I'm Not Like You
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 сер 2024
- Photography, cameras. Canon vs Nikon and Sony. Full frame vs aps-c and micro four loser thirds.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, the Nikon 200-600mm will come with a pack of sunflower seeds to automatically feed birds and wildlife in front of you with no way of focusing that close. It will be great.
Fuji XT4 amzn.to/31wORkb or bhpho.to/3mXJUs0
Fuji 70-300mm bhpho.to/3qoRhen
Fuji 100-400mm amzn.to/3J7Y0jO or USED amzn.to/3HZgsJO or bhpho.to/3fXB6OQ or USED bhpho.to/3tV3VDN
Panasonic GH6 bhpho.to/3LI6cc7
Panasonic 100-400mm amzn.to/3M6btu6 or USED amzn.to/3IzsLxE or bhpho.to/3FZ69Vd
Leica 50-200mm amzn.to/3J1joHj or USED amzn.to/3vW6qqG or bhpho.to/3tJT1iA
Panasonic 1.4x teleconverter amzn.to/3I0OCwE or USED amzn.to/3tLI7c9 or bhpho.to/366BIA6
Panasonic 2x teleconverter amzn.to/3tK99k3 or USED amzn.to/3Jdv8q0 or bhpho.to/3pUn1Hs
Olympus OM-1 amzn.to/3gW4dCT or bhpho.to/3H2adVf
Olympus EM1 III amzn.to/3rxEXJn or bhpho.to/3dp7UPL
Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 amzn.to/3oILuix or bhpho.to/3u2pfr5
Olympus 100-400mm amzn.to/3hTGsfd or USED amzn.to/3vZNszh or bhpho.to/3FZ69Vd
Olympus 300mm f4 pro amzn.to/3MBLQBN or USED amzn.to/3KCnrKB or bhpho.to/3CtDw2e or USED bhpho.to/3CvyKBc
Sony A7S III bhpho.to/3yeUW0q
Sony 100-400mm GM f4.5-5.6 amzn.to/3ISX6a7 or bhpho.to/3IQRQ6Y
Sony 2x Teleconverter amzn.to/3h9qm0F or bhpho.to/3hhMrda
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/3fz3iHF or bhpho.to/3GnpNuq or used! bhpho.to/3H1UYeQ
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetable...
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos / vegetablepolice
T-shirts and merch! vegetablepolice.threadless.com/
My Monkey Strength ebook payhip.com/b/VyEG
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off vegetablepolice.bandcamp.com/
Instagram / vegetablepolice
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! share.shopqlink.com/554.html
My Health Channel Vegetable Police / canadianwargod
My Music Channel Stern Beats / @sternbeatsmusic - Комедії
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, the Nikon 200-600mm will come with a pack of sunflower seeds to automatically feed birds and wildlife in front of you with no way of focusing that close. It will be great.
Fuji XT4 amzn.to/31wORkb or bhpho.to/3mXJUs0
Fuji 70-300mm bhpho.to/3qoRhen
Fuji 100-400mm amzn.to/3J7Y0jO or USED amzn.to/3HZgsJO or bhpho.to/3fXB6OQ or USED bhpho.to/3tV3VDN
Panasonic GH6 bhpho.to/3LI6cc7
Panasonic 100-400mm amzn.to/3M6btu6 or USED amzn.to/3IzsLxE or bhpho.to/3FZ69Vd
Leica 50-200mm amzn.to/3J1joHj or USED amzn.to/3vW6qqG or bhpho.to/3tJT1iA
Panasonic 1.4x teleconverter amzn.to/3I0OCwE or USED amzn.to/3tLI7c9 or bhpho.to/366BIA6
Panasonic 2x teleconverter amzn.to/3tK99k3 or USED amzn.to/3Jdv8q0 or bhpho.to/3pUn1Hs
Olympus OM-1 amzn.to/3gW4dCT or bhpho.to/3H2adVf
Olympus EM1 III amzn.to/3rxEXJn or bhpho.to/3dp7UPL
Olympus 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 amzn.to/3oILuix or bhpho.to/3u2pfr5
Olympus 100-400mm amzn.to/3hTGsfd or USED amzn.to/3vZNszh or bhpho.to/3FZ69Vd
Olympus 300mm f4 pro amzn.to/3MBLQBN or USED amzn.to/3KCnrKB or bhpho.to/3CtDw2e or USED bhpho.to/3CvyKBc
Sony A7S III bhpho.to/3yeUW0q
Sony 100-400mm GM f4.5-5.6 amzn.to/3ISX6a7 or bhpho.to/3IQRQ6Y
Sony 2x Teleconverter amzn.to/3h9qm0F or bhpho.to/3hhMrda
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/3fz3iHF or bhpho.to/3GnpNuq or used! bhpho.to/3H1UYeQ
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
You forgot to pin this so it will get lost and nobody will buy stuff. Or maybe this is purposeful to stop photographers
Hahaha, minimum focus distance trap!
