YouTubers Destroyed Their Career in 1 Video..

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,4 тис.

  • @atozy
    @atozy  7 місяців тому +2639

    I just found out they responded to this situation minutes before I posted this video so will make a follow up video asap!

    • @sarg0013
      @sarg0013 7 місяців тому +135

      I dont feeI any different about them after their apoIogy video. It was Iack Iuster

    • @SensiProductionzBlindDogVideos
      @SensiProductionzBlindDogVideos 7 місяців тому +23

      If they don’t go to Amazon like why files and others did, or even kick, then they’ll be back. But maybe they’ve been saving. Maybe this will work? They do have a good business mindset, so all we can do is wait and see I guess?😇
      Yt pays real well. It’s just greedy to want more… imo

    • @Impulse21s
      @Impulse21s 7 місяців тому +47

      Yeah, someone finally ran the numbers and - Oops....

    • @merenuisence
      @merenuisence 7 місяців тому +25

      I'm glad your dropped out of school to become a "full time UA-cam nerd too." 😂❤ @atozy

    • @EEEEEEEEEK
      @EEEEEEEEEK 7 місяців тому +17

      Literally your video right next to their reply on my page.

  • @AmethystEyes
    @AmethystEyes 7 місяців тому +2030

    I remember seeing a comment that said: “so you’re breaking up with me because I’m broke?”
    And that’s honestly what it felt like.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +85

      Another one someone shared “so we’re being laid off?”
      Both are so true

    • @whossoul
      @whossoul 7 місяців тому +41

      I feel that. I hate this. I love Watcher, my daughter and I used to watch Puppet History together and I loved that it made history fun for her. But when I pay $15 for ad free all of UA-cam I'm not gonna pay half of that just for access to one channel.

    • @InVinoVeratas
      @InVinoVeratas 7 місяців тому +20

      The amount of time they spent accumulating the reputation they gained, has just blown up in their faces. Was it worth it? Years spent building up your reputation in the public, just to lose it in less than two weeks. Brilliant marketing. I bet they hired a university graduate and this was their first professional job.

    • @LK-lz6lk
      @LK-lz6lk 7 місяців тому +6

      "It's not me, it's you."😉

  • @trashkuun
    @trashkuun 7 місяців тому +4623

    I think their biggest problem is... They forgot they were UA-camRS. They are not a multimillion dollar production company, they are UA-camrs.

    • @joaobrandao9482
      @joaobrandao9482 7 місяців тому +13

      True.

    • @joaobrandao9482
      @joaobrandao9482 7 місяців тому +93

      They thought they were Apple or Google for a second.

    • @allegorx58
      @allegorx58 7 місяців тому +12

      Huh? Their channel is easily valued in excess of a mil.

    • @AquarianNomadic
      @AquarianNomadic 7 місяців тому +34

      That's 99.9% of YT right now.
      The hubris is cringe.

    • @NaterBater
      @NaterBater 7 місяців тому +47

      @@blackcloud415​⁠​⁠a lot of people think channels make more money than they do. Why did they need to do something knew with a subscription paywall if they were making millions?

  • @gh0s7sama
    @gh0s7sama 7 місяців тому +2211

    It’s basically the same reason Buzzfeed failed. Too much extra. Extra employees, extra fluff content no one cared about. Extra overhead. All overproduced.
    They should stick to the two or three most popular shows and do more of it.

    • @Honeybeerose88
      @Honeybeerose88 7 місяців тому +95

      I used to enjoy Buzzfeed back in 2010. It was a lot of fun to see the meme compilations and just do quizzes with friends. Now it’s like a celeb rag mag.

    • @mechasentai
      @mechasentai 7 місяців тому +63

      Buzzfeed basically begian pandering to angry and resentful female versions of Incels lol y'all know it's true. 😅😂

    • @lovelykatsudon6328
      @lovelykatsudon6328 7 місяців тому +24

      i followed them from buzzfeed just for the ghostfiles, i dont watch the rest

    • @thefourhorsemen91
      @thefourhorsemen91 7 місяців тому +14

      Ironic since they left Buzzfeed to do their own thing.

    • @TigersandBearsOhMy
      @TigersandBearsOhMy 7 місяців тому +15

      Buzzfeed also got political and became exhausting to read.

  • @STORMDAME
    @STORMDAME 7 місяців тому +1086

    My favorite comment on their vid was from someone who said "If I wanted a dude with a Tesla to call me broke I would have gone to Twitter"

  • @anonymouse9833
    @anonymouse9833 7 місяців тому +668

    I won't pay $10/mo for HBO, I'm definitely not paying $10/mo for a _single UA-cam channel_

    • @queenofnyc5584
      @queenofnyc5584 5 місяців тому +2

      Free trial on free trial

    • @SN-qd9qw
      @SN-qd9qw 3 місяці тому +2

      dude its like 15

  • @epictoe7179
    @epictoe7179 7 місяців тому +2832

    This one is my favorite comment from the video “Did i just get laid off as a viewer?”
    Yes

    • @Rantsack
      @Rantsack 7 місяців тому +39

      🤣😂🤣

    • @timothymcintire5747
      @timothymcintire5747 7 місяців тому +61

      Not even the comment sections are safe. I hope those subscribers can land back on their feet.
      What a world!

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +20

      Omg it DOES feel like that 😆

    • @gwendolyn2442
      @gwendolyn2442 7 місяців тому

      @@Mama_Bear524they outgrew us…

    • @crowndizking1
      @crowndizking1 6 місяців тому

      🤩

  • @bandit_of_trash
    @bandit_of_trash 7 місяців тому +756

    When they did Buzzfeed Unsolved the only "effects" they had were literal blue and yellow text on a screen. That was the content I signed up for, and what made everyone fall in love with their content. We don't want or need overproduced shows. We're not there for things to look nice, we just want to have a good time and they were more than succeeding at that.

    • @evopotato
      @evopotato 7 місяців тому +15

      Exactly!!

    • @SuperMelrose1
      @SuperMelrose1 7 місяців тому +36

      Yes…WHEEZE….it was little things like that. That’s what we loved.

    • @clambroth1923
      @clambroth1923 7 місяців тому +2

      Seeing this topic about these youtubers for the first time on here. Whoever they were, whatever it was they were doing? Its all going down the drain so there apparently
      isn't any point in sifting through the ashes to watch some of their previous videos - whatever it was they were doing previously, I guess it is no more. Ooooops G'bye.

    • @Carols989
      @Carols989 7 місяців тому +15

      I actually liked it more because it was simpler, the new watcher videos are very well produced but they seem almost off, like the passion is gone

    • @bandit_of_trash
      @bandit_of_trash 7 місяців тому +11

      @@Carols989 That's exactly how I feel. I remember I watched every single Unsolved video they put out as soon as they were posted, I haven't watched most of the Watcher videos

  • @dnmitch
    @dnmitch 7 місяців тому +3239

    People shit on UA-cam Premium but I watch SO much youtube that if I have to watch ads I get pissed off. LOL

    • @atozy
      @atozy  7 місяців тому +1121

      if I had to have only 1 subscription it would easily be UA-cam premium

    • @jennstewart3003
      @jennstewart3003 7 місяців тому +395

      You also get UA-cam music so there's no need for Spotify. $11.99 a month for no ads and unlimited music and podcasts? Yes please!

    • @brosephbroman7564
      @brosephbroman7564 7 місяців тому +366

      That's been YTs strategy lately. Annoy you with ads till you pay. They even have ads saying that. "Tired of us annoying you with ads? Get YT Premium!" They're literally, intentionally harassing you with ads till you pay. Almost like old mobs. "Tired of us destroying your windows? Pay protection money!"

