He is just the type of bloke that says complicated words to obscure a sentence and confuse the crowd giving him an edge across the uneducated society and statistically 80% of humanity is really stupid thus it's easy to fool such people when you lean on their own opinions.
I'm genuinely not trying to be mean but after watching this video (which came up in my feed for what reason I don't know, lol) I'd seek a test for autism. I know you probably didn't want to hear that or you may already know but you have made a 7 minute long video about one thing Peterson has said which in my opinion you have misinterpreted in the first place. Your choice but just trying to provide advice if I was in your situation. Have a good day regardless 🙂
Sorry, what is your social science degree in? Have you been a practicing clinical phycologist for decades and been a professor at multiple ivy League universities? I think you are unfamiliar whith the meaning of the term Idiot. It is the perfect description for a person saying almost everything you just said. Just my oppinion for what it is worth.
No the terms our idiocy. Just because people can act as Lexicographers, doesn't mean any new knowledge or understanding has been achieved. I think the broadening of descriptors has only served to muddy the waters. I do not think anything has been made any clearer except the fact that our society is totally obsessed with sexuality and self.
Pointing out that he has the numbers wrong doesnt count as a counter when you dont correct the numbers yourself though lol what percentage of ppl ARE pan?
I have to admit, that I was a bit confused too when he said this, but I've got two possible explanations for that. Firstly, it's not necessary to know a specific definition to know the statistics. So one possible explanation could be that he knew a statistic that represents this value without knowing the definition. Another possible explanation could be that he estimated the potion of pansexual people for rhetoric reasons. For sure an exaggeration like that would not be a fine way to go, but I think for showing up the scale this would be a sufficient approximation.
This video has attracted a lot of disagreeing comments, yours is one of the few that has any substance so congratulations on that. I get what you mean but I very much doubt that he had seen any statistics given his explained reasoning which is implied to be the source of the estimate. This reasoning had nothing to do with observed stats and everything to do with illogical speculation. Furthermore, it seems very strange to be familiar with stats on the likelihood of something while not knowing what the thing is, it is certainly possible, but extremely unlikely. I also have no idea how anyone would even collect stats on pansexuality in children, the complex social dynamics and norms surrounding sexuality mean collecting credible data on such things would be basically impossible. Most children probably have very little understanding of their sexuality, I know that I certainly had virtually no understanding of such things. I also dislike the idea of someone expecting kids to identify with a sexuality label, that seems very weird to me. Your rhetorical explanation is better I think, and is at least somewhat true. There is a thin line between rhetorical hyperbole and blatant misinformation, not to mention that his stated reasoning and confidence leads me to believe that he thinks his estimation is of decent accuracy as opposed to some kind of hypothetical. Jordan Peterson speaks with a degree of confidence and certainly which discredits the idea that this was an unsure hypothetical. Thanks for the thoughtful and considered comment.
@@bigjim199 I don't see why it would be important to know the data on pansexuality in children. Sexuality is innate, so it would be the same share of people in adults and children. Do you have statistics on pansexuality?
I don't feel safe. This video makes me feel uncomfortable. 1) The speech is very insulting and name-calling (like "he is an idiot") towards an individual. 2) The speech is combined with a despicable ugly cartoon of the individual. He combines hateful speech with hateful images. 3) I fear other people will start hating him and attacking him, because they are inspired by this hateful video.
Step 1: REPORT > Harassment or bullying > This is harassing someone else Fill in: According to the 'Hate Speech policy' of the UA-cam Community Guidelines, the following is not allowed on UA-cam: Content promoting hatred against individuals based on any of the following attributes: Gender Identity and Expression. Also, this video has combined hateful speech with hateful imagery. Namely, a very despicable ugly cartoon of Dr. Peterson as a thumbnail, indicating aggression and bullying towards this individual. Your content violates the 'Hate Speech Policy' of the UA-cam Community Guidelines. Therefore, UA-cam will remove the content and send you an email to let you know. If this is your first time violating our Community Guidelines, you’ll likely get a warning with no penalty to your channel. If it’s not, we may issue a strike against your channel. If you get 3 strikes within 90 days, your channel will be terminated. Examples Here are examples of hate speech not allowed on UA-cam. - “[Person with attributes noted above] are dogs” or “[person with attributes noted above] are like animals.” - “[Person with attributes noted above] are idiots” or “[person with attributes noted above] are like idiots.” - Repeatedly showing pictures of someone and then making statements like “Look at this creature’s teeth, they’re so disgusting!”, with similar commentary targeting intrinsic attributes throughout the video. Conclusion Looking at the UA-cam given examples we have concluded, this is exactly what you have been doing. Also, you have used a very despicable ugly cartoon of Dr. Peterson, indicating you are aggression towards this individual. Therefore, you leave us no other choice than reporting this video for Violation of "Hateful or Abusive content" and "Harassment or Bullying". We have therefore reported this video for both. I don't feel safe. Your videos scare me.
He is just the type of bloke that says complicated words to obscure a sentence and confuse the crowd giving him an edge across the uneducated society and statistically 80% of humanity is really stupid thus it's easy to fool such people when you lean on their own opinions.
