I believe Karen Read is innocent!! and its very clear by just how Bev the bias judge is behaving to the defense!!! Bev keepings sighing none stop when the defense asks questions, calling sidebar for stupid stuff, sustaining all their questions all the time so the truth doesn't come out!!!... 🤯 She's not behaving like a neutral judge!!!
No. The more I hear the more I believe this small town first responders are all complicit. For the officers to NEVER question the police officer and wife whose home this was in front of, cements that belief.
I was impressed with this witness and find him truthful. I was also impressed with his dedication to his job and helping others. He has no reason to be involved in a cover up.
@@Jmmw25 Well, if he did have a puffy jacket on, this witness is the only one that saw it and it is not in evidence. If this testimony is correct, where is the jacket? Is it lost like John O'keefe's belt?????
I think one of her ‘friends’ (the other females with her on scene) planted that idea in her head, (told her she hit him), and Karen is trying to remember what happened, or is stating that as a question. Nuttall was my fave witness so far. Seemed honest and genuine.
I have no side and this witness seems honest,I saw others witness and my point of view is that she did unintentionally I ask my self, if she would testify to clear what really happened. I think she is guilty with less charger.she said it was her fault she hit it, she changed her the story because the defense attorney always tells their client to never admitted until the end that they would see if they can win the case.
@@JustKatTalkingThere’s no way she would know that. Just like your neighbors are unaware that you’re cooking ❄️ in your kitchen;Karen doesnt know what goes on behind closed doors. That doesnt make her guilty
At 12.30am, there was barely any snow. Where is the patch of grass underneath his body? His body was found on compressed snow. Head injuries bleed profusely. Where is the pool of blood? Lacerations, claws, furrows to his arm, no blood on the car, nor glass or tailight. So, how did he sustain these injuries?
The home owner (Brian Albert) had a dog with a history of putting 2 seperate individuals in the ER because of attacks. The dog was present in the home that night, and since the night of the murder has mysteryously "disapeared". The pool of blood was inside that home. I would like to see if the water main spiked during that period to show they were washing/ cleaning/ scrubbing evidence
@@T-coon Please illuminate for the undereducated... The only witness testimony I heard from every first responder - 4-6 inches under body, with a dusting/light covering. So the biting Lexus also levitated Officer O'Keefe body for 5 hours during the blizzard. The technology and active federal investigation disclosures of grand jury perjury, police corruption and evidence tampering disclosed during pretrial motions this is a frame job and is all done.
Even if she did say “I hit him” ,the evidence says she didn’t. Unless you believe that cars have teeth & that someone is capable of controlling a vehicle while reversing on ice at 20+mph
And only having a cracked/broken taillight from a 6 foot 200 lb man hitting him at 26mph. I’m not buying any of it tbh. Everything around this case is so sketchy.
@@thatssus6045I completely agree. You’d expect to see more damage to a vehicle if it had impacted a grown man hard enough to do what is alleged by the state in this case.
@@thatssus6045there's a video of her 5 hours after this supposed hit-and-run and the tail light is completely intact. You can pause the video and see it plain as day when she hits the brakes. Maybe a crack ,but that's it. According to the prosecution there are 40 pieces on the lawn at 34 Fairview from 5 hours earlier. They must be magic tail light pieces 🙄
Karen said I HIT HIM END OF STORY ,SHE THEN TRIED TO GET OUT OF IT." SHE KNEW THERE WAS NO ONE ELSE TO LOOK FOR AT THE TIME OF HER MURDERING JOHN. WHY CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS..?.. She confessed and was distraught at the scene and never once was upset at who did this
She said I hit him?? I hit him?? The sentence was a question. Not a statement. Listen to the video. Are you related to the Alberts or McKabe. It sure sounds like it.
@@Lunareclipse9 But why would she 𝘢𝘴𝘬 that? No one there told the EMT, etc., "Karen hit him." If they did, then I could understand her asking, "𝗜 hit him?" (No shade; just an observation.)
Reads' defense is again trying to discredit this witness by questioning his hearing the Defendants' statements saying, "I hit him, I hit him." Does it matter who she said this to?
Why did every single first responder hear something different and every single first responder said they did not hear what the first responder on the stand before them said that they heard.
Do all first responders stand about listening to the one person? Or do they have individual interactions in between doing their job/gathering information?
If this is truly the then please explain to me as to why there wasn't any debris from the plastic tail light in the wounds on the victim or why wasn't any pieces of a red reflective tail lens found in or on the victims clothes or why there wasn't any of the fore mentioned read reflective debris from the tail lens found in on the stretcher or the ambulance floor or on the hospital bed or hospital floor ????, regardless I'm a retired firefighter and have assisted on more than one occasion on calls similar as this AND always the victim and their clothing contain evidence headlight fragments turn signal fragments embedded in your skin obviously embedded in their clothing and when we had to clean the rig out they were fragments found on the floor of the rig also, so yeah something is absolutely wrong here!!!!
He was wearing a long sleeved sweat shirt. Wouldn't that explain no debris in the wounds? My husband was bit by a dog pretty bad and it didn't tear his clothes at all.
Also he has puncture marks on his arm, I can’t imagine a car causing punctures to someone unless it was maybe glass or something but like you said there was no glass in those wounds or his clothing or anywhere except where they say they found all those pieces later on sidewalk area I believe
A big cover-up from the Boston Police Department, victim got in a fight obviously in the house of a fellow police officer that owned a police k9dog, homeowners dog obviously chewed on his arm, and then was tossed out on the front lawn and died, prosecutors Witnesses can't even get their story close to being similar.
@@r.g6170 absolutely looks like dog scratches from his teeth to me., conveniently for the homeowner the dog is gone and the home has been sold and that sounds very strange and suspicious to me.
@@r.g6170 no, nor do his injuries depict being “ beat up”. I just say a news clip of someone who was beat up their face was black and blue with immense swelling.
obviously she said it but this lawyer is paid thousands per hour for a reason he could sell you anything. Hes close to the level of casey anthony lawyer.
He is honest witness very clear and understanding,what the else are you looking for.she hit him,she hit him and she hit him,you got it remember she was drinking to much in two bar.i have alot experience when people drink because i used it i seem my husband drinking and making a lot mistake and i don't denied point and simple.
Memory is indeed a funny thing. Studies show that when a group of people witness an event they will almost always have some differences in what they perceived and experienced and therefore will have different memories when recalling what happened. To ascertain something close to the truth it is about looking for consistencies within the accounts. So if a few people remember her saying something about hitting him, then she almost certainly said something along those lines. Defense lawyers of course focus on inconsistency or any changes to make it seem like the witness is lying or unreliable, but memory changes and differences are exactly what you would expect.