    • @LuxFuxx
      @LuxFuxx 7 місяців тому +50

      Premium is goated

    • @jennstewart3003
      @jennstewart3003 7 місяців тому +49

      @@brosephbroman7564 If it works, it works?

  • @alexiabeatriz00
    @alexiabeatriz00 7 місяців тому +164

    the comment of a person that said that they watched ghost files on the line for food stamps and that they literally couldn't afford 6 dollars broke me. they just shat all over their audience.

    • @GrimlyYours
      @GrimlyYours 7 місяців тому +5

      Okay but mood 😅

  • @lilahsadventures5717
    @lilahsadventures5717 7 місяців тому +147

    As a devout watcher of WATCHER, I don’t want high production content I just want Shane and Ryan doing their thing,they have incredible chemistry and it’s enjoyable to watch thats all. 😊

    • @grey3414
      @grey3414 7 місяців тому +14

      This. I just want their raw moments when they're are nagging each other. No crazy editing. Just dim lights, read a story, put in some jokes in there. That's it. 😂

    • @marcial.1636
      @marcial.1636 7 місяців тому +8

      Exactly! I wasn't too crazy with all the fancy production..it was the fun dynamic that I enjoyed between Shane and Ryan.

  • @CieraMychele
    @CieraMychele 7 місяців тому +363

    15:25 "I think if they made it a more budget version theyd still have the same number of viewers" Ive been a fan of them since buzzfeed and you hit the nail on the head. So many fans' reactions were "we never asked for any of this!????"

    • @allisonlouie1202
      @allisonlouie1202 7 місяців тому +16

      I’ve been a fan of them since buzzfeed too. A lot of their older videos, like their pandemic era and their buzzfeed unsolved stuff, were pretty robustly produced. They were able to created a loyal fan base based on their dynamic and simple production

  • @TheRandompaint
    @TheRandompaint 7 місяців тому +570

    The guys who used to work at BuzzFeed took the BuzzFeed route. Shocker😂

    • @gbalfour9618
      @gbalfour9618 7 місяців тому +31

      The people who ran Buzzfeed into the ground try to run their own shit into the ground. Haha

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому +5

      The guys who used to work at BuzzFeed took the BuzzFeed route. Shocmer😂

    • @SheilaDeBonis
      @SheilaDeBonis 7 місяців тому +21

      Hoping to see some "Why I left Watcher" videos and blog posts soon.

  • @watermelonsugar4478
    @watermelonsugar4478 7 місяців тому +444

    If Shane and Ryan/Watcher somehow see this:
    I actually stopped watching Unsolved when the production quality when up.
    On one hand, I was like “Damn! I’m so proud of them! Rock on!”
    But then I just didn’t feel like I was watching “someone”, the personality felt gone.
    Like atozy said, people come here to NOT watch “netflix style” content.
    And that’s 100% accurate for me.
    Sometimes I want to watch a full scale documentary, with 5 different narrators and 20 interviews from different people and flashy graphics.
    But sometimes (Most of the time actually) I want to listen to just one or two people talking at a camera with just small basic photos coming into frame to add to their point/give examples/etc.

    • @captainngoose
      @captainngoose 7 місяців тому +38

      Yeahh I lost interest when it became over produced. I liked it when it was much more simple and all about personality.

    • @_namori_fan_
      @_namori_fan_ 6 місяців тому +7

      its inaccurate to say the quality has gone up if it has become less enjoyable

  • @blutoable
    @blutoable 7 місяців тому +104

    They got used to using buzzfeed’s money so when they realized how much it costs to use their own, they knew they fucked up

  • @NekoArts
    @NekoArts 7 місяців тому +74

    This reminds me of a travel-vlog channel that I followed a couple of years back. The team consisted of a married couple traveling to various places and the usual vlog-material. They were very popular at the time because they were very relatable and they didn't push unnecessary sponsorships and the like. So they got to the point where they were about to visit their 100th (if I remember correctly) country and so they started talking about how they wanted to do something special to commemorate it. A sort of celebration together with their viewers. Fans were excited, everyone was excited. Then as this special video was about to be dropped, they instead dropped a video stating that if you wanted to see this video then you could purchase it for X dollars (if I remember correctly, they had like a sliding scale on the payment so there was a minimum you could pay and then you could pay extra if you wanted to. I don't remember how much the minimum was, but a couple of dollars).
    In the video, you then see them both musing about "what if so and so many people pay 100 dollars for this?!" with pretty much dollar-signs in their eyes.. Unsurprisingly, they recieved a ton of backlash (so much in fact that they closed down the comments on said video) and lost a huge chunk of followers.
    A few days later, they (or rather; the husband) did a follow-up video where the husband apologized and showed clips of his wife crying (because mean comments) and said that they'd release the video for free anyway and anyone who wanted a refund could get one. The damage had already been done though and plenty of people still decided to leave.
    The funny thing was (and many commented on this) that the husband is known for being quite a cheapskate and there are plenty of examples on their channel where he'd deny his wife to do certain things (like taking a 1 dollar ferris wheel ride) just because he wanted to save money. "You won't let your wife take a ride on a cheap ferris wheel but you expect us to pay for a video that you've been promoting (as free) for weeks now?"
    I don't remember if they ever did Patreon but I know they had plenty of other revenue-streams that they were doing pretty well on, including selling group-travels to places like Myanmar and whatnot - all of which were really popular, so they were definitely not running low on cash.
    I don't know if they ever bounced back from that (it was a couple of years ago this happened and I stopped following them after the "apology"), but they definitely did a lot of damage by pulling that stunt.
    I'm by no means an expert on these things but to me it looks like a combination of greed mixed with a big dose of inflated ego. I haven't seen Watcher (or even heard of them before this) so I don't know how high quality their content really is but I doubt that they're big enough to rival other services like Hulu or Netflix and judging by their subscription fees, it looks to me like that's exactly what they're trying to do. And if they come from Buzzfeed, I assume that their content is mainly aimed at a younger audience as well and they can't afford (especially now) to pay that much for yet another video service, even if they wanted to.
    Ego and greed is a dangerous thing..

    • @briarchambliss
      @briarchambliss 7 місяців тому +10

      god i wanna know who this is now 😩

    • @lottikokonut1250
      @lottikokonut1250 7 місяців тому +8

      i just read your long ass comment and I surprised myself coz I have no patience with reading nowadays 😂...

    • @revinaque1342
      @revinaque1342 7 місяців тому +2

      Whoa! Spill the tea! What's the name of this channel?

    • @Jamiegirl79
      @Jamiegirl79 7 місяців тому +3

      Kara and Nate 😂

    • @lachikita617
      @lachikita617 7 місяців тому +2

      @@Jamiegirl79I was thinking of Kara and Nate! But I don’t remember them doing that so I thought it was someone else. I started following them last year so this must of been before I started following their content. I wonder if the video is still up?
      Edit: it is! Just found the video, it’s from 4 years ago. I actually think they handled it really well and you can genuinely see how sorry they were. I’m glad their UA-cam continue to be successful! ☺️

  • @shadowxhero4953
    @shadowxhero4953 7 місяців тому +506

    Shocker.
    They bit the hand that feeds them and realized instantly when 50,000 or more people unsubbed within a day so they instantly took it back.
    Shocker.

    • @randovid1
      @randovid1 7 місяців тому +67

      not to mention they already have a paywalled content behind patreon, they already have 14,000 paid subscribers in patreon from 5$ - 25$ /month, THATS AT LEAST 70k usd AT LEAST. These greedy mfers think patreon making them 70k monthly is still not enough so they thought you know whats good, pay walling everything for a low low price of 6$ per month lmao

    • @shadowxhero4953
      @shadowxhero4953 7 місяців тому +45

      @@randovid1 Don’t know if this sounds rude but, I hope they realize they aren’t big enough to pull some bs like that. They aren’t close to big enough.

