How North Korea is Preparing for War

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 619

  • @business
    @business  3 місяці тому +10

    Get unlimited access to Bloomberg.com for $1.99/month for the first 3 months: www.bloomberg.com/subscriptions?in_source=UA-camOriginals

  • @barrel1885
    @barrel1885 3 місяці тому +269

    Iraq and Libya no Nukes: 💀
    North Korea with Nukes: 😎

    • @void9837
      @void9837 3 місяці тому +2

      These government officials don't have a back round in healthcare, economic work experience to understand trucking, agriculture or how to operate a successful business. They are not trained properly. They only get a tour of the building and introductions to people.

    • @Troyxxt
      @Troyxxt 3 місяці тому +45

      True that proves NK point why nations should have nukes and who is usa to decide which nation can or can not have.

    • @hans-dieterjung4026
      @hans-dieterjung4026 3 місяці тому +7

      short and right

    • @hans-dieterjung4026
      @hans-dieterjung4026 3 місяці тому +6

      @@Troyxxt 👍👍👍👍

    • @seoul_9584
      @seoul_9584 3 місяці тому

      And Ukraine was invaded by Russia. Because Ukraine neutralized their nuclear weapons

  • @kreativechaos7606
    @kreativechaos7606 3 місяці тому +298

    Even Kim knows, Pointy is Scary, round not scary. 😂

    • @corebabajustin1238
      @corebabajustin1238 3 місяці тому +5

      No itches?

    • @lkb9527
      @lkb9527 3 місяці тому +14

      alladeen man, alladeen

    • @potterj09
      @potterj09 3 місяці тому

      Then he and his Augustus Gloop daughter need to stop being so round. 👍

    • @x-file-0
      @x-file-0 3 місяці тому

      US PROPAGANDA😂😂🐒🐒

    • @daydaybrown741
      @daydaybrown741 3 місяці тому +1

      Just ask nuclear Nadal

  • @TonyW-z9w
    @TonyW-z9w 3 місяці тому +20

    Because they learned from the mistake of not having it like Iraq and Libya.

  • @SiggiTh
    @SiggiTh 3 місяці тому +304

    Kim is smart enough to make the nukes pointy. :)
    Pointy = Scary

    • @adamheuer8502
      @adamheuer8502 3 місяці тому +12

      Yes if it isn’t point it won’t get stuck in the ground and then explode

    • @MionMikan
      @MionMikan 3 місяці тому +6

      Oy Vey!

    • @Latinkon
      @Latinkon 3 місяці тому +11

      "The Dictator", one of the funniest films I've seen.

    • @DadyTomorrow-qi9bo
      @DadyTomorrow-qi9bo 3 місяці тому

      Hh

    • @ryanlee2091
      @ryanlee2091 3 місяці тому

      Every joke about Kim Jong Un or North Korea is more scary.
      This type of joke has been historical evidence that the government has a plan for conscription against North Korea.
      They won't make jokes like this if the conscription size is small...

  • @charaznable1131
    @charaznable1131 3 місяці тому +91

    Remember when gaddafi gave his nukes away

    • @ooc4436
      @ooc4436 3 місяці тому

      They gave USA/NATO the complete lists of where things were stored, from A to Z, everything was handed over, as soon as they were sure not a single missile was left, they began bombibg Libya.

    • @sanchezjoel
      @sanchezjoel 3 місяці тому

      Also remember when Ukraine surrendered her Nuclear weapons to Russia and now Russia is invading Ukraine.

    • @brinjoness3386
      @brinjoness3386 3 місяці тому +1

      Same for Ukraine

  • @LokiTheGodofMischief
    @LokiTheGodofMischief 3 місяці тому +184

    What did Kim say about the US invading countries without nukes?

    • @milan988
      @milan988 3 місяці тому +9

      kim jong is such a mennace US govt is scared asf

    • @notavailable-24
      @notavailable-24 3 місяці тому

      The United States does not invade countries with nukes

    • @notavailable-24
      @notavailable-24 3 місяці тому

      The United States does not invade countries with nukes

  • @alispeed5095
    @alispeed5095 3 місяці тому +207

    Well if they didnt have nukes. They would be like Gadaffi. Nukes are the only reason they are not yet invaded :)
    Its the hard truth.

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 3 місяці тому +18

      No they wouldn't, because they weren't. North Korea always had the security of being under Soviet Russian and Chinese protection. It is for instance why even at their nadir in the 1990s, even in widespread famine and instability, NK still had China keeping everyone else at bay.

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 3 місяці тому +8

      ❤exactly AS SIMPLE as THAT.

    • @av_oid
      @av_oid 3 місяці тому

      An invasion of North Korea would still not be possible because of support from China (see: Korean War).

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 3 місяці тому +26

      ​@@serebii666You just said no and went on to say Yes by your reasoning, are you slow or what 😂

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 3 місяці тому +2

      @@BruceJ999 No, but you might be. Look up the Korean War and see why Noeth Korea's existance was always secure. Its purpose is to be a buffer state, unlike Libya.

