Bantu is not an ethnic group but a language group spoken by various African ethnic groups who are genetically and culturally unique from each other. My people migrated from North East and Central Africa.
@MALEECKSWIFE29 Bantu is not an ethnic group. And you wrong, E1B1A is predominantly found in West Africa and moderately found in Southern Africa where I'm from. Same as E1B1B, which is predominantly found in the horn of Africa and moderately found in North Africa and moderately in Southern Africa. The genetic marker predominantly found in Southern Africa was formed in the green Sahara.
Bantus are not a single ethnic group, They are an umbrella term to athe diverse group of 900+ ethnicities and languages which have similarities hence the Bantu
@simpleafricanhistory bantu was a term coined by a German linguist in 1895 at the height of colonial racism. It has derogatory connotations in South Africa as it was primarily used derogatorily by apartheid regime. Bantu is not a race or ethnicity.
@MALEECKSWIFE29 you are absolutely mislead. E1B1a is a haplogroup and is not exclusive to a language grouping. Moreover, all tribes grouped into the Bantu language grouping don't have E1b1a. This is one of the lies genetic testing companies try to push.
3 things: (mostly for the algo gods) 1. Awesome brief video and awesome animation. Glad to have found your channel! 2. Wow these comments are wild 3. Are people really expecting a super nuanced retelling of an entire continent's history from an 8 minute video when you basically imply that your channel oversimplifies things for a wider audience and getting mad that you didn't add enough nuance for their particular group's mentioning? That's a lol. Anyway, thanks for the vid! Looking forward to checking out more
Thank you so much, am glad you liked it … and yes ! My videos are designed to give an overall view only (not detailed… I can’t animate all that lol), cause there aren’t much channels dedicated to African history…
Some people in the comments are quite ignorant. Abantu is a name common among the languages within the Bantu group. Hence it's used a label. Bantu peoples share genetic and linguistic relations and are the biggest people group in Africa. They are not one tribe nor they were ever. Thanks for the video🙏
they have common ancestral group, like the germanic speaking English & Dutch, are their language and culture different, yes, but both have a common origin.
Sorry you're wrong. Vast majority of the so-called "Bantus" don't even use the "Abantu" name (or the ntu sound), at all. For example in East Africa where I come from, virtually all the Bantus use /abandu/ NOT /abantu/ - see the difference between *_d_* and *_t_* . Anyone with functioning functioning ears and eyes know sounds *_ndu_* and *_ntu_* are NOT the same. Tribes like the Shona even use "munhu" and "vanhu". Again, sounds *_nhu_* and *_ntu_* are NOT the same. Some of you are so loud on this topic about Bantu but know very little about it
@@romanussaal712 So what's your point? 🤔 You can't say all Bantus migrated from one place (meaning they're all one giant ethnicity) then -- in the same sentence -- proceed to mention iSizulu and iSixhosa as two separate ethnic languages. Those two arguments are contradictory. Go make up your mind -- are Bantus an ethnicity or not? This is supposed to be a Linguistics topic, NOT migration history.
This is a more balanced telling of the story. I appreciate that you touched on the fact that "Bantu" is used as a language grouping, but personally I would have done more to stress that there is no tribe named Bantu and that it is a misappropriated word.
@@therealfootballanalystftb6687 there was never any tribe called Bantu. There were tribes that referred to all people as Bantu. Also you must acknowledge that tribes referred to as Bantu, because of similarities in languages. Not all these tribes were one, nor do they all come from the same place. Languages spread many ways, from trade to conquest.
Khoekhoe got pastoralism from south cushites who migrated from the horn of Africa, I believe originally they would of been hunter gatherer before this interaction.
In truth, fact, honesty, and bluntness in terms of technology within Southern African Countries in overall tools, weaponry, dispenseries etc it went Bantus>Xhosas>Khois>Sans in that order in ancient and midieval clockers yeah.
This is disappointing, how is it that our history doesn't go through the same academic rigour and intellectualism as other histories. The colonial project is still alive and well I see
@@macavalli2619 I think he means how we talk about the pre-Roman contact Germans, who didn't write anything down. The Celts who didn't write anything down. Even the Yamnaya who wrote nothing down. We know about those groups. What guys don't want to read? How would you know what we do?