The defense claims she was framed??makes no sense IMO so the cops or someone @ party thru John on the front lawn huh 🤔 really yeah ok this is ridiculous
You cant fathom that police officers beat another one up, tossed him outside then deflected the blame for what occurred onto an innocent woman but you can believe that Karen threw her car in reverse on snow covered roads, got the speed up to over 20mph, intentionally aimed it to hit John and he conveniently landed in the yard of a fellow police officer’s home? 🤣
My take on the Karen Read case after day 4 of the trial. I was put off by Karen's behavior even before the trial. She did public interviews proclaiming her innocence. In my opinion she has manipulated a large group of protesters based on what she says is the truth. I expected to see at trial that her defense was going to prove that all the witnesses for the prosecution were liars and part of this whole set up. Instead what her lawyers did was bully, badger and try and trick them into changing their stories. When the witnesses were asked certain questions and her lawyers didn't get the right answers they kept harping at them until they got them to admit that a few minor details had changed. The judge should have stopped that bullying after the question was asked and answered the first time round. Karen has been treating this trial like she is some kind of a celebrity super star. She is waving and smiling at her fans as she enters the court house. Her behavior is repulsive. The first day Karen appeared to be cocky and confident. She appeared to be running the whole show including her lawyers. I noticed her body language change once the witnesses began to testify one after the other stating she said she hit him. In my opinion to even suggest that fire fighters, LE and medics were all part of this conspiracy to frame her is a joke. In my opinion so far I believe this is what happened. I believe the relationship between Karen and John was falling apart and she knew it. She saw him kissing another woman and became angry. They were fighting about the kids all the time. It appeared the relationship was nearing its end. They were obviously on bad terms the day of the murder. I do not know why Karen did not attend that house party but it was clear she was very upset when she dropped John off. Karen was asked how many drinks she had before she dropped John off and she clearly lied and said 4 when it was proven she had at least 9 drinks. She was clearly very very drunk. It was clear to me she sped off from that house drunk and angry. I believe she backed into John and simply sped off. I also believe she knew she had hit him and that is why the search was done on how long it takes for a person to die in the cold. I believe she went home as she said and passed out drunk waking up at the early hours that morning. I believe she realized when he wasn't home that she may have hit him. She called friends pretending not to know what had happened but she does mention she had a cracked head light. The idea or suggestion that officers went to another location to retrieve pieces of her broken tail light to frame her was beyond a joke. I believe she called friends to make sure she had witnesses. I believe that horrific behavior at the scene was all planned and acted out. Karen never once says or even suggests that John had been killed by people in that house. This story came later and grew as time went on. I do believe Karen killed John in a drunk furious rage as she was leaving that house. I also believe she knew what she had done and still went home passed out and woke up a few hours later pretending not to know where John was. I don't believe she intentionally hit him but knowing she was drunk and would be facing serious criminal charges she decided to leave anyway and unfortunately John was not found by any members in that house before 5 am that morning. The fact that Karen immediately became worried about John and why he wasn't home proved to me she already knew where he was and what happened. She has already proven herself to be a liar and she did that on national tv in front of millions.
So triggered 😲.....is there anything you don't know ffs 😆 That Albert family sound like a right bunch of arrogant narcissistic arseholes! Are you related ?
O'Keefe phone data show 80 steps, 3 flights of stairs, 36 steps. 80 steps to the house. (1 floor), Going upstairs to look at pictures with Brian Albert and Higgings (Higging lied about never going upstairs), (1 floor) Going down. He was then lured to the basement where the gym equipment is (1 floor). He removed his jacket, thinking he was going to show his muscles and they jumped him, with the dog. That's why there is no tears on the jacket. He hit his head on the equipment, resulting in a big gash at the back of the head and fracture. His last 36 steps to defend his life.... 2.27am:Hos long to die in the cold McCabe woman 6.04am: McCab woman approached Officer O'Keefe, seized his phone.... Between 6.11 and 6.27am, O'Keefe's phone shows movements, going up and down floors....in the house.... Paramedics never saw the phone under his body, as stated in court documents.....
This explanation of you can be the right explained story for the cover up. I pray that will the case at the end for this poor woman, that was in destress and no one gave her comfort and she said things that was not making sense. And the people that wanted to frame her was with her to make out she said the things they wanted to hear.
@@EricKeen-ff5mwWho knows? Issues at work between O'Keefe n Brian Albert/issue with the nephew's behaviour, jealousy O'Keefe n Higgins. Accident? Who knows? They both destroyed their phone
@@MFC7625 so your telling me his phone O Kedfes was never found I thought they said it was under him…..how did they get all the data from him with where he traveled??
Saying, I hit him, she was questioning, incredulous, dumbfounded, she didnt have malicious intent, if she did have intent, she Would seem to be as guilty as hell!!
Also if she knew she had hit him I’m almost certain she wouldn’t be yelling or saying “I hit him” to anyone especially not police and paramedics/firefighters.
Not one dent in Read's car, after backing into a well over 200lb big healthy man, running him over in sonic fast reverse speed, John then Projectile flies into the air and lands in the front lawn; of which house not one cop searched. Great logic🥴. (The complete absence of blood on that lawn is in the basement Brian tore out after the crime; then poured concrete over the basement floor.) @COURTTV
Still can't get over why,noone came out of the house?!!!Which btw is being sold,log stock n barrel(including dog)was re-home!!!Also this is a long time:Fam home*Not forgetting(basement flr)remove
How come when the cops got there, if Karen knew who did it, why didn’t she say something? Why didn’t she say “the people in the house did this” something along those lines… she’s guilty
He's the only one who saw a puffed jacket... He didn't testify the same to Proctor and what he said on the stand. One version was that she was talking to someone else and now she's talking to him. Go and see the cross examination with Katie McLaughlin. And we have a third version....
@EricKeen-ff5mw That's what I meant..Did he have one when she dropped him off?? The whole thing is confusing. They kept saying at first he was lying in the driveway..but now it seems he was way across the front yard on the lawn..Things are not making sence.
How many first responders are going to be called to say the same things? Why isn’t the prosecutor calling the lead investigator to the stand? Prosecutors list of witnesses is something like 77. It’s going to be a long trial. Taxpayers dollars hard at work. 🙄
Everyone should have the right to a long and - if need be - exhaustive trial. A life was taken, and another's is at stake. Entertaining its public is about the last thing it needs.