  • @Troyxxt
    @Troyxxt 3 місяці тому +93

    I don't see it as world problem I see it as US problem

    • @ronaldmessina4229
      @ronaldmessina4229 3 місяці тому +8

      @troyxxt J’ai suis complement d’accord avec vous 😮😮

    • @petrihadtosignupforthis8158
      @petrihadtosignupforthis8158 3 місяці тому

      Japan, Korea and... World problem.
      Say, China makes NK sabotage Taiwanese TSMC. We all get done, as our whole world plus your phone runs on their tech.

    • @elpenprice679
      @elpenprice679 3 місяці тому +1

      try harder lol

    • @branko917
      @branko917 2 місяці тому +2

      US have a problem with anyone who do not want to pay racket.

  • @UsernameR8
    @UsernameR8 3 місяці тому +186

    Countries invaded by north Korea=0,
    Countries invaded by the US= many

    • @nashpv
      @nashpv 3 місяці тому +16

      Isn't they invaded South Korea and got beaten by US

    • @raheemharris6035
      @raheemharris6035 3 місяці тому +59

      @@nashpv that is a civil war they where the same country thats like saying the usa invaded the usa south in civil war

    • @WorldlyBudget
      @WorldlyBudget 3 місяці тому

      @@nashpv and the US was beaten back by China and North Korea.

    • @wayando
      @wayando 3 місяці тому

      ​@@nashpv... South Korea and North Korea are technically one country ... With an ongoing Civil War.
      Just like Taiwan is part of China ... The guys in Taiwan were the losers of the Civil War.

    • @tempejkl
      @tempejkl 3 місяці тому +9

      ⁠@@nashpvThat was a civil war. Also it ended in a stalemate between the DPRK + PRC and ROK + United Nations

  • @Seawitch907
    @Seawitch907 2 місяці тому +7

    Kim and Putin have become besties 🤯

  • @javdahmardah
    @javdahmardah 3 місяці тому +22

    You got to love the person or a nation who can defend against any aggression

    • @x-file-0
      @x-file-0 3 місяці тому

      HE IS PROTECTING HIS COUNTRY

    • @elpenprice679
      @elpenprice679 3 місяці тому

      yep, like when US/SK defended against NK aggression

    • @하이-m5m3s
      @하이-m5m3s 2 місяці тому

      김정은의 목적은 북한을 방어하는게 아니라 자신의 정권을 방어하는것이다

  • @andy68686
    @andy68686 3 місяці тому +65

    Foreign countries bombed by the US: 29
    Foreign countries bombed by the NK: 0

    • @GyawaliPrajwal-uk1zh
      @GyawaliPrajwal-uk1zh 3 місяці тому +3

      USA Only 29😂

    • @elpenprice679
      @elpenprice679 3 місяці тому +1

      add the part where NK invaded SK

    • @briangasser973
      @briangasser973 3 місяці тому +1

      I noticed you didn't included places where NK directly ships it's weapons to be used

  • @malav_patel
    @malav_patel 3 місяці тому +56

    North Korea would never use them or it would also mean their own end too (they know it). It's strong posturing and deterrence tho.

    • @bluthgold533
      @bluthgold533 3 місяці тому +29

      Yep, countries with nukes don’t get invaded. That’s the main reason why he wants nukes

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 3 місяці тому +14

      And who will end NK?Certainly not the the West unless they want to be erased from History too😂😂

    • @malav_patel
      @malav_patel 3 місяці тому +6

      @@BruceJ999read what I said lol. Plus You think NK would survive if it nuked a western or American city?? 😂 NK would be erased from the map long before it even got started lol

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 3 місяці тому +15

      @@malav_patel And China,Russia would sit and do nothing,Right?Right?😆😂You blind or what

    • @xyz11zxc11
      @xyz11zxc11 3 місяці тому +4

      It's called mutually assured destruction for a reason..

  • @wf645
    @wf645 3 місяці тому +37

    Funny when N Korea has less than 1% of USA's 5000 nuke warhead ...

    • @ooc4436
      @ooc4436 3 місяці тому

      Most of those US nuclear warheads are locked on targets in Russia and China.

    • @martinturner5766
      @martinturner5766 2 місяці тому

      Bity silly. How u know that

    • @Abdurhmano0o
      @Abdurhmano0o 4 дні тому

      The difference is the leader there is kim

  • @saiforos7928
    @saiforos7928 3 місяці тому +47

    If any other country did what the USA did in north Korea it'd be considered a genocide. With unit 732 members too.

    • @adamheuer8502
      @adamheuer8502 3 місяці тому +2

      What did they do?

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 3 місяці тому +6

      What exactly did The US do in North Korea? And are you unaware that unit 732 was part of Imperial Japan, that was the US's enemy too?