    • @blueflameSM
      @blueflameSM 7 місяців тому +16

      The real question is, is their patreon going to disappear as well? Or are they going to cheat their fans and have them pay twice for content which is idiotic.

    • @captainngoose
      @captainngoose 7 місяців тому +9

      Right.
      They were at 2.9 Mil subscribers before this happened. They lost a bit of subscribers after this lol

    • @greenbeantm1096
      @greenbeantm1096 3 місяці тому +1

      @@blueflameSMI don’t know if they were going to stop making patreon content, but the original plan was to charge people twice. That was one of the things they very quickly back peddled on when this blew up in their face, if you were a patreon supporter you got a code for their streaming site for free, and if you already paid for it they said to contact them and you’d be refunded

  • @Crispymfile
    @Crispymfile 7 місяців тому +918

    You missed out on the fact they have a patreon with 12k members, ranging from 5-100 euro tiers. They are definitely making enough money with merch, patreon, ads and sponsors combined. This move was pure greed

    • @claytoncourtney1309
      @claytoncourtney1309 7 місяців тому +25

      I agree they're probably making enough money. But what bothers me about this situation is how many fans are saying they support the guys yet they have almost 3 million subscribers but only 12,000 patreon subscribers?
      I understand not being able to afford the patreon. But there's still a difference between saying you support them when all you really do is get free entertainment from them.

    • @youresogolden_
      @youresogolden_ 7 місяців тому +58

      A 100€ tier??? Wth is in that one, a daily good morning message!? 😳

    • @Chaelsonen
      @Chaelsonen 7 місяців тому +10

      "making enough money" is some hasan level thinking.

    • @bumblebugz57
      @bumblebugz57 7 місяців тому +21

      And don’t forget when they go on the road and put on shows they put on and sell out.

    • @random_stuffgaming3277
      @random_stuffgaming3277 7 місяців тому +1

      @@claytoncourtney1309question don’t they make money from the people who just watch their videos and subscribe to them? People can support them by viewing their videos it’s a win win situation on both sides. They make money from the people watching and the people watching get free entertainment

  • @bunnyluver2176
    @bunnyluver2176 7 місяців тому +170

    If you look at their video they have an office directly across the street from the Hollywood hills sign. An 25 employees for this level of videos?? This is piss-poor management and bad decisions with greed tacked on.

    • @greenbeantm1096
      @greenbeantm1096 3 місяці тому +11

      I watched another video earlier about this situation and the video of Shane and Ryan getting drunk in Santa costumes had *19* people credited as working on it. 2 dudes sitting in chairs and talking while getting drunk did *not* require 19 people to create. If that’s not mismanaging funds (+ feeling guilty when not giving the friends you hired work) I don’t know what is

  • @JaaaayB2024
    @JaaaayB2024 7 місяців тому +61

    The fact that I don’t know who they are nor have I ever had one of their videos recommended says enough for me based on what I watch.

    • @phaedrapage4217
      @phaedrapage4217 7 місяців тому +10

      Funny thing is that it sounds like some of their stuff might not be too far off some of the content that I like but they've never popped up in my recommendations, lol. And that's fine by me, I've already got tons of shit to watch. Lol

  • @mattstafford9643
    @mattstafford9643 7 місяців тому +288

    This reminds me of when the Fine Bros announced they were copyrighting "reacting"

    • @ghoulgauze
      @ghoulgauze 7 місяців тому +24

      i’ve been searching for a comment that mentions this !!! it’s like the exact same situation… even the backtracking

    • @mattstafford9643
      @mattstafford9643 7 місяців тому +17

      @@ghoulgauze only og's remember😂. Every channel that does something this immediately falls off

    • @bigrichie6766
      @bigrichie6766 7 місяців тому +13

      Lmfao they really tried to copyright a word💀 UA-camrs get real comfortable with trying bs like that once they get a big fan base I swear. It’s always the “big production” UA-camrs too, as if people watch UA-camrs for the big budget🤨.

    • @cookiedoe6068
      @cookiedoe6068 7 місяців тому +4

      Jubilee is doing the same thing rn 😂

    • @mattstafford9643
      @mattstafford9643 7 місяців тому

      @@cookiedoe6068 oh damn😂

  • @placeholderHandle932
    @placeholderHandle932 7 місяців тому +257

    For someone who has been asking "Is it worth it?" for years Steven has somehow forgot to ask that on this decision lmao

  • @JameyMcQueen
    @JameyMcQueen 7 місяців тому +264

    Watcher had a Patreon with three different tiers. They had sponsors. They ran ads. Yet they wanted people to pay $6 on top of that. Pure greed.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +9

      They’re trying to do too much.

    • @sacb0y
      @sacb0y 7 місяців тому +3

      The problem with patreon (like youtube really) is they don't own it, they are at the mercy of patreon's rules and patreons sustainability as a business.

    • @bigrichie6766
      @bigrichie6766 7 місяців тому

      @@sacb0ylmao stop making excuses for them, they have many different avenues of revenue already, and if they really are so shite at business that they are losing money despite that, then they should take matters into their own hands and either fire people or cut down on costs, you don’t try to siphon more money from your broke mf audience tho. Your financials shouldn’t be the viewers problem.

    • @JameyMcQueen
      @JameyMcQueen 7 місяців тому +15

      @@sacb0y
      And? It still makes them money.

    • @shadelings
      @shadelings 7 місяців тому +16

      Supposedly, the creation of the Watcher platform was to supplement Steven's luxurious lifestyle. Why is he even involved, anyway? The only reason I joined Watcher channel was because of Shane and Ryan.

  • @thekidruss
    @thekidruss 7 місяців тому +66

    @20:07 when he said “early adapters” I rolled my eyes so hard. They’re not creating some new innovative concept..Their ego lol

  • @BIBSTERSrepairshop
    @BIBSTERSrepairshop 7 місяців тому +9

    Your point about the quality is so true it’s crazy how many UA-camrs still use phones for a majority of their footage. Viewers on UA-cam want content more than they want something overly polished.

  • @IImJive
    @IImJive 7 місяців тому +1372

    cultivate an audience that embraces "Eat the Rich" so who can they be mad at when the fans starts to cannibalize them for being greedy

    • @ActuallyHoudini
      @ActuallyHoudini 7 місяців тому +59

      "Capitalist realism has so captured public thought that the idea of anti-capitalism no longer acts as the antithesis to capitalism. Instead, it is deployed as a means for reinforcing capitalism. This is done through media which aims to provide a safe means of consuming anti-capitalist ideas without actually challenging the system. The lack of coherent alternatives, as presented through the lens of capitalist realism, leads many anti-capitalist movements to cease targeting the end of capitalism, but instead to mitigate its worst effects, often through individual consumption-based activities..."

    • @onepunchman6165
      @onepunchman6165 7 місяців тому +6

      What

    • @Sara-tone-N
      @Sara-tone-N 7 місяців тому +5

      Posting this everywhere? 😂

    • @gonelucid
      @gonelucid 7 місяців тому

      Greedy commies always using the sheep to get rich. Love it 😂

    • @feathercat9118
      @feathercat9118 7 місяців тому +2

      The irony at its finest.

  • @dayanacadet424
    @dayanacadet424 7 місяців тому +283

    Never heard of them and will most definitely not be tuning in but I HAVE to thank whoever commented, "WATCHER? I can't afford her!" for making me laugh so hard because I needed that, LMFAO.

    • @brosephbroman7564
      @brosephbroman7564 7 місяців тому +10

      Yeah anything from Buzzfeed is cancer.

