My takeaway: If you get excited about cupholders you will prefer the Toyota. If you get excited about driving you will prefer the Mazda. Personally I don't find any element of the Toyota attractive; inside or out. Mazda for me!
@kevtn8 Toyota and Lexus has been above Mazda in the time you referenced. Could Mazda eventually overtake them? Perhaps, due to Toyota/Lexus making cars in IN. Vs Japan, but at this time, they have not.
@@The2FO huge difference because of the markup. The one I tested was only the GH Hybrid MAX limited, and that had a markup of $9,500. The sticker price was almost $68k. The Mazda Turbo S Premium had no markup but already had added equipment worth $2000, which brings the total to almost $59k sticker. so it's $9K, give or take (taxes and fees not included).
@@A-E-RONthe GH already has insane markup. This is what happens when you don’t have variety in reliability. Companies, and especially dealerships of those like Toyota and Honda take advantage of their reputation for reliability.
I like the fact that you've started to make full length videos in conjunction with your Shorts. Excellent job, very informative, and you guys are quite fun to watch. Thanks for the review and hope to see more like these in the future.
They're both 3 row SUVs that with similar options and cost basically the same and similar engine sizes and tow ratings. A lot of people will be cross shopping them.
You think the CX-90 is sporty. It’s not. These vehicles are cross shopped and are competitive to one another in size and features. They have similar handling envelopes.
I love my highlander i bought brand new 6 years and 200k miles on the odometer. GH = Made in Indiana. Mazda CX90 Turbo + inline 6 + turbo + rear wheel based awd drove like a sports car. Hit 140+ on a test drive. Oh and CX90 = Made in Japan. Mazda wins this comparison even against GH luxury ver i looked at Lexus TX (1st lexus made in usa). Haha. Toyota taking short cuts while outside 1 model, ALL Mazda models made in Japan = proven quality. 😊
After I heard that I stopped watching the video immediately. I don't want to hear more from these people. And he says the cx90 wheels are 20” and are 21” 😂😂😂😂
Dude i thought mazda came out with a new minivan when i saw it from the back the other day on the highway. Def not my style. I liked the cx-9 way better. I actually own one. But mazda fan boys r always gonna bow down to mazda styling even if it aint good. The grand highlanders ruggedness wins hands down in the styling department on this one but not as good as the palisade.
For those wondering the CX-90 is about the same size as the GH on the outside but quite a bit smaller on the inside, it’s closer to the regular Highlander than the GH. Personally I love the looks of the GH more and I test drove a Platinum AWD, with the brown interior and I loved it. The Hybrid max really pushes you into your seat, I was surprised by how well it moved for its size. The grand Highlander also has all the features shown in the CX-90. If you get the platinum trim. You’ll get the heated and cooled rear seats and rear sunshades as well
It’s clear as night and day that the Mazda looks better both on the inside and the outside. The interior looks to be made with higher quality materials relative to the Toyota.
I seen a grand highlander the other day and loved it. Just need to find a available platinum. Even on the lower trim the driver seat was really soft and comfortable. As you went back rows the seats got firmer
Thanks for the comparison and funny chatter….I’m all about the driving part and CX-90 DELIVERS in that respect. Owner for 2 months now with the same trim level as demo car and it just puts a smile on your face every time you hop in and you guys had a lot of smiles driving despite your lack of sleep. Also nice to have something different than the mainstream offering.
This review grated my senses to watch, but I did appreciate seeing how car seats fit and the deeper drive on leg room. While there are a lot of reasons to lean GH, I don’t see how exterior aesthetics could be one of them. But different strokes.
Just wanted to point it out-that GH was a Limited (middle grade of the 3), whereas the Platinum trim adds ventilation in the 2nd row seats. Also, the pano sunroof is a $1350 option on the Limited, but comes standard on the Platinum.