  • @davep7176
    @davep7176 3 місяці тому +49

    "Where the average person earns less than £3 per day..." proceeds to show a clip of a busy street with all those people looking healthy and wearing nice clean clothes.... Show us an average scene in a city morning in UK and you will see more poverty

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому +6

      Much less homelessness over there too, housing is seen as more of a right.

    • @barnabydehoedt
      @barnabydehoedt 3 місяці тому +6

      @@Red_Lion2000 yeah if housing, healthcare, food and electricity are heavily subsidised then $3 a day might not be so bad

    • @davep7176
      @davep7176 3 місяці тому +4

      @@Red_Lion2000 As it bloody should be. Everyone who works should be able to afford to buy a house within 5-10 years of salary and all workers should automatically qualify for mortgages (not like in this s---hole I live in)

    • @davep7176
      @davep7176 3 місяці тому

      @@Red_Lion2000 I went on Google Earth and browsed around their country. It doesn't look anything as bad as people say. There are seaside towns, industrial cities etc etc. From what we hear they are either living in Pyongyang or they live in a mud hut or badger hole in the ground.... It's all lies I never believe anything the mainstream news/media tell me, in fact I believe the opposite is true most of the time.

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому +3

      @@davep7176 I agree mate.

  • @bobby4500
    @bobby4500 3 місяці тому +24

    best insurance coverage against western "democrazy"

    • @void9837
      @void9837 3 місяці тому

      These government officials don't have a back round in healthcare, economic work experience to understand trucking, agriculture or how to operate a successful business. They are not trained properly. They only get a tour of the building and introductions to people. Obamas were lawyers, Biden a lawyer.

  • @avus-kw2f213
    @avus-kw2f213 3 місяці тому +69

    North Korea isn’t as poor as people say it is

    • @bladee123-u8e
      @bladee123-u8e 3 місяці тому +19

      source: trust me bro

    • @princenkrumah5647
      @princenkrumah5647 3 місяці тому +14

      Facts. Comparing some African countries their cities are far better

    • @joeallen7781
      @joeallen7781 3 місяці тому

      The west aren't able to spy on Bureau 39 so they make assumptions, DPRK have an enormous trading partner right across the Yalu river making it almost impossible to be poor, and China loves them there (so does the EU that have no qualms with importing their cheap labor goods that you buy at Zara, target etc).

    • @jovanleon7
      @jovanleon7 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@princenkrumah5647 ah that must be why the whole country is dark at night and only the capital city is bright. 😂

    • @JohnKobaRuddy
      @JohnKobaRuddy 3 місяці тому +2

      My mate went about 8 years ago and he said it was fine. Very clean.

  • @Gogopak_69
    @Gogopak_69 3 місяці тому +22

    So much pain in western media channels eyes 👀 😂

  • @peter_de_Jong817
    @peter_de_Jong817 3 місяці тому +25

    But why do you think they are of the opinion to need them? If the US regime wasn't so warmongering the world would be a much better place.

    • @elpenprice679
      @elpenprice679 3 місяці тому +1

      warmongering NK? when they invaded SK? hmm

  • @Mancada100
    @Mancada100 3 місяці тому +15

    017: "Pointy is scary, round is not scary"

    • @x-file-0
      @x-file-0 3 місяці тому

      AMERICAN PROPAGANDA

    • @thor-q7s
      @thor-q7s 3 місяці тому

      @@x-file-0 Its from a movie

  • @1Bhishu
    @1Bhishu 3 місяці тому +7

    It's logical that sanctioned countries where gonna come together to fight for their survival.

  • @mathiarasu1970
    @mathiarasu1970 3 місяці тому +15

    You’re saying it’s poor country. But the building there looks like Dubai.

    • @thor-q7s
      @thor-q7s 3 місяці тому +5

      Thats only what they want you to see, Tourists have guides and you are allowed to look only where they want you to look, tho most of the country is poor and people dont eat well enough

    • @ooc4436
      @ooc4436 3 місяці тому +1

      In the USA there is an obesity epidemic because people are eating junk food because that is what they can afford. Increasing numbers of medicare related debt and bankruptcies because people are unable to make payments on their bills. The USA is not that better off either.

    • @thor-q7s
      @thor-q7s 3 місяці тому +4

      @@ooc4436 The usa is much better, Most people who eat junk food are because of laziness or addiction, However in the north korea you dont even have the choice to eat the junk food, Neither do you have the option to turn your lights on at night, So tell me, Is north korea still rich in your mind?

    • @ooc4436
      @ooc4436 3 місяці тому +1

      Have you tried buying healthy, organic grass fed millk, meat, eggs, or real bread? The corporations own and run the USA. North Koreans at least know who is really in charge. North Korea's enemies are not a source to learn about North Korea.

    • @briangasser973
      @briangasser973 3 місяці тому

      ​@@ooc4436Good luck living on $3 a day in NK. The US has its issues, but I don't see migrants flooding the NK border to live there.

  • @wedihayet9702
    @wedihayet9702 3 місяці тому +16

    The west blackmails North Korea as the “poorest country” but North Korea seams to be a nice developed country.

