at the moment to junior players in terms of mentality is wrong in so many ways, no need to explain. Third, Djokovic played better in the end. It didn't "all go in for some reason". Problem is he can't accept that the other player was better. Fourth, Djokovic did it three times. It wasn't just pure luck, but better mental stability and focus, down to earth mentality. And Roger knows that. He found a way to win in that situations, to overplay Roger, not just slapping balls because of anger. Fifth, he was facing one of the best returners in the game. And not to talk about accepting that it was his geniousness to hit the return, he denies the confidence in that moment too. He denies the confidence to a man who wins when whole arena is cheering the opponent and booing him? Sixth, even if it was understandable - but it isn't - it still isn't sportsmanship and a class act. Period.
@@95Minja 1. It looks like fed had accepted all that and was trying to move on. The reporters kept asking about that particular part of the match and fed explicitly said he accepted the loss, that its in the past, and that he is moving on. 2. What's wrong about that comparison? Many professional athletes, not just tennis players, have mentalities comparable to 16, 17, 18 year-olds. I get that he's a top level adult athlete, but that doesn't mean he's a robot. We're all human here. 3. Never said he didn't play better. And yeah, maybe fed's choice of words "all go in for some reason" is a little extra, but he wasn't trying to say all of novaks shots from that point on were "going in for some reason". He was just elaborating on his example of a bitter, angry junior player who starts slapping every ball trying to hit winners when they feel they've lost the match. I think Fed knows that's not what novak did for the rest of the fifth set. He's just saying that the return winner, which gave novak new life and sparked the comeback, did come as a result of that particular mentality. Fed almost always gives credit to those that beat him and he compliments their game. But when it was this close and he literally had the match on his racket, its tough not to feel like you should have won. 4. Djokovic is absolutely better than anyone in terms of mental stability and focus. But that particular moment where he hit the return winner was like a "screw this match, let me smash this return and if it goes in, awesome, if not, whatever". His facial expression before the return says it all. 5. Again, you're misinterpreting novaks mental state. Of course he had confidence and focus from that point on, but the reporters question was about the return winner. Careless anger, not confidence, was the overwhelming state of mind for that moment. Sure, he wasn't being a class act here. Doesn't make his comments wrong though.
dang if novak have had the same press conference it would've been blown out of proportion, the double standard for roger is real, lost a bit of respect for roger after watching this for the first time today, he's 30 already at this point already for god's sake, a bit out of his character, or maybe this is his true character lol
U posted this 4 days ago, it's been 8 YEARS since this happened , he was unsportsmanlike here but u should know better and realize that he's way more mature now and u can easily tell
@@likunyang7609 u have made that clear, I said he was being immature, but there's no need to complain about this behavior 8 years later when he clearly doesn't act the same anymore
@@Gone2pluto for him, a 10 year vet on tour, and 16 time grand slam champion at this point to not even give a young gun on the rise any credit for such a incredible match, don't you think that says a bit about the person's true color. Roger's too used to being the top dog and winning, he never learned to be more gracious and humble in defeat like rafa and nole until he actually experienced that himself the last 10 years, rafa and nole are much more mature mentally than him, at least at the same age
@@likunyang7609 yes, but he's human, and I believe for the reason that he is so successful, it was hard for him to accept defeat when he was so close to a final, but I understand what u mean, at that time, his attitude was poor
+Soham Chak All the Australian Open matches with Novak since 2008 have been 'owning'. :D Federer never 'owns' Novak on his favourite surface (grass) either. And not even Nadal for that matter.
Maybe I can help Roger to understand how some players can play "a shot like that on match point" ... it's called HAVING BALLS ... There you go, I hope you understand now.
Yes and no, as he said, he was not used to face match point in GS during his career, but Novak definitely was, and is to the credit of Federer that he was seldom in that situation. Is very important that observation to understand his future mental failings at GS, is ironic, but he was so dominant like no one else in the history, dispatching rivals as fast as he could in GS that obviously he just didn't give himself the opportunity to develop a strong mentality when down in the scoreboard, by contrast Nadal and Djokovic faced match points enough times in all kinds of rounds of GS (before and during their prime) to develop that mentality
@@martinoa1467 You can only have luck if you have balls man. If you don't have balls to try something you definitely won't have a chance to have a luck with it.
@@zy9662 He is used to facing match points in GS several times in his career especially against Rafa in FO before 2011.Not sure what you are talking about there but the excuses are laughable.
@@zy9662 The quality of the opposition wasn't like that of Nadal and later Djokovic, so it was easier for Fed to dominate. Don't even bother saying players like Gonsalez and Baghdatis were of the standard of Nadal and Djoker. By 2011 Fed should have been used to being defeated.
@@lordawesome-epicgaming2866 This was when his sense of entitlement was in full flow. After 2012, he had 5 years of not winning a major to come back down to Earth.
Federer's (well-hidden, usually) arrogance is why I think Nadal is a distinctly better sportsman. But of course Fed almost always wins the award regardless.
Explain the arrogance here. I don't see roger claiming "he was the better player" like injury faker jokeovic once did in a loss against Nadal when he got sent home licking the dirt off of Nadal's feet in the 2000s. Dude almost got beat up by Andy roddick in the locker room for his drama queen injury faking acts in US open 2008
Just thought of something else. Why is it when Novak makes a great shot, it's a lucky shot. When Federer makes a shot like that, he is the maestro. Why doesn't Roger just give him his do? He is playing fantastic tennis and is backing it up with win after win.
Because Djokovic will go all out and it's 50/50 whether Djokovic's shot will be brilliant. Djokovic had managed to get the 50 everytime whereas Federer does those shots basically every single match.
2:14 is the moment I went from being Roger Federer fan to a Novak Djokovic fan. I like people who are humble despite all achievements and not let it get in their heads. By this time: RF: 16 RN: 10 NJ: 3 RF thought he could just dismiss NJ 13 GS behind him thinking he himself was the GOAT. Little did he know.. Still crickets from RF after Djokovic's 23rd.
What the F**K .!? am I listening to? He's talking about the guy, who lost two tournaments that year(French Open and Cinncinati), winning everything else and beating everybody;'talks without respect/honor, "lucky shots", ... and he was the "Fairness Champion" for so many years on tour? C'mmon, ... are Y kiddin'?
sjaruj Don't dramatize. He gave him due respect. Had every reason to be this disappointed as this was the second year in a row where he had 2 match points and lost the match. He did conclude very clearly that he had only himself to blame. It's more a case of journalists asking stupid questions and rubbing it in endlessly.
+sjaruj The Fairness Champion (or the Stefan Edberg Sportsmanship Award) is highly skewed towards top players. None of the top 5 deserve this honour, yet they get it. The ones who truly deserve it are guys like Tim Smycek, Andreas Seppi, Del Potro, Tsonga, Marco Baghdatis, etc. Roger is as sulky as all professionals are, and as this video is evidence, he wasn't even good at hiding it. (Don't forget his under-the-radar pre-2003 years, where he regularly threw racquets and tantrums)
Federer fans: ''Federer always win the sportmanship award becuase he is such a gentleman''. Me: ''No Federer always wins the sportmanship award because he is the most popular player on tour and all his bad deeds are ignored.''
Majestic King by spitting at the crowd? Breaking racquets when he’s losing? Calling timeouts when he’s down everytime? He’s a clown. When do you ever see Nadal say anything like this or act like an idiot on court? He’s never broke a racquet in his life. He always gives his opponent credit. Federer got pissed off because he lost 2 straight years to the same guy in the same situation, up 40-15. He’s going to be in a bad mood, but he took this a little too far. If it was me I would have said congrats to novak, job well done, and move on. Him and Nadal don’t like Djokovic’s ego because it’s a disgrace to the game of tennis. Nadal would haven’t have acted like this because he’s always positive and a good sportsman, Federer is a good sportsman most of the time, but I think where he was dominating from 03-10 he let the fame and glory get the better of him after he didn’t win a slam that year.
Roger showed his true colors in this press conference. This is the real Roger Federer - unbelieveable lack of class. He makes it seem like 1 save of match point caused Novak to go on to save another match point and then get the break back and then hold serve and then break Roger in the game after and then hold serve to win the match. Does Roger forget he double faulted? Does he forget all the lines and angles and corners Nole was finding in the points after that? Roger is a tool.
When things go his way from beginning to end (like in the USO 2007 finale against Djokovic) "me, me, me" When they don't, "the other player got lucky" Says it all.