CX-90 is more European styling, driver-oriented and sportiness. It's still very practical in terms of its size while the interior qualtiy is comaprable to what Lexus is offering. Mazda is also the only Japanese car manufacturer to offer inline 6 rear wheel drive which is comparable to German brand say BMW. Grand Highlander is on the other hand made for grannies (smile) and it equipped with traditional Toyota receipe - boxy design, roomy inside, hybird drivetrain and old school interior layout. But if you sit in you would notice immeidately that material used was quite terrible (otherwise no one will buy Lexus). There are lots of hard plastic on the side door panels and is no match with CX-90. Also while the third-row can be flatten a bit, it's not comfortable. The legroom is actually comparable on both car. Also wondering if I miss out anything, but when you fitting in 2 car carseats on CX-90 you put them on the same side , while GH they are not - wonder if it's a fair comparison? If for the same amount of monies, CX-90 is a no brainer.
The interior is a major upgrade, the passenger volume is up, and the powertrain is gutsier. That said, we prefer the CX-9's styling, and if you didn't plan to use the 3rd row all that often, the CX-9 might be a real bargain at a fair dealer.
Heads up for anyone that is considering the CX-90 with kids. We was able to fit 3 across using three Graco SlimFit LX car seats. Installation for us was the left and right rear facing car seats were using the latch anchors while the center was using the seat belt for forwarding facing. We obviously you won’t be able to access the 3rd row as the CX-90 is missing a tilt option. However, this is great for us as we’re only having 3 kids. If we ever need more seats, we can move two car seats to the back forward facing, giving us two more seats in the 2nd row.
It amazes me how taste is so subjective, in my mind the GH is just a boxy enlarged Rav4 , not that that's bad, but nothing too impressive, whilst the Mazda is slick and somehow sexy and curvaceous. We are definitely wired differently on this front.
Love this review, loved the no-biased approach. Personally for me I would always get the Grand Highlander as I just enjoy Toyota products. HOWEVER, this CX-90 is sooo nice, such a good competitor, I drove a Mazda CX-9 and that car changed me entire opinion on Mazda! Wanna drive the CX-90! Subscribed ✅ Excited for next review ✅
Great review and congratulations on new bundle of joy. With another child (#4) on the way I probably need a minivan but my older kids don’t want me “the boring dad”. Is GH big enough to be that minivan alternative that every father is craving for?
Congratulations on #4 en route! It's really hard to argue with a minivan's practicality, and while the G Highlander is about as spacious as something in this segment gets, you might be missing the cargo space a minivan offers behind the 3rd row. I'd definitely go check one out at a dealer to visualize the space better. You could make it work, but I'd hate for your family to feel squeezed after a short time.
@@MobileMama With the rates being bonkers I went and bought a 2012 Toyota Sienna and man is that a comfortable ride a proven reliability. I'm glad I let my brain make the decision and not my heart.
@@ariescaisip5498 ROFL... I have an BMW M2 and Tesla Model X Plaid and still prefer GH due to it's reliability and space. When you are on a long road trip with kids, it's more space and versatility that you want not the driving dynamics. CX90 makes sense if you have only one car.
Tough to ignore the Hybrid Max of the GH. More power and better mileage is a great combo. And the GH is the more spacious of the two. Conversely, the CX-90 is the better driving car, and it's HP and MPG numbers are nothing to sneer at. I think at the end of the day they're both great vehicles and it's going to come down to personal taste. Either way, you can't lose. One thing I am curious about is the cloth used on the CX-90 dash. I wonder how well that will hold up in a year or two of service. How prone to getting dirty and can it be safely cleaned. I love the look but I'd worry it will look old before it's time.
@@MyMovie5858 Oh, I understand that. There is also a suede option which I think looks even better and would expect to be more durable. I was only pointing out the fancy stuff isn't always the best stuff. Then again, perhaps the cloth is treated and incredibly resilient to dirt and staining. I'll be interested to read opinions on it after owners have 20-30K on them.
I test drove both and I don't care for the fact that the Mazda does not have a touch screen infotainment system. You also cannot view more than one thing at a time on the screen, which is annoying.
I own Toyota 4Runner hate say it but I’m going with the CX90 reason why Cx90 built in Japan quality control it’s a lot better 4Runner built in Japan also 🤷♂️
I just purchased a CX-90, I love it, I don’t care what the back looks like, because I don’t see it when I am driving. I am 6’ 3” tall, I like the leg room front and second row, third row will not be used. I have disabilities and the CX-90 with the almost 90 degree opening is very east for me to get in and out of. I have looked at a lot of vehicles and the CX-90 is for me. The in-line six gets 27-28 mpg for me on the highway. Very satisfied.
