I’m a 3D animation student. So far, my 5900X, 3080ti 12Gig, and 128 gigs of ram served me well. With that being said, I haven’t had any super heavy projects and if I do, we have MONSTER PCs at school that I have access to if I ever need them. I would to upgrade to the latest and greatest but I don’t have that kind of money right now.
Finally someone approached the 3D workflow the right way! Congrats! That's why you are the best creator's channel! Just to add some information, if your workflow consists in modelling in Blender and rendering in Unreal with Lumen, you can go pretty far with an i5, 64 gb of RAM and an AMD or Intel ARC GPU with 16gb. The 4060 16gb makes a ton of sense here, too.
@BaieDesBaies my experience with CAD and engineering software in general is that it is usually less intensive on hardware than other 3D applications. Also, they are poorly optimized and don't explore multi-threading very well, for example. So, an i9 won't be that much faster than an i5 90% of the time. If you use things like Inventor, AutoCAD, or Revit, you can do a lot of stuff with basically anything. I would only recommend max the ram and buy nvidia for compatibility issues. Even a rtx 2060 12gb will do a lot. But, if you are going to use for finite element simulations, this can get pretty nasty, pretty fast. You can do stress analysis on Inventor for reasonably complex geometry with almost any PC. If you are going for fluid dynamics, most probably you'll need a threadripper. From all this, the best advice is to find a way to estimate how much ram you'll need and build from there. Then, buy a Nvidia gpu with the most VRAM you can. In engineering applications, capacity is king, not raw speed. Finally, Puget systems have some good benchmarks on their site.
@@OficinadoArdito Thanks a lot for your extensive answer. I'm very far from these price ranges. I have my personnal desktop with 14600K, RTX 3080 and 16 Go DDR4 but I still need a laptop with tiny budget. Do you think new cranked up integrated graphics like Arc in Core Ultra H or Radeon 680M are good enough for 3D CAD ? What about a 6 Go laptop 3050 ? I won't push into the hardest tasks for the moment cause I am still an engineering student.
Using Resolve with UHD timelines with stabilization, color grading, noise reduction and voice isolation I seldom see much over 16GB of RAM use. My system has 32GB and outside of complex Fusion constructs, it rarely uses more than about 60 percent of that.
Do you have the memory usage slider set to max on resolve? This is an adjustable parameter in resolve mines set to 12gb, and it's not enough, although I'm editing on a potato lol
One of the most important things for video creators is big and fast hard drive. The fastest CPU and GPU can't compensate slow hard drive or bad configuration of multiple hard drives.
Lightroom AI noise reduction pin my RTX4080 to the max. I run all my wedding church and dancing shots through AI noise reduction. Takes about 4sec per image and if you have to do 300 images time add up. Also smart masking like select sky or teeth whitening works so fast. On my old PC I was constantly waiting for task to be completed. I agree 64GB ddr5 RAM is a sweet spot for photography. Lightroom, Photoshop, Spotify and Plex server running in the background can take upto 40GB easily.
I'm curious about the denoise and bokeh features that lightroom released recently. Seems like there's not a lot of info regarding all these AI features that Adobe has released in the last year and how it affects PC performance. I have an older 2070 super and anytime I apply the new AI denoise to an image I have to walk away from my pc because it throttles my GPU.
@nathanielmartin6631 Yes Denoise hits GPU hard. They updated bokeh but didn't try it yet. First bokeh implementation was not good I believe it's still in the beta stage.
@@TomasRamoskaindeed. I'm hoping to upgrade my graphics card once the next Gen cards get released and get a deal on this generations cards, but I'm not sure what benchmarks I need to be looking to make a good decision. Videos like this are like your CPU is more important, which may have been true in the past but graphics cards are now a lot more important since these new features have been released.
I’m currently stuck with a 1080 ti that I got like 7 years ago, it’s super slow on Lightroom. I’m looking at purchasing a rx 7900 rtx 24 gb since it’s cheaper than a 4080 or a 4090. Would that still be good for Lightroom?
@asher791 7900xtx should work extremely well. I run all my wedding images throughout the enhance - denoise at 50% default value. (I used to run just church and dance images but now run everything, feature smart enough to leave low ISO files with minimum effect) Speed depends on file size if you shoot 24mpx raw files should take about 3-4sec per image. I recommend running Denoise after you finish your edit. Just before you are ready to take files into Photoshop. Adobe did amazing work. ISO6400 looks like ISO100 with all sharpness preserved.
This why you're currently one of my favorite PC tech channel! Keep it up, love to know more about content creation PC stuff. Oh btw as a commercial photographer myself - 32GB is plenty sufficient. 16GB minimum. Of course I guess it depends on what the person photographs, if it's many 45MP RAW files and doing editing then yeah maybe. In the end it's what the person is doing but 32GB is plenty sufficient really and most people will get it all done with 16GB. Ditto to the video part too, at least I feel that way. Video editing for example, many software doesn't use GPU for work. Davinci Resolve for example doesn't enable GPU acceleration unless you're using Studio version. So for fast video work generally it's CPU first ahead of everything else. GPU is handy, I tried using GTX 1050 for my 4K video work recently and it was sluggish - personally I'd recommend 3060 12GB being a good one. I'm using 8GB VRAM GPU but some work does hit a limit with 8GB, not for me but for some people I know.
for 3d, Corona renderer and Vray are CPU-based but Vray can use GPU or even both but the best results can be otten from rendering with CPU. GPU is crazy fast but the results do not look as good as CPU.
But to be honest a wonderful video none the less Thank you so much for making this video it was one of my requests in the old comments and glad that it’s been noticed by you Keep them coming love them all. Like I am one the first few who views the video as it’s released 😅
I wish you talked a little about thermal control,using water-cooled or air cooled. Not sure if this is true or false: I've always bought bigger cases with good air throughput because with a bigger case there is a larger volume of space to radiate heat. Although if I had a case with 3 push in fans in the front, 3 fans on top pulling out and 2 fans at the rear. Using the same fans, the smaller box would have a higher density of air and would cool better than a larger box. Do you place your cases on the floor or on the desk? I also wish you would compare data cable and other cable quality.A scape on the lowest sata cable or a break break at the connector went on fire and destroyed almost every component. Besides that, shorter cables are faster if they have the correct end connectors. How about doing a video on NAS drives and which ones are better for creators.. thanks
A larger case is easier to get decent airflow through than a smaller case. But at the same time you are not incorrect in that it takes longer to exchange the total air volume in a larger case if the same number and type of fans are used. But it is harder to get the airflow optimal in that smaller case. So either way it's a trade off. It might be worth considering using even more fans in a larger case, that way you can have them set to a lower fan speed and still get even faster air exchange in the case. This can result in lower sound pressure. Another question is water cooling or not, and if so is it worth going for a open loop or using a AIO (All In One, a closed loop that is installed as is). The open loop is more expensive, more modular, more efficient and more dangerous as any mistakes can make them more likely to leak. Really good air coolers are actually pretty close to the performance of simpler open loops or AIO coolers. But a open loop can be designed to use several radiators and can be used to cool not only the CPU but also any GPU in the system. Now being a boring unimaginative guy I'd say go for a large case and air cooling, or possibly a quality AIO. This makes the system easy to work on, reliable and somewhat cost effective. But like I said I'm a boring old cuss. I want a big case with out a single window of glass panel. I don't need to look at my computer, I need it to do it's job and the less I see of it the better. You may have very different priorities, so consider that when reading this. Being a "Function over Form" guy I think that if you go open loop then definitely go with a soft line system. Hardline cooling loops look good, but can be a pain to work with should you ever have to swap parts. As for AIO I'm partial for the Arctic Cooling products, especially those without RGB. I told you I'm boring! The Arctic AIOs are not sexy and a bit bulkier than most others, but they have excellent cooling and comes in versions without RGB... 😁 Oh, and they are among the cheaper coolers even though they out performs almost all comparable AIO coolers no matter the price.