    • @bossnandi
      @bossnandi 3 місяці тому

      backward you mean!

    • @SPICEMAN-473
      @SPICEMAN-473 3 місяці тому

      MONEY IS NOT RICHES I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY THEY KEEP SAYING THEY ARE POOR …THEY HAVE THE BASICS TO SURVIVE

    • @truthinyourface7345
      @truthinyourface7345 3 місяці тому

      North korea is cleaner than India

    • @하이-m5m3s
      @하이-m5m3s 2 місяці тому

      선진국이 되려고 노력하는 국가가 국민들을 노예처럼 부려먹냐? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

  • @patrickco2398
    @patrickco2398 3 місяці тому +87

    north korea wouldnt be poor if there were no sanctions.

    • @st.altair4936
      @st.altair4936 3 місяці тому +15

      Same with Cuba. These countries are essentially biding their time for when these sanctions will stop being effective.

    • @adamheuer8502
      @adamheuer8502 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes just like the Soviet Union it will be the richest country for 10,000 years

    • @adamheuer8502
      @adamheuer8502 3 місяці тому

      @@st.altair4936 There are no sanctions on Cuba the government is just run by idiots

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 3 місяці тому

      Yes they would be. Case in Point: the former Eastern bloc. North Korea just like them restricts the movement of people an goods due to the risk of destabilizing the regime. The result is widespread poverty and obsolescence, which is the cost they are willing to pay to insulate the Kim regime in power.

    • @serebii666
      @serebii666 3 місяці тому +4

      @@st.altair4936 Sanctions didn't make these countries poor, their awful and unsustainable economic policy does. Just like the former Eastern bloc and China before it readopted no-holds barred capitalism. Just think about it, if sanctions really was keeping them poor, then that would still mean that to be wealthy they would need to rely on the capitalist system, trade and policies of the nations that don't have their awful economic policies.

  • @dropyourself
    @dropyourself 3 місяці тому +23

    Do one on the US.

  • @Mancada100
    @Mancada100 3 місяці тому +25

    NK Military: "How pointy you want our missiles be?"
    Kim Jong Un: Yeeeeeessssssssssssssssss!

  • @ruffgook
    @ruffgook 3 місяці тому +4

    they left out crucial information where north korea got substantial funding from south korea for the purpose of normalizing relations and investments in the late 90s. those funds however was largely used for nuclear weapon development.

  • @musiconabudget3712
    @musiconabudget3712 3 місяці тому +5

    America is the country that is expanding its nuclear weapons the most . Why is that not scary but this is lol

  • @level1selamat155
    @level1selamat155 3 місяці тому +8

    Commendable to Mr Kim Jong Ill... refuse to be bullied by any power

    • @ChristyBermingham
      @ChristyBermingham 3 місяці тому

      But no one gives a s T about him when was the last time you said oh how is rocket man doing 😮

  • @davidfognini8526
    @davidfognini8526 3 місяці тому +7

    there's more homeless people in the USA than in north korea and more ball..s than the USA ❤

  • @variabletalisman2754
    @variabletalisman2754 3 місяці тому +40

    Rocket man needs to chill man damn 😂

  • @_Devil
    @_Devil 3 місяці тому +3

    the short answer is that there was a weak President in charge of America.

  • @ooc4436
    @ooc4436 3 місяці тому +2

    The North Koreans have at least 400 or so nuclear warheads.

  • @AlexandarIvanov-uz2sl
    @AlexandarIvanov-uz2sl 3 місяці тому +3

    Let's agree to disagree

  • @dualexistence
    @dualexistence 3 місяці тому +3

    NK doesn't even have electricity but it has nukes! Don't be so gullible, guys!

    • @Wubwub772
      @Wubwub772 3 місяці тому +1

      its pretty easy to hire scientist and engineers when you don't have to feed your people...

    • @하이-m5m3s
      @하이-m5m3s 2 місяці тому

      전기는 있어. 핵무기에 전부 쏟는거지

  • @Violincase
    @Violincase 3 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for employing a human narrator.

  • @minus3dbintheteens60
    @minus3dbintheteens60 3 місяці тому +5

    Some pretty big, convenient holes in this timeline

  • @abbasriza8206
    @abbasriza8206 3 місяці тому +1

    All these talk makes me 😂. In 1945 USA decided not to make Korea Independent after Japanese occupation for years. The Koreans were not given a chance to govern. America provoked the Korean war, but lost. The largest American military base outside mainland America is in South Korea. Just like Afghanistan, if US withdraw, North Korea will unite Korea. This is the reason why USA is so bitter.

  • @shamramphul479
    @shamramphul479 3 місяці тому +4

    Salute to the North korean leader ,Mr 👏🙌 KIM JUN UN ❤. Thks.

  • @shadowslayer9988
    @shadowslayer9988 3 місяці тому +14

    North Korea also has chemical weapons and bio weapons (with different viruses and pathogens).