    • @Dking1998
      @Dking1998 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@brosephbroman7564Yeah, I agree.

    • @User-g5j3k
      @User-g5j3k 7 місяців тому +4

      Used to watch them on unsolved buzz feed but I stopped watching after they left. I didn’t bother watching watcher either. People are struggling in the world and they paywall content, that’s a scam. They already have Patreon and it’s still not enough for them.

  • @zoewong7891
    @zoewong7891 7 місяців тому +224

    I actually unsubscribed to the Watcher channel after their announcement and I don’t think they can redeem themselves for the choices they proceeded with. Ryan and Shane were one of the few people who I enjoyed watching for their Paranormal expeditions and unsolved cases.

    • @js8qp2pwisos
      @js8qp2pwisos 7 місяців тому +16

      Tbf their paranormal expeditions are just them getting annoyed no ghosts are talking to them in a dark house

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому +6

      I actually unsubscribed to the Watcher channel after their announcement and I don’t think they can redeem themselves for the choices they processed with. Ryan and Shane were one of the few people who I enjoyed watching for their Paranormal expeditions and unsolved cases.

    • @hopsta5628
      @hopsta5628 7 місяців тому +18

      ​@@Theunicorn2012Why did you repeat, word for word, the comment made by zoewong?

    • @thefourhorsemen91
      @thefourhorsemen91 7 місяців тому

      Same.

    • @zoewong7891
      @zoewong7891 7 місяців тому +5

      @@Theunicorn2012 Yeah. Why did you copy a comment I left here?

  • @Tybalt.
    @Tybalt. 7 місяців тому +20

    Kinda hard to feel bad for these guys when Shane is openly dropping 55k on a wedding venue.

    • @diminie_chimket
      @diminie_chimket 24 дні тому

      Exactly, and people try to say they AREN'T greedy?? Jesus, like imagine you constantly recklessly spend all the money you make (like with what Shane did or what they all do all the time), employ way too many employees that they don't even need, and then complain about paying those employees?? Literally it's fucking greed.

  • @horses529
    @horses529 7 місяців тому +16

    It was also dumb for them in the fact that in Ghost Files, they keep traveling to places outside of the US. There are SO MANY places in Cali alone (closer and local) that they could just go to.

    • @asarishepard8171
      @asarishepard8171 5 місяців тому +6

      Not to mention they could just go to older local houses that aren't famous and have the family spin a story they'd follow. All the other ghost shows do it 😂

    • @horses529
      @horses529 5 місяців тому +3

      @@asarishepard8171 Exactly! They did it once when they were on Buzzfeed still. I don't understand why they think they need to constantly go abroad

  • @aethertoast4320
    @aethertoast4320 7 місяців тому +287

    They talk like startup Tech Bros in the video. Then they took in the over-bloated managment style of Buzzfeed making a horrible combination that resulted in this idiocy.

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому +5

      They tall like startup Tech Bros in the video. Then they took in the over-bloated management style of Buzzfeed making a horrible combination that resulted in this idiocy.

    • @OnEst_Opinion
      @OnEst_Opinion 7 місяців тому +13

      Did you notice how much they didn’t talk, or even mention, what the viewer wants? Hint: not once. It was purely “make content WE like” or “WE want to make shows”, nothing about what the viewers would want or like. They had a few good ideas that took off way backl when and it gave them an ego to the point that they think whatever they want is going to be exactly what their viewers want. I’d imagine their comment section has been stating this for quite a while but whoever they hired to do their social media, since they clearly aren’t doing much of anything themselves with 25+ employees, probably has heavily filtered what gets reported back to them since they seem like they can’t handle criticism or hearing only things they don’t agree with. They surrounded themselves with “yes men”.

    • @greenbeantm1096
      @greenbeantm1096 3 місяці тому +1

      @@OnEst_Opinionthat’s what happens when you almost exclusively hire friends. I just worked with a boss who did that (being one of the not friends) and after that I started saying “you shouldn’t hire friends, you should become friends with the people you hire”

  • @gbalfour9618
    @gbalfour9618 7 місяців тому +185

    This just shows buzzfeed people don't understand how business works

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому +3

      This just shows buzzfeed people don't understand how business works

    • @lHurtYourFeeIings
      @lHurtYourFeeIings 7 місяців тому

      They are leftist communists.

    • @nomadkat6836
      @nomadkat6836 7 місяців тому +3

      This shows BuzzFeed people don't understand life in general and their hacks melted their brains

  • @sarahhayes861
    @sarahhayes861 7 місяців тому +181

    The great thing about YT is the authenticity of youtubers and their content. People don't necessarily want highly produced content, I would go to a major streaming network to get that.

    • @gonelucid
      @gonelucid 7 місяців тому +5

      Great point. Makes me feel better about my channel😂

    • @rustymustard7798
      @rustymustard7798 7 місяців тому +6

      Yeah, i never even heard of these goofballs until now, just like most 'big' channels. I just don't care about the hype, show me something educational with substance VS polish. Any videos that feel overly 'produced' i just tune out and click away.

    • @Ryanneey
      @Ryanneey 7 місяців тому +7

      💯!! While they might like to make these super high-quality long form videos, the audience doesn't care. They're doing it to satisfy themselves, so they should eat the cost or tone it down.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому

      Exactly this!! It’s UA-cam, we want normal and fun videos not overproduced expensive ones.

    • @Lynn-kh5rs
      @Lynn-kh5rs 7 місяців тому

      @@Ryanneey In other words they let their egos get the better of them? (I wouldn't know, never saw these guys before this)

  • @Cand581
    @Cand581 7 місяців тому +31

    Their biggest downfall was their egos.

  • @SevenFyrs
    @SevenFyrs 7 місяців тому +22

    And they just rolled it back. Watcher, the streaming service, gets the vids a month early, then they're posting to YT.
    At least they heard us.

  • @Deedoof
    @Deedoof 7 місяців тому +517

    Even if the Watchers go back on their intentions, they made a public decision that changed everyone's opinions. That's like telling your parents you hate them, even though you didn't mean it. Certain things are out in the open forever.

    • @FukaiKokoro
      @FukaiKokoro 7 місяців тому +80

      They just uploaded. While I appreciate the apology their intentions soured my opinion.
      In the apology video they said they didn't want to let go of employees.
      They could've just managed the pateron better. Like actually keep it up to date and let go of redundant employees.

    • @4kach24
      @4kach24 7 місяців тому +13

      ​@@FukaiKokoro Many fans will eat that up anyways

    • @Marshmalo-wallow
      @Marshmalo-wallow 7 місяців тому +29

      Hey if logan can comeback from making fun of a deceased person and crypto zoo, I think watcher be fine

    • @laura-leigh8935
      @laura-leigh8935 7 місяців тому +16

      They have certainly changed my opinion of them. I only watched Ghost Files so there was no way I was paying to stream them. It was disappointing because I liked them alot.

    • @pettykittyfam
      @pettykittyfam 7 місяців тому +18

      ​@@FukaiKokoroTell me they aren't passing the blame on anything but their own egos & greed? 😂
      Of course... Sorry guys we just didn't want to fire people? Lol😮 ummm 🤔 excuse me if I don't believe you 😂

  • @saldiven2009
    @saldiven2009 7 місяців тому +144

    I can't imagine spending $59.99/year to watch two or three shows. There is no chance there will be a sufficient amount of content to justify spending that much money on it.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +9

      Ya I got rid of cable tv because I was paying about that to watch like 2 shows that were mostly ads. I’m not going to pay for a subscription doing essentially the same thing.