Buy black sunflower seeds, you'll will thank me later
Since you have all these fancy long zoom lenses, start filming concerts. Instead of squirrels, birds and other boring critters. And don't give me that "oh, concert security won't allow cameras". Don't be a wuss like your viewers are. Just do it. Do it!! Or is there nothing else to do in Canada. No concerts, no shows, no entertainment in Canada but just outdoor critters. Or you're just becoming an old UA-camr wuss? I think you're becoming an old scared wuss. Prove me wrong and just sneak them into a concert. I'm just kidding, no I'm not. Yeah... I am...but just do it. Even squirrels scare you. You don't film them anymore. Just birds and fish that don't attack. I'm kidding...no I'm not. Just do it...wuss...
ua-cam.com/video/dM7ej4Nphgo/v-deo.html - Bumble bees I shot today. Calling you out Kasey, that Sony doesn't stand a chance to a master of manual focus. I recorded these shots with that Panny boy 100-400 ... handheld 1080p 120fps ... converted to Rec709 with my custom LUT I created using my DSC Labs ChromaMatch Pro color chart, then exposure adjusted with about 2 stops of leeway, tone mapped in Resolve manually so I have nice highlight rolloff. That's right, "color science" is irrelevant to an armchair colorist. Recorded on GH5 II with Flat photo style and +3 saturation to maintain color bit depth. 8 bit video glory shot at 120fps slow motion and 1:1 pixel readout sensor crop (where's that at in 1080 on Sony ... missing in action lol cuz phutagrapher camera) resulting in roughly 2000 millimeter equivalent focal length, hand held shots at 6 to 8 feet away from subjects. Not perfect but way better than what you may typically see. Full frame wildlife telephoto doesn't have that nice minimum focus distance. Oh and 1080p shots converted to 4K using Video Enhance AI software. This scrub is onto something. It's not always about gear but understanding and technique :)
I've been watching this channel for years, and I Haven't Learned a Damn Thing!!!!!
(Forget the fact, I've never owned a camera.)
Who would have thought that being the target of intended offence would have made my day! Thanks for the recommandation, I also hate the "no slow mo" on the G85 and I might just pile up a bit and upgrade for an XT4, unless.. you have other suggestions?
If you don't mind saving a little more, I'd say wait to see what Fuji says about the HX2 at the end of May before getting the X-T4
@@MWB_FoolsParadisePictures Thanks for the tip! I'm not in a hurry so I'll wait to see
Just wondering : If you have kids with a girl named Dupuis-Latulipe, what will their surname be ?
@@phpn99 my wife's surname is Seguin-Brodeur. We didn't know what to do so we just gave up and decided not to have kids.
I have a g85 and the 100-400. Works great so long as there's enough light; I've had no quality issues with it all and have been carrying it everywhere. Also, don't discredit some legacy glass strapped to your g85. I've been using some old Canon FD lenses to play with different focal lengths, manual focus, and faster apertures. The major limiting factor that I don't see folks talking about is the noise and light. The G85 performs well below iso 1,000 but quickly falls apart above that (when it's not bright outside, you can shoot iso 6,400 in full light and it looks fine). So for wildlife, using faster primes (ie an adapted 50mmf1.7) can really help keep the iso down so you retain image quality. There's so much more nature out there in the dawn/dusk hours than when there's good bright light. Lastly, an adapted 70-200f2.8 would likely work really well.