@@Aldorlea when did Roger say that here. Stop crying so hard, it's nowhere near as shameless as third wheel jokeobitch literally saying "I was the better player" when he got sent home licking the clay off of Nadal's feet in a clay match against him once. Don't ever talk about "me, me, me" when a egoistic injury fskingthird wheel like jokeovic walks this earth
@janice thyss Hi again from Novak. Will be returning with a couple more by the end of year so watch this space. Djoker has already vested both of them.
Djokovic is a true champion.Since the moment he reached the Top of ATP list,organizers started with setting up,it was well known that Djokovic won about 90% of matches against Nadal on hard court,but it was also the fact that crowd wanted to see Federer - Nadal final,so Djokovic always played with Federer in semifinals when Federer was in his best shape.Second thing,Djokovic always played against crowd.It doesn't matter if he played Wimbledon,RG,US Open or AO,crowd always supported his opponent.
You do realize that the draw is determined by ranking, right? Djokovic 1st seed is bound to play Federer, 3rd seed, and Rafa 2nd seed is destined to meet the 4th seed, which was Andy Murray. 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 4 so the final is 1 vs 2, which is what it was, Rafa vs Novak. Was Novak being number 1 and Roger being number 3 rigged? Haha
@@IzakD8you do realize the original commenter is implying that they rigged the seeding, right? The always seeded it to where Nadal and Federer could meet in the finals
It's when he loses, which didn't happen often earlier, that you really see how "classy" Federer is. Losing to Nadal is about the only loss he could take without being rude or sullen. I'm not sure that Novak won because he "slapped one lucky shot." He contrasts the idea of 'hard work' with the way Novak plays, which, you have to admit, is pretty silly.
@@Aldorlea That’s not why; Federer won 14 more points in the 2019 Wimbledon final. Novak won this match (and Wimbledon 2019) because he played the important points better.
I'm a fan of his, but I didn't like his arrogance when he was between his 20 and 30 years old; by the way, he changed a lot since then and he's now more gracious in defeat and balanced in his observations: why should you be fixed on this interview and not reconsider to respect him again? This interview is a silly reason to even lose respect for someone.
@@ermattia no it absolutely isn't. Federer has NEVER spoken out against the bias of the crowds that favour him over his opponents. Especially against Novak, crowds have been incredibly disrespectful in their matches. He never speaks out during or after the game. Out of the big 3, Federer has the worst attitude.
It happened almost 10 years ago. I'm not justifying him, he didn't handle that loss well. But, he's an overall very nice guy and an example of class-act and sportsmanship. We all bad days. The Big 3 are great examples of class-act and sportsmanship tbh
I don't understand why Federer explains it like the only shot that mattered was that return at 40:15. Even if that shot was pure luck, he still had 1 more match point and was still serving for the match. Even after the second match point, he was still serving at 40:40 and had a chance to finish it. If you crumble every time someone saves one match point with a lucky shot and can't progress in the match (considering even when he lost his serve, he was still leading in the match and had every chance to at least get to a tiebreak), then your criticism should be pointed at yourself.
I wonder if he he still believes that it was pure luck, after Novak has done it time and time again in the biggest matches. I used to say that Nadal was mentally strongest player ever, but after 2014 Djokovic unlocked new heights of mental strength that even Nadal didnt reach.
IMO Roger believes anything except the fact that he isn't the "GOAT", that's why he is coming back, to enjoy the spotlight a bit further, but I see him losing in the second round of Wimbledon and going out in an embarrassing whimper made only worse by the media saying that he played "some of the best tennis ever" in that time. While Nadal Djokovic dominate the slams for the next 3/4 years, with no such coverage.
Well it's more to it then that. Nadal unlike novak also gets crowd support like fed does. So in reality novaks mental game goes even deeper.... He's basically fighting off the crowd and the opponent most of the time unlike fed/nadal.
Not anymore, Rafa’s latest comments about Novak in an interview makes Rafa the most saltiest and arrogant now. Back at this time I agree Fed was the more arrogant over Rafa, but in recent years Roger has been complimentary towards Novak and shown him respect, unlike Rafa who is more bitter towards Novak than ever before.
fedfans if you wanna know what a real champion sounds like listen to nadal after he loses a match. He always concedes the other player played better, and never makes excuses. Ever
vijanatrix Well, Nadal didn't give full credit to Soderling after his upset loss at Roland Garros in 2009. Saying he didn't have his day and that he played too short, which made it easier for Soderling.
I think Nadal only phraises his rival when its Roger or Novak or some lose it didnt hurt him, but when he suffer an upset he doesnt give credit at all and talk about how bad he was playing or some physical impediment, example his loss vs gonzalez in A0 2007 he was really salty cause he wasnt expected to be trashed by a player he thought it wouldnt be a big problem, same with soderling, in rg 2009, kyrgios and brown in wimbledon, Fognini in us open, etc
@@stevewood-park3712 he didn’t blame his injury I watched that entire press conference. He said Djokovic played really well and it wasn’t his day. “I know I can’t win 20 RG” is what he said sooner or later he’s going to be beat there, nobody is invincible, especially out of his prime.
imagine being Federer winning 2018 AO , you’re 20th slam thinking you’ve secured the record and GOAT status for a long time only to become almost irrelevant 5 years later with 4 slams behind and all your records broken by the real GOAT😅😅😅
@@euneadventure3112 On court behaviour is completely irrelevant to one’s personality off the court my guy. Rublev is one of the nicest players on the tour but on court he gets very animated. Djokovic was never once disrespectful to Federer while on a tennis court, never bad mouthed Federer in any post match press conferences unlike Federer who did plenty of times to Djokovic. Federer even told Djokovic’s corner to shut up once while on the court. Djokovic despite his outbursts in the past on the court and a few racket breaks, he never once directed it towards his opponent, so what you said doesn’t apply because it’s how one is in defeat that determines the true character of someone, not when in a match and having a great desire to win so they get angry sometimes. Djokovic was always humble in defeat as he was in victory unlike Fedal who were always sore losers.
Federer showed he’s class or lack of it here Djokovic was angry at the crowd and not the fact he thought he would lose they were cheering every time he made a mistake or even double fault I’ve never seen Rafa or djoko react like this after a loss
The most consequential forehand in tennis history for sure. And I think Djokovic also hit the most consequential backhand in tennis history, when he hit that backhand down the line in the 2019 Wimbledon final tiebreak to go up 6-3, it was the shot that guaranteed the win!
It's true that none of us know what it is like to lose a grand slam semi in that fashion, so it's hard to say what is an appropriate reaction. However, we do see other top players on the tour lose devastating matches on every year and I believe it is at least a valid opinion that in this instance, Federer was a pretty shitty loser.
@@unowen7591 I won a match similar to this one (down 5-3 AD-40 on my opponent's serve and won 7-5) and my opponent was pretty salty about it. He very abruptly shook my hand with his head down. But could I blame him? I should have lost that match.
@@unowen7591 Yeah, people call him a sore loser but are here commenting on a press conference 10 years ago lol. Just let it go (and that was one of the matches I celebrated the most in my life).
@@unowen7591 funny if djokovic had acted this way this would be plastered all the media. People would be calling him classless and hating hard. But since its roger, its ok, its normal!
@@unowen7591 No novak would definitely not act this way lol. He always credits his opponents no matter what. Rog is not a gentleman everyone thinks he is apparently. The double standards is laughable and disgraceful in tennis. I'll gladly be done with it when novak and rafa retire.
@@rishitdasgupta2433 yea hahahaha.But now Wimbeldon set him up.Points from wimbeldon will not count and Novak won last year so he losing 2 000 points.Propaganda will try everything to stop goat
Now imagine the opposite situation: Djokovic loses to Federer and gives the exact same answers as Roger in press conference. He would have got crucified. Federer looks absolutely arrogant and classless here.
@@alexmeechan15 he learnt it was normal for him to choke at 40-15, not luck, so he wasn't as mad. Winning match points at wimbledon and us open with crowd on your side? No, no its not possible for Choker Federer. Choking in big finals against rivals and having the worst H2H record? Yes!
Today, as Novak Goatkovic stands on the top of the mountain alone as the undisputed Greatest Mens’ Tennis Player of All Time, I come to watch this jealous petty so-called classiest player of the game calling Novak’s unplayable winners as lucky, with a sense of overflowing joy and happiness. I love how he still keeps the grudge to this day of how Goatkovic beat him again and again after this piece of drivel and he never ever could admit Goatkovic’s greatness. Nadal congratulated him straightaway for the greatest achievement of record breaking 23 GS but this jealous self-centred man still doesn’t have the decency to complement his colleague even today. And still Goatkovic has the sheer sportsmanship of stating that Fedal made him what he is today.