@@EC-dz3fb if this is the best the CW has then they’re in big trouble. Most CW witnesses have started out cocky and were impeached easily. Yes, every accused person deserves a fair trial where the judge is fair and impartial. She’s playing judge and prosecution, objecting more than the real prosecutor. This trial is a sham and Massachusetts deserves better.
@@EC-dz3fb fair enough. This UA-cam channel seems to be filled with people believing the garbage the CW is spewing. I didn’t think any critical thinkers would be here. I stand corrected.
You can be sure they're not going to just volunteer that information. .. the dog was giving away and the house has been sold since this incident.... play let's just keep saying nothing to see their.
The homeowner is a highly trained. MMA fighter ( and Bpd boxing team member). Sgt detective on fugitive team. And a highly trained first responder, did not come out of his house!! All facts !! Very tragic
No one ever did test that people that was in the house. And they never tested for John's DNA to see if he was in that house. Because the police said he got struck with her car when she droped him at the house, and he never went in then.
@@mauiswift6391 I was a young boy who was raised to be a man. And I know what beating up and getting beaten is!! In the ring and on the street!!! Kids these days can’t argue without shootings. And that’s cowardice
I agree, atleast in terms of this guy remembering so many details, except of course the "big heavy coat" he was wearing lol lol though I can't say it's his memory that tips me off because I have an excellent memory lol lol too bad I don't think she did it so I still don't trust these witnesses 😂😂
Nobody familiar with the case trusts anything in the prosecution! Firefighter Kate ( driver who somehow took control of official report Instead of the squad leader Committed perjury saying over and over and over she is not friends with the Albert family She got caught!! The world is seeing all kinds of vacation pictures with the family
Why did Karen Read assume her boyfriend was in the snow on the front lawn? I would have thought she could have assumed that he was passed out on a sofa in the house. Her actions in my opinion is that she was really drunk when she hit him in rage, but drove home in a drunken stupor. Later, she probably sprung up out of bed with a bad feeling that she probably did something really really stupid! She probably was hoping it was just a bad dream. Unfortunately, when she arrived at the scene, reality hit her smack in the face! Her remorse was genuine, but people do stupid things when they are drunk.
Karens texts to John also show multiple lies. She texts the kids are home alone and shes in Mansfield along with vulgarities. Then later states she was at Johns...sooo Which was it?
Important view Reads interview with ABC she states she sees John walk to door. She later states she didnt say she hit him..she wondered if she did unknowingly. How could anyone possibly hit someone if they were at the door as she claims? As far as cuts on johns arm..if a dog attacked the clothing would certainly show destruction. What was found on Johns clothing? Possibly those injuries were there prior to this night?
It's becoming clear there is no cover-up. I can't believe people would even believe that anyway. Karen either accidentally hit John and it was not intentional, which is probably what happened. Or she's a downright murderer.. I don't think it was intentional. I'm glad all those "this is a cover-up, free Karen" comments are becoming rarer and rarer by the day. There's no cover-up. Let's try to figure out if it was intentional or not.
I think people are in denial if they don't think this is a cover up. Caitlin Albert googled how long it takes for a body to freeze in the cold, Albert's were never questioned, mr. Albert didn't even come out. The next week the dog was put down, the basement floor redone. Maybe people don't want to admit its cover up because it will be pandora box, a slew of other cover ups and corruption. Free karen read!
@@missmelissz See, this is what gets me. If someone's gonna say sh×t like this, at least get correct what 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 sides agree on and what's in the court documents: it was 𝗝𝗲𝗻 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝗮𝗯𝗲 who Googled "Hos long to die in cold." Not Caitlyn Albert. Not Karen Read. Not Rhianna. Not Buzz Lightyear. Not Jimmy Fallon.
I have zero knowledge of this case before the trial started. But after week 1, my opinion today is that SOMETHING is being covered up. All of the stories up to now are so different. Especially the last fire fighter Katie. That testimony was all over the place.
Her actions during the fiasco is clear indication of a guilt trip.Not even a mother of a dead baby will act like that.I am sure they will cry but they won't be running around like crazy people. Of course that with other things that she said and did like woking up panicking when there was no need to panick.
Totally, because every single person reacts exactly the same during a traumatic event. Also, you clearly aren't a parent to be making such an asinine comparison like that. I WOULD be acting like a total whack job if something happened to my child. Gtfo
You differently never went through a panic event in your life, or you just don't got a feeling for human. She was getting a panic attack, when she saw him.
Yeah, as soon as he said big winter coat, I was like uhhh nooo.... he had a sweatshirt on. Lol but that came out that he maybe didn't remember correctly and didn't remove his clothes. I guess proper attire for me in that weather would be 3 pairs of pants, boots and a coat with multiple layers under it, my Son..shorts and a sweatshirt lol 😆
@@JustKatTalking I mean this case & LE & the Albert's reputation in that town & they're all connected with these other cops & the girl paramedic on the stand committed Perjury by the pictures she was shown & Proctor was called to answer already for his messing up this case to a Grand Jury. Better educate yourself on this one because it's horrible corruption 😞
@@pinwheel1212 I wasn’t even aware there had been a request until I heard Emily D Baker mention it on her livestream. My jaw dropped!😳 In my untrained mind in judicial protocol, there just seems to be the possibility of collusion or conflict of interest with so many local LEO involved. 🤷🏻♀️
Is it me or does the judge seem biased.? It could be me.. Maybe something else is going on but why is she only allowing a few things to be published to the Jury & sustain other important questions not being allowed by the defense. 😮
Presuming Karen Reed was framed- Did the bad actors assault and kill the victim unintentionally and then came up with a scenario so KR could be framed?
I think it was a fight, fell back hit his head, and of course, everyone freaked out.... can't have a dead cop in another cops house! So unintentionally, this is just my opinion. I believe they thought put him out and make it seem like the snow plow hit him. They didn't think it'd take sooo long for someone to see him, nor possibly consider that Karen would be up soooo early and be the one to find him. But once she did, the narrative changed... this is obviously a frame job. Everyone lying on the stand, and nothing in any reports until Proctor? That is fishy, the judge is just as bad(biased) and has tie with that family too! For her not to allow photos proving that paramedic Katie Mclaughlin, that lied over and over again about her friendship with the homeowners, daughter Caitlin makes no sense! And there are tons of photos with those 2 together arms interlocked, and they ran track together! Say you knew her, used to be friends or w/e, but to say I went to school with a Caitlin Albert and only an acquaintance. Why lie, unless you're hiding something...