If you wanna upgrade. Save your money and get that dream camera. Fuji, Sony, Canon, Nikon. I upgraded to Sony and the IQ is on a whole other level. Still using G85+100-400 for wildlife though (until i get that 150-600).
"You haven't been blown in weeks" killed me...
Thank you for bringing us the comedy and thoughtful tests and presentations.
I wish Kelsey would do more monkey vlogs. I subscribed for monkey footage, but he rarely feeds them anymore.
Constant aperture or constant F-stop zoom lenses don't lose focus as much - higher end or fast lenses don't lose focus at all. This is one of my favorite channels!
Lenses that retain focus while zooming are called "parfocal". You mainly find them in cine lenses as well as microscopes, telescopes, and other scientific lenses. Cine lenses are huge, heavy, MF only, and really expensive. Not for regular scrubs like us.
True.
However, decent lenses that are not specifically "parfocal" can do a respectable job of maintaining focus while zooming.
@@david.stachon also true. But they'll all change at least a little, even L and GM lenses.
Several of the Panasonic S Pro L-mount lenses are parfocal or very close to it.
I don't think it's that it's out of reach for normal scrubs, I think it's that most companies don't see it as a priority in their lens design. Same with focus breathing.
I guess as Panasonic S series mirrorless cameras have a big focus on video, they felt it necessary to design their lenses to be good for video too.
‘I’m not like you.’ It’s safe to agree with that assessment-I’ll place you in that I’m not like other guys category-you’re uniquely you and special, really special. Lol.
"Any giant freak bird... would be interesting..."
Literally my primary goal when I'm out shooting. 😂
That first few seconds where you first start talking about smart phones… we need more of that…
This is the cleanest bg and setup from all your videos imho. 🙏
ohh, I'm really interested in seeing clips from the Axon 40 Ultra. That might be the most complete package right now. All three cameras have 64 MP and OIS, which is incredible for videography. I don't care about the 8k recording, but the specs in general are just perfect on this phone and I love the frameless display and the clean and tidy camera lense array on the back.
I think so too. Also the main and ultrawide cameras are some oretty large sensors, so you get slight toneh
Love your answers 🤣. They are to the point and also give a reality check.
Proper video stabilisation is so important I HATE any kind of jitter it completely ruins the experience.
Especially those who film in 4k but then the jitter will absolutely evaporate any sense of quality.
Jitter is caused by rolling shutter my friend, so get a faster camera in that case, on a global shutter camera there just be a lot of motion blur but everything would still be straight and fine looking.
"Photographers are like kangaroos. They carry too much gear in their slimy pouches." I bow to you sir.
"You never know where it's going be. You can't tell if you're out or in. It's too loose. You can't hold the thing." Now Kasey -- is that really what *SHE* said????
Wonderful! Seeing you camouflaged 😄. If you bring out a Camo Camera Conspiracies Tee, I'll be the first to buy one.
Camo Casey’s Camera Conspiracies
New!
With added Monkey Strength
Ok:
Camo C(k)asey's Camera Conspiracies.
Maybe then you put it better in the first place.
Consistent first letters vs more alliteration.
I have no idea where you are. Insane...
I have that 70-300 lens with the built in tele. It's the Nikor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 ed vr. The teleconverter is my Nikon Z7 II 45mp sensor, that has more cropping ability than the X-T4 and the Sony A7S III combined.
Baby Geese will be hatching in a couple weeks. They are super cute.
They are already hatched here In California. Héron are too
I didn't see you until you moved. That's good camo!
I wonder if the wabble goes away if the camera has global shutter. I think part of the reason why the i7siii does well with the wabble is the fast read out speed.
Take a drive to Hendrie valley in Burlington...Lots of osprey, eagles, everything
I love this kangaroo 😎
the Toneh gods are not pleased
Cool
What do you think of the Leica M11 and the Hubble telescope combination ?