    • @Donthaveacowbra
      @Donthaveacowbra 3 місяці тому

      Er bio weapons maybe. They're generally regarded as utter insanity to use as any sufficiently viable one would spell doom to their own country

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому +5

      Like the ones USA used on Vietnam?

    • @shadowslayer9988
      @shadowslayer9988 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Red_Lion2000 Yep

    • @TonyW-z9w
      @TonyW-z9w 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@Red_Lion2000And used on the Korean.

    • @KatyYoder-cq1kc
      @KatyYoder-cq1kc 3 місяці тому +1

      CORRECT

  • @sandeepsrinivas7
    @sandeepsrinivas7 3 місяці тому +6

    You missed a huge fact. Islamic Military Dictatorship Pakistan had helped North Korea by selling nuclear blue prints.

  • @antonjunior9189
    @antonjunior9189 3 місяці тому +3

    it's Red Dawn, guys

  • @into_the_void
    @into_the_void 3 місяці тому +16

    Short version: with the help of china ans pakistan

  • @westrim
    @westrim 3 місяці тому +6

    Formidable? Have they even actually been able to get them down to rocket sized, let alone functioning fusion bombs instead of fission?

    • @Plekenull
      @Plekenull 3 місяці тому

      For Its economic size

    • @tempejkl
      @tempejkl 3 місяці тому

      Do they need to be big? Still are a deterrent

    • @TheResilient5689
      @TheResilient5689 3 місяці тому

      Even fission bombs would still be terrible on their own, if launched and detonated near quite frankly any population centers, military bases, etc., at all.

    • @westrim
      @westrim 3 місяці тому

      @@TheResilient5689 "Have they even actually been able to get them down to rocket sized"

    • @TheResilient5689
      @TheResilient5689 3 місяці тому

      @@westrim they’ve had ICBMs for years now, so I guess the answer’s yes.

  • @chairmanlmao4482
    @chairmanlmao4482 3 місяці тому +1

    Leave it to the U.S. (the only country to have ever used nuclear weapons against another country, and against a civilian population no less) to fearmonger over North Korea's nuclear weapon stockpile

  • @josejotafernandez9913
    @josejotafernandez9913 3 місяці тому +2

    If you consider this arsenal alarming, US' arsenal is about 500 times more alarming, and it's the only country in history who used this arsenal (against civil population)

  • @shamramphul479
    @shamramphul479 3 місяці тому +2

    Salute to Mr Vladimir Putin and Mr KIM JUN UN 👏. Thks.

  • @batangMarkado-nx8nb
    @batangMarkado-nx8nb 3 місяці тому +6

    Are you sure that North Korea is poorest country?

  • @Speed1-t2s
    @Speed1-t2s 3 місяці тому +1

    He is scared Kim can’t do nothing

  • @sire_99
    @sire_99 3 місяці тому +2

    Pakistan helped North Korea a lot in nuclear technology yeah I know NK's nuclear weapons are based on Plutonium and Pakistan's nuclear weapons are based on Uranium but Pakistani officials admitted that they have given them the technology of Nuclear weapons to the NK

    • @lucientjinasjoe1578
      @lucientjinasjoe1578 3 місяці тому +1

      Pakistan is an U.S. ally for countering india or did you forgotten the gulf of Bengal crisis and that the Soviet helped India

  • @AndreSidjeTalom
    @AndreSidjeTalom 3 місяці тому +2

    hard to be believe North Korea is poor. it's not true.

    • @jennagarcia9411
      @jennagarcia9411 3 місяці тому

      This is exactly why NK is poor lol. The regime prioritizes funds to its military rather than to aiding its people.

  • @Senior2442
    @Senior2442 10 днів тому +2

    Sprecht ihr auch vom Südkoreanischen Atomwaffenprogramm der USA?!

  • @truth895
    @truth895 3 місяці тому +2

    According to US .. Russia is fighting with showells😅😅

    • @Deltasquadformingup
      @Deltasquadformingup 3 місяці тому

      What? This has nothing to do about Russia

    • @elpenprice679
      @elpenprice679 3 місяці тому

      actually its shovels and bows, last time I checked they're on bikes and golf carts since they're running out of IFVs lol

  • @AAA_Rickroller
    @AAA_Rickroller 3 місяці тому

    Yet, The ICBMs are lighter than Kim jong un

  • @Serosmorux
    @Serosmorux 3 місяці тому +4

    get a mirror US!!

  • @level1selamat155
    @level1selamat155 3 місяці тому +3

    Slanderous, nothing but slandering

  • @hctan659
    @hctan659 3 місяці тому +6

    If every country keeps escalating conflicts. Global conflict one day is inevitable

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому

      USA are the only ones doing that.

  • @morbid751
    @morbid751 3 місяці тому

    That country still exists because it has nukes. And we all know that

  • @bill-ct9rj
    @bill-ct9rj 3 місяці тому +2

    WELL WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO HAPPEN WHEN YOU CORNER A DOG!!! THE DOG IS GOING TO FIGHT BACK!!! THIS IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED HERE!!!! LET THE NUKES FLY!!!!!