Absolutely not.. the reaction he is trying to paint is one of immediate shock. If she had hit him, it would have been hours before, and she would not be reacting like that. I believe he thinks he's speaking the truth but she did not say that
Why Proctor had to see McLaughlin on 01.30, but he only saw the lead paramedic who had the report on 02.08 or 02.14? He knew McLaughlin was besties with Caitlyn Albert....
Poor guy seems to shows how nervous he is just being on the stand. Must be daunting answering questions in court. Just not sure if this guys telling all the truth.
Is it that difficult to tell if someone was hit by a car with the car present,, is this case for the purpose for viewers??? There's a missing piece to the puzzle 🧩🥶🤒🤔
#CourtTV - What do YOU think?
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?
I believe Karen Read is innocent!! and its very clear by just how Bev the bias judge is behaving to the defense!!! Bev keepings sighing none stop when the defense asks questions, calling sidebar for stupid stuff, sustaining all their questions all the time so the truth doesn't come out!!!... 🤯 She's not behaving like a neutral judge!!!
enjoy your content, unable to post comments. have i been blocked?
Lol, you just did.
@@anotherfishinthesea8660 lmao i damn sure did...ok ima go back and see what my clusterhuck was! Thank you
No. The more I hear the more I believe this small town first responders are all complicit. For the officers to NEVER question the police officer and wife whose home this was in front of, cements that belief.
Having half a town complicit and expecting everyone to keep their mouths shut is a completely insane concept.
Something isn't adding up.
Idk if she's guilty or innocent but this is a mess.
@@m0eMoEright 😂🎉
small town? canton is huge its massachusetts not rural alabama!
I was impressed with this witness and find him truthful. I was also impressed with his dedication to his job and helping others. He has no reason to be involved in a cover up.
He was coached in regards to her statement. But not coached enough and stated he cut a puffy heavy jacket off of the officer. Victim had no jacket.
@@bobg2092you have absolutely no idea if that’s true or not. Yet you say it
@@Jmmw25from my recollection, he was not wearing a jacket. It was stated it was a hoodie.
@@Jmmw25 Well, if he did have a puffy jacket on, this witness is the only one that saw it and it is not in evidence. If this testimony is correct, where is the jacket? Is it lost like John O'keefe's belt?????
As innocent as he looks, I think he’s sketchy there’s something about him that I can’t trust
He clearly is telling the truth and its a shame people like you are attacking someone for being honest and ethical in their work.
@ i never said he was a liar nor attacked him. I just said to me his sketchy and there is SOMETHING ABOUT HIM i can’t trust.
Everyone is missing the huge red flag here. Not once did Karen ever scream out they killed him. I believe she came up with that story after the fact.
If you follow the case you will know why
Of course and with the help of her Hollywood's lawyer.
I think one of her ‘friends’ (the other females with her on scene) planted that idea in her head, (told her she hit him), and Karen is trying to remember what happened, or is stating that as a question.
Nuttall was my fave witness so far. Seemed honest and genuine.
I have no side and this witness seems honest,I saw others witness and my point of view is that she did unintentionally I ask my self, if she would testify to clear what really happened. I think she is guilty with less charger.she said it was her fault she hit it, she changed her the story because the defense attorney always tells their client to never admitted until the end that they would see if they can win the case.
Why would she know that at that point?? He could have been hit by a plow truck.
yes, she did confess in a round about way.
Good solid honest witness
Oh the trump trial!! Ya I agree the witnesses are great !!we are watching something else
She did not hit him. She was hysterical and in trauma. I pray none of u have to live thru what she did
WTF is "in trauma"?
@@aztec0112question WTF is wrong with you ? You know exactly what she meant. But you had to ask a stupid question anyway.🤔
Why didn’t she say “the people in the house did it” if she knew or thought that
@@JustKatTalkingThere’s no way she would know that. Just like your neighbors are unaware that you’re cooking ❄️ in your kitchen;Karen doesnt know what goes on behind closed doors. That doesnt make her guilty
@@notsorryyouretriggered ok, so since you know the answer to everything. When and how did she supposedly learn about this happening inside the house?
At 12.30am, there was barely any snow. Where is the patch of grass underneath his body? His body was found on compressed snow.
Head injuries bleed profusely. Where is the pool of blood?
Lacerations, claws, furrows to his arm, no blood on the car, nor glass or tailight. So, how did he sustain these injuries?
You are incorrect on so many points.
@tracybarber8961 which points?
@@tracybarber8961They're ignorant so don't bother trying to educate 😞
The home owner (Brian Albert) had a dog with a history of putting 2 seperate individuals in the ER because of attacks. The dog was present in the home that night, and since the night of the murder has mysteryously "disapeared". The pool of blood was inside that home. I would like to see if the water main spiked during that period to show they were washing/ cleaning/ scrubbing evidence
@@T-coon
Please illuminate for the undereducated...
The only witness testimony I heard from every first responder - 4-6 inches under body, with a dusting/light covering.
So the biting Lexus also levitated Officer O'Keefe body for 5 hours during the blizzard.
The technology and active federal investigation disclosures of grand jury perjury, police corruption and evidence tampering disclosed during pretrial motions this is a frame job and is all done.
Even if she did say “I hit him” ,the evidence says she didn’t. Unless you believe that cars have teeth & that someone is capable of controlling a vehicle while reversing on ice at 20+mph
And only having a cracked/broken taillight from a 6 foot 200 lb man hitting him at 26mph. I’m not buying any of it tbh. Everything around this case is so sketchy.
@@thatssus6045I completely agree. You’d expect to see more damage to a vehicle if it had impacted a grown man hard enough to do what is alleged by the state in this case.
@@thatssus6045there's a video of her 5 hours after this supposed hit-and-run and the tail light is completely intact. You can pause the video and see it plain as day when she hits the brakes. Maybe a crack ,but that's it. According to the prosecution there are 40 pieces on the lawn at 34 Fairview from 5 hours earlier. They must be magic tail light pieces 🙄
Right??!! This whole thing STINKS!!!
Karen said I HIT HIM END OF STORY ,SHE THEN TRIED TO GET OUT OF IT." SHE KNEW THERE WAS NO ONE ELSE TO LOOK FOR AT THE TIME OF HER MURDERING JOHN. WHY CANT PEOPLE SEE THIS..?.. She confessed and was distraught at the scene and never once was upset at who did this
She said I hit him?? I hit him?? The sentence was a question. Not a statement. Listen to the video. Are you related to the Alberts or McKabe. It sure sounds like it.