Thanks so much sir! You've been so helpful over the years...and I've built 2 machines based off of the things I've learned from this channel. Still the ONLY creator focused tech/PC channel out there! Now...a controversial request. Agree with it or not...Ai is quickly becoming very much a part of the creative workflow. I'm a vfx artist...and one of the ways we try to remain ethical with using ai is to train our own ai models for visuals (watch corridor crews videos on how they did their second ai anime short). But anyways yes...more and more creators, like it or not, will be forced into a similar workflow. So, wondering if you would consider looking into hardware/workflow suggestions for that (growing) niche of creators. 🤔
I filled up my 3dgb RAM & 150GB disk cache while editing in Photoshop and is now considering to upgrade to the 13th generation Intel processor due to its DDR4 support.
Hi, can you please do a premiere pro video comparing 8gb 16gb 32gb 64gb 96gb and 128gb and if it makes a difference in any parts, rendering, editing, timeline etc. Please also do 2 channel vs 4 channel, that would be very much appreciated. I run 2x32gb in my editing rig at the moment for my main channel (not this), so your videos help me a lot.
Some tips for those who want to start in 3D animation from an amateur 3D animator: 1- Having more VRAM on your GPU doesn't necessarily mean faster rendering. 2- Always optimize your scene; it doesn't matter if you have a 4090. An optimized scene will make things easier for both your GPU and you. 3- In a 3D environment, the CPU is mainly for hair and fluid simulations, while the GPU is for rendering (which takes much more time). So, you'll be okay with a mid-tier CPU if you have a high-end GPU. 4- 32GB of RAM is really good for a 3D animation PC These are some tips that I've learned as an amateur/hobby 3D animator.
Your videos are great and were very helpful building my latest PC, my main use is for audio (recording studio), I just wish you had more videos about that subject or other channels who talk about performance in the same detail you so.
I know the video is a bit older… Fast storage / size and the right ports (Type C, Thunderbolt…) are way more important for a photo editing workflow. Get the right motherboard with all the ports you need. You can still upgrade the CPU and GPU in the future for cheap on the used market… My workstation is a bit older now (going on for 4 years now) and the only thing I upgraded was to more storage to dump memory card onto… A fast card reader on Type C or TB is key if you need to speed up your workflow and not spend time on waiting,,,
this IS the channel for all content creators. Keep them coming. Always look forward to your content. I always thought AMD would be better. Since seeing your video, I would have to say Intel and Nvidia is still the way to go. Many thanks
Speaking about your 3 cameras, how are you changing cameras while recording? Are they all recording and you edit the footage? Or are you changing cameras remotely?
I might remember this time of my carrer later in the future as a youtube creator, started now by just shooting 2.5K footage on a very old obsolete gopro hero 4 black, lol, and editing it on a vivo v9 small lcd screen using a free app, exporting it to 4k. Now you can view 4k of my shorts or almost a minute cover. Haha. Who knows, if everything become goods, we can upgrade, and it might be a massive jump. 😂 Thanks to Tech Notice channel! 😊 You can see it in my guitar cover videos. Thank you guys!
Definitely intrigued by the 96gb per ram stick you mentioned! Just searched Newegg and don't see any of the like. Looking to upgrade my video editing pc with 5950x, rtx 3090, and 64gb (4x16) CL14 3600 MHz ram soon next year once the next gen processors start releasing. Might even look into Xeon or Threadripper if they come out with new ones (and prices are humane). As my video projects have gotten more dynamic, and performance has not been up to par with my expectations. An 850w PSU is what came with my 4090. Not sure if perhaps I should have gotten a larger capacity. My Project files drive (Firecuda 530 4tb) and OS drive (Firecuda 530 2tb) are good to stay. Cache drive should be good enough to stay, not sure (Samsung 960Evo 500gb). Also hoping Fractal Design come out with an updated Torrent case model that has more cable management space, hard drive storage space, and cmore compatible with AIO's. Seems to be the only case supporting large 180mm fans.
You mentioned to never get the KF of a CPU because it lacks a iGPU, but what are your thoughts on KS? Also, does a specific RAM CL make a difference? Thanks!
The Core i9 13900KS is just a slightly higher clocked and hotter running version of the Core i9 13900K. In all other things it's the same. So it is just as good or bad for whatever you are doing as the K version. Well it might be a little faster, but you also have to make sure you have the cooling to keep it from heat throttling. And yes, it is running a lot hotter than the K version. So hot that you might actually get worse performance unless you really beef up the cooling. Puget Systems has looked at the Core i9 13900KS and compared it to the K version and AMD R9-7950X. The Intel CPU's smoked the R9 in just about everything they threw at them, but the KS was only marginally faster than the K version of the Core i9 processor in most cases. For details Google: puget systems "Intel Core i9 13900KS Content Creation Review" They have benched Photoshop, Lightroom, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve and more.
-KS CPUs are just slightly boosted chips from the get-go, aka "silicon lottery winners" (6GHz for the 13900KS vs 5.8GHz for the 13900K), at a ~$200 "markup" depending on who you ask. It does come with an iGPU so Quick Sync is available, but you gotta ask yourself if the 200MHz clock boost is worth the almost $200 price increase, not including the cost required to keep that chip under decent temps, without having to let it thermal throttle. As for the memory latency question, I'm not super expert in that regard, but from what I know, yes but "it depends". CL timing, along with its transfer rate, help determine how long it takes for the memory to read a stored word (how quick it can react to an action), or "first word latency", so for example, a DDR4 3200MT/s CL16 kit is "equivalent" to a DDR4 3600MT/s CL18 kit, both with a first word latency of 10 nanoseconds (ns). This is calculated by multiplying the CAS timing by 2000, and the result is divided by the transfer rate. With some tighter (lower) CAS timings and higher frequencies, the memory could run slightly quicker, at the possible cost of stability. Following the previous example, now if we compare the previous two against a 3200 CL14 kit or 3600 CL16, the latter would be faster with a first word latency of ~8.7-8.8ns. Extra manual tuning, memory binning, and system stability, are all factors to consider as well. If you want the best performance you could try overclocking and manually tuning your RAM, or if you want to make sure stability is your top priority, especially with current DDR5, you could either run the kit at their XMP/EXPO values or at the motherboard's default config without enabling XMP/EXPO.
I would like to see your handling of a Xeon build that is well balance for photo and video but the best for 3D, which of the many Xeons would you pick and the other components and your reasoning process to decide just to have something dedicated to the Intel people.