    • @mromutt
      @mromutt 7 місяців тому +21

      So I have been noticing something for a little while now about youtubers that live in big cities or at least expensive places to live. They either forget or have no concept that for most other people thats a lot of money. They get so used to eating something cheap there costing $30 or $40 bucks, or $12 coffee, $20 parking is the sketchy parking and so on. Well for many other places $30 is going somewhere somewhat nice lol coffee is cheap and parking is free and their income is a tiny fraction of those places that cost so much to live in.

    • @KelseyDrummer
      @KelseyDrummer 7 місяців тому +9

      ​@@mromutt I've noticed it too. They're living in a completely different reality.

    • @asarishepard8171
      @asarishepard8171 5 місяців тому

      Ikr? I axed hulu when Netflix raised their prices. and hulu has alot more stuff than these goobers 😂

  • @SNerd42
    @SNerd42 7 місяців тому +94

    They are way overthinking this, it's dumb. All of their problems already have solutions, no need to reinvent the wheel. UA-cam -> Sponsorships -> Patreon -> Merch -> Collabs, rinse and repeat. Then when your money is right make the long form, high quality content and sell it to one of the streaming platforms.

    • @sprig5173
      @sprig5173 7 місяців тому +16

      That's what I thought. They could sell a show to Netflix if that's their goal.

    • @AliciaL98
      @AliciaL98 7 місяців тому +10

      It kind of sounds like a recent MBA grad gave them a bunch of half-baked ideas and they ran with it.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +1

      @@AliciaL98😂 probably

    • @anonview
      @anonview 7 місяців тому +9

      That's what The Try Guys did, I think. Put out enough quality content to get the attention of media networks that could provide them TV and streaming opportunities. I don't understand why they didn't get advice from their acquaintances. I mean, they'd collabed before.

  • @leilanicorbelle
    @leilanicorbelle 7 місяців тому +8

    13:33 Exactly - knowing your target audience is SO important! It literally determines so much of your text like your tone and diction, the angle of your argument, the publisher/platform…you have to know how your audience thinks so you can formulate your text to reach them effectively and efficiently

  • @NormaWills
    @NormaWills 7 місяців тому +29

    I used to love watching Buzzfeed, but I never got recommended Watchers. So, I never even heard of their newer channel. I am on YT daily watching videos. That says a lot about their focus on marketing and channel branding.

  • @BenShapirosGyno
    @BenShapirosGyno 7 місяців тому +161

    Literally $9-$10 is like Netflix, Hulu subscription prices. Geeeeez. Plus it’s a time where people really can’t afford extra expense like that..

    • @Pocket_Sized_Satan
      @Pocket_Sized_Satan 7 місяців тому +16

      It was 6 bucks for them but thats still way to much a lot of people cant afford that some people are 6 bucks away from not eating

    • @brendamurithi_Kari
      @brendamurithi_Kari 7 місяців тому

      I'm from a third world country and that's what the average household uses on groceries a week , it's even cheaper to pay UA-cam premium for me because atleast the streaming servics and UA-cam subsidizes prices according to countries ​@@Pocket_Sized_Satan

    • @IDiggPattyMayonnaise
      @IDiggPattyMayonnaise 7 місяців тому +10

      Anything over $.99 is too much for what the offer

    • @grey3414
      @grey3414 7 місяців тому +10

      I feel like subscription to netflix is still understandable because there's thousands of high quality shows in there...meanwhile $6 for content that you can access right now for free on the watcher channel doesn't make sense plus a new show on May? Who will pay for $6 just for a new show that you don't even know if you'll like? That doesn't make sense. They don't make sense

    • @bigrichie6766
      @bigrichie6766 7 місяців тому +4

      Their crap shows should stay free

  • @khyrulanwaar4628
    @khyrulanwaar4628 7 місяців тому +85

    They got out of Buzzfeed but could not get Buzzfed out of them.

    • @dannynaylor5485
      @dannynaylor5485 7 місяців тому

      😂

    • @gbalfour9618
      @gbalfour9618 7 місяців тому +1

      I have a feeling they were why Buzzfeed went the direction it did.

  • @ZombieGyrl2384
    @ZombieGyrl2384 7 місяців тому +164

    Seeing as how well Buzzfeed is doing - They just 'Watched' their money go out the window....

  • @icanmakeeverythingilovedie9861
    @icanmakeeverythingilovedie9861 7 місяців тому +11

    This is EXACTLY what (and who) Patreon exists for. Money from ads, money from people who want to support your work on Patreon with very little censorship, and they'd probably do pretty well.

  • @noobfuzilado8661
    @noobfuzilado8661 7 місяців тому +509

    The entire Internet has been talking about this for three days.

    • @john-Mustang-wick
      @john-Mustang-wick 7 місяців тому +13

      Why who cares

    • @White_Crystal_Snow
      @White_Crystal_Snow 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@john-Mustang-wick hm, then why does everyone talk about how USA protests from Israel? Why did we talk about Akira Toriyama for a whole week? Why do people talk about marvel or DC how they suck now? Huh, why? No one cares?

    • @taags
      @taags 7 місяців тому +19

      Why do so many care about internet drama, this is the first time I have ever heard of these guys, still dont know why this was recommended to me.

    • @smoxthybweh
      @smoxthybweh 7 місяців тому +33

      I think it's because the decision feels like it came out of nowhere and feels really out of character from what people know and believe of the ghoul boys. Plus, not a lot of juicey things have been happening lately 👀

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 7 місяців тому +16

      Literally, someone who is terminally online, has not heard shit about this till now lol

  • @ajwilson1985
    @ajwilson1985 7 місяців тому +37

    The frustration in Atozy face during this almost 30 mins vid kept me here… nothing was negative he said he was just disappointed in their decision that’s respect… he could of ripped them but he was just SMH and sound explanation throughout that is why I watch you bro!!!

  • @abigailann6869
    @abigailann6869 7 місяців тому +41

    The biggest problem with things like this, is there is soo much content being made that if you get bored, tired of, or something like this happnes. There is a minimum of 10 others doing something similar enough to go watch instead.

    • @sprig5173
      @sprig5173 7 місяців тому +6

      Why would you pay for content? There's too much free stuff to watch it all.

  • @keyqchan
    @keyqchan 7 місяців тому +12

    Nobody asked for "TV caliber" content but they gaslighted us the fanbase to think that we wanted it and that we definitely could afford their streaming service. Their audacity and how they overestimated their appeal are astounding.

  • @rue_pardox
    @rue_pardox 7 місяців тому +11

    Imagine if every bit of content on Netflix was casting the same 3 guys in every movie/tv show

  • @aimlessalix8066
    @aimlessalix8066 7 місяців тому +47

    Shane looks unhappy, Ryan looks scared, and Steven looks way too confident

    • @diminie_chimket
      @diminie_chimket 24 дні тому

      Eh, Shane literally dropped $55k on a single wedding venue when there are plenty of other venues that AREN'T as expensive but are still considered fancy or romantic...while he literally is all about "eating the rich"...

  • @jaritsu
    @jaritsu 7 місяців тому +79

    The "why" boils down to their CEO, who unfortunately seems to want to both be a "CEO" type baller, and also wants to dump a bunch of money into revitalizing "Worth It" which he hosts. And if you're familiar with the series, requires a lot of money due to the premise of the show.
    And before anybody pushes back, the CEO posted a tumblr post that made this pretty clear in it's town and flailing to justify the decision, that ultimately is an executive decision even if the founders are also complicit in the decision.