They might be both 3 Row SUV but they aren't the same comparison. CX90 should be compared to the regular highlander. Also the cx90 here is being compared to GH that has a Hybrid engine. Cx90 has a plug in hybrid version. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I do not like the looks of GH, it's boring. Though I do not like the artisan red of the cx90. Toyotas are known for practicality. But If you are looking for more than that like: premium quality, craftsmanship, drive performance(zoom zoom). Hands down CX90
Im going to take the Mazda in looks as a whole. The interior also looks more premium over the GH. The GH is a plastic palace. I like the infotainment in the GH. Being RWD bias, the Mazda wins in driving dynamics. I'll give the GH a win in more service centers. That's where toyota's come out on top. Mazda needs more dealerships.
Have you tried to sit in the captain seat? It felt very uncomfortable for me compared to the bench seat. I'd appreciate the feedback. I like the hybrid max but the captain seat is the deal breaker for me. Would the regular hybrid too weak for the weight of grandhighlander?
Mazda FTW... I looks like a younger BMW X7... Yes the Toyota is great for the mom and dad with 3,4,5,6 kids but in today's generation... This Mazda for me has the style and technology that will win it for me... So the question is to drive some new and smart casual... Or a redesign of your Grandma SUV she had running for years...
My mind tells me that the Mazda is better, but my heart and feelings say that the Toyota is better, and I think that those feelings are not because of the Toyota car 😂🤍
We are a family of 5... our 2011 sienna has been great no issues at all . Wify didnt want another minivan.. Looked at the new SEQUIO was too expesive.. I thnik the grand highlander is a home run.. will be cheap on fuel and reliable and wife will be happy.... 😁😁😁
I’ll take the Mazda over the Toyota. I used to own a 2019 Tacoma ; all the plastic interior is flimsy and can easily scratch. Beside, Mazda makes some reliable cars.
@omarirq7886 no. I just purchased the Cx90 Turbo S premium Plus. Artisan red with tan interior. GH. Looks dated already with cheap plastic interior. Mazda has Inline 6 rwd-awl and drives like a dream. GH cvt transmission in some and it's just looks cheap. Bigger is definitely not better
GH wins on looks alone, CX-90 is not only looking almost identical to the previous model CX-9, but also looks like a van! It also requires a premium gas, which combined with worse mileage makes it a pretty questionably choice when EVs are becoming a mainstream!
My takeaway: If you get excited about cupholders you will prefer the Toyota. If you get excited about driving you will prefer the Mazda. Personally I don't find any element of the Toyota attractive; inside or out. Mazda for me!
I'm excited about long-term dependability. Mazda hasn't proven that yet.
@@TheUMIAWhere have you been? Today Mazda is ranked at or above Toyota or Honda in overall reliability. This isn't the 90s or early 2000s anymore.
@kevtn8 Toyota and Lexus has been above Mazda in the time you referenced. Could Mazda eventually overtake them? Perhaps, due to Toyota/Lexus making cars in IN. Vs Japan, but at this time, they have not.
@@TheUMIA Mazda is comparable to Toyota and Lexus in terms of reliability in general according to recent reliability reports.
Been driving Mazda since 1997, have yet to find a different make that can bear a Mazda.
Definitely Mazda CX 90, awesome handling, nice interior. For drving enthusiasts. Mazda Zoom Zoom..
Test drove both, while GH is definitely bigger. I like how the CX90 handles. feels more planted on the road. Cx90 for me.
What’s the price difference?
@@The2FO huge difference because of the markup. The one I tested was only the GH Hybrid MAX limited, and that had a markup of $9,500. The sticker price was almost $68k. The Mazda Turbo S Premium had no markup but already had added equipment worth $2000, which brings the total to almost $59k sticker. so it's $9K, give or take (taxes and fees not included).
@@A-E-RONthe GH already has insane markup.
This is what happens when you don’t have variety in reliability.
Companies, and especially dealerships of those like Toyota and Honda take advantage of their reputation for reliability.
@@A-E-RON9k is alot
@@faheemabbas3965 Two GH's near me were $48k XLE pano roof 4x4 and $58K platinum 4x4. no mark up. The Ohio Toyota dealers are great!
I like the fact that you've started to make full length videos in conjunction with your Shorts. Excellent job, very informative, and you guys are quite fun to watch. Thanks for the review and hope to see more like these in the future.