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 check the literacy rates. Black SAns are 80% of the population but are 90% of the folks who can't read. There's even schools in KZN (a very diverse state, apparently) where 4th grade students CANT READ 😂
Khoisan are the indigenous Southern Africans, have you seen the latest study which came out this year? Geneticists sampled ancient 10,000 year old remains from South Africa, Oakhurst Rockshelter. The examined population had a strong genetic continuity with the San and Khoe. The later advent of pastoralism and farming groups in the last 2,000 years would transform the genepool of most parts of Southern Africa, but many Khoisan preserve, and are identical to the genetic signature of the older hunter-gatherers. '9,000 years of genetic continuity in southernmost Africa demonstrated at Oakhurst rockshelter' - 2024
please note in south africa there are white people who still deny that they came and saw bantu people and took their land by force even they whites some of them now claim to be related to the san and khoi yet all bantu people in the south have bantu languages thst are mixed with khoi and san that is why theirs are different from central africa. If they find a bantu skeleton that is more than 4 000 years old they try to deny how it got there even say maybe it flowed by the sea or river so I would not jump into that until Europeans give back the land.To this day they dont like bantu people because bantu people resist them completly unlike the san and khoi who no longer speak that languages while bantu people still speak bantu languages and even a bit of khoi but koi people speak english and africans as home languages and maybe we can say they are a bit behind in self actualizing and hoping they get there.If you have never been to south africa this is what is happening now
@@vanhuvanhuvese2738 Bantus were in other parts of South Africa already, just not residing in the Western Cape or other arid/dry regions as they are historically farmers who need dense vegetation for growing their crops.
Bantu are related to the last expansion of the E1b1 haplotype (the same base that went in ancient Egypt, Ancient levant, ancient Europe...). They had to conquer tropical forest and wild animals probably due to the demographic expansion and mutation in the land which they have had already conquered such as eastern Europe, Levant, India...
I don't think there has been an accurate study of the reason why the Khoi and San despite being the same ethnic group 'Khoisan' or Kwe Xam lived a slightly different lives. It could be that the Khoi have been influenced by other nation which is explains why they were pastoralist compared to the San who remained hunter and gatherers.
These languages are all related but the word bantu was just basic vocabulary and was never an identity until Europeans invented it i.e. one Wilhelm Bleek. Go to a peer reviewed journal, search Bantu and tell me why 99% of the papers are written by whites from the USA and all over Europe and not black Africans.🤔 Not a single one of the 500+ "Bantu" tribes oral history says they migrated from Nigeria or Cameroon. In fact the ones in those regions often recall that they came from the East or North. Most modern day West Africans are recent arrivals from the Sahelian Neolithic era onwards according to our current evidence. The next question is if "proto-Bantus" migrated from West Africa, where were they before then? Human history is vast, notice how they never go back to the Green Sahara or the the Savannah Pastoral neolithic? It's a deliberate agenda to and makes a lot more sense now that i've been reading a lot more old European literature on African history and African people. Same with the notion of sub-saharan Africa. But that's a story for another day... Whatever the case we should never let foreigners re-write our history or define who we are.
Yes, bantu was a basic vocabulary *BUT* only among the Southern "Bantus", mostly Zulus and Xhosas. No one else uses it in the rest of Africa, and that's why this whole Bantu theory is false. The rest of your argument is spot-on 💯
@@tomatosoup6440 You are right in fact most early 'Bantuists' began their work or expeditions in South Africa, this also includes the majority of missionaries and 'explorers' who contributed to the invention of this theory. However, variations of the words Bantu/Muntu and other overlapping vocabulary are far more widespread than Southern Africa, but extends to Central and Eastern Africa too. Certainly not West Africa though.