@@Lunareclipse9 But why would she 𝘢𝘴𝘬 that? No one there told the EMT, etc., "Karen hit him." If they did, then I could understand her asking, "𝗜 hit him?" (No shade; just an observation.)
U can definitely tell this witness is way more confident when asked questions by the state than the defense hahaha
No
Reads' defense is again trying to discredit this witness by questioning his hearing the Defendants' statements saying, "I hit him, I hit him." Does it matter who she said this to?
Did the first responders, (LE, Paramedics, firefighters), know that the property where John’s body lay belonged to a fellow police officer?
Why did every single first responder hear something different and every single first responder said they did not hear what the first responder on the stand before them said that they heard.
I know right hahahha
EXACTLY what I was thinking!!! No OTHER first responder heard those “statements”
First responders are moving about all the time so would not all hear the same things at the same time
Do all first responders stand about listening to the one person? Or do they have individual interactions in between doing their job/gathering information?
People desperate for a gotcha moment 😂
If this is truly the then please explain to me as to why there wasn't any debris from the plastic tail light in the wounds on the victim or why wasn't any pieces of a red reflective tail lens found in or on the victims clothes or why there wasn't any of the fore mentioned read reflective debris from the tail lens found in on the stretcher or the ambulance floor or on the hospital bed or hospital floor ????, regardless I'm a retired firefighter and have assisted on more than one occasion on calls similar as this AND always the victim and their clothing contain evidence headlight fragments turn signal fragments embedded in your skin obviously embedded in their clothing and when we had to clean the rig out they were fragments found on the floor of the rig also, so yeah something is absolutely wrong here!!!!
He was wearing a long sleeved sweat shirt. Wouldn't that explain no debris in the wounds? My husband was bit by a dog pretty bad and it didn't tear his clothes at all.
Also he has puncture marks on his arm, I can’t imagine a car causing punctures to someone unless it was maybe glass or something but like you said there was no glass in those wounds or his clothing or anywhere except where they say they found all those pieces later on sidewalk area I believe
Microscopic bits of taillight were (allegedly) in the victim's shirt.
Stop e we it’s crazy conspiracies 😂 yea ems covering up wounds for police 👮 sure 👍
@@EC-dz3fb Oh ok! I hadn’t heard that yet, I will be listening out for that evidence in trial.
A big cover-up from the Boston Police Department, victim got in a fight obviously in the house of a fellow police officer that owned a police k9dog, homeowners dog obviously chewed on his arm, and then was tossed out on the front lawn and died, prosecutors Witnesses can't even get their story close to being similar.
Yet the only fact established is JO was found on the front lawn.
they dont seem like dog bites to me honestly. i got bit by a dog on my arm and they leave teeth marks. i cant see that shape
@@mauiswift6391of a Boston Police officer’s home…
@@r.g6170 absolutely looks like dog scratches from his teeth to me., conveniently for the homeowner the dog is gone and the home has been sold and that sounds very strange and suspicious to me.
@@r.g6170 no, nor do his injuries depict being “ beat up”. I just say a news clip of someone who was beat up their face was black and blue with immense swelling.
Screaming and yelling and a Boston cop doesn’t come out of his house
Did the people across come out? What about the neighbors?
@@maanmohammad8459 nobody came out.
@@maanmohammad8459 the home owners did not come out.
@@mauiswift6391
Exactly.
obviously she said it but this lawyer is paid thousands per hour for a reason he could sell you anything. Hes close to the level of casey anthony lawyer.
Curious about your thoughts on all the lies and inconsistencies and coverups as demonstrated by the first responders. Do you have any thoughts?
“ I hit him I hit him I hit him”. Why on earth would this paramedic have any reason to lie about that. Karen Reed is not worth any lie
He is honest witness very clear and understanding,what the else are you looking for.she hit him,she hit him and she hit him,you got it remember she was drinking to much in two bar.i have alot experience when people drink because i used it i seem my husband drinking and making a lot mistake and i don't denied point and simple.
Why does he repeat under his breath what he says sometimes? I’ve never seen this
I really thought all along she was guilty after starting to watch the trial, I am changing my mind
Memory is indeed a funny thing. Studies show that when a group of people witness an event they will almost always have some differences in what they perceived and experienced and therefore will have different memories when recalling what happened. To ascertain something close to the truth it is about looking for consistencies within the accounts. So if a few people remember her saying something about hitting him, then she almost certainly said something along those lines.
Defense lawyers of course focus on inconsistency or any changes to make it seem like the witness is lying or unreliable, but memory changes and differences are exactly what you would expect.
She confessed! It came out of her mouth! End of story!
too bad they dont ask about why any of the alberts never came out of the house...
They were passed out drunk maybe!
This wasn't right in front..it was more to the side and in between properties.
I believe in my heart he was beat up in the house by the cops that were in there. I believe she was framed. But only her and god knows.
You would be better off using your brain instead. What is logical, what makes sense and what is more likely?
@@TopCat8877take your own advice.
@@kirstinwhite1850 Thankfully the jury will be doing what I stated.
Karen better be prepared to spend the rest of her life in prison. She let John die in the cold. What a horrible person.
You would know horrible.
Ongoing federal investigation has already disclosed perjury, evidence tampering, and corrupt law enforcement, OH MY
She definitely did it.. maybe didn't fully realize at the time because of drinking but aware enough
What makes you say that?? I’m genuinely curious how people still think she’s guilty at this point.
The defense claims she was framed??makes no sense IMO so the cops or someone @ party thru John on the front lawn huh 🤔 really yeah ok this is ridiculous
Exactly
Well? Isn't it kinda curious that the responders to the scene of a death didn't question the homeowner? Maybe I missed that
You cant fathom that police officers beat another one up, tossed him outside then deflected the blame for what occurred onto an innocent woman but you can believe that Karen threw her car in reverse on snow covered roads, got the speed up to over 20mph, intentionally aimed it to hit John and he conveniently landed in the yard of a fellow police officer’s home?
🤣
@@DQ2you2
Or the neighbors,or the ones cross the street,or the drivers of cars(if there were any)?
It’s seriously smells wrong. Maybe you should kinda like dip into it deep dive the the case, instead of just passing judgment
My take on the Karen Read case after day 4 of the trial.