Question about Gen5 NVME (T700). What I know is, that a benchmark like puget Bench for DR, will run faster when the testfiles are placed on a Gen4 than when they are placed on a Gen3 NVME drive, most others have no bottleneck, so they have the same speed. I know that only this view Filetipes should be even faster on a Gen5 NVME. Now what I don't know is, if it brings a bigger benefit when the OS and the DR installations would be on a GEN5 drive, or if it is better to have there let's say 8K-RAW data, let's say for the benchmark the Puget Bench files. I am thinking to get a T700, but I still struggle with the desition.
OS dosen't really matter if its on gen 5 or even a sata drive beyond boot up time which may take a couple extra seconds. Better to save your gen 5 for the big files you need.
would love to see you use 2 amd gpu together, now the question is can a 7000 series gpu work with a 6000 series gpu and share each other when placed in a system.
Thanks for all these great videos! They've actually inspired me to build my own PC not too long ago. But I've run into some issues with Lightroom even with a 13900k. I have a 4070Ti and it seems that the 12GB VRAM tends to be the bottleneck for CR2 and CR3 images for me. This is especially noticeable when opening a dual monitor setup and trying to zoom in at 100% on the second monitor while at the same time having the photo open on the first monitor. The image just doesn't load and shows up as black, or sometimes only loads partially at a lower resolution, at the same time bringing LR to a complete halt. Has anyone else experienced this issue as well? It just seems crazy to me that having 2 photos open would slow it down that much.
@@theTechNoticeYeah, I’ve even got the Intel Driver & Support Assistant as well as the NVIDIA software (on the creator version of the drivers) to check any new updates.
So I’m torn. I had a 13900k but swapped to a 7950x3d because of stability issues. Now I see some weird system stutter with ryzen. I have 2 days left to return my product. I kinda wanna go back to intel because when it worked it was amazing.
Bear in mind that current RAM chips are 16 GBit or the newer 24 GBit, so 32GB or the newer 48GB individual sticks are double sided and thus put the equivalent load of 2 single sided sticks on the IMC. These WILL struggle to hit their XMP speeds! I 'downgraded' from 64GB 6400 to 48GB 8000MTs to use the newer 24GB single sided sticks.
Ok .editing a single photo is one thing (single core) I do macro focused stacked full frame (12 to 42 mp) 35mm Typically stackin up to 250 frames I need horsepower this is oct 24 Cpu/gpu Suggestins please 🙏
I'm going to use a 3900X / 2070 Super (or 2080Ti) system with 32GB of RAM to teach myself DaVinci Resolve. I don't own an AM5 system but might go that way when Zen 5 releases. Meantime, I'll be using the AM4 I already have. Thoughts?
It should be something that won't make the system work slower than intended, like a motherboard with poor power delivery paired with a power-hungry CPU. Some people will try to go for the cheapest thing that'll do the job without being WAY too cheap construction-wise, like no heatsinks on the MOSFETs/chokes, subpar power delivery compared to other slightly more expensive models, no SSD heatsinks, poor audio codec, and the list goes on. Others will go for whatever fits their needs without breaking the bank - a decent amount of rear I/O ports, certain internal connectivity like front-panel high-speed USB-C, extra m.2 slots, all within a specific price range. And there's the other group that gets the most expensive stuff for "reasons", but if it's something you want/need and it fits your requirements, go ham ($1.2K MSI MEG Z790 Godlike, anyone?). The way I go for choosing a motherboard is taking the middle-of-the-road approach, looking for something that will fit my needs without breaking the bank. I tend to look at power delivery (9-12 phases), m.2 slots (2 is more than enough for most people, but 3 slots can be useful), rear USB slots (at least 6 USB type A, at least one USB-C), MAYBE some wireless connectivity, or the option to install a 2230 Wi-Fi card (i.e.: some ASRock motherboards come with a "dedicated" 2230 m.2 E-key slot for a Wi-Fi + BT card), MAYBE a front-panel USB-C header, sufficient 4-pin PWM + 3-pin ARGB headers, and a $200 cap.
when it comes to motherboards you really just need to know what features you want, most high end motherboards are just bloated with useless features, I would say the most important thing is the chipset (ie z690, z790, x670, b550m etc). I would say 150$ for a motherboard is a good spot to start. This guy used the Asus ProArt a lot, and the benefit to it is the sound card built in, it's a lot better than most motherboards.
@@Prabhu_njd It's more than capable. If anything, maybe try to stick to two RAM sticks to avoid any potential instability issues with DDR5 (if using XMP). Gotta make sure the cooling solution can keep up with the heat output.
Has the whole 4 sticks of RAM thing been settled? I'm building a new creator PC. ProArt Z790 Creator motherboard, 13th Gen i9 with a RTX 4090. I'd like to do 128 GB of DDR5 RAM. I'd like to go with Corsair Dominator but they only offer 64 GB (2x32) kits. Asus only lists Kingston Fury Beast RAM as compatible (4x32 GB) kit to get 128 GB. What do you recommend? I prefer the Corsair kits better.
@@Born_Stellar I was thinking the same thing. Buy two of the Corsair 64GB kits. If I have any trouble running 4 sticks, I’ll just remove two of the. Just run on one 64GB kit. I can’t seem to get a straight answer from Asus or Corsair when I contacted them. Perhaps Intel 14900k will offer better RAM support and motherboard choices.
Yes you and I are on the same page with this. I too can't seem to get a straight answer on this 4 sticks of RAM issue. I want 128GB of RAM because I'm a video editor with heavy After Effects animations. I'm looking at 14900k just like you. Let's update this thread as we get answers, help each other out. Cheers!
Often people migrate some of their components to the newer build. Does it make sense to move over older SSDs including M.2 drives? Also I have an Invidia 1070 gpu. Should bring that over as well?
just built a pc for photo editing. amd 5600x with 32gb ddr4 3200mhz ram i have a rx 580 8gb gpu and i need to upgrade it but don't know what to buy for budget with matching performance with cpu
If your target RAM is 32 GB for example...is there any benefit/detriment to having ONE 32gb card installed, as opposed to TWO 16gb cards (aside from obviously having to discard them if you want to upgrade)? Performance wise, any difference?
In my current build I have a Ryzen 9 5900X, ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC graphics card, Asus ROG Strix B550-E Motherboard. I just bought a ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC graphic card. Should I upgrade to a Ryzen 9 7950x 6-core, 32-thread and ASUS ROG Strix B650E-E Motherboard? Thanks
hi, can you please suggest for GPU processor 13500 MB asus B660 ddr4 Ram 3200mhz 32gb air cooler PSU Corsair VS600 80 Plus GPU currently using K2200 from my previous build, want to upgrade for DaVinci (for max 4K & 15 mins videos for YT) & Solidworks with moderate use, is 4060 8gb ok ?? and Zotac 2fan for 3+2 y warranty or gigabyte for 3 fans (both are bit similar at pricing in India
Hi Thank you that is really helpfull, Can you make a video for AI art generation with Stable Diffusion SDXL, They suggest minimum 8GB vram and Nvidia Graphics card, What would be your suggestion for a budget PC Configuration. I belive you are the right guy to give some suggestion, Thank you
I am running a B450 Steel Legend, Ryzen 7 5700X, 32gb ram, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. And I feel I get a bottleneck. I am thinking of upgrade to Ryzen 9 7950x, and RTX3060. how much improvement would I see?? I don't see a coffee buy???