@@user-vw6bk4pb4l Let me repeat this statement: I'm from East Africa and the vast majority of the so-called "Bantu languages" there *DO NOT* use the word /bantu/ or suffix *_ntu_* at all . Rather, vast majority of Central and East African "Bantus" use *_ndu_* . The only language with something close to /bantu/ is Swahili which uses /mtu/, but Swahili borrows more vocabulary from Arabic than any African language and -- more importantly -- didn't originate from any specific African ethnicity, therefore it's not part of Bantu languages
It’s the word which is found in all central and southern part of the African languages which means “People or person” the languages are pretty much related
@@simpleafricanhistorynot only central and south Africa,but bantu tribes are all over Tanzania Uganda and Kenya,those countries can be found on East Africa
@@simpleafricanhistory Wait...WHAT? Please stop lying. The word /Bantu/ is not universal in "all central and southern part of the African languages" 🤭🤭 You're wrong and absurd. Even the so-called "Bantu languages", the word /Bantu/ doesn't appear in all of them. *The only defining feature of the Bantu languages is the use of suffixes - ntu/ntu/ndu/nhu - in words that refer to a human being* . That's it! Please don't make videos about things you don't even understand
You left out an important detail, _that the whole Bantu theory was invented by _*_Wilhem Bleek_*_ , a Dutch refugee from Netherlands (in Europe), before he and his folk began stealing land in Southern Africa_ . Your whole video is false anyway
Stealing land? Land wasnt owned back then lmao. Most of it was open fields anyway. Of course they did make contact with tribes. Some ended up hostile interactions, others didnt...
Yes I am , l am passionate about African history and that why I am dedicating this channel to people who are as passionate as I am want to learn. If you don’t like history I guess you don’t belong in this community.
@@simpleafricanhistory passionate about dividing the people? Why don't you talk about those who came and exterminate the same khoi-san, Zulu, vaVhenda, Tswana, Xhosa etc for their land and animals? Or you just drive your narrative to break western Cape away from Africa?
Through intermarriage and trade xhosa also share words with Tanzanians and Malawians and Congolese and even culture too.we suppose to observe history not hate it or use it to each other
Pls if your story that talks about San starts by sayn they were Hunter gatherers than don't talk about San or Khoi people because you don't know our story.
They literally were hunter gatheres. You can physically go check and have a look at caves for example in Mossel Bay in caves. They hunter fish, shellfish and other small animals including dassies for survival. Its simply a fact.
@@GTRKT-qr5sf Ask the Anunaki Gods why they call San people their Ancestors,Europeans tried to exterminate Khoisan people genocides,Massacres and they mock my people with a movie called GODS MUST BE CRAZY,we are not crazy and we are not Gods,we are Beyonder race,Ancestors of God race,our 5th San King created the Anunaki race/Rizkians in Planet Jomon,our homeland in this universe,my people originated in the beyond a place above the Heaven,we came from Planet Jomon 3.8billion years ago,we lost the knowledge in the war of ABZU and also in the war of indus valley when Enlil Yahweh Satan GÄDREEL Yaldabaoth Shiva was fighting against Osiris Yahuah Odin Allah Tengri Brahma and he dropped nuclear weapons in Osiris kingdoms in Southern region of Africa were there are deserts the San you see on tv and in nature prefer to stay that why but some of us are from the Shaman bloodlines and it is Forbidden to give San people information until the little king Osiris Christ comes back.
Bachuana(Batswana) are not the bantus. You are distorting the history. The San( Masarwa) are a subgroup of the Batswana , that's why they look the same and share the same geolocation.
@@idrismalik3246 First of all, the word Bantu is not a Tswana name. How can we as Tswana people identify ourselves with a word that is not even in our language. The word "tswana" means break away. A group a people from northwest broke into smaller groups that identified with different clan names, totems and kings . They then called they then called themselves Batswana. Tswana people did not come from northern africa. We have an ideom that says " Maropeng gwa boelwa" , which means "one should visit where he/she came from". The Maropeng caves are known as the Cradle of humankind. There is a relation between the ideom and those caves because the God who birthed all the Tswana people called LOWE OR LOE IS BELIEVED TO HAVE RESIDED IN THOSE CAVES. It is not a coincidence that one of the earliest species closer to Humans in appearance and genetically is found in those caves.
@@GTRKT-qr5sfThe intent of some wicked people is to cause CONFUSION. The MODERN-DAY Israelis in the land of Israel are IMPOSTORS. They descended from Esau of the bible. The true Israelites had to FLEE to MANY parts of the continent of AFRICA. Yes, in certain areas, they are more concentrated. People would say that the word "Bantu" represents a blanket of totally different groups of people who are not related. However, that word ONLY PERTAINS to the SCATTERED ISRAELITES. The Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup is what is to be used to identify the Bantu people as Israelites which they are.
Amen 🙏 let The Truth be Told Brother. Not Everyone will like it,but it is what it is. Thank You for a GREAT Video. NV. South Africa 🇿🇦
Bantu is not an ethnic group but a language group spoken by various African ethnic groups who are genetically and culturally unique from each other. My people migrated from North East and Central Africa.