I was put off by Karen's behavior even before the trial. She did public interviews proclaiming her innocence. In my opinion she has manipulated a large group of protesters based on what she says is the truth.
I expected to see at trial that her defense was going to prove that all the witnesses for the prosecution were liars and part of this whole set up. Instead what her lawyers did was bully, badger and try and trick them into changing their stories. When the witnesses were asked certain questions and her lawyers didn't get the right answers they kept harping at them until they got them to admit that a few minor details had changed. The judge should have stopped that bullying after the question was asked and answered the first time round.
Karen has been treating this trial like she is some kind of a celebrity super star. She is waving and smiling at her fans as she enters the court house. Her behavior is repulsive.
The first day Karen appeared to be cocky and confident. She appeared to be running the whole show including her lawyers.
I noticed her body language change once the witnesses began to testify one after the other stating she said she hit him.
In my opinion to even suggest that fire fighters, LE and medics were all part of this conspiracy to frame her is a joke.
In my opinion so far I believe this is what happened.
I believe the relationship between Karen and John was falling apart and she knew it. She saw him kissing another woman and became angry. They were fighting about the kids all the time. It appeared the relationship was nearing its end.
They were obviously on bad terms the day of the murder. I do not know why Karen did not attend that house party but it was clear she was very upset when she dropped John off.
Karen was asked how many drinks she had before she dropped John off and she clearly lied and said 4 when it was proven she had at least 9 drinks. She was clearly very very drunk.
It was clear to me she sped off from that house drunk and angry.
I believe she backed into John and simply sped off. I also believe she knew she had hit him and that is why the search was done on how long it takes for a person to die in the cold.
I believe she went home as she said and passed out drunk waking up at the early hours that morning. I believe she realized when he wasn't home that she may have hit him.
She called friends pretending not to know what had happened but she does mention she had a cracked head light.
The idea or suggestion that officers went to another location to retrieve pieces of her broken tail light to frame her was beyond a joke.
I believe she called friends to make sure she had witnesses. I believe that horrific behavior at the scene was all planned and acted out.
Karen never once says or even suggests that John had been killed by people in that house. This story came later and grew as time went on.
I do believe Karen killed John in a drunk furious rage as she was leaving that house. I also believe she knew what she had done and still went home passed out and woke up a few hours later pretending not to know where John was.
I don't believe she intentionally hit him but knowing she was drunk and would be facing serious criminal charges she decided to leave anyway and unfortunately John was not found by any members in that house before 5 am that morning.
The fact that Karen immediately became worried about John and why he wasn't home proved to me she already knew where he was and what happened. She has already proven herself to be a liar and she did that on national tv in front of millions.
Best and most concise explanation yet! How anyone can believe anything else is crazy!
So triggered 😲.....is there anything you don't know ffs 😆 That Albert family sound like a right bunch of arrogant narcissistic arseholes! Are you related ?
O'Keefe phone data show 80 steps, 3 flights of stairs, 36 steps. 80 steps to the house. (1 floor), Going upstairs to look at pictures with Brian Albert and Higgings (Higging lied about never going upstairs), (1 floor) Going down. He was then lured to the basement where the gym equipment is (1 floor). He removed his jacket, thinking he was going to show his muscles and they jumped him, with the dog. That's why there is no tears on the jacket. He hit his head on the equipment, resulting in a big gash at the back of the head and fracture. His last 36 steps to defend his life....
2.27am:Hos long to die in the cold McCabe woman
6.04am: McCab woman approached Officer O'Keefe, seized his phone....
Between 6.11 and 6.27am, O'Keefe's phone shows movements, going up and down floors....in the house....
Paramedics never saw the phone under his body, as stated in court documents.....
This explanation of you can be the right explained story for the cover up. I pray that will the case at the end for this poor woman, that was in destress and no one gave her comfort and she said things that was not making sense. And the people that wanted to frame her was with her to make out she said the things they wanted to hear.
My question what caused the fight?
@@EricKeen-ff5mwWho knows? Issues at work between O'Keefe n Brian Albert/issue with the nephew's behaviour, jealousy O'Keefe n Higgins. Accident? Who knows? They both destroyed their phone
@@MFC7625 both phones???
@@MFC7625 so your telling me his phone O Kedfes was never found I thought they said it was under him…..how did they get all the data from him with where he traveled??
Karen Read is Guilty!!! End of story!
Everyone heard different shyt .. amazing 😂
But that is always the case.Even eye witness account differe from one person to another.
The one consistent thing was “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him”. That can’t be unsaid or put back in the bottle.
@TopCat8877 That was absolutely not consistent, thanks for proving my point 😅
@@TopCat8877 unsaid ?? Or put back in the bottle?? They can’t even agree on what she said 😂😂
@@jamesallen2851 Don’t know what you were watching, but at least 4 witnesses said the exact words “ I hit him”. As a statement, not a question.
Saying, I hit him, she was questioning, incredulous, dumbfounded,
she didnt have malicious intent, if she did have intent, she Would seem to be as guilty as hell!!
Just out of curiosity, how do you really know???
Also if she knew she had hit him I’m almost certain she wouldn’t be yelling or saying “I hit him” to anyone especially not police and paramedics/firefighters.
Not one dent in Read's car, after backing into a well over 200lb big healthy man, running him over in sonic fast reverse speed, John then Projectile flies into the air and lands in the front lawn; of which house not one cop searched. Great logic🥴.
(The complete absence of blood on that lawn is in the basement Brian tore out after the crime; then poured concrete over the basement floor.) @COURTTV
Guilty
Still can't get over why,noone came out of the house?!!!Which btw is being sold,log stock n barrel(including dog)was re-home!!!Also this is a long time:Fam home*Not forgetting(basement flr)remove
How come when the cops got there, if Karen knew who did it, why didn’t she say something? Why didn’t she say “the people in the house did this” something along those lines… she’s guilty
Why/How would she know who did it? Do you know who’s committing crimes right now? Oh,you don’t? GUILTY
@@notsorryyouretriggered damn, you care too much🤣
@@notsorryyouretriggered that’s a whole lot of people involved in this cover up, and no one speaks? It’s bullshit.
@@JustKatTalkingI care “too much” Nah you’re just stupid lol
@@notsorryyouretriggered you definitely care too much if you’re attacking all of my comments🤣🤣
Wait... didn't they say he didn't have a coat on?
He said he had proper attire for the weather...
He did not have a coat on, just a hoodie. This guy is wrong.