We're so glad you like these. More to come!
Cx90 has more premium interior, has an option for phev - plus cx90 is made in japan - toyotas advantage is roomier .
Jus5 really hate the infotainment center of the Mazda. It's 2023 everyone uses touch screens
@Tony-hf9mv in 2024, everyone will use rotary knobs lol mazda controls are better than using touch screen. If you use it you'll know better.
Tell that to Acura haha@@Tony-hf9mv
Two totally different mission for both of these: GH family focused, Cx90 sporty budget luxury
Going for the same group of buyers 😉
@@MobileMama gh going for mainstrain, cx90 going for older dem
They're both 3 row SUVs that with similar options and cost basically the same and similar engine sizes and tow ratings. A lot of people will be cross shopping them.
@@omnimoeish one is a minivan for people who dont want a minivan, the other is more like mdx buyers
You think the CX-90 is sporty. It’s not. These vehicles are cross shopped and are competitive to one another in size and features. They have similar handling envelopes.
CX-90 all day long!
I love my highlander i bought brand new 6 years and 200k miles on the odometer. GH = Made in Indiana. Mazda CX90 Turbo + inline 6 + turbo + rear wheel based awd drove like a sports car. Hit 140+ on a test drive. Oh and CX90 = Made in Japan. Mazda wins this comparison even against GH luxury ver i looked at Lexus TX (1st lexus made in usa). Haha. Toyota taking short cuts while outside 1 model, ALL Mazda models made in Japan = proven quality. 😊
Cx5,9,90 made in Japan but cx30,50 in usa that's sad
@yournightmare9999 Yeah only one mazda made in 🇺🇸
GH made in American
Mazda, just love the crisp handling
Makes sense if it's your only car. Else I would have GH as family hauler and a sports sedan for daily!
@@MrTeslaX-vi2qnI went with the cx90 turbo S pp. I also have a 2017 mazda 6 with 170,000 miles
The highlander isn’t better looking 😂 what r u on
Ha I was thinking the same thing🤣
After I heard that I stopped watching the video immediately. I don't want to hear more from these people. And he says the cx90 wheels are 20” and are 21” 😂😂😂😂
Dude i thought mazda came out with a new minivan when i saw it from the back the other day on the highway. Def not my style. I liked the cx-9 way better. I actually own one. But mazda fan boys r always gonna bow down to mazda styling even if it aint good. The grand highlanders ruggedness wins hands down in the styling department on this one but not as good as the palisade.
@@ironwolf4555 the CX 9 design isn’t thrilling but the driving dynamics and interior wins easily. Toyota is Toyota
@@ironwolf4555agreed the rear of the Mazda looks hideous, it’s way to bubbly. It’s a shame since the rest looks great.
For those wondering the CX-90 is about the same size as the GH on the outside but quite a bit smaller on the inside, it’s closer to the regular Highlander than the GH. Personally I love the looks of the GH more and I test drove a Platinum AWD, with the brown interior and I loved it. The Hybrid max really pushes you into your seat, I was surprised by how well it moved for its size. The grand Highlander also has all the features shown in the CX-90. If you get the platinum trim. You’ll get the heated and cooled rear seats and rear sunshades as well
Cx90 all day long because it’s not an uncompetitive Toyota
It’s clear as night and day that the Mazda looks better both on the inside and the outside. The interior looks to be made with higher quality materials relative to the Toyota.
Toyota made cheap in usa
@@yournightmare9999 Personally I don't prefer rounded looks of Mazda, it's too feminine. GH on the other hand looks better with boxy design.
@@MrTeslaX-vi2qn so if you wanna overpay 20K for looks and poor usa reliability go ahead
@@yournightmare9999 Why 20k? I will most probably get the gas engine and limited version. There is no mark up on gas model!
@@MrTeslaX-vi2qn 9k + taxes + fees + % = 20K enjoy toyota usa
Cx90 all the way
I seen a grand highlander the other day and loved it. Just need to find a available platinum. Even on the lower trim the driver seat was really soft and comfortable. As you went back rows the seats got firmer
Thanks for the comparison and funny chatter….I’m all about the driving part and CX-90 DELIVERS in that respect. Owner for 2 months now with the same trim level as demo car and it just puts a smile on your face every time you hop in and you guys had a lot of smiles driving despite your lack of sleep. Also nice to have something different than the mainstream offering.