DNA says a different story Bantus all have e1b1a genetic marking showing all Bantu are related and from a common area
@MALEECKSWIFE29 Bantu is not an ethnic group. And you wrong, E1B1A is predominantly found in West Africa and moderately found in Southern Africa where I'm from. Same as E1B1B, which is predominantly found in the horn of Africa and moderately found in North Africa and moderately in Southern Africa. The genetic marker predominantly found in Southern Africa was formed in the green Sahara.
Bantus are not a single ethnic group, They are an umbrella term to athe diverse group of 900+ ethnicities and languages which have similarities hence the Bantu
@simpleafricanhistory bantu was a term coined by a German linguist in 1895 at the height of colonial racism. It has derogatory connotations in South Africa as it was primarily used derogatorily by apartheid regime. Bantu is not a race or ethnicity.
@MALEECKSWIFE29 you are absolutely mislead. E1B1a is a haplogroup and is not exclusive to a language grouping. Moreover, all tribes grouped into the Bantu language grouping don't have E1b1a. This is one of the lies genetic testing companies try to push.
Subscribed, and well done. I look forward to seeing more.
3 things: (mostly for the algo gods)
1. Awesome brief video and awesome animation. Glad to have found your channel!
2. Wow these comments are wild
3. Are people really expecting a super nuanced retelling of an entire continent's history from an 8 minute video when you basically imply that your channel oversimplifies things for a wider audience and getting mad that you didn't add enough nuance for their particular group's mentioning? That's a lol.
Anyway, thanks for the vid! Looking forward to checking out more
Thank you so much, am glad you liked it … and yes ! My videos are designed to give an overall view only (not detailed… I can’t animate all that lol), cause there aren’t much channels dedicated to African history…
Love your channel! I’ve been looking for well animated stories of African history. There are soo many stories to tell. I can’t wait. Subscribed!
Thank you so much!!! And yes more is coming , stay tuned
Here we go
Amazing video
Hope you enjoyed it!
Some people in the comments are quite ignorant. Abantu is a name common among the languages within the Bantu group. Hence it's used a label. Bantu peoples share genetic and linguistic relations and are the biggest people group in Africa. They are not one tribe nor they were ever. Thanks for the video🙏
they have common ancestral group, like the germanic speaking English & Dutch, are their language and culture different, yes, but both have a common origin.
Sorry you're wrong. Vast majority of the so-called "Bantus" don't even use the "Abantu" name (or the ntu sound), at all. For example in East Africa where I come from, virtually all the Bantus use /abandu/ NOT /abantu/ - see the difference between *_d_* and *_t_* . Anyone with functioning functioning ears and eyes know sounds *_ndu_* and *_ntu_* are NOT the same. Tribes like the Shona even use "munhu" and "vanhu". Again, sounds *_nhu_* and *_ntu_* are NOT the same.
Some of you are so loud on this topic about Bantu but know very little about it
Migration always changes the original Languages, cultures, profiles, status and appearances of people...
Bantu, abandu, Ubuntu, Muntu, Buntu...still exists in Isizulu, isixhosa...
@@romanussaal712 So what's your point? 🤔 You can't say all Bantus migrated from one place (meaning they're all one giant ethnicity) then -- in the same sentence -- proceed to mention iSizulu and iSixhosa as two separate ethnic languages. Those two arguments are contradictory. Go make up your mind -- are Bantus an ethnicity or not? This is supposed to be a Linguistics topic, NOT migration history.
This is a more balanced telling of the story. I appreciate that you touched on the fact that "Bantu" is used as a language grouping, but personally I would have done more to stress that there is no tribe named Bantu and that it is a misappropriated word.
Thanks for pointing that out , Bantus are not a single “tribe” it’s an umbrella term to describe various ethnicities in central and Southern Africa.
@simpleafricanhistory it use to be until it grew to large to continue being one
@@therealfootballanalystftb6687 there was never any tribe called Bantu. There were tribes that referred to all people as Bantu. Also you must acknowledge that tribes referred to as Bantu, because of similarities in languages. Not all these tribes were one, nor do they all come from the same place. Languages spread many ways, from trade to conquest.
@@alisterdirector1475they did came from one place and then dispersed during the migration. Am surprised some bantus do not know this.
@@africaine4889 which Bantu tribes are you referring to?
Thank you for this informative video ☺️.
Lovely history.