He's the only one who saw a puffed jacket... He didn't testify the same to Proctor and what he said on the stand. One version was that she was talking to someone else and now she's talking to him.
Go and see the cross examination with Katie McLaughlin. And we have a third version....
If he had on a big jacket.. How did he get the scratches on his arm?? The jacket sleeve would have been shredded.
He didn’t have a jacket on
@EricKeen-ff5mw That's what I meant..Did he have one when she dropped him off?? The whole thing is confusing. They kept saying at first he was lying in the driveway..but now it seems he was way across the front yard on the lawn..Things are not making sence.
How many first responders are going to be called to say the same things? Why isn’t the prosecutor calling the lead investigator to the stand? Prosecutors list of witnesses is something like 77. It’s going to be a long trial. Taxpayers dollars hard at work. 🙄
Everyone should have the right to a long and - if need be - exhaustive trial. A life was taken, and another's is at stake. Entertaining its public is about the last thing it needs.
@@EC-dz3fb if this is the best the CW has then they’re in big trouble. Most CW witnesses have started out cocky and were impeached easily. Yes, every accused person deserves a fair trial where the judge is fair and impartial. She’s playing judge and prosecution, objecting more than the real prosecutor.
This trial is a sham and Massachusetts deserves better.
@@Pug_Mom11 Fair enough, but none of that was in your first comment. That's what I was responding to.
@@EC-dz3fb fair enough. This UA-cam channel seems to be filled with people believing the garbage the CW is spewing. I didn’t think any critical thinkers would be here. I stand corrected.
@@Pug_Mom11 ♡
Did anyone in that house have injuries consistent with being in a physical fight?
You can be sure they're not going to just volunteer that information. .. the dog was giving away and the house has been sold since this incident.... play let's just keep saying nothing to see their.
The homeowner is a highly trained. MMA fighter ( and Bpd boxing team member). Sgt detective on fugitive team. And a highly trained first responder, did not come out of his house!! All facts !! Very tragic
No, neither did John, you should google what a face looks like that has been beaten.
No one ever did test that people that was in the house. And they never tested for John's DNA to see if he was in that house. Because the police said he got struck with her car when she droped him at the house, and he never went in then.
@@mauiswift6391 I was a young boy who was raised to be a man. And I know what beating up and getting beaten is!! In the ring and on the street!!! Kids these days can’t argue without shootings. And that’s cowardice
This witness seems to remember a whole lot of details after this much time has passed. Makes me wonder if he was told what to say on the stand.
I agree, atleast in terms of this guy remembering so many details, except of course the "big heavy coat" he was wearing lol lol though I can't say it's his memory that tips me off because I have an excellent memory lol lol too bad I don't think she did it so I still don't trust these witnesses 😂😂
Nobody familiar with the case trusts anything in the prosecution! Firefighter Kate ( driver who somehow took control of official report Instead of the squad leader Committed perjury saying over and over and over she is not friends with the Albert family She got caught!! The world is seeing all kinds of vacation pictures with the family
Seems the prosecutor is a fan of Rlaines questioning style “What if any?”
Why did Karen Read assume her boyfriend was in the snow on the front lawn? I would have thought she could have assumed that he was passed out on a sofa in the house. Her actions in my opinion is that she was really drunk when she hit him in rage, but drove home in a drunken stupor. Later, she probably sprung up out of bed with a bad feeling that she probably did something really really stupid! She probably was hoping it was just a bad dream. Unfortunately, when she arrived at the scene, reality hit her smack in the face! Her remorse was genuine, but people do stupid things when they are drunk.
Karens texts to John also show multiple lies. She texts the kids are home alone and shes in Mansfield along with vulgarities. Then later states she was at Johns...sooo Which was it?
Guilty, she's got that look about her.
You would be a fair and just juror.
🤣 I thought that too because of my ignorance; but I'm far more educated on this now and the corruption is horrible 😞
@@limasierra6639 🤣
@@limasierra6639😂😂😂 wait…wait 😅🤣😂😅🤣🤣
Your not the only one to say that... I'm still amazed every time. What do you look like? 🤡
No
Important view Reads interview with ABC she states she sees John walk to door. She later states she didnt say she hit him..she wondered if she did unknowingly. How could anyone possibly hit someone if they were at the door as she claims? As far as cuts on johns arm..if a dog attacked the clothing would certainly show destruction. What was found on Johns clothing? Possibly those injuries were there prior to this night?
What a BS Trial
It's becoming clear there is no cover-up. I can't believe people would even believe that anyway. Karen either accidentally hit John and it was not intentional, which is probably what happened. Or she's a downright murderer.. I don't think it was intentional. I'm glad all those "this is a cover-up, free Karen" comments are becoming rarer and rarer by the day. There's no cover-up. Let's try to figure out if it was intentional or not.
I think people are in denial if they don't think this is a cover up. Caitlin Albert googled how long it takes for a body to freeze in the cold, Albert's were never questioned, mr. Albert didn't even come out. The next week the dog was put down, the basement floor redone. Maybe people don't want to admit its cover up because it will be pandora box, a slew of other cover ups and corruption. Free karen read!
@@missmelissz See, this is what gets me. If someone's gonna say sh×t like this, at least get correct what 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 sides agree on and what's in the court documents: it was 𝗝𝗲𝗻 𝗠𝗰𝗖𝗮𝗯𝗲 who Googled "Hos long to die in cold." Not Caitlyn Albert. Not Karen Read. Not Rhianna. Not Buzz Lightyear. Not Jimmy Fallon.
💩 take
I have zero knowledge of this case before the trial started. But after week 1, my opinion today is that SOMETHING is being covered up. All of the stories up to now are so different. Especially the last fire fighter Katie. That testimony was all over the place.
This guy, the reason why all the microscopes and chemistry kits were sold out at Amazon
Dude, do you not own a mirror?! 😬
Why doesn’t KR go down to side bar trying to lean and listen to EVERYTHING so out of control in front of family grieving loss of JOK 😅
Her actions during the fiasco is clear indication of a guilt trip.Not even a mother of a dead baby will act like that.I am sure they will cry but they won't be running around like crazy people. Of course that with other things that she said and did like woking up panicking when there was no need to panick.
Totally, because every single person reacts exactly the same during a traumatic event. Also, you clearly aren't a parent to be making such an asinine comparison like that. I WOULD be acting like a total whack job if something happened to my child. Gtfo
You differently never went through a panic event in your life, or you just don't got a feeling for human. She was getting a panic attack, when she saw him.
He never mentioned before?