My system has a Ryzen 5 5600G and 16GB or RAM and no discrete GPU. I am able to edit 4K video just fine using Davinci Resolve. I don't understand why higher end CPU and GPU is tauted as a requirement for video editing.
I built my PC with 13900k - Zotac Rtx 4090 - Gskill 6000 MHz 128gb ram - msi z790 tomahawk ddr5 . But I have a question, how many MHz does your 128 GB ram run? PC doesn't run when opening XMP plz let me know.
If u have a dedicated graphics card installed, the iGPU will not work... what a load of BS , really it runs codecs ? I`ve been doing video editing and building workstations for about 12 years now. More cores is always better, also a fast M.2 will speed up your workflow a lot if especially if you have windows installed on it .
7:33 where are 64gb sticks? am i dreaming, or werent those available before? now i can only find naked ones, aka no heatsink or anything. i could swear these were available before… like, corsair and stuff and xpgs and whatnots… cant find them pn newegg, amazon us, amazon uk, amazon de, microcenter, tops are 32gb sticks. in other words, if you go mitx, youre capped at 64gb. unless youre ok with green pcb sticks. weird.
At one of the largest computer retailers in Germany (alternate), PC systems that can be ordered are only equipped with a maximum of 64 GB DDR 5 RAM, because 128 GB can lead to stability problems. A RAM bar has just broken on my system. Has anyone had similar experiences? I have a Gigabyte Z 790 aero g motherboard and otherwise only expensive components. I want this to run with 128 GB.
its because for more than 64gb you need 4 sticks of ram which puts more strain on the memory controller in the cpu. you can get 96gb with 2 sticks because there are now 48gb sticks of DDR5 available. if you want the full 128 or more you should expect to turn down the frequency.
Excellent video friend, thank you very much for the video. Please could you help me choose a PC, I currently already have an RTX 4070 Tuf. I'm thinking about updating everything else. I was thinking of purchasing an I7 12700k due to the current Amazon discounts which are around 239 USD, for the price I think it is better than the I5 13600k and the same as the i7 13700k and i7 14700k that the prices according to the % improvement I think not They are so big. Then an economical board just like this on discount like the Asus Z690 Rog Strix E gaming, which has good M2 PCI 4.0 ports, USB C and 1 Thunderbold for 240 USD and ram memory from 32 to 4,800 Hz (those hertz because that supports the processor and motherboard) I will look for the lowest CL I can, those rams are around 115 USD I think. An 850 W gold source and a good case. What do you think. I come from a Ryzen 7 3700x with 16 ram, I think it will be an excellent change, but I would like to know what you think. Greetings from Bolivia. Your videos are very helpful brother.
Is 32 GB enough for DaVinci resolve video editing I have tried to get four into 16 64 GB but on my motherboard it doesn't work and in our country DDR5 6000 cl32 32 GB single stick is not available
My igpu always at 0% usage even when I work on daVinci resolve. any solution my build ( z790 motherboard. i5 12600k . rtx 3070 ti. 32 gb ram. 1tb crucial nvme)
I really want to go 128gb on ram on my 3d pc but the fact that I cannot run all 4 sticks at 5200mhz worries me so I have decided to go 64gb dual rank sticks so i can run at 5200mhz
Can i use non K variant of cpu like 13900F, 13900, 12900, 12900F for 1 to 8 Hr long 4K video editing? And how much time will it take to render these 4K videos? Will it be OK to use??
You are very, very wrong about photos and GPU, it does matter, but as usual, on YT, your claims are based on little to no experience in the subject at hand, and there are a lot more photo editing software not only PS or Topaz. And once again as usual on YT since the components you are using, you don't have to buy, you go with the overkill and use 1000$+ GPU, and with a GPU as powerful as 4090 you can't conclude anything because it's too much power for photo editing! How about for a change maybe put some thought into what you are advising people, instead of just trying to make them use your affiliate link. You know about two photo editing software and you are telling people what is what in that subject. I know when I make my thumbnails....there is a lot more demanding stuff that people do...Ridiculous.
He uses the two most popular photo editing software in Photoshop and Lightroom. even Puget Benchmark, a popular comparison benchmarking tool for professionals uses the same software for their Photo Editing score. You can't possibly expect a video to cover every single software people use. In your wall of rant, you mention there are a lot more software out there, yet I don't see you list them? Maybe try to take a breath and suggest a software that a lot of people use and can be benchmarked, instead of belittling your fellow creator.
I just pointed out that he is giving advice with a great amount of confidence about topic he does not know almost anything about, and wrong advice at that. And pointed out flaws in what he does to make those conclusions and the list of software does not change that. And the reviews & specs of that card are widely available his benchmark is just a waste of time. As I said little to no experience and portrays himself as some kind of expert. @@AssassinKID
I’m a 3D animation student. So far, my 5900X, 3080ti 12Gig, and 128 gigs of ram served me well. With that being said, I haven’t had any super heavy projects and if I do, we have MONSTER PCs at school that I have access to if I ever need them. I would to upgrade to the latest and greatest but I don’t have that kind of money right now.
Finally someone approached the 3D workflow the right way! Congrats! That's why you are the best creator's channel! Just to add some information, if your workflow consists in modelling in Blender and rendering in Unreal with Lumen, you can go pretty far with an i5, 64 gb of RAM and an AMD or Intel ARC GPU with 16gb. The 4060 16gb makes a ton of sense here, too.
Are his advices also true for 3D CAD and simulation for engineers ?
@BaieDesBaies my experience with CAD and engineering software in general is that it is usually less intensive on hardware than other 3D applications. Also, they are poorly optimized and don't explore multi-threading very well, for example. So, an i9 won't be that much faster than an i5 90% of the time. If you use things like Inventor, AutoCAD, or Revit, you can do a lot of stuff with basically anything. I would only recommend max the ram and buy nvidia for compatibility issues. Even a rtx 2060 12gb will do a lot.
But, if you are going to use for finite element simulations, this can get pretty nasty, pretty fast. You can do stress analysis on Inventor for reasonably complex geometry with almost any PC. If you are going for fluid dynamics, most probably you'll need a threadripper.
From all this, the best advice is to find a way to estimate how much ram you'll need and build from there. Then, buy a Nvidia gpu with the most VRAM you can. In engineering applications, capacity is king, not raw speed. Finally, Puget systems have some good benchmarks on their site.
@@OficinadoArdito Thanks a lot for your extensive answer. I'm very far from these price ranges. I have my personnal desktop with 14600K, RTX 3080 and 16 Go DDR4 but I still need a laptop with tiny budget. Do you think new cranked up integrated graphics like Arc in Core Ultra H or Radeon 680M are good enough for 3D CAD ? What about a 6 Go laptop 3050 ? I won't push into the hardest tasks for the moment cause I am still an engineering student.
These comment sections are almost as valuable as this channel ive learned bajillions
Using Resolve with UHD timelines with stabilization, color grading, noise reduction and voice isolation I seldom see much over 16GB of RAM use. My system has 32GB and outside of complex Fusion constructs, it rarely uses more than about 60 percent of that.
Do you have the memory usage slider set to max on resolve?
This is an adjustable parameter in resolve mines set to 12gb, and it's not enough, although I'm editing on a potato lol
@@BUILDEMTORIDE Just set it to max and let Windows handle the memory allocations.