Love your video , history comes alive
Thank you so for your support, more are coming
Khoekhoe got pastoralism from south cushites who migrated from the horn of Africa, I believe originally they would of been hunter gatherer before this interaction.
Great video
Nice story
What is the source of your information and how credible is it?
The information is based on archeological and linguistics studies
@@simpleafricanhistory Just say you got the information on internet.
Thanks for the video really interesting
Thank you for watching, .working hard to upload soon !
In truth, fact, honesty, and bluntness in terms of technology within Southern African Countries in overall tools, weaponry, dispenseries etc it went Bantus>Xhosas>Khois>Sans in that order in ancient and midieval clockers yeah.
the xhosa are a bantu group
I don't understand you @matthewmann what are you saying?
@@samkelombambo916I am talking about advancement and updating of technology such as tools and weapons as well as armor yeah.
Thanks for the video really great keep uploading
Thanks, will do!
This is disappointing, how is it that our history doesn't go through the same academic rigour and intellectualism as other histories. The colonial project is still alive and well I see
Well if you notice other people wrote things down... like how Jews wrote the Torah. even today you guys don't want to read blame yourself
@@macavalli2619 I think he means how we talk about the pre-Roman contact Germans, who didn't write anything down. The Celts who didn't write anything down. Even the Yamnaya who wrote nothing down. We know about those groups. What guys don't want to read? How would you know what we do?
I'm guessing you probably have no evidence for your own purported theory
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 check the literacy rates. Black SAns are 80% of the population but are 90% of the folks who can't read. There's even schools in KZN (a very diverse state, apparently) where 4th grade students CANT READ 😂
@@pureone8350 I do.
This is interesting 😮
Khoisan are the indigenous Southern Africans, have you seen the latest study which came out this year?
Geneticists sampled ancient 10,000 year old remains from South Africa, Oakhurst Rockshelter. The examined population had a strong genetic continuity with the San and Khoe. The later advent of pastoralism and farming groups in the last 2,000 years would transform the genepool of most parts of Southern Africa, but many Khoisan preserve, and are identical to the genetic signature of the older hunter-gatherers.
'9,000 years of genetic continuity in southernmost Africa demonstrated at Oakhurst rockshelter' - 2024
please note in south africa there are white people who still deny that they came and saw bantu people and took their land by force even they whites some of them now claim to be related to the san and khoi yet all bantu people in the south have bantu languages thst are mixed with khoi and san that is why theirs are different from central africa. If they find a bantu skeleton that is more than 4 000 years old they try to deny how it got there even say maybe it flowed by the sea or river so I would not jump into that until Europeans give back the land.To this day they dont like bantu people because bantu people resist them completly unlike the san and khoi who no longer speak that languages while bantu people still speak bantu languages and even a bit of khoi but koi people speak english and africans as home languages and maybe we can say they are a bit behind in self actualizing and hoping they get there.If you have never been to south africa this is what is happening now
@@vanhuvanhuvese2738 Bantus were in other parts of South Africa already, just not residing in the Western Cape or other arid/dry regions as they are historically farmers who need dense vegetation for growing their crops.
Bantu are related to the last expansion of the E1b1 haplotype (the same base that went in ancient Egypt, Ancient levant, ancient Europe...). They had to conquer tropical forest and wild animals probably due to the demographic expansion and mutation in the land which they have had already conquered such as eastern Europe, Levant, India...
I don't think there has been an accurate study of the reason why the Khoi and San despite being the same ethnic group 'Khoisan' or Kwe Xam lived a slightly different lives. It could be that the Khoi have been influenced by other nation which is explains why they were pastoralist compared to the San who remained hunter and gatherers.
These languages are all related but the word bantu was just basic vocabulary and was never an identity until Europeans invented it i.e. one Wilhelm Bleek. Go to a peer reviewed journal, search Bantu and tell me why 99% of the papers are written by whites from the USA and all over Europe and not black Africans.🤔
Not a single one of the 500+ "Bantu" tribes oral history says they migrated from Nigeria or Cameroon. In fact the ones in those regions often recall that they came from the East or North. Most modern day West Africans are recent arrivals from the Sahelian Neolithic era onwards according to our current evidence.
The next question is if "proto-Bantus" migrated from West Africa, where were they before then? Human history is vast, notice how they never go back to the Green Sahara or the the Savannah Pastoral neolithic? It's a deliberate agenda to and makes a lot more sense now that i've been reading a lot more old European literature on African history and African people. Same with the notion of sub-saharan Africa.