Absolutely beautiful. Waited however long to be able to come to this video to declare that, even on the day that Novak stands on top of the mountain, Federer is still the most important thing to you. I will say it for the umpteenth time: Novak fandom is NOTHING without Federer. All of your feelings, your admiration, and your devotion to Novak is driven by Federer. No more proof needed than your desire for his recognition and validation of your hero. Even with 23 slams, Novak alone is not enough for you.
@@flyingsaucer8199 And Federer's fandom is nothing but EGOist, jealousy driven and full of inferiority complex. The two great adversaries in his time and he could not beat either of them.
You can't have it both ways! You can't fall down and worship at the feet of Federer for his "classiness" and then make excuses when he comes off as a pompous ass because he lost! It's easy to be "humble" when you've been so rarely humbled. What's more is he tried to diminish Djokovic's win. Tennis is a sport where it's about whom wins the final point, not whom played the better tennis on the whole in the match. You take the good with the bad. I lost respect for Federer here not because he is human, but because he and the media play into that pseudo "classy" persona. And excuse his often bitchy and snippy attitude with backhanded compliments and barbs continually at the expense of his opponents. Justified in the media because he is, FEDERER. Period!
This was one press conference, where he was speaking just minutes after losing one of the most devastating matches of his career. It was also the match that left him Slamless in a season for the first time since 2002. By all accounts of those that know him, Federer is one of the classiest guys on tour. He was not the classiest guy here, no - he could have worded things a little bit differently - but he clearly was not in a frame of mind to speak eloquently about the way things went less than half an hour after his collapse on court, especially when the match meant that much to him. And by the way, the media makes him out to be classy because that is all we have heard from everybody who has ever known him.
Kyle Johansen even as fed fan i feel doing this press conference is one of the most stupid things roger did no way was he gonna be objective about what happened in the match. especially when it happened the year before . He should have pulled a Sir Alex Ferguson and refused to do the interview and pay a fine there was no way 30 minutes after losing like that your gonna give the other guy his due credit the pain was still so raw.
"Novak he was totally mentally out of it - I should have won!". So - if he was mentally out of it, how come he saved 2 match points and went to win the last 4 games of the match. Novak is a giant, in a way that Roger will never be. He's a truly all-round great person, enjoys life, connects well with the crowd, humourous, relaxed - but let's not forget that he is also #1 - so he does mean business! And Roger's suggestion that he grew up working hard, while some other guys are lucky - ridiculous!
Federer was always said to be a class act gentleman. Maybe because these moments are always ignored. He certainly was classier later in his career, but his bitterness really showed in moments like this.
I think Roger got a little spoiled from winning so much in the beginning of his career. To think he’d win one slam over the next five years is nuts. He was still at the top of the game, he just didn’t know how to win tight ones and got so negative.
This is a man whose ego was so far out of control at that time. He had been told repeatedly by the external world that he was the greatest to ever do it, so when he had results like this, he couldn't believe it, couldn't rationalise it. Djokovic was always more down to earth. And a better tennis player.
"Look, some players go rough and play like that, I remember loosing junior matches and they just being down 5-2 in the third and they all just start slapping shots, and they all go in for some reason, because that's the kind of way they grew up playing when they were down. I never play that way and I believe that hard work's gonna pay off kind of thing... " YOU SIMPLY CAN NOT SAY SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND BE CONSIDERED THE G.O.A.T. When did anyone hear Nole talking shit like this about everything. Even he wins 10 more GS, he will be stained with these words for the rest of his life.
Yep, not very intelligent on Roger's part. Why would you say something like that to a player that can beat you? You just gave Novak more motivation to kick your behind.
This is the guy everybody says he's humble "unlike djokovic"? Never heared novak say his opponent is lucky, or say "that guy" about anyone, so salty and he became humble after because novak humbeled him the hard way
Why can't he just say that Novak played better than him and hard work really ? I don't think he knows the difference between Serbia and Switzerland...I love Nadal and Djokovic because they are real always and they know how to appreciate opponents when they play well 👍
Hahah Federer’s mentality “oh he should leave me win this one bc I was playing better entire match ” That’s why Novak is not like other opponents(who will just give up here) Pain is realll 😂😂
I loved watching Federer play tennis but never cared much for him as a person off the court. Look at the shirt he's wearing here as well, I guess different people have different ways of coping with a loss but this was and still is one of the saltiest post-match press conferences I have seen. Djoker now on 23 slams leaving Federer at 3rd place with 20
back here after the wimbledon final '19 - roger took the loss so much better today, here he really is a bit salty. it wasn't a 'lucky shot' by novak or any ace to save MPs is a 'lucky shot' too
Federer has learned a little humility since then. He seldom gave anyone who beat him between 2004 and 2011 their credit and used to get incredibly smarmy and cutting with his comments. Although I adore him as a player and sporting phenomenon, I've always been a little annoyed at how easily people swallowed the idea that he was always a gentleman and a kind-spirited player. He lacked class quite a few times back then.
Guys, he hasn't learned humility, he is acting Humility... This is his true face unfortunatly... Ask anybody here in Balkans. We told that he was like this from the start. But I guess people are stupid enough to don't see his saltiness or we who told that he is really like that in person are very smart. Idk... At least he shows a little empathy and humility now. Not bad.
Oh, the incredible wonders of a single tight slap! It completely shattered his indomitable spirit to ever engage in a battle again. That one traumatic incident left him forever incapacitated.
The irony is that Novak would go on to hit that same winner over and over again in critical moments of grand slams for the rest of his career. That's called skill, confidence, and hard work, Roger.
I suppose that Roger get the lesson.🤫🤫🤫
Thats known as “Nothing to lose” so player is relaxed free for fear its pure essence of freedom of skill.
@@fortitude1208 nothing to lose? He has everything to lose, the chip is at stake, something that he has worked for all his life. I think he inside and outside is diferent story. Inside he is calm and thinks about his next move (shot). So he wasnt desperate here.
Nole Goat
Now he knows that. Novak taught him a lesson with this match
Forever known as "The Salty Conference"....
Jeff Gachihi haha for real....he wanted to cry
@@Yae_Yae_ worse, for that he's tryin' to hide it.
maybe sour
Still entertaining tho
3 times in his career Novak saved 40-15 lead from Federer on match points and all on grand slams. This just gets more satisfying to watch over time☺️
Ofcourse! In a jobless loser life like yours, what else could be anyway satisfying 😂
Wimbeldon is the sweetest
I agree, this interview gets sweeter every year🤣
Was one of them on Nole's serve? Two were 100% insane saves for sure.
Can you mention the three Times?
How does he keep winning the sportsmanship award (including that year)? His fans are right, he truly is a magician.
XD XD XD
buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurn !!!
How is calling a terrible (and lucky) shot on match point after the fact in a press conference poor "sportsmanship"? Only if calling a spade a spade is poor sportsmanship.
@Crooked Nose You have a 68 IQ (and a crooked nose). Suck on that.
@@lucasc3651 Why was it a "terrible (and lucky) shot"? Because Federer was the one losing the point? If Federer hit that shot you would be praising him for coming up with a magical return winner is such a important situation. Federer's whole game consists of slapping winners off both wings, but when Djokovic is the one that decides to up his aggressiveness it is a poor way to play? Still so salty after all these years...
What about now? He still plays like that? You still losing two match points?
I think it is the 3rd time now in grand slams djoko won over federer by saving match points.
Quoting Ekaterina Makarova's response when the sorest loser in women tennis Wozniacki claimed that she was lucky but won't go far during last year's Wimbledon "Yeah, maybe I was lucky today. Good for me". Sadly, both Federer and Wozniacki are always glorified as well-liked, very popular, and genuine by the media.
Why cant federer just do the underarm serve on matchpoints.... godamnit
@Josh Lum Classy.
This moment is realy important in tennis history, this is when Roger realized Novak is gonna be a real problem, 10 years later he has every major record better than Federer.
Lo cambió todo
Except wimbledon but will even with federer 2023 with 8 titles
Haha federer fanboy you forgot..djokovic is stil peaking at age of 36...eat that
Why so salty... Take it easy everyone.।
Wow yeah. Well said. I was thinking the same thing. It's the moment Roger realised he might not retire as the greatest
And Djokovic is still portrayed as the villain and arrogant one.
couldnt agree with you more
I am not european or american so I don't get the media hates towards Djokovic. Is it because he is Serbian (east european)?