GPU export changes the game for Lightroom exports. My 5950X was reasonably quick but my RTX3080 exports in less than half the time.
Thanks to your suggestions I built a dual RTX4090 workstation + Threadripper for my 3d workflow.
how did you fit two video cards onto one motherboard? What size case did you use?
Fractal Design Meshify 2XL
That's what rich people do. Do not have to choose or think, just buy the most expensive one in the market 😂
One of the most important things for video creators is big and fast hard drive. The fastest CPU and GPU can't compensate slow hard drive or bad configuration of multiple hard drives.
I think he's going to do a full ProArt build with that ram. It matches the color scheme perfectly.
Lightroom AI noise reduction pin my RTX4080 to the max.
I run all my wedding church and dancing shots through AI noise reduction.
Takes about 4sec per image and if you have to do 300 images time add up.
Also smart masking like select sky or teeth whitening works so fast.
On my old PC I was constantly waiting for task to be completed.
I agree 64GB ddr5 RAM is a sweet spot for photography.
Lightroom, Photoshop, Spotify and Plex server running in the background can take upto 40GB easily.
I'm curious about the denoise and bokeh features that lightroom released recently. Seems like there's not a lot of info regarding all these AI features that Adobe has released in the last year and how it affects PC performance. I have an older 2070 super and anytime I apply the new AI denoise to an image I have to walk away from my pc because it throttles my GPU.
@nathanielmartin6631 Yes Denoise hits GPU hard. They updated bokeh but didn't try it yet. First bokeh implementation was not good I believe it's still in the beta stage.
@@TomasRamoskaindeed. I'm hoping to upgrade my graphics card once the next Gen cards get released and get a deal on this generations cards, but I'm not sure what benchmarks I need to be looking to make a good decision. Videos like this are like your CPU is more important, which may have been true in the past but graphics cards are now a lot more important since these new features have been released.
I’m currently stuck with a 1080 ti that I got like 7 years ago, it’s super slow on Lightroom. I’m looking at purchasing a rx 7900 rtx 24 gb since it’s cheaper than a 4080 or a 4090. Would that still be good for Lightroom?
@asher791 7900xtx should work extremely well. I run all my wedding images throughout the enhance - denoise at 50% default value. (I used to run just church and dance images but now run everything, feature smart enough to leave low ISO files with minimum effect)
Speed depends on file size if you shoot 24mpx raw files should take about 3-4sec per image. I recommend running Denoise after you finish your edit. Just before you are ready to take files into Photoshop.
Adobe did amazing work. ISO6400 looks like ISO100 with all sharpness preserved.
This why you're currently one of my favorite PC tech channel! Keep it up, love to know more about content creation PC stuff.
Oh btw as a commercial photographer myself - 32GB is plenty sufficient. 16GB minimum. Of course I guess it depends on what the person photographs, if it's many 45MP RAW files and doing editing then yeah maybe. In the end it's what the person is doing but 32GB is plenty sufficient really and most people will get it all done with 16GB.
Ditto to the video part too, at least I feel that way. Video editing for example, many software doesn't use GPU for work. Davinci Resolve for example doesn't enable GPU acceleration unless you're using Studio version. So for fast video work generally it's CPU first ahead of everything else. GPU is handy, I tried using GTX 1050 for my 4K video work recently and it was sluggish - personally I'd recommend 3060 12GB being a good one. I'm using 8GB VRAM GPU but some work does hit a limit with 8GB, not for me but for some people I know.
Awesome video!! Would love to see something similar for Music Producers & Streamers 🙏🏾
for 3d, Corona renderer and Vray are CPU-based but Vray can use GPU or even both but the best results can be otten from rendering with CPU. GPU is crazy fast but the results do not look as good as CPU.
But to be honest a wonderful video none the less
Thank you so much for making this video it was one of my requests in the old comments and glad that it’s been noticed by you
Keep them coming love them all. Like I am one the first few who views the video as it’s released 😅
I'm a software developer. For me, everything is bottleneck 😅 Yes, GPU is also a bottleneck, because, at the end of the day, I play as hell 😂
what?
i9 13900K at 100 degs Celcius is shocking - CPU cooler is the bottleneck for this particular case 😄
its designed to push power until it hits 100C. its literally how it works now on modern cpus.
I wish you talked a little about thermal control,using water-cooled or air cooled. Not sure if this is true or false: I've always bought bigger cases with good air throughput because with a bigger case there is a larger volume of space to radiate heat.
Although if I had a case with 3 push in fans in the front, 3 fans on top pulling out and 2 fans at the rear. Using the same fans, the smaller box would have a higher density of air and would cool better than a larger box. Do you place your cases on the floor or on the desk?
I also wish you would compare data cable and other cable quality.A scape on the lowest sata cable or a break break at the connector went on fire and destroyed almost every component. Besides that, shorter cables are faster if they have the correct end connectors.
How about doing a video on NAS drives and which ones are better for creators.. thanks
Fr
A larger case is easier to get decent airflow through than a smaller case. But at the same time you are not incorrect in that it takes longer to exchange the total air volume in a larger case if the same number and type of fans are used. But it is harder to get the airflow optimal in that smaller case.
So either way it's a trade off.
It might be worth considering using even more fans in a larger case, that way you can have them set to a lower fan speed and still get even faster air exchange in the case. This can result in lower sound pressure.
Another question is water cooling or not, and if so is it worth going for a open loop or using a AIO (All In One, a closed loop that is installed as is). The open loop is more expensive, more modular, more efficient and more dangerous as any mistakes can make them more likely to leak.
Really good air coolers are actually pretty close to the performance of simpler open loops or AIO coolers. But a open loop can be designed to use several radiators and can be used to cool not only the CPU but also any GPU in the system.
Now being a boring unimaginative guy I'd say go for a large case and air cooling, or possibly a quality AIO. This makes the system easy to work on, reliable and somewhat cost effective. But like I said I'm a boring old cuss. I want a big case with out a single window of glass panel. I don't need to look at my computer, I need it to do it's job and the less I see of it the better.
You may have very different priorities, so consider that when reading this.
Being a "Function over Form" guy I think that if you go open loop then definitely go with a soft line system. Hardline cooling loops look good, but can be a pain to work with should you ever have to swap parts.
As for AIO I'm partial for the Arctic Cooling products, especially those without RGB.
I told you I'm boring!
The Arctic AIOs are not sexy and a bit bulkier than most others, but they have excellent cooling and comes in versions without RGB... 😁
Oh, and they are among the cheaper coolers even though they out performs almost all comparable AIO coolers no matter the price.
Thanks so much sir! You've been so helpful over the years...and I've built 2 machines based off of the things I've learned from this channel. Still the ONLY creator focused tech/PC channel out there!
Now...a controversial request. Agree with it or not...Ai is quickly becoming very much a part of the creative workflow. I'm a vfx artist...and one of the ways we try to remain ethical with using ai is to train our own ai models for visuals (watch corridor crews videos on how they did their second ai anime short). But anyways yes...more and more creators, like it or not, will be forced into a similar workflow. So, wondering if you would consider looking into hardware/workflow suggestions for that (growing) niche of creators. 🤔
I filled up my 3dgb RAM & 150GB disk cache while editing in Photoshop and is now considering to upgrade to the 13th generation Intel processor due to its DDR4 support.