  • @francisseguna3004
    @francisseguna3004 2 місяці тому +1

    Yes.

  • @bhakti.exchange
    @bhakti.exchange 3 місяці тому +23

    I learnt nothing from this - no evidence

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 3 місяці тому +1

      ❤exactly.

    • @Eoin-B
      @Eoin-B 3 місяці тому +4

      Read the article in the description. It contains dozens of references. All are underlined and linked.
      Your making it seem like this print media company is just some blogger.
      I'm probably talking to a bot though.

    • @snoopysnoops007
      @snoopysnoops007 3 місяці тому

      @@Eoin-B Go through the actual links, it's all articles that self refer to one another. There is one mention of a washington based pro-US think tank whose own articles are again self-referential. This is not evidence. This isn't even a strrong narrative. Just pure clickbait prop at this stage.

    • @anmolt3840051
      @anmolt3840051 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Eoin-B article is paywalled

    • @j.k.1239
      @j.k.1239 3 місяці тому +2

      It's usual propaganda.

  • @jittertn
    @jittertn 3 місяці тому +2

    However small developement it achieved
    It can safe guard
    Against marauding allies intending to reset it back to the stone age

  • @Pesso317
    @Pesso317 3 місяці тому

    He’s trying to claim he’s hard by destroying the whole world because he’s afraid of one army

  • @kamranmediacenter
    @kamranmediacenter 3 місяці тому +1

    What about US long range missiles and nukes
    Why you people are not demanding US to get rid of there nukes and missiles

    • @Abdurhmano0o
      @Abdurhmano0o 4 дні тому

      They Own the media rare to blame them unfortunately they're the greatest evil in world

  • @guybeingaguy
    @guybeingaguy 3 місяці тому +1

    Having the technology is far different than the capability to do it.
    The warhead is HEAVY! Getting it up in the atmosphere takes some energy and they eat bark.
    IF you get it into the atmosphere you have to fly it really fast over an ocean undetected.
    IF you get it that far, THEN you have THE MOST difficult part.
    Re entry. They are not even CLOSE to this step yet. They are still eating bark.

    • @jyc313
      @jyc313 3 місяці тому

      They don't care. It's about perception, and while the tech may not be as advanced as other major nuclear powers, they have advanced enough where the world cannot simply bully N Korea about. That was the aim in the end.
      BTW - the people that make policy over in N Korea, and the class of people that make up the govt, military, and its ancillary ecosystem don't eat bark. The poor do, and we all know they don't actually care about the greater population.

    • @fuzer4047
      @fuzer4047 2 місяці тому

      People should realize that US has satellites that are made to detect ICBM, ballistic missile launches around the globe

  • @dnguyen787
    @dnguyen787 3 місяці тому +1

    I don't think North Korea can build any nuclear bombs. China has let them borrow it! LOL

    • @nothembajozi2862
      @nothembajozi2862 3 місяці тому +1

      Now you respect China. USA Arrogance and ignorance never ceases to amaze me.

    • @dnguyen787
      @dnguyen787 3 місяці тому +1

      @@nothembajozi2862 I didn't say respecting China, did I?? LOL

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 3 місяці тому

      different designs... so you are wrong. and it would make no sense since China couldn't control the nukes.

  • @twigbone3200
    @twigbone3200 3 місяці тому +5

    so if usa do it its freedom but nk does it its alarming????????

  • @Globalinsiderofficial
    @Globalinsiderofficial 22 дні тому

    Its funny how you can spend billions in defense only to have a cold war era army

  • @st.altair4936
    @st.altair4936 3 місяці тому +27

    Incredibly impressive that they managed to do this under these brutal sanctions. The sanctions should gradually lose effect over time as the US loses influence and Global South countries gain influence.
    If the socialist Libyan government had done the same as the DPRK and not given up their nuclear program to improve relations with the west, they would not be in ruins right now...

    • @st.altair4936
      @st.altair4936 3 місяці тому +13

      Let's hope Iran learns from history and continues to develop their own nuclear deterrence. Specially with what's happening in Palestine.

    • @PwningGerZ
      @PwningGerZ 3 місяці тому

      Lol, what? China is helping them. China just doesn’t want the responsibility of taking care of them getting conquered destabilizing their own geopolitical ambitions.

    • @alispeed5095
      @alispeed5095 3 місяці тому +5

      100%

    • @alispeed5095
      @alispeed5095 3 місяці тому +1

      @@st.altair4936 More like lets hope they have the time. They seem to be on the radar yet they currently have no nukes.

    • @petergreen5337
      @petergreen5337 3 місяці тому +1

      ❤Precisely well said and well OBSERVED. You speak TRUTH and wisdom.