@@IwanSetiawan-dv1wl I think the main reason is because since Nadal and Federer had come up before Djokovic, everyone either cheered for Roger or Rafa. So when Djokovic started beating both of them everybody was mad because they only wanted to see Fed and Nadal win. Also, Djokovic is way more emotional on the court. He shows his anger and tennis fans hate that.
Only a tool will not understand why Nadal and Federer are loved more than Djokovic.
@@IwanSetiawan-dv1wl it's delusional fans not being able to cope with the thought that someone who's not their idol could be so successful in the same sport and win all the big titles. Fedal fans hate Novak because he trashes their idols, it has very little to do with where he is from (and I say that as a Serb)
2:04 "It could be worse, could be a final".. Be careful what you say, Roger... Cause it just happened. And on Wimbeldon... The SAME shot... An even bigger match... Bigger crowd, bigger occasion... The Longest Wimbeldon Final in History... So learn to appreciate and respect opponent. Nadal would never said such thing, he would be happy to lose in a final instead of SF.
He handled that loss so much better
@@viksinha5410 Constant losses against Novak blotted his cockyness and made him humble.
True Nadal would have withdrawn earlier to avoid facing Novak in the first place. What a coward.
I just want to say something regarding Federer that has to be said. Federer here literally sums up everything about him and all the stigma regarding his "class" and "sportsmanship".
Federer had the easiest way possible out of all tennis player. He is easily most loveable western world media darling and gold cow for making money. He was made throughout the years like that. His tennis skills are not questionable. He is still strong contender to be the GOAT, BUT!
But, as i said, he showed up in a very crucial moment in tennis history, after Agassi and Sampras, where tennis needed some new star, some new role model, some new figure to pump out those monies. He was the perfect man for it - Swiss passport, British roots, South African roots, world man from rich representative country. Everything fits perfect. Add to that his immense talent and dedication and you have perfect man or should i say - "Trophy wife".
Later, the more time went passing by, and him winning everything, the media and public went even more crazy towards him. It was everything super easy for him. He was unquestioned about anything. They LOVED him, and they cashed in on him and he cashed it on them. This created super easy atmosphere for Federer to have "Class". How to not have class when you have everything? You have all media and public consolidating you after you lose. You have everyone just patting your back and looking after you drop out of tournament or injure yourself. He had literally EVERYTHING. More than any other tennis player ever. He was not just best tennis player ever, he was public and media icon. They cared for him, and everyone loved him.
And then Nadal happened, starts winning. And then rivalry happened - ok. But then something else happened - third person, unwanted person enters the game. He wants to prove himself, he wants to win, he wants to be the best (as everyone else). This totally ruined the concept. Everything that was easy and in favor to Federer was the opposite for Djokovic.
Here Federer reveals his "class", this is just a tiny glimpse of his anger and frustration when he realized he is flawed, his facade starting to peel off. This is the exact point of all the stigma that is floating around Federer everywhere. He is just a salty player who cannot cope that better defeated him, and in what way? He risked whole tournament based on that return. And Federer cannot understand that? That is because Federer didn't have to do it, he was always in safe mode, playing his best level of tennis, but that's it, never needing to prove someone something. Which both Nadal and Djokovic had to do (Djokovic the most out of all three).
This is really sad, i wish this conference would be shown to everyone everywhere all the time, just for the sake of it. For masks to fall down, and then to judge these three tennis players only on real facts. This is not class. It's easy to have class that way. The class is to have almost everyone against you, watching your every move and mistake, crashing on you, while you keep winning and praise others. Djokovic never disputed Federer, and never disputed Nadal, despite everything. In my opinion Djoko showed class more than any other player. Time will tell.
I like your post but I don't think Djokovic has shown more class than Nadal. I'd say Nadal has shown more class than Djokovic.
TRUTH.
@@JohnnyRugged06 Really? When Novak won 20th GS, he said at the trophy presentation that he is there because of Fed and Nadal. When he beat Nadal at 2021 RG he said "it is a privilege to share the court with him." Not to mention everything else. When did Nadal show something like that, apart from showing zero camaraderie in Novak's worst lifetime situation, when even Kyrgios showed support? Nadal class...come on.
a great comment. At least Federer matured a bit 8 years later, when even more painful loss happened, and behaved much better. But this is who he really was then. A western media created golden cow that herds of sad souls wanted to identify with. Actually, a salty man.
Sir, this is one of the Best comments i've ever read. Thanks.
honsetly... shit house sportsmanship. Novak would have been so much more gracious in defeat. Miracle forehand best shot ever.
When Federer wins, it is hardwork, when others win, it is luck
What a joke
He was still getting used to the idea of a big 3 not big 2 so let’s give him a slight break haha, but yeah he was SALTY
No, Federer has been lucky before
If Federer was the one who’d hit a forehand return like that on match point down, I’m sure he would have said he was lucky.
@@severinrisan9006 Oh and he has said he was lucky after winning matches like this. He said that after US Open 2014 vs Monfils, Wimbledon 2009 vs Roddick, AO 2020 vs Millman, AO 2020 vs Sandgren, etc.
Get him some vinegar and chips; he's bringing the salt.
Loooool
His lunch from now on.
ahaha
I needed some extra salt, glad I got from Roger.
After this, regular salt taste like sugar
Roger: "It was a lucky shot, he can't do it again."
Novak at W19: "Hold my chia salad."
😂😂
Gold 🤣
😂😂
The passing shot at 40-30 ???@tomr6955
@tomr6955 That return winner on 40-15 wasn't the first time Novak hit that shot, in that match! LOL.
"I should have won." "He gets one lucky shot." I believe that hard work pays off, and I cant play like that." RF really is a sore sore loser. He has about as much grace as a 3-legged goat on an icy pond.
I’m dying over here 😂
@@BakersDozenOfficial me too :) :) :)
He should be grateful for born a few years before Nole
@@aleguitarra yeap he would have 10 slams at top...
hahahaha what a comment
- "I feel like I should be doing the other press conference."
- "...you feel like he was mentally out of it already, and just gets the lucky shot in the end."
- "Confidence, are you kidding me? Some players go up and play like that. I remember losing junior matches, when they're just being down 5-2 in the third , and they just start slapping shots and it all goes in for some reason. Because that's kinda way they grew up playing when they were down. I never play that way. I believe in that "hard work's gonna pay of" kind of thing."
So this is the biggest sportsman in tennis? So this is the classiest ever? So this is the man that will stay the GOAT whatever Nadal and Novak win until the end of their careers, because of the way he conducts himself and because of his behavour?
I think you guys picked the wrong man to put all of these superlatives.
This guy is tennis, he's 5 years older than that Djokovic clown and still in his head. He has one bad moment? Djokovic has been like this so many times and u still love him. Stfu.
@@PCTennis Djokovic never said stuff like that, that's first. About anyone. That "his shots just go in for some reason". And second, this isn't about Novak. It's Federer's press conference, I am talking about his behaviour here. Why you always compare him to Novak? All I'm saying is, he can't be considered classiest ever, and best sportsman and similar stuff with this attitude. Period. No need to bring anyone else in the talk.
Think about Roger's position here. He just lost a us open semi final to his second biggest rival after having two match points. You think he's gonna be all cheery and happy afterwards?
It was very clear in Djokovic's demeanor before that forehand winner that he was angry and did not care much anymore. As a result, he decided to slap the ball as hard as he could to see what would happen. I'm not sure how much tennis you've played in your life, but most people can relate to that feeling. Roger put it well in his example from juniors tennis. Some people get angry when they're about to lose and just start bashing balls, and sometimes it works. Seeing as how Roger personally disagrees with that type of mentality, it's obvious why he'd be a little ticked off. What exactly is your problem with his comments?
@@LzPwns First, yeah he's great, but Djokovic's a professional tennis player too. No need to drag his win down by making such comments. He was a better player, he won, accept it and get over ir. Respect your rival, accept that he just made one of the best shots in tennis history, and move on.
Second, comparing one of the biggest players at the moment to junior players in terms of mentality is wrong in so many ways, no need to explain.
Third, Djokovic played better in the end. It didn't "all go in for some reason". Problem is he can't accept that the other player was better.
Fourth, Djokovic did it three times. It wasn't just pure luck, but better mental stability and focus, down to earth mentality. And Roger knows that. He found a way to win in that situations, to overplay Roger, not just slapping balls because of anger.
Fifth, he was facing one of the best returners in the game. And not to talk about accepting that it was his geniousness to hit the return, he denies the confidence in that moment too. He denies the confidence to a man who wins when whole arena is cheering the opponent and booing him?