Good Work. I'm second. I delayed for a while as ibwas doing something, but I actually believe I am the first person in the world to receive the notification. Lol.
Just found the joy of shooting wildlife in 240 fps (only 3 videos on my chanel) with my X-E4 and the 100-400. But the unbalanced nature of this combination isn't ideal plus the lack of WR. I'm thinking about getting the X-H1 but will I miss the 240p? Is 120p enough?
I went into an army surplus store to buy some camouflage trousers... but I couldn't find any ... excellent camouflage innit?
Ooh...
Bear killing me in the woods.
*That* would be good content.
You know of any cabins available?
I think stabe is best when you're carrying a monopod while walking downhill on a sheet of ice....
I wonder if a prime lens with 4 built-in TC e.g. 200mm with 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 would be lighter/smaller and still have the same quality, I remember some old Leica lens had 3 specific focal ranges and nothing in between.
This was very entertaining.
I had the losing focus issue with Fujinon 16-80mm, but Fuji mostly fixed the problem through updates. Hoping they will do same for the Fujinon 70-300mm
I sold the 16-80mm, with my xe4 it had shutter shock so had to go to electronic shutter ... Weird
@@nointernetdinosoursgame2351 Wow weird indeed... unfortunately it's hard for companies to keep a nice consistency in quality with newer tech...
Thanks for the answers Kasey, you have inspired me to do wildlife videos, the only issue is I live in Phoenix and its hard to find any wildlife other than scorpions and rattlesnakes. just one follow up question, would there be enough bokeh if I go for F4 to 5.6 telephoto ? Also, what do you think about the new viltrox 13mm f1.5 for Fuji ?
I literally came back on Sunday from a week in Scottsdale. I did a lot of birding and landscape photography in the Tonto National Forest and Superstition Mountains. Lots of birds! I saw ravens, Cactus Wrens, Gila Woodpeckers, Gambel's Quails, White-winged Doves, Turkey Vultures, Curve-billed Thrashers, American Kestrels, and one Swainson's Hawk. And those are just the ones I could firmly ID. I'm told there are desert mountain goats in the mountains, and I heard coyotes one morning.
If desert mountain hikes aren't your thing, try the Desert Botanical Garden. Doves, Gila woodpeckers, Cactus Wrens, quail, song sparrows, purple finches, Great-tailed Grackles, and hummingbirds are all over the place, including nesting birds.
So get off your @$$ and go birding! 😉 And yes, F/5.6 is plenty. I use the RF 100-500, which only opens to F/10 with the 1.4x extender and fully zoomed out. I'm getting really good results with it, even for butterflies (without the extender, it focuses to under 3 feet).
f/5.6 is more than enough when f/6.3 is too much on Micro Four Thirds. Example: ua-cam.com/video/dM7ej4Nphgo/v-deo.html - Bumble bees I shot today. Calling you out Kasey, that Sony doesn't stand a chance to a master of manual focus. I recorded these shots with that Panny boy 100-400 ... handheld 1080p 120fps ... converted to Rec709 with my custom LUT I created using my DSC Labs ChromaMatch Pro color chart, then exposure adjusted with about 2 stops of leeway, tone mapped in Resolve manually so I have nice highlight rolloff. That's right, "color science" is irrelevant to an armchair colorist. Recorded on GH5 II with Flat photo style and +3 saturation to maintain color bit depth. 8 bit video glory shot at 120fps slow motion and 1:1 pixel readout sensor crop (where's that at in 1080 on Sony ... missing in action lol cuz phutagrapher camera) resulting in roughly 2000 millimeter equivalent focal length, hand held shots at 6 to 8 feet away from subjects. Not perfect but way better than what you may typically see. Full frame wildlife telephoto doesn't have that nice minimum focus distance. Oh and 1080p shots converted to 4K using Video Enhance AI software. This scrub is onto something. It's not always about gear but understanding and technique :)
Nothing wrong with taking macro scorpion photos
I'm using the gh6 with panasonic 100-400 which as you know gives me a max reach of 800mm ff equivalent. The 100-400 is also fairly light comparatively and compact too for what it is. It's also a 'fairly' affordable route too given some of the alternatives. I'm just wondering why you being very experienced in the panasonic line have decided to avoid this combination which to me is quite a fantastic setup. The image/video quality as far as I can see is superb and that 800mm reach is insane. Also when you consider shooting at 800mm with the IBIS being so good in the gh6 you can hand hold at 800mm and get stable shots and video, I mean thats just mad that you can do this. I used to have the 200-500mm on the nikon system and first as you rightly pointed out, it didn't have enough reach, but man it was a huge and heavy beast, impractical really. Now I can throw on a rucksack with the panny and take that lens with me everywhere I go in the even I need long reach. So why have you veered away from panasonic? Have you just lost faith in the mft system? I think until other manufacturers come close to matching the reach as well as the form factor of panasonic the mft system is definitely not dead.