Hi, can you please do a premiere pro video comparing 8gb 16gb 32gb 64gb 96gb and 128gb and if it makes a difference in any parts, rendering, editing, timeline etc. Please also do 2 channel vs 4 channel, that would be very much appreciated. I run 2x32gb in my editing rig at the moment for my main channel (not this), so your videos help me a lot.
Thank you for this. Great info for content creators.
Some tips for those who want to start in 3D animation from an amateur 3D animator:
1- Having more VRAM on your GPU doesn't necessarily mean faster rendering.
2- Always optimize your scene; it doesn't matter if you have a 4090. An optimized scene will make things easier for both your GPU and you.
3- In a 3D environment, the CPU is mainly for hair and fluid simulations, while the GPU is for rendering (which takes much more time). So, you'll be okay with a mid-tier CPU if you have a high-end GPU.
4- 32GB of RAM is really good for a 3D animation PC
These are some tips that I've learned as an amateur/hobby 3D animator.
64GB of RAM and at least a decent 6 core CPU should do the job. GPU is on 3rd place of priorities 😀😊
Your videos are great and were very helpful building my latest PC, my main use is for audio (recording studio), I just wish you had more videos about that subject or other channels who talk about performance in the same detail you so.
Excellently explained. Thank you for this lovely video. Lots of love from Tech Smash Hindi
I know the video is a bit older… Fast storage / size and the right ports (Type C, Thunderbolt…) are way more important for a photo editing workflow. Get the right motherboard with all the ports you need. You can still upgrade the CPU and GPU in the future for cheap on the used market… My workstation is a bit older now (going on for 4 years now) and the only thing I upgraded was to more storage to dump memory card onto… A fast card reader on Type C or TB is key if you need to speed up your workflow and not spend time on waiting,,,
11:40 and you can buy a Intel ARC A770 at half the price and have 16GB of VRAM.
I bought one and its going to be paired with my 2990WX Threadripper.
Great work, I've watched tons of your video and they have helped me so much - Thank you.
this IS the channel for all content creators. Keep them coming. Always look forward to your content. I always thought AMD would be better. Since seeing your video, I would have to say Intel and Nvidia is still the way to go. Many thanks
Did you just call a bottlenecked CPU a “sleepy U” at 2:06
cause thats amazing
are you excited for raptor lake refresh tomorrow?
No
Speaking about your 3 cameras, how are you changing cameras while recording? Are they all recording and you edit the footage? Or are you changing cameras remotely?
All 3 cameras arw recording simultaneously and then he makes cuts and edits in post production.
Haven't yet seen anyone run Davinci Resolve benchmarks on the RX 7800 XT. Is this something you plan to do at some point? Thanks.
There is always a bottleneck in a pc. Always. It can depend on the task that you are doing with it.
it's ideal when the bottleneck is the dude on the chair editing
my work overlaps a lot between 3d and 2d, namely for designing patterns in 2d and converting to 3d later on
I might remember this time of my carrer later in the future as a youtube creator, started now by just shooting 2.5K footage on a very old obsolete gopro hero 4 black, lol, and editing it on a vivo v9 small lcd screen using a free app, exporting it to 4k. Now you can view 4k of my shorts or almost a minute cover. Haha. Who knows, if everything become goods, we can upgrade, and it might be a massive jump. 😂
Thanks to Tech Notice channel! 😊
You can see it in my guitar cover videos. Thank you guys!
Definitely intrigued by the 96gb per ram stick you mentioned! Just searched Newegg and don't see any of the like. Looking to upgrade my video editing pc with 5950x, rtx 3090, and 64gb (4x16) CL14 3600 MHz ram soon next year once the next gen processors start releasing. Might even look into Xeon or Threadripper if they come out with new ones (and prices are humane). As my video projects have gotten more dynamic, and performance has not been up to par with my expectations.
An 850w PSU is what came with my 4090. Not sure if perhaps I should have gotten a larger capacity.
My Project files drive (Firecuda 530 4tb) and OS drive (Firecuda 530 2tb) are good to stay. Cache drive should be good enough to stay, not sure (Samsung 960Evo 500gb).
Also hoping Fractal Design come out with an updated Torrent case model that has more cable management space, hard drive storage space, and cmore compatible with AIO's. Seems to be the only case supporting large 180mm fans.
He meant 96gb total. Two 48gb sticks.
What about vector creator PCs? Like adobe illustrator etc?
You mentioned to never get the KF of a CPU because it lacks a iGPU, but what are your thoughts on KS? Also, does a specific RAM CL make a difference? Thanks!
The Core i9 13900KS is just a slightly higher clocked and hotter running version of the Core i9 13900K. In all other things it's the same. So it is just as good or bad for whatever you are doing as the K version. Well it might be a little faster, but you also have to make sure you have the cooling to keep it from heat throttling. And yes, it is running a lot hotter than the K version. So hot that you might actually get worse performance unless you really beef up the cooling.
Puget Systems has looked at the Core i9 13900KS and compared it to the K version and AMD R9-7950X. The Intel CPU's smoked the R9 in just about everything they threw at them, but the KS was only marginally faster than the K version of the Core i9 processor in most cases.
For details Google: puget systems "Intel Core i9 13900KS Content Creation Review"
They have benched Photoshop, Lightroom, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve and more.
-KS CPUs are just slightly boosted chips from the get-go, aka "silicon lottery winners" (6GHz for the 13900KS vs 5.8GHz for the 13900K), at a ~$200 "markup" depending on who you ask. It does come with an iGPU so Quick Sync is available, but you gotta ask yourself if the 200MHz clock boost is worth the almost $200 price increase, not including the cost required to keep that chip under decent temps, without having to let it thermal throttle.
As for the memory latency question, I'm not super expert in that regard, but from what I know, yes but "it depends".
CL timing, along with its transfer rate, help determine how long it takes for the memory to read a stored word (how quick it can react to an action), or "first word latency", so for example, a DDR4 3200MT/s CL16 kit is "equivalent" to a DDR4 3600MT/s CL18 kit, both with a first word latency of 10 nanoseconds (ns). This is calculated by multiplying the CAS timing by 2000, and the result is divided by the transfer rate.
With some tighter (lower) CAS timings and higher frequencies, the memory could run slightly quicker, at the possible cost of stability. Following the previous example, now if we compare the previous two against a 3200 CL14 kit or 3600 CL16, the latter would be faster with a first word latency of ~8.7-8.8ns.
Extra manual tuning, memory binning, and system stability, are all factors to consider as well. If you want the best performance you could try overclocking and manually tuning your RAM, or if you want to make sure stability is your top priority, especially with current DDR5, you could either run the kit at their XMP/EXPO values or at the motherboard's default config without enabling XMP/EXPO.
@@djGLCKR Holy shit dude, thank you so much for the info! I’ll have to dig more into it based on what you’ve shared, but I appreciate it
I would like to see your handling of a Xeon build that is well balance for photo and video but the best for 3D, which of the many Xeons would you pick and the other components and your reasoning process to decide just to have something dedicated to the Intel people.