    • @lilithium3940
      @lilithium3940 7 місяців тому +14

      I absolutely think a move like this boils down to the CEO. Dropout tv pulled this off super successfully but they also have a CEO who is super transparent, cares about his employees, and participates in content

    • @lisahoshowsky4251
      @lisahoshowsky4251 7 місяців тому +22

      Yeah, everybody going “well you can’t blame Steven they’re all adults” yeah, but Steven is the CEO. When bad business decisions get made elsewhere people scrutinize the CEO. I’m not saying Shane and Ryan didn’t play a part or agree to go along with it but as CEO Steven does shoulder a larger responsibility for the direction they take the company. He is literally the appointed person at that company that people are going to look at and into when big public announcements and changes like this are made. Now I’m not sure if Ryan and Shane retain ownership, or what percentage of ownership they have but it does boil down to the fact Steven is the designated head of the business and it reflects more poorly on him because of that. (He’s also just not as well liked but that’s on a personal not a business note and I think people get too caught up in that trying to give him a pass)

    • @WookieWoman
      @WookieWoman 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@lilithium3940 Dropout also actually HAD to make a huge change because of everything that happened that caused Sam to buy the Company. But like you said, the obvious difference in the intention of the person running things... Dropout is worth every cent. I will not be paying for Watcher. 😑

    • @Cozyhorrorshow
      @Cozyhorrorshow 7 місяців тому +3

      Dropout was also I believe 3 dollars when it first started and now has over 17 shows with dozens of talents and is NOW 5.99 a month!

    • @mattywest8019
      @mattywest8019 7 місяців тому +1

      A CEO has 1 role. Keep investors happy

  • @Missmadhatter08
    @Missmadhatter08 7 місяців тому +46

    Not Atozy with the dad head drop in disappointment with the the dad stare in silence at 26 min in lol

  • @liladjgal1204
    @liladjgal1204 7 місяців тому +9

    Seamless sponsor break, I applaud you Atozy

  • @annieblanchet9742
    @annieblanchet9742 7 місяців тому +13

    I've watched them since their Buzzfeed days and am devastated by the news. I am NOT paying for another subscription service.

  • @Adiscretefirm
    @Adiscretefirm 7 місяців тому +29

    Ironic they used such a nostalgic CRT television for a prop without seeing the larger metaphor that TV itself is old tech

  • @sonicswag90
    @sonicswag90 7 місяців тому +196

    7:30 did anyone forget UA-cam Red??
    Does “Scared Pewdiepie” ring a bell?😂

    • @maxbracegirdle9990
      @maxbracegirdle9990 7 місяців тому +11

      I really wanted to see season 2 of that. From what I hear it really came into its own. Too bad about the bridge incident

    • @TheUnknownD
      @TheUnknownD 7 місяців тому +2

      Scared pewdiepie is n amazing show.

    • @arisenvalentine6288
      @arisenvalentine6288 7 місяців тому +18

      UA-cam red? Now thats a name i havnt heard in a loooong time, takes me back to the summer of '13.

    • @sonicswag90
      @sonicswag90 7 місяців тому

      @@arisenvalentine6288 🤣🤣

    • @themoocow7718
      @themoocow7718 7 місяців тому

      I remember that. Think I watched DanTDM’s show and MatPat’s.

  • @Enlotherover
    @Enlotherover 7 місяців тому +35

    Something I found crazy, is that I have never been recommended a video from their channel. I watch ghost stories, true crime, unsolved mysteries at least a few times a week. I used to watch them on buzzfeed unsolved too, but have never seen their channel in my recommended.

    • @sprig5173
      @sprig5173 7 місяців тому +10

      I'd never heard of them until this debacle.

    • @princess4509
      @princess4509 7 місяців тому

      honestly it was something you had to search for since day 1 i would regularly rewatch unsolved and search in history their names and eventually got them that way but algorithmically i always had to check the subscribed tag unless i binged previously

    • @grey3414
      @grey3414 7 місяців тому +2

      I think because their channel has been a hodgepodge of everything at this point. With buzzfeed unsolved, there's just one genre. While the watcher channel has "everything" from lifestyle, to history, to true crime and paranormal. So i think that's why yt algorithm is getting confused

    • @jijitters
      @jijitters 7 місяців тому

      Weird. I literally cannot imagine being active on the internet and not seeing/hearing about them constantly. I suspect everyone who's never heard of them is really upright or into "bro" stuff and therefore doesn't hear about the more fun side of the internet.

    • @cheyennewhite7946
      @cheyennewhite7946 7 місяців тому +3

      @@jijittersi mean, if you don’t watch true crime or supernatural type videos then you probably wouldn’t know ryan and shane and if you don’t know them enough that u follow them closely then you might not know about watcher bc it’s not a monster of a company

  • @Mushroom_moon_stirfry
    @Mushroom_moon_stirfry 7 місяців тому +5

    What were they thinking? People don’t even pay for Discovery Channel these days.

  • @KDiamond666
    @KDiamond666 7 місяців тому +5

    Atozy I remember when you was a small UA-cam channel and I immediately was hooked. I’m so grateful I did! You keep me update on every single thing here in this yt streets. Ty for always putting your fans over greed ❤

  • @claraluna7436
    @claraluna7436 7 місяців тому +138

    Gotta review the update now! 😂

  • @Trag3dyInV3nus
    @Trag3dyInV3nus 7 місяців тому +58

    They got greedy and think that because some people recognize them on the street they have all this fandom but they don’t. They think they’re famous and above UA-cam. I unsubscribed to them and after their apology I’m still not going to watch them.

    • @AnthologyOfDave
      @AnthologyOfDave 7 місяців тому +2

      Dude, Bergara was in the MCU. Like a close up shot of him saying hello to Ant Man. I think thats pretty famous.

    • @SoManyRandomRamblings
      @SoManyRandomRamblings 7 місяців тому +4

      It's math and people not grasping it. They think oh i have millions of followers. But with billions of humans on the internet 60 million is only 1% of total internet users. So less than 3 million Watcher subscribers means they are less than 0.05% of internet users.

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +2

      I’m not unsubbing. At least not yet. But I agree. They got full of themselves

    • @Mama_Bear524
      @Mama_Bear524 7 місяців тому +3

      @@AnthologyOfDavedoesn’t mean he’s super famous. It was super cool to see him but the movie was a flop. It didn’t do well so not that many people saw it.
      He’s not famous enough to do what he tried to pull off here. Though I do like him a lot.

  • @pcarebear1
    @pcarebear1 7 місяців тому +26

    I loved them on Buzzfeed unsolved, it was like a PowerPoint with the awesome dynamic with Shane and Ryan. I have a feeling they don't see themselves as a business, more as a "creative environment for creatives "personal friends". Instead of removing the uber amount of icing on their cake (that no one asked for) they are going to lose the bakery.

  • @kaitlynisnotreal
    @kaitlynisnotreal 7 місяців тому +12

    ok bjut if Atozy made a video called "how to drill a hole in the wall" I'd still watch

  • @ComplacentOtter
    @ComplacentOtter 7 місяців тому +41

    Do they ACTUALLY want to be writer/director/actor? They should put together a pilot and talk to netflix. I agree with Atozy here though, they're UA-camRS.

    • @nickyfriesen8185
      @nickyfriesen8185 2 місяці тому +1

      This is honestly what they should have done. If they wanted the route of a large production and crew then going for Netflix or another streaming service would have worked better.

  • @PearlRadiant
    @PearlRadiant 7 місяців тому +39

    The way you described how channels get picked up by new viewers is literally how I found this channel and a band I follow now.

    • @lottikokonut1250
      @lottikokonut1250 7 місяців тому +1

      I just learned it now myself😊

    • @goldenageofdinosaurs7192
      @goldenageofdinosaurs7192 7 місяців тому +1

      @@lottikokonut1250I watched a moist critical video the other day and was recommended this channel today. I’ve never watched Atozy before this.