Glad you liked it! That CX-90 really is the most fun you can have in this segment. The drive is spectacular.
This review grated my senses to watch, but I did appreciate seeing how car seats fit and the deeper drive on leg room. While there are a lot of reasons to lean GH, I don’t see how exterior aesthetics could be one of them. But different strokes.
Glad to hear you survived long enough to see the car seat setup!
Just wanted to point it out-that GH was a Limited (middle grade of the 3), whereas the Platinum trim adds ventilation in the 2nd row seats. Also, the pano sunroof is a $1350 option on the Limited, but comes standard on the Platinum.
And ICYDK it’s also available on the xle
I choose CX90 since it is made in Japan
CX-90 is more European styling, driver-oriented and sportiness. It's still very practical in terms of its size while the interior qualtiy is comaprable to what Lexus is offering. Mazda is also the only Japanese car manufacturer to offer inline 6 rear wheel drive which is comparable to German brand say BMW.
Grand Highlander is on the other hand made for grannies (smile) and it equipped with traditional Toyota receipe - boxy design, roomy inside, hybird drivetrain and old school interior layout.
But if you sit in you would notice immeidately that material used was quite terrible (otherwise no one will buy Lexus). There are lots of hard plastic on the side door panels and is no match with CX-90. Also while the third-row can be flatten a bit, it's not comfortable. The legroom is actually comparable on both car.
Also wondering if I miss out anything, but when you fitting in 2 car carseats on CX-90 you put them on the same side , while GH they are not - wonder if it's a fair comparison?
If for the same amount of monies, CX-90 is a no brainer.
I’m more curious if the cx90 is the better choice over the cx9 and if the price differential is worth it.
The interior is a major upgrade, the passenger volume is up, and the powertrain is gutsier. That said, we prefer the CX-9's styling, and if you didn't plan to use the 3rd row all that often, the CX-9 might be a real bargain at a fair dealer.
And cx90 in future repair is way be costly because of design of engine.
Heads up for anyone that is considering the CX-90 with kids. We was able to fit 3 across using three Graco SlimFit LX car seats. Installation for us was the left and right rear facing car seats were using the latch anchors while the center was using the seat belt for forwarding facing. We obviously you won’t be able to access the 3rd row as the CX-90 is missing a tilt option. However, this is great for us as we’re only having 3 kids. If we ever need more seats, we can move two car seats to the back forward facing, giving us two more seats in the 2nd row.
Did the double stroller fit in the Mazda with the third row up?
No, it didn’t
It amazes me how taste is so subjective, in my mind the GH is just a boxy enlarged Rav4 , not that that's bad, but nothing too impressive, whilst the Mazda is slick and somehow sexy and curvaceous. We are definitely wired differently on this front.
Love this review, loved the no-biased approach. Personally for me I would always get the Grand Highlander as I just enjoy Toyota products. HOWEVER, this CX-90 is sooo nice, such a good competitor, I drove a Mazda CX-9 and that car changed me entire opinion on Mazda! Wanna drive the CX-90!
Subscribed ✅ Excited for next review ✅
Mazda all the way
Great review and congratulations on new bundle of joy. With another child (#4) on the way I probably need a minivan but my older kids don’t want me “the boring dad”. Is GH big enough to be that minivan alternative that every father is craving for?
Congratulations on #4 en route!
It's really hard to argue with a minivan's practicality, and while the G Highlander is about as spacious as something in this segment gets, you might be missing the cargo space a minivan offers behind the 3rd row. I'd definitely go check one out at a dealer to visualize the space better. You could make it work, but I'd hate for your family to feel squeezed after a short time.
@@MobileMama With the rates being bonkers I went and bought a 2012 Toyota Sienna and man is that a comfortable ride a proven reliability. I'm glad I let my brain make the decision and not my heart.
Test drove both and vastly preferred the GH. Waiting to see if we can get our hands on the Hybrid Max version.
I can already see what kind of driver you are... Grand pa
@@ariescaisip5498 You’re driving a 3 row SUV, slick. Not an F1 car.