Question about Gen5 NVME (T700). What I know is, that a benchmark like puget Bench for DR, will run faster when the testfiles are placed on a Gen4 than when they are placed on a Gen3 NVME drive, most others have no bottleneck, so they have the same speed. I know that only this view Filetipes should be even faster on a Gen5 NVME. Now what I don't know is, if it brings a bigger benefit when the OS and the DR installations would be on a GEN5 drive, or if it is better to have there let's say 8K-RAW data, let's say for the benchmark the Puget Bench files. I am thinking to get a T700, but I still struggle with the desition.
OS dosen't really matter if its on gen 5 or even a sata drive beyond boot up time which may take a couple extra seconds. Better to save your gen 5 for the big files you need.
would love to see you use 2 amd gpu together, now the question is can a 7000 series gpu work with a 6000 series gpu and share each other when placed in a system.
Thanks for all these great videos! They've actually inspired me to build my own PC not too long ago. But I've run into some issues with Lightroom even with a 13900k. I have a 4070Ti and it seems that the 12GB VRAM tends to be the bottleneck for CR2 and CR3 images for me. This is especially noticeable when opening a dual monitor setup and trying to zoom in at 100% on the second monitor while at the same time having the photo open on the first monitor. The image just doesn't load and shows up as black, or sometimes only loads partially at a lower resolution, at the same time bringing LR to a complete halt. Has anyone else experienced this issue as well? It just seems crazy to me that having 2 photos open would slow it down that much.
Just double checking all drivers and software as well as Windows are up to date?
@@theTechNoticeYeah, I’ve even got the Intel Driver & Support Assistant as well as the NVIDIA software (on the creator version of the drivers) to check any new updates.
@@ivanvelasco3757 what ram are you using in ur pc?
What is the best setup for Solidworks 3D modeling and AutoCAD 2D detailing (with no animation rendering work required)?
TIA
Would u say itss ok to pair the 4090 with I7-13700K?
Looking to build an editing beast! Do you think it's worth waiting for new gen processors or going with i9?
Go with the last gen 13900k ;)
Can you do a PC build for Audio production? Using multiple Virtual instruments, plugins etc. Also, lowest latency for recording audio?
Great video!!!!! I’ve learned a lot.
So I’m torn. I had a 13900k but swapped to a 7950x3d because of stability issues. Now I see some weird system stutter with ryzen. I have 2 days left to return my product. I kinda wanna go back to intel because when it worked it was amazing.
Bear in mind that current RAM chips are 16 GBit or the newer 24 GBit, so 32GB or the newer 48GB individual sticks are double sided and thus put the equivalent load of 2 single sided sticks on the IMC. These WILL struggle to hit their XMP speeds! I 'downgraded' from 64GB 6400 to 48GB 8000MTs to use the newer 24GB single sided sticks.
Ok .editing a single photo is one thing (single core)
I do macro focused stacked full frame (12 to 42 mp) 35mm
Typically stackin up to 250 frames
I need horsepower this is oct 24
Cpu/gpu Suggestins please 🙏
Ai denoize made buy a new 4070... it s crazy the difference in time with my old one
What’s the Best Value Best Bang-4-buck Video card ?
Arc a750
I'm going to use a 3900X / 2070 Super (or 2080Ti) system with 32GB of RAM to teach myself DaVinci Resolve. I don't own an AM5 system but might go that way when Zen 5 releases. Meantime, I'll be using the AM4 I already have. Thoughts?
How important is the motherboard itself in the selection of building a rig? Looking for some ideas for 2024.
It should be something that won't make the system work slower than intended, like a motherboard with poor power delivery paired with a power-hungry CPU.
Some people will try to go for the cheapest thing that'll do the job without being WAY too cheap construction-wise, like no heatsinks on the MOSFETs/chokes, subpar power delivery compared to other slightly more expensive models, no SSD heatsinks, poor audio codec, and the list goes on. Others will go for whatever fits their needs without breaking the bank - a decent amount of rear I/O ports, certain internal connectivity like front-panel high-speed USB-C, extra m.2 slots, all within a specific price range. And there's the other group that gets the most expensive stuff for "reasons", but if it's something you want/need and it fits your requirements, go ham ($1.2K MSI MEG Z790 Godlike, anyone?).
The way I go for choosing a motherboard is taking the middle-of-the-road approach, looking for something that will fit my needs without breaking the bank. I tend to look at power delivery (9-12 phases), m.2 slots (2 is more than enough for most people, but 3 slots can be useful), rear USB slots (at least 6 USB type A, at least one USB-C), MAYBE some wireless connectivity, or the option to install a 2230 Wi-Fi card (i.e.: some ASRock motherboards come with a "dedicated" 2230 m.2 E-key slot for a Wi-Fi + BT card), MAYBE a front-panel USB-C header, sufficient 4-pin PWM + 3-pin ARGB headers, and a $200 cap.
when it comes to motherboards you really just need to know what features you want, most high end motherboards are just bloated with useless features, I would say the most important thing is the chipset (ie z690, z790, x670, b550m etc). I would say 150$ for a motherboard is a good spot to start. This guy used the Asus ProArt a lot, and the benefit to it is the sound card built in, it's a lot better than most motherboards.
@@djGLCKRso is the Asus Proart Z790 a bottleneck for the i9-13900k?
@@Prabhu_njd It's more than capable. If anything, maybe try to stick to two RAM sticks to avoid any potential instability issues with DDR5 (if using XMP).
Gotta make sure the cooling solution can keep up with the heat output.
Has the whole 4 sticks of RAM thing been settled? I'm building a new creator PC. ProArt Z790 Creator motherboard, 13th Gen i9 with a RTX 4090. I'd like to do 128 GB of DDR5 RAM. I'd like to go with Corsair Dominator but they only offer 64 GB (2x32) kits. Asus only lists Kingston Fury Beast RAM as compatible (4x32 GB) kit to get 128 GB. What do you recommend? I prefer the Corsair kits better.
Go with the corsair then, the QVL really means little since they can't test with every brand and ram is pretty much identical anyways.
@@Born_Stellar I was thinking the same thing. Buy two of the Corsair 64GB kits. If I have any trouble running 4 sticks, I’ll just remove two of the. Just run on one 64GB kit. I can’t seem to get a straight answer from Asus or Corsair when I contacted them. Perhaps Intel 14900k will offer better RAM support and motherboard choices.
Yes you and I are on the same page with this. I too can't seem to get a straight answer on this 4 sticks of RAM issue. I want 128GB of RAM because I'm a video editor with heavy After Effects animations. I'm looking at 14900k just like you. Let's update this thread as we get answers, help each other out. Cheers!
Often people migrate some of their components to the newer build. Does it make sense to move over older SSDs including M.2 drives? Also I have an Invidia 1070 gpu. Should bring that over as well?
Great point to talk!!
just built a pc for photo editing.
amd 5600x with 32gb ddr4 3200mhz ram i have a rx 580 8gb gpu and i need to upgrade it but don't know what to buy for budget with matching performance with cpu
If your target RAM is 32 GB for example...is there any benefit/detriment to having ONE 32gb card installed, as opposed to TWO 16gb cards (aside from obviously having to discard them if you want to upgrade)? Performance wise, any difference?