Sixth, even if it was understandable - but it isn't - it still isn't sportsmanship and a class act. Period.
@@95Minja 1. It looks like fed had accepted all that and was trying to move on. The reporters kept asking about that particular part of the match and fed explicitly said he accepted the loss, that its in the past, and that he is moving on.
2. What's wrong about that comparison? Many professional athletes, not just tennis players, have mentalities comparable to 16, 17, 18 year-olds. I get that he's a top level adult athlete, but that doesn't mean he's a robot. We're all human here.
3. Never said he didn't play better. And yeah, maybe fed's choice of words "all go in for some reason" is a little extra, but he wasn't trying to say all of novaks shots from that point on were "going in for some reason". He was just elaborating on his example of a bitter, angry junior player who starts slapping every ball trying to hit winners when they feel they've lost the match. I think Fed knows that's not what novak did for the rest of the fifth set. He's just saying that the return winner, which gave novak new life and sparked the comeback, did come as a result of that particular mentality. Fed almost always gives credit to those that beat him and he compliments their game. But when it was this close and he literally had the match on his racket, its tough not to feel like you should have won.
4. Djokovic is absolutely better than anyone in terms of mental stability and focus. But that particular moment where he hit the return winner was like a "screw this match, let me smash this return and if it goes in, awesome, if not, whatever". His facial expression before the return says it all.
5. Again, you're misinterpreting novaks mental state. Of course he had confidence and focus from that point on, but the reporters question was about the return winner. Careless anger, not confidence, was the overwhelming state of mind for that moment.
Sure, he wasn't being a class act here. Doesn't make his comments wrong though.
dang if novak have had the same press conference it would've been blown out of proportion, the double standard for roger is real, lost a bit of respect for roger after watching this for the first time today, he's 30 already at this point already for god's sake, a bit out of his character, or maybe this is his true character lol
U posted this 4 days ago, it's been 8 YEARS since this happened , he was unsportsmanlike here but u should know better and realize that he's way more mature now and u can easily tell
@@Gone2pluto roger was 30 here already...
@@likunyang7609 u have made that clear, I said he was being immature, but there's no need to complain about this behavior 8 years later when he clearly doesn't act the same anymore
@@Gone2pluto for him, a 10 year vet on tour, and 16 time grand slam champion at this point to not even give a young gun on the rise any credit for such a incredible match, don't you think that says a bit about the person's true color. Roger's too used to being the top dog and winning, he never learned to be more gracious and humble in defeat like rafa and nole until he actually experienced that himself the last 10 years, rafa and nole are much more mature mentally than him, at least at the same age
@@likunyang7609 yes, but he's human, and I believe for the reason that he is so successful, it was hard for him to accept defeat when he was so close to a final, but I understand what u mean, at that time, his attitude was poor
I like to watch this interview when I'm having a bad day
Every time it cheers me up 😂
I mean you are Serbian your GDP per capita is like 9000 y'all are lazy people no university studies corrupt and you massacred the Balcans in the 90s.
😂😂😂
Why
@@nabnab9Novak fans are the saltiest of em all that's why lol
Djokovic owned him. Plain and simple.
+samfisher5 He owned him yet again! Us Open 2015 baby :D
+ctt82 Yup. Dramatic night last night, but very sweet in the end!! :)
+Soham Chak All the Australian Open matches with Novak since 2008 have been 'owning'. :D
Federer never 'owns' Novak on his favourite surface (grass) either.
And not even Nadal for that matter.
Lol..look who is talking..Fognini has owned someone in 2015 :D
Still 3-2 (Fognini vs Nadal) was better than a 5-3 (Federer vs Djokovic). :P
"Should have won here, could have won there"
Roger "could have been a goat" Federer😂😂
Novax "could have been respected" DjoCovid
@@peterparker01 haha Novak is respected, and the grandpa is not the GOAT 💩
@@josb2574 Federer is forever the GOAT! & DjoCovid is just a weakest virus era clown!
@@peterparker01 well said,djokob*tch will never eve in Federer's league.
@@chiragsood4668 cope seethe dilate
Maybe I can help Roger to understand how some players can play "a shot like that on match point" ... it's called HAVING BALLS ... There you go, I hope you understand now.
Yes and no, as he said, he was not used to face match point in GS during his career, but Novak definitely was, and is to the credit of Federer that he was seldom in that situation. Is very important that observation to understand his future mental failings at GS, is ironic, but he was so dominant like no one else in the history, dispatching rivals as fast as he could in GS that obviously he just didn't give himself the opportunity to develop a strong mentality when down in the scoreboard, by contrast Nadal and Djokovic faced match points enough times in all kinds of rounds of GS (before and during their prime) to develop that mentality
I suppose its called having luck
@@martinoa1467 You can only have luck if you have balls man. If you don't have balls to try something you definitely won't have a chance to have a luck with it.
@@zy9662 He is used to facing match points in GS several times in his career especially against Rafa in FO before 2011.Not sure what you are talking about there but the excuses are laughable.
@@zy9662 The quality of the opposition wasn't like that of Nadal and later Djokovic, so it was easier for Fed to dominate. Don't even bother saying players like Gonsalez and Baghdatis were of the standard of Nadal and Djoker. By 2011 Fed should have been used to being defeated.
"Could've been worse. It could've been a final". yikesss
momentary bliss lol Wimbledon. At least he wasn’t super salty in that press conference
@@lordawesome-epicgaming2866 This was when his sense of entitlement was in full flow. After 2012, he had 5 years of not winning a major to come back down to Earth.
eeeesh! Poor Roger got oofed there
@@lordawesome-epicgaming2866 He got used to it.
Hellooooo wimbledon 2019
Federer's (well-hidden, usually) arrogance is why I think Nadal is a distinctly better sportsman. But of course Fed almost always wins the award regardless.
Well said..
Well hidden
Nadal? No... :D
Probably the awards are probably paid from his manager. They have plenty of money to buy off awards to massage his ego.
@@oerolegend Nadal, Yes
Explain the arrogance here. I don't see roger claiming "he was the better player" like injury faker jokeovic once did in a loss against Nadal when he got sent home licking the dirt off of Nadal's feet in the 2000s. Dude almost got beat up by Andy roddick in the locker room for his drama queen injury faking acts in US open 2008
Just thought of something else. Why is it when Novak makes a great shot, it's a lucky shot. When Federer makes a shot like that, he is the maestro. Why doesn't Roger just give him his do? He is playing fantastic tennis and is backing it up with win after win.
Because Novak is Serbian and doesn’t have the country club upbringing that this cocksmooch and NaDull had.
Does not matter....Djokovic is mentally out since his childhood and he is swimming 21 grandslams...hahaha
Because Djokovic will go all out and it's 50/50 whether Djokovic's shot will be brilliant. Djokovic had managed to get the 50 everytime whereas Federer does those shots basically every single match.
@@JacenSolo0you are funny
@@JacenSolo0top tier laughs
2:14 is the moment I went from being Roger Federer fan to a Novak Djokovic fan. I like people who are humble despite all achievements and not let it get in their heads.
By this time:
RF: 16
RN: 10
NJ: 3
RF thought he could just dismiss NJ 13 GS behind him thinking he himself was the GOAT. Little did he know.. Still crickets from RF after Djokovic's 23rd.
Who is NJ?
I think he meant ND 😂
You were never Fed fan
@@ochocinco9551😂😂😂😂😂
What the F**K .!? am I listening to? He's talking about the guy, who lost two tournaments that year(French Open and Cinncinati), winning everything else and beating everybody;'talks without respect/honor, "lucky shots", ... and he was the "Fairness Champion" for so many years on tour? C'mmon, ... are Y kiddin'?
sjaruj Don't dramatize. He gave him due respect. Had every reason to be this disappointed as this was the second year in a row where he had 2 match points and lost the match. He did conclude very clearly that he had only himself to blame. It's more a case of journalists asking stupid questions and rubbing it in endlessly.
+Ameya Deshpande Coz his shoulder was injured.
+sjaruj
Yeah, he is an arogant peace of shit...
+sjaruj
The Fairness Champion (or the Stefan Edberg Sportsmanship Award) is highly skewed towards top players.
None of the top 5 deserve this honour, yet they get it.
The ones who truly deserve it are guys like Tim Smycek, Andreas Seppi, Del Potro, Tsonga, Marco Baghdatis, etc.
Roger is as sulky as all professionals are, and as this video is evidence, he wasn't even good at hiding it.