  • @mohammadshaown892
    @mohammadshaown892 3 місяці тому +16

    If North Korea is so poor, so uneducated according to WEST than how they have WMD production & High technology? & if they are barbaric/rough nation then why they didn't invaded a single Island forget a country?

    • @Donthaveacowbra
      @Donthaveacowbra 3 місяці тому

      That isn't overly intelligible... The answer is they only barely managed to make missiles capable of reaching mainland usa. They have access to computers millions of times more powerful than engineers and scientists in the 60s and only barely made what they made then with regards to rockets. The nuclear aspect, again, they're not even at the 1960s level as we aren't entirely sure if they have been able to produce thermonuclear devices but we are sure they're attempting to. Without that their devices are significantly lower and yield and higher in fallout. Again, something Russia and the USA managed in 1955 with slide rules.
      The sheer reality is essentially every developed nation could probably make an icbm and nuclear weapon if they had a nuclear reactor. Fewer could build a thermonuclear bomb, though probably still more than you'd think. North Korea is indeed a backwater and shouldn't be. They're at the whims of a military regime that will stay in power due to their nuclear weapons. Opening up their economy would spell death to the Kim's which is why they're more restrictive than ever before

    • @mohammadshaown892
      @mohammadshaown892 3 місяці тому +6

      @@Donthaveacowbra Why your getting triggered? They have right to develop any tech let alone WMD tech. Moreover they have a history of not invading a single Island in this "Multinational Modern Global South".

    • @ysp1784
      @ysp1784 3 місяці тому

      Because that’s what they spend all their money on, they have little left over to develop with

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@DonthaveacowbraLOL,even you don't believe the nonsense you wrote 😂

    • @pickymapping6098
      @pickymapping6098 3 місяці тому

      @@mohammadshaown892 USSR and Pakistan gave North Korea the tech and knowledge to build nukes.

  • @adstix
    @adstix 3 місяці тому +12

    South Korea: Samsung, LG, Kia, Hyundai, etc
    North Korea: Nukes, nukes and more nukes cheered on by a choreographed population!

    • @j.k.1239
      @j.k.1239 3 місяці тому +6

      Also South Korea: High suicide and plummeting birth rates.

    • @Cpxxxx1
      @Cpxxxx1 3 місяці тому +4

      also South Korea: I dont have sovereignty at all, just look at my Constitution!

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому

      US: has even more Nukes and has used them twice on civillian populations.

    • @pickymapping6098
      @pickymapping6098 3 місяці тому

      @@j.k.1239 Also North Korea: People starving to death or killed in "Gulags"

    • @Abdurhmano0o
      @Abdurhmano0o 4 дні тому

      Samsung is useless in mid fight

  • @DesertVox
    @DesertVox 3 місяці тому +7

    Comments are being CENSORED left and right.

  • @narillio1928
    @narillio1928 3 місяці тому +2

    North korea: around 50 nukes
    Russia and US: more than 1000 nukes each
    France and china: around 200
    Yeah north korea is definitly the one to worry about 😂

  • @rishikeshkharat
    @rishikeshkharat 3 місяці тому

    They didn't build it rather joined NSG first, got the tech used it to make nukes and then withdrew from the group.

  • @albertosurumay4193
    @albertosurumay4193 2 місяці тому

    I hope the civilized countries will be able to stop the craziness before things goes wrong

  • @musicmikeish
    @musicmikeish 3 місяці тому +3

    Poor country my foot. Those people don't look poor.

    • @Wubwub772
      @Wubwub772 3 місяці тому

      maybe they're just better dressed then you?

  • @Troyxxt
    @Troyxxt 3 місяці тому +6

    Then let them build has much has they want.What is the problem

  • @DesserieKgaises
    @DesserieKgaises 3 місяці тому +4

    Who told you North korea is poor? It's the country nobody knows anything about.

  • @petergreen5337
    @petergreen5337 3 місяці тому +14

    😂 This article is just speculation and HEARSAY.
    Where is the EVIDENCE supporting your claims?
    Where are the starving people?
    Where is the drug trafficking EVIDENCE? .

    • @Eoin-B
      @Eoin-B 3 місяці тому +7

      Read the article in the description. It contains dozens of references. All are underlined and linked.
      Your making it seem like this print media company is just some blogger.
      I'm probably talking to a bot though.

    • @snoopysnoops007
      @snoopysnoops007 3 місяці тому

      @@Eoin-B wow you post a LOT, you may not be a bot but you do seem like a US bot-like NPC.
      Again. Go through the actual links, it's all articles that self refer to one another. There is one mention of a washington based pro-US think tank whose own articles are again self-referential. This is not evidence. This isn't even a strrong narrative. Just pure clickbait prop at this stage.