  • @Barooth100
    @Barooth100 7 місяців тому +63

    having the standalone site with pay models or fully pay gated isn't the worst thing, just cutting out the free stuff completely is stupid

    • @user-Mike8290
      @user-Mike8290 7 місяців тому +13

      They can't create enough diverse interesting content to bring enough people in to justify it. They ain't netflix

    • @mromutt
      @mromutt 7 місяців тому +2

      Yeah, at the very least they could start an ad free platform for the subscription and have some exclusives and extras like bts well still having most their normal content on youtube. a lot of the patrons would probably automatically sub to that as well so it would still boost income. Then they could grow that platform.

  • @whiterabit
    @whiterabit 7 місяців тому +42

    You missed Patrion from your white board. Watcher has one with three options. So they had already put content behind a paywall. I think they made watcher tv because they wanted to get picked up by Netflix and they didn’t

  • @gwendolyn2442
    @gwendolyn2442 7 місяців тому +44

    Steven Lim was the worst choice for CEO. I believe that he’s always pushing and pushing for more money to be spent, constantly spending beyond their means until it finally resulted in this decision. If Ryan and Shane had just had their shows here, they’d definitely be able to afford it, but because they have Lim’s show (worth it), which doesn’t pull as many views, they’re overspending consistently.

    • @GalinaEv
      @GalinaEv 7 місяців тому +13

      I still dont know why he is in so many shows. Dude lacks charisma, but is included in almost everything

    • @gwendolyn2442
      @gwendolyn2442 7 місяців тому +12

      @@GalinaEv I agree, him in too many spirits is like watching a spoiled little kid fight for attention and sulk when it’s not all about him

    • @GalinaEv
      @GalinaEv 7 місяців тому +5

      @gwendolyn2442 i tried to pretend that he is playing it up for the show, but ended up just skipping to the reading

    • @gwendolyn2442
      @gwendolyn2442 7 місяців тому +5

      @@GalinaEv same, it sucks cause I love that show, but I always skip the bartender parts when he’s in them

  • @cami1262
    @cami1262 7 місяців тому +3

    This is either greed, maybe bad advice from someone NOT in the YT business, or extremely poor money management or all of the above

  • @Joe90h
    @Joe90h 7 місяців тому +29

    It's a tale as old as time. UA-cam channel grows, so they hire more people to expedite the process of releasing videos so they can more comfortably meet deadlines. which means they need more money coming in, so they put out some lower effort content to supplement the high effort stuff, and they start taking on more sponsorships. Then they need more on screen presences as they spin off further, growing their roster with Poochies that the fans don't really gel with, and the new stuff gets ignored so only the 'original series' people subbed for gets clicks, and ultimately it becomes unsustainable.

    • @mromutt
      @mromutt 7 місяців тому

      so rooster teeth and all its branches? XD and I guess also somewhat sourcefed (god I miss sourcefed)

  • @Kennie0124
    @Kennie0124 7 місяців тому +142

    They JUST posted a video rolling back the announcement and apologized...

    • @Unfortunately_Mickey
      @Unfortunately_Mickey 7 місяців тому +41

      Of course they did. Wonder if their audience will trust it

    • @DeathstrokeFGC
      @DeathstrokeFGC 7 місяців тому +41

      They already showed that they’re greedy people. Just because they now realize that they can’t be as greed as they want to be doesn’t mean they still aren’t greedy

    • @chikumori5530
      @chikumori5530 7 місяців тому +3

      @@Unfortunately_Mickey Seemed pretty genuine to me.

    • @TheEpicNewman
      @TheEpicNewman 7 місяців тому +24

      ​@chikumori5530 genuinely sorry about the response lol

    • @4kach24
      @4kach24 7 місяців тому +4

      ​@@TheEpicNewmantrue,heh

  • @lobkeh4067
    @lobkeh4067 7 місяців тому +84

    There's a UA-camr made subscription service called Nebula. I don't understand why they didn't just join that... it would be way easier to market since people would get more than only their content. Jet Lag combines this really well with their UA-cam channel.
    Making a separate service just for their content wasn't a smart move if they're also going to stop making content on UA-cam

    • @lovelybones8179
      @lovelybones8179 7 місяців тому +24

      That would be great because then they'd be advertising Nebula, which helps the other creators! I didn't even kno about Nebula until someone else in their comment section said something.

    • @TheEpicNewman
      @TheEpicNewman 7 місяців тому +28

      They want the whole pie, not a slice

    • @FukaiKokoro
      @FukaiKokoro 7 місяців тому +11

      Or just manage their pateron. Like keep it up to date. And lay off redundant employees.

    • @kmer3086
      @kmer3086 7 місяців тому +8

      I was literally thinking the same thing! Why not just join Nebula? I guess they didn't want to share the wealth or collaborate...smh.

    • @gonelucid
      @gonelucid 7 місяців тому

      Greed is real and commies are no exception.

  • @PassingNotesMusic
    @PassingNotesMusic 7 місяців тому +3

    Love the longer form video here. I know there's a lot to unpack with this topic and it's a lot more work to make longer videos, but I still wanted to throw my 2 cents in here and say I like it. My preference is usually 20+ minutes.

  • @kman7680
    @kman7680 7 місяців тому +3

    They could break up their long videos into 20-30 min parts, so theyd generate 4-5x more for the same amount of work

  • @bamabby010
    @bamabby010 7 місяців тому +69

    They literally just posted an update my dude, impeccable timing xD

  • @Aaron-zu3xn
    @Aaron-zu3xn 7 місяців тому +17

    they really thought 3 million people were gonna be like "yeah sure we'll pay" and they were gonna cash in..too bad people watch youtube because it's free

    • @SoManyRandomRamblings
      @SoManyRandomRamblings 7 місяців тому +4

      I think some creators forget that the subscriber counts are total from the very start of the channel, not who is currently into watching them. Unless people go out of their way to unsubscribe it gives them a false sense of popularity.

  • @TheMedicatedArtist
    @TheMedicatedArtist 7 місяців тому +18

    Never thought a creator I actually cared about would get this much backlash, let alone the Ghoul Boys.
    Glad it was just a misguided business idea and not a genuine crime.

  • @MrJustapersn
    @MrJustapersn 7 місяців тому +5

    $6 a month is a lot for content from one creator. Consider how much you can get out of a Netflix or prime membership for a similar price. Their content just isn’t worth that much

  • @Ratzfourtyfour
    @Ratzfourtyfour 7 місяців тому +4

    Watchers: Become laughing stock for less than $6 a month.

  • @thetruestar6348
    @thetruestar6348 7 місяців тому +50

    Rooster Teeth tried this SAME THING with RWBY and their other shows it turned out horrible

    • @Dking1998
      @Dking1998 7 місяців тому +1

      Rooster teeth will getting shutdown next month it's parent company warnerbrother discovery announced it and it was because they were making these same mistakes and other bad ones.

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому +4

      Rooster Teeth tried this SAME THING with RWBY and their other shows it turned out horrible

    • @moonlightwolf
      @moonlightwolf 7 місяців тому +7

      Exactly! I feel like I'm watching Rooster Teeth's downfall all over again

    • @if7723
      @if7723 7 місяців тому

      But you could always watch RWBY for free, you just had to wait.

  • @tombstoneranch69
    @tombstoneranch69 7 місяців тому +77

    Buzzfeed has been in a state of brutal denial since their downfall began.

  • @AbstractlyDelen
    @AbstractlyDelen 7 місяців тому +35

    We liked watching them spend Buzzfeeds money to buy ridiculously expensive things. I’m not about to give them my money (that I barely have) so they can continue their extravagant lifestyles

    • @Theunicorn2012
      @Theunicorn2012 7 місяців тому

      We like watching them spend Buzzfeeds money to buy ridiculously expensive things. I’m not about to give them my money (that I barely have) so they can continue their extravagant lifestyles

    • @AbstractlyDelen
      @AbstractlyDelen 7 місяців тому +2

      @@Theunicorn2012 why did you rewrite my comment?