But that's a story for another day... Whatever the case we should never let foreigners re-write our history or define who we are.
Yet African people will believe these lies written European racist colonizers
Yes, bantu was a basic vocabulary *BUT* only among the Southern "Bantus", mostly Zulus and Xhosas. No one else uses it in the rest of Africa, and that's why this whole Bantu theory is false. The rest of your argument is spot-on 💯
@@tomatosoup6440 You are right in fact most early 'Bantuists' began their work or expeditions in South Africa, this also includes the majority of missionaries and 'explorers' who contributed to the invention of this theory.
However, variations of the words Bantu/Muntu and other overlapping vocabulary are far more widespread than Southern Africa, but extends to Central and Eastern Africa too. Certainly not West Africa though.
@@user-vw6bk4pb4l Let me repeat this statement: I'm from East Africa and the vast majority of the so-called "Bantu languages" there *DO NOT* use the word /bantu/ or suffix *_ntu_* at all . Rather, vast majority of Central and East African "Bantus" use *_ndu_* . The only language with something close to /bantu/ is Swahili which uses /mtu/, but Swahili borrows more vocabulary from Arabic than any African language and -- more importantly -- didn't originate from any specific African ethnicity, therefore it's not part of Bantu languages
@@tomatosoup6440The word Bantu is almost exclusively Southern Bantu. The only other language with that word is the language of Rwanda and Burundi.
Isn't the praying mantis also highly regarded in somewhere inasia...
Wher do u take this word Bantu from??
It’s the word which is found in all central and southern part of the African languages which means “People or person” the languages are pretty much related
@@simpleafricanhistorynot only central and south Africa,but bantu tribes are all over Tanzania Uganda and Kenya,those countries can be found on East Africa
Yes that is correct 💯
@@simpleafricanhistory Wait...WHAT? Please stop lying. The word /Bantu/ is not universal in "all central and southern part of the African languages" 🤭🤭 You're wrong and absurd. Even the so-called "Bantu languages", the word /Bantu/ doesn't appear in all of them.
*The only defining feature of the Bantu languages is the use of suffixes - ntu/ntu/ndu/nhu - in words that refer to a human being* . That's it! Please don't make videos about things you don't even understand
Have you never heard of it??🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
So this is all told by who?
Who are u Sir?
Many Bantu groups also practiced circumcision and not all of them practiced women circumcision.
I have never come across or heard of a bantu group that practices women circumcision. I am bantu who has lived with different bantu tribes.
@@EstaJeanette-nk7fj there are some mainly in the East.
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 what are the ethnic groups that do that. I am from east and central Africa and I have never heard of that.
@@EstaJeanette-nk7fj I'll look it up. I am aware that it isn't practiced all over Africa, however I came across some that did.
the venda and basotho peoples
The original Africans NAID-MEU eastern, -MAKORIB western, Makali, Mekure, Amekiri, Ganzir.
The QOYIN: QoiQoi, QoiSAN go back from 6600bc-to- 1500s.
ullsht video... one love to all africans from 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦. our history has been distorted.
You left out an important detail, _that the whole Bantu theory was invented by _*_Wilhem Bleek_*_ , a Dutch refugee from Netherlands (in Europe), before he and his folk began stealing land in Southern Africa_ . Your whole video is false anyway
Stealing land? Land wasnt owned back then lmao. Most of it was open fields anyway. Of course they did make contact with tribes. Some ended up hostile interactions, others didnt...
@@GTRKT-qr5sf So when did land begin to be owned? You sound funny.
@@tomatosoup6440 When people claimed it when noone was there. If someone was already living on the land only then it was theirs to begin with...
@@GTRKT-qr5sf And weren't Africans already living in Africa though? 🤔
@@GTRKT-qr5sf "When noone was there" ? 🤔 Wasn't Africa already inhabited when Europeans arrived?
You are so obsessed with bantu and khoi-san people nhe! We are all black people (Africans) with almost similar traditional practices!
Yes I am , l am passionate about African history and that why I am dedicating this channel to people who are as passionate as I am want to learn. If you don’t like history I guess you don’t belong in this community.
