Safety Third Mike Rowe Dirty Jobs
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 жов 2018
- Looking at the platitude or cliché of SAFETY FIRST, from the perspective of getting the work done. Looking at SAFETY from the perspective of the people at the sharp edge, not the people at the blunt end in the boardrooms
Many years ago a whitewater rafting guide said, “Safety Second.” You don’t raft if you want to be safe.
This is the most legit safety philosophy out there.
The most safe thing in the world is doing nothing, so yeah, there's more important things than safety
Would you eat at a restaurant with this motto? Or fly on an airplane with this ideology? Didn't think so dipshit
the most safest thing in the world when doing nothing is not an option is preplanning. To look at your work area and fixing what is broken.
@@clevelandbrown5709 You missed the point dipshit.
If safety (risk elimination) is always first then you would be doing nothing.
The OP said "there's more important things than safety".
Everything carries a certain amount of risk, flying, eating out or walking down the street all have an element of danger, you must sacrifice levels of safety to do anything.
Even doing nothing can be dangerous. What if a tree falls on your house? You did nothing. Star trek quote. If you can't take a bloody nose, go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here.
@@joseas1518 youd check the tree and make sure it is stable enough to not fall on your house.
I am a young guy trying to start my furniture business in my parents barn. I don't have money for the fancy safer machines.
lol my job sent me here...and I like it
A lot of people have jobs that that are inherently dangerous. In the militarily they do stuff that is dangerous but the mission still has to be done. Part of mission planning is a risk assessment where you identify the risks try to take steps to mitigate the the risk and continue with the mission.
Except the military often, even generally, embraces the Safety First mantra and has bureaucratized it into every day actions, from mandatory wearing of fluorescent PT belts, to risk assessments for all missions, to the motto, Be Safe. It's everywhere and is in direct competition with lethality and mission accomplishment, which in reality have become secondary considerations.
@@thomassenbart Truth! Worse, the Pournelle's Bureaucracy types in the military enforce stupid things in the name of safety that makes Soldiers _less_ safe. A prime example is rodding weapons on ranges. Stupid, useless, damages weapons, encourages poor habits, while making things less safe - but we keep doing because of "safety."
Safety Third! It's a much better approach.
I love osha to a degree. companies need to be told to keep workers safe sometimes because they have been willing to feed you into the machine before. I also have been a technician long enough for to know that bosses telling you to be safe and wear ppe is useless they have to wear it. I keep me alive, I wear PPE and a gas detector because I like not being dead.
I love it. I would like it if you took on truck driving. The government has overrode trucking with safety. FMCSA is out of control pulling drivers over at will, on the road and at chicken coups, for no reason. They have constant road checks for any reason they can come up with. It is a serious infringement to freedom of movement, momentum, productivity and it's unsettling to be stopped for no reason. I worked what might be called dangerous jobs. I know, without talking about it, I need to be careful. We know when selecting our job the hazards of the job. We learn with the people we work with.
theres a reason they do that, because of high amounts of accidents on the road, drunk or high truck drivers or drivers who have their brakes worn so bad that they cannot stop. You don't have freedom of movement you follow your gps.
@@stephen7690 Are you a truck driver or Owner?I guess you didn't read what I wrote carfully. Nor did you listen to Mike Rowe. Safety 3rd. This Nation was built on hard men doning hard jobs.
@@stephen7690 tell us, what are high amounts of accidents? Give us some statistics! How do they happen? Whose involved? Why's there so many trucks?
@@stephen7690….hey pal, National statistics say that in roughly 80% of accidents between a car and a truck, the car is at fault. You never hear that but it’s true.
@@MS-oz2wudoning
Rowe2024!!!
LMAO, he talked to the boss and the boss tells him he doesn't care about the safety of his workers. That's why safety regulations exist. So that your boss doesn't get you or others killed in their pursuit of every drop of profit they can possibly squeeze out of you. The free market can't police itself. Safety regulations exist for a reason, a damn good reason.
You kinda missed the point my friend. If you rely on OSHA and regulations to keep you safe, that's how accidents happen. If an oil spill occurs, or a person dies, and the company gets to say "Well we followed all the regulations", nobody get's punished. Assume everyone thinks safety is third, so you take steps to look after your own safety instead of assuming everyone thinks safety is first.
I have no doubt that skipper would do his best to keep everyone alive but he can’t control your stupidity from upstairs.
He doesn't really say anything in this clip. That said, bosses also put safety third. Think about it.