    • @SoManyRandomRamblings
      @SoManyRandomRamblings 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@@AbstractlyDelen they have been doing it to others on other comments too. It's a weird thing to do.

    • @victoryuan2319
      @victoryuan2319 7 місяців тому +3

      ​​@@SoManyRandomRamblings I think they might be a bot, that or they're 12

  • @anonview
    @anonview 7 місяців тому +2

    The reason I didn't follow these guys onto Watcher was because they changed their content format. I honestly preferred it when they were just two guys sitting at a desk, going over unsolved and mysterious cases, with the finale being an overnight trip to a haunted location. That was it. No need for the extra bells and whistles.

  • @farrismusicofficial
    @farrismusicofficial 7 місяців тому +2

    As someone who was introduced to buzzfeed unsolved during covid, I absolutely loved Shane, Ryan, & their videos. Their chemistry is top tier. When buzzfeed unsolved went under, I sadly didn’t keep up with Watcher after that. And it was simply cause other things started catching my eye first.
    With all that said, I had no clue who Steven was before all of this. I have no idea if he’s been behind the scenes/friend this whole time, or he came along when watcher started. But his statement alone and the amount of time he spoke on these videos compared to Ryan and Shane, kinda makes it seem like this was all his idea.

  • @chelsea_withan_a618
    @chelsea_withan_a618 7 місяців тому +9

    I appreciate your take on this one! I’ve watched a few commentary videos about this situation and I really hadn’t thought about the fact that it would be cannibalizing their own user base by having little to no growth opportunities without UA-cam. Smart take!

  • @b1krain539
    @b1krain539 7 місяців тому +22

    I understand why they took the leap, but at the same time don't let greed be your downfall.

  • @wape1
    @wape1 7 місяців тому +15

    These are the people that don't realize that their whole career was propped up by venture capital and that they're lucky to have a career *at all* after it dried up.

  • @GeorgeSavrille
    @GeorgeSavrille 7 місяців тому +3

    Wow, came expecting drama, but much more interested in the business-side analysis. Very interesting to hear. More content on you talking about that in specific case studies would be awesome.

  • @DemiAnunnaki
    @DemiAnunnaki 7 місяців тому +3

    Man, I've been enjoying sipping my tea and watching all these reaction videos to what they've done to themselves today. So entertaining.

  • @shoresy6943
    @shoresy6943 7 місяців тому +14

    Steven thought he'll be dining in steaks covered in gold again. 😂

  • @cookingwithsilence
    @cookingwithsilence 7 місяців тому +18

    Does anybody remember that one kickstarter crap episode where those post college kids just tried to get people to fund their global luxury travel plans in exchange for the experience of watching a documentary about them travelling around?

    • @Cozyhorrorshow
      @Cozyhorrorshow 7 місяців тому +2

      Oh my God that’s exactly what this is! I forgot about that!

    • @KelseyDrummer
      @KelseyDrummer 7 місяців тому +2

      Holy shit I forgot about that! Wow time flies.

    • @kvasir8931
      @kvasir8931 7 місяців тому +2

      Havent heard about that. Please tell me they failed?

    • @cookingwithsilence
      @cookingwithsilence 7 місяців тому

      ​@@kvasir8931they did!

  • @BenCarverGraphics
    @BenCarverGraphics 7 місяців тому +44

    "Can we watch Try Guys?" "We have Try Guys at home"

    • @EeveeBoi777
      @EeveeBoi777 7 місяців тому +2

      Dang it, I wanted to see the cheating scandal unfold

  • @godaithelesser4292
    @godaithelesser4292 7 місяців тому +2

    It's simple: take a page out of corridor's book. Put your really high budget stuff on the website and start some exclusive web-series and move one or two really popular series over to the website, and have some other stuff like shenanigans, behind the scenes, clips, etc and advertise the more exclusive stuff through UA-cam. By doing it like Watcher did, you're basically cutting the head of your business. Doing it like corridor means fans can still enjoy some free content, and also bring people to the website. And since you're still posting to youtube, you can ensure new fans can come to your website and possibly sign up.

  • @vivalanina
    @vivalanina 7 місяців тому +22

    Rhett and link made good mythical evening for this purpose. So they could do all the fun wacky uncensored adult things, cursing, drinking, sexual topics etc. and sold tickets to watch it. Does everyone want to pay for it, no. But is the content elevated enough from their free daily content for that to be worth it to some people and make them curious for a one time ticket? Yes. But there's no way I'd pay extra for the same content I've been getting for free this whole time. Watcher has lost 90K subs over this already.

  • @bulkvanderhuge9006
    @bulkvanderhuge9006 7 місяців тому +12

    One youtuber showed what Watcher makes, they make around $520K a year on UA-cam, then, they have around 2,901 Patreons, even if the Patrons are only paying $5 each, that's around $63,000. What watcher is failing to see here is, that UA-cam is providing Watcher with the Bandwidth and the Streaming FOR FREE, and once Watcher starts it's own Streaming Service, the Bandwidth and Streaming is going to be coming out of THEIR pockets. An expensive they currently don't have while they're on UA-cam. They're also giving up ALL of their Ad Revenue as well.
    They are going to Hemorrhage money.

    • @sacb0y
      @sacb0y 7 місяців тому

      It's not that hard to host videos if it's your own content now days. Especially a subscription platform where every viewer is paying.

    • @bulkvanderhuge9006
      @bulkvanderhuge9006 7 місяців тому +2

      @@sacb0y Bandwidth costs money

  • @Bread-nx9fo
    @Bread-nx9fo 7 місяців тому +14

    They did do an apology video today, hopefully they fully learned from this mistake and bounce back. But man, this precedent of putting paywalls over everything is super obnoxious, just because they learned from their mistakes and wont do it, wont stop other youtubers from trying this.

  • @TruFrag
    @TruFrag 7 місяців тому +3

    I don't get it, brand deals...? Like, you shouldn't need to do a paid service at all if you have their kinda numbers.
    If you do a subscription service, it should be an extra thing that your devoted fans will support. Something you use to reward those devoted fans with regular behind the scenes and exclusive extras, a physical gift 1-4 times a year, AND release your content early through the service. Rhett and Link, Good Mythical Morning, their Mythical Society is literally the model these guys and really any big UA-cam channel should be following. I support GMM at the highest tier of Mythical Society because I actually feel like I get real value from it.
    GMM isn't the only paid UA-camr service that I pay for, it's just literally the best model I've personally seen. It's a great way of turning a Parasocial relationship into an actual substance based relationship

  • @AAA_NNN_DDD
    @AAA_NNN_DDD 7 місяців тому +3

    i think an interesting parallel to this is the way game changers is absolutely dominating youtube shorts right now, at least for me. its almost identical, a company that used to run on youtube (college humor) made an exclusive platform to host their shows (dropout). i can see some tangible differences in how they handled it, it's just hard to articulate

  • @FreedomDiaries1
    @FreedomDiaries1 7 місяців тому +5

    Part of the reason why it's so successful is because it was free. I don't know why they thought that people would be willing to pay for another subscription service.

  • @nycpizzarat
    @nycpizzarat 7 місяців тому +27

    LMAOO atozy!! your timing!! 😂😂😂

    • @atozy
      @atozy  7 місяців тому +26

      COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER WOW F IN CHAT

    • @Unfortunately_Mickey
      @Unfortunately_Mickey 7 місяців тому +7

      ​@atozy just make a REAL quick update and you're fine 😂