@@simpleafricanhistory passionate about dividing the people? Why don't you talk about those who came and exterminate the same khoi-san, Zulu, vaVhenda, Tswana, Xhosa etc for their land and animals? Or you just drive your narrative to break western Cape away from Africa?
@@pauzamsiska3605 bro it's an 8 minute video... Maybe chill?
@@keanmrnam I am chill, but we won't tolerate propaganda history!
You like to seperate the Khoe Khoe and Xhosa yet they share the same genetics, and language
Through intermarriage and trade xhosa also share words with Tanzanians and Malawians and Congolese and even culture too.we suppose to observe history not hate it or use it to each other
This is colonial history
😂
No it isn't
It is colonial history how come Europeans know that
Pls if your story that talks about San starts by sayn they were Hunter gatherers than don't talk about San or Khoi people because you don't know our story.
They literally were hunter gatheres. You can physically go check and have a look at caves for example in Mossel Bay in caves. They hunter fish, shellfish and other small animals including dassies for survival. Its simply a fact.
@@GTRKT-qr5sf Ask the Anunaki Gods why they call San people their Ancestors,Europeans tried to exterminate Khoisan people genocides,Massacres and they mock my people with a movie called GODS MUST BE CRAZY,we are not crazy and we are not Gods,we are Beyonder race,Ancestors of God race,our 5th San King created the Anunaki race/Rizkians in Planet Jomon,our homeland in this universe,my people originated in the beyond a place above the Heaven,we came from Planet Jomon 3.8billion years ago,we lost the knowledge in the war of ABZU and also in the war of indus valley when Enlil Yahweh Satan GÄDREEL Yaldabaoth Shiva was fighting against Osiris Yahuah Odin Allah Tengri Brahma and he dropped nuclear weapons in Osiris kingdoms in Southern region of Africa were there are deserts the San you see on tv and in nature prefer to stay that why but some of us are from the Shaman bloodlines and it is Forbidden to give San people information until the little king Osiris Christ comes back.
Bachuana(Batswana) are not the bantus. You are distorting the history. The San( Masarwa) are a subgroup of the Batswana , that's why they look the same and share the same geolocation.
@@idrismalik3246 First of all, the word Bantu is not a Tswana name. How can we as Tswana people identify ourselves with a word that is not even in our language. The word "tswana" means break away. A group a people from northwest broke into smaller groups that identified with different clan names, totems and kings . They then called they then called themselves Batswana. Tswana people did not come from northern africa. We have an ideom that says " Maropeng gwa boelwa" , which means "one should visit where he/she came from". The Maropeng caves are known as the Cradle of humankind. There is a relation between the ideom and those caves because the God who birthed all the Tswana people called LOWE OR LOE IS BELIEVED TO HAVE RESIDED IN THOSE CAVES. It is not a coincidence that one of the earliest species closer to Humans in appearance and genetically is found in those caves.
@@tshiamomaremela6870 Spot-on. You're right. And let's stop foreigners from lumping us together into these imaginary laughable groupings.
Bantus are Israelites.
@lgo5398 would you expand on that ?
@@tomatosoup6440The groupings are based on the fact that we share similar languages. That's it. I don't know why you guys are so against that
White European history of Africa 😂😂😂😂
Just believing all these lies written by Europeans and how do they if there was a Bantu expansion yet African people will still believe these lies
@@InamInam-p3f it’s all a theory but Africans are taking them as the truth
Spot on 💯
False alarm
They are desert eagles , like us , most of us till we are absorbed by other cultures
Bantus are Israelites.
Isrealis are isrealites. The gospel spread to Africa quickly. And they soon knew of Jesus in Ethiopia.
@@GTRKT-qr5sfThe intent of some wicked people is to cause CONFUSION. The MODERN-DAY Israelis in the land of Israel are IMPOSTORS. They descended from Esau of the bible. The true Israelites had to FLEE to MANY parts of the continent of AFRICA. Yes, in certain areas, they are more concentrated. People would say that the word "Bantu" represents a blanket of totally different groups of people who are not related. However, that word ONLY PERTAINS to the SCATTERED ISRAELITES.
The Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup is what is to be used to identify the Bantu people as Israelites which they are.
I didn't edit the response. Yet, it showed as if I edited it.
We are not. We are Africans.
I am sorry to say this but none of our oral history says we come from that area.
ua-cam.com/video/AWRKloQXFHM/v-deo.htmlsi=5wWSfTVAzTheSXwL
Inaccurate