he posted a video with a borrowed Panny 100-400 within the last month, irrc. I think his copy had too stiff a zoom ring and.. compared to Fuji or Sony... the image quality isn't as good as it could be. Though I agree, it's a phenomenal lens for it's size / weight / cost.
It's beaver mind control. No chance for the fuj to keep focus.
Pretty sure that some Lumix cameras let you enable/disable the two separate stabilization systems -- separately.
Lumix cameras are also all manual focus so that stab systems gonna have to work overtime to keep shit stable when you gotta focus all the time with your hand.
Nice camo shirt my man (Manager @ Camouflage) …. Stay awesome. Come see us again 😎👍 Shannon
Thanks buddy!
can somonme tell me the name of the background song , when he starting helping us i am f addicted to it
I gotta see you get your hands on the new Sony Xperia I iv
I’m in for a camo shirt.
43rumors: Leica DG Summilux 9mm / f1.7 ASPH $479 or $497.99 next 1-2 months. If good autofocus will it be the perfect m43 vlog lens?…18mm wide with f3.4 effective Toneh.
@ 15:07 thought you were about to introduce the rumor when said would put an 18mm equivalent on a smartphone.
Love your channel.
Especially b/w boardroom conferences.
Most fun.
PS
Liked the lens cap on @ 18:42. If you are “basically invisible” is it kind of like Peek-A-Boo?
PPS
Feel free to delete/edit if stealing your thunder for a future video.
You are hilarious! Thanks.
With all that camo i get the full rayman experience out of this video
KC,it now makes sense why you ignore Nikon,yep,it really does.
That micro four thirds loser Olympus used for this video looks less cinematic than the GoPro. Didn’t even know that was possible. Bravo!! 🤣
Do you know how to get the cinematic look? I guess not since you think it's because of the camera. Even a FF camera will look uncinematic if it's shot at F/8.
Please help me list camera settings and physical actions/choices that can be CHANGED to make a photo better artistically or creatively? Is there anything else, outside of these 2 broad groups, that matters to effect the creative output? Variable CHOICES. Not in post processing.
Help me think outside of the box.
Equipment purchases of course. A new lens doesn’t count or make the list. Things you choose in the moment even if you prepare them in advance. Obviously you have to put in the battery, take off the lens cap, and focus. There are a few binary choices we will exclude. Adding a filter. Turning on the flash. Anything that is not variable can be added to a separate binary list instead. Yes or no choices.
I’m not trying to improve any technical specifications. I will assume it’s a perfect camera. Infinite resolution, sharpness and dynamic range. Any brand or model firmware settings that you know. The rules may change depending on how this goes. For example focus distance is not something you would normally change, just focus on the subject every time. ISO will not be used creatively. We will assume the goal is to obtain the best quality possible without noise at higher ISOs. DOF can be changed a few ways. Not all of them are needed if you’ve already listed 2 methods. There are many settings in a camera that are not significant because they can be modified in post instead. We will not include anything that can also be done post processing. To make it simple let’s assume only the Raw image is captured. This takes away many settings that only effect Jpg.