Yeah, as soon as he said big winter coat, I was like uhhh nooo.... he had a sweatshirt on. Lol but that came out that he maybe didn't remember correctly and didn't remove his clothes. I guess proper attire for me in that weather would be 3 pairs of pants, boots and a coat with multiple layers under it, my Son..shorts and a sweatshirt lol 😆
I thought he used the coat as an example of what they sometimes have to cut through, but I could be totally wrong!
When you are treating someone the last thing you remember is what they have on give the man a break he was trying to save a life
But the lieutenant said they only did CCR and nothing with the airway when they were on the scene.
𝗖reedence 𝗖learwater 𝗥evival?! Awesome! (😉)
@@EC-dz3fb
😂😂😂
@@charrielyn1231 I'm so glad 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 interested in this case still has a sense of humor. 😉♡
I think I am spending time watching this trial with EDB and not one of the first responders have the same story. Quit sensationalizing this case. 🤬
That’s a good thing… it would be suspicious if they all had the same story. This would be a whole ton of people in on some cover up.
@@JustKatTalking There's a ton ; already had Procter before a grand jury 😞
@@JustKatTalking Touche' I think 🤔
@@T-coon what do you mean
@@JustKatTalking I mean this case & LE & the Albert's reputation in that town & they're all connected with these other cops & the girl paramedic on the stand committed Perjury by the pictures she was shown & Proctor was called to answer already for his messing up this case to a Grand Jury. Better educate yourself on this one because it's horrible corruption 😞
She need to stop acting like a celebrity you are not jlo she did it guilty af
The judge needs to recuse herself
It’s been requested, and denied. She’s horrid.
She should be indicted. She's part of the cover up, with Lally her pawn, and Morissey.
Why would a recusal request be denied for conflict of interest? That alone is sus as f. More doubt.
@@pinwheel1212 I wasn’t even aware there had been a request until I heard Emily D Baker mention it on her livestream. My jaw dropped!😳 In my untrained mind in judicial protocol, there just seems to be the possibility of collusion or conflict of interest with so many local LEO involved. 🤷🏻♀️
Where there's smoke there's fire!!!
Who found him?
Karen.
Is it me or does the judge seem biased.?
It could be me..
Maybe something else is going on but why is she only allowing a few things to be published to the Jury & sustain other important questions not being allowed by the defense. 😮
hey court tv im watching todays trial but i cant comment. have i been blocked from your channel?
Presuming Karen Reed was framed- Did the bad actors assault and kill the victim unintentionally and then came up with a scenario so KR could be framed?
I think it was a fight, fell back hit his head, and of course, everyone freaked out.... can't have a dead cop in another cops house! So unintentionally, this is just my opinion. I believe they thought put him out and make it seem like the snow plow hit him. They didn't think it'd take sooo long for someone to see him, nor possibly consider that Karen would be up soooo early and be the one to find him. But once she did, the narrative changed... this is obviously a frame job. Everyone lying on the stand, and nothing in any reports until Proctor? That is fishy, the judge is just as bad(biased) and has tie with that family too! For her not to allow photos proving that paramedic Katie Mclaughlin, that lied over and over again about her friendship with the homeowners, daughter Caitlin makes no sense! And there are tons of photos with those 2 together arms interlocked, and they ran track together! Say you knew her, used to be friends or w/e, but to say I went to school with a Caitlin Albert and only an acquaintance. Why lie, unless you're hiding something...
how else would a framing occur?
Since all of the people in the chat were there, why doesn’t anyone come forward with the ‘truth’ so we can save taxpayers money??
@@susanwhalls6230
The truth is there.She is sitting in court.
@@shannonbrowne614
Give your script to the lawyer I'm sure he will be able to sell it to a director.I'm sure he has good connection in LA.
Free, Karen read 🙏🏻🩷🩷🩷🩷
That “McAlbert” money goes a looong way! The truth is slowly beginning to creep out … Enjoy! 🍿🥤
Absolutely not.. the reaction he is trying to paint is one of immediate shock. If she had hit him, it would have been hours before, and she would not be reacting like that. I believe he thinks he's speaking the truth but she did not say that
Nooooo. . She didn’t hit him.
Sorry but all the professional first responders heard her confess to thecrime
Do you have a photo of her when she's not looking over her shoulder?
Why Proctor had to see McLaughlin on 01.30, but he only saw the lead paramedic who had the report on 02.08 or 02.14? He knew McLaughlin was besties with Caitlyn Albert....
Yes.
"Yes" what?
@@mollykillarney2419 I answered the question.
@@Dragonpaws1 Oh! The title of the video! (Duh! Sorry - I was just so curious!)
That's ok👍
The judge doesn't want the truth to come out
"My Cousin Vinny". Cover up.
Huh? "My Cousin Vinny" wasn't a cover-up.
Some1 deliberately arranged 4John's fam 2b seated beside Karen's team!❤God bless her*
Don’t be gross. They believe Karen is responsible. It’s so the jury can see them.
Not true. Karen's team 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘦𝘥 for a smaller courtroom, and they got it. And its seating arrangement.
No she didn't,it was meant as a question,cuz she was hysterica
48:52 my cousin vinny
So very sad,he was doing so well all his medical stuff,except 4the puffy coat(wht a shame)!!!
Exactly looks like some1 or others placed him as far possible fr the hse?!!Soo where's the puffy jacket???SUS
Yeah don't judge a book by it's cover,so much description on the:Puffy(but in actual fact)no coat???Soo confused,really......
Thought Karen tried 2resusitate him,hence she was covered with:John's blood on face/hair!❤So why wasn't it mentioned,instead of fluffy coa
IT IS ….
Most prob not a vehicle injury;)!
Poor guy seems to shows how nervous he is just being on the stand. Must be daunting answering questions in court. Just not sure if this guys telling all the truth.
uhmmmmmmmmmmm
Wow some1 must've drowned those words in him,very strang
What does "drown those words in him" mean? (Just curious - never heard that phrase before!)
Amazing cover up IMO - hopefully the truth will prevail ❤️
For lack of better term,selected memory only:Judge luvs 2object only with:Defence???!!!!
Is it that difficult to tell if someone was hit by a car with the car present,, is this case for the purpose for viewers??? There's a missing piece to the puzzle 🧩🥶🤒🤔
𝗪𝗼𝘄. Riders are double and tripling down after Friday ...
From what I’m hearing people are dumping their koolaide down the drain 😂
It’s the beginning of the month, probably in line collecting their disability checks.