In my current build I have a Ryzen 9 5900X, ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC graphics card, Asus ROG Strix B550-E Motherboard. I just bought a ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC graphic card. Should I upgrade to a Ryzen 9 7950x 6-core, 32-thread and ASUS ROG Strix B650E-E Motherboard? Thanks
hi, can you please suggest for GPU
processor 13500
MB asus B660 ddr4
Ram 3200mhz 32gb
air cooler
PSU Corsair VS600 80 Plus
GPU currently using K2200 from my previous build, want to upgrade for DaVinci (for max 4K & 15 mins videos for YT) & Solidworks with moderate use, is 4060 8gb ok ??
and Zotac 2fan for 3+2 y warranty or gigabyte for 3 fans (both are bit similar at pricing in India
Hi Thank you that is really helpfull, Can you make a video for AI art generation with Stable Diffusion SDXL, They suggest minimum 8GB vram and Nvidia Graphics card, What would be your suggestion for a budget PC Configuration. I belive you are the right guy to give some suggestion, Thank you
Very helpful thanks
I am running a B450 Steel Legend, Ryzen 7 5700X, 32gb ram, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. And I feel I get a bottleneck. I am thinking of upgrade to Ryzen 9 7950x, and RTX3060. how much improvement would I see?? I don't see a coffee buy???
depends what you do :)
@@theTechNotice resolve 18.+. video work
My system has a Ryzen 5 5600G and 16GB or RAM and no discrete GPU. I am able to edit 4K video just fine using Davinci Resolve. I don't understand why higher end CPU and GPU is tauted as a requirement for video editing.
I built my PC with 13900k - Zotac Rtx 4090 - Gskill 6000 MHz 128gb ram - msi z790 tomahawk ddr5 . But I have a question, how many MHz does your 128 GB ram run? PC doesn't run when opening XMP plz let me know.
Is photoshop doing Ai work remotely? I have have a plugin to do the AI editing locally and having latest & strongest gpu does make a huge difference.
If u have a dedicated graphics card installed, the iGPU will not work... what a load of BS , really it runs codecs ? I`ve been doing video editing and building workstations for about 12 years now. More cores is always better, also a fast M.2 will speed up your workflow a lot if especially if you have windows installed on it .
whats that thing glowing on the right of the front fans at 15:00
How is the 7800xt with things like Blender and Pro E?
7:33 where are 64gb sticks? am i dreaming, or werent those available before? now i can only find naked ones, aka no heatsink or anything. i could swear these were available before… like, corsair and stuff and xpgs and whatnots… cant find them pn newegg, amazon us, amazon uk, amazon de, microcenter, tops are 32gb sticks. in other words, if you go mitx, youre capped at 64gb. unless youre ok with green pcb sticks. weird.
What about 4060 ti 16gb vram for blender ?
At one of the largest computer retailers in Germany (alternate), PC systems that can be ordered are only equipped with a maximum of 64 GB DDR 5 RAM, because 128 GB can lead to stability problems. A RAM bar has just broken on my system. Has anyone had similar experiences? I have a Gigabyte Z 790 aero g motherboard and otherwise only expensive components. I want this to run with 128 GB.
its because for more than 64gb you need 4 sticks of ram which puts more strain on the memory controller in the cpu. you can get 96gb with 2 sticks because there are now 48gb sticks of DDR5 available. if you want the full 128 or more you should expect to turn down the frequency.
You mean my 9 year old Intel i7 5820k is holding my back my 4090?!?
How could I know that?!?
I used to have that CPU :)
at 02:07 he says sleepe u lol
Are those new 14th gen intel CPU’s on the table ???
Excellent video friend, thank you very much for the video.
Please could you help me choose a PC, I currently already have an RTX 4070 Tuf. I'm thinking about updating everything else. I was thinking of purchasing an I7 12700k due to the current Amazon discounts which are around 239 USD, for the price I think it is better than the I5 13600k and the same as the i7 13700k and i7 14700k that the prices according to the % improvement I think not They are so big. Then an economical board just like this on discount like the Asus Z690 Rog Strix E gaming, which has good M2 PCI 4.0 ports, USB C and 1 Thunderbold for 240 USD and ram memory from 32 to 4,800 Hz (those hertz because that supports the processor and motherboard) I will look for the lowest CL I can, those rams are around 115 USD I think. An 850 W gold source and a good case. What do you think. I come from a Ryzen 7 3700x with 16 ram, I think it will be an excellent change, but I would like to know what you think.
Greetings from Bolivia. Your videos are very helpful brother.
Is 32 GB enough for DaVinci resolve video editing I have tried to get four into 16 64 GB but on my motherboard it doesn't work and in our country DDR5 6000 cl32 32 GB single stick is not available
Who caught the sleepy u pun 😂
My igpu always at 0% usage even when I work on daVinci resolve. any solution
my build ( z790 motherboard. i5 12600k . rtx 3070 ti. 32 gb ram. 1tb crucial nvme)
Depends on the video codec…
nice video
É nítido quando uma publicidade é paga...
RTX 3060: I'll just leave
Mine doesn’t bottleneck it has a 13900 😂 i9 4070 32gb ddr5
First :)) Nice Vid ;)
I really want to go 128gb on ram on my 3d pc but the fact that I cannot run all 4 sticks at 5200mhz worries me so I have decided to go 64gb dual rank sticks so i can run at 5200mhz
2:06 SleePU
Can i use non K variant of cpu like 13900F, 13900, 12900, 12900F for 1 to 8 Hr long 4K video editing? And how much time will it take to render these 4K videos? Will it be OK to use??
RTX 3060 have 12gb :)
3:33 - For creators (editing photos, videos), the most important part of the computer is the monitor :))) fool
What? No consideration for audio creators ,, 'again' !!
Have a look at my Daw build ;)
Nvidia are awful to their customers, AMD added 16GB Vram for their mid range cards compared to Nvidia.
yeah and Nvidia now owns 94% of the GPU market. More people buy Nvidia especially for content creation.
looks like u did a hair implant
You are very, very wrong about photos and GPU, it does matter, but as usual, on YT, your claims are based on little to no experience in the subject at hand, and there are a lot
more photo editing software not only PS or Topaz. And once again as usual on YT since the components you are using, you don't have to buy, you go with the overkill
and use 1000$+ GPU, and with a GPU as powerful as 4090 you can't conclude anything because it's too much power for photo editing! How about for a change maybe put
some thought into what you are advising people, instead of just trying to make them use your affiliate link. You know about two photo editing software and you are telling people
what is what in that subject. I know when I make my thumbnails....there is a lot more demanding stuff that people do...Ridiculous.
He uses the two most popular photo editing software in Photoshop and Lightroom. even Puget Benchmark, a popular comparison benchmarking tool for professionals uses the same software for their Photo Editing score.
You can't possibly expect a video to cover every single software people use. In your wall of rant, you mention there are a lot more software out there, yet I don't see you list them?
Maybe try to take a breath and suggest a software that a lot of people use and can be benchmarked, instead of belittling your fellow creator.
I just pointed out that he is giving advice with a great amount of confidence about
topic he does not know almost anything about, and wrong advice at that. And pointed out flaws in what he does to make those conclusions and the list of software does not change that. And the reviews & specs of that card are widely available his benchmark is just a waste of time. As I said little to no experience and portrays himself as some kind of expert.
@@AssassinKID
He did not say it did not matter.. he said it matters less than the CPU.
bro did you shave your eyebrows lmao??
LOL, just had to rewatch it.... it does look like I have LOL!
But I haven't I think it's the CAP #TNmerch