There are 2 or 3 categories in this answer that do not need to be subcategorized. I broke down one category because I feel it’s not obvious. I came up with 6. A few are so obvious you may not remember to list them. I won’t give them away because someone will get it.
This matters. Should I start?
What is the audio you play behind these? It sounds like the ambient music in an RPG game while your character is just standing around doing nothing.
A friend wants me to record him hitting a golf ball but I only have the Nikon d500 yes good for photos but shall I use it to video with 70-200 Tamron or shall I just use my Samsung ultra, I'm not spending just four this... please don't laugh... (oh I might want a Bluetooth microphone).
Cheers, love ya work...
Candy Crush sequence was epic. Smartphones - seems an industry found a way to sell throw-away cameras at a premium... . As they are marketed to hot babes they have forgotten the darken-beard filter. Or maybe the hot babes prefer grey beards - hmm, sugar.... ?
✌️
XT-4 now or wait for XH2? Video travel landcape no vlogging.
I use the A74 with the sony 200 to 600. Great combo. 10bit video. Although I don't use a monopod for tracking birds in flight for photos I do like it for video. Just makes it less shaky. That crapper monopod you got isn't the answer. By far, the best I have used is the Gitzo GM4532 Series 4 Carbon Fiber Monopod. Will set you back $369USD. Then you need the Wimberley MH-100 MonoGimbal Head at $179 and finally the Wimberly Ap-620 Lens Foot for the 200 to 600 for $79. Understand it is expensive and the total this is just under $630 but it is so light and will last you for years. That foot on the Sony 200-600 is weak. That monopod you had was painful to watch. I hate the three leg monopods. Can you even count that as a monopod. Just sell some more T-shirts and get yourself a great monopod. And yes, I bought a T-shirt from you to do my part.
Do you think the 100-400 would suffice for birds in flight video especially as the A7iv has the 1.5X crop at 4k60? Or is it worth it 200-600?
@@Zarar5 FWIW my answer is no, the 100-400 isn't enough for birds even when shooting crop mode. I shoot a lot of bird videos and the 2xTC rarely comes off my 200-600, though I only shoot FX as there are too many trade-offs when shooting DX. The 100-400 complements the 200-600 for short range work, but if it's a question of either/or, the 200-600 is the better lens just because of the extra reach.
@@Zarar5 If birds and wildlife are your priority my advice is 400mm isn't enough.
rumor of the 1.7 9mm for hobo g9 user like me I will buy if it's true
Nikon 200-500 F5.6E VR. Not internal zoom
CANDIES! 🤩
Yes, when you turned off the light. The video looked 100% better. Not too bright.
Rather good heavy lens for good amazing photos then a crap light lens
Took me ages to find you in this video. I was looking at an empty chair. Never wear camo again. I got very confused.
Oh damn you stole my joke. I hate you most for that.
What’s the point of teleconverters when they ruin image quality 😢
Pocket 2 not worth it anymore?
Dude, I bought the internal type . Because the area where the small diameter goes into the larger diameter introduces dust particals and even moisture to the inside glass pieces. The internal types are fool proof and I'm the fool to prove it.
MFT needs a 70-300f2.8 or faster.. that's a fact. or a 200f1.8 - cause that low light performance is TERRIBLE
So... Sony is now developing its own "Cripple Hammer"?
Such a waste of energy in the first half of the video. Who uses studio lights for a voiceover?
Smart phones do suck.
Are you going to sell your bed, mailbox, and lamp for the 8K Fuji X-H2?
Nice ad placement
get the camo
My pouch is *NOT* slimy!!!!!
Another entertaining video! I think I'm shooting with the best value lightweight camera combos available. The R6 with the RF100-400mm and the A7iv with the tamron 70-300mm RXD . Both are the lightest combos available at that range I think and with great image quality and reasonably priced.