(Don't forget his under-the-radar pre-2003 years, where he regularly threw racquets and tantrums)
sjaruj llllpk
Federer fans: ''Federer always win the sportmanship award becuase he is such a gentleman''.
Me: ''No Federer always wins the sportmanship award because he is the most popular player on tour and all his bad deeds are ignored.''
Awards have zero meaning and have never had. It's ALL about biases and double standards.
Djokovic is the real sprit of sportsmanship
Majestic King by spitting at the crowd? Breaking racquets when he’s losing? Calling timeouts when he’s down everytime? He’s a clown. When do you ever see Nadal say anything like this or act like an idiot on court? He’s never broke a racquet in his life. He always gives his opponent credit. Federer got pissed off because he lost 2 straight years to the same guy in the same situation, up 40-15. He’s going to be in a bad mood, but he took this a little too far. If it was me I would have said congrats to novak, job well done, and move on. Him and Nadal don’t like Djokovic’s ego because it’s a disgrace to the game of tennis. Nadal would haven’t have acted like this because he’s always positive and a good sportsman, Federer is a good sportsman most of the time, but I think where he was dominating from 03-10 he let the fame and glory get the better of him after he didn’t win a slam that year.
@@taylorpack7705 cool story bruh but both nadal and djokovic has better sportsmanship than federer.. Fed is sooo fake and its so transparent.
Majestic King djocovid real spirit of sportmanship? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAJAJAJAJAJAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAH
Roger showed his true colors in this press conference. This is the real Roger Federer - unbelieveable lack of class. He makes it seem like 1 save of match point caused Novak to go on to save another match point and then get the break back and then hold serve and then break Roger in the game after and then hold serve to win the match. Does Roger forget he double faulted? Does he forget all the lines and angles and corners Nole was finding in the points after that? Roger is a tool.
When things go his way from beginning to end (like in the USO 2007 finale against Djokovic) "me, me, me"
When they don't, "the other player got lucky"
Says it all.
@@Aldorlea when did Roger say that here. Stop crying so hard, it's nowhere near as shameless as third wheel jokeobitch literally saying "I was the better player" when he got sent home licking the clay off of Nadal's feet in a clay match against him once. Don't ever talk about "me, me, me" when a egoistic injury fskingthird wheel like jokeovic walks this earth
LOL SALTY FEDTARD HERE AS WELL...NO WORK? This is Chokerers true colours...haha cry more dude...Your idol is a very salty loser..Nole GOAT.
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 cry more puni 🤡
@@amrithyabalasubramanian6703 Nadull is pretty irrelevant outside clay
This is why Novak Djoković is the greatest of all time, and is winning his 20th grand slam tomorrow
nadal says hi
@@janicethyss6184 Novak says hi too
@K Totci will be coming back to this in a few years
@@bogdanjovicic4668 rafa will win the race
@janice thyss Hi again from Novak. Will be returning with a couple more by the end of year so watch this space. Djoker has already vested both of them.
He is kinda silly...
He and the media are trying to show him like he is the perfect man, but he shows his true face when he is losing...
It's a match between the GOAT and the Swiss.
I feel bad for you having to life in such a rotten country like Serbia...A place where everybody stinks and theres a rotten economy.
Exactly, Roger really beat himself in that match unfortunately! Well said...
@@funfor1lifecope
Swiss cheese maybe with so many holes in his matches vs Novak.
Djokovic is a true champion.Since the moment he reached the Top of ATP list,organizers started with setting up,it was well known that Djokovic won about 90% of matches against Nadal on hard court,but it was also the fact that crowd wanted to see Federer - Nadal final,so Djokovic always played with Federer in semifinals when Federer was in his best shape.Second thing,Djokovic always played against crowd.It doesn't matter if he played Wimbledon,RG,US Open or AO,crowd always supported his opponent.
And 8 years, nothing has really changed except that Novak has now definitely proven that he is, without a doubt, the best ever.
You do realize that the draw is determined by ranking, right? Djokovic 1st seed is bound to play Federer, 3rd seed, and Rafa 2nd seed is destined to meet the 4th seed, which was Andy Murray. 1 vs 3 and 2 vs 4 so the final is 1 vs 2, which is what it was, Rafa vs Novak. Was Novak being number 1 and Roger being number 3 rigged? Haha
@@IzakD8you do realize the original commenter is implying that they rigged the seeding, right? The always seeded it to where Nadal and Federer could meet in the finals
It's when he loses, which didn't happen often earlier, that you really see how "classy" Federer is. Losing to Nadal is about the only loss he could take without being rude or sullen. I'm not sure that Novak won because he "slapped one lucky shot." He contrasts the idea of 'hard work' with the way Novak plays, which, you have to admit, is pretty silly.
Maybe Novak won because he actually won 18 pts more than Federer that day.
@@Aldorlea That’s not why; Federer won 14 more points in the 2019 Wimbledon final. Novak won this match (and Wimbledon 2019) because he played the important points better.
2:04 could be worse, could be final.. hahaha who came here after Wimbledon final 2019 :)
Crooked Nose lmfao this choker is a wimp
Why is there so many retards here
Hahaha
hahahahahha
He even handled that loss better than this!
"It could be worse, it could be a final."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I never noticed that 😂 this man jinxed himself
beautiful
@@randomps2gamer283peRFect beating 😂
I think Roger can be forgiven his arrogance. Back then he did not know that he had just lost against the greatest player of all times.
I am Novak's fan.... but i stilll had respect for roger.. but gotta say after this interview i lost all the respect i had for him
Same!! I always had huge respect for him.. but the way he responded to some of those questions... wow.
I'm a fan of his, but I didn't like his arrogance when he was between his 20 and 30 years old; by the way, he changed a lot since then and he's now more gracious in defeat and balanced in his observations: why should you be fixed on this interview and not reconsider to respect him again? This interview is a silly reason to even lose respect for someone.
@@IshanPandit exactly. This "nice guy" personna is all a front. When people are down, you see their real selves
@@ermattia no it absolutely isn't. Federer has NEVER spoken out against the bias of the crowds that favour him over his opponents. Especially against Novak, crowds have been incredibly disrespectful in their matches. He never speaks out during or after the game. Out of the big 3, Federer has the worst attitude.
The most arrogant player l know... but Djokovic showed you so many times after his “ lucky “ shoot.... Go Novak👍👍👍💪💪💪
You are delusional!!
Media's power. I don't understand how this person is an example of class-act and sportsmanship lol.
It happened almost 10 years ago. I'm not justifying him, he didn't handle that loss well. But, he's an overall very nice guy and an example of class-act and sportsmanship. We all bad days. The Big 3 are great examples of class-act and sportsmanship tbh
Tbh I’m not mad that he’s an example of class-act, I’m mad that they’re trying to represent djokovic as the bad guy
Yup its all about propaganda. Western media decides who' s the hero and whos the villain
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
I don't understand why Federer explains it like the only shot that mattered was that return at 40:15. Even if that shot was pure luck, he still had 1 more match point and was still serving for the match. Even after the second match point, he was still serving at 40:40 and had a chance to finish it. If you crumble every time someone saves one match point with a lucky shot and can't progress in the match (considering even when he lost his serve, he was still leading in the match and had every chance to at least get to a tiebreak), then your criticism should be pointed at yourself.
Very well said
I wonder if he he still believes that it was pure luck, after Novak has done it time and time again in the biggest matches. I used to say that Nadal was mentally strongest player ever, but after 2014 Djokovic unlocked new heights of mental strength that even Nadal didnt reach.
non_face 2019 Wimbledon final is the best proof
IMO Roger believes anything except the fact that he isn't the "GOAT", that's why he is coming back, to enjoy the spotlight a bit further, but I see him losing in the second round of Wimbledon and going out in an embarrassing whimper made only worse by the media saying that he played "some of the best tennis ever" in that time. While Nadal Djokovic dominate the slams for the next 3/4 years, with no such coverage.
@@stevennorris7181 So what if his career ends like that? There have been so many players (male and female) whose careers end that way
Well it's more to it then that.
Nadal unlike novak also gets crowd support like fed does.
So in reality novaks mental game goes even deeper....
He's basically fighting off the crowd and the opponent most of the time unlike fed/nadal.
The most arrogant of the Big 3.
by far
He keeps saying who cares…obviously Federer cares he sounds like a cry baby….
Absolutely right!!
Not anymore, Rafa’s latest comments about Novak in an interview makes Rafa the most saltiest and arrogant now. Back at this time I agree Fed was the more arrogant over Rafa, but in recent years Roger has been complimentary towards Novak and shown him respect, unlike Rafa who is more bitter towards Novak than ever before.
