I have the Stoeger XM1 variant. Still a P35 chassis so basically identical. First thing I had to do was open up the transfer port slightly, which then allowed me to back off the hammer a little which made cocking much smoother and lighter. Power is now 11.5 ft/p. And extremely consistent. The magazines also had to be split and cleaned to remove burrs and to reduce the spring pressure on the pellets as they were being damaged while being advanced. Now shoots one hole at 25m consistently, with no fliers. Another thing you didn't mention is the eye alignment. Being a bullpup design means you have to use quite high scope mounts which makes learning your hold over/unders essential. Karl
I love the fact you give unbiased unaltered reviews, it looked really notchy to load I bet if you shot a pellet into some clay it would have a shaved off section either from the transfer port or from the leade in where the pellet goes in after the mag due to bad alignment.
So it's a P35 in a wood stock. As a P35 owner, I love mine even though it's the cheapest pcp in my collection (10 off). I wish mine had the option of a wooden stock whe I bought it as the plastic one is quite flexible up front. Very easy to work on as well. Mine actually loves 10gn ZAN slugs and us very accurate.Think it can be the luck of the draw as to if you have a good one or not. Get a good one and they are very accurate. Another great video guys. Thank you.
It looks pretty much identical to my Stoeger bull shark besides the Woodstock and my bull shark is hole in hole accurate unlike that Remington right there the best part of this video was watching you two try to talk around what a TURD it was!
What is the length of your range? I've not seen this mentioned on any of your vids. Without distance it's hard to tell how good (or bad) the test rifles are!
I have the Stoeger XM1 variant. Still a P35 chassis so basically identical. First thing I had to do was open up the transfer port slightly, which then allowed me to back off the hammer a little which made cocking much smoother and lighter. Power is now 11.5 ft/p. And extremely consistent. The magazines also had to be split and cleaned to remove burrs and to reduce the spring pressure on the pellets as they were being damaged while being advanced. Now shoots one hole at 25m consistently, with no fliers. Another thing you didn't mention is the eye alignment. Being a bullpup design means you have to use quite high scope mounts which makes learning your hold over/unders essential. Karl
Very good unbiased review.👍🏻
I love the fact you give unbiased unaltered reviews, it looked really notchy to load I bet if you shot a pellet into some clay it would have a shaved off section either from the transfer port or from the leade in where the pellet goes in after the mag due to bad alignment.
A good honest review, thanks, chaps.
It does not make me regret buying the BSA Defiant.
So it's a P35 in a wood stock. As a P35 owner, I love mine even though it's the cheapest pcp in my collection (10 off). I wish mine had the option of a wooden stock whe I bought it as the plastic one is quite flexible up front. Very easy to work on as well. Mine actually loves 10gn ZAN slugs and us very accurate.Think it can be the luck of the draw as to if you have a good one or not. Get a good one and they are very accurate. Another great video guys. Thank you.
Great Video Guys , Thanks for giving the power output . Regards David
Another brilliant wee video
It looks pretty much identical to my Stoeger bull shark besides the Woodstock and my bull shark is hole in hole accurate unlike that Remington right there the best part of this video was watching you two try to talk around what a TURD it was!
I know you shouldn't have to do it but cleaning up the barrel crown would probably help no end.
Who makes the barrels for the rifle? And maybe it does need to be recrownwd?
I like your reviews boys..
Pull the shroud sounds like a clipper
Hw 99s is a bargain, best uk power air .
My Remington T-rex bullpup has the same flyer problem
Nothing wrong we these guns
What is the length of your range? I've not seen this mentioned on any of your vids. Without distance it's hard to tell how good (or bad) the test rifles are!
Basically a rifle to avoid.
Shame its not up to scratch,looked like it could have been a cracking little pest control gun for buildings.
Hello lads a good honest review,it only looks good for plinking though
Looks like it needs some tlc from a tuning company.Shame really,it’s a
Nice looking rifle.
Same as bull shark stoeger XM1
Where is your "follow through", for most of the shots there was next to none.
Basically it’s not a gun for a starter . Needs to be worked on to get it right.
This thing is defo a bull pub blunder, my friend has one, it’s better used as a cricket bat 😬🤣
Mza ni aya