Beer Haired
"Get real with yourself. You haven't been blown in weeks" I almost choked on my coffee 😂🤣
The Sony Alpha 1 does NOT have animal eye AF in video. Some flagship. LOSER
Wait until late June and early July for your baby birds. Most songbirds and hawks will have fledged and left the nest but still beg for food from their parents. I have a hilarious photo of a fully-fledged mockingbird chasing its mother on foot down the sidewalk, mouth agape and wings flapping. I also have a shot of a red-tailed hawk giving its near-grown chicks a squirrel to eat. Listen in the woods for high-pitched, repeating squeals; it could be hawk chicks calling for food.
Addendum: Canon Rumors just confirmed leaked specs for the upcoming R7. APS-C sensor, 32MP, 4K/60, HD/120, C Log 3. Also another crop body, the R10, is coming. It will probably replace the M series. Announcements are expected in two weeks. Are you intrigued?
In-lens image stabilisation is far better with long telephoto lenses compared to in-camera body stabilisation (because the camera body stabilisers have to work too hard). But of course...nothing beats a solid tripod with a good fluid video head.
Sony's IBIS is so bad, I see why they don't bother in a lot of their cameras.
Why i look your videos every now and then? Maybe your style In different and unique. Send me a camerabag.
Please dont anwser me f**k you moron, im sensitive. Thanks.
No need to go all the way up to a Z9 unless you hate your $$$, Nikon Z6ii even has animal eye detect
Why dont you grade flat footage? Thats the whole purpose of it…
Because it already looks good.
@@cameraconspiracies lol, err, ok….😂💀
I am not saying, that you are irrelevant, if you still didn't test and compare SIGMA 150-600mm F5-6,3 DG DN OS | Sports , but you might be.
ok I have a real important question.... what happened to the cat ?? did it die from vegan diet ? girlfriend have allergy ? (if so you picked the wrong one) or something my simple photographer mind cant come up with... :S
Casey, for wildlife I've been really happy with the sigma sports 150-600mm on an R6, I feel like these two are meant for each other. The downsides of the lens - except for its weight - are eliminated by the R6. Try it!
When are you wearing this shirt again?
Never. It had polyester and has been given away.
Good. I hated it anyway.
Woo hoo!
Wow Casey bought the Amazon UA-cam lamp! But so cheap he doesn't turn it on.
I put a 600mm equivalent lens on a gimbal. It worked. You're jealous. It was dumb.
My OM-1 has animal eye detect, but who gives a crap but me?
HOW DARE YOU COMPARE KANGAROOS TO PHOTOGRAPHERS . HOW DARE YOU !!!
Nikon Z9 + 800mm T6.3
Best $11K you'll ever spend on capturing animal pride parades.
A question not related to camera/vlogging (or maybe it is?):
What is your inspirations and influences for your mannerisms?
Ps. I still rock my Canon EOS 70D. Sue me!
Go back to your GH5 and use image lock
😄 🤣 😂 😆
"Im not like you"? Thank god you're not like me. I would not wish that upon anyone. It's hell, but thankfully, life is change. I do feed the birds, while I think about tomorrow.
You’re a good person for caring about photographers and providing help. Some of my best friends are photographers, and aspiring to become multi-person recording Vloggers with good audio! To all you multi-person recording Vloggers get your damn inadequate recording system upgraded!!! Not you K. Thank you for sponsoring the public announcement.
From my experience, when in manual focus on Fujis, using Fuji's lenses (with exception of MK variants), there's a rule to be followed to prevent those focus jumps: DON'T TOUCH ANYTHING !!!
Until you are ready to stop the footage that is...
If it's windy when you're shooting you could try taking off the lens hood and you'll catch less wind and then maybe be less shaky for your telephoto shots.
Streetphotographers dont carry that much around with them.
Cool again. I would never go back to it, but my Sony RX100 VII appeared to be totally parfocal (ie never lost focus whilst zooming on the 24-200 range). Same things happen with Bridge Cameras and Camcorders - they don't lose focus..I have no idea why it seems so difficult for separate lens systems...well until you realise you have to sell your whole life to get a cinematography lens. Always follow the money I guess :)
You should try the Tamron 150-500. It's a lot lighter than the Sony and smaller and you get almost as much reach. And you can use a push/pull technique