@@justchillin6314Roger is the most arrogant. Nadal is the most salty.
fedfans if you wanna know what a real champion sounds like listen to nadal after he loses a match. He always concedes the other player played better, and never makes excuses. Ever
vijanatrix Well, Nadal didn't give full credit to Soderling after his upset loss at Roland Garros in 2009. Saying he didn't have his day and that he played too short, which made it easier for Soderling.
I think Nadal only phraises his rival when its Roger or Novak or some lose it didnt hurt him, but when he suffer an upset he doesnt give credit at all and talk about how bad he was playing or some physical impediment, example his loss vs gonzalez in A0 2007 he was really salty cause he wasnt expected to be trashed by a player he thought it wouldnt be a big problem, same with soderling, in rg 2009, kyrgios and brown in wimbledon, Fognini in us open, etc
Except for when Djoker beat him June 11, 2021, and he blames his injury.
Federer isn't a real champion tbh. He won most of his titles before nadal and novak burst on to the scene.
@@stevewood-park3712 he didn’t blame his injury I watched that entire press conference. He said Djokovic played really well and it wasn’t his day. “I know I can’t win 20 RG” is what he said sooner or later he’s going to be beat there, nobody is invincible, especially out of his prime.
: He replies to a question with : "Are you serious?" at 2:42. Shows just how arrogant he is.
federer is so much jealous of djokovic
2:04 Oh boy you guessed it LOL
LMAOOOOOO he predicted his own future
Fahad KM too much arrogance lmfao a pussy wimp
imagine being Federer winning 2018 AO , you’re 20th slam thinking you’ve secured the record and GOAT status for a long time only to become almost irrelevant 5 years later with 4 slams behind and all your records broken by the real GOAT😅😅😅
Novak gifted 3 GS to him 2017-2018
Here we go again! 2019! Djokovic! But i'll give respect to Roger, though he didn't back then.
But he did in 2019
"People are afraid of what they don't understand" Same goes for Federer.
BvS vibes
Well said, if that happened to me I would be in awe and applaud my opponent. Fed just wasn’t that humble like Djokovic was.
@@justchillin6314 neither was Nadal,but Novak made other mistakes,mostly on court with somewhat childish behavior,coming from a Nole fan.
@@euneadventure3112 On court behaviour is completely irrelevant to one’s personality off the court my guy. Rublev is one of the nicest players on the tour but on court he gets very animated. Djokovic was never once disrespectful to Federer while on a tennis court, never bad mouthed Federer in any post match press conferences unlike Federer who did plenty of times to Djokovic. Federer even told Djokovic’s corner to shut up once while on the court. Djokovic despite his outbursts in the past on the court and a few racket breaks, he never once directed it towards his opponent, so what you said doesn’t apply because it’s how one is in defeat that determines the true character of someone, not when in a match and having a great desire to win so they get angry sometimes. Djokovic was always humble in defeat as he was in victory unlike Fedal who were always sore losers.
"It could be worse, it could be a final"
2019 Wimbledon enters the chat
LOL
All those suckers with one finger wag
Damn. Roger is so salty when losing to Novak. Novak makes him look like a child that had his toy (trophy) stolen.
I feel bad for you having to life in such a rotten country like Serbia...A place where everybody stinks and theres a rotten economy.
He is always salty when losing
Federer showed he’s class or lack of it here Djokovic was angry at the crowd and not the fact he thought he would lose they were cheering every time he made a mistake or even double fault I’ve never seen Rafa or djoko react like this after a loss
I lost my respect to Federer after watching this interview , novak the goat 🔥🔥
One of the greatest forehands in tennis history.
He capitulated after losing match point; never recovered. Djokovic would not have done that. Nole is mentally tougher than Roger.
The most consequential forehand in tennis history for sure. And I think Djokovic also hit the most consequential backhand in tennis history, when he hit that backhand down the line in the 2019 Wimbledon final tiebreak to go up 6-3, it was the shot that guaranteed the win!
*luckiest
The glorious salt begins at 3:30... lmao
ElSpewtardo lmfao there we are 2019
It's true that none of us know what it is like to lose a grand slam semi in that fashion, so it's hard to say what is an appropriate reaction. However, we do see other top players on the tour lose devastating matches on every year and I believe it is at least a valid opinion that in this instance, Federer was a pretty shitty loser.
I like the t-shirt fed has.. His 16GS..... Novak just won his 4th
In the following 9 years fed won 4 GS
And Djokovic won 13 GS
Yepp that was lucky.
One year later, 13 became 16. :)
Mr 40-15 Chokerer. Saltier than a fifteen year old millennial. 😂
I'm 17 and I've been way saltier after losing matches; I have to admit it
@@unowen7591 I won a match similar to this one (down 5-3 AD-40 on my opponent's serve and won 7-5) and my opponent was pretty salty about it. He very abruptly shook my hand with his head down. But could I blame him? I should have lost that match.
@@unowen7591 Yeah, people call him a sore loser but are here commenting on a press conference 10 years ago lol. Just let it go (and that was one of the matches I celebrated the most in my life).
@@unowen7591 funny if djokovic had acted this way this would be plastered all the media. People would be calling him classless and hating hard. But since its roger, its ok, its normal!
@@unowen7591
No novak would definitely not act this way lol.
He always credits his opponents no matter what.
Rog is not a gentleman everyone thinks he is apparently.
The double standards is laughable and disgraceful in tennis.
I'll gladly be done with it when novak and rafa retire.
Legend has it Djokovic broke Fed's 311 weeks at top of the ATP ranking and Fed claims Djokovic is lucky.
Lol 334 weeks & counting!
😂350+ weeks counting I think he gets to 400 weeks guaranteed easily
@@ThisIsHarun sad he didnt play AO..would be 400 haha
@@BogdanPW641 370+ lol
@@rishitdasgupta2433 yea hahahaha.But now Wimbeldon set him up.Points from wimbeldon will not count and Novak won last year so he losing 2 000 points.Propaganda will try everything to stop goat
Would love to see Roger's face when Novak gets 21 slams. ha ha ha
18 now !
even nadal will have more, at the end he will be worse our of three
@@lasergame33.. Getting closer! Wimbledon and US Open are favorites for Novak if he can stay healthy.
@@commandmaster7101 True, Nadal and Djoker will battle it out for who will have most grand slams. Roger will be 3rd in that race.
he has already owned 19 slams now, waiting for 20th one and roger's attitude
Now imagine the opposite situation: Djokovic loses to Federer and gives the exact same answers as Roger in press conference. He would have got crucified. Federer looks absolutely arrogant and classless here.
He was revered as the perfection of tennis at this time. I wonder how he felt watching his 2 peers surpass everything he achieved.
novak>roger>nadal
It so sad.. This was the moment he realised Novak will take away all his records, titles and leave him eating dust.
A guy who does not know to loose like a man.
Goran Marinic I mean, he was pretty good on Sunday.
@@alexmeechan15 he learnt it was normal for him to choke at 40-15, not luck, so he wasn't as mad. Winning match points at wimbledon and us open with crowd on your side? No, no its not possible for Choker Federer. Choking in big finals against rivals and having the worst H2H record? Yes!
I feel bad for you having to life in such a rotten country like Serbia...A place where everybody stinks and theres a rotten economy.
@@RD-kh3xt The crowd being on your side is more pressure-filled than the opposite.
Today, as Novak Goatkovic stands on the top of the mountain alone as the undisputed Greatest Mens’ Tennis Player of All Time, I come to watch this jealous petty so-called classiest player of the game calling Novak’s unplayable winners as lucky, with a sense of overflowing joy and happiness. I love how he still keeps the grudge to this day of how Goatkovic beat him again and again after this piece of drivel and he never ever could admit Goatkovic’s greatness. Nadal congratulated him straightaway for the greatest achievement of record breaking 23 GS but this jealous self-centred man still doesn’t have the decency to complement his colleague even today. And still Goatkovic has the sheer sportsmanship of stating that Fedal made him what he is today.
Absolutely beautiful. Waited however long to be able to come to this video to declare that, even on the day that Novak stands on top of the mountain, Federer is still the most important thing to you. I will say it for the umpteenth time: Novak fandom is NOTHING without Federer. All of your feelings, your admiration, and your devotion to Novak is driven by Federer. No more proof needed than your desire for his recognition and validation of your hero. Even with 23 slams, Novak alone is not enough for you.
same as me, this was bound to happen, especially because of this interview and the one from AO 2009 as well.