    • @anmolt3840051
      @anmolt3840051 3 місяці тому +2

      @@Eoin-B article is paywalled

  • @laflame9591
    @laflame9591 3 місяці тому +14

    Spoiler: He does that by letting his people starve to death

    • @DadyTomorrow-qi9bo
      @DadyTomorrow-qi9bo 3 місяці тому

      H

    • @anmolt3840051
      @anmolt3840051 3 місяці тому +5

      And yet North Korea population seems to be growing, unlike South Korea's population

    • @Jesus_was_God
      @Jesus_was_God 3 місяці тому +1

      no one starves in north korea, it would be a blasphemy in the peoples eyes to see a starving population under kim, they are well dressed and cultivated a friendly atmosphere in their society, everyone has a job and food. You westerners talk of starving as if the whole world is hungry... chinese eat as much meat they want and in africa they throw bread away in tons, food is always abundandly available, unless there is war (iraq, gaza, libya, afghanistan!)

    • @Red_Lion2000
      @Red_Lion2000 3 місяці тому +1

      sounds like propaganda garbage to me mate, Go North Korea!

  • @tonejunkeee
    @tonejunkeee 3 місяці тому +3

    Time to send in Rodman for a round of 'horse' and sense-talkin'

  • @Owenfam44
    @Owenfam44 3 місяці тому +14

    Goodluck to North Korea

  • @kirkuk2076
    @kirkuk2076 3 місяці тому

    So what country spends more on military operations around the planet, Ireland? Brazil? the UK, the EU? Russia? China? no this countries military bill is more than all of those put together, wonder who that is

  • @reynaldosantos8692
    @reynaldosantos8692 3 місяці тому

    I subcribe.watching from GUAM.USA❤

  • @Zagirus
    @Zagirus 3 місяці тому +2

    Our planet isn't some whimsical, harmonious utopia where everyone gathers around a campfire, holding hands, singing kumbaya, and living in blissful unity. No, it's a brutal, cutthroat battleground where only the fittest and most cunning survive. Believing in some utopian fantasy of everlasting peace is not just naive, it's catastrophic.
    North Koreans understand that in a world teeming with countless nations, each vying for supremacy, there is no room for complacency or misguided idealism. It’s a world dominated by the principle of "conquer or be conquered". There is no cozy middle ground where diplomacy alone can guarantee security and prosperity. If you're not prepared to rise to the occasion, to assert your dominance, and to defend what is yours, you'll find yourself quickly overrun by those who are less naive and far more ruthless.
    This is the unforgiving reality of our planet, a reality we must confront head-on without any sugar-coated illusions. They understand that power and strength are the only currencies that truly matter. In this vast expanse, those who cling to whimsical notions of universal peace and brotherhood are doomed to be trampled by the relentless march of those who know better. So, let's dispense with the fantasies and face the stark truth: survival demands strength, strategy, and an unwavering will to prevail.

    • @Jesus_was_God
      @Jesus_was_God 3 місяці тому

      u waste ppls time, ehh keep it short .

  • @Rajeshammm
    @Rajeshammm 3 місяці тому +1

    Nehru once said, world should not go to nuclear haves and have not, when powerful nuclear natuon don't give heed to other nation secuity there will be a situation when some politician will convince the nation to build there own nuclear weapon,

  • @screenplay8100
    @screenplay8100 3 місяці тому

    strange that they did'nt mentioned AQ Khan for giving info about how to enrich the plutonium to DPRK

  • @kramer1916
    @kramer1916 3 місяці тому

    And they dont even work

  • @Petch85
    @Petch85 3 місяці тому +1

    I bet Ukraine regret handing over there Nuclear weapons.
    They were promised that they would get help if anyone started a war with them.
    But that help was the minimum possible and did not arrive timely.
    The more Nuclear weapons we have the higher the risk of some of them detonating. 🤞

  • @henryhunter1876
    @henryhunter1876 3 місяці тому

    $25 billion? Nonsense Zimbabwe is $180 billion according to imf. Go figure.

  • @sleepymeow7156
    @sleepymeow7156 3 місяці тому +1

    When Bloomberg says a country can attack the US homeland loudly in public, usually that country has not yet been able to, but when Bloomberg says a country can not, that’s when someone in the US is worried.

  • @trymoremafuchadhliwayo9304
    @trymoremafuchadhliwayo9304 3 місяці тому

    with these nukes i dont agree the country is as poor as the west think

  • @naturalis2535
    @naturalis2535 3 місяці тому

    since when does north korea play football?

  • @potterj09
    @potterj09 3 місяці тому

    Russia will probably use NK as a provocateur and then a shield. lol At least they didn't waste money on modernizing Pyongyang.

  • @madden8021
    @madden8021 3 місяці тому

    They're now getting Russian Help which is a very big concern

  • @fransjebik8554
    @fransjebik8554 3 місяці тому

    Countries which are surroounded by usa, nato and allies will devellop weapons too fight back. If they are not surrounded by usa, nato and allies, there is no need of those things.

  • @DesserieKgaises
    @DesserieKgaises 3 місяці тому

    Dont bother by them. He is trying his best to defend itself from usa

  • @jrey5523
    @jrey5523 3 місяці тому +2

    Is that or being destroy by USA