I'm genuinely not trying to be mean but after watching this video (which came up in my feed for what reason I don't know, lol) I'd seek a test for autism. I know you probably didn't want to hear that or you may already know but you have made a 7 minute long video about one thing Peterson has said which in my opinion you have misinterpreted in the first place. Your choice but just trying to provide advice if I was in your situation. Have a good day regardless 🙂
My exact thoughts ;-P
Yeah, Jordan Peterson is a very smart man and knows exactly what hes talking about.
Unlike the idiot that made this video.
thank you for saving me 7 min.
So why do you want to take a test to see if you're autistic?
Sorry, what is your social science degree in?
Have you been a practicing clinical phycologist for decades and been a professor at multiple ivy League universities?
I think you are unfamiliar whith the meaning of the term Idiot. It is the perfect description for a person saying almost everything you just said.
Just my oppinion for what it is worth.
I think Peterson is dangerous
Yeah dangerously stupid
No the terms our idiocy. Just because people can act as Lexicographers, doesn't mean any new knowledge or understanding has been achieved. I think the broadening of descriptors has only served to muddy the waters. I do not think anything has been made any clearer except the fact that our society is totally obsessed with sexuality and self.
Pointing out that he has the numbers wrong doesnt count as a counter when you dont correct the numbers yourself though lol what percentage of ppl ARE pan?
I have to admit, that I was a bit confused too when he said this, but I've got two possible explanations for that. Firstly, it's not necessary to know a specific definition to know the statistics. So one possible explanation could be that he knew a statistic that represents this value without knowing the definition. Another possible explanation could be that he estimated the potion of pansexual people for rhetoric reasons. For sure an exaggeration like that would not be a fine way to go, but I think for showing up the scale this would be a sufficient approximation.
This video has attracted a lot of disagreeing comments, yours is one of the few that has any substance so congratulations on that.
I get what you mean but I very much doubt that he had seen any statistics given his explained reasoning which is implied to be the source of the estimate. This reasoning had nothing to do with observed stats and everything to do with illogical speculation. Furthermore, it seems very strange to be familiar with stats on the likelihood of something while not knowing what the thing is, it is certainly possible, but extremely unlikely. I also have no idea how anyone would even collect stats on pansexuality in children, the complex social dynamics and norms surrounding sexuality mean collecting credible data on such things would be basically impossible. Most children probably have very little understanding of their sexuality, I know that I certainly had virtually no understanding of such things. I also dislike the idea of someone expecting kids to identify with a sexuality label, that seems very weird to me.
Your rhetorical explanation is better I think, and is at least somewhat true. There is a thin line between rhetorical hyperbole and blatant misinformation, not to mention that his stated reasoning and confidence leads me to believe that he thinks his estimation is of decent accuracy as opposed to some kind of hypothetical. Jordan Peterson speaks with a degree of confidence and certainly which discredits the idea that this was an unsure hypothetical.
Thanks for the thoughtful and considered comment.
@@bigjim199 I don't see why it would be important to know the data on pansexuality in children. Sexuality is innate, so it would be the same share of people in adults and children. Do you have statistics on pansexuality?
I don't feel safe. This video makes me feel uncomfortable.
1) The speech is very insulting and name-calling (like "he is an idiot") towards an individual.
2) The speech is combined with a despicable ugly cartoon of the individual. He combines hateful speech with hateful images.
3) I fear other people will start hating him and attacking him, because they are inspired by this hateful video.
WTF ..... .........
Step 1: REPORT > Harassment or bullying > This is harassing someone else
Fill in: According to the 'Hate Speech policy' of the UA-cam Community Guidelines, the following is not allowed on UA-cam: Content promoting hatred against individuals based on any of the following attributes: Gender Identity and Expression. Also, this video has combined hateful speech with hateful imagery. Namely, a very despicable ugly cartoon of Dr. Peterson as a thumbnail, indicating aggression and bullying towards this individual.
Your content violates the 'Hate Speech Policy' of the UA-cam Community Guidelines.
Therefore, UA-cam will remove the content and send you an email to let you know. If this is your first time violating our Community Guidelines, you’ll likely get a warning with no penalty to your channel. If it’s not, we may issue a strike against your channel. If you get 3 strikes within 90 days, your channel will be terminated.
Examples
Here are examples of hate speech not allowed on UA-cam.
- “[Person with attributes noted above] are dogs” or “[person with attributes noted above] are like animals.”
- “[Person with attributes noted above] are idiots” or “[person with attributes noted above] are like idiots.”
- Repeatedly showing pictures of someone and then making statements like “Look at this creature’s teeth, they’re so disgusting!”, with similar commentary targeting intrinsic attributes throughout the video.
Conclusion
Looking at the UA-cam given examples we have concluded, this is exactly what you have been doing.
Also, you have used a very despicable ugly cartoon of Dr. Peterson, indicating you are aggression towards this individual.
Therefore, you leave us no other choice than reporting this video for Violation of "Hateful or Abusive content" and "Harassment or Bullying".
We have therefore reported this video for both. I don't feel safe. Your videos scare me.
I've just watched the Peterson video, i understand what he's saying. I haven't a clue what you're rambling on about though.
Awful video. God bless Jordan Peterson.