Down size the engine and put turbo charger to maintain the performance can decrease the engine life and reliability..because of the force induction consep
that's one of the points these people are subjected, more users demands are on performance and fuel consumption, disregarding the longevity of the engine, because if you cared for your car enough, it would still cope up long enough and you had less worries on fuel costs till that time comes
@@endurofan9854 yup..i own ford eco boost 1.0L..only the problem is when its come to long distance driving around 700+ km i can feel permformance drop a little..mybe because of engine heat and stress..
Down size the engine and put turbo charger to maintain the performance can decrease the engine life and reliability..because of the force induction consep
But we save more money on fuel.
@@Norfaizan-wb5wx yes..just for the fuel only
that's one of the points these people are subjected,
more users demands are on performance and fuel consumption, disregarding the longevity of the engine, because if you cared for your car enough, it would still cope up long enough and you had less worries on fuel costs till that time comes
@@endurofan9854 yup..i own ford eco boost 1.0L..only the problem is when its come to long distance driving around 700+ km i can feel permformance drop a little..mybe because of engine heat and stress..
15% is not good at all.
What other solutions is better and has higher fuel and emissions savings?
@@mynameisschezuan is it better to save fuel 15% and build the whole new car so much more often because they are junk?