@@ariescaisip5498 why can't you respect other people's preferences? I'm a Mazda fan btw.
@@ariescaisip5498 ROFL... I have an BMW M2 and Tesla Model X Plaid and still prefer GH due to it's reliability and space. When you are on a long road trip with kids, it's more space and versatility that you want not the driving dynamics. CX90 makes sense if you have only one car.
@MaizeRage25 it doesnt matter. Mazda are drivers period
Tough to ignore the Hybrid Max of the GH. More power and better mileage is a great combo. And the GH is the more spacious of the two. Conversely, the CX-90 is the better driving car, and it's HP and MPG numbers are nothing to sneer at. I think at the end of the day they're both great vehicles and it's going to come down to personal taste. Either way, you can't lose.
One thing I am curious about is the cloth used on the CX-90 dash. I wonder how well that will hold up in a year or two of service. How prone to getting dirty and can it be safely cleaned. I love the look but I'd worry it will look old before it's time.
Cloth dash on the CX90 is only available on the top trim and it is optional.
@@MyMovie5858 Oh, I understand that. There is also a suede option which I think looks even better and would expect to be more durable. I was only pointing out the fancy stuff isn't always the best stuff. Then again, perhaps the cloth is treated and incredibly resilient to dirt and staining. I'll be interested to read opinions on it after owners have 20-30K on them.
Grand Highlander is what I’d take
Love this review. You guys are too funny.
Glad you enjoyed!
Ur energy is so positive. He n ur kids r blessed
CX-90 🖤
Grand highlander all the way!
Absolutely the best family oriented review i was waiting for Grand Highlander. Great job!!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I look for long-term owership with a proven track record. Gotta go Toyota.
The grill on the Toyota is MASSIVE
Did you buy those jeans in 1991? I guess you’re keeping YKK in business.
WRONG! 7:52 The CX-90 actually gets a 6-7-8 seater. You can get the 8 seater with lower trims like the preferred.
I would choose the cx-90
Me too
If single or family of 4 pick the cx90. Family of 6-7 pick Grand hybrid XLE 8 seaters.
The super efficient inline 6 mild hybrid system is hard to beat. I wish the GH had a 6 cylinder option
I test drove both and I don't care for the fact that the Mazda does not have a touch screen infotainment system. You also cannot view more than one thing at a time on the screen, which is annoying.
I own Toyota 4Runner hate say it but I’m going with the CX90 reason why Cx90 built in Japan quality control it’s a lot better 4Runner built in Japan also 🤷♂️
Cx90 is awesome except for the rear design n exterior styling
I just purchased a CX-90, I love it, I don’t care what the back looks like, because I don’t see it when I am driving. I am 6’ 3” tall, I like the leg room front and second row, third row will not be used. I have disabilities and the CX-90 with the almost 90 degree opening is very east for me to get in and out of. I have looked at a lot of vehicles and the CX-90 is for me. The in-line six gets 27-28 mpg for me on the highway. Very satisfied.
It's crazy to see a bagde for 6 cylinders. They are so rare nowadays😂
Mazda is doing a good job ❤
CX90 looks better. Have to disagree with you on that point. I'd buy the Mazda given all the differences.
Did the stroller fit in the Mazda?
Does people actually turn their head to the back while driving when changing lane?
They might be both 3 Row SUV but they aren't the same comparison. CX90 should be compared to the regular highlander. Also the cx90 here is being compared to GH that has a Hybrid engine. Cx90 has a plug in hybrid version.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I do not like the looks of GH, it's boring. Though I do not like the artisan red of the cx90.
Toyotas are known for practicality. But If you are looking for more than that like: premium quality, craftsmanship, drive performance(zoom zoom). Hands down CX90
Cx90
Im going to take the Mazda in looks as a whole.
The interior also looks more premium over the GH. The GH is a plastic palace. I like the infotainment in the GH.
Being RWD bias, the Mazda wins in driving dynamics.
I'll give the GH a win in more service centers. That's where toyota's come out on top.
Mazda needs more dealerships.
Have you tried to sit in the captain seat? It felt very uncomfortable for me compared to the bench seat. I'd appreciate the feedback. I like the hybrid max but the captain seat is the deal breaker for me. Would the regular hybrid too weak for the weight of grandhighlander?