@@flyingsaucer8199Right, cat were not cat if there were no rat.
@@flyingsaucer8199 And Federer's fandom is nothing but EGOist, jealousy driven and full of inferiority complex. The two great adversaries in his time and he could not beat either of them.
@@mayank7568 Dear oh dear. Pitiful levels of projection. At least write words that you, yourself, believe.
You can't have it both ways! You can't fall down and worship at the feet of Federer for his "classiness" and then make excuses when he comes off as a pompous ass because he lost! It's easy to be "humble" when you've been so rarely humbled. What's more is he tried to diminish Djokovic's win. Tennis is a sport where it's about whom wins the final point, not whom played the better tennis on the whole in the match. You take the good with the bad. I lost respect for Federer here not because he is human, but because he and the media play into that pseudo "classy" persona. And excuse his often bitchy and snippy attitude with backhanded compliments and barbs continually at the expense of his opponents. Justified in the media because he is, FEDERER. Period!
This was one press conference, where he was speaking just minutes after losing one of the most devastating matches of his career. It was also the match that left him Slamless in a season for the first time since 2002. By all accounts of those that know him, Federer is one of the classiest guys on tour. He was not the classiest guy here, no - he could have worded things a little bit differently - but he clearly was not in a frame of mind to speak eloquently about the way things went less than half an hour after his collapse on court, especially when the match meant that much to him.
And by the way, the media makes him out to be classy because that is all we have heard from everybody who has ever known him.
Kyle Johansen even as fed fan i feel doing this press conference is one of the most stupid things roger did no way was he gonna be objective about what happened in the match. especially when it happened the year before . He should have pulled a Sir Alex Ferguson and refused to do the interview and pay a fine there was no way 30 minutes after losing like that your gonna give the other guy his due credit the pain was still so raw.
TheSupinesmokey13
Perhaps. However, given who he is, he always feels an obligation to answer the media.
The best comment here.
TheSupinesmokey13 And the journalists kept rubbing it in with stupid questions...
"Novak he was totally mentally out of it - I should have won!". So - if he was mentally out of it, how come he saved 2 match points and went to win the last 4 games of the match. Novak is a giant, in a way that Roger will never be. He's a truly all-round great person, enjoys life, connects well with the crowd, humourous, relaxed - but let's not forget that he is also #1 - so he does mean business! And Roger's suggestion that he grew up working hard, while some other guys are lucky - ridiculous!
Novak figured out how to beat Nadal, keep giving him backhands. While Federer could not figure that out. That's why Novak is a true champion.
WERE YOU LIVING UNDER A ROCK IN 2017? Or WIMBLEDON SF 2019?
@@sidtrip1 that comment was 9 years ago lol
@@edwin9867 9 years ago and he already knew how Novak beats Rafa.
@@sidtrip1 bruh.
@@sidtrip1 why are you criticizing a 9 year old comment?!
maybe he's not even alive anymore
2019 Wimbledon final? - double luck? Go to hell Federer
You forgot us open 2010
"it could be worse, it could be in a final"... Oh sweety... 😢
WHY SO MEAN??🤣😝😂
Federer was always said to be a class act gentleman. Maybe because these moments are always ignored. He certainly was classier later in his career, but his bitterness really showed in moments like this.
I think Roger got a little spoiled from winning so much in the beginning of his career. To think he’d win one slam over the next five years is nuts. He was still at the top of the game, he just didn’t know how to win tight ones and got so negative.
"confidence are you kiddin me ..please"... a little bitter are we Roger ???
Legend says If you type 40 15 in the search bar, you will see the GOAT.
lol
This is a man whose ego was so far out of control at that time. He had been told repeatedly by the external world that he was the greatest to ever do it, so when he had results like this, he couldn't believe it, couldn't rationalise it. Djokovic was always more down to earth. And a better tennis player.
"Look, some players go rough and play like that, I remember loosing junior matches and they just being down 5-2 in the third and they all just start slapping shots, and they all go in for some reason, because that's the kind of way they grew up playing when they were down. I never play that way and I believe that hard work's gonna pay off kind of thing... " YOU SIMPLY CAN NOT SAY SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND BE CONSIDERED THE G.O.A.T. When did anyone hear Nole talking shit like this about everything. Even he wins 10 more GS, he will be stained with these words for the rest of his life.
Yep, not very intelligent on Roger's part. Why would you say something like that to a player that can beat you? You just gave Novak more motivation to kick your behind.
This is the guy everybody says he's humble "unlike djokovic"? Never heared novak say his opponent is lucky, or say "that guy" about anyone, so salty and he became humble after because novak humbeled him the hard way
R u not entertained!!!!!!???
Novak gladiator!!!
Federer is a gentleman ???
Roger is so salty that he's dehydrated lol
Roger did not believe at this point, that Djokovic will destroy him in the years to come...
How salty can you be?
Federer: Yes
Federer really was insufferable at times between 2008 and 2012.
ladies & gentlemen: ROGER FEDERER
"a great ambassador for the sport of tennis " :D:D
Why can't he just say that Novak played better than him and hard work really ? I don't think he knows the difference between Serbia and Switzerland...I love Nadal and Djokovic because they are real always and they know how to appreciate opponents when they play well 👍
Hahah Federer’s mentality “oh he should leave me win this one bc I was playing better entire match ”
That’s why Novak is not like other opponents(who will just give up here)
Pain is realll 😂😂
@Nabs07 I have been following Federer's career for as long as I can remember and he means more to me than anything. Thank you for your comments.
who's here after Novak wins his 18th major?
He now won his 19th
@@MadmanGoneMad2012 yeah😂
@@CringeBasedDuality 20th
@@MadmanGoneMad2012 yeah 😂 Fedal fans in shambles. see you after us open at 21.
20 and counting fellas. Roger salt keeps piling up by trucks
I loved watching Federer play tennis but never cared much for him as a person off the court.
Look at the shirt he's wearing here as well, I guess different people have different ways of coping with a loss but this was and still is one of the saltiest post-match press conferences I have seen. Djoker now on 23 slams leaving Federer at 3rd place with 20
haha yeah he is very classy when he wins.
back here after the wimbledon final '19 - roger took the loss so much better today, here he really is a bit salty. it wasn't a 'lucky shot' by novak or any ace to save MPs is a 'lucky shot' too
Federer has learned a little humility since then. He seldom gave anyone who beat him between 2004 and 2011 their credit and used to get incredibly smarmy and cutting with his comments. Although I adore him as a player and sporting phenomenon, I've always been a little annoyed at how easily people swallowed the idea that he was always a gentleman and a kind-spirited player. He lacked class quite a few times back then.
Federer is a lot more likeable now. I really wasn’t a big fan of him during this period.
@@alexmeechan15 Because he wasn't used to lose before 2008. Rafa and Novak taught him humility
Théo Becquet I don’t disagree with that at all
Guys, he hasn't learned humility, he is acting Humility... This is his true face unfortunatly... Ask anybody here in Balkans. We told that he was like this from the start. But I guess people are stupid enough to don't see his saltiness or we who told that he is really like that in person are very smart. Idk... At least he shows a little empathy and humility now. Not bad.
Djokovic=GOAT
Federe=SOAT saltiest of all time
Guys forgive him for he didn't know he was competing with the real 🐐!
Hahaha right! Also it is normal to be disappointed right after such a loss. They shouldn't judge him for that.
I am an alien, who just came to earth. Who is this guy talking nonsense about the 22-time GS winner and 377 weeks of no 1 ranked tennis player?
Mr Alien please research the history between these two and you will understand why he said that about the GOAT
Oh, the incredible wonders of a single tight slap! It completely shattered his indomitable spirit to ever engage in a battle again. That one traumatic incident left him forever incapacitated.
I really don’t get how this guy has the most fans . Great marketing I guess.
What do you mean? I mean, he is really beloved for how he plays tennis and charisma.
My boy salty af
The press brought the chips - Federer brought THE SALT!!!
the like-dislike ratio makes me sooo proud
As a Djokovic fan I like to come back here every once in a while
I think Djokovic will be the GOAT after they have all retired . maybe 22-21
lol
@@zafferung4440 17 and counting, at the very least Rafa will overtake roger. I think rafa and nole may end up on the same number, 22.
@@bayernsa 18 !!
I think 24 djokovic ( 12 AO )
22 nadal ( 15 RG )
20 federer ( 8 Wim loool)
@@zafferung4440 lol hehehe 20 & counting
Hahaha nadal already has 22