Mazda Mazda Mazda hope for new improvements in 2026
Mazda CX 90 is way better, I grew up with Toyota but you have to admit that Mazda looks better, I only like Toyota trucks
Mazda FTW... I looks like a younger BMW X7... Yes the Toyota is great for the mom and dad with 3,4,5,6 kids but in today's generation... This Mazda for me has the style and technology that will win it for me... So the question is to drive some new and smart casual... Or a redesign of your Grandma SUV she had running for years...
The highlander looks bland, but it's so practical and reliable that it doesn't matter. Mazda looks very premium but looks tight on the interior.
My mind tells me that the Mazda is better, but my heart and feelings say that the Toyota is better, and I think that those feelings are not because of the Toyota car 😂🤍
Have you been to Target Lately? Its a 90s 2000s remix
This is really useful thank you
Stop moving the camera that fast. My head is spinning before I even hit the first Ad.
Agreed.
Mazda's made in Japan!
We are a family of 5... our 2011 sienna has been great no issues at all . Wify didnt want another minivan..
Looked at the new SEQUIO was too expesive..
I thnik the grand highlander is a home run.. will be cheap on fuel and reliable and wife will be happy.... 😁😁😁
Buy newest sienna is more roomier
@@yournightmare9999not as much as the GH third row.
@B0YBawang6 sienna has more space you want to deceive yourself
@yournightmare9999 yes but wife doesn't want another minivan
The phev is actually quicker than the turbo S. Not by much, but it’s quicker.
Grand rav4 not highlander smh. Look nothing like highlander 😂😂😂😊
Grand Highlander for me!
Grand Highlander 👑
You seem to be a nice couple with good chemistry, but not the best chemistry on screen.
Cx90 otra fragancia
Because your baby car seat is too big that’s why the front seat is tighter get a thinner baby car seat 😂
I don’t like that large grill on the Highlander
Will trade in my CX-9 GT for GH H-Max. The 4th Mazda, the first Toyota.
Bad choice
I’ll take the Mazda over the Toyota. I used to own a 2019 Tacoma ; all the plastic interior is flimsy and can easily scratch. Beside, Mazda makes some reliable cars.
Grand Highlander❤
Resale, resale, resale. Toyota will always have my money. Sorry Mazda.
CX -90 feel smaller than the new GH , l tested both & ended up with GH 😍
What... youre insane
@@mbenton6 you must be poor Mazda owner 😂😂
@omarirq7886 no. I just purchased the Cx90 Turbo S premium Plus. Artisan red with tan interior. GH. Looks dated already with cheap plastic interior. Mazda has Inline 6 rwd-awl and drives like a dream. GH cvt transmission in some and it's just looks cheap. Bigger is definitely not better
@@omarirq7886 63000 OTD with destination package and digital mirror
@@mbenton6 good luck having a check engine light in the first 100k miles!
Hands down the vans win when you have more than 2 kids..having people getting in and out in third row when other people parked so close to the car..
all comes down to long term reliability. Toyota will win that column everyday
CX 90 is much better SUV
Please try pilot vs GH
Pilot would destroy it
That was brutal
Only Mazda
They should turn the cx9 into a 2row
That inline 6.turbo tho.
He said twin turbo...
Pricing?
Shared in the video:
The CX-90 Turbo S is $53K to start
The Grand Highlander Limited Hybrid Max is $55K to start
GH wins on looks alone, CX-90 is not only looking almost identical to the previous model CX-9, but also looks like a van! It also requires a premium gas, which combined with worse mileage makes it a pretty questionably choice when EVs are becoming a mainstream!
While premium gas is recommended, You can still put regular gas but you'll lose 20hp.
Regular gas is not going to hurt the engine it only loses horse power, and that is only on the s level trims
The CX90 should be compared to a Lexus, not a Toyota
Irritating overacted review
100% Mazda luxury, - Toyota cheap plasticky interior
Toyota made cheap in usa
Gh is a bigger rav4 for more money
GRAND HIGHLANDER
Uber driver app??? 😮😮😮
you are the best
Mazda is much nicer
Mazda
I v6 all 🛞 drive Mazda win
Very annoying
are u guys both marrie or no?
Yep, @milesperhr is my husband!
The Mazda looks a little dated. It looks like the last 15 years of the Honda CRV.